
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Therapy: Clinical |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute and 2 Department of Hematology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
Requests for reprints: Ryuya Yamanaka, Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Asahimachi-dori 1-757, Niigata City, Japan 951-8585. Phone: 025-227-0651; Fax: 025-223-5287; E-mail: ryaman{at}bri.niigata-u.ac.jp.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design: Twenty-four patients with recurrent malignant glioma (6 grade 3 and 18 grade 4 patients) were evaluated in a phase I/II clinical study of dendritic cell therapy. All patients were resistant to the standard maximum therapy. The patient's peripheral blood dendritic cells were generated with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, plus interleukin 4 with or without OK-432, and pulsed with an autologous tumor lysate. Dendritic cells were injected intradermally, or both intratumorally and intradermally every 3 weeks.
Results: The protocols were well tolerated with only local redness and swelling at the injection site in several cases. Clinical responses were as follows: 1 patient with partial response, 3 patients with minor response, 10 patients with stable disease, and 10 patients with progressive disease. The patients whose dendritic cells were matured with OK-432 had longer survival times than the dendritic cells from patients without OK-432 maturation. The patients with both intratumoral and intradermal administrations had a longer survival time than the patients with intradermal administration only. Increased ELISPOT and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses after vaccination could provide good laboratory markers to predict the clinical outcome of patients receiving dendritic cell vaccination. The overall survival of patients with grade 4 glioma was 480 days, which was significantly better than that in the control group.
Conclusions: This study showed the safety and clinical response of autologous tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell therapy for patients with malignant glioma. Dendritic cell therapy is recommended for further clinical studies in malignant glioma patients.
Key Words: Glioma Dendritic Cell Immunotherapy
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Preparation of tumor lysate. Tumor tissue was removed from the vivid glioma portion seen in the microsurgical scope during operation, and immediately placed in PBS. Adjacent nonglioma tissue was removed using a scalpel, and tumor cells were dispersed to create a single-cell suspension. Aliquots were taken for cell counting and viability staining by trypan blue exclusion. Cells were lysed by three to five freeze cycles in liquid nitrogen and thaw cycles at room temperature. Lysis was monitored by light microscopy. Large particles were removed by centrifugation (15 minutes, 400 x g), and the supernatants were passed through a 0.45 µm filter. The protein content was determined and aliquots were stored at 80°C until use.
Dendritic cell pulsing. After 7 days of culture, semiadherent and nonadherent cells were harvested by pipetting and used as dendritic cells for pulsing with the tumor lysate as described below. In the phase I study, following 7 days of culture, the dendritic cells were cultured overnight with 50 µg/mL keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH; Calbiochem, Bad Soden, Germany) and the tumor lysate. In the phase II study, after 7 days of culture, half of the dendritic cells were cultured overnight with 50 µg/mL KLH and tumor lysate followed by 0.1 KE (KE: clinical unit)/mL penicillin-killed Streptococcus pyogenes (OK-432: Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Tokyo, Japan) for 24 hours. The remaining half of the dendritic cells were cultured overnight with 50 µg/mL KLH and prepared for intratumoral vaccination. Approximately 1 x 107 dendritic cells were cultured with 700 µg of autologous tumor lysate. The cells were washed thrice with PBS and resuspended in RPMI 1640 as described below.
Design of the phase I/II dendritic cell therapy trial. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Niigata University. All patients provided informed consent before treatment. Dendritic cells were injected intradermally, close to a cervical lymph node, or intradermally and intratumorally, via an Ommaya reservoir. Those patients who had a settled Ommaya reservoir at an appropriate tumor cavity received an intratumoral dendritic cell injection. Patients were monitored for immediate and delayed toxicities. All toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. The response to the treatment was evaluated by clinical observations and radiological findings. MRI or computed tomography scanning was done to evaluate the intracranial lesions after the vaccinations every month. Tumor size was estimated as the volume of the region of abnormal enhancement observed on MRI or computed tomography via direct measurement. Responses were classified into the following categories based on the criteria of Macdonald et al. (26): (a) complete response, defined as a disappearance of the entire tumor for at least 4 weeks; (b) partial response, defined as a reduction of 50% or more in the tumor size for at least 4 weeks; (c) minor response, defined as a 25% to 50% decrease of the lesion lasting at least 4 weeks or a more than 50% decrease of the lesion lasting less than 4 weeks; (d) no change, defined as either a decrease of less than 25% or an increase of less than 25% in tumor size for at least 4 weeks; (e) progressive disease, defined as an increase of 25% or more in tumor size. The end points of this study were evaluations of the toxicity, immunologic response, and clinical response after dendritic cell therapy.
Delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction. To test the cell-mediated cytotoxicity response, 0.05 µg purified tuberculin and 10 µg autologous tumor lysate were intradermally administered into the forearm before and after treatment. A positive delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test reaction was defined as >2 mm diameter induration after 48 hours.
IFN-
ELISPOT assay. IFN-
ELISPOT assay was done as previously described (6). Mononuclear cells (2 x 105/well) were used as stimulator cells, and tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells (1 x 104/well) were admixed to each well. A mouse antihuman IFN-
antibody (clone 1-D1K; Mabtech, Nacka, Sweden), biotinylated detection antibody against human IFN-
(clone 7-B6-1; Mabtech), and streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase complex preparation (Mabtech) were used. Spots were counted using a stereomicroscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) at x40 magnification. The cutoff for positive spots was defined as a spot size greater than 3 x SD above the mean value of the spot diameter obtained in the absence of the dendritic cells.
Cell surface analysis. PBMCs were separated from the peripheral blood of patients, resuspended in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma) and 0.1% sodium azide (Sigma), and stained with antihuman CD3, CD4, CD8, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD40, CD86, CD80, CD83, CD56, MHC I, and MHC II monoclonal antibodies (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) for 30 minutes at 4°C. Stained cells were washed and analyzed using FACScan (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Species- and isotype-matched monoclonal antibodies were used as controls.
Statistical analysis. The prevaccination and postvaccination data were compared using Wilcoxon's test. Statistical significance was determined at P < 0.05 level. The survival curves were estimated according to the method of Kaplan and Meier and the curves were compared using the generalized Wilcoxon's test. The log-rank test was used to assess the strength of the association between survival time and single variables corresponding to factors thought to be prognostic for survival. Survival was determined from the date of diagnosis to death or last visit.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Safety of dendritic cell therapy. Patients received the dendritic cells pulsed with the autologous tumor lysate every 3 weeks. The immunization was continued with up to 10 vaccinations, depending on the clinical response. Intradermal or both intratumoral and intradermal vaccinations with dendritic cells were done. Injections of 1 x 106 to 32 x 106 dendritic cell cells were used per vaccination. The mean number of administrations was 7.4 times intradermally and 4.6 times intratumorally, ranging from 1 to 22. The mean total number of inoculated dendritic cells was 5.318 x 107 cells for intradermal injections and 4.235 x 107 cells for intratumoral injections (Table 2). There were no serious adverse effects and no clinical or radiological evidence of autoimmune reactions in any of the patients (Table 2). There were no substantial changes in the results of routine blood tests (data not shown). Patient 6 developed a mild headache lasting a few days after vaccination. In seven cases (cases 4, 6, 12, 16, 20, 21, and 24), mild erythema at the cervical injection site was evident after the third immunization, suggesting that a DTH reaction had occurred.
