Clinical Cancer Research CR Balducci Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sparano, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Comis, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sparano, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Comis, R. L.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 10, 1206-1211, February 2004
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research

Cooperative Group Bulletin Board

Evaluating Antiangiogenesis Agents in the Clinic

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Portfolio of Clinical Trials

Joseph A. Sparano, Robert Gray, Bruce Giantonio, Peter O’Dwyer and Robert L. Comis

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

ABSTRACT

Recent evidence indicates that treatment with a humanized monoclonal antibody (bevacizumab) directed at vascular endothelial growth factor improves response and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer when added to standard chemotherapy, validating angiogenesis as a therapeutic target. Investigators from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) have initiated a number of Phase III studies that will help further define the role of antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of breast, colon, lung, renal, and head and neck cancer, as well as melanoma and myeloma. The agents being evaluated target various biological functions involved in angiogenesis, including vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab), endothelial cell proliferation (thalidomide, IFN-{alpha}), and matrix metalloproteinases (marimastat). These clinical trials include correlative laboratory studies aimed at elucidating how these agents may exert their clinical effects. The portfolio of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group studies will serve to further define the role of this therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced cancer.

Introduction

It has been 30 years since Folkman hypothesized that the tumor vasculature was a good target for developing therapeutic strategies to treat human cancer (1) . Although this hypothesis initially was met with skepticism, greater interest slowly developed over the years in developing novel treatment approaches targeting tumor-associated angiogenesis by a variety of different approaches (2) . A great deal of public interest developed in 1998 when a front page article in the Sunday edition of New York Times announced "Hope in the Lab: A Special Report—A Cautious Awe Greets Drugs that Eradicate Tumors in Mice" (3) . This heightened interest came at a time when many new antiangiogenic agents first entered the clinic. Although the specific agents that led to great excitement (e.g., endostatin) have not realized their lofty expectations (4, 5, 6) , many studies evaluating antiangiogenic agents are currently in progress. It has also been recognized that many commonly used antineoplastic agents have potent antiangiogenic properties (7) , and, in some cases, the basis for these antiangiogenic effects have been elucidated (8) . This has served to challenge our notion as to how best to administer these agents to exploit both their cytotoxic and antiangiogenic properties. The topic has been extensively reviewed in the basic science and clinical literature (9 , 10) .

Investigators from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) have initiated or completed a number of Phase III studies that will help define the role of antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of advanced breast, colon, lung, and renal cancer, and are planning studies for early-stage breast and colon cancer. For the most part, the studies in advanced disease used time to disease progression rather than objective response as the primary clinical end point, reflecting our expectation that these agents would not induce tumor regression but, rather, stabilize their growth. The agents being evaluated target various biological functions involved in angiogenesis, including vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab), endothelial cell proliferation (thalidomide, IFN-{alpha}), and metalloproteinases (marimastat; Table 1Citation ). The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of these studies for clinicians engaged in clinical research, to review the premise that led to the study designs, and to review the correlative laboratory studies that may lead to an improved understanding of how these agents exert their effects.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 Randomized clinical trials evaluating antiangiogenesis agents

 
Bevacizumab

Two Phase III studies that evaluated the role of bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed at vascular endothelial growth factor, have been reported. A trial presented at the 2003 American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting demonstrated a survival benefit when bevacizumab was combined with standard chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (11) . The study included more than 900 patients who received irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL) plus bevacizumab (n = 412), or IFL plus a placebo (n = 403); a third arm that included 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus bevacizumab was discontinued after accrual of 110 patients when the IFL regimen was proven to be superior to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (12) . The IFL-bevacizumab arm was associated with improved response rate (45% versus 35%; P = 0.0029), median response duration (10.4 versus 7.1 months; P = 0.0014), median time to disease progression (10.6 versus 6.2 months; P < 0.00001), and median overall survival (20.3 versus 15.6 months; P = 0.00003). The addition of bevacizumab was associated with a significantly greater incidence of grade 3 hypertension (10.9% versus 2.3%), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of thrombosis (19.3% versus 16.1%), grade 3 bleeding (3.1% versus 2.5%), or proteinuria (0.8% in both arms). A second trial presented at the 2002 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium compared capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus bevacizumab as in 462 patients with metastatic breast cancer who had no more than two previous chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease (13) . Although the addition of bevacizumab resulted in a significant improvement in objective response rate (20% versus 10%), there was no significant difference in median time to disease progression (the primary end point) or overall survival.

