
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Human Cancer Biology |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Department of Molecular Oncology, Gastrointestinal Section; 2 Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, John Wayne Cancer Institute; and 3 Division of Surgical Pathology, Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California
Requests for reprints: Dave S.B. Hoon, Department of Molecular Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute, 2200 Santa Monica Boulevard, Santa Monica, CA 90404. Phone: 310-449-5264; Fax: 310-449-5282; E-mail: hoon{at}jwci.org.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design: The level of IAPs and C-Met mRNA expression was assessed using a quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) assay on colorectal normal mucosa (n = 13), adenomas (n = 6), and colorectal cancer tumors (n = 50). The role of HGF/C-Met pathway through Akt and XIAP was investigated by small interfering RNA (siRNA) and quantitative RT-PCR analysis of colorectal cancer lines.
Results: Of the IAPs, only XIAP showed significant correlation to tumor development and progression. XIAP mRNA level in primary colorectal cancer was significantly higher than that in colorectal normal mucosa (P = 0.01); liver metastases was significantly higher than primary colorectal cancer tumors (P = 0.04); and primary colorectal cancer N1/N2 cases were significantly higher than N0 cases (P = 0.008). HGF stimulation of colorectal cancer lines enhanced XIAP mRNA expression but not other IAPs. Activation of XIAP expression by HGF was inhibited by siRNA targeting Akt1 and Akt2.
Conclusions: Activation of C-MET enhances XIAP through the Akt pathway. XIAP up-regulation was shown to be correlated to colorectal cancer tumor progression. The Akt-XIAP pathway may be a potential molecular target for regulating colorectal cancer progression.
C-Met, a proto-oncogene, is suggested to be associated with colorectal cancer progression (4, 5). The C-Met protein contains a tyrosine kinase domain, which is found to initiate various cell function regulating signals via the Akt signaling pathway (68). Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), also known as scatter factor, produced by stromal fibroblasts or other cell types, such as hepatocytes, can function in a paracrine manner on cancer cells via the C-Met receptor (4). The activation of C-Met by the HGF/scatter factor ligand can induce proliferation, motility, adhesion, and invasion of tumor cells (911). HGF/scatter factor activation of the C-Met tyrosine kinase pathway has been thought of as one of the key factors influencing the events of tumor progression. Several studies have reported overexpression of C-Met mRNA/protein in colorectal cancer (5, 12, 13). We previously reported that higher C-Met mRNA expression by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) assay was correlated with aggressive primary tumor invasion and presence of regional lymph node metastasis (5).
Cell death is regulated by antiapoptotic proteins, such as Bcl-2 family and the inhibitor of the apoptosis protein (IAP) family (1416). Bcl-2 inhibits cytochrome c release from mitochondria, whereas proteins of the IAP family act downstream to prevent processing of caspase-9 by cytochrome c and the apoptotic protease activating factor 1 apoptosome complex (14, 15). The IAP family members, X-linked IAP (XIAP), survivin, and livin, have been shown in colorectal cancer cells (1719).
XIAP is located on chromosome Xq25 and encodes a cytoplasmic protein of 497 amino acids, 57 kDa (20, 21). XIAP prevents processing of procaspase-3, procaspase-6, and procaspase-7 by binding or blocking the activity of caspase-9 (17). The expression of XIAP has been shown to be up-regulated in many human carcinomas (22, 23). Survivin, an IAP, is located on chromosome 17q25 and encodes a 17-kDa protein (15, 24). Although the mechanism of inhibiting apoptosis by survivin has not been conclusively defined, it has been reported that survivin blocks the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis by interacting with caspase-9 and preventing apoptosomes in cells from receiving an apoptotic stimulus (25). Survivin can also bind the effector cell death proteases, caspase-3 and caspase-7, to inhibit caspase activity and cell death (26). Overexpression of survivin has been shown to have oncogenic potential; it overrides the G2-M phase cell cycle checkpoint to enforce progression of cells through mitosis and affects microtubule stability of the mitotic spindles (15, 27). Livin, located on chromosome 20q13, is another major IAP member (28). Livin, similar to other IAP members, can inhibit apoptosis by preventing apoptotic protease activating factor 1 and cytochrome c from activating caspase-9 (28).
Recent studies suggested that HGF/scatter factor activation of the C-Met tyrosine kinase pathway may be influencing antiapoptosis and cell survival of tumor cells (6). We hypothesized that HGF activation of those colorectal cancer overexpressing C-Met receptor may regulate IAP family proteins via the Akt signaling pathway. IAP expression in colorectal cancer specimens may be related to tumor clinicopathology characteristics of colorectal cancer development, and tumor progression. In this study, we assessed mRNA expression of XIAP, survivin, and livin and compared them to C-Met in colorectal normal mucosa, colorectal adenoma, and colorectal cancer specimens. The regulatory role of HGF/C-Met pathway in antiapoptotic protein expression through IAPs expression via Akt was investigated in in vitro studies.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell lines. Three established colorectal cancer cell lines, HT-29, DLD1, and SW480, were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). All established cell lines were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 100 mL/L heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, penicillin, and streptomycin (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) in T75-cm2 flask as previously described (29). Total RNA was extracted from cells when cell cultures reached 70% to 80% confluence as previously described (30).
Patients and specimens. Patients with colorectal tumors undergoing surgery were accrued from the John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint Johns Health Center (Santa Monica, CA) and Century City Hospital (Los Angeles, CA). All patients in the study were consented according to the guidelines set forth by the John Wayne Cancer Institute and other participating center's human subjects Institutional Review Board committee. We studied a total of 56 colorectal tumors (6 colorectal adenoma, 39 primary colorectal cancers, and 11 liver metastases of colorectal cancer) from 54 patients randomly selected by the database coordinator between 1999 and 2002. Thirteen colorectal normal mucosa were obtained from patients with primary colorectal cancer at surgery. All colorectal tumor specimens and colorectal normal mucosa used in the quantitative RT-PCR analysis were collected immediately after colorectal cancer resection, processed under nucleic acid sterile conditions as previously described (31), and stored at 80°C if not immediately processed. Tumor specimens were coded and assayed in a blinded manner.
Small interfering RNA transfection. The Akt small interfering RNA (siRNA) was obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). The Akt siRNA inhibits expression of both Akt1 and Akt2. Silencer-negative control siRNA (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX) was used as control to show that transfection does not induce nonspecific effects on gene expression. Lamin siRNA was used as a positive control. DLD1 and SW480 cells were transfected with the Akt siRNA or negative control siRNA by lipofection (LipofectAMINE Reagent, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Cells (105) were plated on a 24-well culture plates and incubated in 0.4 mL of Opti-MEM with 4 µL of LipofectAMINE and Akt siRNA or negative control siRNA at a final concentration of 50 nmol/L for 10 hours. After incubation, medium was changed to RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum. At 48 hours after transfection, the medium was changed to serum-free RPMI 1640 to render the cells quiescent for 4 hours, and the cells were stimulated with recombinant human HGF (40 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) for 3 hours. After the stimulation with the HGF, total cellular RNA was extracted and processed for quantitative RT-PCR. siRNA for human C-Met (Dharmacon Research, Inc., Lafayette, CO) was transfected into DLD1 cells (105) with LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Assays were done as described for Akt siRNA. For proliferation studies, cells were grown in six-well cell culture plates, transfected with C-Met siRNA, and then treated with HGF 24 hours. Controls were cells not transfected with siRNA, cells only transfected with siRNA and not treated with HGF, cells not transfected with siRNA and HGF treated, cells transfected with lamin siRNA and HGF treated, and cells transfected with a scrambled siRNA and HGF treated. For counting cells were harvested by trypsinization and then counted with a hemacytometer in duplicates under the microscope. The assays were done twice.
RNA isolation. Total cellular RNA from cell lines, normal epithelium, and colorectal tumor specimens was extracted and purified using Tri-Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH) as previously described (30, 31). All RNA extractions were done in designated sterile laminar flow hood using RNase/DNase-free laboratory ware. RNA was quantified and assessed for purity by UV spectrophotometry and RIBOGreen detection assay (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Tissue processing, RNA extraction, and quantitative RT-PCR assay setup were done in separate designated rooms to prevent cross-contamination, as previously reported (30, 31).
Synthesis of primers and probes. Using the Oligo Primer Analysis Software, version 6.0 (National Biomedical systems, Plymouth, MN), we selected primer and probe sequences to optimally hybridize and amplify target cDNA for quantitative RT-PCR assay. To avoid possible amplification of contaminating genomic DNA, primers were designed so that each PCR product covered at least one intron. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe sequences were as follows: XIAP, 5'-ACTGAAGAGCAGCTAAGGCGCCTG-3'; survivin, 5'-CCGGAGCGGATGGCCGAGGCTGGC-3'; livin, 5'-TGAGCTGCCCACACCCAGGAGAG-3'; C-Met, 5'-TGGGAGCTGATGACAAGAGGAG-3'; Akt1, 5'-AGCATGGAGTGTGTGGACAGCGAG-3'; Akt2, 5'-TGAAGTCGCTCACACAGTCACCGAG-3'; glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 5'-CAGCAATGCCTCCTGCACCACCAA-3'. GAPDH was used as an internal reference housekeeping gene for the quality of all specimen mRNA assessed, as previously described (30). All specimens assessed were determined to have high integrity of mRNA for PCR studies.
Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR assay. All reverse transcriptase reactions were done using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI) with oligo-dT priming as previously described (30, 31). The quantitative RT-PCR assay was done in the iCycler iQ Real-time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) using cDNA from 250 ng of total RNA for each reaction (30). Samples were amplified with a precycling hold at 95°C for 10 minutes followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 minute, annealing at 55°C for 1 minute, and extension at 72°C for 1 minute for XIAP, survivin, C-Met, and GAPDH (annealing at 58°C for livin), and extension at 72°C for 1 minute.
A standard curve for quantifying mRNA copy number was established by amplifying nine aliquots of templates with known copy numbers (100 to 108 copies; refs. 5, 30). The known templates are plasmids constructed with cDNA synthesized by reverse transcription, amplified by PCR, run on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and then extracted using the QIAquick gel extraction method (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The cDNA was ligated into the pCR II-TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA), clones were transformed into Escherichia coli DH5-
cells, and cultures were expanded (5, 30). Plasmids containing the target gene were purified and quantified for use in the quantitative RT-PCR setup. To confirm the correct size of the inserted PCR product, plasmids were digested with specific restriction enzymes, and the cDNA clone PCR products were then verified on gel electrophoresis.
The PCR amplification of the serially diluted cDNA standard templates of each marker showed a logarithmic signal increase (5, 30). Standard curves were generated for each marker by using the threshold cycle (Ct) of templates in known numbers of copies. The Ct of each sample was plotted on the standard curve, and the mRNA copy number was calculated by the iCycler iQ Real-time Detection System Software (Bio-Rad Laboratories) as previously described (5). For each assay, the standard templates, three established colorectal cancer cell lines (HT-29, SW480, and DLD-1; ref. 5), four standard normal controls (normal healthy donor peripheral blood lymphocytes from noncancer patients; refs. 5, 30), and reagent controls (reagent alone without RNA or cDNA) for quantitative RT-PCR assay were included. All assays were optimized for individual markers, and reproducibility verified with patients' specimens. Each assay was repeated at least twice to verify the results, and the mean mRNA copy number was used for analysis. The mRNA expression of each gene was normalized with GAPDH mRNA expression. Final data analysis was done using the ratio of mRNA copy number of target mRNA to GAPDH mRNA copy number.
Immunohistochemistry. Expression of XIAP, survivin, livin, and C-Met in colorectal cancer cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry as previously described (5). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks (
5 years old) retrieved from Surgical Pathology were used in the study. Freshly cut 5-µm sections were mounted on slides and then deparaffinized in xylene. The slides were incubated in Target Retrieval Solution (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) at 95°C for 20 minutes for survivin and livin; for C-Met, the slides were incubated in 0.01 mol/L sodium citrate and heated in a microwave oven for 12 minutes. The sections were incubated and kept at 4°C overnight with monoclonal mouse anti-human XIAP antibody (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) at a dilution of 1:200, polyclonal goat anti-human survivin antibody (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), rabbit anti-human livin polyclonal IgG antibody (1:100; Alpha Diagnostics International, Inc., San Antonio, TX), or polyclonal rabbit anti-human C-Met antibody (1:200; Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA). Pathologically verified metastatic malignant melanoma specimens were used as positive controls (5). Negative control slides were treated with nonimmunized goat or rabbit or mouse IgG under equivalent conditions as the assay specimens and with no primary antibody. For the secondary developing reagents, a labeled streptavidin-biotin kit (DAKO) was used. Slides were developed with diaminobenzaminidine and counterstained with hematoxylin. Histopathology was reviewed by two reviewers.
Statistical analysis. To investigate the association between each mRNA expression and clinicopathologic variables, ANOVA and Student's t test were used. Spearman correlation coefficient analysis was used to assess the relation among each marker mRNA expressions. All Ps = 0.05, using two-sided analysis, were considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Additional experiments were done to determine the effect of siRNA C-Met transfection on HGF treatment on cell growth. DLD-1 cells after HGF treatment showed an increase of 15% cell growth in 24 hours. However, this growth was abolished in C-Met siRNA-transfected cells treated with HGF. Control cell cultures did not show any significant changes. The studies with C-Met siRNA support the pathway mechanism of the HGF/C-Met/Akt/XIAP activation as we hypothesized. The results indicate that HGF activates the Akt pathway and induces XIAP expression in colorectal cancer cell lines that overexpress C-Met. Inhibition of Akt1 and Akt2 expression by siRNA suppressed XIAP mRNA expression, which is activated through the HGF/C-Met/Akt pathway.
C-Met mRNA expression in normal and adenoma and colorectal cancer tumors. We examined human normal, benign, and colorectal cancer specimens to determine if the in vitro observation in cell lines of IAP expression, particularly XIAP up-regulation, was related to colorectal cancer tumor development and progression. To assess C-Met expression, we used a quantitative mRNA assay as a biomarker surrogate of gene expression in tissues. Initially, C-Met expression was analyzed to assess the overall expression levels relative to colorectal normal mucosa, colorectal adenoma, and colorectal cancer specimens. C-Met mRNA expression was detectable by quantitative RT-PCR in 12 of 13 (92%) normal colon mucosal tissues, 5 of 6 (83%) adenomas, and in 50 of 50 (100%) colorectal cancer specimens. The C-Met mRNA expression level in colorectal cancer specimens was significantly higher than that of colorectal normal mucosa tissues (colorectal normal mucosa versus all colorectal cancer specimens, P < 0.0001; colorectal normal mucosa versus T1/T2 tumor, P = 0.03). Colorectal adenoma showed different levels of C-Met mRNA expression (colorectal adenoma versus all colorectal cancer, P = 0.06). C-Met mRNA expression levels significantly correlated with the depth of tumor invasion (T level: T1/T2 versus T3/T4, P = 0.02; Fig. 5A). However, the C-Met expression in liver metastases was not significantly different from primary colorectal cancer tumors. C-Met mRNA copy levels in N1/N2 cases were significantly higher than N0 cases (P = 0.05; Fig. 5A). The analyses showed that C-Met overexpression was related to primary tumor development and progression. Identifying this pattern then allowed us to proceed to determine if IAP expression followed a similar pattern of up-regulation.
|
Other IAP family members survivin and livin were then examined in colorectal normal mucosa, colorectal adenoma, and colorectal cancer tissues to determine if an up-regulation trend similar to that of XIAP also exists. Survivin mRNA expression was detectable by quantitative RT-PCR assay in 66 of 69 (96%) specimens. The survivin mRNA expression level in colorectal normal mucosa was significantly lower than that from colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer (colorectal normal mucosa versus all colorectal cancer, P < 0.0001; colorectal normal mucosa versus colorectal adenoma, P = 0.009; colorectal normal mucosa versus T1/T2 tumor, P = 0.0002; Fig. 5C). However, there were no differences in survivin mRNA expression among colorectal adenoma, colorectal cancer primary tumors, and liver metastases. Survivin mRNA expression level did not correlate with either T level or N factor (Fig. 5C). This indicated that there was no observable trend of increase in survivin expression as related to colorectal cancer and pathology stage. Livin mRNA expression was detectable by quantitative RT-PCR assay in 61 of 69 (88%) specimens. The livin mRNA expression level in colorectal normal mucosa was significantly lower than that from colorectal adenoma (colorectal normal mucosa versus colorectal adenoma, P = 0.02; Fig. 5D). However, there were no significant differences in livin mRNA expression among colorectal adenoma, colorectal cancer primary tumors, and liver metastases. Livin mRNA expression level did not correlate with T level or N factor (Fig. 5D). The results showed that livin mRNA expression does not significantly change with colorectal cancer progression.
To determine whether our in vitro observations on C-Met activation were related to XIAP up-regulation, we assessed the correlation of expression of these genes in colorectal cancer tumors. The C-Met mRNA expression level was significantly correlated with XIAP mRNA expression level in all colorectal tissues (P < 0.0001) and colorectal cancer tumors (P = 0.0005; Fig. 6A and B). There was a significant correlation of C-Met mRNA expression with survivin mRNA expression when data from all colon tissues were assessed together. However, results from colorectal cancer alone did not show significant correlation of C-Met mRNA expression to survivin mRNA level (data not shown). The C-Met mRNA expression level did not correlate with livin mRNA expression level (data not shown). These analyses strongly suggest up-regulation of C-Met correlates with XIAP up-regulation in colorectal cancer tissues. The results also suggest that survivin and livin are not directly related to C-Met activation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the three IAP members, only XIAP mRNA expression was significantly increased by HGF stimulation in colorectal cancer cell lines and was blocked by inactivation of Akt by Akt siRNA. The results suggest that the transcription of XIAP is regulated by HGF/C-Met pathway via Akt1 and Akt2 activation in colorectal cancer cells. XIAP plays an important role in cell survival and antiapoptosis against antitumor drugs in colorectal cancer cells. Moreover, the findings on XIAP up-regulation of expression in colorectal cancer specimens support our in vitro results. We showed XIAP mRNA overexpression as a potential molecular marker associated with liver and lymph node metastasis. XIAP is likely to be involved in both colorectal cancer development and tumor progression including metastasis. Overexpression of this gene would facilitate antiapoptosis and promote cell survival.
HGF has been known to activate Akt via the C-Met signaling pathway (8, 35). Recent studies have shown that activated Akt (phosphorylated Akt) negatively regulates apoptotic pathways (36, 37). In particular, Dan et al. (37) showed similar results to our in vitro study; our results and other studies indicate that XIAP is a direct posttranscriptional downstream target of Akt and an important mediator of Akt on cell survival. siRNA against Akt1 and Akt2 lowered the amount of active (phosphorylated) Akt in vitro (3739). In recent studies, other groups have shown by in vitro studies the role of HGF activation via C-Met on Akt and XIAP (40, 41). Our in vitro results support that HGF/C-Met pathway activates antiapoptosis via Akt and XIAP activation. In support of this, we showed that C-Met siRNA transfection of colorectal cancer cells significantly abrogated C-Met expression and HGF effect on up-regulation of XIAP, Akt1, and Akt2. Other growth factors may be involved in regulating XIAP (42). Further studies are needed to assess other growth factors and signaling pathways independent of the HGF/C-Met pathway.
The transcription level of other IAP members, such as survivin, was not significantly affected by HGF stimulation and Akt siRNA. The results suggest that signal pathways other than HGF/C-Met pathway may affect survivin transcription levels (43, 44). Kim et al. (43) reported that survivin transcription is regulated by APC/T-cell factor/ß-catenin pathway, which is activated in development of colorectal cancer. Survivin mRNA expression levels in colorectal cancer tumors were significantly higher than normal epithelium. However, survivin mRNA expression level in colorectal cancer tumors did not correlate with any clinicopathologic factors. Interestingly, adenomas also expressed survivin mRNA similar to colorectal cancer. Activation of survivin may play a more important role in the development of colorectal cancer than in tumor progression. Yang et al. (17) reported that coexistence of high levels of XIAP and survivin plays anti-apoptotic functions in tumor cell lines. Our results also suggest that XIAP and survivin may cooperatively regulate cell survival and anti-apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells.
Livin is expressed in colorectal cancer tumors, but its role in colorectal cancer tumors however, its functional role, is not well known (28). In this study, livin mRNA expression was not significantly changed by HGF stimulation or Akt inactivation by Akt siRNA. The livin mRNA expression level in colorectal cancer tumors did not correlate with any clinicopathologic factors, suggesting its limited role in colorectal cancer progression.
In summary, we have shown that XIAP expression is related to colorectal normal mucosa, colorectal adenoma, and colorectal cancer progression, and that XIAP up-regulation is through the HGF/C-Met/Akt pathway. The studies showed that IAP up-regulation, particularly XIAP, plays an important role in colorectal cancer development and progression. We showed XIAP mRNA overexpression as a potential molecular marker associated with lymph node metastasis and C-Met mRNA expression. Our in vitro results showed that XIAP, among the three IAP members, was the main downstream target of Akt, which was activated by HGF/C-Met signaling. To our knowledge, this is the first study to determine the three IAP mRNA expression levels in colorectal normal mucosa, colorectal adenoma, and colorectal cancer tissues. The XIAP mRNA expression in primary colorectal cancer may be a useful molecular indicator for regional lymph node metastasis and tumor progression. Further studies on the biological behavior of the colorectal cancer tumors involving XIAP may lead to the development of new targeted therapy inhibiting this HGF/C-Met signal pathway.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 3/ 2/05; revised 7/18/05; accepted 8/ 5/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B-regulated X-chromosome-linked IAP gene expression protects endothelial cells from tumor necrosis factor
-induced apoptosis. J Exp Med 1998;188:2116.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. F. Amersi, A. M. Terando, Y. Goto, R. A. Scolyer, J. F. Thompson, A. N. Tran, M. B. Faries, D. L. Morton, and D. S.B. Hoon Activation of CCR9/CCL25 in Cutaneous Melanoma Mediates Preferential Metastasis to the Small Intestine Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 638 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kanayama, T. Takahara, Y. Yata, F. Xue, E. Shinno, K. Nonome, H. Kudo, K. Kawai, T. Kudo, Y. Tabuchi, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor promotes colonic epithelial regeneration via Akt signaling Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): G230 - G239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shrader, M. S. Pino, L. Lashinger, M. Bar-Eli, L. Adam, C. P.N. Dinney, and D. J. McConkey Gefitinib Reverses TRAIL Resistance in Human Bladder Cancer Cell Lines via Inhibition of AKT-Mediated X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Expression Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 67(4): 1430 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Chang and A. D. Schimmer Livin/melanoma inhibitor of apoptosis protein as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of malignancy Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2007; 6(1): 24 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. LaCasse, G. G. Cherton-Horvat, K. E. Hewitt, L. J. Jerome, S. J. Morris, E. R. Kandimalla, D. Yu, H. Wang, W. Wang, R. Zhang, et al. Preclinical Characterization of AEG35156/GEM 640, a Second-Generation Antisense Oligonucleotide Targeting X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 12(17): 5231 - 5241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |