
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Dependent
Departments of 1 Pathology, 2 Radiotherapy/Oncology, and 3 Surgery, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece; and 4 Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences and 5 Cancer Research United Kingdom, Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(HIF1
) production (Laughner et al., Mol Cell Biol 2001;21:39954005). We investigated the clinical correlate of this observation to assess whether c-erbB-2 expression was related to HIF1
expression, angiogenesis, and prognosis. A series of 180 breast carcinomas of known c-erbB-2 status (90 c-erbB-2positive and 90 c-erbB-2negative carcinomas) were stained immunohistochemically for HIF1
and CD31 endothelial cell antigen. c-erbB-2 positivity was clearly related to HIF1
protein expression and high angiogenesis. However, prognosis was decreased only in cases with simultaneous c-erbB-2 and HIF1
expression. If activation of c-erbB-2 in humans results in overexpression of HIF1
independently of conditions of hypoxia, as occur in experimental studies, this interaction may represent a main pathway conferring clinical aggressiveness to c-erbB-2positive breast tumors. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and HIF1ß (4)
. Increased intracellular content of the HIF1
occurs after hypoxic stimulation, whereas HIF1ß is present constitutively and remains, by and large, unaffected by reduced oxygen tension. Hypoxic augmentation of HIF1
protein levels is a result of reduced rates of degradation by the ubiquitin-dependent proteasome pathway rather than increased mRNA transcription or translation (5)
. Nevertheless, HIF1
stabilization or even overexpression may occur by mechanisms independent of hypoxic conditions. von Hippel-Lindau protein mutations (6)
, for example, and the activation of HIFs by mitogen-activated protein kinases (7)
or the insulin-like growth factor-2 pathway (8)
are involved in the persistent HIF induction, despite the restoration of oxygenated conditions.
The c-erbB-2 gene (also known as neu or HER-2), the second member of the c-erbB/EGFR family of transmembrane proteins with tyrosine kinase activity (9)
, is also thought to participate in the regulation of HIF1
expression. Experimental evidence suggests that neutralizing antibodies against the c-erbB-2 or the EGFR result in down-regulation of angiogenesis, probably through suppression of the VEGF gene (10)
. Another mechanism for growth factor receptors to modulate angiogenesis is that mediated by HER-2 regulation of HIF1 expression, with increased translational efficiency (11)
. However, this work is on cell lines, and clinical relevance of this interaction has not been investigated.
Investigating the expression of these proteins in human tumors is important for they may participate in intense activation of metabolic and pathogenic pathways related to invasion, metastasis and cancer cell survival. In this study, we examined the expression patterns of HIF1
protein and tumor angiogenicity with respect to c-erbB-2 protein membrane overexpression, providing evidence in support of a close coactivation of these pathways in breast carcinomas.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and CD31 endothelial cell antigen. The results were interrelated with c-erbB-2 and correlated with prognosis. Survival data were available in 146 of 180 patients with a minimum follow up period of 12 months.
Immunohistochemistry.
Sections were cut at 3 µm and stained immunohistochemically with the following techniques: (a) a standard streptavidin-biotin method for the detection of HIF1
, c-erbB-2, and estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor; refs. 12, 13, 14
), and (b) the alkaline phosphatase/antialkaline phosphatase method for microvessel staining (15)
. Details of the primary antibodies, the working dilutions, and the antigen retrieval methods used are given in Table 1
.
|
The Streptavidin-Biotin Method.
Sections were dewaxed, and endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with methanol and 3% H2O2 for 15 minutes. Antigen retrieval was achieved by microwave treatment (three treatments for 4 minutes each). The primary antibody (1:20) was applied for 75 minutes at room temperature or overnight at 4°C (see Table 1
). After washing with Tris buffered saline (TBS), sections were incubated with a secondary antirabbit antimouse antibody (Kwik biotinylated secondary; Shandon-Upshaw, Pittsburgh, PA) for 15 minutes and washed in TBS. The Kwik Streptavidin peroxidase reagent (Shandon-Upshaw) was applied for 15 minutes, and sections were again washed in TBS. The color was developed by a 15-minute incubation with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine solution, and the sections were weakly counterstained with hematoxylin.
The Alkaline Phosphatase/Antialkaline Phosphatase Method.
The JC70 monoclonal antibody (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), which recognizes the CD31 pan endothelial antigen (platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1), and the alkaline phosphatase/antialkaline phosphatase procedure were used for blood vessel staining. Sections were dewaxed, rehydrated, and predigested with protease type XXIV (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) for 20 minutes at 37°C. The JC70 (1:20 dilution) was applied at room temperature for 30 minutes and washed in TBS. Rabbit antimouse antibody 1:50 (v/v) was applied for 30 minutes, followed by application of mouse alkaline phosphatase/antialkaline phosphatase complex 1:1 (v/v) for 30 minutes (Dako). After washing in TBS, the last two steps were repeated for 10 minutes each. The color was developed by incubation with New Fuchsin solution for 20 minutes.
| Assessment of Antigen Reactivity. |
|---|
|
|
|---|
.
expression is purely cytoplasmic or mixed cytoplasmic and nuclear. Nuclear reactivity was scored as present (positive) or absent (negative). Cytoplasmic reactivity, when present (positive) was scored as weak and strong. The percentage of tumor cells showing nuclear or strong cytoplasmic HIF
reactivity was recorded semi-quantitatively at x200 magnification after examining the entire histologic section. Table 2
reactivity (negative) were grouped in the same category with those having weak cytoplasmic reactivity.
|
c-erbB-2.
The percentage of tumor cells with a distinct membrane staining was recorded in all optical fields, and the mean value was calculated. Tissue samples with a mean value
20% were considered as positive for c-erbB-2 protein expression and were classed into three grades: tumors of low c-erbB-2 reactivity (2035% positive cells); tumors of intermediate c-erbB-2 reactivity (3650% positive cells); and tumors of high c-erbB-2 reactivity (>50% positive cells; ref. 17
). For the purpose of this study, only tumors with a high c-erbB-2 reactivity were included in the positive group; these criteria define a subgroup of breast cancer patients having increased risk of recurrence and decreased overall survival (18)
.
Estrogen receptor, Progesterone Receptor.
Positivity was indicated as a distinct brown nuclear staining of neoplastic cells. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor values above 10% were considered as positive (12)
.
Lactate Dehydrogenase-5.
To confirm the functionality of HIF1
, the expression of lactate dehydrogenase-5 (LDH5) was assessed in 30 cases with high and 30 cases with low HIF1
expression, as described previously (19
, 20) . LDH5 is transcriptionally regulated by HIF1
(21
, 22)
. The sheep polycloncal ab9002 (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) raised against human LDH5 purified from human placenta was used for immunohistochemistry (23)
. Ab9002 is an IgG fraction, the identity of which was confirmed by double diffusion against purified LDH5 and a known antihuman LDH5. Specificity has been done by Western blot against liver cell lysate. The cytoplasmic and/or nuclear expression of LDH5 was assessed in all fields, and the median percentage of positive cells was taken into account to define two groups of low and high LDH5 reactivity. Details on scoring have been reported previously (19)
.
Statistical Analysis.
We did statistical analysis using the GraphPad Prism 2.01 package (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). A Fishers exact test or unpaired two-tailed t test was used for testing relationships between noncontinuous categorical (contingency tables) and continuous categorical (comparison of the mean values from two sets of data) tumor variables, respectively. We plotted survival curves using the method of Kaplan and Meier, and the log-rank test was used to determine statistical differences between life tables. The end points were the overall survival from the day of surgery. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the effect of tumor variables on overall survival. A P value of <0.05 was used for significance.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
reactivity, as defined in Table 2
expression was nuclear/cytoplasmic, or nuclear and cytoplasmic (Fig. 1)
was confirmed by correlating the HIF1
with LDH5 expression in parallel tumor sections. Of 30 cases with HIF1
expression, strong LDH5 cancer cell reactivity was noted in 26 cases (86.6%). On the contrary only 9 of 30 (30%) cases with low HIF1
reactivity were reactive for LDH5 (P < 0.001; Fishers exact test).
|
The HIF1
expression in breast carcinomas was associated with an increased incidence of multiple (>4) lymph node metastases but not with the size of the primary tumor or the histologic grade (Table 3)
. There was also a strong association of HIF1
with c-erbB-2 and increased vascular density (Table 4)
. An inverse association between HIF1
and c-erbB-2 with estrogen receptor was also noted.
|
|
or high c-erbB-2 reactivity was associated significantly with poorer prognosis (Fig. 2A and B)
and c-erbB-2 reactivity, showed that only the simultaneous overexpression of these factors was associated with poor prognosis (Fig. 2C)
|
|
and c-erbB-2 did not show an independent significance, probably because of their close correlation. However, when the HIF-1
/c-erbB-2 status was taken as a single variable in a multivariate model, the combined variable was an independent prognostic factor (Table 5)| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
protein and the downstream molecular cascade were activated in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, following c-erbB-2 stimulation by its ligands (11)
. This effect was the net result of increased HIF1
synthesis; the half-life of HIF1
protein remained unaffected. Furthermore, the increased HIF1
transcription rate was dependent on the activity of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, AKT (protein kinase B), and its effector FKBP-rapamycinassociated protein (FRAP; ref. 11
). Zhong et al. (26)
showed in human prostate cancer cells that basal-, growth factor-, and mitogen-induced transcription of HIF1
was blocked by LY294002 and rapamycin, inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and FRAP, respectively. In this context, it is most interesting that treatment of two breast cancer patients with Herceptin, a monoclonal antibody blocking the membrane expression c-erbB-2, resulted in disappearance of the HIF1
immunohistochemical staining (27)
.
It seems, therefore, that HIF1
overexpression in c-erbB-2positive human breast carcinomas may result from tyrosine kinase receptor activation, independently of intratumoral hypoxic conditions. This finding suggests that the unfavorable prognosis of breast carcinomas with c-erbB-2 amplification and overexpression may not be attributed simply to activated proliferation and migration pathways (24
, 25)
, but other pathways, mediated through the activation of a down-stream HIF1
transcription of proteins related to angiogenesis, glycolysis, and inhibition of apoptosis, may be of equal importance (28)
. It is notable that in our study, both HIF1
and c-erbB-2 overexpression were associated with an intensified intratumoral angiogenesis.
The direct association of c-erbB-2 expression with HIF1
reactivity has been raised in earlier clinicopathologic studies in breast and lung carcinomas (29
, 30)
. A more recent study by Bos et al. (31)
confirmed this association in breast carcinomas. c-erbB-2 is a marker of decreased overall survival (18)
and an indicator of resistance of breast carcinomas to chemotherapy, antiestrogen treatment, and radiotherapy (32
, 33)
. HIF1
is another marker linked with poor survival in breast cancer patients (31
, 34)
. In our study, both c-erbB-2 and HIF1
were associated with unfavorable prognosis. Combined analysis, however, revealed that the poor survival was only for tumors exhibiting c-erbB-2 and HIF1
reactivity simultaneously. Although these findings should be confirmed in other series of patients, current evidence suggests that c-erbB-2mediated tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer should be attributed partly to HIF1
activation. The coactivation of angiogenesis and migration pathways in the HIF1
(+)/c-erbB-2(+) group of patients may be the reason for the ominous prognosis of this group. High angiogenesis in absence of cancer cell migration ability (i.e., c-erbB-2 negativity) or, high migration ability in lack of intense angiogenic potential may result in reduced metastatic or impaired installation ability of cancer cells in distant organs, respectively. Indeed, in the present study, cases with highVD/c-erbB-2(+) phenotype had a significantly poorer survival than highVD/c-erbB-2() and lowVD/c-erbB-2(+) ones (data not shown). The intense anaerobic metabolism and intratumoral acidity, predicted by the HIF1
and LDH5 up-regulation, or the resistance of HIF1
+ cancer cells to apoptotic stimuli may also account for the poorer survival in the HIF1
(+)/c-erbB-2(+) group (35
, 36)
.
As several inhibitors of the HIF1
are in the preclinical and clinical stage of development (37)
, the coactivation and cooperation of c-erbB-2 and HIF1
in the development of a clinically aggressive tumor phenotype underlines the eventual therapeutic benefit from a double blocking of this pathway.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Requests for reprints: Alexandra Giatromanolaki, P.O. Box 12, Alexandroupolis 68100, Greece. Phone: 0030-25510-75118; Fax: 0030-25510-30349; E-mail: targ{at}her.forthnet.g
Received 6/ 1/04; revised 8/16/04; accepted 9/ 2/04.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/VEGF pre-treatment status?. Anticancer Res 23 1673-80.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Zhang, D. Z. Qian, Y. S. Tan, K. Lee, P. Gao, Y. R. Ren, S. Rey, H. Hammers, D. Chang, R. Pili, et al. Inaugural Article: Digoxin and other cardiac glycosides inhibit HIF-1{alpha} synthesis and block tumor growth PNAS, December 16, 2008; 105(50): 19579 - 19586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Brennan, K. Jirstrom, A. Kronblad, R. C. Millikan, G. Landberg, M. J. Duffy, L. Ryden, W. M. Gallagher, and S. L. O'Brien CA IX is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients with One to Three Positive Lymph Nodes and a Putative Marker of Radiation Resistance. Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 12(21): 6421 - 6431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Koukourakis, A. Giatromanolaki, E. Sivridis, K. C. Gatter, and A. L. Harris Lactate Dehydrogenase 5 Expression in Operable Colorectal Cancer: Strong Association With Survival and Activated Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pathway--A Report of the Tumour Angiogenesis Research Group J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2006; 24(26): 4301 - 4308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Spangenberg, E. U. Lausch, T. M. Trost, D. Prawitt, A. May, R. Keppler, S. A. Fees, D. Reutzel, C. Bell, S. Schmitt, et al. ERBB2-Mediated Transcriptional Up-regulation of the {alpha}5{beta}1 Integrin Fibronectin Receptor Promotes Tumor Cell Survival Under Adverse Conditions. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 66(7): 3715 - 3725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |