
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
1 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Medicine, 2 Maxine Dunitz Neurosurgical Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UCLA School of Medicine, and 3 Department of Biomathematics, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, and 4 Institute for Nutritional Sciences, Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The recent discovery that CYR61 is highly expressed in breast cancers and associated with more advanced disease has brought to light an emerging family of conserved, modular proteins (10, 11, 12, 13) . This protein family now consists of six distinct members, including CTGF (connective tissue growth factor; Refs. 14 , 15 ), NOV (nephroblastoma overexpressed gene; Refs. 16 , 17 ), CYR61 (cysteine-rich protein; Ref. 18 ), WISP-1 (wnt-1 inducible gene; Ref. 16 ), and WISP-2 (also termed rCop-1) and WISP-3 (19) . CYR61, CTGF, and NOV were the first members of this group, resulting in all of these proteins being called the "CCN family" (20) . The primary translational products of CCN family members are 343381 residues, which generate proteins of Mr 35,00040,000 with homologies ranging from 60 to 90%. All of them possess a secretory signal peptide at the NH2 terminus, indicating that they are secreted proteins.
All of CCN genes contain four distinct structural modules: insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP), Von Willebrand type C (VWC), thrombospondin type 1 (TSP1), and COOH-terminal domain (CT). These distinct modules exhibit homology to conserved regions in a variety of extracellular mosaic proteins (20) . Each module is involved in protein binding and contains conserved cysteine, hydrophobic, and polar residues. The biological properties of CCN proteins include stimulation of cell proliferation, migration, adhesion, and extracellular matrix (ECM) formation. They also regulate more complex biological processes such as angiogenesis and tumorigenesis (21, 22, 23) .
Recent studies have shown that CCN genes are involved in tumorigenesis. Consistent with its profibrotic properties, CTGF is overexpressed in pancreatic cancers (24) and melanomas (25) . WISP-1 is strongly expressed in the fibrovascular stroma of breast tumors developing in Wnt-1 transgenic mice (16) . Moreover, forced overexpression of WISP-1 in normal rat kidney fibroblasts (NRK-49F) was sufficient to induce their transformation (26) . Many of the human tumor cell lines express CYR61, suggesting that CYR61 expression may promote tumorigenesis (27) . Furthermore, CYR61-nonexpressing tumor cell lines tend to be less tumorigenic compared with those that do express the protein (10 , 13) .
In this study, we used real-time reverse transcription-PCR to quantify expression of CNN genes in gliomas. The mRNA levels of four genes (CYR61, CTGF, WISP-1, and NOV) were measured from 66 primary gliomas and five normal human brain tissue samples. Furthermore, we determined whether overexpression of one of the CCN genes was correlated with clinical and pathological parameters of the gliomas as well as survival data, using several models of statistical analysis.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis
Total RNA was extracted from glioma specimens by using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the standard protocol. The quality of the RNA samples was determined by electrophoresis through agarose gels and staining with ethidium bromide, and the 18S and 28S RNA bands were visualized under UV light. Two µg of total RNA were processed directly to cDNA by reverse transcription with Superscript II (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturers protocol in a total volume of 50 µl.
Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR
Theoretical Basis.
Reactions were characterized at the point during cycling when amplification of the PCR product was first detected, rather than the amount of PCR product accumulated after a fixed number of cycles. The parameter Ct was defined as the fractional cycle number at which the fluorescence generated by cleavage of the probe passes a fixed threshold above baseline. The CCN target message in unknown samples was quantified by measuring Ct and by using a standard curve to determine the quantity of starting target message. We also quantified transcripts of ß-actin as the endogenous RNA control, and each sample was normalized on the basis of its ß-actin content. For each experimental sample, the amount of the targets and endogenous reference is determined from the standard curve. The amount of target was divided by the endogenous reference amount to obtain a normalized target value. The relative target gene expression level was also normalized to a mean value (value = 1) from five normal brain tissue samples (calibrator). Final results, expressed as N-fold difference in CCN gene expression relative to the ß-actin and the calibrator, termed
CCN, were determined as follows:
![]() |
Another housekeeping gene, 18S, was used as a second endogenous reference gene to determine the consistency of normalization.
Primers and Probes.
Primers and probes for the CCN and ß-actin genes were designed using software PRIMER35
, as described previously (11)
. We conducted BLAST searches against dbEST and nr (the nonredundant set of GenBank, EMBL, and DDBJ database sequences) to confirm the total gene specificity of the nucleotide sequences chosen for the primers and probes and the absence of DNA polymorphisms. To avoid amplification of contaminating genomic DNA, one of the two primers or the probe was placed at the junction between two exons or in a different exon. Primers were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc., and probes were from Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems.
