Clinical Cancer Research AACR Conference on Cancer Prevention Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ott, K.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ott, K.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, G.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 9, 2307-2315, June 2003
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

Chromosomal Instability Rather Than p53 Mutation Is Associated with Response to Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Gastric Carcinoma1

Katja Ott, Holger Vogelsang, James Mueller, Karen Becker, Martina Müller, Ulrich Fink, Jörg Rüdiger Siewert, Heinz Höfler and Gisela Keller2

Department of Surgery [K. O., H. V., U. F., J. R. S.], Institute of Pathology [K. B., H. H., G. K.], and Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology [M. M.], Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, D-81675 Munich, Germany, and Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts [J. M.]

Purpose: The objective of the study was to evaluate microsatellite alterations [microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH)] and mutation in the p53 gene in relation to response and patient survival to a cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

Experimental Design: Fifty-three pretherapeutic gastric carcinoma biopsies were analyzed with 11 microsatellite markers. The entire coding region of the p53 gene (exons 2–11) was analyzed for mutations by denaturing high-pressure liquid chromatography and sequencing. p53 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Patients were treated with a cisplatin-based, neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Therapy response was evaluated by computed tomography scan, endoscopy, and endoluminal ultrasound. The median follow-up of the patients was 45.6 months.

Results: p53 mutations were identified in 19 of the 53 (36%) analyzed tumors. No significant association with response or survival was found for p53 mutation or for p53 protein expression. MSI (either high-grade MSI or low-grade MSI) did not show a correlation with response. With respect to LOH, LOH at chromosome 17p13 showed a significant association with therapy response (P = 0.022) but did not reach statistical significance in terms of patient survival. The global LOH rate, expressed as fractional allelic loss (FAL), was assessed, and tumors were classified into tumors with a high (>0.5), medium (>0.25–0.5), and low (0–0.25) FAL value. A statistically significant association of FAL with therapy response was found (P = 0.003), with a high FAL being related to therapy response. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for FAL > 0.5 were 45%, 93%, 82%, and 72%, respectively.

Conclusions: A high level of chromosomal instability (high FAL value) defines a subset of patients who are more likely to benefit from cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. p53 mutation status is not significantly associated with therapy response and is not a useful marker for response prediction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
K. Herrmann, K. Ott, A. K. Buck, F. Lordick, D. Wilhelm, M. Souvatzoglou, K. Becker, T. Schuster, H.-J. Wester, J. R. Siewert, et al.
Imaging Gastric Cancer with PET and the Radiotracers 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG: A Comparative Analysis
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 1945 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Napieralski, K. Ott, M. Kremer, K. Becker, A.-L. Boulesteix, F. Lordick, J. R. Siewert, H. Hofler, and G. Keller
Methylation of Tumor-Related Genes in Neoadjuvant-Treated Gastric Cancer: Relation to Therapy Response and Clinicopathologic and Molecular Features
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 13(17): 5095 - 5102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Napieralski, K. Ott, M. Kremer, K. Specht, H. Vogelsang, K. Becker, M. Muller, F. Lordick, U. Fink, J. Rudiger Siewert, et al.
Combined GADD45A and Thymidine Phosphorylase Expression Levels Predict Response and Survival of Neoadjuvant-Treated Gastric Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 3025 - 3031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
G Keller, H Vogelsang, I Becker, S Plaschke, K Ott, G Suriano, A R Mateus, R Seruca, K Biedermann, D Huntsman, et al.
Germline mutations of the E-cadherin(CDH1) and TP53 genes, rather than of RUNX3 and HPP1, contribute to genetic predisposition in German gastric cancer patients
J. Med. Genet., June 1, 2004; 41(6): e89 - e89.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
K. Ott, U. Fink, K. Becker, A. Stahl, H.-J. Dittler, R. Busch, H. Stein, F. Lordick, T. Link, M. Schwaiger, et al.
Prediction of Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Gastric Carcinoma by Metabolic Imaging: Results of a Prospective Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2003; 21(24): 4604 - 4610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Cancer Research.