
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Report from the FDA |
Authors' Affiliation: Division of Oncology Drug Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland
Requests for reprints: Edvardas Kaminskas, Food and Drug Administration, HFD-150, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. Phone: 301-594-5753; Fax: 301-594-0499; E-mail: edvardas.kaminskas{at}fda.hhs.gov.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design: In one phase 3 controlled trial, 191 study subjects were randomized to treatment with azacitidine or to observation; an additional 120 patients were treated with azacitidine in two phase 2 single arm studies. The primary efficacy end point was the overall response rate, defined as complete or partial normalization of peripheral blood counts and bone marrow blast percentages for at least 4 weeks.
Results: In the controlled trial, the overall response rate was 15.7% in the azacitidine treatment group; there were no responders in the observation group (P < 0.0001). Response rates were similar in the two single arm studies. During response patients stopped being red cell or platelet transfusion dependent. Median duration of responses was at least 9 months. An additional 19% of azacitidine-treated patients had less than partial responses, most becoming transfusion independent. The most common adverse events attributed to azacitidine were gastrointestinal, hematologic, local (injection site), and constitutional. There were no azacitidine-related deaths.
Conclusions: On May 19, 2004 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved azacitidine as injectable suspension for treatment of patients with the following myelodysplastic syndrome subtypes: refractory anemia or refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (if accompanied by neutropenia or thrombocytopenia or requiring transfusions), refractory anemia with excess blasts, refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Full prescribing information is available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/2004/050794lbl.pdf. Azacitidine is the first agent approved for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome.
Key Words: Azacitidine Vidaza Myelodysplastic syndrome Refractory anemia Acute myeloid leukemia
Disease progression in MDS patients is characterized by cytopenias, infections, bleeding, dependency on packed RBC and platelet transfusions, and development of AML. Prior to approval of azacitidine, the mainstay of therapy was supportive care. Therapy with high-dose cytotoxic agents has generally yielded disappointing results, and bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is not appropriate for the majority of MDS patients who are over 60 years of age (5).
A different form of therapy for MDS involves the use of agents that promote cell differentiation, such as azacitidine, an analogue of cytidine. Azacitidine is phosphorylated by a series of kinases to azacitidine triphosphate, which is incorporated into RNA, disrupting RNA metabolism and protein synthesis. Azacytidine diphosphate is reduced by ribonucleotide reductase to 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine diphosphate, which is phosphorylated to triphosphate and incorporated into DNA. There it binds stoichiometrically DNA methyltransferases and causes hypomethylation of replicating DNA (6, 7).
DNA hypermethylation at the CpG islands is thought to accompany neoplastic transformation and silencing of a number of tumor suppressor genes. Azacitidine may act as an inducer of cell differentiation by causing demethylation and reexpression of genes silenced by hypermethylation (8). The discovery of hypermethylation of the p15INK4B gene in MDS (9, 10) suggested that azacytidine may be effective in the treatment of MDS.
Azacitidine is also a cytotoxic agent in proliferating cells, but the concentration of azacitidine required for maximum inhibition of DNA methylation in vitro does not suppress synthesis of replicating DNA (11).
| Regulatory history |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three multicenter Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trials (1517) and seven single center trials (1824) carried out between 1985 and 2002 documented azacitidine activity in MDS patients. Pharmion Corporation submitted a New Drug Application based on the data of the three CALGB trials.
| Chemistry |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Toxicology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Clinical pharmacology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metabolism of azacitidine involves deamination by cytidine deaminase followed by opening of the ring structure (30). Azacitidine and its metabolites are primarily excreted by the kidneys.
The effects of intrinsic factors such as age, gender, race, renal impairment, or hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of azacitidine have not been studied. In vivo drug-drug interaction studies have not been conducted. In vitro studies in cultured human hepatocytes indicate that azacitidine at a clinically relevant concentrations is not an inducer of CYP 1A2, 2C19, or 3A4/5.1
| Clinical trials |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3 months for symptomatic anemia, had platelet counts of
50 x 109/L or significant hemorrhage, required platelet transfusions, or were neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count < 1 x 109/L) with infections requiring treatment with antibiotics. Patients randomized to the observation group were allowed to cross over to azacitidine treatment after two to four cycles of therapy if they met prespecified criteria of disease progression. Blocked randomization included stratification by the five MDS subtypes. Patients with hepatic or renal impairment were excluded from the trials. The two supporting studies were open-label, multicenter single arm studies, one treating patients with azacitidine administered s.c. (CALGB 8921), the other i.v. (CALGB 8421).
Treatment. The starting azacitidine dose, administered s.c. or i.v., was 75 mg/m2 for 7 days every 28 days. The dose was to be decreased for hematologic toxicity and renal function abnormalities, and increased for lack of efficacy in absence of toxicity. Patients with no response after four azacitidine treatment cycles were to be taken off the study.
Efficacy end points. Overall response rate [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] was the primary efficacy end point. CR was defined as complete normalization of blood cell counts and bone marrow blast percentages for at least 4 weeks. PR was defined as
50% restoration in the deficit from normal levels of baseline blood cell counts, absence of blasts in peripheral blood, and
50% decrease in bone marrow blasts from baseline (in RAEB, RAEB-T, and CMML patients) for at least 4 weeks.
Secondary efficacy end points were time-to-event analyses of death, disease progression, relapse, transformation to AML, and transformation to AML or death. Changes in RBC and platelet transfusions, hemoglobin concentrations, WBC, absolute neutrophil, and platelet counts, rates of infections requiring antibiotic therapy, hemorrhage rates, and percentages of marrow blasts were also assessed.
Results. In the controlled trial a total of 191 subjects were randomized at 53 sites, 99 to the azacitidine treatment arm, and 92 to the observation arm. Subjects in the two arms were well matched by age, gender, race, height, weight, performance status, MDS subtypes, number of patients adjudicated to have AML, and transfusion history. If the baseline diagnosis of AML was made either by the site or by the CALGB central hematopathologist, the diagnosis of AML was assigned to the subject.
Fifty one (55%) of the observation arm subjects crossed over to the azacitidine treatment arm. Thus, 150 of the 191 subjects were treated with azacitidine. About one half received <75 mg/m2/d for 7 days every 28-day cycle for a mean duration of about 17 months, and about one half received
75 mg/m2/d for 7 days every cycle for a mean duration of about 7 months. Nineteen patients received 100 mg/m2/d; no one received a higher dose in this trial.
Study completion information and follow-up status after study completion were available for all 191 subjects. A common reason for withdrawal from both treatment arms was the development of AML, which was more common in the observation arm (44% of patients) than in the azacitidine treatment arm (14% of patients randomized to azacitidine and 12% of patients who crossed over to azacitidine after being randomized to the observation arm). Another common reason for withdrawal from the trial in the azacitidine arm (20% of patients) was no response after four cycles of azacitidine therapy.
The overall response rate (CR + PR) for subjects randomized to azacitidine was 16.2%; there were no responses among subjects randomized to observation (Table 1). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The overall response rate in subjects who crossed over to azacitidine treatment was 11.8%; there were no responses in subjects who remained in the observation arm without crossing over. The overall response rate in all azacitidine-treated subjects was 14.7%.
|
Response rates to azacitidine treatment were similar in the two single-arm studies. CALGB 8921 study enrolled 72 subjects with RAEB (33 subjects), RAEB-T (29 subjects), and CMML (9 subjects) in 30 centers. Subject demographics and performance status were similar to those in the controlled trial. Seventeen subjects were found to have had AML at study entry. The overall response rate in the intent-to-treat population was 13.9%, 12.7% after exclusion of subjects with AML, and 15.4% after exclusion of subjects with AML and of subjects with protocol violations.
CALGB 8421 study enrolled 48 subjects with RAEB (23 subjects), RAEB-T (24 subjects), and AML (1 subject). Subject demographics were similar to those in the controlled trial. The overall response rate in the intent-to-treat population was 18.8%. Exclusion of the one subject with baseline diagnosis of AML did not change the response rate (19.1%). Exclusion of subjects with AML and of subjects with protocol violations resulted in a response rate of 20.0%.
In summary (Table 2), the response rate among all 270 patients treated with azacitidine in the three trials was 15.2%. The response rate among 238 patients with MDS was 15.1%.
|
|
In addition to patients with CR or PR, about 19% of azacitidine-treated patients in the three trials had lesser responses termed "improvement" (defined as
50% restoration in the deficit from normal in one or more peripheral blood cell lines or a
50% decrease in RBC or platelet transfusion requirements). About two thirds of transfusion-dependent patients became transfusion independent with improvement response. The median duration of improvement responses was 195 days. In the observation arm, 6% of patients met the criteria for improvement as a result of increases in platelet or neutrophil counts. All of these patients were anemic, but none of them had an increase in hemoglobin values.
Azacitidine treatment could not be shown to result in a survival benefit or in delay in progression to AML because of the crossover of observation arm patients to azacitidine treatment.
Safety. In the controlled trial, >95% patients in both groups reported treatment-associated adverse events. Azacitidine-treated subjects reported more frequently than observation arm subjects gastrointestinal events (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and anorexia), neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, injection site events, arthralgia, dizziness, dyspnea, cough, and myalgia. Serious adverse events occurred more frequently in azacitidine-treated patients (60%) than in observation patients (36%). Serious adverse events most commonly resulting in hospitalization were thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, fever, and pneumonia. There were no deaths attributed to azacitidine treatment. During the study periods, half of the deaths in the three trials were probably related to MDS and the other half were unrelated to MDS.
The most common reasons for azacitidine discontinuation, dose reduction, or therapy interruption were leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Patients who developed CR or PR first had further decreases in hematologic parameters. Most patients in both treatment arms received packed RBC and/or platelet transfusions and medications to treat adverse events. The frequency of adverse events decreased after the first two cycles of azacitidine therapy.
Liver function abnormalities, which coincided with intercurrent illnesses including hepatobiliary disorders, occurred in about 16% of azacitidine-treated subjects and in 8% of observation subjects. Three patients in the azacitidine arm developed hepatic impairment; two of them had been previously diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. Renal failure developed in five azacitidine arm patients and in one observation arm patient, in settings of sepsis, hypotension, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus.
Adverse events occurred at about the same frequency in males and females and in all age groups.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Azacitidine seems to be a relatively safe drug for a premalignant or malignant condition such as MDS, although adverse events were common. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal, which were prevented or controlled with concomitant medications, and hematologic, which exacerbated the hematopoietic cytopenias characteristic of MDS. The latter finding is consistent with all published studies citing hematologic toxicity as dose limiting. No deaths were attributed to azacitidine in these studies. However, azacitidine was a possible or probable contributor to 21 deaths in cancer patients reported by National Cancer Institute. Most deaths were due to infections, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia.
Hepatic and renal adverse events were rare, possibly because patients with hepatic or renal impairment were excluded from participation in these studies. Prior reports described hepatic coma developing in patients with hepatic metastases from solid tumors (12). Renal function abnormalities had been previously reported in patients treated with combination chemotherapy, some with preexisting renal impairment (12). Hence, caution is advisable in treating patients with hepatic or renal impairment.
The trial protocols specified that subjects should be dismissed from the trial if no response occurred after four cycles of therapy. Fifty of 270 patients (18.5%) in the azacitidine treatment groups in the three trials were discontinued for this reason. However, four cycles of therapy were too few to conclude a lack of efficacy for some patients. CR or PR took longer time to develop.
The CALGB protocols also specified that patients who achieved a CR were to be withdrawn from the study after three further cycles. Most of the CR patients followed this instruction; however, some CR and most PR patients continued to receive azacitidine until they were withdrawn from the study for other reasons. The instructions in the label state that treatment may be continued as long as the patient continues to benefit.
In summary, On May 19, 2004 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved azacitidine as injectable suspension (Vidaza) for treatment of patients with the following MDS subtypes: RA or RARS (if accompanied by neutropenia or thrombocytopenia or requiring transfusions), RAEB, RAEB-T, and CMML. Azacitidine is the first agent approved for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome. Full prescribing information is available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/2004/050794lbl.pdf.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 10/19/04; revised 2/ 9/05; accepted 2/24/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-globin synthesis in a patient with ß+ thalassemia. N Engl J Med 1982;307:146975.[Abstract]
-
-ß-globin gene complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983;80:48426.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Haase, U. Germing, J. Schanz, M. Pfeilstocker, T. Nosslinger, B. Hildebrandt, A. Kundgen, M. Lubbert, R. Kunzmann, A. A. N. Giagounidis, et al. New insights into the prognostic impact of the karyotype in MDS and correlation with subtypes: evidence from a core dataset of 2124 patients Blood, December 15, 2007; 110(13): 4385 - 4395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Yoo, S. Jeong, G. Egger, G. Liang, P. Phiasivongsa, C. Tang, S. Redkar, and P. A. Jones Delivery of 5-Aza-2'-Deoxycytidine to Cells Using Oligodeoxynucleotides Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 67(13): 6400 - 6408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kantarjian, Y. Oki, G. Garcia-Manero, X. Huang, S. O'Brien, J. Cortes, S. Faderl, C. Bueso-Ramos, F. Ravandi, Z. Estrov, et al. Results of a randomized study of 3 schedules of low-dose decitabine in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Blood, January 1, 2007; 109(1): 52 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Raza, F. Z. Raza, N. Galili, H. M. Kantarjian, Y. Oki, and J.-P. Issa Low-dose decitabine and high-risk MDS Blood, December 15, 2006; 108(13): 4291 - 4292. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Mitra, R. H. Datar, and R. J. Cote Molecular Pathways in Invasive Bladder Cancer: New Insights Into Mechanisms, Progression, and Target Identification J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2006; 24(35): 5552 - 5564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Cheson, P. L. Greenberg, J. M. Bennett, B. Lowenberg, P. W. Wijermans, S. D. Nimer, A. Pinto, M. Beran, T. M. de Witte, R. M. Stone, et al. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia Blood, July 15, 2006; 108(2): 419 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Nimer Clinical Management of Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Interstitial Deletion of Chromosome 5q J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 24(16): 2576 - 2582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Vey, A. Bosly, A. Guerci, W. Feremans, H. Dombret, F. Dreyfus, D. Bowen, A. Burnett, M. Dennis, V. Ribrag, et al. Arsenic Trioxide in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Phase II Multicenter Study J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 24(16): 2465 - 2471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Lee, S. Yegnasubramanian, X. Lin, and W. G. Nelson Procainamide Is a Specific Inhibitor of DNA Methyltransferase 1 J. Biol. Chem., December 9, 2005; 280(49): 40749 - 40756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Zerbini and T. A. Libermann GADD45 Deregulation in Cancer: Frequently Methylated Tumor Suppressors and Potential Therapeutic Targets Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 11(18): 6409 - 6413. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |