
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
Departments of Hematology and Oncology [V. M. S., A. G.], Pharmaceutical Sciences [W. C. Z., M. N. K., C. F. S.], Biostatistics [M. T., T. L.], and Molecular Pharmacology [P. J. H.], St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital, and Departments of Pediatrics [V. M. S., A. G.] and Pharmacology [P. J. H.] and The Center for Pediatric Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutics [P. J. H., C. F. S.], University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee 38103
Purpose: To assess the use of a pharmacokinetically guided topotecan strategy and evaluate the toxicity of protracted i.v. topotecan in children with recurrent solid tumors.
Experimental design: Fifteen children with measurable relapsed or refractory solid tumors received topotecan i.v. over 30 min 5 days a week for two consecutive weeks. Doses were individualized based on the patients topotecan systemic clearance to attain a single day topotecan lactone area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) of 120180 ng/ml x h (cohort 1) or 80120 ng/ml x h (cohort 2). Clinical responses and toxicity were assessed by standard criteria.
Results: Twenty-nine courses of topotecan were administered, 11 in cohort 1 and 18 in cohort 2. The median topotecan dosages required to achieve the target AUCs for cohorts 1 and 2 were 4 mg/m2 (range, 2.66) and 3 mg/m2 (range, 2.64.2), respectively. The intersubject variance for topotecan clearance exceeded the intrasubject variance by 2-fold. With the pharmacokinetic targeting approach, we observed that 78% (46 of 59) of the measured AUC values were within the target range. The median number of days to an absolute neutrophil count
500/mm3 was similar between the two cohorts; however, febrile neutropenia and serious infections limited our ability to deliver drug dosages needed to secure the higher systemic exposure (cohort 1). Five partial responses were observed.
Conclusion: Protracted topotecan dosing using a pharmacokinetic strategy was possible in this heavily pretreated group of children.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Schaiquevich, J. C. Panetta, L. C. Iacono, B. B. Freeman III, V. M. Santana, A. Gajjar, and C. F. Stewart Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Topotecan in Pediatric Cancer Patients Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6703 - 6711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Metzger, C. F. Stewart, B. B. Freeman III, C. A. Billups, F. A. Hoffer, J. Wu, M. J. Coppes, R. Grant, M. Chintagumpala, E. A. Mullen, et al. Topotecan Is Active Against Wilms' Tumor: Results of a Multi-Institutional Phase II Study J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2007; 25(21): 3130 - 3136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Sessa, S Cresta, T Cerny, J Baselga, E Rota Caremoli, A Malossi, D Hess, J Trigo, M Zucchetti, M D'Incalci, et al. Concerted escalation of dose and dosing duration in a phase I study of the oral camptothecin gimatecan (ST1481) in patients with advanced solid tumors Ann. Onc., March 1, 2007; 18(3): 561 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Freeman III, L. C. Iacono, J. C. Panetta, A. Gajjar, and C. F. Stewart Using plasma topotecan pharmacokinetics to estimate topotecan exposure in cerebrospinal fluid of children with medulloblastoma Neuro-oncol, April 1, 2006; 8(2): 89 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Metzger and J. S. Dome Current Therapy for Wilms' Tumor Oncologist, November 1, 2005; 10(10): 815 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Peterson, C. Tucker, E. Favours, P. J. Cheshire, J. Creech, C. A. Billups, R. Smykla, F. Y.F. Lee, and P. J. Houghton In vivo Evaluation of Ixabepilone (BMS247550), A Novel Epothilone B Derivative, against Pediatric Cancer Models Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 6950 - 6958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. Santana, W. L. Furman, C. A. Billups, F. Hoffer, A. M. Davidoff, P. J. Houghton, and C. F. Stewart Improved Response in High-Risk Neuroblastoma With Protracted Topotecan Administration Using a Pharmacokinetically Guided Dosing Approach J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2005; 23(18): 4039 - 4047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rapisarda, J. Zalek, M. Hollingshead, T. Braunschweig, B. Uranchimeg, C. A. Bonomi, S. D. Borgel, J. P. Carter, S. M. Hewitt, R. H. Shoemaker, et al. Schedule-dependent Inhibition of Hypoxia-inducible Factor-1{alpha} Protein Accumulation, Angiogenesis, and Tumor Growth by Topotecan in U251-HRE Glioblastoma Xenografts Cancer Res., October 1, 2004; 64(19): 6845 - 6848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Stewart, L. C. Iacono, M. Chintagumpala, S. J. Kellie, D. Ashley, W.C. Zamboni, M.N. Kirstein, M. Fouladi, L. G. Seele, D. Wallace, et al. Results of a Phase II Upfront Window of Pharmacokinetically Guided Topotecan in High-Risk Medulloblastoma and Supratentorial Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2004; 22(16): 3357 - 3365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. C. Daw, V. M. Santana, L. C. Iacono, W. L. Furman, D. R. Hawkins, P. J. Houghton, J. C. Panetta, A. J. Gajjar, and C. F. Stewart Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Topotecan Administered Orally Once Daily for 5 Days for 2 Consecutive Weeks to Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 22(5): 829 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |