
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
-Difluoromethylornithine-PCV versus PCV for Anaplastic Gliomas1
Departments of Neuro-Oncology [V. A. L., K. A. J., A. P. K., W. K. A. Y., S. I., M. J. G.], Pathology, Section of Neuropathology [J. M. B.], and Biostatistics [K. R. H., H-W. K.], M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-4009; Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin 54449-5777 [A. C.]; Metro-Minnesota CCOP, St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 [P. J. F.]; and University of California, San Francisco, Neuro-Oncology Services, San Francisco, California 94143-0372 [M. D. P.]
Purpose: In the current study, we sought to determine whether the addition of DFMO (
-difluoromethyl ornithine; eflornithine), an inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, to a nitrosourea-based therapy procarbazine, 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea, vincristine (PCV) would be more effective as a postirradiation adjuvant therapy for anaplastic gliomas (AG) than PCV alone.
Patients and Methods: After conventional radiation therapy, 249 AG patients were randomized to receive either DFMO-PCV (125 patients) or PCV alone (124 patients), with survival being the primary endpoint and progression-free survival being an important secondary endpoint. The starting dosage of DFMO was 3 grams/m2 p.o. q. 8 h for 14 days before and 4 weeks after 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea; PCV was administered as described previously (1) . Clinical and radiological (gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging) follow-ups were nominally at the end of each 6- or 8-week cycle (PCV at 6 weeks; DFMO-PCV at 8 weeks). Laboratory evaluations for hematological and other adverse effects were at 2-week intervals.
Results: In the DFMO-PCV arm, there were 114 evaluable patients with 78.1% anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), 3.5% anaplastic oligoastrocytoma (AOA), 14% anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO), and 4.4% other malignant gliomas. These histological groupings were comparable with those of the 114 patients in the PCV arm: (a) 69.3% AA; (b) 7% AOA; (c) 21.1% AO; and (d) 2.6% malignant gliomas. Although improved survival estimates for the DFMO-PCV treatment group persisted over the course of the study, analysis of survival differences over the entire follow-up period did not yield significance (P = 0.11). However, careful analysis of the corresponding hazard and hazard ratio functions indicated that the real treatment difference was limited to the first 24 months of follow-up (P = 0.02). The median progression-free survival for the two treatment groups, as measured from postradiotherapy registration, was 71.1 months for the DFMO-PCV arm and 37.5 months for the PCV-only arm. Median survival, measured from registration, was 75.8 and 61.1 months, respectively, for the DFMO-PCV and PCV arms. The treatment effect persisted when the AA histology was separated from AO and AOA histologies. This effect persisted even after adjusting for the covariates of age, Karnofsky performance status, and extent of surgery. There was a statistically significant increase in grade 3 adverse events for diarrhea and anemia associated with DFMO-PCV. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events of nausea, ototoxicity, and thrombocytopenia were not significantly increased among groups.
Conclusions: The addition of DFMO to the nitrosourea-based PCV regimen in this Phase III study demonstrated a sustained benefit in survival probabilities for AG patients but not in the corresponding hazard rates. Survival analysis from registration found a DFMO-PCV median survival of 6.3 years (49 of 114 events), whereas that for PCV alone was 5.1 years (55 of 114 events). The hazard function demonstrated a difference over the first 2 years of study (hazard ratio 0.53, P = 0.02) but not after 2 years (hazard ratio 1.06, P = 0.84), supporting the conclusion that DFMO adds to the survival advantage of PCV chemotherapy for AG patients by direct temporal interaction with PCV.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Law, R. J. Young, J. S. Babb, N. Peccerelli, S. Chheang, M. L. Gruber, D. C. Miller, J. G. Golfinos, D. Zagzag, and G. Johnson Gliomas: Predicting Time to Progression or Survival with Cerebral Blood Volume Measurements at Dynamic Susceptibility-weighted Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 490 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Simoneau, E. W. Gerner, R. Nagle, A. Ziogas, S. Fujikawa-Brooks, H. Yerushalmi, T. E. Ahlering, R. Lieberman, C. E. McLaren, H. Anton-Culver, et al. The Effect of Difluoromethylornithine on Decreasing Prostate Size and Polyamines in Men: Results of a Year-Long Phase IIb Randomized Placebo-Controlled Chemoprevention Trial Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2008; 17(2): 292 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mani, S. Sandgren, J. Lilja, F. Cheng, K. Svensson, L. Persson, and M. Belting HIV-Tat protein transduction domain specifically attenuates growth of polyamine deprived tumor cells Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2007; 6(2): 782 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Brandes, L. Nicolardi, A. Tosoni, M. Gardiman, P. Iuzzolino, C. Ghimenton, M. Reni, A. Rotilio, G. Sotti, and M. Ermani Survival following adjuvant PCV or temozolomide for anaplastic astrocytoma Neuro-oncol, July 1, 2006; 8(3): 253 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Stupp, M. E. Hegi, M. J. van den Bent, W. P. Mason, M. Weller, R. O. Mirimanoff, J. G. Cairncross, and on behalf of the European Organisation for Researc Changing paradigms--an update on the multidisciplinary management of malignant glioma. Oncologist, February 1, 2006; 11(2): 165 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Law, S. Oh, J. S. Babb, E. Wang, M. Inglese, D. Zagzag, E. A. Knopp, and G. Johnson Low-Grade Gliomas: Dynamic Susceptibility-weighted Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging--Prediction of Patient Clinical Response Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 658 - 667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. K. Basuroy and E. W. Gerner Emerging Concepts in Targeting the Polyamine Metabolic Pathway in Epithelial Cancer Chemoprevention and Chemotherapy J. Biochem., January 1, 2006; 139(1): 27 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-T. Vlastos, L. A. West, E. N. Atkinson, I. Boiko, A. Malpica, W. K. Hong, and M. Follen Results of a Phase II Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial of Difluoromethylornithine for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grades 2 to 3 Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 11(1): 390 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. A. Levin, J. L. Jochec, L. M. Shantz, P. E. Koch, and A. E. Pegg Tissue-based Assay for Ornithine Decarboxylase to Identify Patients Likely to Respond to Difluoromethylornithine J. Histochem. Cytochem., November 1, 2004; 52(11): 1467 - 1474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Wolff, D. K. Armstrong, J. H. Fetting, M. K. Carducci, C. D. Riley, J. F. Bender, R. A. Casero Jr., and N. E. Davidson A Phase II Study of the Polyamine Analog N1,N11-Diethylnorspermine (DENSpm) Daily for Five Days Every 21 Days in Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 9(16): 5922 - 5928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |