This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rassidakis, G. Z. Articles by Gilles, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rassidakis, G. Z. Articles by Gilles, F.

Prognostic Significance of MUC-1 Expression in Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma¹

Departments of Lymphoma-Myeloma [G. Z. R., A. G., Y. J., A. T., Y. R., F. C., A. H. S.], Hematopathology [G. Z. R., L. J. M.], and Molecular Pathology [F. G.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030

Systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) frequently carries the t(2;5)(p23;q35) and overexpresses anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). MUC-1, a highly glycosylated transmembrane protein, is detected in normal and malignant epithelial cells and has been associated with a poorer patient survival in various human malignancies. We have shown previously that MUC-1 is expressed as a consequence of t(1;14)(q21;32) in a subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. ALCLs are known to express MUC-1, but its clinical significance is undefined. For this study, eligible patients with ALCL were HIV negative, received anthracycline-containing regimens, and had pretreatment archival tissue. Expression of MUC-1 and ALK was determined immunohistochemically after heat-induced antigen retrieval. A 10% cutoff for MUC-1 positivity was used. We identified 63 patients with systemic ALCL (22 ALK+, 41 ALK-) with a median age of 47 years, and 41 were male. MUC-1 was detected in 16 of 22 (73%) ALK-positive and 20 of 41 (49%) ALK-negative ALCL (P = 0.06, ² test). MUC-1 expression was not associated with apoptotic rate as detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling assay or proliferation index as evaluated by MIB-1 antibody. For 48 patients with ALCL (16 ALK+, 32 ALK-) and complete clinical follow-up, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 39.7% for patients with MUC-1-positive tumors versus 75.2% (P = 0.027 by Log-rank) for patients with MUC-1-negative tumors. For the ALK-negative ALCL group of 32 patients, the 5-year PFS was 26 versus 70.8% for patients with MUC-1-positive versus MUC-1-negative tumors (P = 0.0096 by Log-rank). For the ALK-positive ALCL group of 16 patients, the 5-year PFS was 52 versus 100% for patients with MUC-1-positive versus MUC-1-negative tumors (P, not significant). In summary, MUC-1 is frequently expressed in systemic ALCL, and its expression is associated with significantly inferior outcome in patients untreated previously with ALK-negative tumors. Future studies should explore the underlying molecular mechanisms of MUC-1 expression in these tumors and its role as a target for novel therapeutic strategies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Jacobsen Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma, T-/Null-Cell Type Oncologist, July 1, 2006; 11(7): 831 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Levi, D S Klimstra, N V Adsay, A Andea, and O Basturk MUC1 and MUC2 in pancreatic neoplasia J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2004; 57(5): 456 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]