
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
2 on Platelets as a Biological Marker
Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Eisai Co., Ltd., Ibaraki, Japan
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 expression. Here we describe the antiangiogenic and antitumor effects of E7820 in mice and discuss the feasibility of using platelet integrin
2 expression on platelets as a biological marker of the efficacy of E7820. Oral administration of E7820 significantly inhibited basic fibroblast growth factor-induced angiogenesis in Matrigel implants and human colon WiDr tumor-induced angiogenesis in a dorsal air sac model. Twice-daily treatment with E7820 clearly inhibited the s.c. tumor growth of seven tumor cell lines derived from human colon, breast, pancreas, and kidney, and completely suppressed the growth of human pancreatic KP-1 and human colon LoVo cell lines. Moreover, E7820 significantly inhibited the growth of KP-1 and human colon tumor Colo320DM cells orthotopically implanted in the pancreas and cecum, respectively. The efficacy of E7820 was comparable in the s.c. and orthotopic transplantation models. Immunohistochemical analyses using anti-CD31 antibody showed that E7820 significantly reduced microvessel density in orthotopically implanted KP-1 tumor. E7820 reduced integrin
2 expression on a megakaryocytic cell line, Dami cells, induced by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate treatment. It also decreased the expression level of integrin
2 on platelets withdrawn from mice bearing s.c. KP-1 tumor at a dosage close to that affording antitumor activity. These data demonstrate that E7820 showed a broad-spectrum antitumor effect in mice through inhibition of angiogenesis and indicate that the decrease of integrin
2 on platelets might serve as a biological marker for the antitumor efficacy of E7820. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies in preclinical models suggested that most angiogenesis inhibitors might cause transition of a growing tumor to a dormant state, rather than tumor regression, although some angiogenesis inhibitors have induced dramatic regression of a few well-established tumors (12 , 18) . Clinical studies also indicate that angiogenesis inhibitors might stabilize tumor growth (14 , 15) . Thus, long-term dosing may be necessary to obtain clinical benefits such as disease-free survival and increased life span. Angiogenesis inhibitors appear to have a wide therapeutic ratio, and administration at the maximum-tolerated dose may not be needed (14 , 16) . Thus, several exploratory clinical investigations to find appropriate dosages have been conducted by using magnetic resonance imaging analysis (19) , measurement of endothelial cell apoptosis (20) , and DNA microarray analysis (21 , 22) . Therefore, we thought it would be valuable to identify a surrogate marker in preclinical model study, which would be useful in predicting adequate dosage levels of angiogenesis inhibitors for clinical use.
We reported previously that E7820, an aromatic sulfonamide derivative, is a novel angiogenesis inhibitor that inhibits both proliferation and tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) induced by either basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) or VEGF (23)
. E7820 decreased integrin
2, 3, 5, and ß1 in confluent cultures of HUVEC. In particular, E7820 reduced only integrin
2 mRNA as an early event. Furthermore, the suppression of integrin
2 on HUVEC by E7820 treatment contributed to the inhibition of tube formation in a type I collagen matrix culture model.
In the present study, we first examined the in vivo pharmacological efficacy of E7820 against both angiogenesis and tumor growth. In vivo antiangiogenic effects of E7820 were examined by using angiogenic factor-induced and tumor-induced angiogenesis models. We examined the antitumor effect of E7820 on growth of orthotopically implanted tumors in addition to s.c. inoculated tumors to determine the effect of E7820 on organ-specific endothelial cells. Secondly, we examined the alteration of integrin
2 expression on a megakaryocytic cell line in vitro and on platelets in a xenograft model. E7820 showed antitumor activity in various human tumor xenograft models and suppressed integrin
2 expression on platelets at a dosage similar to that inhibiting tumor growth in the xenograft models.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Monoclonal Antibody.
Mouse monoclonal antihuman integrin
2 Ab (A2-IIE10) was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 fragment of rabbit antimouse IgG was purchased from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark). FITC-conjugated hamster monoclonal antimouse
2 Ab, rat monoclonal antimouse CD31 Ab (MEC13.3), FITC-conjugated rat monoclonal antimouse CD31 Ab, FITC-conjugated hamster IgG and FITC-conjugated rat IgG were purchased from PharMingen (San Diago, CA).