|
|
|
Detection of tumor lysate-reactive CD8+ T-cells in the blood of glioma patients correlates with longer survival. Blood samples of 16 glioma patients were tested by ELISPOT analysis for the presence of tumor lysate-reactive CD8+ T-cells in PBMC from patients before vaccination and 1 week after the last vaccination. To determine the frequency of tumor lysate-reactive CD8+ T-cells by the IFN-
ELISPOT assay, monocytes were prepared from the blood of the 16 glioma patients, loaded with tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells, and then cocultured. As a negative control, PBMCs were not pulsed with dendritic cells. The results of the ELISPOT analysis are summarized in Fig. 3. T cells reactive against tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells were increased in seven patients after vaccination (P < 0.05). Two of these patients had a partial or minor reaction and five had no change on MRI. On the other hand, only a weak T-cell response against tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells was observed in nine glioma patients after vaccination. Also, the glioblastoma multiforme patients (n = 18) with ELISPOT response after vaccination had a significantly (P = 0.015) longer overall survival time than those without ELISPOT response (Fig. 2D).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Together, these findings show that autologous dendritic cells from tumor-bearing hosts can be expanded ex vivo, pulsed with tumor antigens, and reintroduced to induce tumor-specific T cells. In preclinical models and in clinical trials, these cytokine-stimulated dendritic cells have been successfully pulsed ex vivo with tumor antigens for use as antitumor vaccines against several types of malignancies.
The use of synthetic peptide approaches requires identification of tumor-specific antigens for individual tumors and demonstration of their recognition by CTLs, a process that is difficult. To date, therefore, there has been limited identification of the antigenic peptides and CTL epitopes presented by human gliomas (27). The advantages of vaccinating with total tumor-derived material, such as tumor cell lysates or tumor-derived mRNA, are that the identities of tumor antigens need not be known and that the use of multiple tumor antigens reduces the risk of antigen-negative escape mutants. There have been three reports using tumor-lysate pulsed dendritic cells for patients with recurrent gliomas (6, 7, 25). There were no serious adverse effects and no clinical or radiological evidence of autoimmune reactions in any of the patients in these studies except one patient who repetitively developed peritumoral edema (25). Although there is some probability of shared antigens between tumor and normal central nervous system tissues, and possible contamination of normal tissue in the tumor lysate, no autoimmunity was experienced in vivo. Furthermore, in our in vitro study, dendritic cells pulsed with a normal brain lysate failed to induce cytolytic T-cell activity against autologous glioma cells, suggesting the lack of an autoimmune response (28). The source of the dendritic cells in these cases was immature dendritic cells (6, 7) and mature dendritic cells (25). The administration route was intradermal injection (7, 25), and both intradermal and intratumoral injections (6). Dendritic cell vaccination elicited systemic cytotoxicity detected by IFN-
expression in response to tumor lysate, and intratumoral cytotoxic T-cell infiltration was detected in several patients, although analysis of the function of these infiltrating cells should be carried out more precisely (6, 7, 25). Yu et al. (7) also reported prolonged median survival of 133 weeks in eight glioblastoma patients who received dendritic cell therapy.
Intratumorally injected dendritic cells would acquire and process tumor antigens in situ, migrate to regional lymphoid organs via lymphoid vessels, and initiate a significant tumor-specific immune response (29). It has been reported that dendritic cells have antigen capturing and processing as well as trafficking abilities, only during their immature phase (30). We generated immature-phase dendritic cells that were injected intratumorally in the phase I/II study. This study shows that intratumorally injected dendritic cells induce a more efficient antitumor immunoresponse. In all cases, the dendritic cell preparations were loaded with KLH protein because KLH has been shown to serve as a strong surrogate antigen and an immunogenic marker for immunization studies using dendritic cellbased vaccines (9, 10). In the phase II study, we used mature dendritic cells, differentiated with OK-432, for intradermal vaccinations. Mature dendritic cells are reported to be superior to immature dendritic cells in the induction of antitumor immunologic responses (31, 32). We have experienced longer survival in patients with matured dendritic cell administration. The streptococcal preparation OK-432 is one of the biological response modifiers and has been clinically applied against various types of cancer because of its efficacy in enhancing the antitumor immune response (33, 34). OK-432 augments the cytotoxic activity of various effector cells such as lymphocytes, macrophages, and natural killer cells, and induces the production of multiple cytokines. OK-432 has the ability to induce the production of cytokines by dendritic cells and to promote the maturation of dendritic cells (35, 36). We also experienced increased cell surface expression of CD80, CD83, and CD86, mature phenotype markers of dendritic cells. Dendritic cells matured with OK-432 could be a likely candidate as an adjuvant for dendritic cellbased immunotherapy.
The present results also revealed that increased ELISPOT and DTH responses after vaccination could provide a good laboratory marker to predict the clinical outcome of glioma patients under the dendritic cell vaccination. Of significant importance was that patients treated with dendritic cell vaccinations showed markedly prolonged survival compared with controls who underwent conventional treatment. It should be noted that a compromised immune function is a common feature of advanced malignancy. DTH and ELISPOT responses after vaccination distinguished patients as to their overall survival time, confirming the association of poor immune function and disease progression. The fact that both ELISPOT and DTH responses showed an increase throughout the vaccination period indicates that the administration of dendritic cells has affected the patients' immune system.
Dendritic cell vaccination of patients with glioma seems to be safe and not associated with autoimmunity. In this study, toxicities included mild headache and erythema. Due to the small populations studied thus far, further evaluation of dendritic cell immunotherapy is necessary to determine the optimum dose of dendritic cells, the appropriate route of vaccination, the best source of tumor antigens, and methods of antigen loading. The dendritic cellbased immunotherapy strategy seems a promising approach for inducing an antitumor immune and a clinical response in patients with glioma. The efficacy of such protocols should be determined in randomized, controlled clinical trials. The development of methods for manipulating the vaccination of dendritic cells will enhance the clinical usefulness of dendritic cell based biotherapy for malignant glioma.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 1/16/05; revised 3/ 8/05; accepted 3/11/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene and DCs to intracranial gliomas promotes an effective antitumor response. Gene Ther 2004;11:15518.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. S. Hill, F. Errington, L. P. Steele, A. Merrick, R. Morgan, P. J. Selby, N. T. Georgopoulos, D. M. O'Donnell, and A. A. Melcher OK432-Activated Human Dendritic Cells Kill Tumor Cells via CD40/CD40 Ligand Interactions J. Immunol., September 1, 2008; 181(5): 3108 - 3115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Wheeler, K. L. Black, G. Liu, M. Mazer, X.-x. Zhang, S. Pepkowitz, D. Goldfinger, H. Ng, D. Irvin, and J. S. Yu Vaccination Elicits Correlated Immune and Clinical Responses in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5955 - 5964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. De Vleeschouwer, S. Fieuws, S. Rutkowski, F. Van Calenbergh, J. Van Loon, J. Goffin, R. Sciot, G. Wilms, P. Demaerel, M. Warmuth-Metz, et al. Postoperative Adjuvant Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy in Patients with Relapsed Glioblastoma Multiforme Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 14(10): 3098 - 3104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. King, A.K.M. G. Muhammad, J. F. Curtin, C. Barcia, M. Puntel, C. Liu, S. B. Honig, M. Candolfi, S. Mondkar, P. R. Lowenstein, et al. Flt3L and TK gene therapy eradicate multifocal glioma in a syngeneic glioblastoma model Neuro-oncol, February 1, 2008; 10(1): 19 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Koido, E. Hara, S. Homma, M. Mitsunaga, A. Takahara, E. Nagasaki, H. Kawahara, M. Watanabe, Y. Toyama, S. Yanagisawa, et al. Synergistic Induction of Antigen-Specific CTL by Fusions of TLR-Stimulated Dendritic Cells and Heat-Stressed Tumor Cells J. Immunol., October 1, 2007; 179(7): 4874 - 4883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Haapasalo, K. Nordfors, S. Jarvela, H. Bragge, I. Rantala, A.-K. Parkkila, H. Haapasalo, and S. Parkkila Carbonic anhydrase II in the endothelium of glial tumors: A potential target for therapy Neuro-oncol, July 1, 2007; 9(3): 308 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Koido, E. Hara, S. Homma, A. Torii, M. Mitsunaga, S. Yanagisawa, Y. Toyama, H. Kawahara, M. Watanabe, S. Yoshida, et al. Streptococcal Preparation OK-432 Promotes Fusion Efficiency and Enhances Induction of Antigen-Specific CTL by Fusions of Dendritic Cells and Colorectal Cancer Cells J. Immunol., January 1, 2007; 178(1): 613 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |