Clinical Cancer Research The Science of Cancer Health Disparities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Machlenkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenbach, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Machlenkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenbach, L.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 11, 4955-4961, July 1, 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Combined Dendritic Cell Cryotherapy of Tumor Induces Systemic Antimetastatic Immunity

Arthur Machlenkin1, Ofir Goldberger1, Boaz Tirosh2, Adrian Paz1, Ilan Volovitz1, Erez Bar-Haim1, Sung-Hyung Lee1, Ezra Vadai1, Esther Tzehoval1 and Lea Eisenbach1

Authors' Affiliations: 1 Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel and 2 Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: Lea Eisenbach, Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Phone: 972-8934-3555; Fax: 972-8934-4141; E-mail: lea.eisenbach{at}weizmann.ac.il.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: Cryotherapy of localized prostate, renal, and hepatic primary tumors and metastases is considered a minimally invasive treatment demonstrating a low complication rate in comparison with conventional surgery. The main drawback of cryotherapy is that it has no systemic effect on distant metastases. We investigated whether intratumoral injections of dendritic cells following cryotherapy of local tumors (cryoimmunotherapy) provides an improved approach to cancer treatment, combining local tumor destruction and systemic anticancer immunity.

Experimental Designs: The 3LL murine Lewis lung carcinoma clone D122 and the ovalbumin-transfected B16 melanoma clone MO5 served as models for spontaneous metastasis. The antimetastatic effect of cryoimmunotherapy was assessed in the lung carcinoma model by monitoring mouse survival, lung weight, and induction of tumor-specific CTLs. The mechanism of cryoimmunotherapy was elucidated in the melanoma model using adoptive transfer of T cell receptor transgenic OT-I CTLs into the tumor-bearing mice, and analysis of Th1/Th2 responses by intracellular cytokine staining in CD4 and CD8 cells.

Results: Cryoimmunotherapy caused robust and tumor-specific CTL responses, increased Th1 responses, significantly prolonged survival and dramatically reduced lung metastasis. Although intratumor administration of dendritic cells alone increased the proliferation rate of CD8 cells, only cryoimmunotherapy resulted in the generation of effector memory cells. Furthermore, cryoimmunotherapyprotected mice that had survived primary MO5 tumors from rechallenge with parental tumors.

Conclusions: These results present cryoimmunotherapy as a novel approach for systemic treatment of cancer. We envisage that cryotherapy of tumors combined with subsequent in situ immunotherapy by autologous unmodified immature dendritic cells can be applied in practice.

Minimally invasive therapies are an alternative approach to surgical intervention in the treatment of malignant diseases. Cryoablation, i.e., tissue destruction by repeated deep freezing and thawing, is under the larger category of thermal therapy and, during the past decade, it has become an acceptable clinical tool for the management of dermatologic tumors, hepatocellular carcinoma, renal and prostate tumors, and hepatic colorectal metastases (1, 2). Compared with surgical excision, the main advantages are the potential for less invasiveness resulting in reduced mortality and morbidity, and the ability to perform ablative procedures on outpatients, which decreases the treatment cost. In the case of hepatic colorectal metastases, the use of cryosurgery improves the percentages of resectability (2). A comparative study on domestic pigs showed that the cryoablation of renal parenchyma is beneficial over other necrosis-inducing ablations such as microwave thermoablation, radiofrequency energy, and chemoablation by ethanol, hypertonic saline, and acetic acid gels, in terms of reproducibility, consistency in size and shape, and the ability to monitor by ultrasound (3).

The mechanisms of cryoablation are multifactorial, yet they culminate in necrotic cell death secondary to (a) direct cellular damage by ice crystals, and (b) vascular and endothelial injury with eventual ischemia (4). The freezing-stimulated change in the immune response is another proposed mechanism of cryosurgery. Although few animal models and clinical case studies describe a "cryoimmunologic response" and even spontaneous regression of the metastases following cryoablation (5), the majority of studies prove no change in the immune status (4). Moreover, others suggest suppressed immunity, increased tumor growth, and metastasis after cryoablation of primary tumors (6). The main drawback of cryotherapy, therefore, is that apart from its local effect on tumors, it does not elicit a systemic antitumor response to preclude metastasis.

Immunotherapy, which aims at eliciting or enhancing the body's own capacity to mount an effective antitumor response, is another approach to cancer treatment. Dendritic cells are professional antigen-presenting cells, which are crucially important in antigen capture, processing, and presentation to the effector arm of the immune system. The use of dendritic cells as adjuvant in order to explore immune-mediated resistance to cancer has been supported by many animal experiments as well as initial human trials (7). Mature dendritic cells direct T cell differentiation into effector or memory cells, inducing natural killer cell activation and B cell differentiation into antibody-forming cells (8). Necrotic cell death stimulates dendritic cell maturation (9), therefore, immunotherapies that preferentially promote or increase tumor cell death by necrosis are more likely to induce antigen-specific tumor immunity and rejection. The density of dendritic cells present within tumors correlates with prognosis and their migration from the vicinity of the tumor to the draining lymph nodes is essential for the induction of immunity (10).

In the current study, we investigated the therapeutic value and immune consequences of combined cryotherapy followed by intratumor injection of immature dendritic cells (cryoimmunotherapy) in nonimmunogenic highly metastatic preclinical models. The rationale for cryoimmunotherapy stems from the fact that routine cryotherapy releases, following necrosis, large amounts of tumor antigens and inflammatory signals that are necessary for dendritic cell maturation. We aimed at elucidating whether cryoimmunotherapy is superior to cryo- and immunotherapy alone in terms of antimetastatic effects, survival, and creation of functional antitumor memory.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice and cell lines. Eight to 12, 12-week-old OT-I T cell receptor (V{alpha}2/Vß5) transgenic mice, encoding a T cell receptor specific for the ovalbumin epitope (SIINFEKL-H-2Kb; ref. 11) and C57BL/6 mice were bred in the Weizmann Institute. All mouse experiments were approved and conducted under Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines and according to the Helsinki Declaration.

3LL Lewis lung carcinoma and B16 melanoma clones, of C57BL/6 origin, were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, L-glutamine, sodium pyruvate, nonessential amino acids, and penicillin/streptomycin. Clone D122-3LL is a low Kb-expressor, highly metastatic, and poorly immunogenic. Kb39.5 is a Kb-transfected D122 clone. MO5, ovalbumin-transfected B16 and Kb39.5 cells were maintained in 500 µg/mL G-418.

Tumor growth and spontaneous metastasis. For the D122 spontaneous metastasis model, 8 to 11 mice per group were inoculated at the intrafootpad with 2 x 105 cells per mouse. When the tumor reached 8 mm in diameter, the tumor-bearing leg was amputated below the knee (12). Mice were monitored daily and sacrificed when moribund or 23 to 30 days post-amputation. Lung metastatic load was assessed by weighing. Survival was defined as the day when mice were sacrificed.

For the MO5 model, 106 cells per mouse were inoculated intrafootpad. Ten days later, when the tumor reached 3 to 4 mm in diameter, the mice were treated (as described below) and injected with OT-1 CD8 T cells. Mice that rejected the MO5 tumor (about 50% of total) were rechallenged, at day 60 post-rejection, with 106 B16-F1 cells s.c. in the upper back. Tumor take and growth were monitored over 90 days.

Generation of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow. The procedure was described by Lutz at al. (13) and used with minor modifications. C57BL/6 BM cells (4 x 106) were cultured in 100 mm bacteriologic plates (Falcon) in 10 mL dendritic cell medium supplemented with 200 units/mL recombinant murine granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Prospec, Israel). On day 3, another 10 mL dendritic cell medium containing 200 units/mL granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor were added to the plates. On day 6, half of the culture supernatant was replaced with fresh dendritic cell medium containing 200 units/mL granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. On day 8, nonadherent cells were collected, resuspended in 10 mL fresh dendritic cell medium containing 100 units/mL granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor and seeded in 100 mm tissue culture plates (Falcon). On day 9, nonadherent cells with the typical characteristics of immature dendritic cells (>95% CD11c+, CD80low, CD86low, MHC IIlow) were harvested, washed, and resuspended in PBS at 4 x 107 cells/mL before injection.

Treatment modes. Mice were treated when tumors reached 3 to 4 mm in diameter. In the single immunotherapy, the animals were injected intratumorally with 106 immature dendritic cells in a volume of 50 µL. In the combined treatment, local cryotherapy was followed by intratumoral injection of 106 immature dendritic cells. Anesthetized mice (ketamine-HCL, 100 mg/kg, i.p.) underwent cryotherapy by applying mild pressure for 10 seconds with frozen tweezers (which were kept in liquid nitrogen) to the tumor-bearing foot. The ice ball reached the size of 5 mm. To ensure complete thawing of the treated area before vaccination, mice were immunized after 1 hour. For the D122 spontaneous metastasis model, mice were treated twice at weekly intervals. For the MO5 model, mice were treated once followed by adoptive transfer of OT-I CD8 T cells. All control groups received PBS.

