Clinical Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, C.
Right arrow Articles by Glisson, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, C.
Right arrow Articles by Glisson, B. S.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 9, 2085-2091, June 2003
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

A Phase I Study of Topotecan/Paclitaxel Alternating with Etoposide/Cisplatin and Thoracic Irradiation in Patients with Limited Small Cell Lung Cancer1

Charles Lu, Ritsuko Komaki, Jin Soo Lee, Dong M. Shin, J. Lynn Palmer, Brenda J. Coldman, Katherine M. Pisters, Jonathan M. Kurie, Frank V. Fossella and Bonnie S. Glisson2

Departments of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology [C. L., B. J. C., K. M. P., J. M. K., F. V. F., B. S. G.], Radiation Oncology [R. K.], and Biostatistics [J. L. P.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030; The National Cancer Center Hospital, Kyonggi, Korea [J. S. L.]; and The University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 [D. M. S]

Purpose: Topotecan and paclitaxel are promising cytotoxic drugs with novel mechanisms of action relative to other chemotherapies used in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In an effort to integrate paclitaxel and topotecan into the treatment of limited disease (LD) SCLC, we conducted a Phase I study of these agents administered as initial induction therapy.

Experimental Design: Escalating doses of topotecan (0.8–1.4 mg/m2 d1–5) and paclitaxel (110–175 mg/m2 d1) were administered i.v. every 21 days for two cycles to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients with LD SCLC. This was followed by two cycles of etoposide (120 mg/m2 d1–3) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 d1) with thoracic radiotherapy. The first 5 subjects received 1.8 Gy once daily x 25 fractions, while subsequent subjects received 1.5 Gy twice daily x 30 fractions. Two additional cycles of chemotherapy (topotecan and paclitaxel, followed by etoposide and cisplatin) were given.

Results: Common toxicities included grade ≥3 neutropenia in 67% of courses of topotecan and paclitaxel and grade ≥2 esophagitis in 71% of patients. The MTD was based on toxicity during the first two cycles of chemotherapy and defined after accrual of 18 patients to four dose levels. Two of three patients developed grade 3 nonhematological toxicity (pneumonia) at the fourth dose level. Thus, the third dose level (topotecan 1.2 mg/m2, paclitaxel 160 mg/m2) was defined as the MTD recommended for Phase II studies. One subject died suddenly on day 2 of cycle 1 without autopsy confirmation of the etiology. A second subject died during cycle 3 due to thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal bleeding, and respiratory failure. Response rates after induction of topotecan and paclitaxel: 16 of 18 (88.8%) partial response, 1 of 18 (5.5%) complete response. Response rates after completion of therapy: 10 of 18 (55.5%) partial response, 7 of 18 (38.8%) complete response.

Conclusions: Induction topotecan and paclitaxel before chemoradiotherapy in patients with LD SCLC is feasible and results in expected toxicities. The outcome of a recently closed Cancer and Leukemia Group B Phase II study of similar design (CLB-39808) should help determine whether or not this approach warrants testing in a randomized setting.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
A P. S Hungin, A. S Raghunath, and I. Wiklund
Beyond heartburn: a systematic review of the extra-oesophageal spectrum of reflux-induced disease
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2005; 22(6): 591 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Cancer Research.