
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Departments of Breast Medical Oncology [L. P., F. J. E., B. A., M. C., D. B., M. R., V. V., C. A., G. N. H.], Pathology [N. S., W. F. S.], Biomathematics [K. H., D. S.], and Radiation Oncology [T. A. B.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-009, and Millennium Predictive Medicine Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts [M. A., J. S., E. C., A. D.]
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether comprehensive transcriptional profiles (TPs) can be obtained from single-passage fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) of breast cancer and to explore whether profiles capture routine clinicopathological parameters.
Experimental Design: Expression profiles were available on 38 patients with stage I-III breast cancer who underwent FNA at the time of diagnosis. [33P]dCTP-labeled cDNA probes were generated and hybridized to cDNA membrane microarrays that contained 30,000 human sequence clones, including 10,890 expressed sequence tags.
Results: The median total RNA yield from the biopsies was 2 µg (range, 125 µg). The cellular composition of each biopsy was examined and, on average,, 79% of the cells were cancer cells. TP was successfully performed on all 38 of the biopsies. Unsupervised complete-linkage hierarchical clustering with all of the biopsies revealed an association between estrogen receptor (ER) status and gene expression profiles. There was a strong correlation between ER status determined by TP and measured by routine immunohistochemistry (P = 0.001). A similar strong correlation was seen with HER-2 status determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization (P = 0.0002). Using the first 18 cases as the discovery set, we established a cutoff of 2.0 and 18.0 for ER and HER-2 mRNA levels, respectively, to distinguish clinically-negative from -positive cases. We also identified 105 genes (excluding the ER gene) the expression of which correlated highly with clinical ER status. Twenty tumors were used for prospective validation. HER-2 status was correctly identified in all 20 of the cases, based on HER-2 mRNA content detected by TP. ER status was correctly identified in 19 of 20 cases. When the marker set of 105 genes was used to prospectively predict ER status, TP-based classification correctly identified 9 of 10 of the ER-positive and 7 of 10 of the ER-negative tumors. We also explored supervised cluster analysis using various functional categories of genes, and we observed a clear separation between ER-negative and ER-positive tumors when genes involved in signal transduction were used for clustering.
Conclusions: These results demonstrate that comprehensive TP can be performed on FNA biopsies. TPs reliably measure conventional single-gene prognostic markers such as ER and HER-2. A complex pattern of genes (not including ER) can also be used to predict clinical ER status. These results demonstrate that needle biopsy-based diagnostic microarray tests may be developed that could capture conventional prognostic information but may also contain additional clinical information that cannot currently be measured with other methods.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Sauer, N. Schneiderhan-Marra, C. Kazmaier, K. Hutzel, K. Koretz, R. Muche, R. Kreienberg, T. Joos, and H. Deissler Prediction of Nodal Involvement in Breast Cancer Based on Multiparametric Protein Analyses from Preoperative Core Needle Biopsies of the Primary Lesion Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3345 - 3353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. G. Yulug and B. Gur-Dedeoglu Functional genomics in translational cancer research: focus on breast cancer Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, March 7, 2008; (2008) eln009v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Wolff, D. Berry, L. A. Carey, M. Colleoni, M. Dowsett, M. Ellis, J. E. Garber, D. Mankoff, S. Paik, L. Pusztai, et al. Research Issues Affecting Preoperative Systemic Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 806 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pusztai, K. Anderson, and K. R. Hess Pharmacogenomic Predictor Discovery in Phase II Clinical Trials for Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 13(20): 6080 - 6086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Ross, W. F. Symmans, L. Pusztai, and G. N. Hortobagyi Standardizing Slide-Based Assays in Breast Cancer: Hormone Receptors, HER2, and Sentinel Lymph Nodes Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 2831 - 2835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Rubio-Viqueira, H. Mezzadra, M. E. Nielsen, A. Jimeno, X. Zhang, C. Iacobuzio-Donahue, A. Maitra, M. Hidalgo, and S. Altiok Optimizing the development of targeted agents in pancreatic cancer: tumor fine-needle aspiration biopsy as a platform for novel prospective ex vivo drug sensitivity assays Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2007; 6(2): 515 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K Gruvberger-Saal, H. E Cunliffe, K. M Carr, and I. A Hedenfalk Microarrays in breast cancer research and clinical practice - the future lies ahead Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 1017 - 1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dolled-Filhart, L. Ryden, M. Cregger, K. Jirstrom, M. Harigopal, R. L. Camp, and D. L. Rimm Classification of breast cancer using genetic algorithms and tissue microarrays. Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 12(21): 6459 - 6468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Amann, P. Chaurand, A. Gonzalez, J. A. Mobley, P. P. Massion, D. P. Carbone, and R. M. Caprioli Selective Profiling of Proteins in Lung Cancer Cells from Fine-Needle Aspirates by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 12(17): 5142 - 5150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pusztai, C. Mazouni, K. Anderson, Y. Wu, and W. F. Symmans Molecular Classification of Breast Cancer: Limitations and Potential Oncologist, September 1, 2006; 11(8): 868 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Nygaard and E. Hovig Options available for profiling small samples: a review of sample amplification technology when combined with microarray profiling Nucleic Acids Res., February 9, 2006; 34(3): 996 - 1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W F Symmans, D J Fiterman, S K Anderson, M Ayers, R Rouzier, V Dunmire, J Stec, V Valero, N Sneige, C Albarracin, et al. A single-gene biomarker identifies breast cancers associated with immature cell type and short duration of prior breastfeeding Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2005; 12(4): 1059 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Stec, J. Wang, K. Coombes, M. Ayers, S. Hoersch, D. L. Gold, J. S Ross, K. R. Hess, S. Tirrell, G. Linette, et al. Comparison of the Predictive Accuracy of DNA Array-Based Multigene Classifiers across cDNA Arrays and Affymetrix GeneChips J. Mol. Diagn., August 1, 2005; 7(3): 357 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hannemann, H. M. Oosterkamp, C. A.J. Bosch, A. Velds, L. F.A. Wessels, C. Loo, E. J. Rutgers, S. Rodenhuis, and M. J. van de Vijver Changes in Gene Expression Associated With Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2005; 23(15): 3331 - 3342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ji, C. Wu, P. Liu, J. Wang, and K. R. Coombes Applications of beta-mixture models in bioinformatics Bioinformatics, May 1, 2005; 21(9): 2118 - 2122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Hartmann, K. H. Lu, G. P. Linette, W. A. Cliby, K. R. Kalli, D. Gershenson, R. C. Bast, J. Stec, N. Iartchouk, D. I. Smith, et al. Gene Expression Profiles Predict Early Relapse in Ovarian Cancer after Platinum-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2005; 11(6): 2149 - 2155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P.H.M. Jansen, J. A. Foekens, I. L. van Staveren, M. M. Dirkzwager-Kiel, K. Ritstier, M. P. Look, M. E. Meijer-van Gelder, A. M. Sieuwerts, H. Portengen, L. C.J. Dorssers, et al. Molecular Classification of Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Carcinomas by Gene Expression Profiling J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2005; 23(4): 732 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pusztai and K. R. Hess Clinical trial design for microarray predictive marker discovery and assessment Ann. Onc., December 1, 2004; 15(12): 1731 - 1737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Modlich, H.-B. Prisack, M. Munnes, W. Audretsch, and H. Bojar Immediate Gene Expression Changes After the First Course of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer Disease Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2004; 10(19): 6418 - 6431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Finley, N. Arora, B. Zhu, L. Gallagher, and T. J. Fahey III Molecular Profiling Distinguishes Papillary Carcinoma from Benign Thyroid Nodules J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3214 - 3223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ayers, W.F. Symmans, J. Stec, A.I. Damokosh, E. Clark, K. Hess, M. Lecocke, J. Metivier, D. Booser, N. Ibrahim, et al. Gene Expression Profiles Predict Complete Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel and Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2004; 22(12): 2284 - 2293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.-S. Han, Y. Wu, R. McCarter, J. F. Nelson, A. Richardson, and S. G. Hilsenbeck Reproducibility, Sources of Variability, Pooling, and Sample Size: Important Considerations for the Design of High-Density Oligonucleotide Array Experiments J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., April 1, 2004; 59(4): B306 - B315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Ross, J. A. Fletcher, K. J. Bloom, G. P. Linette, J. Stec, W. F. Symmans, L. Pusztai, and G. N. Hortobagyi Targeted Therapy in Breast Cancer: The HER-2/neu Gene and Protein Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2004; 3(4): 379 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Frasor, F. Stossi, J. M. Danes, B. Komm, C. R. Lyttle, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators: Discrimination of Agonistic versus Antagonistic Activities by Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer Cells Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1522 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |