This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhao, L. Articles by Baguley, B. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhao, L. Articles by Baguley, B. C.

Improvement of the Antitumor Activity of Intraperitoneally and Orally Administered 5,6-Dimethylxanthenone-4-Acetic Acid by Optimal Scheduling

Auckland Cancer Society Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Purpose: 5,6-Dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA), a new anticancer drug that has recently completed Phase I clinical trial, is effective against transplantable murine tumors with established vasculature. We wished to determine the relationship between administration schedule and antitumor activity.

Experimental Design: C57Bl/6 mice with s.c. implanted Colon 38 tumors were used for determination of maximal tolerated doses and tumor growth delay. Plasma and tissue DMXAA concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Results: Continuous infusion (30 mg/kg/day for 3 days) and daily i.p. administration schedules (7.5 mg/kg) were ineffective. A pharmacokinetically guided schedule was developed to increase tumor tissue drug concentrations without increasing the maximal plasma concentration. A schedule comprising a loading dose (25 mg/kg, i.p.) followed by supplementary doses (5 mg/kg after 4 and 8 h) provided a 1.6-fold increase in tumor tissue area under the concentration-time curve, no increased toxicity, and superior antitumor activity (100% cure rate, as compared with 55% for a single i.p. dose of 25 mg/kg). A similar strategy was developed for oral administration with a loading dose (30 mg/kg) and supplementary doses (15 mg/kg after 4 and 8 h). It provided a 90% cure rate, in contrast to a single oral dose (0% cure rate).

Conclusions: The antitumor action of DMXAA is schedule dependent, and the achievement of an adequate tumor tissue DMXAA concentration above a threshold value appears to be critical for activity. The use of a pharmacokinetically guided schedule provides excellent oral activity against Colon 38 tumors and provides a basis for developing more effective administration schedules in clinical trials.