In vitro cytotoxicity assay. D122 carcinoma-bearing C57BL/6 mice were treated in situ twice with weekly intervals as follows: cryotherapy, intratumor injection of 106 immature dendritic cells, combination of either in situ or i.v. dendritic cell injection following cryotherapy. The control group received intratumor injections of PBS. Spleens were harvested from mice 10 days after the last treatment/immunization. Splenocytes were restimulated in vitro for 5 days on mitomycin C (80 µg/mL) treated and irradiated (5,000 rad) Kb39.5 tumor monolayers in RPMI-HEPES medium containing 10% FCS, 1 mmol/L glutamine, combined antibiotics, 1 mmol/L sodium pyruvate, 10 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.4), 5 x 10–5 mol/L ß-mercaptoethanol, and 1% nonessential amino acids. Viable lymphocytes (effector cells) were separated by lympholyte-M (Cedarlane Laboratories Ltd., Hornby, Ontario, Canada) centrifugation, resuspended in RPMI-HEPES medium, and admixed at different ratios with 5 x 103 [35S]-L-methionine labeled target cells. CTL assays were done in U-shaped microtiter wells at 37°C, 5% CO2, for 5 hours (14). Cultures were terminated by centrifugation at 50 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C. A total of 50 µL of the supernatants was mixed with scintillation fluid and measured in a ß counter (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Percentage of specific lysis was calculated as follows:

Spontaneous release was determined by incubation of 100 µL labeled target cells with 100 µL of medium. Maximal release was determined by lysis of target cells in 100 µL 0.1 N NaOH.

Adoptive transfer of OT-I CD8 T cells and flow cytometry. CD8+ T cells from OT-I spleens were purified (>95%) by magnetic cell sorting (Mitenyi, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. CD8+ T cells (2 x 106) were transferred by i.v. injection into tumor-bearing C57BL/6 recipients, previously treated as described above.

In some experiments, cells were labeled with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Animals were sacrificed on the indicated days after cell transfer or on day 60 following tumor rejections. Cells from draining lymph nodes and spleens were stained with anti-CD8-APC, anti-V{alpha}2-PE, anti-CD44-FITC, anti-CD62L-PE, anti-CD69-FITC, or isotype control monoclonal antibody (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and analyzed by FACSort and CellQuest software (BD). For the CFSE experiments, fluorescence levels were detected on CD8+V{alpha}2+ gated populations.

Intracellular cytokine staining. The frequency of IFN-{gamma} or IL-4-producing cells in spleens of treated MO5 tumor bearing or naïve C57BL/6 mice (three per group) was detected, 8 days following treatment, using the Cytofix/Cytoperm Plus Kit with GolgiPlug (BD). Cells (1 x 106) were cultured for 6 hours in 50 ng/mL of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 750 ng/mL ionomycin (Sigma). Brefeldin A (10 µg/mL, GolgiPlug) was added for the last 4 hours to enable intracellular proteins to accumulate. Then, the cells were harvested, suspended in staining buffer (PBS with 1% FCS and 0.1% sodium azide) and blocked with purified anti-Fc{gamma}RII/III monoclonal antibody (2.4G2, eBioscience, San Diego, CA) for 15 minutes at 4°C, and surfaces stained with antigen-presenting cell–conjugated anti-CD4 or CD8 (e-Bioscience) for 30 minutes. at 4°C. The cells were washed with staining buffer, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at 4°C and washed twice. Then permeabilized in PBS containing 5% FCS, 0.1% saponin and 0.1% sodium azide for 15 minutes at 4°C and incubated in the presence of FITC conjugated anti-mouse IFN-{gamma} (XMG1.2), IL-4 (BVD6-24G2), or isotype control (all eBioscience). Fifty x 103 events were collected for each sample. The data were analyzed using Cell Quest software (BD).

Statistical analysis. The data obtained in the CTL assays were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and significance was assessed by the Tukey-Kramer test. Statistical analysis of the metastatic loads was done with unpaired Welch t test. Dunnett multiple comparison test and log-rank test were applied for survival analysis. Fisher exact test was applied to analyze the results of mouse survival following rechallenge with secondary tumors.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
To study the influence of the proposed treatment on systemic antitumor immunity, we examined the induction of CTL responses in D122 tumor-bearing mice following cryo-, immune-, or cryoimmunotherapy, as described in Materials and Methods. The results showed induction of antitumor CTL responses in mice that were injected intratumorally with dendritic cells (Fig. 1A). The effect of local immunotherapy was significant at effector-to-target ratios of 100:1 and 50:1 (P = 0.001) compared with untreated or cryotreated mice, respectively. The highest amount of tumor-specific CTL activity was obtained when dendritic cells were injected intratumorally following in situ cryotherapy. Compared with immunotherapy, the combined treatment induced significantly higher lysis (P = 0.005) at all effector-to-target ratios. CTLs were tumor-specific; they lysed D122 cells, but not irrelevant B16 melanoma cells. Cryotherapy alone or combined with i.v. administration of dendritic cells was ineffective in generating antitumor CTLs (Fig. 1A).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 1. Induction of antitumor systemic immunity by cryoimmunotherapy. A, tumor-specific CTL activity in tumor-bearing mice following in situ cryoimmunotherapy. D122 carcinoma-bearing C57BL/6 mice were treated in situ twice with weekly intervals as follows: cryotherapy (Cryo), intratumor injection of 106 immature dendritic cells (DC i.t.), combination of either in situ (DC i.t. + Cryo) or i.v. (DC i.v. + Cryo) dendritic cell injection following cryotherapy. Ten days after the last treatment, splenocytes were restimulated on irradiated and mitomycin C-treated 39.5 cells for 5 days, and reacted with 5,000 35S-methionine-labeled D122 (specific targets, left) or B16 melanoma (nonspecific targets, right) cells for 5 hours at 37°C, as described in Materials and Methods. The effector-to-target ratios of 100:1, 50:1, 25:1 are shown. Spontaneous release did not exceed 20% of maximal release. Results are representative of three independent experiments. B, protection from D122 metastasis by in situ cryoimmunotherapy. C57BL/6 (8 mice per group) were inoculated intrafootpad with 2 x 105 D122 cells. Two weeks later, the tumors, 3 to 4 mm in diameter, were treated as designated. When tumors reached diameters of 8 mm, tumor-bearing feet were surgically removed and 23 to 30 days later, in accordance with the death of the control group, mice were sacrificed and lung weight representing metastatic load was determined. The results are presented as mean lung weight (mg) ± SD. Dotted line, normal lung weight. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired Welch t test: *, P = 0.0034; **, P = 0.0019; ***, P < 0.0001.

 
To examine whether cryoimmunotherapy-induced antitumor immunity has a protective antimetastatic impact, we used a spontaneous metastasis tumor model. Mice were inoculated intrafootpad with D122 cells and the resulting primary lesions were treated in situ by cryo-, immune-, or cryoimmunotherapy. To examine the importance of locally performed immunotherapy, as compared with distal administration of dendritic cells, we injected dendritic cells i.p. with or without cryotherapy of the primary lesions. Intratumor injections of dendritic cells significantly reduced metastatic spread compared with untreated (P = 0.0019) or cryotreated (P = 0.0034) mice (Fig. 1B). In concordance with the CTL results, combined cryoimmunotherapy of primary lesions was superior to immunotherapy alone (P < 0.0001). No antimetastatic effect was observed in mice, in which dendritic cells were given i.p.

Alternatively, tumor-bearing feet of the mice were amputated and their post-surgical survival was monitored. Only mice that were treated in situ by cryoimmunotherapy had statistically significant increase of survival (P = 0.005) in comparison with untreated mice (Fig. 2). Five out of 10 mice from the group that underwent local cryoimmunotherapy were alive at day 32 following amputations, whereas no other mice survived at that time point. Thus, cryoimmunotherapy of primary lesions led to induction of tumor-specific CTLs and an antimetastatic effect, as a result.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2. Local cryoimmunotherapy results in prolonged animal survival following surgical removal of the primary tumors. Survival of C57BL/6 mice (10-11 mice per group) was monitored over time after surgical removal of the intrafootpad-implanted primary D122 tumors, which were treated as designated. Percentage of survival of the treated groups are plotted against the days after the amputation of tumor-bearing feet. Statistical significance was determined by the log-rank test analyzing survival of mice treated by DC i.t + Cryo in relation to other groups as follows: untreated (P = 0.0092), Cryo (P = 0.0042), DC i.t. (P = 0.0219), DC i.p. (P = 0.0071), DC i.p. + Cryo (P = 0.0011).

 
We then sought to elucidate the mechanism of cryoimmunotherapy-induced antitumor immunity, using an adoptive transfer model. OT-I mouse-derived naïve CD8 T cells specific to Kb-SIINFEKL (ovalbumin257-265) were transferred into C57BL/6 mice bearing B16-MO5 melanomas expressing ovalbumin. The treatment effect on kinetics of CTL proliferation was assessed by prelabeling of the cells with CFSE. Upon cell division, CFSE is distributed equally between daughter cells, allowing the resolution of up to eight cycles of cell division by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 3, mice treated with cryotherapy alone showed a modest degree of OT-I cell proliferation that was indistinguishable from that seen in untreated mice. In contrast, intratumor dendritic cell administration, alone or following cryotherapy, triggered vigorous CD8 T cell proliferation in draining lymph nodes and spleens of tumor-bearing mice, resulting in increase of the proportion of cells that divided for seven to eight times to 65% and 66%, as compared with only 34% and 35% in nontreated or cryotreated mice, respectively (Fig. 3). To examine whether the extensive proliferation of these cells is accompanied by changes in their activation status, we evaluated expression patterns of activation-related cell-surface molecules. Expressions of the early activation marker CD69, as well as of adhesion molecules CD44 and CD62L were found to be comparable in all tested groups.3 These findings indicate that cryoimmunotherapy does not increase the percentage of activated CD8 lymphocytes, but rather affects their proliferation to the same extent as in situ immunotherapy alone.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 3. Cell division history of adoptively transferred OT-I mouse-derived CD8 T cells. The extent of cell division, based on CFSE fluorescence, in the OT-I-derived naïve CD8 lymphocytes was examined 1, 3 and 4 days post-transfer to C57BL/6 tumor-bearing mice following single cryo- or immunotherapy or combined cryoimmunotherapy, as described. Histograms displaying CFSE fluorescence are gated on CD8+ lymphocytes. Results are shown for a representative mouse from groups of three, and similar results were obtained in three independent experiments.

 
We then addressed the fate of adoptively transferred CD8 T cells either in mice that were treated in situ with dendritic cells alone or in combination with cryotherapy. To this end, the phenotypes of memory CD8 T cells were studied in mice on day 60 following adoptive transfer–induced tumor rejections. At this time point, memory CD8 T cells express high levels of CD44 (15), whereas CD62L expression may vary from low/intermediate for the effector memory subset (Tme), to high for the central memory population (Tmc; ref. 16). Intratumor injections of dendritic cells (± cryotherapy) increased the subset of CD44+CD8+, as compared with cryotreated or untreated mice (Fig. 4A). The percentage of CD8+CD44+ T cells derived from naïve mice was comparable with that of cryotreated or untreated tumor-bearing mice.3. Sixty days following tumor rejections, transferred CD8 T cells in untreated or cryotreated mice mostly (77%) expressed high levels of CD62L, reflecting a naïve (CD44low, CD62Lhigh) cell population. In contrast, CD8+ T cells derived from the mice following cryoimmunotherapy were mainly (59%) CD62L-negative, supporting the existence of an effector memory (CD44high, CD62Llow) cell population (Fig. 4). To examine the functional value of the antitumor memory, the mice that had survived primary B16-MO5 tumors following adoptive transfer and indicated treatments were rechallenged with secondary B16-F1 (ovalbumin-negative) tumors and monitored for survival. As shown in Table 1, only cryoimmunotherapy induces statistically significant protection (six out of seven mice) from the secondary tumors for >90 days (P = 0.010 and P = 0.029, compared with nontreated and cryotreated mice, respectively). Immunotherapy alone was much less potent (three out of eight, P > 0.5, compared with either nontreated or cryotreated mice) and cryotherapy alone was almost ineffective (one out of seven). Hence, cryoimmunotherapy induced an effector memory CD8 T subset, which was probably important for protection against the secondary tumors.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 4. CD44 and CD62L expression on the transferred CD8 T cells 60 days following tumor rejection. OT-I-derived naïve CD8 lymphocytes were transferred into C57BL/6 MO5 melanoma-bearing mice that underwent intralesional cryotherapy, immunotherapy, or combined cryoimmunotherapy, as described. The control group was adoptively transferred only with no additional treatment. The adoptive transfer resulted in tumor rejection in 50% to 60% of mice. Sixty days following tumor rejection, the draining lymph node-derived lymphocytes were stained with anti-CD8, anti-V{alpha}2, anti-CD44 (A) or anti-CD62L (B) antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. The cells were gated on CD8+V{alpha}2+ lymphocytes. Results are shown for a representative mouse from groups of three, and similar results were obtained in three independent experiments.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Protection against parental tumor rechallenge in primary tumor–rejecting mice

 
Because type 1 and type 2 CD8 and CD4 T cell responses may influence antitumor reactions, we next evaluated the cytokine-releasing profiles of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells following cryo-, immuno-, or combined cryoimmunotherapy of MO5-bearing mice. Type 1 (IFN-{gamma}) and type 2 (IL-4) cytokine profiles were examined by intracellular staining and flow cytometry. The levels of CD8+ T cells producing IFN-{gamma} were 2- to 3-fold higher in immuno- or combined cryoimmunotherapy-treated mice relative to nontreated or cryotherapy treated recipients.3 This was observed in draining lymph nodes on days 1 and 8 post-treatment. No staining for IL-4 was found in CD8+ T cells. The proportion of CD4+ T cells predominantly producing IFN-{gamma} (Th1 type) was markedly higher in mice treated by cryoimmunotherapy as compared with other groups (Fig. 5). The percentage of CD4+ T cells producing IL-4 (Th2 type) was increased in dendritic cell–treated mice and was similar to that in mice following combined treatment. This suggests that IFN-{gamma}-producing Th1 rather than Th2 responses were induced by in situ cryoimmunotherapy.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 5. Intracellular IFN-{gamma} or IL-4 expression by CD4 T cells following stimulation with PMA and ionomycin. Eight days post-treatment, splenocytes were stimulated with PMA and ionomycin in the presence of brefeldin A as described in Materials and Methods. The cells were gated on CD4 T cells that expressed a given cytokine. Columns, means; bars ±SD (n = 3/group).

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Cryosurgery has reemerged as an in situ treatment for various, primarily urologic malignancies (17). At present, local destruction of tumor masses by freezing and thawing provides a conventional estimate for the clinical use of cryotherapy, whereas the antimetastatic effect is considered negligible (4). Numerous studies revealed reduced immune responses and elevated metastasis following cryosurgery (4, 18). There is evidence that by combining immunoadjuvants with cryosurgery, one may augment the host systemic antitumor immune response. A short list of studies addressing this issue includes intralesional injections of bacille Calmette-Guérin in animal models and in clinical settings (19, 20), as well as systemic administration of protein-bound polysaccharide in a murine model (18).

This is the first study to address the influence of in situ administration of immature dendritic cells following cryotherapy of primary tumors on systemic antitumor immunity. Our findings that show induction of tumor-specific CTL, of Th1-type helper cells, strong antimetastatic effects, and prolonged survival of cryoimmunotherapy-treated mice (Figs. 1 and 2), support the assumption that in situ injection of immature unloaded dendritic cells following cryosurgery has several advantages over cryosurgery alone or the use of ex vivo matured, antigen-loaded dendritic cells.

First, the destruction of the large tumor mass by cryotherapy leaves only minimal tumor burden to be dealt with by the immune system. Antitumor immune responses alone commonly failed to overcome billions of rapidly dividing tumor cells. Thus, removal of the primary tumor may markedly enhance the chances of successful destruction of residual cells or distant metastases. Second, as the dendritic cells are injected straight into the tumor, it is expected that the large majority will take up antigen for presentation to lymphocytes. This is of importance, because most studies present data showing that only a small proportion of dendritic cells injected by other routes arrived at the target organ (21). Furthermore, direct intratumor injection of genetically modified dendritic cells or coadministration of dendritic cells and adenoviral vector expressing CD40 ligand reduces the incidence and growth of tumors in preclinical models (22, 23). In agreement with these data, intratumor administration of dendritic cells raised tumor-specific CTL and Th1-type CD4 cells, and decreased metastatic burden in a spontaneous metastasis model, whereas dendritic cells injected i.v. or i.p. failed to do so (Fig. 1). Finally, the microenvironment of the freeze-thawed tumor-containing inflammatory cytokines is an excellent milieu for the maturation of dendritic cells into cells which will process and present a wide spectrum of tumor cell antigens in the context of type 1 cellular responses. Indeed, combined cryoimmunotherapy induced the highest levels of IFN-{gamma}-producing CD4+ cells (Fig. 5) as well as CTLs. The capacity of dendritic cells to expand cancer-directed immune responses is well-documented, whereas the mode of dendritic cell maturation and loading methods often determine the fate of the immune response toward either stimulation or tolerance (24, 25). Immature rather then mature dendritic cells are particularly efficient at antigen ingestion and processing (25). There is evidence that dying cells are captured 5-fold better by immature compared with mature dendritic cells (26). Only fully mature dendritic cells, which express high levels of MHC class I and class II and costimulatory molecules, as well as produce large amounts of the proinflammatory cytokines and IL-2, induce T-cell immunity (27). Furthermore, the mode of tumor cell death may determine whether T cell activation or T cell tolerance occurs. Current evidence suggests that necrotic rather then apoptotic cell death provides the necessary signals for the full activation of dendritic cells, which promotes T cell responses (26). Indeed, our findings indicate that compared with immunotherapy alone, cryotherapy-induced necrotic tumor cell death prior to dendritic cell administration markedly enhances systemic antitumor immunity.

CD8 T cells play an essential role in immunity against cancer, and are the most specific and functionally active effector cells. A predominant role of CD8 T cells in tumor growth inhibition upon intratumor administration of dendritic cells has been reported (28). Using adoptive transfer of purified CD8 T cells specific to Kb-SIINFEKL into melanoma-bearing mice, we elucidated the kinetics of CD8 T cell proliferation following priming. In situ administration of dendritic cells triggered robust proliferation of the transferred T cells, as compared with cryotherapy alone (Fig. 3). The extremely high (Kd = 10–14) affinity of the transgenic T cell receptor to its complex could account for the lack of additional enhancement of the proliferation rate in mice that underwent cryoimmunotherapy. T cell clones with low-affinity T cell receptors are expanded by prolonged exposure to high doses of antigens (29). Therefore, one may assume that such polyclonal T cell responses occur upon cryoimmunotherapy and contribute to the observed antitumor immunity. In this regard, cryoimmunotherapy protected mice that had survived primary MO5 melanomas from rechallenge with parental B16-F1 clone (Table 1). Given that B16-F1 cells do not expresses ovalbumin and, therefore, are not a direct target for OT-I T cells, epitope spread, and polyclonal T cell responses seem to underlie the observed protection. Finally, the data in Fig. 4 shows the existence of effector memory CD8 T cells in mice after cryoimmunotherapy. These cells are preferably CD44highCD62Llow, produce high levels of effector cytokines, and contain perforin (15, 16). Recent evidence has shown that cancer patient–derived memory T cell subsets can efficiently recognize and reject autologous breast tumors (30). This is of importance because induction of functional memory could provide an additional estimate of clinical use of cryoimmunotherapy.

In conclusion, this study presents a novel approach for systemic treatment of cancer. We envisage that cryotherapy of tumors combined with subsequent in situ immunotherapy by autologous unmodified immature dendritic cells can be applied in practice. It was shown in animal models that intratumor delivery of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes tumor rejection (31). The use of immunomodulators that recruit and activate dendritic cells might potentially substitute for direct intratumor injection of ex vivo-generated cells. Our future studies will address this issue.


   Footnotes
 
Grant support: Israel Science Foundation, the Israel Cancer Research Fund, the Horowitz Foundation, and the Ornest Family Fund (to L. Eisenbach).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

3 Unpublished data. Back

Received 11/24/04; revised 4/13/05; accepted 4/20/05.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Johnson DB, Nakada SY. Cryoablation of renal and prostate tumors. J Endourol 2003;17:627–32.[Medline]
  2. Adam R, Lucidi V, Bismuth H. Hepatic colorectal metastases: methods of improving resectability. Surg Clin North Am 2004;84:659–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Rehman J, Landman J, Lee D, et al. Needle-based ablation of renal parenchyma using microwave, cryoablation, impedance- and temperature-based monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency, and liquid and gel chemoablation: laboratory studies and review of the literature. J Endourol 2004;18:83–104.[Medline]
  4. Hoffmann NE, Bischof JC. The cryobiology of cryosurgical injury. Urology 2002;60:40–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Ablin RJ, Soanes WA, Gonder MJ. Elution of in vivo bound antiprostatic epithelial antibodies following multiple cryotherapy of carcinoma of prostate. Urology 1973;2:276–9.[Medline]
  6. Yamashita T, Hayakawa K, Hosokawa M, et al. Enhanced tumor metastases in rats following cryosurgery of primary tumor. Gann 1982;73:222–8.[Medline]
  7. Steinman RM, Dhodapkar M. Active immunization against cancer with dendritic cells: the near future. Int J Cancer 2001;94:459–73.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ardavin C, Amigorena S, Reis e Sousa C. Dendritic cells: immunobiology and cancer immunotherapy. Immunity 2004;20:17–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Gallucci S, Lolkema M, Matzinger P. Natural adjuvants: endogenous activators of dendritic cells. Nat Med 1999;5:1249–55.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Tsujitani S, Kakeji Y, Watanabe A, Kohnoe S, Maehara Y, Sugimaghi K. Infiltration of S-100 protein positive dendritic cells and peritoneal recurrence in advanced gastric cancer. Int Surg 1992;77:238–41.[Medline]
  11. Hogquist KA, Jameson SC, Heath WR, Howard JL, Bevan MJ, Carbone FR. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell 1994;76:17–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Eisenbach L, Hollander N, Greenfeld L, Yakor H, Segal S, Feldman M. The differential expression of H-2K versus H-2D antigens, distinguishing high-metastatic from low-metastatic clones, is correlated with the immunogenic properties of the tumor cells. Int J Cancer 1984;34:567–73.[Medline]
  13. Lutz MB, Kukutsch N, Ogilvie AL, et al. An advanced culture method for generating large quantities of highly pure dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow. J Immunol Methods 1999;223:77–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Carmon L, Bobilev-Priel I, Brenner B, et al. Characterization of novel breast carcinoma-associated BA46-derived peptides in HLA-A2.1/D(b)-ß2m transgenic mice. J Clin Invest 2002;110:453–62.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Dutton RW, Bradley LM, Swain SL. T cell memory. Annu Rev Immunol 1998;16:201–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 1999;401:708–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Han KR, Belldegrun AS. Third-generation cryosurgery for primary and recurrent prostate cancer. BJU Int 2004;93:14–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Urano M, Tanaka C, Sugiyama Y, Miya K, Saji S. Antitumor effects of residual tumor after cryoablation: the combined effect of residual tumor and a protein-bound polysaccharide on multiple liver metastases in a murine model. Cryobiology 2003;46:238–45.[Medline]
  19. Javadpour N, Bagley DH, Zbar B. Failure of cryosurgical treatment of experimental intradermal tumors to eradicate microscopic lymph node metastases in guinea pigs. J Natl Cancer Inst 1979;62:1479–81.
  20. Iavorskii VV, Karaseva VV, Tokareva ZI. Combined treatment of patients with metastases of skin melanoma using cryotherapy. Vopr Onkol 1988;34:799–803.[Medline]
  21. Barratt-Boyes SM, Zimmer MI, Harshyne LA, et al. Maturation and trafficking of monocyte-derived dendritic cells in monkeys: implications for dendritic cell-based vaccines. J Immunol 2000;164:2487–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Melero I, Duarte M, Ruiz J, et al. Intratumoral injection of bone-marrow derived dendritic cells engineered to produce interleukin-12 induces complete regression of established murine transplantable colon adenocarcinomas. Gene Ther 1999;6:1779–84.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Kikuchi T, Miyazawa N, Moore MA, Crystal RG. Tumor regression induced by intratumor administration of adenovirus vector expressing CD40 ligand and naive dendritic cells. Cancer Res 2000;60:6391–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Schuler G, Schuler-Thurner B, Steinman RM. The use of dendritic cells in cancer immunotherapy. Curr Opin Immunol 2003;15:138–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Figdor CG, de Vries IJ, Lesterhuis WJ, Melief CJ. Dendritic cell immunotherapy: mapping the way. Nat Med 2004;10:475–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Sauter B, Albert ML, Francisco L, Larsson M, Somersan S, Bhardwaj N. Consequences of cell death: exposure to necrotic tumor cells, but not primary tissue cells or apoptotic cells, induces the maturation of immunostimulatory dendritic cells. J Exp Med 2000;191:423–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Lutz MB, Schuler G. Immature, semi-mature and fully mature dendritic cells: which signals induce tolerance or immunity? Trends Immunol 2002;23:445–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Candido KA, Shimizu K, McLaughlin JC, et al. Local administration of dendritic cells inhibits established breast tumor growth: implications for apoptosis-inducing agents. Cancer Res 2001;61:228–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Anderton SM, Radu CG, Lowrey PA, Ward ES, Wraith DC. Negative selection during the peripheral immune response to antigen. J Exp Med 2001;193:1–11.
  30. Beckhove P, Feuerer M, Dolenc M, et al. Specifically activated memory T cell subsets from cancer patients recognize and reject xenotransplanted autologous tumors. J Clin Invest 2004;114:67–76.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Ali SA, Lynam J, McLean CS, et al. Tumor regression induced by intratumor therapy with a disabled infectious single cycle (DISC) herpes simplex virus (HSV) vector, DISC/HSV/murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, correlates with antigen-specific adaptive immunity. J Immunol 2002;168:3512–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
H. Nishida, H. Tsuchiya, and K. Tomita
Re-implantation of tumour tissue treated by cryotreatment with liquid nitrogen induces anti-tumour activity against murine osteosarcoma
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2008; 90-B(9): 1249 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
O. Goldberger, I. Volovitz, A. Machlenkin, E. Vadai, E. Tzehoval, and L. Eisenbach
Exuberated Numbers of Tumor-Specific T Cells Result in Tumor Escape
Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 68(9): 3450 - 3457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
A. Machlenkin, R. Uzana, S. Frankenburg, G. Eisenberg, L. Eisenbach, J. Pitcovski, R. Gorodetsky, A. Nissan, T. Peretz, and M. Lotem
Capture of Tumor Cell Membranes by Trogocytosis Facilitates Detection and Isolation of Tumor-Specific Functional CTLs
Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 68(6): 2006 - 2013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Udagawa, C. Kudo-Saito, G. Hasegawa, K. Yano, A. Yamamoto, M. Yaguchi, M. Toda, I. Azuma, T. Iwai, and Y. Kawakami
Enhancement of Immunologic Tumor Regression by Intratumoral Administration of Dendritic Cells in Combination with Cryoablative Tumor Pretreatment and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Cell Wall Skeleton Stimulation
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7465 - 7475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Machlenkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenbach, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Machlenkin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenbach, L.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online