Clinical Cancer Research Holland2
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Downie, D.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, G. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Downie, D.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, G. I.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 11, 7369-7375, October 15, 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Profiling Cytochrome P450 Expression in Ovarian Cancer: Identification of Prognostic Markers

Diane Downie1, Morag C.E. McFadyen1, Patrick H. Rooney1,3, Margaret E. Cruickshank2, David E. Parkin2, Iain D. Miller1, Colin Telfer3, William T. Melvin3 and Graeme I. Murray1

Authors' Affiliations: 1 Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen; 2 Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary; and 3 Auvation, Ltd., Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Graeme I. Murray, Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1224-553794/554785; Fax: 44-1224-663002; E-mail: g.i.murray{at}abdn.ac.uk.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: The cytochromes P450 are a multigene family of enzymes with a central role in the oxidative metabolism of a wide range of xenobiotics, including anticancer drugs and biologically active endogenous compounds. The purpose of this study was to define the cytochrome P450 profile of ovarian cancer and identify novel therapeutic targets and establish the prognostic significance of expression of individual cytochrome P450s in this type of cancer.

Experimental Design: Immunohistochemistry for a panel of 23 cytochrome P450s and cytochrome P450 reductase was done on an ovarian cancer tissue microarray consisting of 99 primary epithelial ovarian cancers, 22 peritoneal metastasis, and 13 normal ovarian samples. The intensity of immunoreactivity in each sample was established by light microscopy.

Results: In primary ovarian cancer, several P450s (CYP1B1, CYP2A/2B, CYP2F1, CYP2R1, CYP2U1, CYP3A5, CYP3A7, CYP3A43, CYP4Z1, CYP26A1, and CYP51) were present at a significantly higher level of intensity compared with normal ovary. P450 expression was also detected in ovarian cancer metastasis and CYP2S1 and P450 reductase both showed significantly increased expression in metastasis compared with primary ovarian cancer. The presence of low/negative CYP2A/2B (log rank = 7.06, P = 0.008) or positive CYP4Z1 (log rank = 6.19, P = 0.01) immunoreactivity in primary ovarian cancer were each associated with poor prognosis. Both CYP2A/2B and CYP4Z1 were also independent markers of prognosis.

Conclusions: The expression profile of individual P450s has been established in ovarian cancer. Several P450s show increased expression in ovarian cancer and this provides the basis for developing P450-based therapeutics in ovarian cancer. Expression of CYP2A/2B or CYP4Z1 in primary ovarian cancer were independent markers of prognosis.

Ovarian cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy worldwide; yet, the 5-year survival rate for this disease has remained low at ~30% for the last 20 years and with relatively little recent improvement (1, 2). Poor prognosis is generally considered to be the result of late presentation when ovarian cancer is of advanced stage and the unpredictable and generally very limited response of this type of cancer to current cancer therapies (3, 4). Improved survival in ovarian cancer is, therefore, dependent on the development of new paradigms in treatment.

The cytochrome P450 (P450) enzymes are a large family of constitutive and inducible mono-oxygenase enzymes that metabolize many lipophilic, biologically active endogenous and xenobiotic substrates, including a large number of therapeutic drugs and toxic environmental chemicals (5–8). Currently, the human P450 superfamily is classified into 18 distinct families based on nucleic acid homology (5). Some P450s, especially the major xenobiotic metabolizing forms of P450, have been very well characterized, whereas very little is known about the biology of some of the more recently identified P450s. Individual P450s show characteristic cell type– and tissue-specific patterns of expression. The primary site of expression for the major xenobiotic-metabolizing P450s in normal tissues is the liver, although specific P450s are expressed in many extrahepatic tissues (9).

Several P450s, most notably CYP1B1, are overexpressed in tumors whereas individual P450s have been detected in a range of tumor types (10–16). The identification of P450s, especially those P450s that show enhanced expression in tumor tissue, provides potential targets from which chemotherapeutic strategies can be developed (17, 18). Several therapeutic approaches based on the expression and/or overexpression of P450s in tumors are beginning to be developed. These therapeutic strategies include P450 vaccines, P450-mediated prodrug activation, and P450 inhibitors (15, 16).

