Clinical Cancer Research Bridging the Lab and the Clinic in Cancer Medicine Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bokemeyer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bokemeyer, C.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 9, 767-773, February 2003
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

Molecular Determinants of Treatment Response in Human Germ Cell Tumors1

Frank Mayer, Hans Stoop, George L. Scheffer, Rik Scheper, J. Wolter Oosterhuis, Leendert H. J. Looijenga2 and Carsten Bokemeyer2,3

Department of Pathology/Laboratory for Experimental Patho-Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center/Daniel, Josephine Nefkens Institute, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands [F. M., H. S., J. W. O., L. H. J. L.]; Department of Pathology, Free University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands [G. L. S., R. S.]; and Department of Oncology, Hematology, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University of Tübingen Medical Center, 72076 Tübingen, Germany [F. M., C. B.]

Purpose: Germ cell tumors (GCTs) are highly sensitive to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. This feature is unexplained, as is the intrinsic chemotherapy resistance of mature teratomas and the resistant phenotype of a minority of refractory GCTs. Various cellular pathways may influence the efficacy of chemotherapy. Their impact has not been investigated in a comprehensive study of tumor samples from clinically defined subgroups of GCT patients.

Experimental Design: We investigated proteins involved in regulation of apoptosis (p53, BAX, BCL-2, and BCL-XL), cell cycle control [p21 and retinoblastoma protein (RB)], and drug export and inactivation [P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) 1, MRP2, breast cancer resistance protein, lung resistance protein, metallothionein, and glutathione S-transferase {pi}] immunohistochemically in samples of unselected GCT patients (n = 20), patients with advanced metastatic disease in continuous remission after first-line chemotherapy (n = 12), and chemotherapy-refractory patients (n = 24). Mature teratoma components (n = 10) within tumor samples from all groups were analyzed separately. The apoptotic index was studied by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling assay.

Results: Invasive GCTs of all groups showed a correlation between wild-type p53 and apoptotic index (rs = 0.66; P < 0.001). The levels of the antiapoptotic proteins BCL-2 and BCL-XL were generally low. p21 was hardly detectable and did not correlate with p53 (rs = 0.29; P = 0.07). No significant differences among the three patient groups were identified regarding any of the investigated parameters (all Ps were >0.08), even though only individual samples from chemotherapy-resistant cases showed a strong staining for MRP2 and GST{pi}. In contrast to other components, mature teratomas showed an intense p21 and RB staining and were mostly positive for MRP2, lung resistance protein, and GST{pi}.

Conclusions: Our results indicate a multifactorial basis for the chemosensitivity of GCTs with lack of transporters for cisplatin, of antiapoptotic BCL-2 family members, of p21 induction by p53, and of RB and an intact apoptotic cascade downstream of p53. These findings suggest a preference for apoptosis over cell cycle arrest after up-regulation of p53. None of the examined parameters offers a general explanation for the chemotherapy-resistant phenotype of refractory tumors. The up-regulation of various factors interfering with chemotherapy efficacy and ability for a p21-induced cell cycle arrest may explain the intrinsic chemotherapy resistance of mature teratomas.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Houldsworth, J. E. Korkola, G. J. Bosl, and R. S. K. Chaganti
Biology and Genetics of Adult Male Germ Cell Tumors
J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2006; 24(35): 5512 - 5518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Juric, S. Sale, R. A. Hromas, R. Yu, Y. Wang, G. E. Duran, R. Tibshirani, L. H. Einhorn, and B. I. Sikic
Gene expression profiling differentiates germ cell tumors from other cancers and defines subtype-specific signatures
PNAS, December 6, 2005; 102(49): 17763 - 17768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
F. Mayer, F. Honecker, L. H. J. Looijenga, and C. Bokemeyer
Towards an understanding of the biological basis of response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in germ-cell tumors
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2003; 14(6): 825 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Cancer Research.