
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Therapy: Preclinical |
Authors' Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
Requests for reprints: Alan L. Epstein, Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2011 Zonal Avenue, HMR 205, Los Angeles, CA 90033. Phone: 323-442-1172; Fax: 323-442-3049; E-mail: aepstein{at}usc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: In this report, enhanced apoptosis was observed by treating CD20+ lymphoma cells with a new polymer formulation of Rituximab. The polymer was produced by formation of a peptide bond using the sugar moiety of dextran (MW 6,000) to generate a clinically relevant reagent for use in vivo.
Results: Comparison of Rituximab with a previously described dimer and the newly generated polymer shows that the polymer induced apoptosis more effectively in CD20+ cells as shown by the terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferasemediated dUTP nick end labeling assay (Rituximab, 3%; dimer, 3%; polymer, 58%). Consistent with these results, the polymer produced marked regression in CD20+ lymphoma xenografts, whereas the dimer and monomer reagents showed little effect. In addition, we were able to show that the level of apoptosis induced in human lymphoma cell lines was in accordance with the extent of both surface CD20 clustering and caspase-3 activation.
Conclusions: These data suggest that hyper-cross-linkinginduced apoptosis can be simulated by the use of a dextran polymer of Rituximab, which, when used in vivo, can directly kill CD20+ lymphoma cells and improve the clinical efficacy of this important therapeutic for human B-cell lymphomas.
Whereas Rituximab treatment has produced tumor regressions in patients with relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 52% of those patients do not respond (7). To understand the differential responses to Rituximab, efforts have been made to investigate the mechanisms underlying the antitumor activity of Rituximab and the relative contributions of each mechanism. In this regard, several mechanisms have been implicated including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and signaling-induced apoptosis [reviewed by Cartron et al. (1)]. Of these mechanisms, the role of complement-dependent cytotoxicity has been questionable because despite in vitro studies that show that Rituximab is able to bind complement and effectively initiate complement-dependent cytotoxicity in vitro (812) and in vivo (13), no correlation between in vitro complement sensitivity and therapeutic response has been described (14). However, an increase in complement activation products is observed during Rituximab treatment, which may contribute to clinical side effects seen after the first infusion of antibody (15). Hence, it is clear that complement-dependent cytotoxicity plays some role in vivo but its contribution to effective therapy requires further confirmation. Likewise, signaling-induced apoptosis remains controversial because direct binding of Rituximab to CD20+ lymphoma cells fails to induce apoptosis to any significant extent (16). To evoke this mechanism, Rituximab must be hyper-cross-linked either by the binding of goat anti-human/mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) or Fc
receptorbearing cells, or by immobilization on plastic in vitro (1619). Hyper-cross-linking of Rituximab redistributes CD20 into Triton Xinsoluble cell membrane signaling-processing centers (20, 21), followed by lipid raft clustering and transactivation of Src-family tyrosine kinases such as Lyn, Fyn, and Lyc, which further lead to apoptosis of the lymphoma cells (19, 2224). Only antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, specifically Fc:Fc receptor interaction, is now regarded as a predominant effector mechanism of Rituximab (25, 26). Fc
receptors on effector cells seem to be responsible for the in vivo activity of anti-CD20 antibodies in mice as evidenced by the use of knockout mouse models in which it has been shown that Fc:Fc receptor interaction is required for the depletion of circulating and extravasated B lymphocytes (25). Current clinical studies are focusing on a dimorphism of the FCGR3A gene that encodes Fc
receptor IIIa with either a phenylalanine or a valine at residue 158 which specifically reacts with the lower hinge region of IgG1 with different affinities (phenylalanine > valine; refs. 2729). It is observed that homozygous FCGR3A-158V patients have a greater probability of experiencing clinical responses, supporting the critical function of the Fc:Fc receptor interaction (27, 29). For antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity to be effective, it is assumed that Fc receptorbearing cells must enter the tumor microenvironment to come in direct contact with its target. If so, then Fc receptorbearing cells may function as mediators of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and hyper-cross-linkinginduced apoptosis to destroy the tumor. A lack of tumor-associated effector cells may therefore be responsible for Rituximab failure if these mechanisms are critical in patients. If this is the case, the availability of a Rituximab-like reagent to induce apoptosis directly on binding to the surface of CD20+ lymphoma cells would provide a more potent reagent for clinical use.
Recognizing that hyper-cross-linking in vivo is impractical, Ghetie et al. (30) reported that tetravalent homodimers of Rituximab could induce higher apoptosis rates in human malignant lymphoma cell lines compared with monomer preparations obtained from the pharmacy. In their studies, they were able to produce apoptosis rates comparable to those obtained by goat anti-mouse hyper-cross-linking and, when tested in combination with chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin, homodimer preparations produced significantly better tumor cell killing. These promising results suggested that an increased valency of Rituximab could initiate apoptosis in the absence of Fc-receptorbearing cells and may be a method of improving the clinical efficacy of Rituximab therapy. Although in vivo data were lacking, this report stimulated the current study in which we tested a new formulation of Rituximab that consisted of a high valency reagent produced by the conjugation of Rituximab to a dextran polymer. When tested both in vitro and in vivo, this new polymer formulation was found to be a more potent inducer of apoptosis than monomer or dimer preparations. Because of its soluble characteristics, Rituximab polymer is a clinically relevant reagent and has shown good tumor targeting and therapeutic potential in CD20+ Raji xenografts. It is our belief that this newly formulated Rituximab may provide a significant improvement in anti-CD20 therapy, especially in patients with low-affinity Fc
receptor allotypes.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell lines
Raji, B35M, Ramos, Chevallier, and DG-75 cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Farage and Granda 519 cell lines were purchased from Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH (German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany). The SU-DHL-4, SU-DHL-6, SU-DHL-10, and SU-DHL-16 cell lines were established in our laboratory (32). All cell lines were grown in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, San Diego, CA) supplemented with 10% characterized FCS (Hyclone, Logan, UT), 1% glutamine, and penicillin (100 units/mL) and streptomycin (100 µg/mL; Gemini Bio-Products, Woodland, CA), and cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C as stationary suspension cultures.
Conjugation of antibodies to Dynabeads
Rituximab was coated on Dynabeads M-280 Tosylactivated (Dynal Biotech, Inc., Brown Deer, WI) according to the protocol of the manufacturer to study the hyper-cross-linking effect of Rituximab on Raji cells. Briefly, 7 x 108 Dynabeads were washed twice with PBS and incubated with continuous rotation with 200 µg of Rituximab or isotype control antibody in 500 µL at 30°C for 18 to 20 hours. Dynabeads were subsequently pelleted using the magnetic bead attractor (Dynal Biotech), and the unconjugated antibody in the supernatant was quantified by measuring absorbance at 280 nm with a UV spectrophotometer (Ultraspec 2000, Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ). The total amount of antibody conjugated to the Dynabeads was calculated by the equation (total antibody unconjugated antibody = conjugated antibody on the beads). Dynabeads coated with antibodies were washed twice with PBS and 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA), and free tosyl groups were then treated with blocking solution [0.2 mol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), 0.1% BSA] at 37°C for 3 to 4 hours using end-to-end rotation, washed twice with PBS (0.1% BSA, 1% Tween 20), followed by another two washes with PBS (0.1% BSA). Finally, Dynabeads conjugated with antibodies were resuspended in PBS and stored at 4°C.
Generation of dextran-Rituximab polymer
One-hundred-milligram dextran (average MW 6,000; Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs, Switzerland) and 120 mg sodium periodate (Sigma, St Louis, MO) were dissolved in 5 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution and incubated for 18 hours in the dark at room temperature. The mixture was passed through a preequilibrated PD-10 column (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ), eluted in 0.9% NaCl, and stored at 4°C in the dark. Two milliliters of Rituximab (10 mg/mL) were passed through a preequilibrated PD-10 column and eluted with 0.1 mol/L sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 8.1; Sigma). The eluted Rituximab was diluted to 5 mg/mL with 0.1 mol/L sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 8.1), and mixed with 480 µg oxidized dextran at a molar ratio of 1:2.4 (Rituximab/oxidized dextran). After continuous shaking for 6 hours in the dark, the reaction was reduced with 5 mg sodium borohydride (Sigma) for 1 hour followed by dialysis in PBS. The dialysate was then passed through a 0.22 µm nonpyrogenic syringe filter (Costar, Corning, NY), and a Pharmacia AKTA System (fast protein liquid chromatography; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) was used to fractionate the dextran Rituximab mixture through a preequilibrated Superose 6 column in PBS at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The polymer had a retention time of
16 minutes. The polymer fraction was further concentrated using Centricon YM-100 (Millipore, Billerica, MA), sterilized by 0.22 µm filtration, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and agarose electrophoresis. Proteins were analyzed under nonreducing conditions by SDS-PAGE on a 4% stacking, 5% separating gel and a 2% agarose gel. Protein bands were visualized by Coomassie blue staining.
Generation of Rituximab homodimer
Two heterobifunctional cross-linkers, N-succinimidyl S-acethylthio-acetate (SATA; Pierce, Rockford, IL) and succinimidyl 4-(maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC; Pierce), were used to generate homodimers of Rituximab with modifications (30, 33).
Step 1: Derivatization with succinimidyl 4-(maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate. Five milligrams of Rituximab at a concentration of 5 mg/mL in 0.05 mol/L phosphate buffer containing 3 mmol/L Na2EDTA (PBE; pH 7.5) and 2.5 µL of SMCC (9.3 mg/mL DMSO) were incubated with continuous rotation at room temperature for 1 hour using a SMCC/Rituximab molar ratio of 4.5. Conjugated protein was purified by chromatography on a PD-10 column in PBE buffer.
Step 2: Derivatization with N-succinimidyl S-acethylthio-acetate. Five milligrams of Rituximab (5 mg/mL PBE) were mixed with 2.5 µL of SATA (5.8 mg/mL DMSO) and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour using a SATA/Rituximab molar ratio of 4.0. The excess SATA was then removed by chromatography on a PD-10 column and the purified protein was deacetylated with 5 mg of hydroxylamine-HCl (Sigma) for 5 minutes at room temperature. Excess hydroxylamine-HCl was removed by chromatography on a PD-10 column.
Step 3: Reaction of SMCC- and SATA-derived rituximab. SMCC- and SATA-derived proteins were mixed together and incubated with continuous rotation at room temperature for 1 to 2 hours. The preparation was dialyzed overnight in PBS at 4°C, sterilized by filtration through a 0.22 µm nonpyrogenic filter (Costar), and further fractionated on a Superose 6 Column using the Pharmacia AKTA described above at flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The dimer had a retention time of
29 minutes. The protein fractions purified by fast protein liquid chromatography were further concentrated using Centricon YM-100, filter sterilized, and analyzed by SDS/PAGE as described above.
In vitro Studies
Serum stability. In vitro serum stability was evaluated using an immunoblotting assay. Briefly, Rituximab polymer was incubated for up to 10 days in goat serum at 37°C. At different times after incubation, samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. A horseradish peroxidaseconjugated polyclonal goat anti-human IgG (Fc specific) was used to detect the human Fc portion of Rituximab.
CD20 expression determination. CD20 expression was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis using anti-CD20 antibody labeled with phycoerythrin as previously described (11).
Rituximab avidity constant determination. Rituximab monomer, dimer, and polymer were radiolabeled with radioiodine using a modified chloramine-T method developed in our laboratory (34). To determine the avidity constant of each Rituximab preparation, a fixed cell RIA was done using the method of Frankel and Gerhard (35) as previously described. The avidity constant Ka was calculated by the equation K = (slope/n), where n is the valence of the antibody (n = 2 for the monomer; n = 4 for the dimer; n = 10 for the polymer).
Apoptosis induction and detection. (a) Annexin V/propidium iodide staining. Two micrograms of Rituximab monomer, dimer, and polymer, and Rituximab-conjugated Dynabeads (equivalent to 2 µg) were added to 5 x 104 Raji cells in 200 µL media and incubated for 18 hours in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. For hyper-cross-linking, 5 x 104 Raji cells in 200 µL media were incubated with 2 µg of Rituximab for 1 hour at 37°C. The cells were then washed twice with PBS (1% BSA) and then incubated with 5 µg of goat anti-human antibody (Caltag) for 18 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The percentage of apoptosis induced by each antibody preparation was then determined by the Annexin V/propidium iodide staining assay, which directly detects phosphotidylserine exposure on apoptotic cells and the loss of the cellular membrane integrity. Annexin V and propidium iodide stainings were done using the RAPID protocol provided by the manufacturer (Oncogene Research Product, Boston, MA).
(b) Terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferasemediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Induction of DNA strand breaks by each antibody preparation was determined by the TUNEL assay using an APO-DIRECT Kit (Phoenix Flow Systems, San Diego, CA) following the protocol of the manufacturer. For these studies, 5 x 105 Raji cells were incubated with each antibody preparations (20 µg) in 1.5 mL for 18 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. For the hyper-cross-linking studies, 5 x 105 Raji cells were incubated with 20 µg of Rituximab in 1.5 mL for 1 hour at 37°C. Cells were then washed twice with PBS and further incubated with 50 µg of goat anti-human antibody (Caltag) in 1.5 mL for 18 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells were then washed with PBS, fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde at room temperature, and permeabilized in 70% ethanol for storage overnight at 20°C.
Caspase-3 activity assays. Two micrograms of Rituximab monomer, dimer, and polymer, and Rituximab- and isotype control antibodyconjugated Dynabeads were incubated with 5 x 104 Raji cells. After 5 and 24 hours, the cells were washed with PBS, resuspended in 40 µL of the fluorogenic protease substrate Phiphilux (OncoImmunin, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), and incubated in a 30°C water bath for 40 minutes. Lastly, the cells were resuspended in media provided by the manufacturer and immediately analyzed by flow cytometry.
Immunofluorescence microscopy. The pattern of antigen cross-linking on the surfaces of cells treated with different antibody preparations was observed by immunofluorescence microscopy. For these studies, 5 x 105 Raji cells were treated with 20 µg of each antibody preparations at 37°C, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA), diluted in PBS at room temperature, followed by two washes with PBS (1% BSA). Fixed cells were then incubated with 25 µg of goat anti-mouse antibody F(ab')2 (ICN-Cappel) at 4°C for 30 minutes and subsequently washed twice with PBS (1% BSA). For the hyper-cross-linking studies by a secondary goat-anti-mouse IgG F(ab')2, 5 x 105 Raji cells were treated with 20 µg of Rituximab for 1 hour at 37°C. The cells were washed with PBS twice and incubated with 25 µg of goat anti-mouse antibody F(ab')2 for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then washed twice and fixed as above. Cytospin preparations were mounted in Vectorshield with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for observation under a phase-contrast fluorescence microscope using a 50x water immersion lens.
In vivo studies
Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies. Six-week-old female athymic nude mice were used to determine the pharmacokinetic clearance of the radiolabeled Rituximab monomer, dimer, and polymer preparations as previously described (34, 36). Significance levels (P values) were determined using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Tissue biodistribution studies were done in Raji tumorbearing nude mice to examine the targeting ability of the Rituximab monomer, dimer, and polymer. Six-week-old female athymic nude mice (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) were irradiated with 350 rad from a cesium source to suppress innate natural killer activity, and 3 days later were injected s.c. with a 0.2 mL inoculum containing 5 x 106 Raji lymphoma cells and 105 human fetal fibroblast feeder cells in the left flank using a University Animal Care Committeeapproved protocol. The human fetal fibroblast feeder cells established in our laboratory provide growth factors that promote a high tumor take rate (>90%). Tumors were grown for 10 to 15 days until they reached 0.5 cm in diameter. In each group (n = 5), individual mice were injected i.v. with a 0.1 mL inoculum containing 30 to 40 µCi of 125I-labeled antibody preparations. Mice were then sacrificed by sodium pentobarbital overdose at 72 hours postinjection, and tissues were removed, weighed, and measured in a
counter. For each mouse, data were expressed as percentage injected dose per gram (% ID/g) and as tumor/organ ratio (cpm per gram tumor/cpm per gram organ). Significance levels were determined using a Wilcoxon's rank-sum test.