Standard Curve Construction.
The standard curve was constructed with 10-fold serially diluted total RNA extracted from the MDA-MB-231 cells. Fig. 1
shows the real-time reverse transcription-PCR standard curve for the CTGF gene. A strong linear relationship between the Ct and the log of the starting copy number was always demonstrated. The efficiency of the reaction (E), calculated by the formula: E = 101/m - 1, where m is the slope of the standard curve, ranged from 90 to 100% in the different assays. The standard curves for WISP-1, CYR61, and NOV were also constructed (data not shown).
|
Immunohistochemical Staining
Immunohistochemical staining for CYR-61 was performed with polyclonal antiserum from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Heat-induced epitope retrieval was performed with a pressure cooker and TRIS buffer (pH 9.0) for 2 min. Localization was performed with DAKO ENVISION (Carpinteria, CA) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase followed by the diaminobenzidine reaction. Negative controls consisted of substitution of the primary antiserum with normal rabbit serum at the same dilution. The slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. Immunohistochemical staining for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was performed as above using monoclonal antibody from DAKO.
Statistical Analysis
2 test and t test were used to study the association of each gene with single clinical factors (age, gender, pathology, grade). For each gene, Kaplan-Meier survival curves for patients with positive versus negative gene expression were plotted and log-rank test was used for comparing the equality of the two survival curves. Cox proportional hazard model was also developed to correlate the clinical characteristics, survival, and the expression of the four CCN genes. Stepwise procedure was used for covariate selection. Kappa (
) statistical analysis was used to assess the relationship between all pairs of the four genes.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine whether ß-actin is suitable for the calibrator of normalization, a second housekeeping gene, 18S, was also used as a reference calibrator for CYR61, CTGF, WISP-1, and NOV in five normal brain and six glioma samples. The levels of expression of the CCN genes were comparable with those when ß-actin was used as the reference gene (data not shown).
Expression of CYR61 in Primary Gliomas.
Overexpression of CYR61 was found in 32 (48%) of 66 glioma samples (Fig. 2A)
. Univariate analysis showed a significant association between tumor grade, pathology, and gender, as well as age at onset of disease, compared with the level of expression of CYR61 by the primary brain tumor samples (Table 1)
. Overexpression of CYR61 occurred predominantly in the most malignant samples (GBM). Twenty-seven (68%) of 40 GBM patients overexpressed CYR61; however, overexpression of CYR61 was detected in only 4 (20%) of 19 astrocytomas and 1 (14%) of 7 oligodendrogliomas (P < 0.0001). Interestingly, analysis of tumor grade showed that only 1 (3%) of 29 patients with either grade II or grade III brain tumors had high levels of CYR61; in marked contrast, 31 (66%) of 47 of those with grade IV tumors overexpressed CYR61 (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, gender analysis showed that 70% (14 of 20) of female patients had tumors with high levels of CYR61 mRNA compared with only 39% (18 of 46) male patients whose gliomas overexpressed CYR61 (P = 0.021).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
statistical analysis showed that expression of CYR61 and CTGF are highly correlated (
= 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.680.95; Table 5
= 0.39 and 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.170.61 and 0.220.61, respectively). The association of NOV with the other three genes was significant (
= 0.25) but was much lower than the correlation among CYR61, CTGF, and WISP-1 (Table 5)
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of CYR61 was significantly correlated with gender and tumor grade, as well as patient survival. Overexpression of CYR61 was identified in 32 (48%) of the 66 glioma patients. Earlier studies have shown that CYR61 is overexpressed in breast cancers and may be involved in estrogen-mediated breast tumor development (10) . Significant associations were found between CYR61 expression and stage, tumor size, lymph node involvement, age, and estrogen receptor expression (11) . In this study, a significantly greater percentage of female patients (70%) had high levels of CYR61 in their gliomas compared with the percentage (39%) of males having high levels of CYR61. This divergence could possibly be explained because females have higher serum levels of estrogen and CYR61 is inducible by estrogen.
A previous study showed that overexpression of CYR61 was observed by Northern blot analysis in five (83%) of six glioma cell lines (28) . This small study did not examine primary glioma samples.
Recently, we observed that CYR61 acts as an oncogene through the integrin-linked kinase (ILK) to stimulate ß-catenin-TCF/Lef and Akt signaling pathways.6 Forced expression of CYR61 in U343 glioma cells accelerated their growth in liquid culture, enhanced their anchorage-independent proliferation in soft agar, and significantly increased their ability to form tumors in nude mice. Overexpression of CYR61 resulted in ß-catenin accumulation and nuclear translocation, leading to activation of ß-catenin-TCF/Lef-1 signaling pathway. Furthermore, the data demonstrated that CYR61 can activate Akt by phosphorylation through a PI3 kinase-dependent manner, suggesting that CYR61 may stimulate several signaling pathways in the development of gliomas.
CTGF is transcriptionally activated with rapid kinetics in fibroblasts by serum growth factors (29) and TGF-ß (30 , 31) . Moreover, CTGF has been implicated in cellular proliferation, migration, and tube formation of vascular endothelial cells in vitro and in angiogenesis in vivo (32 , 33) . Consistent with these properties, CTGF is often overexpressed in melanomas, sarcomas, chondrosarcomas, and pancreatic cancer cells (24 , 25 , 34 , 35) . Moreover, overexpression of CTGF was also noted in five of six glioma cell lines and some cells derived from primary gliomas by Northern analysis (28) . Recently, overexpression of CTGF has also been found in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and pediatric myofibroblastic tumors (36 , 37) .
In the present study, high levels of CTGF mRNA were noted in 38 (58%) of 66 glioma samples. Univariate analysis showed that gender, tumor stage, and pathology were significantly associated with overexpression of CTGF in the primary tumors. Thirty-one (78%) of the 40 GBM, the most malignant brain tumor, had high levels of CTGF compared with 6 (30%) of 19 astrocytomas and 1 (14%) of 7 oligodendregliomas, suggesting that overexpression of CTGF is correlated with tumor progression in gliomas. Consistent with our observation, a recent gene microarray study suggested that CTGF was one of the genes involved in the progression of gliomas (9) . CTGF has four identical structural domains and is closely related to CYR61. Both of them trigger downstream events via a signaling pathway through distinct integrins (27 , 38) .
WISP-1 was identified as a gene up-regulated in Wnt-1-transformed C57MG mouse mammary epithelial cells (16) . WISP-1 encodes a protein with a secretory signal peptide and has complete conservation of all 38 cysteine residues with those of CYR61 and CTGF. Overexpression of WISP-1 induced morphological transformation, increased cellular saturation density, promoted growth in normal rat kidney fibroblasts, and induced their tumor formation in nude mice (26) . WISP-1 was found to be highly expressed in breast cancer, and its expression was correlated with tumor stage, and lymph node status (11) . We found that it was highly expressed in 24 (36%) of 66 primary gliomas. WISP-1, used as continuous variable predictor, showed a significant association with survival of the patients. However, statistical analysis showed no significant association between other clinical and pathological parameters versus the level of WISP-1 in the gliomas. The role of WISP-1 in gliomas remains to be elucidated.
NOV was initially identified as an aberrantly expressed gene in chicken nephroblastomas induced by myeloblastosis-associated virus (39) . In our study, overexpression of NOV occurred in only 10 (15%) of 66 gliomas; and no significant correlation was found between expression of this gene and the clinical and pathological features. These findings suggest that NOV is not involved in either the development or progression of gliomas. Furthermore, a recent study showed that forced expression of Nov in the C6 glioma cell line inhibited cell growth and tumorigenic potential both in vitro and in vivo (40) .
In summary, our data indicate that overexpression of CTGF, WISP-1, and CYR61 may be involved in the process of development of gliomas and points to an association between expression of these proteins and several clinical and pathological features of these tumors. This comprehensive study of CCN gene expression in gliomas is an important first step in exploring the mechanism and function of these genes in the development of this malignancy. Clinically, our studies showed that prominent expression of the genes coding for CYR61 and CTGF is associated with gliomas being at an advanced stage at diagnosis. Statistical analysis showed that the level of expression of CYR61 and CTGF in the glioma at the time of diagnosis provided compelling prognostic information. Understanding the aberrant signaling pathways that are activated by high levels of expression of these CCN proteins, may offer useful therapeutic targets.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Dong Xie, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California-Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90048. Phone: (310) 423-7740; Fax: (310) 423-0225; E-mail: xied{at}ucla.edu
5 http://www.genome.wi.nit.edu/cgi-bin/primer/primer3_www.cgi. ![]()
6 D. Xie, D. Yin, X. Tong, H. P. Koeffler. Cyr6l is overexpressed in gliomas and involved in integrin-linked kinase-mediated Akt and ß-catenin-TCF/LEF signaling pathways, manuscript submitted. ![]()
Received 4/21/03; revised 11/19/03; accepted 12/12/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
vß3, promotes endothelial cell survival, and induces angiogenesis in vivo. Mol Cell Biol, 19: 2958-66, 1999.
vß3. J Biol Chem, 273: 3090-6, 1998.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Alvarez, A. Corvalan, J. C. Roa, P. Argani, F. Murillo, J. Edwards, R. Beaty, G. Feldmann, S.-M. Hong, M. Mullendore, et al. Serial Analysis of Gene Expression Identifies Connective Tissue Growth Factor Expression as a Prognostic Biomarker in Gallbladder Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 14(9): 2631 - 2638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Z. Deng, P.-P. Chen, Y. Wang, D. Yin, H. P. Koeffler, B. Li, X.-J. Tong, and D. Xie Connective Tissue Growth Factor Is Overexpressed in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Promotes Tumorigenicity through -Catenin-T-cell Factor/Lef Signaling J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2007; 282(50): 36571 - 36581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Sala-Torra, H. M. Gundacker, D. L. Stirewalt, P. A. Ladne, E. L. Pogosova-Agadjanyan, M. L. Slovak, C. L. Willman, S. Heimfeld, D. H. Boldt, and J. P. Radich Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) expression and outcome in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia Blood, April 1, 2007; 109(7): 3080 - 3083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Auger, J. Thillet, K. Wanherdrick, A. Idbaih, M.-E. Legrier, B. Dutrillaux, M. Sanson, and M.-F. Poupon Genetic alterations associated with acquired temozolomide resistance in SNB-19, a human glioma cell line. Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2006; 5(9): 2182 - 2192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Chien, D. Yin, D. Gui, A. Mori, J. M. Frank, J. Said, D. Kusuanco, A. Marchevsky, R. McKenna, and H. P. Koeffler Suppression of Cell Proliferation and Signaling Transduction by Connective Tissue Growth Factor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Mol. Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 4(8): 591 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-C. Chang, M.-T. Lin, B.-R. Lin, Y.-M. Jeng, S.-T. Chen, C.-Y. Chu, R. J. Chen, K.-J. Chang, P.-C. Yang, and M.-L. Kuo Effect of connective tissue growth factor on hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha degradation and tumor angiogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst, July 19, 2006; 98(14): 984 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Dornhofer, S. Spong, K. Bennewith, A. Salim, S. Klaus, N. Kambham, C. Wong, F. Kaper, P. Sutphin, R. Nacalumi, et al. Connective Tissue Growth Factor-Specific Monoclonal Antibody Therapy Inhibits Pancreatic Tumor Growth and Metastasis Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5816 - 5827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Aikawa, J. Gunn, S. M. Spong, S. J. Klaus, and M. Korc Connective tissue growth factor-specific antibody attenuates tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2006; 5(5): 1108 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. R. Pendurthi, T. T. Tran, M. Post, and L. V. M. Rao Proteolysis of CCN1 by Plasmin: Functional Implications Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 65(21): 9705 - 9711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bredel, C. Bredel, D. Juric, G. R. Harsh, H. Vogel, L. D. Recht, and B. I. Sikic Functional Network Analysis Reveals Extended Gliomagenesis Pathway Maps and Three Novel MYC-Interacting Genes in Human Gliomas Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 65(19): 8679 - 8689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Jin, H. P. Kim, E. Ifedigbo, L. F. Lau, and A. M. K. Choi Cyr61 Protects against Hyperoxia-Induced Cell Death via Akt Pathway in Pulmonary Epithelial Cells Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., September 1, 2005; 33(3): 297 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-T. Lin, C.-Y. Zuon, C.-C. Chang, S.-T. Chen, C.-P. Chen, B.-R. Lin, M.-Y. Wang, Y.-M. Jeng, K.-J. Chang, P.-H. Lee, et al. Cyr61 Induces Gastric Cancer Cell Motility/Invasion via Activation of the Integrin/Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B/Cyclooxygenase-2 Signaling Pathway Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 11(16): 5809 - 5820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hagedorn, S. Javerzat, D. Gilges, A. Meyre, B. de Lafarge, A. Eichmann, and A. Bikfalvi Accessing key steps of human tumor progression in vivo by using an avian embryo model PNAS, February 1, 2005; 102(5): 1643 - 1648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Higgins, M. P. Biju, Y. Akai, A. Wutz, R. S. Johnson, and V. H. Haase Hypoxic induction of Ctgf is directly mediated by Hif-1 Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): F1223 - F1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||