Several P450s are involved in the metabolism of a range of anticancer drugs and recent studies have shown that individual forms of P450 play a role in anticancer drug resistance (17, 18). CYP1B1 has been shown to be potentially involved in resistance to a range of anticancer drugs, particularly the taxane docetaxel (19). However, the outcome of P450-mediated anticancer drug metabolism in terms of activation or resistance in tumor cells is dependent on both the relative amount and activity of individual P450s present (18).

In this study, the P450 expression profile has been defined in primary and metastatic ovarian cancer and established those P450s that are overexpressed in ovarian cancer and markers of prognosis. This study provides the basis for the development of new treatment strategies based on the expression of P450s in ovarian cancer.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor samples. Samples of ovarian cancer that had been submitted to the Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen, over a 5-year period (1993-1998) for histopathologic diagnosis were used in this study. All the specimens had been fixed in formalin and selected tissue blocks embedded in wax. In total, samples from 115 patients were studied comprising 99 primary epithelial ovarian cancer samples, 22 metastases (all peritoneal metastases), and 13 normal ovarian tissue samples (all obtained from postmenopausal women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer in the contralateral ovary). Information regarding age, tumor histopathology (the histopathology of all cases was reviewed by an expert in gynecologic histopathology—I.D. Miller), Fesddration Internationale des Gynaecologistes et Obstetristes stage of disease, and survival was available for each case and is summarized in Table 1. The median survival of the patients was 40 months (mean 60) with the survival range between 1 and >126 months. At the time of the most recent follow-up, 62.5% of patients had died. The study had the approval of the Grampian Research Ethics Committee.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients in the study

 
Cytochrome P450 antibodies. A panel of 23 P450 antibodies and cytochrome P450 reductase were used in this study. Polyclonal antibodies to CYP2F1, CYP2J2, CYP2R1, CYP2S1, CYP2U1, CYP3A43, CYP4V2, CYP4X1, CYP4Z1, CYP24, CYP39A1, and CYP51A1 were raised to the COOH-terminal peptide of the relevant human P450 as previously described (20). These antibodies are all available from Auvation, Ltd. (Aberdeen, United Kingdom). Polyclonal antibodies to CYP1A1, CYP2C, and cytochrome P450 reductase were bought from Chemicon Europe (Chandlers Ford, United Kingdom), whereas a polyclonal antibody to CYP2E1 was obtained from Oxford Biomedical Research (Oxford, MI). Monoclonal antibodies to CYP1B1, CYP2A/2B (This antibody, which was raised to the COOH-terminal peptide of CYP2A6, recognized both CYP2A6 and CYP2B6, reflecting the very close sequence similarity of these two P450s and in particular the almost identical COOH-terminal amino acid sequences of these P450s. Therefore, this antibody has been designated CYP2A/CYP2B.), CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP4F11, and CYP26A1 were developed as previously described (20–22). These antibodies are all available from Auvation. Each monoclonal antibody, with the exception of CYP1B1 and CYP3A4, were produced by the immunization of mice to the appropriate COOH-terminal peptide conjugated to ovalbumin of the relevant human P450. A monoclonal antibody to CYP2D6 was bought from BD Biosciences (Oxford, United Kingdom).

Ovarian cancer tissue microarray. A three-block ovarian cancer tissue microarray was constructed using a procedure that we have previously described (20, 23). A single representative 1.6 mm core of tissue was taken from each donor block using a steel Menghini needle and arrayed into the recipient wax block. One section from each microarray was stained with H&E to confirm the histopathologic findings and the adequacy of tissue sampling.

Immunohistochemistry. The tissue microarray blocks were cut (5 µm) onto silane-coated glass slides. Slides were dewaxed in xylene, rehydrated in alcohol, and antigen retrieval when required was carried out for 20 minutes in citrate buffer [0.01 mol/L (pH 6)] in an 800 W microwave oven. The immunohistochemical characterization of the antibodies with formalin-fixed, wax-embedded sections, including the requirement for antigen retrieval, positive and negative controls, and the determination of optimum antibody dilutions has been previously described (20–22). Of the antibodies studied, only antibodies to CYP2C, CYP2D6, and CYP2J2 did not require an antigen retrieval step. Primary antibody appropriately diluted (Table 2) in antibody diluent (DakoCytomation, Ely, United Kingdom) was applied for 60 minutes at room temperature, then washed with buffer (DakoCytomation) followed by peroxidase blocking (DakoCytomation) for 5 minutes. The sections were then subject to a single 2-minute buffer wash. Prediluted peroxidase-polymer labeled goat antimouse/rabbit secondary antibody (Envision, DakoCytomation) was then applied for 30 minutes at room temperature, followed by further washing with wash buffer to remove unbound antibody. Sites of peroxidase activity were then shown with diaminobenzidine as the chromogen applied for three successive 5-minute periods. Finally, sections were washed in water, lightly counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted in DPX. Tissues known to express the relevant P450 were used as positive controls. Omitting the primary antibody from the immunohistochemical procedure and replacing it with antibody diluent or nonimmune rabbit serum acted as negative controls. The sections were evaluated by light microscopic examination and the intensity of immunostaining in each section assessed independently by two observers (D. Downie and G.I. Murray) using a scoring system that we have previously described (20, 23). In this system, the intensity of immunostaining in each core is assessed semiquantitatively and scored using the following scale; negative (absence of immunostaining = 0, weak immunoreactivity = 1, moderate immunoreactivity = 2, and strong immunoreactivity = 3). There were very few discrepancies (<5% of cases) in the assessment of the cases and these were resolved by simultaneous reevaluation by both observers. A core loss of up to 15% was accepted in accordance with previous reports (23, 24).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Cytochrome P450 antibodies used in this study and their conditions for use in immunohistochemistry

 
Statistical analysis. Statistical analyses including Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox multivariate regression analysis were done using SPSS v12.0.1 for Windows XP (SPSS UK, Ltd., Woking, United Kingdom). The log-rank test was used to determine survival differences between individual groups. We regarded P < 0.05 as significant.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
P450s in normal ovary. All of the P450s, with the exception of CYP1B1, showed immunoreactivity in normal ovary (Figs. 1Go–3). CYP2U1and CYP3A4 were the P450s that were most frequently expressed and at the highest level of intensity, whereas most of the other P450s displayed weak to moderate immunoreactivity in normal ovary. Within the ovary, it was stromal cells that showed positive immunoreactivity for individual P450s.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 1. Mean cytochrome P450 intensity scores in normal ovary, and in primary and metastatic ovarian cancer. *P450s (CYP1B1, CYP2A/2B, CYP2F1, CYP2R1, CYP2U1, CYP3A5 CYP3A7, CYP3A43, CYP4Z1, CYP26A1, and CYP51) that showed a significantly greater intensity of immunohistochemical staining in ovarian cancer compared with normal ovary. **CYP2S1 and P450 reductase showed significantly greater immunoreactivity in secondary tumors compared with primary ovarian cancer.

 


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2. The frequency distribution (percentage) of the intensity of individual P450s in normal ovary (A), primary ovarian cancer (B), and metastatic ovarian cancer (C).

 


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 3. The immunolocalization of cytochrome P450 CYP2A/2B in normal ovary (A), primary papillary serous ovarian cancer showing strong CYP2A/2B immunoreactivity (B), and strong immunoreactivity in a peritoneal metastasis from a papillary serous adenocarcinoma (C).

 
P450s in ovarian cancer. All the P450s displayed some immunoreactivity in ovarian cancer (Figs. 1–3). There was a higher frequency and greater intensity of immunohistochemical staining for all P450s, with the exception of CYP1A1, CYP4F11, CYP24, and CYP39, in ovarian cancer compared with normal ovary. The highest percentage of strong staining was observed for CYP2U1 and CYP3A7 with 73.6% and 70.8% of the tumors showing strong immunohistochemical staining, respectively, whereas for CYP1A1, CYP4X1, and CYP24 >60% of the cores were negative. There was a significantly greater intensity of immunohistochemical staining for CYP1B1 (P = 0.001), CYP2A/2B (P = 0.002), CYP2R1 (P = 0.006), CYP2U1 (P < 0.001), CYP3A5 (P < 0.001), CYP3A43 (P = 0.004), CYP4Z1 (P = 0.005), CYP26A1 (P < 0.001), and CYP51A1 (P = 0.01) in ovarian cancer compared with normal ovary (Fig. 1). P450 immunoreactivity was localized to the cytoplasm of tumor cells (Fig. 3) and there was diffuse immunoreactivity with no evidence of heterogeneity of immunohistochemical staining within individual tumor cores.

P450s in metastatic ovarian tissue. All of the P450s studied showed some degree of immunoreactivity in the ovarian metastasis (Figs. 1–3). The highest frequency of strong immunoreactivity was observed for CYP2A/2B, CYP2S1, and CYP3A7 with ≥50% of all cases showing strong immunoreactivity. The intensity of immunoreactivity in ovarian metastasis was significantly higher for CYP2S1 (P = 0.007) and P450 reductase (P = 0.02) compared with primary ovarian cancer (Fig. 1).

P450 expression and survival in ovarian cancer. There was poorer survival in those patients whose tumors showed no CYP2A/2B immunoreactivity or low or moderate CYP2A/2B immunoreactivity compared with those patients whose tumors showed strong immunoreactivity (log rank = 7.06, P = 0.008; Fig. 4). In the poor survival group (n = 48), there were 35 deaths and the median survival was 25 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 16-34; mean 40 months, 95% CI, 30-50]. In the good survival group (n = 43), there were 22 deaths and the median survival in this group was 74 months (95% CI, 6-142; mean 74 months, 95% CI, 59-90). There was significantly better survival for those patients whose tumors showed no CYP4Z1 immunoreactivity compared with patients whose tumors showed low, moderate, or strong immunoreactivity (log rank = 6.19, P = 0.01; Fig. 4). In the poor survival group (n = 67), there were 46 deaths and the median survival in this group was 29 months (95% CI, 17-41; mean 53 months, 95% CI, 41-65). In the good survival group (n = 17), there were six deaths and the median survival in this group was >126 months (mean 93 months, 95% CI, 71-115). Tumor stage (stage I versus stages II, III and IV, log rank = 17.6, P < 0.001) and serous histology type (log rank = 12.65, P = 0.002) were both prognostically significant in univariate survival analysis. Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor stage (hazard ratio, 5.82; 95% CI, 1.94-17.49; P = 0.002), CYP2A/2B (hazard ratio, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.25-4.28; P = 0.003), and CYP4Z1 (hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.29-8.45; P = 0.02) remained independently prognostically significant, whereas tumor histopathology was not an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.78).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 4. A, comparison of survival in patients whose tumors showed strong CYP2A/2B immunoreactivity and those tumors that have moderate, low, or negative immunoreactivity. There is poorer survival in those patients whose tumors expressed low CYP2A/2B immunoreactivity (log rank test = 7.06, P = 0.008). B, comparison of survival in patients whose tumors showed strong, moderate, or weak CYP4Z1 immunoreactivity and those that have no immunoreactivity. There is poorer survival in those patients whose tumors expressed CYP4Z1 (log-rank test = 6.19, P = 0.01).

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In this study, we have analyzed by immunohistochemistry P450 expression in primary ovarian cancer, metastatic ovarian cancer, and normal ovary and defined the expression profile for individual P450s in epithelial ovarian cancer. We have also established the prognostic significance of individual P450 expression in this type of tumor and found that low or negative expression of CYP2A/2B and high expression CYP4Z1 were both associated with poor survival and each of these P450s was an independent prognostic factor. However, the biological functions, including effects on cell growth and survival, of both CYP2A/2B and CYP4Z1 in ovarian cancer cells still require to be defined. Although xenobiotic substrates for CYP2A/2B are well characterized, endogenous substrates for this P450 are poorly described. Substrates (either xenobiotic or endogenous) for CYP4Z1 have yet to be characterized, although other members of the CYP4 family are predominantly involved in the metabolism of biologically active endogenous compounds, including fatty acids, prostaglandins, and other eicosanoids (9, 10).