Preparation of E7820.
For in vitro assay, E7820 was first dissolved in DMSO and diluted further in medium. For in vivo studies, E7820 was suspended in 5% methylcellulose. In dorsal air sac (DAS) model, E7820 was dissolved in 35% DMSO and 65% Tween 80 at 100 mg/ml. The solution was diluted to final concentration with 5% glucose.
Sandwich Tube Formation Assay.
The tube formation assay was performed as described previously (23)
. Briefly, HUVEC were plated on the collagen gel at a concentration of 1 to 1.2 x 105 cells/well (24-well plate) in serum-free medium (human endothelial-serum-free basal growth medium; Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) with EGF (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) at 10 ng/ml and either bFGF (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) or VEGF (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) at 20 ng/ml. Then, HUVEC were covered with a second collagen gel and cultured with or without E7820 in serum-free medium supplemented with angiogenic factors. Tube length of capillaries was quantified by calculating the pixel density of outline images based on images obtained with a microscope. All experiments were done at least in duplicate and were repeated three times.
Cell Growth Assay.
Cell growth assay for endothelial cells was performed as described previously (23)
. Tumor cells were plated at 1 to 2 x 103 cells/well on 96-well plates in 0.1 ml of RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum. After 24 h, either E7820 or vehicle was added to duplicate cultures of cells, and at 2 or 3 days after addition of E7820, the ratios of surviving cells were measured by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. All experiments were done at least in duplicate and repeated twice.
In Vivo Growth Factor-Induced Angiogenesis.
The method described by Passaniti et al. (25)
was used, with some modification. Briefly, bFGF (300 ng/pellet) was embedded in a pellet of Matrigel (300 µl; Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA) and injected s.c. in C57BL/6N mice (Charles River Japan, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan). Vehicle or E7820 was given orally, by gavage, for 7 days (twice daily) after Matrigel implantation. At autopsy, the pellet was removed, and the hemoglobin content was measured by Drabkins procedure (Drabkin reagent kit; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), according to the manufacturers instructions.
Mouse DAS Model.
The mouse DAS method was performed as described previously (26)
. Briefly, a suspension of 1.5 x 107 WiDr cells in collagen gel was injected into a chamber. This chamber was implanted into a DAS produced by injecting 10 ml of air into a C57BL/6N mouse. Administration of E7820 was started at 6 h after the transplantation (day 1). Vehicle or E7820 was given orally, by gavage, for 4 days (once daily). On day 5, 51Cr-labeled (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Tokyo, Japan) blood cells were injected into the tail vein of mice. Vascular volume was calculated from the radioactivity of the skin attached to the chamber.
Xenograft Model.
Six-week-old female nude mice (KSN mice; SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) underwent s.c. transplantation of human tumors (510 x 106 cells/mouse, except for RCC-1; 2- to 3-mm tumor fragments). Administration was started when the tumor volume reached 60100 mm3 (except for AsPC-1; one day after transplantation). E7820 was administered orally on a schedule of twice daily every day for 36 weeks. Tumor volumes were checked twice a week during the experiment by direct measurement of the diameter of tumors with calipers. Tumor volume was calculated using the formula (a x b x b)/2, where a is the largest diameter and b is the diameter perpendicular to a. Values of
T/C (% of control for
growth) were calculated from the formula, (
T/
C) x 100, where
T and
C are changes in tumor volume (
growth) for each treated and vehicle control group. In the case of reduction of tumor volume,
T/C values were calculated according to the following formula,
T/C (%) = (TVn-TV1)/TV1 x 100, where TVn is the tumor volume of treated mice on day n.
Orthotopic Transplantation Model.
Seven-week-old female KSN mice were anesthetized and an incision was made at the abdomen. The tail of the pancreas or cecum was gently exposed. Seven million human pancreatic cancer cells (KP-1) were injected into the parenchyma of the pancreatic gland. A 20-mg block of human colon cancer tumor tissue (Colo320DM) was implanted on the cecum. The administration of E7820 was started 7 or 8 days (day 1) after transplantation. In the pancreatic orthotopic transplantation model, E7820 was orally administered twice daily for 21 days. On day 22, the locally grown tumors were resected, weighed, and then used for immunohistochemistry. In colon orthotopic transplantation model, E7820 was administered twice daily for 2 weeks. On day 15, the locally grown tumors were weighed and photographed.
Histological Analysis of Tumor Blood Vessels.
The resected tumors were mounted in OCT compound (Miles Scientific, Naperville, IL), frozen, and stored at -80°C until required. Frozen tumor sections were cut and stained by indirect immunoperoxidase with rat antimouse CD31 monoclonal Ab, which detects vascular endothelial cells in the tumor. Immune staining with anti-CD31 Ab was performed according to the method described previously (26)
. Tumor vessels were counted by microscopy in x33 fields (25 fields/tumor) and were calculated as vessel density (/mm2).
Analysis by Flow Cytometry.
Dami cells, a megakaryocytic cell line, were stimulated with 2 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and cultured either with or without E7820 at the indicated doses for 72 h. The cells were harvested and suspended at 2 x 105 cells in 100 µl of PBS containing 0.1% BSA, then incubated with 1 µg of primary antibodies (antihuman integrin
2 Ab) for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were washed with PBS and incubated in FITC-conjugated secondary Ab diluted 1:40 in PBS for 30 min at 4°C. The control sample (for background) was incubated with control IgG in PBS containing 0.1% BSA. Fluorescence signals from 1 x 104 cells were acquired using a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (Calibur; Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) to quantify staining intensity. The expression of each molecule was calculated using the mean fluorescence of each sample as determined by flow cytometry: Relative expression (relative mean fluorescence intensity; RMFI) = mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of sample/MFI of background.
Evaluation of the Expression Level of Integrin
2 on Platelets in KP-1 Xenograft Model.
Six-week-old female nude mice (KSN mice) underwent s.c. transplantation of KP-1 human pancreatic tumor. Administration was started (day 1) at 7 days after transplantation. E7820 was administered orally twice daily for 3 weeks. The expression level of integrin
2 on platelets of mice treated with either vehicle or E7820 was measured once a week. Blood was withdrawn from the eye of anesthetized mice in PBS containing 0.004% sodium citrate and diluted at 1:100. Diluted blood samples were directly stained with FITC-conjugated anti-integrin
2 Ab or anti-CD31 Ab, and expression levels on platelets were analyzed by flow cytometry. Forward scatter and side scatter were used for gating of platelets. For evaluation of numbers of platelets, blood was collected from the aorta and counted with a Total Hematology Management System (Technicon H*1; Bayer Co.).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
2 on Platelet.
2 on Dami cells was up-regulated by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate treatment for 3 days. This up-regulation of integrin
2 was inhibited in the presence of E7820 in a dose-dependent manner. Relative mean fluorescence intensity of integrin
2 on Dami cells without E7820 treatment was 30.8 ± 4.8, whereas the corresponding values for cells treated with E7820 at 5, 50, and 500 ng/ml were 19.6 ± 10.2, 13.0 ± 2.5, and 6.7 ± 2.3, respectively (Fig. 4)
2 on platelets is altered by E7820 treatment in vivo, we measured sequentially the expression level of integrin
2 on platelets from mice treated with E7820 in the KP-1 xenograft model, accompanied with measurement of the tumor volumes. E7820 was administered twice daily for 3 weeks orally from 7 days after transplantation. E7820 induced a dose-dependent reduction of integrin
2 expression on platelets (Fig. 5B)
2 expression on platelets in E7820-treated mice was restored after withdrawal of E7820 treatment for 7 days, whereas the antitumor activity remained at 100 and 200 mg/kg (Fig. 5, A and B)
2 integrin expression on platelets was detected at doses close to those showing antitumor activity. The number of platelets was not changed by administration of E7820 for 3 weeks (data not shown).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. In the present report, the in vivo pharmacological profile of E7820 was examined. Furthermore, we suggested that alteration of integrin
2 expression on platelets might serve as a biological marker for efficacy of E7820.
E7820 inhibited both bFGF-induced angiogenesis in a Matrigel plug model and tumor (human colorectal WiDr tumor cell)-induced vascularization in the DAS model after oral administration. In addition, we reported previously that angiogenesis induced by WiDr cells was dependent on VEGF in the DAS model (26)
, suggesting that E7820 is effective against both bFGF- and VEGF-dependent angiogenesis in vivo as well as in vitro. E7820 showed broad-spectrum tumor inhibition at doses from 50 to 200 mg/kg in s.c. xenograft models involving human colon, breast, pancreas, and kidney tumor. It might be important to inhibit multiple factors for effective inhibition of tumor angiogenesis, because it was reported that multiple angiogenic factors are secreted from tumor cells, and expression of angiogenic factors was increased in late-stage tumors (27)
. The in vitro growth of tumor cells we examined was extremely insensitive to E7820 compared with that of HUVEC, as shown in Table 1
, except for RCC-1 (in vivo passaging tumor line). The microvessel density in tumor tissue was also reduced after E7820 treatment. These results suggested E7820 inhibits tumor growth through angiogenesis inhibition in mice. E7820 was well tolerated in all of the in vivo experiments. Its profile was consistent with that of an angiogenesis inhibitor.
Blood vessels in different organs are known to be functionally and structurally different from each other. Furthermore, it was reported that angiogenic heterogeneity was regulated by the organ microenvironment of the tumor. Histopathological analysis in a human renal carcinoma xenograft model showed that tumors growing in the subcutis of mice had few blood vessels compared with those in the kidney, which had many vessels (28)
. In a human colon carcinoma xenograft model, angiogenic factors such as bFGF and interleukin-8 in tumor tissues were increased in the cecal wall region as compared with s.c. tissue (29)
. These findings prompted us to consider the possibility that the activity of angiogenesis inhibitors might vary in different organ-specific endothelial cells. The effect of E7820 on organ-specific endothelial cells was examined in orthotopically inoculated KP-1 pancreatic and Colo320DM colon cancer cells. E7820 had a similar antitumor effect against both local growth at orthotopic sites and s.c. growth of KP-1 and Colo320DM tumors (Table 2
; Fig. 3
). These results suggested that E7820 was able to affect endothelial cells of skin, pancreas, and colon. E7820 also showed an antitumor effect against tumor growth at the mammary fat pad (data not shown) and seems to be effective on endothelial cells specific for various organs.
The results of recent clinical studies suggested that angiogenesis inhibitors have modest toxicity and induce stabilization of disease (14
, 15)
. The induction of tumor dormancy is considered to be a clinically useful outcome that might increase disease-free survival and survival time. Compared with standard evaluation in terms of response rate, long-term dosing may be required for evaluation of this type of drug. Therefore, a surrogate marker other than response rate is needed to allow evaluation of the biological effects of angiogenesis inhibitors in early phase studies of short duration and to identify appropriate dosages, which are not close to the maximum-tolerated dose but are sufficient to show antiangiogenic activity. Because the inhibitory effect of E7820 on tube formation of HUVEC within type I collagen gels resulted from a decrement of integrin
2 expression (23)
, we examined whether this unique biological profile could be applied as a marker for the biological effect of E7820. Integrin
2 was reported to be a collagen receptor on platelets and to be involved in platelet aggregation (30)
. Platelets are derived from megakaryocytes, and integrin
2 is up-regulated in the process of megakaryocyte differentiation toward platelets (31)
. In an in vitro model of megakaryocyte differentiation using human megakaryocytic Dami cells (32)
, E7820 suppressed phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced expression of integrin
2 at a similar concentration to that at which it was effective on HUVEC (Fig. 4)
. Furthermore, oral administration of E7820 decreased integrin
2 expression on platelets during treatment in the KP-1 s.c. xenograft model. The effective dose for decreasing integrin
2 expression on platelets was comparable with that for inhibiting s.c. growth of KP-1 tumor cells. Because the number of platelets was not changed in mice treated with E7820, E7820 might suppress integrin
2 expression in megakaryocytes without affecting platelet differentiation. It was unclear whether the mechanism by which expression of integrin
2 subunits is regulated in endothelial cells is the same as that in megakaryocytes. However, the comparable effects of E7820 on integrin
2 expression on platelets and growth of KP-1 tumor cells suggested that the decrement of integrin
2 expression on platelets might be useful as a marker for biological effect of E7820. Expression levels of integrin
2 on platelets of individual humans differ. However, in each healthy volunteer examined, the level of integrin
2 expression on platelets was constant over 2 weeks [RFMI ratio to day 1: 0.94 ± 0.01 (Day 8), 1.01 ± 0.02 (day 15), n = 3]. Therefore, integrin
2 on platelets could be used as a biological marker by monitoring its expression level before and after E7820 treatment in clinical studies.
E7820 was highly effective against s.c. growth of LoVo and KP-1 cells among the in vivo tumor panel. Moreover, E7820 regressed the tumor mass of KP-1 tumor cells in the s.c. xenograft model. Some angiogenesis inhibitors, such as VEGF receptor kinase inhibitor, an integrin antagonist (12
, 18)
, have been shown to promote tumor regression by inducing apoptosis of tumor vasculature. It is possible that E7820 might induce apoptosis of endothelial cells in KP-1 tumor. Because it was reported that the survival of endothelial cells was dependent on a survival signal via integrin (12)
, the difference of integrin expression on vascular endothelial cells of tumor tissues might be involved. Integrin
vß3 was reported to have a critical role in tumor angiogenesis. Expression of both
1ß1 and
2ß1 was reported to be induced by VEGF, and an inhibitory Ab against
1ß1 and
2ß1 inhibited not only angiogenesis by VEGF-overexpressing tumor cells but also tumor growth in mice (33
, 34)
. Therefore, it is of interest to examine integrin expression on intratumoral endothelial cells in KP-1 tumor.
E7820 is a novel angiogenesis inhibitor that has a unique biological activity suppressing an expression of integrin
2 subunit. Although many angiogenesis inhibitors are now being clinically evaluated, combination therapy with angiogenesis inhibitors that act on different processes of angiogenesis might be a worthwhile approach to potentiate the antitumor effect. In summary, we have shown in this study that E7820 has promising antitumor effects in a preclinical model through inhibition of angiogenesis and that monitoring the expression level of integrin
2 on platelets might be a valuable predictive marker for the biological effect of E7820. A clinical evaluation of E7820 seems warranted.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Requests for reprints: Taro Semba, Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Eisai Co., Ltd., 5-1-3 Tokodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. Phone: 81-29-847-5749; Fax: 81-29-847-2037; E-mail: t-semba{at}hhc.eisai.co.jp
Received 8/28/03; revised 11/10/03; accepted 11/12/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
vß3 antagonists promote tumor regression by inducing apoptosis of angiogenic blood vessels. Cell, 79: 1157-1164, 1994.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 subunit on endothelium. Cancer Res., 62: 6116-6123, 2002.
2 integrin gene expression in cells with megakaryocytic features: a common theme of three necessary elements. Blood, 86: 3006-3014, 1995.
1ß1 and
2ß1 integrins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 13612-13617, 1997.
1ß1 and
2ß1 integrins provide critical support for vascular endothelial growth factor signaling, endothelial cell migration, and tumor angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol., 160: 195-204, 2002.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Silva, G. D'Amico, K. M. Hodivala-Dilke, and L. E. Reynolds Integrins: The Keys to Unlocking Angiogenesis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2008; 28(10): 1703 - 1713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Figueiredo, Y. Kim, M. A.R. St. John, and D. T.W. Wong p12CDK2-AP1 Gene Therapy Strategy Inhibits Tumor Growth in an In vivo Mouse Model of Head and Neck Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 11(10): 3939 - 3948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |