This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Palena, C. Articles by Tsang, K.-Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Palena, C. Articles by Tsang, K.-Y.

Differential Gene Expression Profiles in a Human T-cell Line Stimulated with a Tumor-associated Self-peptide versus an Enhancer Agonist Peptide

Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Purpose: Previous studies have shown that a specific 9-mer amino acid epitope (designated CAP-1) of the human "self" tumor-associated carcinoembryonic antigen can be used to stimulate CD8+ T cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of carcinoma patients vaccinated with pox vector-based carcinoembryonic antigen vaccines. A T-cell receptor agonist epitope of CAP-1 (designated CAP1-6D) has been shown to enhance the stimulation of T cells over levels obtained using CAP-1. The purpose of this study was to analyze gene expression profiles in T cells stimulated with the native CAP-1 versus the agonist CAP1-6D peptide.

Experimental Design: Microarray analyses were conducted to analyze differential gene expression profiles of a T-cell line stimulated with native versus agonist peptides.

Results: Numerous genes and gene clusters are identified as differentially expressed as a consequence of stimulation with the agonist peptide versus the native peptide; two genes, however, stand out in magnitude: the chemokine lymphotactin and granzyme B. In particular, lymphotactin expression is >12 times more pronounced in agonist-stimulated T cells. An ELISA assay was developed that confirmed marked lymphotactin secretion in T cells when stimulated with the agonist versus the native peptide. A chemotaxis assay also demonstrated the biological activity of the lymphotactin produced.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, these are the first studies of gene expression profiles of a defined T-cell line in response to stimulation with a defined antigen. They are also the first to compare, via cDNA microarray, responses of a T-cell line to (a) a tumor-associated self-antigen and (b) a native epitope versus an agonist epitope.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Yokokawa, C. Palena, P. Arlen, R. Hassan, M. Ho, I. Pastan, J. Schlom, and K. Y. Tsang Identification of Novel Human CTL Epitopes and Their Agonist Epitopes of Mesothelin Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 11(17): 6342 - 6351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K.-Y. Tsang, C. Palena, J. Gulley, P. Arlen, and J. Schlom A Human Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Epitope and Its Agonist Epitope from the Nonvariable Number of Tandem Repeat Sequence of MUC-1 Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 10(6): 2139 - 2149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]