
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
1 Center for Molecular Imaging and Departments of 2 Radiology, 3 Biological Chemistry, 4 Radiation Oncology, and 5 Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and 6 Direct Therapeutics Inc., Redwood City, California
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A recent development in BCNU delivery to solid tumors has been reported that utilizes the approach of solvent-facilitated perfusion (SFP). DTI-015 is a formulation of BCNU in a water-miscible organic solvent vehicle (100% EtOH) that has been shown to facilitate the movement of solubilized BCNU through both water and cell membranes (15, 16, 17, 18, 19) . Direct administration of DTI-015 into the tumor site yields substantially higher concentrations of BCNU within the tumor tissue than is possible with systemic injection, carotid artery infusion, or intratumoral administration in an aqueous phase (16 , 18 , 19 , 20) . Furthermore, although BCNU administered via biodegradable wafers at the time of resection does offer the advantage of targeted chemotherapy, the movement of BCNU is limited by diffusion and has been demonstrated to only penetrate a few millimeters into the underlying tissue (21) . In contrast, evidence suggests that SFP using DTI-015 drives the tumor penetration of BCNU over centimeter distances (18) . Furthermore, DTI-015 has been shown to significantly increase life span in rats with intracerebral T9 tumors (15) , and a phase I/II trial of recurrent malignant gliomas has provided evidence for its antitumoral activity in patients (17) . In this clinical study, the median survival time for recurrent inoperable glioblastoma multiforme patients after DTI-015 treatment was 55 weeks as compared with 25 weeks from historical controls.
One potential difficulty in treating a solid tumor with a direct injection of a chemotherapeutic agent is that it must be delivered to the entire tumor mass and at a sufficient concentration to produce a therapeutic effect. In the case of SFP, it would be advantageous to have a noninvasive surrogate marker that would provide timely information related to the spatial distribution and/or spatial effectiveness of this therapeutic intervention within the tumor mass. Ideally, this marker would provide for assessment of response to therapy throughout the entire tumor mass that precedes tumor volumetric changes. A rapid and robust assay with full three-dimensional information would be ideal for direct intratumoral therapeutic approaches (e.g., DTI-015) because it would provide an opportunity to readminister the treatment to tumor regions that have not received an adequate cytotoxic dose.
Quantitation of tissue water diffusion values has been reported to act as just such a surrogate marker for the early detection of therapeutic response in a variety of animal tumor models (22, 23, 24, 25)
and, more recently, in human clinical studies (26, 27, 28)
. To probe for rapid changes in water diffusion values after DTI-015 treatment, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used because the diffusion values of water within tissue is proportional to the cellular density (26
, 29) . The diffusibility of water within tissue can be noninvasively quantified in terms of an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) by using diffusion MRI techniques. As tumor cells die, the integrity of cell membranes begins to degrade, thereby increasing the amount of the extracellular water fraction, which produces an increase in ADC values (Fig. 1)
. Thus, water mobility within the tumor would increase over time after treatment, and the magnitude of the change would be related to the effectiveness of the therapy as shown in Fig. 1
.
|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal Model.
Intracerebral 9L tumors were induced in male Fischer 344 rats weighing between 125 and 150 g as described previously (3)
. Briefly, 9L cells (105 cells per 5 µL) were implanted in the right forebrain at a depth of 2.5 mm through a 1-mm burr hole. The surgical field was cleaned with 70% EtOH, and the burr hole was filled with bone wax to prevent extracerebral extension of the tumor. There were no animals lost either at implantation or during treatment.
Treatment.
Orthotropic tumors in Fischer 344 rats were grown to approximately 40 to 90 µL in volume, as determined by T2-weighted images. Tumor volumes were calculated and used for determination of intratumoral injection volumes of DTI-015 (67 mg BCNU/mL EtOH) or vehicle as described in the phase I/II clinical trial of DTI-015 in recurrent high-grade glioma (17)
. MRI anatomic scans were also used to define the injection coordinates for insertion of the needle at the center of the tumor mass. Three treatment groups were established: DTI-015 (n = 4), EtOH (n = 5), and sham (n = 4). The DTI-015 group of rats received intratumoral DTI-015 delivered at a volume of 50% of the tumor volume up to a maximum of 30 µL under stereotactic guidance. The EtOH group of rats received intratumoral injection of 100% EtOH, using the same 50% tumor volume criteria up to a maximum of 30 µL. The sham group received intratumoral placement of the needle as another control arm. All intratumoral injections were given with the needle tip positioned in the center of the tumor mass with an infusion flow rate of 7.5 µL/minute.
