
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Human Cancer Biology |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 University of Pennsylvania and 2 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Philadelphia
Requests for reprints: Peter J. O'Dwyer, University of Pennsylvania, 51 North 39th Street, MAB Suite 103, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Phone: 215-662-8636; Fax: 215-243-3269; E-mail: peter.odwyer{at}uphs.upenn.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B (4, 5). Hurwitz et al. have shown recently that antiangiogenic therapy adds to the efficacy of chemotherapy in colorectal cancer (6), whereas Willett et al. showed that bevacizumab alone in rectal cancer markedly decreased blood flow to the tumor (7). These findings raise the possibility that apoptosis as a result of oxygen or nutrient withdrawal contributes to the therapeutic effect and prompted an investigation of the resistance of hypoxic cancer cells to apoptosis. We have developed a model of colon cancer in which cell lines in vitro have been treated with repeated intermittent hypoxia for a duration insufficient to cause cell kill.3 The colon carcinoma cell lines HT29 and HCT116 were subjected to 40 episodes of sublethal hypoxia (4 hours) thrice weekly. The resulting two hypoxia-conditioned cell lines have been maintained in culture for >2 years. Responses to hypoxia differed strikingly in the two cell lines. The HT29 hypoxia-conditioned cells were more resistant than the parental line to a 24-hour hypoxic challenge, whereas those from HCT116 surprisingly were more sensitive. Sensitivity to cisplatin and oxaliplatin in vitro correlated with that to hypoxia, suggesting a more general change in pathways leading to apoptosis following a potentially lethal event. We have used these cell lines to identify transcripts that may underlie resistance to apoptosis under hypoxia.
Our initial approach to identify candidate genes used PCR-selected cDNA subtractive hybridization, from which we identified several candidate genes. We selected macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) for additional study. Originally described as a T-cellderived soluble peptide that altered the mobility of macrophages (8), MIF is released from the anterior pituitary in response to physiologic stress, including endotoxic shock, hypersensitivity, and adult respiratory distress syndrome, as well as in immune disorders, such as glomerulonephritis and arthritis (9). Its effect is to oppose the immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids, but recent data propose additional roles for MIF in cell proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis (10). These observations have increased interest in MIF in cancer research.
In the current article, we describe the identification of MIF as a determinant of the apoptotic response to hypoxic exposure in colon cancer cells with varying resistance/sensitivity to hypoxia. MIF expression was induced by hypoxia in HCT116 and in the cell line derived from it by repeated exposure to hypoxia, HCP40. Expression was decreased in HT29 and in a similarly derived hypoxia-conditioned cell line HP40. Expression correlated with the apoptotic response to hypoxia in these cell lines. The addition of exogenous recombinant MIF (rMIF) rescued resistant cells from an antiapoptotic effect of its down-regulation. In an unrelated series of colon cancer cell lines, MIF expression and its inducibility by hypoxia varied. The ability to up-regulate MIF was positively correlated with cytotoxicity from oxaliplatin, supporting a more general involvement of MIF in apoptotic responses. MIF expression was also specific for carcinoma in samples derived from patients with colorectal cancer, in which expression varied widely at all stages of the disease.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Cytotoxicity was determined using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (11). For cytotoxicity under hypoxia, cells were plated at a density of 3,000 cells per well in 96-well plates. The plated cells were incubated overnight at 37°C at 5% CO2 and 95% air. The cells were placed in the anaerobic chamber (Forma Scientific), which was gassed using oxygen-poor (<1 part per 10 billion) 95% N2 and 5% CO2. After a 24-hour incubation in the anaerobic chamber, cells were transferred to the incubator at 37°C at 5% CO2 and 95% air for additional 48 hours, after which the MTT assay was done: 40 µL of 5 mg/µL MTT were added per well. After 2 hours at 37°C, the cells were lysed by adding 100 µL of 20% (w/v) SDS and 50% (v/v) N,N-dimethylformamide (pH 4.7) and incubated 3 hours at 37°C. The absorbance at 570 nm was determined using a microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT). The reported values are the result of duplicate determinations. The data shown in MTT assay are means ± SD of two independent experiments done in triplicate. The statistical significance of the differences between control and hypoxia-treated groups was assessed by the two-sample Student's t test between two paired samples.
PCR-selected cDNA subtractive hybridization. Subtractive hybridization was done using a commercially available kit (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions. mRNA from all four cell lines (HCT116 and HCP40 and HT29 and HP40) was isolated and converted into double-stranded cDNA. Both parental cell line mRNAs were used as drivers and that of the conditioned cell lines were used as testers. The tester and driver double-stranded cDNAs were separately digested by the RsaI restriction enzyme to obtain shorter, blunt-ended molecules. After ligation of two different adaptors (Adaptor I and Adaptor 2R provided by BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA) to the tester cDNA but not to the driver cDNA, the tester cDNA with adaptor and driver cDNA without adaptor were subjected to a first hybridization to remove common transcripts as well as to enrich for differentially expressed sequences. The samples were then hybridized a second time to further enrich for double-stranded cDNAs containing both adaptors. The double-stranded cDNA mixture was then subjected to two rounds of PCR amplification using PCR primers [primer 1 and primer 1R in the first PCR reaction and PCR-nested primer 2 with nested primer 2R in the second reaction (all primers provided by BD Biosciences)] to generate differentially expressed sequences. Finally, the PCR products were cloned into TA-vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for sequencing, and transcripts of interest were identified using Genbank.
Northern blotting. Total RNA was isolated using the Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Briefly, 107 cells were lysed in 3 µL Trizol reagent and incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature. After adding 0.6 µL chloroform, the tube was vortexed and incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes. The sample was centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The aqueous phase was mixed with 1.5 mL isopropyl alcohol to precipitate the RNA and again centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The RNA pellet was washed once with 70% ethanol and dissolved in diethyl pyrocarbonatetreated water. RNA was electrophoresed in a 1% agarose denaturing gel. The RNA was transferred to nylon membranes and hybridized to a 575-bp cDNA MIF probe (from the MIF coding sequence). A ß-actin probe was used a loading control. Membranes were washed for 1 hour in 2x SSC containing 0.5% SDS and at 60°C followed by 1 hour in 0.1x SSC containing 0.5% SDS. The filters were exposed to X-ray film at 70°C for 1 to 5 days.
Western blotting. Proteins from a total cell extract (20 µg/lane) were separated by electrophoresis in a SDS-12% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a Hybond-P membrane (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Western blotting was carried out using MIF antibody (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) and horseradish peroxidaseconjugated serum as the second antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). The Enhanced Chemiluminescence Plus detection system (Amersham) was used to develop the signal.
Immunohistochemistry. The formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded mouse tumors were sectioned to 5 µm thickness and fixed onto slides. After dewaxing and rehydrating, the slides were subjected for antigen retrieval by boiling in the microwave for 10 minutes with 0.01 mol/L citrate buffer (pH 6.0). After antigen retrieval, nonspecific binding of antibody was blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin/TBS for 15 minutes. After PBS wash, slides were incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-human MIF antibody (1:50 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 4°C overnight followed by incubation with biotinylated anti-rabbit antibody (DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, CA) and horseradish peroxidaseconjugated streptavidin (DAKO) with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine as the chromogen. The slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. Normal rabbit antibody was used as a negative control. A similar procedure was used for the human tumor specimens. Positive control slides were provided by the Cooperative Human Tissue Network.
Slides were evaluated by estimating the percentage of cells exhibiting MIF staining that was clearly distinct from any background staining. Faint staining that could not be convincingly positive was considered negative. Tumor cells and, when present, adenomatous and normal enterocytes were all evaluated for staining. Lymphocytes present in the colon served as an internal positive control.
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor stimulation and neutralization studies. We incubated colon cancer cells with both full-length rMIF and the inactivating antibody (both a gift from Dr. Gao; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) using concentrations and exposure times as described previously (12). In brief, the cells were cultured overnight in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum. The medium was replaced with fresh medium supplemented with purified rMIF at a final concentration of 100 ng/mL with or without a neutralizing anti-human MIF monoclonal antibody at 100 µg/mL. The cells were treated overnight and harvested for further analysis.
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor small interfering RNA treatment. The nucleotide sequences of dsRNA and complementary dsRNA for the construction of antisense to human MIF mRNA were based on MIF sequences (Genbank) as follows: [sense small interfering RNA (siRNA)] 5'-ACACCAACGUGCCCCGCGCdTdT-3' and (antisense siRNA) 5'-GCGCGGGGCACGUUGGUGUdTdT-3'. As a control, we used a RNA duplex constructed from a scrambled sequence as follows: 5'-GCGCGCUUUGUAGGAUUCGdTdT-3' and 5'-CGAAUCCUACAAAGCGCGCdTdT-3'. The MIF siRNA was effective in RNA interferencemediated suppression of MIF in our cell lines. The oligonucleotides were synthesized and purified by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). HCT116 and HCP40 cells (1 x 106) were used for transfection experiments. The cells were transfected with either the MIF siRNA or the control scrambled RNA duplex using the Genesilencer siRNA Transfection Reagent (Genlantis, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer's procedure. After 24 hours, the cells were exposed to hypoxia and evaluated by MTT assay as described above.
Statistics. Comparisons of quantitative measures between the cell lines were done using t tests, and P
0.05 was accepted as significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
We were also interested to know if, in the hypoxic cores of tumors grown in vivo, differences in the proportion of apoptotic cells might be appreciated. In Fig. 2D, we show regions of high pimonidazole staining reflecting hypoxia in both HT29 and HP40. In HT29 tumors, a substantial proportion of apoptotic cells is observed, but many fewer are present in HP40. This suggests that, in vivo also, the HP40 tumors are resistant to hypoxia-induced apoptosis.
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor content has a direct effect on survival in response to hypoxia. To determine if MIF production has a functional role in the survival of cells under hypoxic conditions, we added rMIF to the culture medium of HT29 and HP40 cells and examined their responses to hypoxia. We hypothesized that the addition of MIF would render the cells more susceptible to apoptosis as observed in the HCT116 and HCP40 lines. Exposure to hypoxia for 48 hours resulted in a 30% decrease in the survival of HT29 cells, but only a 10% decrease in the resistant HP40 cells (Fig. 3A). The addition of a neutralizing MIF antibody to HT29 cells rendered their profile more resistant but had no effect on that of HP40, which was already resistant (Fig. 3A). Conversely, the addition of rMIF to HT29 had a minimal effect on survival, whereas, in HP40, a marked increase in cell kill was observed, restoring the sensitivity of this line almost to that of the parental HT29. Specificity of this response for MIF was shown by coincubation with both MIF and the MIF antibody, which abolished the effect of MIF on survival in the resistant line. These experiments related the observed changes in gene expression to a functional effect on susceptibility of the cells to hypoxic cell death. The results of a colony-forming assay are shown (Fig. 3B): a similar pattern of cell kill as in the MTT assay is evident.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We analyzed the differences in gene expression among these cell lines to isolate transcripts associated with hypoxia sensitivity and resistance. From a subtractive hybridization screen emerged the cytokine MIF, which was found to be associated with the ability of colon cancer cells to enter apoptosis in response to hypoxia. MIF expression was induced by hypoxia in some but not all colon cancer cell lines, whereas induction has also been reported in glioma and squamous cell cancers (16, 17). In our experiments, the expression of MIF protein was closely correlated with that of the RNA, suggesting regulation at the level of transcription. Additional experiments using a reporter construct containing the MIF promoter confirmed that, in the cells with high MIF expression, transcriptional activity was increased.6 In this study, we validated MIF expression from the subtractive screen and showed that MIF and its induction by hypoxia were positively correlated with susceptibility to hypoxia- or DNA damageinduced apoptosis in cell lines, with concordant results. We found further that, in both cell lines and human tumors, expression of MIF is variable and, in clinical specimens, independent of stage of disease.
The functional relevance of MIF to hypoxia-induced apoptosis was established by the restoration of hypoxic sensitivity of HP40 by exogenous rMIF and siRNA down-regulation of MIF in the resistant line. However, a similar increase in sensitivity to apoptosis (i.e., to the level of HCT116, for example) was not observed when HT29 cells were similarly treated (data not shown). This finding suggests that increasing MIF alone will not assure a high level of sensitivity to hypoxia-induced apoptosis but that its suppression or absence is sufficient to result in resistance. A potential role for MIF supplementation in resistant tumors merits exploration.
A positive or facilitatory role of MIF in apoptosis may be inferred from several lines of evidence. MIF/ mice have normal development but are resistant to lethality from bacterial infection and endotoxin (18). Macrophages from such mice are resistant to tumor necrosis factor-
induced cytotoxicity in vitro. Similarly, MIF is described as an antagonist of glucocorticoid responses, although it is not reported if this extends to inhibition of glucocorticoid-induced lymphocyte apoptosis (9, 19). Our data suggest that the absence of MIF precludes the induction of hypoxia-induced apoptosis, and the mechanism of this effect will be important to elucidate. These data might seem to be inconsistent with a recent publication from Bernhagen's group in which MIF was shown to be antiapoptotic in tumor cells treated with camptothecin or exposed to oxidative stress through thiol starvation or diamide treatment (20). In the setting of thiol starvation, the antiapoptotic role of MIF was possibly associated with an apparent inhibition of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase phosphorylation of c-Jun at a late time point, but these effects are often variable with respect to the models and their influence on apoptosis (21). Interestingly, the effects of MIF in these models seemed to be exerted by different mechanisms. The apoptosis suppression by MIF in thiol-starved cells was dependent on the oxidoreductase Cys-Ala-Leu-Cys motif, because overexpression of the mutant C60SMIF construct failed to influence apoptosis. With camptothecin-induced apoptosis on the other hand, the serine-substituted protein was equally effective in suppressing apoptosis. Other groups have reported the suppression of p53-mediated apoptosis by MIF (22, 23) and suggest a link between the enzymatic redox function of MIF and its role in the regulation of cell survival (24). Nguyen et al. (20) have shown that MIF suppresses pro-oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. It is possible that the effects observed with hypoxia-induced apoptosis may be specific to that stimulus; if supported in further studies in vivo, a clear opportunity for selective therapeutic intervention may be provided.
An extensive prior literature supports a growth-promoting role for MIF, however, and these effects on apoptosis may seem to be in conflict. It has been reported that MIF is expressed in several types of tumors, including myelomonocytic leukemia (25), prostate cancer (26), breast cancer (27), colon cancer (28, 29), and lung cancer (30). However, the precise role of MIF in carcinogenesis and tumor progression remains unclear. In colon cancer cells, Takahashi et al. found that MIF was expressed and that its inhibition by an antisense construct resulted in a 40% decrease in growth (28). In a lymphoma model, similar inhibition of tumor cell growth was observed (31). Interestingly, in this model, there seemed to be minimal effects on the tumor cells, whereas profound inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation occurred. This antiangiogenic effect was confirmed in a melanoma cell model by Shimizu et al. (32). Munaut et al. found that, in human glioblastomas, MIF expression correlated with vascular endothelial growth factor expression (33). Because in the colon cancer cell lines described here there is increased angiogenesis and elevated vascular endothelial growth factor expression in vivo with both conditioned cell lines,4 MIF expression is dissociated from angiogenesis in this model.
The link with tumor cell proliferation is, however, well preserved in this model: the doubling time of the HCT116 derivative HCP40 is decreased, whereas that of HP40 is increased relative to the parental lines. A contribution of MIF to proliferation is suggested also by the work of Hudson et al. (22), who showed that p53-mediated activation of the cell cycle inhibitor p21 could be abrogated by MIF. Additional support for the importance of MIF in progression of cancer comes from the studies of Bucala's group, who showed that proliferation and carcinogenesis in MIF knockouts are p53 dependent (34). A p53-dependent mechanism is especially likely in the HCT116-derived cells: unlike HT29, HCT116 has intact p53 function.
The biology of MIF and its effects on proliferation and survival are complex and sometimes contradictory (35). Like other redox proteins, MIF seems to be multifunctional, with both a redox and possibly an isomerase role, the biological substrate for which has not yet been defined (36, 37). Despite extensive efforts, a receptor for MIF has not yet been identified, and its access to cells seems to occur through endocytosis (38). The protein is predominantly localized in the cytoplasm, although a minority of tumors shows nuclear staining on immunohistochemical analysis. Protein partners include CD74, Jab-1 (a c-Jun NH2-terminal kinaseinteractive protein), and an antioxidant protein PAG, but the functional implications of these interactions remain to be elucidated (3941). The activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways by MIF in this model is consistent with previous work (12), and additional participants in signaling pathways, including protein kinase A and phospholipase A2, are subject to MIF regulation (42). Our work supports an autocrine mechanism of MIF regulation in these cells, and elucidation of this pathway may identify additional targets for modifying the expression of MIF in hypoxic cells.
Taken together, these data indicate that MIF may be required for hypoxia-induced apoptosis in vitro and that its variable expression in human colon cancers may indicate a functional role in vivo. We suggest that MIF expression in colorectal cancer may be a marker of susceptibility to therapies that may depend on induction of hypoxia, possibly including antiangiogenic therapy.
| Appendix 1. Genes isolated through subtractive hybridization from hypoxia-conditioned cell lines |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
3 K.S. Yao et al. In vitro hypoxia-conditioned colon cancer cell lines derived from HCT116 and HT29 exhibit altered apoptosis susceptibility and a more angiogenic profile in vivo, submitted for publication, 2005. ![]()
4 K.S. Yao et al., submitted for publication, 2005. ![]()
5 M. Selvakumaran et al. Antitumor effect of the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab is dependent on susceptibility of tumors to hypoxia-induced apoptosis, submitted for publication, 2005. ![]()
6 K.S. Yao and P.J. O'Dwyer, data not shown. ![]()
Received 1/18/05; revised 4/22/05; accepted 5/24/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B in the induction of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase (DT-diaphorase) by hypoxia, oltipraz and mitomycin C. Biochem Pharmacol 1995;49:27582.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. A. Vasilevskaya, M. Selvakumaran, and P. J. O'Dwyer Disruption of Signaling through SEK1 and MKK7 Yields Differential Responses in Hypoxic Colon Cancer Cells Treated with Oxaliplatin Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2008; 74(1): 246 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. Hsieh, M. Frink, C.-H. Hsieh, M. A. Choudhry, M. G. Schwacha, K. I. Bland, and I. H. Chaudry Downregulation of migration inhibitory factor is critical for estrogen-mediated attenuation of lung tissue damage following trauma-hemorrhage Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): L1227 - L1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-A Seong, H. Jung, and H. Ha NM23-H1 Tumor Suppressor Physically Interacts with Serine-Threonine Kinase Receptor-associated Protein, a Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-beta) Receptor-interacting Protein, and Negatively Regulates TGF-beta Signaling J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2007; 282(16): 12075 - 12096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-A Seong, H. Jung, K.-T. Kim, and H. Ha 3-Phosphoinositide-dependent PDK1 Negatively Regulates Transforming Growth Factor-beta-induced Signaling in a Kinase-dependent Manner through Physical Interaction with Smad Proteins J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2007; 282(16): 12272 - 12289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Maity and C. Koumenis HIF and MIF--a nifty way to delay senescence? Genes & Dev., December 15, 2006; 20(24): 3337 - 3341. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Learn, P. E. Fecci, R. J. Schmittling, W. Xie, I. Karikari, D. A. Mitchell, G. E. Archer, Z. Wei, H. Dressman, and J. H. Sampson Profiling of CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+CD25+CD45RO+FoxP3+ T Cells in Patients with Malignant Glioma Reveals Differential Expression of the Immunologic Transcriptome Compared with T Cells from Healthy Volunteers Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7306 - 7315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. O'Dwyer The Present and Future of Angiogenesis-Directed Treatments of Colorectal Cancer Oncologist, October 1, 2006; 11(9): 992 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |