
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology,Markers,Clinical Correlates |
Departments of Surgical Oncology [M. I., Y. M., A. A., C. E., Y. T., S. N.] and Surgery and Clinical Oncology [S. H., M. M.], Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Purpose: The association of BRCA2 polymorphisms at codon 372 [Asn (N)/His (H)]and codon 784 [Met (M)/Val (V)] withbreast cancer risk was evaluated in Japanese women. In addition, the prognostic significance of these polymorphisms was studied in breast cancer patients.
Experimental Design: A case-control study was conducted to examine the association of the BRCA2 N/H372 polymorphism and M/V 784 polymorphism with breast cancer risk (cases = 149, controls = 154). The prognostic significance of these polymorphisms was evaluated in 139 patients with primary breast cancer.
Results: No significant association was observed between the N/H372 polymorphism and breast cancer risk. In contrast, a significant increase in breast cancer risk (odds ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.073.87) was observed in carriers of the variant allele (V784) of the M/V784 polymorphism as compared with noncarriers after adjustment for the classical risk factors, age, family history, parity, body mass index, and so forth. Among breast cancer patients, various clinicopathological parameters including menopausal status, tumor size, lymph node status, histological grade, and estrogen-receptor status were not significantly different between the carriers and noncarriers of the variant allele with regard to both N/H372 and M/V784 polymorphisms. The N/H 372 polymorphism was not significantly associated with patient prognosis. On the other hand, breast cancer patients carrying the variant allele of M/V784 polymorphism showed a significantly (P = 0.014) lower 3-year disease-free survival rate (63%) than noncarriers (92%). Multivariate analysis has revealed that the M/V784 polymorphism is a significant prognostic factor, being independent of the other conventional prognostic factors such as lymph node status and estrogen receptor status.
Conclusion: These results suggest that the M/V784 polymorphism, but not the N/H372 polymorphism, would be useful in the selection of women at high risk for developing breast cancer and would also serve as a clinically useful prognostic factor in breast cancer patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Hughes, S. M. Ginolhac, I. Coupier, M. Corbex, B. Bressac-de-Paillerets, A. Chompret, Y.-J. Bignon, N. Uhrhammer, C. Lasset, S. Giraud, et al. Common BRCA2 Variants and Modification of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 265 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Freedman, K. L. Penney, D. O. Stram, L. Le Marchand, J. N. Hirschhorn, L. N. Kolonel, D. Altshuler, B. E. Henderson, and C. A. Haiman Common variation in BRCA2 and breast cancer risk: a haplotype-based analysis in the Multiethnic Cohort Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2004; 13(20): 2431 - 2441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M D Teare, A Cox, J Shorto, C Anderson, D T Bishop, and C Cannings Heterozygote excess is repeatedly observed in females at the BRCA2 locus N372H J. Med. Genet., July 1, 2004; 41(7): 523 - 528. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhu, M. R. Spitz, C. I. Amos, J. Lin, M. B. Schabath, and X. Wu An Evolutionary Perspective on Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Screening in Molecular Cancer Epidemiology Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 64(6): 2251 - 2257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |