
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
1Department of Pathology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida;2 Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida;3 Clinomics BioSciences, Inc., Pittsfield, Massachusetts;4 London Regional Cancer Centre, London, Ontario, Ontario, Canada; and5 Department of Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design: We used immunohistochemistry to detect OPN in a selection of 350 human tumors and 113 normal tissues, from a variety of body sites, using stage-oriented human cancer tissue arrays. Tumors included malignancies from breast (26), ovary (22), endometrium (14), esophagus (10), stomach (11), pancreas (16), bile duct (1), liver (9), colon (20), kidney (53), bladder (33), prostate (28), head and neck (60), salivary glands (14), lung (17), skin (6), and brain (10).
Results: High cytoplasmic OPN staining was observed in 100% of gastric carcinomas, 85% of colorectal carcinomas, 82% of transitional cell carcinomas of the renal pelvis, 81% of pancreatic carcinomas, 72% of renal cell carcinomas, 71% of lung and endometrial carcinomas, 70% of esophageal carcinomas, 58% of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck, and 59% of ovarian carcinomas. Although OPN expression was identified in a good number of bladder, prostate, and brain tumors, the majority of 6 skin cancers, 11 of 14 salivary gland cancers, 2 thyroid carcinomas, and 23 of 26 breast cancers revealed low OPN positivity or were negative. When considering all sites, OPN expression significantly correlated with tumor stage (Spearmans correlation coefficient, P = 0.0002). OPN score and stage were also significantly correlated for specific cancer sites including bladder (P = 0.01), colon (P = 0.004), kidney (P = 0.0001), larynx (P = 0.035), mouth (P = 0.046), and salivary gland (P = 0.011).
Conclusions: This study reports the broad distribution of OPN in human tumors from different body sites, suggesting involvement of this protein in tumor formation. The strong correlation between pathological stage and OPN across multiple tumor types suggests a role for OPN in tumor progression.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
OPN was first implicated in malignancy by in vitro studies detecting increased levels of OPN expression after cell transformation (12 , 13) and from the observation that tumor cells with high metastatic potential had increased OPN expression (14, 15, 16, 17) . OPN protein also plays a role in immune functions (18) and in vascular remodeling (19) . OPN is secreted into various body fluids including blood, urine, milk, and cochclear fluid (20 , 21) . The low baseline concentration of circulating OPN has been found to be elevated in patients with breast, prostate, and other cancers, and in some studies elevated plasma OPN has been shown to be associated with poor patient survival (22, 23, 24, 25) . OPN levels in tumor tissue have also been associated with tumor progression in breast, lung, prostate, and colon cancer (2, 3, 4, 5 , 26) .
OPN has been shown to have the following cell adhesion properties: it can bind integrins, in particular
vß3 (vitronectin receptor; 27
) but also
vß1,
vß5 (28
, 29)
and the hyaluronic acid receptor CD44 (30)
and/or its variants (31)
. It has been shown that the RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) amino acid sequence of OPN is crucial for the ability of OPN to support cell adhesion and chemotaxis (32
, 33)
. OPN thus may contribute to tumor invasion and metastasis via integrin-mediated signaling (1
, 6
, 7
, 34)
.
Tissue distribution of OPN has been examined previously in normal and tumor tissues, by both immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization (26 , 35 , 36) . However, a systematic assessment of OPN protein levels in a large series of human tumors and normal tissue has not been undertaken previously. Here, we define the distribution of OPN expression in a group of 350 human cancers from a large variety of anatomical sites and in 113 corresponding normal tissues from the same sites. The detection of OPN was performed under the same experimental conditions allowing the accurate comparison of the stain between tumors of different type and between tumors of the same histological type.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunohistochemistry.
Anti-OPN murine monoclonal antibody (mAb53, prepared against recombinant glutathione S-transferase human OPN fusion protein, dilution at 1:1000; Refs. 26
and 33
) was applied to 3 µM sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens, using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method (Vectastatin Elite ABC kit; Vector, Burlingame, CA), following the manufacturers instructions. In brief, the immunostaining was performed manually at room temperature. Endogenous peroxidase and nonspecific background staining were blocked by incubating slides with 3% aqueous hydrogen peroxide for 10 min. After washing with PBS for 5 min, slides were blocked with normal serum for 20 min, followed by incubation with the anti-OPN primary antibody, at the dilution given, for 60 min. After rinsing with PBS for 5 min, sections were incubated with a biotinylated secondary antibody for 20 min. After washing with PBS for 5 min, slides were incubated with avidin-biotin complex for 30 min and washed again. Chromogen was developed with 10 mg of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) diluted in 12 ml of Tris buffer (pH 7.6) for 2 min. All samples were lightly counterstained with Mayers hematoxylin for 30 s before dehydration and mounting. No antigen retrieval was performed. Positive controls and nonimmune protein-negative controls were used for each section. A section of colon cancer proven previously to be OPN positive by Western blot (5)
was used as a positive control. Mouse IgG was used as the negative control serum.
Tumor staining was semiquantitatively examined by a pathologist (D. Coppola) using the Allred 8-unit system (37) . For each tumor, represented by one slide, we determined the tumor epithelial cells proportion score and intensity score. Peritumoral inflammatory and stromal cells were not included in the evaluation. The proportion score included the fraction of positively stained tumor cells and was as follows: 0 = none, 1 = <1/100th; 2 = 1/100th to 1/10th; 3 = 1/10th to 1/3; 4 = 1/3 to 2/3; 5 = >2/3. The estimated average staining intensity of the positive tumor cells was expressed as follows: 0 = none; 1 = weak; 2 = intermediate; 3 = strong (37) . For the statistical analysis an OPN score of 13 was considered low, an OPN score of 46 was considered intermediate, and an OPN score of 78 was considered high.
Statistical Analysis.
The immunohistochemical results were analyzed by using the nonparametric Spearmans correlation coefficient method. A test was run for all sites combined and one for each of the site groupings.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
65 years of age (rs = 0.218, P = 0.039) and >65 years of age (rs = 0.214, P = 0.001) were considered independently. When considering all sites, this correlation was highly significant (rs = 0.213, P = 0.0002). Moreover, significant statistical correlation between OPN score and stage was also observed for specific site cancer groupings including bladder (rs = 0.432, P = 0.01), colon (rs = 0.619, P = 0.004), kidney (rs = 0.641, P = 0.0001), larynx (rs = 0.586, P = 0.035), mouth (rs = -0.462, P = 0.046), and salivary gland (rs = 0.654, P = 0.011). For ovarian cancers, the correlation approached significance (rs = 0.412, P = 0.057). A valid test could not be applied to some of the site groupings (tumors of the bile duct, brain, esophagus, lip, liver, prostate, skin, and thyroid), either because of the few cases per group or because all of the tumors had the same stage value (Tables 1
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
vß3 integrin; Ref. 27
) but also via other integrins and the hyaluronic acid receptor CD44 (27, 28, 29, 30, 31)
. OPN is also up-regulated in several pathological contexts, including immune reactivity, vascular remodeling, and cancer (1
, 6, 7, 8
, 10
, 19)
. In this study, we assessed the distribution of OPN protein by immunohistochemistry in a large variety of human tumor types from different anatomical sites. We used tissue array technology, which allows studies of this magnitude to be performed at a reasonable cost and has the advantage of minimizing experimental variations. For these reasons, we were able to compare OPN expression among many tumors of different type or derivation.
Our findings demonstrate that OPN is expressed in a large percentage of the tumor types studied. Significant cytoplasmic OPN staining was observed in all of the gastric tumors but also in a large percentage of colon, pancreatic, renal, lung, endometrial, esophageal, and head and neck carcinomas. Conversely, high OPN staining was identified in only a few cases of the corresponding normal tissues (7 of 113). We also found OPN expression to be low or negative in the majority of breast, skin, and salivary gland tumors. This finding is consistent with previous studies that focused on OPN levels in breast tumor tissue (6
, 26
, 36)
, which found that OPN levels were low in breast tumors. Tuck et al. (26)
, using the same OPN antibody as used in the current study, reported that only 26% of 154 lymph node-negative breast tumors had any OPN staining in the tumor cells themselves, whereas the majority of tumors showed some staining in infiltrating macrophages and/or lymphocytes, and only 7% of the tumors showed OPN staining in the tumor cells with an Allred score of >4. Interestingly, however, in that study, using this as a cutoff score, elevated OPN was found to correlate with shorter disease-free and overall survival, suggesting that the presence of OPN even in a minority of tumor cells can be associated with poor patient survival. In agreement with previous reports and using a similar cutoff score (see Table 1
), we also observed OPN staining in a minority of breast tumor cells as well as in the peritumoral chronic inflammatory infiltrate (26
, 36)
, suggesting that both cell types may contribute to the OPN tissue production levels. Early reports have described positive OPN protein-staining cancer cells lacking OPN mRNA (38)
, suggesting that the OPN is produced by peritumoral inflammatory cells and is subsequently phagocytized by tumor cells. Others, however, have recently demonstrated the production of OPN mRNA in ovarian cancer cells and have proposed OPN as a diagnostic marker for ovarian cancer (25)
. Therefore, additional molecular studies are required to definitively demonstrate the cell/cells responsible for OPN protein synthesis. In this study, we show that whatever the origin of OPN synthesis (tumor cells, peritumoral inflammatory cells, or both), the increased OPN expression positively correlates with tumor stage when considering nearly all sites (bladder, colon, kidney, larynx, and salivary glands). We also confirm the previously reported significant correlation of OPN with colon cancer stage (P = 0.004; Ref. 5
; Fig. 2
). It was not possible to estimate the exact correlation between OPN score and the tumor stage of a subset of specific site groupings (bile duct, brain, esophagus, lip, liver, prostate, skin, and thyroid), because all samples from these tumor types had identical stages. Interestingly, the mouth cancers demonstrated a significant negative correlation with OPN expression. This finding may indicate that the molecular pathways of progression associated with these cancers may be different from those associated with OPN overexpression.
|
vß3 integrin in endothelial cells. The binding of OPN to
vß3 integrin may also stimulate the migration of vascular smooth muscle cells (19
, 27)
. The importance of OPN in tumorigenicity is supported by in vitro experiments showing that expression of antisense OPN RNA is able to reduce the tumorigenic capability of ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells (25
, 40)
. Furthermore, in vivo studies have demonstrated that OPN is preferentially expressed by tumor cells with invasive and metastatic properties, suggesting that it may be a marker of high-stage cancers (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
, 25) . Recent reports have described estrogen- (41) and progesterone- (42) inhibitory regulation of OPN expression. In agreement with these reports, we found that male and female samples, when analyzed separately, still showed a significant correlation between OPN expression and stage, but the degree of significance was higher in males than females (P = 0.00212 versus P = 0.0224, respectively).
In conclusion, we detected OPN protein in a wide variety of common human tumors. OPN levels were maximal in tumors of gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and gynecological origin and minimal to negative in tumors of skin, brain, and salivary gland. The nearly ubiquitous expression of this protein may reflect its important role in physiological (i.e., bone metabolism and angiogenesis) as well as pathological (i.e., transformation, invasion, and metastasis) processes. Finally, we show, for the first time, a strong correlation between levels of OPN protein and tumor progression in multiple tumor types from different anatomical sites. This conclusion is consistent with our recent report of OPN as the lead candidate for a marker of colon cancer progression, using expression array profiling of multiple colon tumors of a range of stages (5) . Together these findings support the idea that OPN may play a functional role in progression of colon and other tumors. Additional studies to test the validity of OPN as a marker of tumor stage for a variety of tumor types, as well as studies to further clarify the functional role of OPN in tumor cell behavior, are warranted.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Timothy J. Yeatman, Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology/Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, College of Medicine, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612-9497. Phone: (813) 972-8400, extension 7291; E-mail: yeatman{at}moffitt.usf.edu
Received 11/18/02; revised 5/23/03; accepted 9/18/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
heterodimers are specified by dinucleotide differences in the vitamin D-responsive elements of the osteocalcin and osteopontin genes. Mol. Endocrinol., 10: 1444-1456, 1996.[Abstract]

ß3 integrin, osteopontin, and thrombin. Am. J. Pathol., 149: 293-305, 1996.[Abstract]
vß1 and
vß5. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 26232-26238, 1995.
-1). Science (Wash. DC), 271: 509-512, 1996.[Abstract]
-1) protein and murine macrophages in vitro and its effects upon macrophages in vivo. J. Exp. Med., 171: 1931-1942, 1990.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. W. Tun, D. Personett, K. A. Baskerville, D. M. Menke, K. A. Jaeckle, P. Kreinest, B. Edenfield, A. C. Zubair, B. P. O'Neill, W. R. Lai, et al. Pathway analysis of primary central nervous system lymphoma Blood, March 15, 2008; 111(6): 3200 - 3210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-L. Chang, L. Harkins, Y.-H. Hsieh, P. Hicks, K. Sappayatosok, S. Yodsanga, S. Swasdison, A. F. Chambers, C. A. Elmets, and K.-J. Ho Osteopontin Expression in Normal Skin and Non-melanoma Skin Tumors J. Histochem. Cytochem., January 1, 2008; 56(1): 57 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Winfield, F. Kirkland, F. I. Ramos-Ceballos, and T. D. Horn Osteopontin Expression in Spitz Nevi Arch Dermatol, August 1, 2007; 143(8): 1076 - 1077. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Lee, M.-J. Wang, P.-R. Sudhir, G.-D. Chen, C.-W. Chi, and J.-Y. Chen Osteopontin Promotes Integrin Activation through Outside-In and Inside-Out Mechanisms: OPN-CD44V Interaction Enhances Survival in Gastrointestinal Cancer Cells Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 67(5): 2089 - 2097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-T. Liao, L.-B. Song, H.-Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, L. Zhang, W.-L. Liu, Y. Feng, B.-H. Guo, H.-Q. Mai, S.-M. Cao, et al. Centromere Protein H Is a Novel Prognostic Marker for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Progression and Overall Patient Survival Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 508 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Packer, S. Pavey, A. Parker, M. Stark, P. Johansson, B. Clarke, P. Pollock, M. Ringner, and N. Hayward Osteopontin is a downstream effector of the PI3-kinase pathway in melanomas that is inversely correlated with functional PTEN Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2006; 27(9): 1778 - 1786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Allan, R. George, S. A. Vantyghem, M. W. Lee, N. C. Hodgson, C. J. Engel, R. L. Holliday, D. P. Girvan, L. A. Scott, C. O. Postenka, et al. Role of the Integrin-Binding Protein Osteopontin in Lymphatic Metastasis of Breast Cancer Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2006; 169(1): 233 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Mi, H. Guo, P. Y. Wai, C. Gao, and P. C. Kuo Integrin-linked kinase regulates osteopontin-dependent MMP-2 and uPA expression to convey metastatic function in murine mammary epithelial cancer cells Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1134 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. H.C. Bramwell, G. S. Doig, A. B. Tuck, S. M. Wilson, K. S. Tonkin, A. Tomiak, F. Perera, T. A. Vandenberg, and A. F. Chambers Serial plasma osteopontin levels have prognostic value in metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 12(11): 3337 - 3343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ito, Y. Hashimoto, E. Tanaka, T. Kan, S. Tsunoda, F. Sato, M. Higashiyama, T. Okumura, and Y. Shimada An Inducible Short-Hairpin RNA Vector against Osteopontin Reduces Metastatic Potential of Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma In vitro and In vivo Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 12(4): 1308 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Khodavirdi, Z. Song, S. Yang, C. Zhong, S. Wang, H. Wu, C. Pritchard, P. S. Nelson, and P. Roy-Burman Increased Expression of Osteopontin Contributes to the Progression of Prostate Cancer Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 883 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S E Bojesen, S K Kjaer, E V S Hogdall, B L Thomsen, C K Hogdall, J Blaakaer, A Tybjaerg-Hansen, and B G Nordestgaard Increased risk of ovarian cancer in integrin {beta}3 Leu33Pro homozygotes Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2005; 12(4): 945 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. I. Pass, D. Lott, F. Lonardo, M. Harbut, Z. Liu, N. Tang, M. Carbone, C. Webb, and A. Wali Asbestos exposure, pleural mesothelioma, and serum osteopontin levels. N. Engl. J. Med., October 13, 2005; 353(15): 1564 - 1573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Donati, L. Boldrini, M. Dell'Omodarme, M. C. Prati, P. Faviana, T. Camacci, M. Lucchi, A. Mussi, M. Santoro, F. Basolo, et al. Osteopontin Expression and Prognostic Significance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 11(18): 6459 - 6465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Briese, M. Oberndorfer, C. Patschenik, H. M. Schulte, A. Makrigiannakis, T. Loning, and A.-M. Bamberger Osteopontin Is Colocalized with the Adhesion Molecule CEACAM1 in the Extravillous Trophoblast of the Human Placenta and Enhances Invasion of CEACAM1-Expressing Placental Cells J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5407 - 5413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Hu, D. Lin, J. Yuan, T. Xiao, H. Zhang, W. Sun, N. Han, Y. Ma, X. Di, M. Gao, et al. Overexpression of Osteopontin Is Associated with More Aggressive Phenotypes in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 4646 - 4652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. Fisher, A. Jain, M. Tayback, and N. S. Fedarko Small Integrin Binding Ligand N-Linked Glycoprotein Gene Family Expression in Different Cancers Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 10(24): 8501 - 8511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Mi, H. Guo, P. Y. Wai, C. Gao, J. Wei, and P. C. Kuo Differential Osteopontin Expression in Phenotypically Distinct Subclones of Murine Breast Cancer Cells Mediates Metastatic Behavior J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 2004; 279(45): 46659 - 46667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Pre |