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Images were acquired pre- and posttreatment at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours and then 3 times per week thereafter on a Varian Unity Inova imaging system equipped with a 7.0-Tesla, 18.3-cm horizontal bore magnet and a quadrature bird cage coil (USA Instruments, Aurora, OH). For MRI examination, rats were anesthetized with an isofluorane/air mixture and maintained at 37°C inside the magnet using a heated, thermostatted circulating water bath. A single-slice gradient-echo sequence was used to confirm proper animal positioning and to prescribe subsequent imaging. An isotropic, diffusion weighted sequence (22)
was used with two interleaved b-factors (
= 1,148 s/mm2) and the following acquisition parameters: TR/TE = 3500/60 milliseconds, 128 x 128 matrix, and a 3-cm field-of-view. Thirteen 1-mmthick slices separated by a 0.5-mm gap were used to cover the whole rat brain. The z gradient first moment was zeroed to reduce the dominant source of motion artifact. To further reduce motion artifact, a 32-point navigator echo was prepended to each phase-encode echo. The phase deviation of each navigator echo relative to their mean was subtracted from the respective image echoes before the phase-encode Fourier transform. Isotropic ADC maps were calculated for each image set, and ADC pixel value histograms were generated from tumor regions of interest combined across slices.
The tumor boundary was manually defined on each slice using a region-of-interest tool, and then integrated across slices to provide a volume estimate.
Statistical Methods.
One-way analysis of variance was used to compare pretreatment volumes and ADC between the three groups. Survival differences among the three groups are compared using the log-rank statistic. After 29 to 30 days, any animal surviving was sacrificed, and this time was taken to be the censoring time.
Posttreatment volume changes and ADC changes are analyzed using a mixed effects longitudinal model in SAS Proc Mixed. The models fit are as follows: volume = group + time + time2 + time x group + time2 x group + error, and ADC = group + time + time2 + time x group + time2 x group + error.
In these models, group is an indicator variable taking the three groups values (sham, EtOH, and DTI-015) and is the model intercept. Furthermore, each animal is given its own random intercept. Of primary interest in these models are the contrasts between the interaction terms. More specifically, the time x group and time2 x group interactions that show changes in volume growth and ADC over time between the three different treatment arms.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Histologic sections taken from a slice approximately corresponding to the MRI scans of each animal from Fig. 2A
are shown in Fig. 2C
. The presence of a significant tumor burden for the sham- and EtOH-treated animals is easily observed along with minimal regions of necrosis. However, for the animal treated with DTI-015, the macroscopic analysis revealed a fluid-filled cystic region instead of a tumor mass, which is similar to previous findings (15)
. Further microscopic examination of this DTI-015treated tumor demonstrated no viable tumor cells within the cystic region or within adjacent normal brain tissue.
Effects of DTI-015 on Tumor Growth and ADC Values using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
The data from Fig. 2
represent individual representative animals. To more carefully evaluate the effect of DTI-015 on intracerebral 9L tumors, volumes were quantified and compared with sham and EtOH groups, as shown in Fig. 3A
. Administration of EtOH had a slight but insignificant effect on tumor growth rate over time. However, treatment of tumors with DTI-015 resulted in an inhibition of tumor growth within 2 days after treatment, with subsequent regression occurring over the next 20 days. Animals were sacrificed at the end of 30 days for histologic analysis, and only one out of the four DTI-015treated animals had residual tumor regrowth.
|
Animal Survival.
Overall, there was no significant difference in the pretreatment tumor volumes among the three groups of animals (P = 0.22). The DTI-015treated group lived significantly longer than the sham and EtOH groups (P = 0.007 and P = 0.005, respectively), as shown in the Kaplan-Meier survival curve displayed in Fig. 4
. Additionally, no statistically significant difference in survival between the sham and EtOH groups was found (P = 0.06). All DTI-015treated animals survived for the entire experimental period, except for one animal that died of non-cancerrelated death 2 days before the planned end point. This animal had no radiologic or pathological evidence of tumor on postmortem exam. From the DTI-015treated group, only one animal had evidence of recurrent or residual tumor as documented by both MRI and histopathologic analysis (see below).
|
1.7 was associated with complete loss of viable tumor cells on histologic analysis, whereas smaller ADC values were associated with subsequent tumor regrowth (22
, 26)
.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Systemic chemotherapy has been demonstrated to offer only minimal improvement in time to progression and overall survival with a recent meta-analysis of the randomized trials of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in high-grade glioma, revealing only an absolute 6% increase in survival at 1 year and a 2-month increase in overall median survival from 12 to 14 months (5) . Given the predominant local recurrence of high-grade gliomas with rare intra- or extracerebral spread, there was initial enthusiasm for targeted chemotherapy using carotid artery infusion (11) , implanted biodegradable wafers (13) , or direct injection using convection enhanced delivery with aqueous solutions (12) . In theory, these would offer an enhanced tumor to systemic ratio of the chemotherapeutic agents and may provide both increased efficacy and decreased normal tissue toxicity.
Unfortunately, these treatments, to date, have been unable to provide significant advances over systemic chemotherapy. Intracarotid administration of BCNU only resulted in a 4-fold increase in tumor to systemic ratio for BCNU (31) and was associated with a high risk of neurologic complications or unilateral blindness (9 , 10) . Direct intratumoral injection of BCNU in an aqueous solvent has been demonstrated to result only in limited spread of the drug from the injected site and no significant improvement in therapeutic index when compared with systemic administration (20) . Moreover, the solubility of BCNU in aqueous solution is very small versus EtOH. In addition, the volume of aqueous solution (10% EtOH) that can be injected into the tumor is also smaller as compared with absolute EtOH due to differences in tissue resistance to the different solvent systems. In fact, a recent report used a direct infusion of BCNU in buffer at a rate of 0.3 µL/minute for 2.2 hours for a total delivered volume of 40 µL (32) . The concentration of BCNU in the aqueous formulation was 66 µg/mL versus our current study, which had a concentration of 67,000 µg/mL. Treatment of 9L tumors using SFP of DTI-015 provided cures in four of five animals with no central nervous system or systemic toxicity, whereas the previous study using BCNU dissolved in buffer yielded no cures. Biodegradable BCNU containing wafers did produce a minimal 2.3-month increase in median survival over resection and radiotherapy alone in a recent randomized trial, but this is similar in nature to that seen when BCNU is administered systemically (5 , 14) . The limited response of the BCNU wafers may be due to the fact that there is minimal depth of penetration of BCNU from these wafers into the surrounding tissue (21) , which most certainly is inadequate, given the infiltrative nature of high-grade diffuse gliomas (1) .
SFP utilizes a water-miscible organic solvent that more easily moves through both water and cellular membranes to deliver the solubilized anticancer drug throughout the tumor. DTI-015 has been demonstrated to offer a 164-fold increase in BCNU-produced adducts within experimental rodent fibrosarcomas compared with systemic administration of the drug (16) , and increased levels of DNA adducts were also identified in humans even up to 2 cm from the site of injection (18) . Furthermore, despite this high local concentration, there was limited spread of DTI-015 into normal brain parenchyma (19) . In addition, the increased levels of BCNU within the tumor after direct intratumoral administration of DTI-015 have translated into substantial responses in preclinical models (15 , 20) .
A previous report on the use of DTI-015 in a rodent gliosarcoma model, similar to the one used here, demonstrated a 400% increase in animal survival and a 44% long-term cure rate (15) . One limitation of that study was that the injections were performed in an unguided manner through the burr hole used for tumor cell inoculation. In fact, this blind administration of DTI-015 may actually have underestimated the efficacy of the treatment because it was demonstrated that some tumors were largely missed by the treatment and resulted in minimal efficacy, unchecked tumor growth, and early demise. Indeed, histologic analysis revealed three main groups of animals: a first group in which only the top of the tumor was treated; a second group in which the center of the tumor was treated, but there were residual cells at the margins; and a final group in which no viable tumor cells were evident, and the tumor mass was replaced with a cyst. It is likely that only this final group had a direct injection within the tumor mass and experienced the full benefit of the therapy. This heterogeneity of response is seen in the survival curve, which has at least three different slopes (likely corresponding to partial tumor injection and partial response), with animals succumbing to disease before a plateau phase with long-term survival (corresponding to direct tumor injection and complete response; ref. 15 ).
Through the use of image-guided therapy, we were able to assure that the injection occurred within the center of the tumor in three-dimensional space. Because changes in tumor cellularity after treatment have been previously shown to correlate with changes in cell density/membrane integrity (26) , we investigated the use of quantitating spatial changes in ADC values for assessing tumor response to DTI-015. In addition, by using DWI to follow the cellular changes in response to therapy, we, for the first time, document the rapid response of the implanted brain tumors to this therapy. As early as 24 hours after injection, there were statistically significant differences in the ADC values between the treated animals and both control groups that preceded volumetric differences by several days. The rise in ADC was uniform across the tumor in most animals, except for the one documented "near miss" due to a ventral tumor lobe outside the main tumor mass. The peak rise in ADC was similar to that seen previously using a much higher and more toxic systemic injection of BCNU (26) . However, in that study, despite reaching a similar peak ADC value, it was maintained only for approximately 6 days, with a subsequent fall of ADC with an eventual return to the pretreatment values by 3 weeks after treatment, which coincided with tumor regrowth. Not surprisingly, in that study BCNU was only minimally effective when administered systemically, with no long-term survival. This is in contrast to the present study, in which ADC rose dramatically over the first week after treatment and was maintained at this elevated level for at least an additional 2 weeks. Because ADC represents the diffusibility of water, there is an upper limit to this value as one approaches a completely acellular environment; therefore, as treatments approach this value, it is not surprising that different treatments achieve similar peaks, but the duration of a sustained response is predictive of both increased cytotoxicity and durability of response (26) . Furthermore, the elevation in ADC was not only predictive of improved efficacy between treated groups but also was predictive of heterogenous responses within individual animals as witnessed by tumor regrowth from a small ventral tumor lobe that exhibited only relatively mild changes in ADC after treatment. The spatial and temporal nature of DWI could potentially be used to offer retreatment to areas that were initially missed or were minimally responsive to therapy.
In conclusion, using image-guided intratumoral delivery of DTI-015 followed by close monitoring with DWI offers further evidence for the efficacy of DTI-015 in high-grade gliomas. In addition, the use of noninvasive imaging to follow cellular changes to therapy offers an exciting means to more rapidly and accurately predict clinical responses to DTI-015 and to direct other therapies within individual tumors. More importantly, this study provides further evidence for the utility of DWI for the evaluation of treatment response in brain tumors; this utility is not limited to preclinical models but can also be directly translated into clinical practice to facilitate the design and evaluation of further randomized trials using DTI-015 or other interventions for brain tumors (26, 27, 28) .
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Brian D. Ross, The University of Michigan, Center for Molecular Imaging, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, 9303 MSRB III, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0648. Phone: 734-763-2099; Fax: 734-647-2563; E-mail: bdross{at}umich.edu
Received 6/22/04; revised 8/23/04; accepted 8/31/04.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Lazovic, M. C. Jensen, E. Ferkassian, B. Aguilar, A. Raubitschek, and R. E. Jacobs Imaging Immune Response In vivo: Cytolytic Action of Genetically Altered T Cells Directed to Glioblastoma Multiforme Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3832 - 3839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Hamstra, A. Rehemtulla, and B. D. Ross Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Biomarker for Treatment Response in Oncology J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2007; 25(26): 4104 - 4109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. McConville, D. Hambardzumyan, J. B. Moody, W. R. Leopold, A. R. Kreger, M. J. Woolliscroft, A. Rehemtulla, B. D. Ross, and E. C. Holland Magnetic Resonance Imaging Determination of Tumor Grade and Early Response to Temozolomide in a Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Glioma Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 2897 - 2904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Soussain, L. L. Muldoon, C. Varallyay, K. Jahnke, L. DePaula, and E. A. Neuwelt Characterization and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of a Rat Model of Human B-Cell Central Nervous System Lymphoma Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 13(8): 2504 - 2511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Lee, D. A. Hamstra, M. S. Bhojani, A. P. Khan, B. D. Ross, and A. Rehemtulla Noninvasive Molecular Imaging Sheds Light on the Synergy between 5-Fluorouracil and TRAIL/Apo2L for Cancer Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2007; 13(6): 1839 - 1846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Lee, B. A. Moffat, A. F. Schott, R. Layman, S. Ellingworth, R. Juliar, A. P. Khan, M. Helvie, C. R. Meyer, T. L. Chenevert, et al. Prospective Early Response Imaging Biomarker for Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 443 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Bodell, A. P. Bodell, and D. D. Giannini Levels and distribution of BCNU in GBM tumors following intratumoral injection of DTI-015 (BCNU-ethanol) Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 12 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Lee, D. E. Hall, B. A. Hoff, B. A. Moffat, S. Sharma, T. L. Chenevert, C. R. Meyer, W. R. Leopold, T. D. Johnson, R. V. Mazurchuk, et al. Dynamic Imaging of Emerging Resistance during Cancer Therapy. Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 66(9): 4687 - 4692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Cao, P. C. Sundgren, C. I. Tsien, T. T. Chenevert, and L. Junck Physiologic and Metabolic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Gliomas J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2006; 24(8): 1228 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Hamstra, T. L. Chenevert, B. A. Moffat, T. D. Johnson, C. R. Meyer, S. K. Mukherji, D. J. Quint, S. S. Gebarski, X. Fan, C. I. Tsien, et al. Evaluation of the functional diffusion map as an early biomarker of time-to-progression and overall survival in high-grade glioma PNAS, November 15, 2005; 102(46): 16759 - 16764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A S K Dzik-Jurasz Pelvic malignancy: integrating form and function Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(Special_Issue_2): S86 - S93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |