Clinical Cancer Research  Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, K.
Right arrow Articles by Shuin, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, K.
Right arrow Articles by Shuin, T.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 11, 6669-6677, September 15, 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research


Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Effect of Combination Therapy with a Novel Bisphosphonate, Minodronate (YM529), and Docetaxel on a Model of Bone Metastasis by Human Transitional Cell Carcinoma

Keiji Inoue1, Takashi Karashima1, Satoshi Fukata1, Asuka Nomura1, Chiaki Kawada1, Atsushi Kurabayashi2, Mutsuo Furihata2, Yuji Ohtsuki2 and Taro Shuin1

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Urology and 2 Pathology II, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan

Requests for reprints: Keiji Inoue, Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Kohasu, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan. Phone: 81-88-880-2402; Fax: 81-88-880-2404; E-mail: keiji{at}med.kochi-u.ac.jp.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urinary tract is a chemosensitive tumor. Most deaths from TCC of the urinary tract are caused by metastasis, which is resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Frequent sites of metastases from TCC of the urinary tract are regional lymph nodes, liver, lung, and bone. Of these distant metastases, bone metastasis is consistently resistant to cisplatin-based conventional chemotherapy. Therefore, in this study, we investigated whether or not a newly developed minodronate, YM529, could prevent osteolytic bone metastasis of human TCC and also enhance the effect of docetaxel in a bone tumor model of athymic nude mice.

Experimental Design: In the present study, we evaluated the effect of in vitro treatment with minodronate and/or docetaxel on the proliferation by cell count, the induction of apoptosis by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, and the biological activity of osteoclast by pit formation assay in human bladder cancer cell line, UMUC-14, and mouse osteoclast cells. In vivo, we examined the effect of minodronate in a bone tumor model of athymic nude mice, in which the percutaneous intraosseal injection in the tibia of UMUC-14, leads to osteolytic bone tumor, as a bone metastasis model. To examine whether or not minodronate could inhibit tumorigenicity and enhance the effect of the chemotherapeutic agent, docetaxel, we gave minodronate i.p. and/or docetaxel i.p. to nude mice 3 days after an intraosseal tumor implantation. Moreover, proliferation and the induction of apoptosis of cancer cells and osteoclasts in bone tumors were determined by immunohistochemistry and the TUNEL assay.

Results: In vitro: In vitro treatment with docetaxel inhibited proliferation and resorption pit-forming activity and induced apoptosis of mouse osteoclast cells and UMUC-14 cells. In vitro treatment with minodronate inhibited proliferation and activity and induced apoptosis of mouse osteoclast cells but not UMUC-14 cells. The treatment with minodronate enhanced the inhibition of proliferation and activity by docetaxel in osteoclasts. In vivo: In vivo combination therapy with docetaxel and minodronate significantly reduced the tumor incidence compared with the control (P < 0.05) and also growth of intraossal TCC in athymic nude mice compared with the control (P < 0.001), single therapy with docetaxel (P < 0.01), and minodronate (P < 0.05). Drug-induced body weight loss was not significantly different in any treatment group. Therapy with minodronate significantly enhanced inhibition of proliferation by docetaxel in osteoclasts of bone tumors compared with the control (P < 0.01), single therapy with docetaxel (P < 0.01), and minodronate (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: These studies indicate that combination therapy with minodronate and docetaxel may be beneficial in patients with bone metastasis of human TCC in the urinary tract.


Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urinary tract, renal pelvis, ureter, and urinary bladder is the second most common urological malignancy and has a poor prognosis. This malignancy is diagnosed in ~60,000 patients and results in 15,000 deaths annually in the United States (1). Radical operation is the standard treatment for operable invasive TCC urinary tract, whereas a combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) chemotherapy offers the only viable therapeutic option for locally advanced cancer, initial and recurrent metastases, and prevention of them. Although TCC of the urinary tract is a chemosensitive tumor, most deaths from TCC of the urinary tract are caused by metastasis, which is resistant to conventional chemotherapy (2, 3). It was previously reported that the most frequent sites of metastases were regional lymph nodes (90%), liver (47%), lung (45%), and bone (32%) in autopsies of 367 patients with T2 to T4 bladder cancer (4). Of these distant metastases, bone metastasis is consistently resistant to cisplatin-based conventional chemotherapy (5).

Similar to bone metastasis of breast cancer, and multiple myeloma, bone metastasis due to TCC in the urinary tract is osteolytic. Osteolytic bone metastasis is not only a critical problem in treatment but also the main cause of a decrease in the quality of life of patients with bone metastases. Therefore, the development of novel therapeutic strategies is mandatory if we are to improve the outcome and the quality of life of patients with osteolytic bone metastases of TCC in the urinary tract.

It is well known that bisphosphonate, a specific inhibitor of osteoclastic bone resorption, has been widely used as a beneficial agent in the treatment of osteolytic bone metastases from several cancers (68). Minodronate (YM529, [1-hydroxy-2-(imidazo [1,2] pyridin-3-yl) ethylidene]-bisphosphonic acid monohydrate) is a newly developed third-generation bisphosphonate that has a more potent inhibitory activity toward mouse osteoclastic bone resorption in vitro and in vivo than previously developed bisphosphonates (9), such as pamidronate (1012), alendronate (13), and ibandronate (14), which are second-generation bisphosphonates, and incadronate (12, 15), risedronate (16), and zoledronate, (17), which are third-generation bisphosphonates.