It is still not sufficiently widely recognized that individual forms of P450 are overexpressed in specific types of cancer (10, 11, 18, 25) and that individual P450s represent particularly versatile therapeutic targets (17, 18), which can be exploited by a range of therapeutic strategies, including prodrug activation, immunotherapy, and inhibitors (17, 18). Furthermore, the increased expression of individual forms of P450 in specific types of tumors may also be readily exploited as diagnostic biomarkers. The development of P450-based vaccines offers a direct route to the clinical exploitation of the expression of these molecules in tumors. However, a P450-based prodrug activation strategy, utilizing P450 overexpression in tumors, has the greatest potential to offer significant therapeutic benefits while overcoming the problems of dose-limiting toxicity that limit the use of many of the current generation of anticancer drugs. In developing strategies to produce such P450-activated prodrugs, knowledge of the relative expression of individual P450s in other tissues may also be necessary to ensure that especially in the early stages of the drug development process the most suitable candidate compounds are identified and evaluated. Expression of P450s in tumors can be exploited both as a consequence of their overexpression in tumor cells and because of the distinct microenvironment in which tumors exists even when a P450 is present but not necessarily overexpressed. Hypoxia is one of the main features of the tumor microenvironment that is currently being exploited by P450-targeted therapy. AQ4N is a CYP3A-activated prodrug, which, in hypoxic conditions, is activated to a highly potent topoisomerase inhibitor and is currently being evaluated in early stage-clinical trials (26, 27). This P450 is present in some types of tumor (11) and is also present in normal tissues, particularly liver; however, AQ4N is not associated with hepatotoxicity (26, 27).

It is, therefore, important to define the expression profile of P450 in ovarian cancer and identify those P450s that are overexpressed, and hence most likely to be therapeutic targets or diagnostic biomarkers, and also establish their prognostic significance. The most frequently expressed P450s in normal ovary were CYP2U1 and CYP3A4, whereas CYP1B1 was the only P450 not to be detected in normal ovarian tissue, a finding consistent with our previous studies that have shown the presence of CYP1B1 in ovarian cancer cells with an absence of expression in normal ovarian tissue (15, 25).

Several P450s, in particular CYP1B1, CYP2U1, CYP3A5, and CYP26A1, showed a very significantly enhanced expression in the primary ovarian cancers compared with normal ovary. This further supports the concept of overexpression of individual forms of P450 in tumors (10) and also indicates that there is tumor type–specific expression of individual P450s (10, 11, 28). For example, the cytochrome P450 expression profile of ovarian cancer seems to be distinct from the profile of colorectal cancer where the most significantly overexpressed P450s are CYP2U1 and CYP51A1 (20). CYP1B1 showed a highly significant overexpression in ovarian cancer, and of the P450s that are overexpressed in tumors its exploitation as a therapeutic target is the most advanced with an anticytochrome P450 vaccine about to enter phase 2 clinical trials having completed a successful phase 1 trial (29). Although the P450s are located intracellularly, proteolytic processing of the P450s results in peptides being presented on the cell surface that are available to be recognized as tumor antigens (30, 31).

Because most chemotherapy is targeted at metastatic tumors, it is important to have knowledge of the expression profile of P450s in the metastases and how this relates to the expression pattern in the corresponding primary tumors. This is important because it cannot necessarily be assumed that the pattern of expression in the primary tumors will be reflected in the metastases. The expression pattern of P450s of ovarian cancer metastasis has not previously been studied. In this study, we found that CYP2S1 and cytochrome P450 reductase both showed significantly increased expression in metastases compared with primary ovarian cancer, whereas for all the other P450s there were no significant differences between the level of expression in primary tumors and metastases.

In conclusion, we have defined the P450 profile of ovarian cancer, peritoneal metastasis, and normal ovary. We have identified overexpression of several P450s in ovarian cancer, most notably CYP2A/2B and CYP4Z1. Both of these enzymes show independent prognostic significance.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Joan Aitken and Nicky Fyfe for technical assistance.


   Footnotes
 
Grant support: The Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive and Teaching Company Scheme (Knowledge Transfer Partnership).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note: M.C.E. McFadyen is currently in School of Pharmacy, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Received 3/ 3/05; revised 5/25/05; accepted 6/29/05.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cannistra SA. Cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2519–29.[Free Full Text]
  2. Seidman JD, Kurman RJ. Pathology of ovarian carcinoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2003;17:909–25.[Medline]
  3. Moss C, Kaye SB. Ovarian cancer: progress and continuing controversies in management. Eur J Cancer 2002;38:1701–7.
  4. Park TW, Kuhn WC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2004;4:639–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Nebert DW, Russell DW. Clinical importance of the cytochromes P450. Lancet 2002;360:1155–62.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Danielson PB. The cytochrome P450 superfamily: biochemistry, evolution and drug metabolism in humans. Curr Drug Metab 2002;3:561–97.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Windmill KF, McKinnon RA, Zhu X, Gaedigk A, Grant DM, McManus ME. The role of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in arylamine toxicity and carcinogenesis: functional and localization studies. Mutat Res 1997;376:153–60.[Medline]
  8. Guengerich FP, Shimada T. Activation of procarcinogens by human cytochrome P450 enzymes. Mutat Res 1998;400:201–13.[Medline]
  9. Ding X, Kaminsky LS. Human extrahepatic cytochromes P450: function in xenobiotic metabolism and tissue-selective chemical toxicity in the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2003;43:149–73.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Murray GI. The role of cytochrome P450 in tumour development and progression and its potential in therapy. J Pathol 2000;192:419–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Patterson LH, Murray GI. Tumour cytochrome P450 and drug activation. Curr Pharm Des 2002;8:1335–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Murray GI, Weaver RJ, Paterson PJ, Ewen SWB, Melvin WT, Burke MD. Expression of xenobiotic metabolising enzymes in breast cancer. J Pathol 1993;169:347–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kapucuoglu N, Coban T, Raunio H, et al. Expression of CYP3A4 in human breast tumour and non-tumour tissues. Cancer Lett 2003;202:17–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Murray GI, McFadyen MCE, Mitchell RT, Cheung Y-L, Kerr AC, Melvin WT. Cytochrome P450 CYP3A in human renal cell cancer. Br J Cancer 1999;79:1836–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Murray GI, Taylor MC, McFadyen MC, et al. Tumor-specific expression of cytochrome P450 CYP1B1. Cancer Res 1997;57:3026–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Murray GI, Melvin WT, Greenlee WF, Burke MD. Regulation, function and tissue-specific expression of cytochrome P450 CYP1B1. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2001;41:297–316.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. McFadyen MCE, Melvin WT, Murray GI. Cytochrome P450 enzymes: novel options for cancer therapeutics. Mol Cancer Ther 2004;3:363–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Rooney PH, Telfer C, McFadyen MCE, Melvin WT, Murray GI. The role of cytochrome P450 in cytotoxic bioactivation: future therapeutic directions. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2004;4:257–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. McFadyen MCE, McLeod HL, Jackson FC, Melvin WT, Doehmer J, Murray GI. Cytochrome P450 CYP1B1 protein expression: a novel mechanism of anti-cancer drug resistance. Biochem Pharmacol 2001;62:207–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Kumarakulasingham M, Rooney PH, Dundas SR, et al. Cytochrome P450 profile of colorectal cancer: identification of markers of prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:3758–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. McFadyen MCE, Breeman S, Payne S, et al. Immunohistochemical localisation of cytochrome P450 CYP1B1 in breast cancer with monoclonal antibodies specific for CYP1B1. J Histochem Cytochem 1999;47:1457–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Murray GI, Barnes TS, Sewell HF, Ewen SWB, Melvin WT, Burke MD. The immunocytochemical localisation and distribution of cytochrome P-450 in normal human hepatic and extrahepatic tissues with a monoclonal antibody to human cytochrome P-450. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1988;25:465–75.[Medline]
  23. Dundas SR, Lawrie LC, Rooney PH, Murray GI. Mortalin is overexpressed by colorectal cancer and correlates with poor survival. J Pathol 2005;205:74–81.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Gulman C, O'Grady A. Tissue microarrays: an overview. Curr Diagn Pathol 2003;9:149–54.
  25. McFadyen MCE, Cruickshank ME, Miller ID, et al. Cytochrome P450 CYP1B1 is overexpressed in primary and secondary ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 2001;85:242–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Patterson LH. Bioreductively activated antitumor N-oxides: the case of AQ4N, a unique approach to hypoxia-activated cancer chemotherapy. Drug Metab Rev 2002;34:581–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Patterson LH, McKeown SR. AQ4N: a new approach to hypoxia-activated cancer chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2000;83:1589–93.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Gharavi N, El-Kadi AOS. Expression of cytochrome P450 in lung tumor. Curr Drug Metab 2004;5:203–10.[Medline]
  29. Maecker B, Sherr DH, Vonderheide RH, et al. The shared tumor-associated antigen cytochrome P450 1B1 is recognized by specific cytotoxic T cells. Blood 2003;102:3287–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Luby TM, Cole G, Baker L, Kornher JS, Ramstedt U, Hedley ML. Repeated immunization with plasmid DNA formulated in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles is well tolerated and stimulates durable T cell responses to the tumor-associated antigen cytochrome P450 1B1. Clin Immunol 2004;112:45–53.[Medline]
  31. Maecker B, von Bergwelt-Baildon MS, Sherr DH, Nadler LM, Schultze JL. Identification of a new HLA-A*0201-restricted cryptic epitope from CYP1B1. Int J Cancer 2005;115:333–6.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BloodHome page
C. Rodriguez-Antona, S. Leskela, M. Zajac, M. Cuadros, J. Alves, M. V. Moneo, C. Martin, J. C. Cigudosa, A. Carnero, M. Robledo, et al.
Expression of CYP3A4 as a predictor of response to chemotherapy in peripheral T-cell lymphomas
Blood, November 1, 2007; 110(9): 3345 - 3351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. A. Barnett, D. L. Urbauer, G. I. Murray, G. N. Fuller, and A. B. Heimberger
Cytochrome P450 1B1 Expression in Glial Cell Tumors: An Immunotherapeutic Target
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3559 - 3567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. Ekins, D. C. Mankowski, D. J. Hoover, M. P. Lawton, J. L. Treadway, and H. J. Harwood Jr.
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis of Human CYP51 Inhibitors
Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2007; 35(3): 493 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
L.-R. Zhu, P. E. Thomas, G. Lu, K. R. Reuhl, G.-Y. Yang, L.-D. Wang, S.-L. Wang, C. S. Yang, X.-Y. He, and J.-Y. Hong
CYP2A13 in Human Respiratory Tissues and Lung Cancers: An Immunohistochemical Study with A New Peptide-Specific Antibody
Drug Metab. Dispos., October 1, 2006; 34(10): 1672 - 1676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
D. N. Shelton, I. T. Sandoval, A. Eisinger, S. Chidester, A. Ratnayake, C. M. Ireland, and D. A. Jones
Up-regulation of CYP26A1 in Adenomatous Polyposis Coli-Deficient Vertebrates via a WNT-Dependent Mechanism: Implications for Intestinal Cell Differentiation and Colon Tumor Development.
Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 66(15): 7571 - 7577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
Z.-L. Wu, C. D. Sohl, T. Shimada, and F. P. Guengerich
Recombinant Enzymes Overexpressed in Bacteria Show Broad Catalytic Specificity of Human Cytochrome P450 2W1 and Limited Activity of Human Cytochrome P450 2S1
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2006; 69(6): 2007 - 2014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Downie, D.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, G. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Downie, D.
Right arrow Articles by Murray, G. I.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online