Immunotherapy studies. Six-week-old female athymic nude mice were heterotransplanted with Raji lymphoma cells as described above. When tumors reached 0.5 cm in diameter, groups of mice (n = 5) were injected i.v. with 0.1 mL inoculum containing 25 µg of the Rituximab monomer, dimer, or polymer. All groups were treated every other day five times and tumor volumes were monitored thrice a week by caliper measurement in three dimensions using the formula length x width x height. All data were presented as means of tumor volume (cm3) and significance levels were determined using the Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. All mice were sacrificed by sodium pentobarbital overdose.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
16 minutes whereas the dimer revealed a retention time of
29 minutes by fast protein liquid chromatography. The purity of each preparation was >99%. The molecular weights of the Rituximab polymer and dimer were shown by nonreducing SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2A). Under these conditions, the molecular weight of the polymer was found to be beyond the SDS-PAGE measurement capabilities due to the fact that the polymer did not enter the gel. To solve this problem, a 2% agarose gel was used along with murine immunoglobulin M, which has a known molecular weight of 970 kDa (Fig. 2A). By this method, one band was resolved for the Rituximab polymer, which was slightly higher than that of immunoglobulin M, corresponding to the molecular weight of
5 immunoglobulin molecules. Additional studies are under way to determine the degree of heterogeneity of the polymer.
|
Avidity studies. Avidity binding studies were conducted in which 125I-labeled Rituximab preparations were incubated with Raji lymphoma cells and the bound radioactivity was used to calculate the avidity constant (Ka) by Scatchard analysis. Using this method, the Rituximab polymer was found to have an avidity constant of 3.16 x 108 (mol/L)1, whereas the monomer and dimer had avidity constants of 3.6 x 108 and 2.09 x 108 (mol/L)1, respectively. These studies show that the Rituximab polymer and dimer have similar binding avidities to antigen as Rituximab monomer, facilitating subsequent direct comparisons in vitro and in vivo.
Induction of apoptosis by Rituximab dimer and polymer. Apoptosis assays were used to analyze the ability of the Rituximab polymer and dimer to induce apoptosis. TUNEL assays showed that the Rituximab polymer induced 57.8% apoptosis whereas the dimer produced only 2.99% (Fig. 2C). To investigate whether these results would be similar with other human malignant lymphoma cell lines, 12 different cell lines were studied including 10 CD20+ and 2 CD20 (Table 1). In the CD20+ cell lines, apoptosis was significantly increased in the cells treated with Rituximab polymer compared with those treated with the dimer or monomer. However, not all CD20+ cells treated with Rituximab polymer showed significant apoptosis. It is assumed that some of these lymphoma cell lines may have different intracellular pathways associated with CD20 ligation. As expected, no significant apoptosis was detected in any of the CD20 cell lines treated with the different Rituximab preparations.
|
Immunofluorescence microscopy studies. To investigate further whether there is any correlation between surface hyper-cross-linking of CD20 and apoptosis, immunofluorescence staining was done to study the Rituximab and CD20 antigen distribution on the cell surface. As shown in Fig. 3, Rituximab monomer and dimer treatments produced a ring pattern of immunofluorescence, indicating that CD20 is evenly distributed on the surface of the lymphoma cells. By contrast, cells treated with Rituximab polymer or Rituximab + goat anti-mouse antibody were found to have a more segregated polar staining pattern consistent with the movement and fixation of CD20 into lipid rafts.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5 immunoglobulins per dextran molecule. To show its potency in vitro and in vivo, the polymer preparation was compared with Rituximab monomer and with a previously published dimer (30), which showed some improved activity when tested in apoptosis assays. Our results clearly showed that the polymer is able to induce apoptosis of CD20+ human lymphoma cell lines directly on binding, distinguishing it from both the monomer and dimer preparations using the TUNEL assay (Rituximab, 3%; dimer, 3%; polymer, 58%; see Figs. 1B and 2B). These findings were obtained despite the fact that all three preparations had essentially equal avidity constants against CD20 antigen and had similar pharmacokinetic properties and biodistribution characteristics in tumor-bearing nude mice. In addition, the Rituximab polymer was found to be much more effective in vivo against implanted Raji lymphomas using dosages in which the monomer and dimer preparations had little effect. In contrast to the results of Ghetie et al. (30), the dimer preparation produced in our laboratory (99% pure) induced no noticeable increase in apoptosis in vitro. This may have been due to the presence of polymers contaminating their dimer preparations, which were reported to be only 80% pure. In this report, various methods of CD20 hyper-cross-linkinginduced apoptosis were quantified by both Annexin V and TUNEL assays. Of note, Rituximab-coated Dynabeads induced maximum levels of apoptosis in Raji cells in which >90% of cells were shown to become apoptotic. Several factors may have contributed to the induction of such a high apoptosis percentage. First, Rituximab was conjugated to Dynabeads by peptide bonding which produced a more rigid presentation of antibody to the lymphoma cells than that obtained with secondary antibodies or plastic substrata. Second, the Dynabeads have a rounded surface, allowing multiple contact points to facilitate maximum interaction with target, and are small enough to have several beads attach to each target cell. Under the microscope, the Rituximab-coated Dynabeads often produced cell aggregation due to their attachment to multiple lymphoma cells. Finally, a high concentration of antibody was attached to the beads providing an optimal binding surface for cross-linking. By contrast, Rituximab immobilized to a plastic surface or hyper-cross-linked with secondary antibody either has a limited interactive interface or is not as efficient in fixing CD20 in hydrophobic regions once the CD20 has migrated into the lipid rafts, the latter being a requirement for optimal induction of apoptosis according to data presented by Deans et al. (38), but not according to the data of Chan et al. (39). Because of these results, we hypothesize that the Dynabead presentation is more likely to be that obtained with Fc receptorbearing cells in vivo. Regardless, antibody-coated Dynabeads may represent a new and simple method for identifying antibodies and antigens in which apoptosis induction via Fc receptorbearing cell presentation is an important mechanism of action.
To further investigate whether there is any correlation between surface hyper-cross-linking of CD20 and apoptosis, immunofluorescence staining was done to study antibody and antigen distribution on the cell surface. As shown in Fig. 3, treatment with Rituximab monomer and dimer produced a ring pattern of staining, indicating that these reagents reacted with antigen that was evenly distributed on the surface of the cell. By contrast, those cells treated with Rituximab polymer or hyper-cross-linked with secondary antibody showed a more segregated polar staining pattern, a finding which correlated with higher apoptosis induction and the movement of antigen into lipid rafts (38). From these experiments, we concluded that CD20 antigen clustering is associated with superior induction of apoptosis and that immunofluorescence microscopy is a good method for observing the effects of various antibody preparations on the induction of apoptosis.
As described above, many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the effectiveness of Rituximab treatment both in animal models and man. The notion that antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity plays a major role in vivo is the current prevailing hypothesis and several articles have already addressed the importance of antibody presentation via Fc receptors (25, 26, 29). In mouse models, Fc
receptor II has an inhibitory role in the therapeutic effect of Rituximab (26), but some studies produced contradictory results (40). Specifically, mouse fibroblast Ltk cells that were transfected with Fc
receptor II still facilitated signaling-induced apoptosis (16). In the present study, the fact that the polymer preparation effectively suppressed Raji lymphoma growth in vivo emphasizes the point that apoptosis alone can be a powerful mechanism for treating lymphomas. In support of this concept, clinical studies by Byrd et al. (41) found caspase-3 cleavage in lymphoma cells of patients treated with Rituximab as evidence of the induction of apoptosis after treatment. In this situation, apoptosis was most likely due to presentation of antibody via Fc receptorbearing cells. In our experiments, caspase-3 induction was found to occur with Rituximab-coated Dynabeads and polymer (Fig. 2C). By contrast, Rituximab monomer and dimer treatments produced only basal levels of caspase-3 activity.
In summary, it seems that the induction of apoptosis in lymphoma cells requires proper presentation of anti-CD20 to induce CD20 movement into lipid rafts and subsequent fixation of the antigen in these polar regions of the cell surface. The high valency afforded by the Dynabeads preparation in vitro and the polymer preparation in vivo may facilitate fixation and trapping (hyper-cross-linking) of CD20 on the cell surface, thereby providing a strong signal to initiate apoptosis pathways resulting in the activation of caspase 3. In vitro, amplified apoptosis can be achieved using secondary antibodies, Fc receptorbearing cells, or Rituximab-coated Dynabeads. In vivo, hyper-cross-linking seems to require presentation by Fc receptorbearing cells (25), a mechanism which apparently can be simulated by the polymer preparation. Not requiring the presence of effector cells for the induction of apoptosis, the polymer preparation may be especially useful in lymphoma patients who have the low Fc receptor phenotype and who are nonresponsive to Rituximab monotherapy (27). Finally, because Rituximab-coated Dynabeads treatment produced >90% apoptosis, it is conceivable that additional formulation work on Rituximab polymers can achieve higher levels, rendering this new form of treatment optimally effective above the current 58% apoptosis rate (in vitro) presently obtained.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 3/11/05; revised 5/ 4/05; accepted 5/20/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 and PLC phospholipase C-
2. J Immunol 1993;151:4494504.[Abstract]
RIII complex. Nature 2000;406:26773.[CrossRef][Medline]
RIIIa gene. Blood 2002;99:7548.
RIIB expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas does not alter the response to CHOP+Rituximab (R-CHOP). Leukemia 2004;18:203840.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Sharkey, H. Karacay, S. Litwin, E. A. Rossi, W. J. McBride, C.-H. Chang, and D. M. Goldenberg Improved Therapeutic Results by Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma with a New Recombinant, Trivalent, Anti-CD20, Bispecific Antibody Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 68(13): 5282 - 5290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Li, S. Shi, W. Qian, L. Zhao, D. Zhang, S. Hou, L. Zheng, J. Dai, J. Zhao, H. Wang, et al. Development of Novel Tetravalent Anti-CD20 Antibodies with Potent Antitumor Activity Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2400 - 2408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bremer, B. ten Cate, D. F. Samplonius, N. Mueller, H. Wajant, A. J. Stel, M. Chamuleau, A. A. van de Loosdrecht, J. Stieglmaier, G. H. Fey, et al. Superior Activity of Fusion Protein scFvRit:sFasL over Cotreatment with Rituximab and Fas Agonists Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 68(2): 597 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-Y. Brard, H. Karacay, R. Stein, R. M. Sharkey, M. J. Mattes, C.-H. Chang, E. A. Rossi, W. J. McBride, and D. M. Goldenberg A Divalent Hapten-Peptide Induces Apoptosis in Human Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Cell Lines Targeted by Anti-CD20 x Anti-Hapten Bispecific Antibodies Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5564s - 5571s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Carlotti, G. A. Palumbo, E. Oldani, D. Tibullo, S. Salmoiraghi, A. Rossi, J. Golay, A. Pulsoni, R. Foa, and A. Rambaldi Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RIIA polymorphisms do not predict clinical outcome of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with sequential CHOP and rituximab Haematologica, August 1, 2007; 92(8): 1127 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. N.C. Chiu, L. A. Edwards, A. I. Kapanen, M. M. Malinen, W. H. Dragowska, C. Warburton, G. G. Chikh, K. Y.Y. Fang, S. Tan, J. Sy, et al. Modulation of cancer cell survival pathways using multivalent liposomal therapeutic antibody constructs Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2007; 6(3): 844 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Stein, Z. Qu, S. Chen, D. Solis, H. J. Hansen, and D. M. Goldenberg Characterization of a humanized IgG4 anti-HLA-DR monoclonal antibody that lacks effector cell functions but retains direct antilymphoma activity and increases the potency of rituximab Blood, October 15, 2006; 108(8): 2736 - 2744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Sharkey and D. M. Goldenberg Targeted Therapy of Cancer: New Prospects for Antibodies and Immunoconjugates CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2006; 56(4): 226 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |