This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miller, C. T. Articles by Beer, D. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miller, C. T. Articles by Beer, D. G.

Gene Amplification in Esophageal Adenocarcinomas and Barrett’s with High-Grade Dysplasia

Departments of Surgery [C. T. M., J. R. M., L. L., M. D. I., M. B. O., D. G. B.], Biostatistics [M. S.], Radiation Oncology [D. N.], and Internal Medicine and Pharmacology [D. E. B.], University of Michigan Medical School, and VA Medical Center [D. E. B.], Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and overall contribution of specific gene amplification events in the formation of Barrett’s adenocarcinomas. The relationship of gene amplification to clinical-pathological variables and its potential usefulness as a marker for early cancer detection were also examined.

Experimental Design: We used quantitative PCR and Southern blot analysis to screen 87 cases of Barrett’s adenocarcinoma for the presence or absence of 13 distinct gene amplification events. Gene amplification was then examined for correlation with other amplification events and clinical variables (survival, stage, nodal involvement, tumor invasion, smoking history, and gender). Additionally, 22 specimens of Barrett’s with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) were examined for the presence of gene amplification.

Results: One or more amplification events were present in 50 of 87 (57%) adenocarcinomas. The ERBB2 gene was amplified in 19 of 87 (21.8%), CCNE1 in 11 of 87 (12.6%), GATA4 in 9 of 87 (10.3%), KRAS in 9 of 87 (10.3%), EGFR in 7 of 87 (8.0%), CCND1 in 6 of 87 (6.8%), HNF3 in 5 of 87 (5.7%), PIK3CA in 5 of 87 (5.7%), C-MYC in 4 of 87 (4.6%), DYRK2 in 2 of 87 (2.3%), and AIB1, AKT1, and IGF1R were amplified in 0 of 87 (0%) of the tumors. CCND1 amplification was found to correlate negatively with survival (P < 0.05). In addition, the ERBB2 amplicon positively correlated (P < 0.05) with GATA4 amplification. Increased copy number of the ERBB2 (1 of 22), GATA4 (1 of 22), KRAS (2 of 22), C-MYC (1 of 22), CCNE1 (2 of 22), and CCND1 (2 of 22) genes was also observed in one or more Barrett’s adenocarcinomas with HGD.

Conclusions: The high frequency of gene amplification in esophageal adenocarcinomas and HGD indicates the important role of these events in esophageal adenocarcinoma development. Additionally, these results underscore the possible usefulness of early detection approaches and chemotherapeutic strategies (ErbB2 and cyclin D1) targeted against amplified gene products.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. G. Paulson, C. C. Maley, X. Li, H. Li, C. A. Sanchez, D. L. Chao, R. D. Odze, T. L. Vaughan, P. L. Blount, and B. J. Reid Chromosomal Instability and Copy Number Alterations in Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2009; 15(10): 3305 - 3314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Lin, X. Jiang, Y. Shen, M. Li, H. Ma, M. Xing, and Y. Lu Frequent mutations and amplifications of the PIK3CA gene in pituitary tumors Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2009; 16(1): 301 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Rygiel, F. Milano, F. J. ten Kate, A. Schaap, K. K. Wang, M. P. Peppelenbosch, J. J.G.H.M. Bergman, and K. K. Krishnadath Gains and Amplifications of c-myc, EGFR, and 20.q13 Loci in the No Dysplasia-Dysplasia-Adenocarcinoma Sequence of Barrett's Esophagus Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1380 - 1385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Izzo, T.-T. Wu, X. Wu, J. Ensor, R. Luthra, J. Pan, A. Correa, S. G. Swisher, C. K.S. Chao, W. N. Hittelman, et al. Cyclin D1 Guanine/Adenine 870 Polymorphism With Altered Protein Expression Is Associated With Genomic Instability and Aggressive Clinical Biology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 698 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Lagarde, F. J. W. ten Kate, D. J. Richel, G. J. A. Offerhaus, and J. J. B. van Lanschot Molecular Prognostic Factors in Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 977 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Kwak, J. Jankowski, S. P. Thayer, G. Y. Lauwers, B. W. Brannigan, P. L. Harris, R. A. Okimoto, S. M. Haserlat, D. R. Driscoll, D. Ferry, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor kinase domain mutations in esophageal and pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 12(14): 4283 - 4287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Lao-Sirieix, A. Roy, C. Worrall, S. L. Vowler, S. Gardiner, and R. C. Fitzgerald Effect of Acid suppression on molecular predictors for esophageal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2006; 15(2): 288 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Wu, E. Mambo, Z. Guo, S. Hu, X. Huang, S. M. Gollin, B. Trink, P. W. Ladenson, D. Sidransky, and M. Xing Uncommon Mutation, but Common Amplifications, of the PIK3CA Gene in Thyroid Tumors J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4688 - 4693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Dahlberg, B. A. Jacobson, G. Dahal, J. M. Fink, R. A. Kratzke, M. A. Maddaus, and L. J. Ferrin ERBB2 Amplifications in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1790 - 1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]