Other trials have also suggested that bevacizumab may have activity in other diseases. A randomized Phase II trial that compared two doses of bevacizumab (3 or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) with a placebo infusion in 110 patients with metastatic renal cell cancer demonstrated a significant improvement in median time to disease progression for patients treated with the 10-mg/kg bevacizumab dose compared with placebo (median, 4.8 versus 2.5 months; P < 0.001; Ref. 14 ). A randomized Phase II trial in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that compared carboplatin/paclitaxel alone or in combination with bevacizumab suggested an improvement in median time to disease progression for patients in the bevacizumab arm (15) .

The results of the colorectal trial and renal cell trial have clearly validated angiogenesis as a therapeutic target. The ECOG is currently performing several Phase III trials evaluating bevacizumab as a component of therapy for patients with advanced breast, colon, and NSCLC. Previous studies have demonstrated the safety of combining bevacizumab with IFL (16) and with oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4; Ref. 17 ), as well as combining bevacizumab with carboplatin/paclitaxel in NSCLC of the non-squamous cell type (18) . In the NSCLC trial, there was an excess risk of fatal pulmonary hemorrhage in patients with squamous cell histology. The trial included 99 patients with advanced NSCLC who were randomized to carboplatin/paclitaxel for six cycles alone or in combination with a low (7.5 mg/kg) or high (15 mg/kg) dose of bevacizumab given every 3 weeks. Twenty % of patients had squamous cell carcinoma. There were six cases of life-threatening hemorrhage in the two bevacizumab-containing arms, four of which proved fatal. Tumor-related bleeding originating from pulmonary tumors may have caused all six events. In a case-control analysis of the data, squamous cell carcinoma and bevacizumab therapy emerged as the most likely factors associated with this complication. For this reason, the current NSCLC study (E4599) includes only patients with non-squamous histology.

Because of concerns regarding disease-specific complications such as pulmonary hemorrhage, and because of other complications associated with bevacizumab such as thrombosis, hypertension, and proteinuria, a safety analysis of four ongoing or completed ECOG studies that included bevacizumab was recently reported (19) . Bevacizumab was used either alone or in combination with standard chemotherapy in 519 patients with breast, colon, and NSCLC (of the non-squamous cell type); there was no significant increase in the risk of thrombosis or bleeding associated with bevacizumab (Table 2)Citation . There were three bleeding-related deaths in the bevacizumab-containing arms, including two deaths from pulmonary hemorrhage in the NSCLC study (E4599) and one death due to central nervous system hemorrhage in the colorectal study (E3200). There was no increased risk of thrombosis. Proteinuria was uncommon and never grade 3 or 4. There was an increased risk of grade 3–4 hypertension, but the incidence was low. The NSCLC study has been amended to exclude patients with a history of gross hemoptysis (defined as bright red blood of a 1/2 teaspoon or more). This analysis has confirmed other reports indicating the safety of using bevacizumab in combination with standard cytotoxic therapy for these disease types.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2 Bevacizumab safety analysis in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) studies.

Hemorrhage and thrombosis/embolism were reported by an expedited adverse event reporting system. The denominator for these toxicities were based on the total number of patients accrued per arm because all grade 3–4 toxicities were reported by this mechanism. The denominator for hypertension indicates the number of case report forms available for review.

 
Thalidomide

The antiangiogenic effects of thalidomide first became evident in the 1950s when pregnant women who took the drug for its approved indication as a sedative bore children who had phicomelia, or deformity of the limbs, because of the inhibition of blood vessel formation in developing limb buds (20) . Subsequent studies have confirmed that the drug inhibits angiogenesis (21) . Although the precise mechanism is unknown, it may exert some of its effects by blocking the action of potent angiogenic factors such as basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor (21 , 22) .

After being removed from the market in Europe in 1962, thalidomide was recently approved in the United States for the treatment of lepromatous leprosy, and has also been found to be effective for the treatment of other neoplastic diseases such as multiple myeloma (23, 24, 25) , and nonneoplastic conditions such as chronic graft versus host disease, apthous ulcers associated with Behçet’s disease, and cachexia associated with advanced HIV infection (26) . For most of these conditions, however, it likely that thalidomide exerts its therapeutic effect by other mechanisms, such as inhibition of tumor necrosis factor {alpha} (27) and transcription factors such as nuclear factor {kappa}B (28) .

The ECOG has initiated several Phase III trials to evaluate the role of thalidomide in a variety of tumor types. For example, E3598 is a Phase III trial that compares sequential and concurrent chemotherapy-irradiation given with and without thalidomide in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. E2998 is a Phase III trial that compares low-dose {alpha}-IFN (1 mµ s.c. twice daily) either alone or in combination with thalidomide in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In addition, E1A00 is a Phase III trial that compares dexamethasone with dexamethasone plus thalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma.

{alpha}-IFN

{alpha}-IFN, a cytokine that has antiangiogenic properties (29) , is known to have activity in diseases for which angiogenesis plays a critical pathophysiological role, such as hemangiomas (30) , melanoma (31) , renal cell carcinoma (32) , and Kaposi’s sarcoma (33) . In addition, several reports have indicated that the combination with other agents such as thalidomide (34) or cis-retinoic acid (35) is associated with enhanced antiangiogenic effect. These considerations have provided the basis for an ECOG studies that have evaluated the role of {alpha}-IFN used in combination with cis-retinoic acid for head and neck carcinoma (E1301), or in combination with thalidomide for renal cell carcinoma (E2898). In addition, based on previous evidence demonstrating a beneficial effect for {alpha}-IFN in high-risk operable malignant melanoma (31) , an ongoing ECOG study is evaluating the role {alpha}-IFN in patients with intermediate-risk disease (E1697).

MMP Inhibitors

The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases that are responsible for degradation and remodeling of the basement membrane and extracellular matrix (36) . MMPs play a critical role in multiple steps in the metastatic cascade and also facilitate neoangiogenesis. Overexpression of MMPs by tumor or tumor-associated stroma has been associated with a worse prognosis in a variety of cancer types, including esophageal (37) , colon (38) , and pancreas (39) . Numerous inhibitors of MMPs have been developed, including marimastat, that bind the zinc atom in the active catalytic domain of most MMPs (40) . The ECOG performed a randomized Phase III trial comparing marimastat with placebo in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had responding or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy (E2196). Marimastat therapy was not associated with an improvement in progression-free survival or overall survival (41) . Only about 20% of patients in the marimastat arm were documented to have a trough plasma marimastat level of at least 40 ng/ml, a level considered therapeutic because there is at least 90% enzyme inhibition for most MMPs above this threshold. Higher marimastat levels were surprisingly found to be associated with an increased risk of death but not progression; higher levels were also associated with an increase in plasma MMP-9, suggesting a compensatory increase in MMP production as a consequence of enzyme inhibition.

A number of reports have indicated no benefit for MMP inhibitors (MMPIs) when used either in combination with chemotherapy or sequentially after first-line chemotherapy in a variety of disease types, including small cell lung (42) , non-small cell lung (43 , 44) , gastric (45) , and pancreatic cancers (46, 47, 48) , as well as glioblastoma multiforme (49) . In fact, two studies demonstrated diminished survival with one MMPI (BAY12-9566) evaluated in pancreatic cancer (when compared with gemcitabine) and small cell lung cancer (when compared with placebo after induction chemotherapy). The disappointing results observed for the MMPIs in clinical trials suggest that we have an incomplete understanding of this target and these agents. No additional trials evaluating MMPIs are currently planned by ECOG, and many pharmaceutical companies have suspended clinical development of these agents.

Correlative Studies in Antiangiogenesis Trials

The ECOG breast cancer study (E2196) illustrates the potential value that correlative studies may have, even when the parent study is negative. Although we might have concluded that an agent was not effective because of failure to achieve "therapeutic"levels, we paradoxically noted a worse survival for those that achieved "therapeutic" levels. In addition, the correlation between a higher marimastat concentration and elevated MMP-9 level provides a potential explanation for this finding. MMP-9 has been reported to function at an "angiogenic switch" (50) . By up-regulating MMP-9 production, the MMPIs may paradoxically serve to enhance rather than inhibit tumor-associated angiogenesis. This may explain the worse survival noted for patients treated with MMPIs that are more specific for MMP-9, such as BAY12-9566 (51) .

Most of the current ECOG studies include correlative studies that are intended to define the prognostic or predictive value of angiogenic factors in tumor, peripheral blood, and urine, and the specific objectives for each trial are outlined in Table 3Citation . Factors that will be evaluated include tumor and circulating vascular endothelial growth factor, other circulating angiogenic factors (vascular cell adhesion molecule, E-selectin, basic fibroblast growth factor, tumor necrosis factor {alpha}), tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase, and other targets. The correlative studies are designed to address the following questions: (a) are pretreatment angiogenic factors in tumor or peripheral blood associated with an adverse prognosis? (b) do pretreatment tumor expression or blood levels of angiogenic factors predict response to antiangiogenic therapy? and (c) does antiangiogenic therapy alter blood levels of angiogenic factors, and does that correlate with response to antiangiogenic therapy? Addressing these important questions will serve to elucidate how these agents exert their effects.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3 Correlative studies

 
Another objective specific to the locally advanced non-small cell trial (E3598) will be to identify genes inactivated by aberrant CpG island methylation as prognostic and predictive markers, and as markers for detecting subclinical disease. For example, inactivation of the p16 tumor suppressor gene is a frequent and early event in the development of squamous cell carcinoma (52) , and aberrant methylation of p16 has been detected in sputum and in DNA recovered from the serum of patients with NSCLC, as well as the sputum from some high-risk, cancer-free subjects (53) . E3598 includes correlative studies that will evaluate aberrant methylation of genes [e.g., p16, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), DAP-kinase, and tissue inhibitor(s) of metalloproteinase-3] within biological fluids and tumor that are designed to address the following questions: (a) will the detection of gene dysfunction in critical genes through analysis of sputum and/or serum be useful for screening?;(b) does inactivation of these critical genes affect response to standard treatment or survival? and (c) can serum methylation markers be useful in diagnosis or in predicting response to an antiangiogenic agent?

Although a more detailed description of the rationale for these correlative studies is beyond the scope of this review, our previous experience highlights the importance of performing such studies when evaluating new therapeutic agents.

Conclusion

The encouraging results observed with a bevacizumab in colorectal cancer and renal cell cancer has validated angiogenesis as a therapeutic target. The current portfolio of ECOG studies will serve to further define the role of this therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced cancer. All of the active studies are currently listed on the Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU) roster, offering the opportunity for any interested investigator to participate in trials evaluating antiangiogenic therapy in advanced breast (E2100), lung (E4599, E3598), and head and neck cancer (E1301), as well as intermediate-risk operable malignant melanoma (E1697).

FOOTNOTES

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Requests for reprints: Joseph A. Sparano, Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Division, Department of Oncology, 2 South, Room 47-48, 1825 Eastchester Road, Bronx, NY 10461. Phone: (718) 904-2555; Fax: (718) 904-2892; E-mail: sparano{at}jimmy.harvard.edu

Received 9/16/03; revised 10/18/03; accepted 10/22/03.

REFERENCES

  1. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N. Engl. J. Med., 285: 1182-1186, 1971.
  2. Scappaticci F. A. Mechanisms and future directions for angiogenesis-based cancer therapies. J. Clin. Oncol., 20: 3906-3927, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kolata, G. Hope in the Lab: A Special Report—A Cautious Awe Greets Drugs that Eradicate Tumors in Mice. New York Times, May 3, 1998.
  4. Twombly R. First clinical trials of endostatin yield lukewarm results. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 20: 1520-1521, 2002.
  5. Herbst R. S., Hess K. R., Tran H. T. Phase I study of recombinant human endostatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol., 20: 3792-3803, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Thomas J. P., Arzoomarian R. Z., Alberti D., Marnocha R., Lee F., Friedl A., et al Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of recombinant human endostatin in patents with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol., 21: 223-231, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Miller K. D., Sweeney C. J, Sledge G. W., Jr. Redefining the target: chemotherapeutics as antiangiogenics. J. Clin. Oncol., 19: 1195-1206, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hotchkiss K. A., Ashton A. W., Mahmood R., Russell R. G., Sparano J. A., Schwartz E. L. Inhibition of endothelial cell function in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo by docetaxel (Taxotere) is associated with impaired repositioning of the mictrotubule organizing center. Mol. Cancer Ther., 1: 1191-1200, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Jain R. K. Molecular regulation of vessel maturation. Nat. Med., 9: 685-693, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Kerbel R., Folkman J. Clinical translation of angiogenesis inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 10: 727-739, 2002.
  11. Fernando N. H., Hurwitz H. I. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor in the treatment of colon cancer. Semin. Oncol., 30 (Suppl. 6): 39-50, 2003.
  12. Saltz L. B., Cox J. V., Blanke C., Rosen L. S., Fehrenbacker L., Moore M. S., et al Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med., 343: 905-914, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Miller K. D., Rugo H. S., Cobleigh M. A., Marcom P. K., Chap L. I., Holmes F. A., et al Phase III trial of capecitabine (Xeloda®) plus bevacizumab (AvastinTM) versus capecitabine alone in women with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 76 (Suppl. 1): S37 2002.
  14. Yang J. C., Haworth L., Sherry R. M., Hwu P., Schwartzentruber D. J., Topalian S. L., et al A randomized trial of bevacizumab, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, for metastatic renal cell cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 349: 427-434, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kabbinavar F. F., Johnson D., Langmuir V. K., Holmgren E., Bergsland E. Patterns of tumor progression during therapy with bevacizumab and chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer and advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 20: 277a 2001.
  16. Giantonio B. J., Levy D., O’Dwyer P. J., Meropol N. J., Catalano P. J., Benson A. B. Bevacizumab plus IFL as front-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2200. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 22: 255 2003.
  17. Benson A. B., Catalano P. J., Meropol N. J., O’Dwyer P. J., Giantonio B. J. Bevacizumab plus FOLFOX4 in previously treated advanced colorectal cancer: an interim toxicity analysis of the Easter Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 22: 243 2003.
  18. DeVore R. F., Fehrenbacher L., Herbst R. S., Langer C. J., Kelly K., Gaudreault J., Holmgren E., Novotny W. F., Kabbinavar F. A randomized Phase II trial comparing rhuMAb VEGF (recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor) plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) to CP alone in patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Onocol., 19: 485a 2000.
  19. Gray R., Giantonio B. J., O’Dwyer P. J., Sandler A., Miller K., Comis R. L. The safety of adding angiogenesis inhibition into treatment for colorectal, breast and lung cancer: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group’s experience with bevacizumab. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 22: 206 2003.
  20. Internet database. http://www.fda.gov/cder/news/thalidomide.htm.
  21. D’Amato R. J., Loughnan M. S., Flynn E., Folkman J. Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 4082-4085, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kenyon B. M., Browne F., D’Amato R. J. Effects of thalidomide and related metabolites in a mouse corneal model of neovascularization. Exp. Eye Res., 64: 971-978, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Singhal S., Mehta J., Desikan R., Ayers D., Roberson P., Eddlemon P., et al Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med., 341: 1565-1571, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Barlogie B., Desikan R., Eddlemon P., Spencer T., Zeldis J., Munshi N., et al Extended survival in advanced and refractory multiple myeloma after single-agent thalidomide: identification of prognostic factors in a phase 22 study of 169 patents. Blood, 98: 492-494, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Rajkumar V., Hayman S., Gertz M., Dispenzieri A., Lacy M. Q., Greipp P. R., et al Combination therapy with thalidomide plus dexamethasone for newly diagnosed myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol., 20: 4319-4323, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Matthews S. J., McCoy C. Thalidomide: a review of approved and investigation uses. Clin. Ther., 25: 342-395, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Moreira A. L., Sampaio E. P., Zmuidzinas A., Frinat P., Smith K. A., Kaplan G. Thalidomide exerts its inhibitory action on tumor necrosis factor {alpha} by enhancing mRNA degradation. J. Exp. Med., 177: 1675-1680, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Keifer J. A., Guttridge D. C., Ashburner B. P., Baldwin A. S. Inhibition of NF-{kappa}B activity by thalidomide through suppression of I{kappa}B kinase activity. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 22382-22387, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Lindner D. J. Interferons as antiangiogenic agents. Curr. Oncol. Rep., 4: 510-514, 2002.[Medline]
  30. Ezekowitz R. A., Mulliken J. B., Folkman J. Interferon {alpha}-2a therapy for life-threatening hemangiomas of infancy (Errata in N. Engl. J. Med., 330: 300, 1994 and N. Engl. J. Med., 333: 595–596, 1995). N. Engl. J. Med., 326: 1456-1463, 1993.
  31. Kirkwood J., Ibrahim J. G., Sondak V., Richards J., Flaherty L. E., Ernstoff M. S., et al High- and low-dose interferon {alpha}-2b in high-risk melanoma: first analysis of intergroup trial E1690/S9111/C9190. J. Clin. Oncol., 18: 2444-2458, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Motzer R. J., Bacik J., Murphy B. A., Russo P., Mazumdar M. Interferon-{alpha} as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol., 20: 289-296, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Krown S. E. Management of Kaposi’s sarcoma: the role of interferon and thalidomide. Curr. Opin. Oncol., 13: 374-381, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Bauer J. A., Morrison B. H., Grane R. W., Jacobs B. S., Borden E. C., Lindner D. J. IFN-{alpha}2b and thalidomide synergistically inhibit tumor-induced angiogenesis. J. Interferon Cytokine Res., 23: 3-10, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Lingen M. W., Polverin P. J., Bouck N. P. Retinoic acid and interferon {alpha} act synergistically as antiangiogenic and antitumor agents against human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res., 58: 5551-5558, 1997.
  36. Hidalgo M., Eckhardt S. G. Development of matrix metalloproteinases inhibitors in cancer therapy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 93: 178-193, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Yamamoto H., Adachi Y., Itoh F., Iku S., Matsuno K., Kusano M., et al Association of matrilysin expression with recurrence and poor prognosis in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res., 59: 3313-3316, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Murray G. I., Duncan M. E., O’Neil P., Melvin W. E. T., Fothergill J. E. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Nat. Med., 4: 461-462, 1996.
  39. Yamamoto H., Itoh F., Iku S., Adachi Y., Fukashima H., Sasaki S., et al Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in human pancreatic adenocarcinomas: clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of matrilysin expression. J. Clin. Oncol., 19: 1118-1127, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Nelson A. R., Fingleton B., Rothenberg M. L., Matrisian L. M. Matrix metalloproteinases: biologic activity and clinical implications. J. Clin. Oncol., 18: 1135-1149, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Sparano J. A., Bernardo P., Gradishar W. J., Ingle J. N., Zucker S., Davidson N. E. Randomized Phase III trial of marimastat versus placebo in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have responding or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial (E2196). Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 21: 44a 2002.
  42. Shepherd F. A., Giaccone G., Seymour L., Debruyne C., Bezjak A., Hirsh V., et al Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of marimastat after response to first-line chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer: a trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 20: 4434-4439, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Smylie M., Mercier R., Aboulafia D., Tucker R., Bonomi P., Collier M., et al Phase III study of the matrix metalloprotease (MMP) inhibitor prinomastat in patients having advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 20: 307a 2001.
  44. Bissett D., O’Byrne K., von Pawel J., Mercier R., Price A., Nicolson M., et al Phase III study of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor prinomastat in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 21: 296a 2002.
  45. Bramhall S. R., Hallissey M. T., Whiting J., Scholefield J., Tierney G., Stuart R. C., et al Marimastat as maintenance therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised trial. Br. J. Cancer, 86: 1864-1870, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Bramhall S., Rosemurgy A., Brown P. D., Bowry C., Buckels J. A. C. Marimastat as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial. J. Clin. Oncol., 19: 3447-3455, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Bramhall S. R., Schulz J., Nemunaitis J., Brown P. D., Baillet M., Buckels J. A. A double-blind placebo-controlled, randomized study comparing gemcitabine and marimastat with gemcitabine and placebo as first line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 87: 161-167, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Moore M., Hamm J., Eisenberg P., Dagenais M., Hagan K., Fields A., et al A comparison between gemcitabine (GEM) and the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor BAY12-9566 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 19: 240a 2000.
  49. Phuphanich S., Levin V., Yung W., Forsyth P., Maestro R., Perry J. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (PB) trial of marimastat (MT) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme or gliosarcoma following completion of conventional first-line treatment. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 20: 52a 2001.
  50. Bergers G., Brekken R., McMahon G., Vu T. H., Itoh T., Tamaki K., et al Matrix metalloproteinase-9 triggers the angiogenic switch during carcinogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol., 2: 737-744, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Brown P. D. Clinical studies with matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. APMIS, 107: 174-180, 1999.[Medline]
  52. Belinsky S. A., Nikula K. J., Palmisano W. A., Michels R., Saccomanno G., Gabrielson E., Baylin S. B., Herman J. G. Aberrant methylation of p16INK4a is an early event in lung cancer and a potential biomarker for early diagnosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 11891-11896, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Mao L., Hruban R. H., Boyle J. O., Tockman M., Sidransky D. Detection of oncogene mutations in sputum precedes diagnosis of cancer. Cancer Res., 54: 1634-1637, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BloodHome page
H. Chen, M. S. Gordon, R. A. Campbell, M. Li, C. S. Wang, H. J. Lee, E. Sanchez, S. J. Manyak, D. Gui, D. Shalitin, et al.
Pleiotrophin is highly expressed by myeloma cells and promotes myeloma tumor growth
Blood, July 1, 2007; 110(1): 287 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GutHome page
J Heidemann, D G Binion, W Domschke, and T Kucharzik
Antiangiogenic therapy in human gastrointestinal malignancies.
Gut, October 1, 2006; 55(10): 1497 - 1511.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
S. Kohli and M. Kohli
Acute Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiovascular Changes in Patients With Testicular Cancer: Are There Implications for Blood Pressure Management in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy?
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2006; 24(15): 2399 - 2399.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. Li, L. Tian, J.-m. Hou, Z.-y. Ding, Q.-m. He, P. Feng, Y.-j. Wen, F. Xiao, B. Yao, R. Zhang, et al.
Improved Therapeutic Effectiveness by Combining Recombinant CXC Chemokine Ligand 10 with Cisplatin in Solid Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 11(11): 4217 - 4224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
S. Motl
Bevacizumab in combination chemotherapy for colorectal and other cancers
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 15, 2005; 62(10): 1021 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin Med ResHome page
D. M. Elston
Mechanisms of Regression
Clin. Med. Res., May 1, 2004; 2(2): 85 - 88.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sparano, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Comis, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sparano, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Comis, R. L.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online