The taxanes, paclitaxel (Taxol) and docetaxel, are effective chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of a number of major solid tumors including lung (18), colon (18), pancreatic (18), prostate (19), and bladder (20, 21) cancers. Taxanes bind to the ß-subunit of tubulin and interfere with microtubular polymerization by promoting abnormal assembly of microtubules and inhibiting their subsequent disassembly in the mitotic spindle, resulting in arrest of the G2-M phase of the cell cycle, leading to programmed cell death (22, 23). Recently, it has been reported that docetaxel causes apoptosis by inducing phosphorylation of an apoptosis suppressing oncogene, bcl-2, in prostate (19) and bladder (20, 21) cancers. Moreover, docetaxel was described as the most potent inducer of bcl-2 phosphorylation; docetaxel was >100 times more potent in this effect than paclitaxel (21).

Therefore, we hypothesized that taxane cytotoxicity would be complimentary to the antitumor effect by minodronate and provide additive or synergistc therapeutic effects on tumorigenicity in bone metastasis model.

In the present study described herein, the combination therapy with minodronate (YM529) and docetaxel markedly inhibited tumorigenicity in nonestablished bone tumor models of human TCC compared with therapy with each agent alone. This effect is mediated, at least in part, by the complementary cytotoxicities of cancer cells and osteoclasts.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell lines and culture conditions. The highly metastatic human bladder cancer cell line UMUC-14 (24) was grown as a monolayer in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Mouse osteoclast cells were grown as a monolayer in 25 mL of modified EMEM supplemented with 10 ng/mL of monocyte macrophage/colony-stimulating factor and 10 ng/mL of RANKL from the osteoclast V-2 kit (Mouse; Hokudo, Sapporo Japan).

Reagents. Minodronate (YM529) was provided by Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Stock solutions of minodronate were prepared in absolute NaOH and suspended in saline. Docetaxel was a kind gift of Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).

In vitro cell growth inhibition. The in vitro dose-dependent antiproliferative effect of minodronate and/or docetaxel was evaluated after incubating 5 x 104 UMUC-14 and 2 x 104 osteoclasts for 24 hours in serum-free medium, then exchanging the medium for 10% FBS supplemented with MEM containing an increasing concentration of minodronate (0-10 µg/mL) and/or docetaxel (0-10 µg/mL). Growth inhibition was determined after 48 hours by a cell count using the COULTER Z1 (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and expressed as the ratio of the number of viable cells in each group treated with minodronate and/or docetaxel to the number in the control group treated with PBS.

In vitro apoptosis induction. The in vitro induction of apoptosis of 1 x 105 UMUC-14 cells and 2 x 104 osteoclasts by minodronate and/or docetaxel was evaluated after incubating for 24 hours in serum-free medium, then exchanging the medium for 10% FBS supplemented with MEM containing the IC50 concentration of minodronate and/or docetaxel. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and incubated at 4°C for 24 hours in 10 x bovine serum supplemented with fresh MEM. Quantification of DNA fragmentation was accomplished using the Apoptosis in situ Detection Kit (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan). The results were expressed as an average percentage of five highest areas in total of 1,000 cells identified within a single 200 x per field.

Biological activity of osteoclasts. The pit formation assay was done using the osteoclast V-2 kit (Mouse, Hokudo). Ivory slices were placed in 96-well plates. Mouse osteoclast progenitor cells (4 x 104 cells per well) were seeded to each well with {alpha}MEM containing monocyte macrophage/colony-stimulating factor (10 ng/mL) and receptor activator of the necrosis factor {kappa}B ligand (RANKL, 10 ng/mL) using the osteoclast V-2 kit (Mouse, Hokudo). After incubation for 9 days, fresh medium containing an increasing concentration of minodronate (0-10 µg/mL) and/or docetaxel (0-10 µg/mL) was added. The cells were continuously cultured for 3 days. The ivory slices were soaked in NH4OH (1 mol/L) solution to remove attached cells. The resorption pit on the ivory slices was observed under a scanning electronic microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan; S-2380N). The resorption pit area derived by the resorption pit assay was expressed as the average percentage of the three highest resorption pit areas compared with control as 100 measured by scanning electronic microscope and analyzed with a computer analysis system.

Animals. Male athymic BALB/cA Jc1-nu nude mice were obtained from Clea Japan, Inc. (Osaka, Japan). The mice were maintained in a laminar-airflow cabinet under pathogen-free conditions and used at 6 to 8 weeks of age. All animal experimental protocols were followed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the U.S. NIH (Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996) and the guidelines of our university.

Ectopic implantation. Cultured UMUC-14 cells (60-70% confluent) were prepared as previously described (25). Mice were anesthetized with Nembutal. For ectopic implantation, a percutaneous intraosseal injection was made by drilling a 27-gauge needle into the tibia immediately proximal to the tuberositas tibia. After penetration of the cortical bone, the needle was inserted into the shaft of the tibia and 20 µL of the cell suspension (5 x 105 per 20 µL) was deposited in the bone cortex. To prevent leakage of cells into the surrounding muscles, a cotton swab was held for 1 minute over the site of injection. The animals tolerated the surgical procedure well, and no anesthesia-related deaths occurred.

