
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Division of Pancreatic Surgery and Molecular Pancreatic Research, Department of General Surgery, 2 Institute of Immunology, and 3 Department of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Requests for reprints: Helmut Friess, Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Phone: 49-6221-564860; Fax: 49-6221-566903; E-mail: helmut_friess{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: pancreatic cancer radiation chemotherapy anticancer therapy
The heme oxygenase (HO) system catalyzes the degradation of heme to produce equimolar quantities of biliverdin, CO, and free iron (4). Subsequently, biliverdin is converted to bilirubin by cytosolic biliverdin reductase, and free iron is promptly sequestered into ferritin (5, 6). To date, three HO isoforms (HO-1, HO-2, and HO-3) that catalyze this reaction have been identified (79). HO-1 is a 32-kDa inducible heat shock protein, which is found at low levels in most mammalian tissues but is highly induced by a variety of stress stimuli, including heat shock (10), UV irradiation (11), hydrogen peroxide (12, 13), heavy metals (14, 15), hypoxia (16), and cytokines (17, 18). Recent findings indicate that HO-1 and its products possess anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic functions (1922). It represents a key biological molecule in the adaptive response to cellular stress. Moreover, new studies suggest that HO-1 exerts also a role in controlling growth and cell proliferation in a cell-specific manner. Elevated HO-1 expression and activity was found in various tumors such as human renal cell carcinoma (23), prostate tumors (24), and lymphosarcomas (25). In human gliomas and melanomas, HO-1 is linked to angiogenesis (2628), and in an experimental mouse model, HO-1 accelerates pancreatic cancer growth by promoting tumor angiogenesis (28).
These findings suggest that HO-1, with its proangiogenic and growth-regulative properties, may also play a crucial role in the development and progression of pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, its anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic activity implies that HO-1 may enhance radioresistance and chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer cells. We, therefore, hypothesized that the inhibition of HO-1 expression and activity may sensitize pancreatic cancer cells to anticancer treatment modalities.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Normal pancreatic tissue samples were obtained from 20 individuals (7 women and 13 men) who were free of pancreatic disease through an organ donor program. The median age of the organ donors was 46.2 years (range, 20-74 years). All normal tissue samples were obtained from the head of the organ donor's pancreas to ensure comparability with the tumor samples. In all experiments, tissue sections of normal and cancerous pancreas samples were processed simultaneously to ensure comparability of the results. Freshly removed tissue samples were immediately fixed in formaldehyde solution for 12 to 24 hours and embedded in paraffin for immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy. Simultaneously, tissues for RNA extraction were put in RNA Later (Ambion, Huntingdon, United Kingdom) whereas tissue for protein extraction were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen in the operating room upon surgical removal and maintained at 80°C until use. The ethical committee of the University of Bern and Heidelberg approved the study and informed consent was obtained from each patient.
Cell culture. The established human pancreatic cancer cell lines Panc-1, MIa PaCa-2, SU8686, and Colo 357 were used in these experiments. All cells were obtained from American Type Cell Collection (Manassas, VA).
The PANC-1 and MIA PaCa-2 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle high-glucose medium with Na pyruvate (Cell Concepts, Umkirch, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (PAN Biotech GmbH, Aidenbach, Germany), 4 mmol/L Glutamine-L (Life Technologies, Paisley, United Kingdom), and a penicillin-streptomycin solution (100 units/mL and 100 µg/mL, respectively; Life Technologies). The cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere for at least 72 hours before each experiment and harvested after treatment with trypsin-EDTA (Life Technologies).
The SU8686 and Colo 357 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 with L-glutamine (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (PAN Biotech) and a penicillin-streptomycin solution (100 units/mL and 100 µg/mL, respectively; Life Technologies). The cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere for at least 72 hours before each experiment and harvested after treatment with trypsin-EDTA (X1; Life Technologies).
Heme oxygenase-1 small interfering RNA transfection. To study the effects of HO-1 inhibition on cell viability, growth rate, induction of apoptosis, and sensitization to anticancer treatment, HO-1 expression was specifically suppressed by introduction of 21-nucleotide duplex small interfering RNA (siRNA), which targets nucleotides 612 to 630 of the HO-1 mRNA coding sequence (29). The sequences of the ribonucleotides used were 5'-rGACUGCGUUCCUGCUCAACdTdT-3' and 5'-rGUUGAGCAGGAACGCAGUCdTdT-3' (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX; ref. 30). The cells (PANC-1, MIA PaCa-2, SU8686, and Colo 357) were each plated on 6-well plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) in density of 100,000 cells per well and were preincubated overnight, after which 2 µg per well of siRNA was introduced into the cells by using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's directions. The Silencer Negative Control siRNA 1 (Ambion, Austin, TX) was used as a negative control and was introduced into the cells using the same protocol.
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide cell proliferation assay was done to evaluate the effect of transfection with siRNA for HO-1 mRNA (siRNA) on cell growth rate and viability comparing to the transfection with negative control siRNA (control). Cells were seeded in 96-well culture plates (3,000 cells per well) and after overnight preincubation, cells were transfected with 0.3 µg per well siRNA for HO-1 or negative control siRNA as described above. Measurements were done 24, 48, and 72 hours post-transfection and the graphical data represent the percentage of surviving cells in the siRNA group compared with the vehicle group at given time points. Control nontransfected cells were plated on the same experiment plates to assess the normal proliferation rate of the cells.
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. The cells (Panc-1, MIa PaCa-2, SU8686, and Colo 357), transfected with siRNA for HO-1 mRNA or negative control siRNA as described above, were exposed to anticancer treatment, such as
-radiation 20 Gy in "Gammacell 1000" (Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd., Ottawa, Canada) or gemcitabine HCl (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) in cell linespecific EC50 dose (determined on the nontransfected cells; 4 µg/mL for Colo 357, 8 µg/mL for SU8686, 14 µg/mL for MiaPaCa-2, and 150 µg/mL for Panc-1) for 48 hours. As control, cells were exposed to oxidative stress, a known inducer of HO-1. Oxidative stress was induced by 100 mmol/L 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-biperidinum dichloride and 100 mmol/L dd-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine (Sigma-Aldrich GmbH, Steinheim, Germany) for 48 hours. dd-Buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine is very potent irreversible inhibitor of y-glutamylcysteine synthetase, which leads to significant depletion of cellular glutathione levels (31). 1,1'-Dimethyl-4,4'-biperidinum dichloride, a so-called redox-cycling drug, generates continually superoxide (32). The combination of both induces pronounced oxidative stress to the cells (33, 34).
Some cells were grown for 48 hours after transfection without any treatment to determine the effect of HO-1 suppression on cell viability and to compare these results with the cell proliferation assay.
For analysis, cells were trypsinized, harvested, and added to the corresponding supernatant in fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) tubes. Then the pooled cells were pelleted, washed with cold PBS (Cell Concepts), and resuspended while vortexing in 0.4 mL of cold PBS containing 2% fetal bovine serum and 2.5 µg/mL propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). After incubating the cells at 4°C for 10 minutes, flow cytometry with the BD LSR Immunocytometry System (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) was used to analyze the propidium iodide staining and to determine the percentage of viable and necrotic cells. The results are presented as a percentage of viable cells in each group.
Western blot analysis. Total proteins were extracted using Laemmli buffer from treated cultured pancreatic cancer cells and control native cells. From pancreatic tissues (normal pancreas and pancreatic cancer) total protein was obtained by lyzing the appropriate tissue sample (
500 µg) in a buffer containing 20 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mmol/L NaCl, 1% NP40, and protease inhibitor cocktail for mammalian tissue 50 µL per sample (Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
Total proteins were electrophoresed in NuPage MOPS SDS Running Buffer, NuPage 10% Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen) at 200 V. Using the semidry transfer at 0.04 A constant for 1 hour, the proteins were blotted on to Invitrolon polyvinylidene difluoride 0.45-µm pore membrane (Invitrogen). After blocking with 8% milk, the membrane was incubated in a milk solution containing antiHO-1 mouse monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY). The bound antigen-antibody complex was detected by secondary peroxidase-conjugated affinity purified goat anti-mouse antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA) and the chemiluminescence kit (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Inc., Boston, MA). The same membranes were used for blotting with anti-
-tubulin or anti-GABDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) antibody as an internal loading control.
All the Western blot films were scanned with GS-800 Calibrated Densitometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA) and further quantified using the Quantity One Quantification Software according to the manufacturer's guidelines (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
Immunohistochemistry. Frozen pancreatic tissue sections (5-7 µm) were air-dried and fixed in a mixture of ice-cold acetone and 10% formaldehyde for 5 minutes at 20°C.
In paraffin sections, antigen retrieval was completed by microwave cooking at 800 W for 5 minutes (10 minutes cooling at room temperature) and cooking at 400 W 2 x 5 minutes in 10 mmol/L sodium citrate buffer followed by incubation with 0.05% saponin in PBS for 20 minutes at room temperature.
Further procedures for imunohistochemical detection of HO-1 were identical for frozen and paraffin sections. Sections were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody to human HO-1 (Stressgen Biotechnologies Co., Victoria, British Columbia, Canada), diluted 1:250. A mouse monoclonal anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G antibodies, diluted 1:100 (DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark), was used as secondary antibody. For negative controls, incubation with full rabbit serum in dilution corresponding to the concentration of the primary antibody was used.
Fluorescent microscopy. The cells were plated on Teflon-coated slides and fixed by ice-cold methanol for 5 minutes and acetone for 2 minutes, before 0.05% saponin was applied for 20 minutes at room temperature. After rinsing in PBS, nonspecific binding was blocked by preincubating sections with 10% normal goat serum in TBS containing 10%
-avenin and 0.1% BSA-c for 1 hour at room temperature. Sections were incubated with a mouse monoclonal antibody to human HO-1 (BD Biosciences Transduction Laboratories), diluted 1:25 or 1:50 in 10% normal goat serum TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 in 4°C ON.
After rinsing thrice in TBS Tween 0.05% with 1.0% bovine serum albumin, sections were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature without light exposure with goat anti-mouse Cy3-labeled antibodies, diluted 1:400 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Then the slides were further incubated with Toto-3 iodide 1:1,000 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). For negative controls, sections were processed as described earlier, except that the incubation with mouse IgG (DAKO) in dilution 1:10 or 1:20 was employed instead of the primary antibody.
Heme oxygenase-1 activity. Benzene was purchased from AppliChem GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany), and barium chloride-2-hydrate from Sigma-Aldrich (Seelze, Germany). Then cells were lyzed by adding 100 µL of 10x Triton 100-X to each well for 1 hour and 1.0 mL of each culture supernatant was collected into corresponding tubes, and 500 mg of BaCl2 were added to each sample. After vortexing (10-15 seconds), 1.5 mL benzene were added; tubes were vortexed vigorously (50-60 seconds) leading to the formation of a relatively stable milky-white emulsion. After centrifugation (13,000 x g, 30 minutes, without cooling), the upper benzene layer was collected and the absorbance at 450 nm with reference wavelength at 570 nm was measured using a Shimadzu UV-160A spectrophotometer. In a separate tube, 1.0 mL of fresh culture medium was processed in the same way and the benzene layer was collected and used as a blank. The quantity of bilirubin produced was calculated using a molar extinction coefficient of bilirubin dissolved in benzene E450 = 27.3 (mmol/L)1/cm1.
Statistical analysis. The data are presented as mean ± SE or median and range. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For comparison between groups, the Mann-Whitney test was employed.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
HO-1 monoclonal antibody revealed that HO-1 is located in pancreatic cancer cells as well as in immunocytes located next to the tumor mass (Fig. 1C). Pancreatic cancer cell lines showed varying HO-1 mRNA expression levels: PANC-1 and Colo 357 cell lines had very high HO-1 expression levels, whereas MIaPaCa-2 showed low levels of HO-1 mRNA expression. In SU8686 cells HO-1 mRNA expression was not detectable (Fig. 2A and B). By confocal microscopy strong HO-1 signals were present in the cytoplasm of all Panc-1 and Colo 357 cells, whereas only some MiaPaCa-2 cells and none of the SU8686 cells showed positive staining (Fig. 2C).
|
When exposed to continuous oxidative stress, induced by dd-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine and 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-biperidinum dichloride, all four pancreatic cancer cell lines showed a transient up-regulation of HO-1 (Fig. 3). Quantification data from the Western blot revealed that oxidative stress increased the expression of HO-1 protein in Colo 357 by 1.2 times, in Panc-1 by 1.5 times, in MiaPaCa-2 by 3.5 times, and in SU8686 by 8.2 times compared with the nontreated controls. Next, we treated the pancreatic cancer cells with an EC50 dose of gemcitabine for 24 hours or a 20 Gy bolus dosis of
-radiation in vitro. Both treatments resulted in multiple fold increases of HO-1 in all the cell lines and to de novo expression in SU8686, which showed no detectable basal levels of HO-1 (Fig. 3): treatment with gemcitabine increased the expression of HO-1 in Colo 357 by 2.1 times, in Panc-1 by 1.3 times, in MiaPaCa-2 by 1.3, and in SU8686 by 9.6 times, compared with the nontreated controls. The 20 Gy bolus dosis of
-radiation resulted in similar changes in the expression of HO-1, with 2.9-fold increase in Colo 357, 1.3-fold increase in Panc-1, and 8.8-fold increase in SU8686. There was no significant induction of HO-1 observed in the MiaPaCa-2 cell line.
|
|
|
Forty-eight hours after transfection of HO-1 siRNA, the pancreatic cancer cells were exposed to dd-buthionine-[S,R]-sulfoximine and 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-biperidinum dichloride (which mediates oxidative stress), gemcitabine (EC50 dose), or
-radiation (20 Gy). Seventy-two hours later, cell viability was evaluated. HO-1 expression and activity was still suppressed at this time. The inhibition of HO-1 sensitizes pancreatic cancer not only to oxidative stress but also to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We found that decreased expression and activity of HO-1 resulted in increased cell sensitivity to oxidative stress and decreased the numbers of viable cells by 12% to 20% (P < 0.05; Fig. 6A). A 5% to 9% reduction in viability was observed after HO-1 inhibition and chemotherapy with gemcitabine (P < 0.05; Fig. 6B). Finally, a significant sensitization effect of HO-1 inhibition was also observed towards radiotherapy (P < 0.05; Fig. 6C), with an overall reduction of 13% to 23% in cell viability.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Different human cancers express high levels of HO-1, which may provide them a growth advantage (39). Therefore, inhibition of HO-1 might lead to reduced tumor growth in vitro and in vivo (11, 28, 30).
The data presented here show that HO-1 expression is significantly up-regulated in human pancreatic cancer compared with normal pancreatic tissue. A strong overexpression was found in cancer cells but also in immunocytes surrounding the cancer cells.
In human gliomas and melanomas, for example, only tumor-associated macrophages were expressing HO-1 (26, 27, 40, 41), whereas in human prostate, esophageal, tongue, and renal cancer only the tumor cells revealed strong HO-1 signals (23, 24, 42, 43). Expression of HO-1 in macrophages within the tumor seems to correlate with increasing vascular density and therefore ongoing neovascularization, which is known to promote local tumor growth (26, 27, 40, 41). In vitro and in vivo studies in a pancreatic cancer model showed that HO-1 stimulates angiogenesis and increases endothelial cell survival (28, 4447). Furthermore, in melanoma and oligodendroglioma, expression levels of HO-1 in macrophages correlate with tumor cell invasiveness and poor prognosis (27, 40). These data imply that HO-1 plays a role in tumor angiogenesis mediated by activated macrophages and also mediates antiapoptotic effects on endothelial cells.
The strong HO-1 positivity in pancreatic tumor cells in situ and in several pancreatic cancer cell lines points to yet another role of HO-1 in tumor pathogenesis. The expression level varied among cancer cells and also in different cell lines. Direct correlation of the expression level with clinical or histomorphologic data could, however, not be established in this study. In contrast, others observed some prognostic value of HO-1 expression in tumors, although with contradictory results: Yanagawa et al. reported that low level HO-1 is associated with an increased risk of developing lymph node metastasis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma (42). On the other hand, in prostate and melanoma cancers, increasing HO-1 expression was associated with progression (24, 40). Further studies using higher numbers of human pancreatic tumor samples and comparison with inflammatory diseases of the pancreas will be necessary to illustrate the potential prognostic and diagnostic role of HO-1 in pancreatic carcinoma.
Here we show that HO-1 expression is directly associated with the proliferation and/or survival of pancreatic cancer cells. Specific inhibition of HO-1 expression and activity by siRNA tranfection leads to diminished proliferation, which is only partly based on cytotoxicity. As the specific inhibition of HO-1 has only modest effect on the viability of the pancreatic cancer cells, the clearly decreased proliferation rate may be based on direct effect on the cell cycle.
It seems that HO-1 also acts as an endogenous protection mechanism in pancreatic cancer cells, which potentially makes cells more resistant to oxidative stress and apoptotic stimuli, thus providing growth advantage. Moreover, the HO-1 system is known to have direct effects on various components of the cell cycle machinery, which leads to cell-specific promotion or inhibition of cell proliferation depending on the cell type (36). Because tumor growth is based on augmented cell growth and prolonged cell survival (based on resistance to apoptosis), it is possible that HO-1 develops its tumor-promoting activity by increasing cell proliferation and protection towards apoptosis.
More importantly, we show that HO-1 may represent mechanism for pancreatic cancer cells towards anticancer drugs and radiotherapy. The destructive mechanisms of radiotherapy as well as chemotherapy on cancer cells are mainly based on the generation of oxidative stress and/or induction of apoptosis (48). In our present, study we show that radiation as well as gemcitabine (both widely used therapeutic approaches for pancreatic cancer today) lead to the induction of HO-1 in pancreatic cancer cells. This underlines the role of HO-1 as a stress response gene, showing pronounced up-regulation after first time treatment, leading to the resistance of further therapy, a generally known clinical problem in cancer treatment. That inhibition of HO-1 expression and activity in pancreatic cancer cells having high constitutive HO-1 levels enhances their response to radiotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic supports this view. Recent studies in other models made similar observations: induction of HO-1 made leukemia and colon cancer cells resistant to merocyanine and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate, two experimentally used chemotherapeutic drugs (49, 50). In an experimental murine sarcoma model pretreatment with the HO-1 inhibitor PEG-ZnPP augmented the cytotoxic effect of several chemotherapeutics (51).
The molecular basis of these effects on cancers is not yet clear. From other cells and experimental systems, one might hypothesize that three processes induce resistance of cancer cells: (I) HO-1 diminishes the pro-oxidant pool intracellular by degrading heme, increasing cellular iron efflux and inducing the synthesis of ferritin, a strong anti-oxidant; (II) HO-1 metabolites CO and biliverdin/bilirubin revealed antiapoptotic and inflammatory effects; (III) through direct protein-protein interaction, HO-1 may have further enzyme-independent protective functions (35, 52). Furthermore, HO-1 does also directly influences several cell signaling pathway, such as mitogen-activated protein kinases and prostaglandins, which are known to have crucial roles in pancreatic cancer pathogenesis (53). Most probably, ROS play a crucial role, as we show that pure oxidative stress is significantly more effective in killing pancreatic cancer cells after HO-1 inhibition. Irradiation revealed similar enhancement of killing of pancreatic cancer cells, whereas the alteration of the gemcitabine effects was weak to modest. Other HO-1 and ROS-independent pathways may be in case of gemcitabine of more importance.
In future studies, the known pathways have to be evaluated in cancer models both in vitro and in vivo. This will help us gain a better understanding of the treatment resistance processes, especially in pancreatic cancer. We believe further that specific tumor-targeted or even systemic inhibition of HO-1 or its metabolites in vivo could be of great therapeutic benefit because it could sensitize tumor cells to the oxidative burst from inflammatory cells (54, 55). It may also enhance the inflammatory response in tumor tissue and reinforce the host defense system by increasing tumor necrosis factor-
production in macrophages, as some authors suggest that CO derived from heme degradation could potentially inhibit the production of this proinflammatory cytokines in activated macrophages (20, 56).
In conclusion, high HO-1 levels in pancreatic cancer cells may, at least partly, be responsible for their resistance to anticancer therapy. Furthermore, high HO-1 expression seen in human pancreatic cancer may act as endogenous protection mechanism, which is initiated during carcinogenesis to make pancreatic cancer cells resistant to environmental stress such as immune attack, hypoxia, and nutrition deprivation. A better understanding of the exact molecular processes of the HO-1 system in pancreatic carcinogenesis may lead to new therapeutic targets. Perhaps, more important, specific inhibition of HO-1 activity in combination with conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy may open up new perspectives in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Note: P.O. Berberat and Z. Dambrauskas contributed equally to this work.
Received 10/21/04; revised 2/17/05; accepted 2/22/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and interleukin-1
on heme oxygenase-1 expression in human endothelial cells. Am J Physiol 1998;274:88391.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. Evans, F. Niemevz, G. Buldain, and P. O. de Montellano Isoporphyrin Intermediate in Heme Oxygenase Catalysis: OXIDATION OF {alpha}-MESO-PHENYLHEME J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2008; 283(28): 19530 - 19539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Abraham and A. Kappas Pharmacological and Clinical Aspects of Heme Oxygenase Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2008; 60(1): 79 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Martin, T. Tanos, A. B. Garcia, D. Martin, J. S. Gutkind, O. A. Coso, and M. J. Marinissen The G{alpha}12/13 Family of Heterotrimeric G Proteins and the Small GTPase RhoA Link the Kaposi Sarcoma-associated Herpes Virus G Protein-coupled Receptor to Heme Oxygenase-1 Expression and Tumorigenesis J. Biol. Chem., November 23, 2007; 282(47): 34510 - 34524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kondo, K. V. Gleixner, M. Mayerhofer, A. Vales, A. Gruze, P. Samorapoompichit, K. Greish, M.-T. Krauth, K. J. Aichberger, W. F. Pickl, et al. Identification of heat shock protein 32 (Hsp32) as a novel survival factor and therapeutic target in neoplastic mast cells Blood, July 15, 2007; 110(2): 661 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hill-Kapturczak and A. Agarwal Haem oxygenase-1--a culprit in vascular and renal damage? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1495 - 1499. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Evans, F. Xu, M. Sirisawad, R. Miller, L. Naumovski, and P. R. O. de Montellano Motexafin Gadolinium-Induced Cell Death Correlates with Heme oxygenase-1 Expression and Inhibition of P450 Reductase-Dependent Activities Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2007; 71(1): 193 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Was, T. Cichon, R. Smolarczyk, D. Rudnicka, M. Stopa, C. Chevalier, J. J. Leger, B. Lackowska, A. Grochot, K. Bojkowska, et al. Overexpression of Heme Oxygenase-1 in Murine Melanoma: Increased Proliferation and Viability of Tumor Cells, Decreased Survival of Mice Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2006; 169(6): 2181 - 2198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-H. Kweon, V. M. Adhami, J.-S. Lee, and H. Mukhtar Constitutive Overexpression of Nrf2-dependent Heme Oxygenase-1 in A549 Cells Contributes to Resistance to Apoptosis Induced by Epigallocatechin 3-Gallate J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 33761 - 33772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Camp, J. M. Farnham, and L. A. Cannon-Albright Localization of a Prostate Cancer Predisposition Gene to an 880-kb Region on Chromosome 22q12.3 in Utah High-Risk Pedigrees. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 66(20): 10205 - 10212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Marinissen, T. Tanos, M. Bolos, M. R. de Sagarra, O. A. Coso, and A. Cuadrado Inhibition of Heme Oxygenase-1 Interferes with the Transforming Activity of the Kaposi Sarcoma Herpesvirusencoded G Protein-coupled Receptor J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2006; 281(16): 11332 - 11346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||