In vivo therapy of human transitional cell carcinoma growing in the tibia of athymic nude mice. Mice were ectopically implanted with viable UMUC-14 cells (5 x 105 per 20 µL) into the tibia and randomly separated into four groups. Therapy commenced 3 days after tumor implantation. Groups of mice were given i.p. with control (PBS), docetaxel (10 mg/kg), or minodronate (0.3 mg/kg), once a week for 4 weeks and harvested 38 days after the implantation. Clinically, docetaxel and also minodronate is used once a week in a lot of regimen of chemotherapy. We determined the schedule according to the clinical regimen. The optimum dose of these agents was determined according to previous report (2628).

Tissue processing. Mice were killed by cervical dislocation and soft X-ray photographs of the bone tumor were taken to evaluate the antitumoral effects. The estimated volume of bone tumors was calculated by three axes (X, Y, and Z) using the formula of {pi}/6XYZ. The bone tumor were necropsied and fixed in 20% formalin for 24 hours. The bone specimens were decalcified in 10% EDTA solution for 1 week. After decalcification, the specimens were dehydrated with graded ethanols, embedded paraffin, and 4-µm sections were obtained and adhered to ProveOn Plus Microscope Slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for immunohistochemistry, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining. Sections (4 µm thick) were also stained with H&E for routine histologic examination.

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated nick-end labeling assay. For the TUNEL assay, tissue sections (5 µm thick) of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in graded alcohol, and transferred to PBS. The slides were rinsed twice with distilled water with BRIJ and treated with a 1:500 proteinase K solution (20 µg/mL) for 15 minutes, and endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide in PBS for 12 minutes. The samples were washed thrice with distilled water with BRIJ and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase buffer. Excess terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase buffer was drained, and the samples were incubated for 18 hours at 4°C with terminal transferase and biotin-16-dUTP. The samples were then rinsed four times with TB buffer and incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C with a 1:400 dilution of peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin. The slides were rinsed with PBS and incubated for 5 minutes with diaminobenzidine (Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad, CA). The sections were then washed thrice with PBS, counterstained with Gill's hematoxylin (Biogenex Laboratories, San Ramon, CA), and again washed thrice with PBS. The slides were mounted with a Universal Mount (Invitrogen).

Immunohistochemistry. For the immunohistochemical analysis, tissue sections (5 µm thick) of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in graded alcohol, and transferred to PBS. Endogenous peroxidases were blocked by incubation in 3% hydrogen peroxide in PBS for 12 minutes. The samples were washed thrice with PBS and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature with a protein-blocking solution containing 5% normal horse serum and 1% normal goat serum in PBS (pH 7.5). Excess blocking solution was drained, and the samples were incubated for 18 hours at 4°C with the appropriate dilution (1:100) of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) with monoclonal mouse anti-PCNA Ab (DakoCytomation Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). The samples were then rinsed four times with PBS and incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature with the appropriate dilution of the secondary antibody, peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (H+L, DakoCytomation). The slides were rinsed with PBS and incubated for 5 minutes with diaminobenzidine (Invitrogen). The sections were then washed thrice with PBS, counterstained with Gill's hematoxylin (Biogenex Laboratories), and again washed thrice with PBS. The slides were mounted with Universal Mount (Invitrogen).

Quantification of proliferation and apoptosis in cancer cells. Proliferation and apoptosis of cancer cells were determined by immunohistochemical staining of tissue sections with anti-PCNA antibodies and the TUNEL assay. The tissue was recorded using a cooled CCD Optotronics Tec 470 camera (Optotronics Engineering, Goletha, CA) linked to a computer and digital printer (Sony Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The density of proliferative cells and apoptotic cells was expressed as an average percentage of five highest areas in total of 500 cells identified within a single 200x per field (26).

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining. For the detection of osteoclasts, TRAP staining was done using Sigma Diagnosis Acid Phosphatase Kit (Sigma Diagnosis, St. Louis, MO). The number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts at the tumor-bone interface was counted under a microscope within a single 200x per field.

Quantification of proliferation and apoptosis in osteoclasts. Proliferation and apoptosis of osteoclasts were determined by light microscopy after TRAP staining and the TUNEL assay. The tissue images were recorded using a cooled CCD Optotronics Tec 470 camera (Optotronics Engineering) linked to a computer and digital printer (Sony). TRAP-positive osteoclasts and apoptotic osteoclasts were counted and were expressed as an average percentage of five highest areas in total of 100 cells identified within a single 200x per field (29).

Statistical analysis. The statistical differences in the amount of cell proliferation and apoptosis within the bone tumors were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. The incidence of tumors and estimated tumor volume were statistically analyzed with the {chi}2 test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In vitro growth inhibition of UMUC-14 cells by treatment with minodronate and/or docetaxel. The in vitro dose-dependent antiproliferative effect of minodronate and/or docetaxel was evaluated after incubating 5 x 104 UMUC-14 cells for 24 hours in serum-free medium, then exchanging the medium for 10% FBS supplemented with MEM containing an increasing concentration of minodronate (0-10 µg/mL) and/or docetaxel (0-10 µg/mL). The IC50 of UMUC-14 cells treated with docetaxel was <0.001 µg/mL, whereas the IC50 of UMUC-14 cells treated with minodronate was >1 µg/mL. Although UMUC-14 cell proliferation was markedly inhibited by in vitro treatment with docetaxel in a dose-dependent manner, there was no significant effect of combination treatment with minodronate on the proliferation of UMUC-14 cells (Fig. 1A).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A, in vitro growth inhibition of UMUC-14 cells by the treatment of minodronate (YM529) and/or docetaxel. The in vitro dose-dependent antiproliferative effect of minodronate and/or docetaxel was evaluated after incubating 5 x 104 UMUC-14 cells for 24 hours in serum-free medium and exchanging the medium for 10% FBS supplemented with MEM containing an increasing concentration of minodronate (0-10 µg/mL) and/or docetaxel (0-10 µg/mL). Proliferation of UMUC-14 was markedly inhibited by in vitro treatment with docetaxel in a dose-dependent manner. There was no significant effect on the proliferation of UMUC-14 cells by the combination treatment with minodronate. B, in vitro growth inhibition of mouse osteoclasts by the treatment of minodronate (YM529) and/or docetaxel. The in vitro dose-dependent antiproliferative effect of minodronate and/or docetaxel was evaluated after incubating 2 x 104 mouse osteoclasts for 24 hours in serum-free medium and exchanging the medium for 10% FBS supplemented MEM containing an increasing concentration of minodronate (0-10 µg/mL) and/or docetaxel (0-10 µg/ml). In vitro antiproliferation of osteoclasts was synergistically increased by the combination treatment of minodronate and docetaxel compared with the effect of either agent alone.

 
In vitro growth inhibition of mouse osteoclasts by treatment with minodronate and/or docetaxel. The in vitro dose-dependent antiproliferative effect of minodronate and/or docetaxel was evaluated after incubating 2 x 104 mouse osteoclasts for 24 hours in serum-free medium, then exchanging the medium for 10% FBS supplemented MEM containing an increasing concentration of minodronate (0-10 µg/mL) and/or docetaxel (0-10 µg/mL). The IC50 of mouse osteoclasts treated with docetaxel and minodronate was ~0.1 µg/mL. Proliferation of osteoclasts was inhibited by in vitro treatment with docetaxel and minodronate in a dose-dependent manner. In vitro antiproliferation of osteoclasts was synergistically increased by the combination treatment of minodronate and docetaxel compared with the effect of either agent alone (Fig. 1B).

In vitro induction of apoptosis by treatment with minodronate and/or docetaxel of human transitional cell carcinoma UMUC-14 cells and mouse osteoclasts. The in vitro induction of apoptosis by treatment with minodronate and/or docetaxel of UMUC-14 cells and mouse osteoclasts was determined by the TUNEL assay using the Apoptosis in situ Detection Kit. The results were expressed as an average percentage of five highest areas in total of 1,000 cells identified within a single 200x per field.

Docetaxel induced apoptosis in 14.0% (9.8-17.8%) of UMUC-14 cells compared with PBS-treated control (P < 0.01) and single treatment with minodronate (P < 0.01), whereas minodronate did not significantly induce apoptosis of UMUC-14 cells. The combination treatment of docetaxel with minodronate induced apoptosis of UMUC-14 cells in 15.8% (12.3-18.5%) compared with PBS treated control (P < 0.005) and single treatment with minodronate (P < 0.005). There were no additive effects of the combination with minodronate on apoptosis induction in UMUC-14 cells (Fig. 2).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. In vitro induction of apoptosis by the treatment of minodronate (YM529, MINO) and/or docetaxel (TAX) for human transitional cell carcinoma UMUC-14 cells and mouse osteoclasts. The in vitro induction of apoptosis by treatment with minodronate (1 µg/mL) and/or docetaxel (0.01 µg/mL) of UMUC-14 cells and mouse osteoclasts was determined by the TUNEL assay using the Apoptosis in situ Detection Kit. The results were expressed as an average percentage of five highest areas in total of 1,000 cells identified within a single 200x per field. *1, P < 0.01; *2, P < 0.005 against control (CTRL) and single therapy with minodronate; *3 and *4, P < 0.005 against control and single therapy with docetaxel (Mann-Whitney statistical comparison).

 
Minodronate markedly induced apoptosis in 15.8% (10.3-22.8%) of osteoclasts compared with PBS-treated control and single treatment with docetaxel (P < 0.005). Docetaxel induced apoptosis in 6.3% (3.0-10.0%) of osteoclasts, whereas the combination with docetaxel did not enhanced apoptosis induction of osteoclasts by minodronate [15.3% (12.3-17.5%); Fig. 2].

In vitro formation of resorption pits by mouse osteoclasts treated with minodronate and/or docetaxel. To determine the biological activity of mouse osteoclasts, the pit formation assay was done using the mouse osteoclast V-2 kit. The resorption pit on ivory slices was observed under a scanning electronic microscope. The resorption pit area determined by the resorption pit assay was expressed as an average percentage of the three highest resorption pit areas compared with control as 100 measured by scanning electronic microscope and analyzed with a computer analysis system.

In vitro formation of resorption pits by mouse osteoclasts treated with docetaxel or minodronate was significantly inhibited in 73% (58-85%) or 44% (36-56%) compared with PBS-treated control (P < 0.05 or P < 0.05), respectively. Combination treatment of docetaxel with minodronate significantly enhanced the inhibition of resorption pit formation in 38% (23-46%) compared with PBS-treated control and single treatment with docetaxel (P < 0.01). There were additive effects of the combination of docetaxel with minodronate on resorption pit formation by osteoclasts (Fig. 3A-B).



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. A, in vitro formation of resorption pits by mouse osteoclast treated with minodronate (MINO) and/or docetaxel (TAX). The pit formation assay was done using the mouse osteoclast V-2 kit. The resorption pit on ivory slices was observed under scanning electronic microscope. In vitro formation of resorption pits by mouse osteoclast treated with docetaxel or minodronate was inhibited significantly. There were additive effects of the combination of docetaxel with minodronate on resorption pit formation by osteoclasts. The resorption pit (Lacunae) in the representative area of each treated group was shown. a, control (CTRL); b, single therapy with docetaxel; c, single therapy with minodronate; d, combination therapy with minodronate and docetaxel. B, in vitro formation of resorption pits by mouse osteoclast treated with minodronate (YM529) and/or docetaxel. The resorption pit area by resorption pit assay was expressed as an average percentage of three highest areas compared with control as 100 measured by a CCD camera and analyzed with computer image analysis system. *1, P < 0.05 against control; *2, P < 0.01 against control and P < 0.05 single therapy with docetaxel; *3, P < 0.01 against control and single therapy with docetaxel (Mann-Whitney statistical comparison).

 
In vivo therapy with minodronate and/or docetaxel of human transitional cell carcinoma UMUC-14 cells growing in the tibia of athymic nude mice. To determine whether or not the combination therapy with minodronate would be effective on nonestablished bone tumor of human TCC growing within the tibia of athymic nude mice, therapy was commenced 3 days after tumor implantation. Treated mice were closely monitored for any signs of progressive disease and were sacrificed if they became moribund. The results of the therapy are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. The combination therapy with minodronate and/or docetaxel for human transitional cell carcinoma UMUC-14 cells growing in the tibia athymic nude mice

 
The incidence of bone tumor was completely inhibited in seven of nine mice (78%) by the combination of docetaxel with minodronate. In two other mice, bone tumors were detected pathologically, and the tumor volume could not be estimated. In vivo combination therapy with docetaxel and minodronate significantly reduced the tumor growth of nonestablished bone tumor of human TCC in athymic nude mice compared with the controls given PBS [median volume (range), 487.0 cm3 (0-1899.7 cm3); P < 0.001], single therapy with docetaxel [117.7 cm3 (0-502.4 cm3); P < 0.01], and minodronate [63.3 cm3 (0-384.7 cm3); P < 0.05; Fig. 4; Table 1].



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. In vivo therapy with minodronate (YM529) and/or docetaxel for human transitional cell carcinoma UMUC-14 cells growing tibia of athymic nude mice. Mice were implanted with 5 x 105 UMUC-14 cells into the tibia, and treatment with PBS (A), docetaxel (10 mg/kg i.p., B), minodronate (0.3 mg/kg i.p., C), minodronate and docetaxel (D) commend 3 days later and were harvested 38 days after the implantation. Complete inhibition of tumor growth in seven of nine mice (78%) was shown by the combination therapy with minodronate and docetaxel. The combination therapy, especially with minodronate and docetaxel, significantly reduced tumorigenicity compared with control (P < 0.001) and each therapy alone with docetaxel (P < 0.01) and minodronate (P < 0.05). Abbreviations: Radiol., bone tumor was radiologically detected; Pathol., bone tumor was pathologically detected; N.D., bone tumor was not detected.

 
Drug-induced body weight loss was not significantly different in any of the therapeutic groups.

In vivo induction of apoptosis and expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen following the therapy with minodronate and/or docetaxel for cancer cells in the bone tumor of athymic nude mice. We evaluated the effect of the combination therapy with minodronate on apoptosis induction and proliferation of cancer cells by TUNEL assay and immunohistochemistry for PCNA, respectively, in a nonestablished bone tumor model. The density of proliferative cells and apoptotic cells was expressed as an average percentage of five highest areas in total of 500 osteoclasts identified within a single 200x per field (ref. 29; Fig. 5A).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. A, in vivo induction of apoptosis and expression of PCNA following the therapy with minodronate (YM529, MINO) and/or docetaxel (TAX) for cancer cells in the bone tumor of athymic nude mice. We evaluated the effect of the combination therapy with minodronate on apoptosis induction and proliferation of cancer cells by TUNEL assay and immunohistochemistry for PCNA, respectively, in a nonestablished bone tumor model. The density of proliferative cells and apoptotic cells was expressed as an average percentage of five highest areas in total of 500 osteoclasts identified within a single 200x per field. *1 and *2, P < 0.05 against control (CTRL) and single therapy with minodronate; *3, P < 0.05; *4, P < 0.01 against control and single therapy with minodronate (Mann-Whitney statistical comparison). B, in vivo induction of apoptosis and expression of PCNA following the therapy with minodronate (YM529) and/or docetaxel for osteoclasts in the bone tumor of athymic nude mice. We evaluated the effect of the combination therapy with minodronate on proliferation and apoptosis induction of osteoclasts by TRAP staining and TUNEL assay in a nonestablished bone tumor model. TRAP-positive osteoclasts and apoptotic osteoclasts were counted and expressed as an average percentage of five highest areas in total of 100 osteoclasts identified within a single 200x per field. *1, P < 0.05 against control; *2, P < 0.01 against control and single therapy with docetaxel and P < 0.05 against single therapy with minodronate (Mann-Whitney statistical comparison).

 
The number of PCNA-positive cancer cells of bone tumors counted per 200x per field was significantly decreased from 27.3% (17.8-32.1%) in control tumors to 8.2% (5.4-10.1%) following the therapy of docetaxel (P < 0.05). However, minodronate did not significantly inhibit proliferation of cancer cells of bone tumors. The combination of docetaxel with minodronate significantly inhibited proliferation of cancer cells of bone tumors in 6.9% (4.5-8.7%) compared with controls and single therapy with minodronate (P < 0.05), whereas not significant to single therapy with docetaxel. There were no additive effects of the combination with minodronate on antiproliferation in cancer cells of bone tumors (Fig. 5A).

The number of apoptotic cancer cells of bone tumors counted per 200x per field was significantly increased from 0.9% (0.3-1.4%) in controls to 4.0% (1.2-6.0%) following the therapy of docetaxel (P < 0.05). However, minodronate did not significantly induce apoptosis of cancer cells of bone tumors. The combination of docetaxel with minodronate significantly enhanced apoptosis of cancer cells of bone tumors in 5.1% (2.7-7.1%) compared with controls and single therapy with minodronate (P < 0.01), whereas not significant to single therapy with docetaxel. There were no additive effects of the combination with minodronate on apoptosis induction in cancer cells of bone tumors (Fig. 5A).

In vivo induction of apoptosis and expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen following the therapy with minodronate and/or docetaxel for osteoclasts in the bone tumor of athymic nude mice. We evaluated the effect of the combination therapy with minodronate on proliferation and apoptosis induction of osteoclasts by TRAP staining and TUNEL assay in a nonestablished bone tumor model. TRAP-positive osteoclasts and apoptotic osteoclasts were counted and expressed as an average percentage of five highest areas in total of 100 osteoclasts identified within a single 200x per field (ref. 29; Fig. 5B).

The number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts of bone tumors counted per 200x per field was decreased from 32.8% (28.0-44.0%) in control tumors to 22.0% (20.0-28.0%) following the therapy of docetaxel but not significantly. Minodronate markedly inhibited proliferation in 17.2% (10.0-24.0%) of osteoclasts of bone tumors compared with controls (P < 0.05). The combination of docetaxel with minodronate additively and significantly inhibited proliferation of osteoclasts of bone tumors in 5.6% (4.0-8.0%) compared with controls (P < 0.01) and single therapy groups (P < 0.01 with docetaxel and P < 0.05 with minodronate; Fig. 5B). Although the administration of minodronate markedly inhibited proliferation of osteoclasts in bone tumors, there was no significant difference in the number of apoptotic osteoclasts in bone tumors in any of the therapeutic groups (Fig. 5B).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TCC of the urinary tract is a chemosensitive tumor. However, while establishing metastasis, TCC acquires the potential for resistance to cisplatin-based conventional chemotherapy. TCC in the urinary tract frequently metastasizes to the systemic lymph nodes and distant organs, such as the lung, liver, brain, and bone (4). Among the distant metastases, bone metastasis is consistently resistant to conventional chemotherapy (5).

Recently, docetaxel clinically yielded promising results as a key agent in advanced or metastatic TCC of the urothelium, which was resistant to cisplatin. Various docetaxel-containing regimens are also being studied and have resulted in favorable efficacy findings (2931). On the other hand, a newly developed third-generation bisphosphonate, minodronate (YM529), has been reported to inhibit osteolytic bone metastasis from several cancers (3234). Therefore, we hypothesized that taxane cytotoxicity would be complimentary to antitumor effect by minodronate and provide additive or synergistic therapeutic effects on tumorigenicity in bone metastasis model. These novel preventive and therapeutic strategies are mandatory if we are to improve the outcome of patients with osteolytic bone metastasis of TCC.

In the present study, we showed that minodronate had a preventive effect on nonestablished osteolytic bone tumor of a human TCC, UMUC-14, which was partial resistant to cisplatin. The IC50 of UMUC-14 cells treated with cisplatin was >1 µg/mL compared with docetaxel (<0.001 µg/mL). Moreover, no additive effect of cisplatin was shown with minodronate (data was not shown). Minodronate alone could completely inhibit tumor growth in 5 of 10 (50%) bone tumor models of athymic nude mice. In vivo therapy with minodronate resulted in significant regression of bone tumor [median volume (range), 63.3 cm3 (0-384.7 cm3)] compared with the controls given PBS [487.0 cm3 (0-1899.7); P < 0.05]. These effects were mainly mediated by growth inhibition of osteoclasts, which in turn inhibited osteoclastic function (osteolytic bone resorption). In vivo therapy with minodronate also inhibited the proliferation of osteoclasts markedly. However, apoptosis was induced in a few residual osteoclasts, similar to the condition in the therapeutic groups without minodronate. From these findings, we infer that minodronate may act on various stages of osteoclast generation. These findings can be assumed to be the last stage of apoptosis. Further studies are being undertaken to determine the exact apoptosis trigger sites. Moreover apoptosis induction and cytostatic effects on cancer cells by some bisphosphonates (1015, 17, 33) have been reported recently. However, in this study, minodronate did not significantly exhibit apoptosis induction and cytostatic effects and did not directly enhance the cytotoxicity of docetaxel against human TCC, UMUC-14 cells at an adequate biological dose.

On the other hand, the chemotherapeutic agent, docetaxel, completely inhibited tumor growth in 6 of 10 bone tumor models of athymic nude mice, showing an efficacy of a significant 60%. These effects were observed due to the growth inhibition and apoptosis induction of cancer cells. Docetaxel also affected the osteoclast population but with much less efficiency than minodronate. In vivo therapy with docetaxel resulted in a few regression of bone tumor [median volume (range), 117.7 cm3 (0-502.4)] but with much less efficiency than minodronate [63.3 cm3 (0-384.7 cm3)]. From the point of view of the result in the in vivo therapy with individual drug, minodronate, and docetaxel, we would conclude that the inhibitory efficiency against bone tumor may be due predominantly to the suppression of osteoclasts proliferation using minodronate.

However, from the present findings, we understand that the inhibition of cancer cells by docetaxel alone or the inhibition of osteoclasts by minodronate alone were not sufficient to show in vivo tumor reduction of bone tumor. This suggests that wholistic antitumor and antiosteoclastic actions are essential targets of any potential therapeutic agent. As per our current observations, the combination of minodronate with docetaxel completely inhibited tumor growth in seven of nine (77.8%) bone tumor models of athymic nude mice and complementarily enhanced inhibitory effects on nonestablished osteolytic bone tumor of a human TCC compared with control (P < 0.001) and individual drug therapy (P < 0.01 with docetaxel and P < 0.05 with minodronate). In vivo treatment and also in vivo therapy with both minodronate and docetaxel significantly inhibited proliferation of osteoclasts without an increase in apoptosis compared with minodronate alone. These findings suggested the other cytotoxic effects excluding apoptosis (e.g., cell necrosis, etc.), which is cell death without DNA fragmentation may act on osteoclasts inhibition in the combination treatment.

Previous studies have reported inhibitory effects of minodronate on bone metastasis (3335). Several reports showed that the indirect antitumor effect of minodronate was additively or synergistically enhanced in combination with cytotoxic agents, such as doxorubicin in prostate cancer (36) and UFT (37) and paclitaxel or docetaxel in breast cancer (38, 39), respectively. Our data, as well as these reports, indicate that docetaxel and minodronate have complementary cytotoxicities, providing a novel and effective biochemotherapy against osteolytic bone metastasis of human TCC. Previously, we showed that paclitaxel and docetaxel enhance the antiangiogenic agent monoclonal antibody C225, which blocks epidermal growth factor receptor function (40), monoclonal antibody DC101, which blocks VEGFR-2 function (41) and angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 (AGM-1470, O-chloracetyl-carbamoyl fumagillol; ref. 29), to inhibit tumorigenicity and spontaneous lymph node metastasis of human TCC. These effects are mediated by the inhibition of angiogenesis and also the apoptosis induction of both tumor and endothelial cells. We conclude from these reports, as well as from the present study, that taxanes have complementary cytotoxicities to molecular targeting agents, including antiangiogenic agents, and can provide additive or synergistic inhibitory effects on tumorigenicity and metastasis.

In summary, the present study provides evidence that docetaxel enhances the effects of minodronate by increasing its inhibitory effect on bone tumorigenicity of athymic nude mice. Induction of apoptosis in cancer cells by docetaxol and the antiosteoclastic activity by minodronate seem to act synergistically to enhance efficacy. These studies indicate that docetaxel and minodronate have complementary cytotoxicities, providing a clear rationale for investigation in future clinical trials.


    Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 5/ 9/05; revised 6/ 5/05; accepted 6/13/05.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ahmedin J, Ram CT, Taylor M, et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:8–29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Caldwell WL. Carcinoma of the urinary bladder. JAMA 1974;229:1643–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Millikan R, Dinney CPN. The role of chemotherapy in the management of the patient with T3b bladder cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 1996;14:81–5.[Medline]
  4. Wallmeroth A, Wagner U, Moch H, et al. Patterns of metastasis in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (pT2-4): an autopsy study on 367 patients. Urol Int 1999;62:69–75.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Lee MH, Chen MT, Chen KK, et al. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urinary tract: a preliminary report. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992;30:81–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Elte JW, Bijvoet OL, Cleton FJ, van Oosterom AT, Sleeboom HP. Osteolytic bone metastases in breast carcinoma pathogenesis, morbidity and bisphosphonate treatment. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1986;22:493–500.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Berenson JR, Lipton A. Use of bisphosphonates in patients with metastatic bone disease. Oncology (Huntingt) 1998;12:1573–9; discussion 1579–81.
  8. Green JR. Antitumor effects of bisphosphonates. Cancer 2003;97:840–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Dunford JE, Thompson K, Coxon FP, et al. Structure-activity relationships for inhibition of farnesyl diphosphate synthase in vitro and inhibition of bone resorption in vivo by nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001;296:235–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lee MV, Fong EM, Singer FR, Guenette RS. Bisphosphonate treatment inhibits the growth of prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res 2001;61:2602–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Oades GM, Senaratne SG, Clarke IA, Kirby RS, Colston K. Nitrogen containing bisphosphonates induce apoptosis and inhibit the mevalonate pathway, impairing Ras membrane localization in prostate cancer cells. J Urol 2003;170:246–52.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Shipman CM, Rogers MJ, Apperley JF, Russell RG, Croucher PI. Bisphosphonates induce apoptosis in human myeloma cell lines: a novel anti-tumour activity. Br J Haematol 1997;98:665–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Hiraga T, Williams PJ, Mundy GR, Yoneda T. The bisphosphonate ibandronate promotes apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells in bone metastases. Cancer Res 2001;614418–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Cheng YY, Huang L, Lee KM, Li K, Kumta SM. Alendronate regulates cell invasion and MMP-2 secretion in human osteosarcoma cell lines. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2004;42:410–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Iguchi T, Miyakawa Y, Yamamoto K, Kizaki M, Ikeda Y. Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates induce S-phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of myeloma cells by activating MAPK pathway and inhibiting the mevalonate pathway. Cell Signal 2003;15:719–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Sasaki A, Boyce BF, Story B, et al. Bisphosphonate risedronate reduces metastatic human breast cancer burden in bone in nude mice. Cancer Res 1995;55:3551–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Senaratne SG, Pirianov G, Mansi JL, Arnett TR, Colston KW. Bisphosphonates induce apoptosis in human breast cancer cell lines. Br J Cancer 2000;82:1459–68.[Medline]
  18. Bissery MC, Guenard D, Gueritte-Voegelein F, Lavelle F. Experimental antitumor activity of taxotere (RP 56976, NSC 628503), a taxol analogue. Cancer Res 1991;51:4845–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Haldar S, Chintapalli J, Croce CM. Taxol induces bcl-2 phosphorylation and death of prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res 1996;56:1253–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rangel C, Niell H, Miller A, Cox C. Taxol and taxotere in bladder cancer: in vitro activity and urine stability. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1994;33:460–4.[Medline]
  21. Roth BJ, Dreicer R, Einhorn LH, et al. Significant activity of paclitaxel in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium: a phase II trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2264–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Rowinsky EK, Cazenave LA, Donehower RC. Taxol: a novel investigational antimicrotubule agent. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:1247–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wahl AF, Donaldson KL, Fairchild C, et al. Loss of normal p53 function confers sensitization to Taxol by increasing G2/M arrest and apoptosis [see comments]. Nat Med 1996;2:72–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Karashima T, Sweeney P, Kamat A, et al. Nuclear factor-{kappa}B mediates angiogenesis and metastasis of human bladder cancer through the regulation of interleukin-8. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:2786–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Weber KL, Doucet M, Price JE, Baker C, Kim SJ, Fidler IJ. Blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling leads to inhibition of renal cell carcinoma growth in the bone of nude mice. Cancer Res 2003;63:2940–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Huang SF, Kim SJ, Lee AT, et al. Inhibition of growth and metastasis of orthotopic human prostate cancer in athymic mice by combination therapy with pegylated interferon-{alpha}-2b and docetaxel. Cancer Res 2002;62:5720–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Nagashima M, Sakai A, Uchida S, Tanaka S, Tanaka M, Nakamura T. Bisphosphonate (YM529) delays the repair of cortical bone defect after drill-hole injury by reducing terminal differentiation of osteoblasts in the mouse femur. Bone 2005;36:502–11.[Medline]
  28. Cui N, Nomura T, Noma H, et al. Effect of YM529 on a model of mandibular invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma in mice. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:2713–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Inoue K, Chikazawa M, Fukata S, Yoshikawa C, Shuin T. Docetaxel enhances the therapeutic effect of the angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 (AGM-1470) in metastatic human transitional cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:886–99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Dreicer R, Manola J, Schneider DJ, et al. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Phase II trial of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Cancer 2003;97:2743–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Gitlitz BJ, Baker C, Chapman Y, et al. A phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Cancer 2003;98:1863–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Yamagishi S, Abe R, Inagaki Y, et al. Minodronate, a newly developed nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, suppresses melanoma growth and improves survival in nude mice by blocking vascular endothelial growth factor signaling. Am J Pathol 2004;165:1865–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Zhang H, Yano S, Miki T, et al. A novel bisphosphonate minodronate (YM529) specifically inhibits osteolytic bone metastasis produced by human small-cell lung cancer cells in NK-cell depleted SCID mice. Clin Exp Metastasis 2003;20:153–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Sasaki A, Kitamura K, Alcalde RE, et al. Effect of a newly developed bisphosphonate, YH529, on osteolytic bone metastases in nude mice. Int J Cancer 1998;77:279–85.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Takahashi R, Shimazaki C, Inaba T, et al. A newly developed bisphosphonate, YM529, is a potent apoptosis inducer of human myeloma cells. Leuk Res 2001;25:77–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Tenta R, Tiblalexi D, Sotiriou E, et al. Bone microenvironment-related growth factors modulate differentially the anticancer actions of zoledronic acid and doxorubicin on PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Prostate 2004;59:120–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Hiraga T, Ueda A, Tamura D, et al. Effects of oral UFT combined with or without zoledronic acid on bone metastasis in the 4T1/luc mouse breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2003;106:973–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Magnetto S, Boissier S, Delmas PD, Clezardin P. Additive antitumor activities of taxoids in combination with the bisphosphonate ibandronate against invasion and adhesion of human breast carcinoma cells to bone. Int J Cancer 1999;83:263–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Jagdev SP, Coleman RE, Shipman CM, Rostami-H A, Croucher PI. The bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, induces apoptosis of breast cancer cells: evidence for synergy with paclitaxel. Br J Cancer 2001;84:1126–34.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Inoue K, Slaton JW, Perrotte P, et al. Paclitaxel enhances the effects of the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody ImClone C225 in mice with metastatic human bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:4874–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Inoue K, Slaton JW, Davis DW, et al. Treatment of human metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in a murine model with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody DC101 and paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:2635–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Nomura, W.-C. Huang, H. E. Zhau, D. Wu, Z. Xie, H. Mimata, M. Zayzafoon, A. N. Young, F. F. Marshall, M. N. Weitzmann, et al.
{beta}2-Microglobulin Promotes the Growth of Human Renal Cell Carcinoma through the Activation of the Protein Kinase A, Cyclic AMP-Responsive Element-Binding Protein, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Axis
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7294 - 7305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, K.
Right arrow Articles by Shuin, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, K.
Right arrow Articles by Shuin, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online