This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Caballero, D. Articles by San Miguel, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Caballero, D. Articles by San Miguel, J.

Allogeneic Transplant with Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimens may Overcome the Poor Prognosis of B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Unmutated Immunoglobulin Variable Heavy-Chain Gene and Chromosomal Abnormalities (11q– and 17p–)

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; ² Hospital Puerta de Hierro, ³ Hospital 12 de Octubre de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ⁴ Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, ⁵ Institut Catalá d'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain; ⁶ Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol de Badalona, Badalona, Spain; ⁷ Hospital de la Seguridad Social de Jerez de la Frontera, Andalusia, Spain; and ⁸ Hospital La Fe de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Requests for reprints: Dolores Caballero, Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Paseo de San Vicente s/n 37007, Salamanca, Spain. Phone: 34-923291316; Fax: 011-34-923294624; E-mail: cabarri{at}usal.es.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Patients and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic transplant in 30 patients with poor-prognosis chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and/or high-risk molecular/cytogenetic characteristics.

Experimental Design: Eighty-three percent of patients had active disease at the moment of transplant. That is, 14 of the 23 patients analyzed (60%) had unmutated immunoglobulin variable heavy-chain gene (IgV_H) status; 8 of 25 patients (32%) had 11q–, with four of them also displaying unmutated IgV_H; and six (24%) had 17p– (five were also unmutated).

Results: After a median follow-up of 47.3 months, all 22 patients alive are disease free; overall survival and event-free survival (EFS) at 6 years were 70% and 72%, respectively. According to molecular/cytogenetic characteristics, overall survival and EFS for unmutated CLL and/or with 11q– aberration (n = 13) were 90% and 92%, respectively, not significantly different to those with normal in situ hybridization, 13q– and +12, or mutated CLL (n = 7). All six patients with 17p deletion were transplanted with active disease, including three with refractory disease; all except one reached complete remission after the transplant and two are alive and disease free. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 20%; more than two lines before transplant is an independent prognostic factor for NRM (P = 0,02), EFS (P = 0.02), and overall survival (P = 0.01). Patients older than 55 years have a higher risk of NRM (hazard ratio, 12.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-111). Minimal residual disease was monitored by multiparametric flow cytometry in 21 patients. Clearance of CD79/CD5/CD19/CD23 cells in bone marrow was achieved in 68% and 94% of the patients at days 100 and 360, respectively.

Conclusion: According to these results, RIC allogeneic transplant could overcome the adverse prognosis of patients with unmutated CLL as well as those with 11q– or 17p–.

To improve this dismal outcome in young B-CLL patients with poor prognosis, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been increasingly used over recent years. Although some data suggests a survival benefit of ASCT over conventional therapy, its advantage for patients with unmutated CLL is controversial (8–12). Moreover, for patients with both unmutated IgV_H and chromosomal abnormalities (11q– and 17p), ASCT does not seem to offer any beneficial effect (12, 13). In addition, patients with advanced-stage or active B-CLL at the time of SCT, as well as those with an interval between diagnosis and transplant longer than 36 months, are associated with a poorer outcome (11). Finally, whereas there is no evidence that ASCT could cure CLL patients, long-term follow-up reports show that allogeneic transplant is able to cure some B-CLL patients, although the overall mortality of this strategy ranges between 30% and 60% (11, 14–18).

Several groups of researchers have confirmed the feasibility of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in different hematological malignancies, but experience in B-CLL is scanty (19–22). Moreover, the efficacy of this approach in B-CLL patients with unfavorable biological features still needs to be verified (23).

We report here on the efficacy of RIC allogeneic related transplant in a group of 30 B-CLL patients, with adverse clinical and/or biological prognostic factors.

	Patients and Methods

Top Abstract Patients and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Patients. Between March 1999 and April 2004, 30 consecutive adult patients, with median age of 53 years (range, 35-67 years), underwent allogeneic RIC from an HLA identical sibling at eight transplant centers in Spain. Eligibility criteria for allogeneic RIC required one of the following characteristics: (a) progressive or relapsing disease after two or more lines of chemotherapy, including ASCT; (b) Ritcher syndrome; or (c) symptomatic CLL with one or more of these adverse molecular/cytogenetic factors: unmutated IgV_H, 17p–, 11q–, or complex karyotype. All 30 patients gave written informed consent for inclusion in the transplant program. Two of them have previously been reported elsewhere.

Patients' characteristics are shown in Tables 1 and 2: Seventy-seven percent of the patients were older than 50 years and 10 (33%) were older than 55 years. The median number of previous lines of therapy was 3 (1–8), and 87% had previously received fludarabine or 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine, with early relapse or progression after drugs in 44%. Two patients developed Ritcher syndrome. The interval between diagnosis and transplant was 44 months (range, 6-201). At transplant, 83% of patients had active disease and seven of them (23%) showed refractory progressive. Seven patients were transplanted after one line of chemotherapy due to the presence of both stage B or C and presence of poor biological factors, such as unmutated CLL (n = 3) or 11q– (n = 4).

Supportive care, grading, and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD were carried out using standard protocols (24, 25).

Biological characteristics. Fourteen of the 23 patients analyzed (60%) had an unmutated IgV_H status; 8 of 25 patients (32%) had 11q– with four of them also displaying unmutated IgV_H; six (24 %) had 17p– aberration (five were also unmutated); two patients had 13q–; one patient 13q– and one monosomy; and one patient with 13q– and +12 aberrations. In four patients, mutational status or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was not available.

Stem cells. All patients received peripheral blood stem cells from a related identical donor mobilized with 5 to 10 µg/kg of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The median number of CD34⁺ cells infused was 4.9 x 10⁶/kg (range, 1.9-8.8).

Molecular and minimal residual disease studies. IgV_H identification, sequencing, and mutational analysis as well as chimerism studies were done as previously described (26, 27). For FISH analysis, standard protocols were used (28).

Minimal residual disease (MRD) was studied by multiparametric flow cytometry assay using four-color multiparametric immunophenotyping analysis (CD79/CD5/CD19/CD23), yielding a sensitivity between 10^–3 and 10^–4 (one leukemic cell among 10,000 or 100,000 normal cells, as previously described; ref. 29). Analysis was done on bone marrow before transplant and at days 100, 180, 240, and 360 and later at least every 6 months until the last follow-up.

Assessment of clinical outcome. Data was analyzed as of October 30, 2004. Criteria for disease status at transplant were those proposed by Cheson et al. (30). Post-transplant evaluation was done at day 100 and then every 3 months during the first year and subsequently every 4 to 6 months. Complete remission (CR) after transplant was defined as disappearance of all CD79/CD5/CD19/CD23 clonal B cells from the bone marrow determined by multiparametric flow cytometric analysis (30) as well as regression of all tumor masses by image techniques. GVHD was graded according to published criteria (24, 25).

Statistical analysis. Events analyzed were calculated from the time of transplantation using Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was defined as death due to causes unrelated to the underlying disease. GVHD-related mortality was defined as death due to causes directly related to GVHD, and those deaths attributed to immunosuppression in patients requiring treatment for GVHD were also considered as GVHD-related mortality. Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated from transplant until disease progression or death, and those patients who did not reach disease response (complete or partial remission) any time after transplant were considered events on day 100 because that was the first date for complete disease evaluation. Overall survival was calculated from transplant until death from any cause, and surviving patients were censored at last follow-up.

Patients who showed evidence of engraftment were evaluable for acute GVHD, whereas patients who engrafted and survived >100 days were evaluable for chronic GVHD. The day of acute GVHD was calculated from transplant until diagnosis of acute GVHD among evaluable patients and the same for chronic GVHD. Variables included in the univariate and multivariate analysis for NRM, disease-free survival, EFS, overall survival, and GVHD were age (<55 or >55), status at transplant (chemorefractory or chemosensitive), type of conditioning (containing melphalan versus other), more or less than two lines of chemotherapy before the transplant, interval between diagnosis and transplant longer than 45 months, and development of acute and or chronic GVHD. Biological characteristics for mutational status and FISH aberrations, such as 11q– or 17p–, were also included in the analysis. For this purpose, the two-sided log-rank test was used to test the univariate association between variables and univariate analysis.

Univariate Cox regression was used to analyze the effect of time-dependent variables, such as chronic GVHD, on EFS and overall survival.

All factors that significantly or marginally (P < 0.1) influenced univariate analysis were included in a multivariate analysis using a forward-step Cox regression model.

For most of the statistical analyses, the SPSS software program (SPSS 10.0, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used. Computations and testing of cumulative incidences were carried out with the package cmprsk R 1.9.1. Differences were considered to be statistically significant when P < 0.05.

	Results

Top Abstract Patients and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Hematologic recovery and engraftment. All patients engrafted and they reached >500 granulocytes/mm³ at a mean of 15 days (range, 8-23) and >20,000 platelets/mm³ at a mean of 5 days after transplant (range, 0-29). Complete donor chimerism in bone marrow was observed between days 21 and 28 in 67% of patients, and after day 180 in all except two patients who had previously relapsed.

Response to transplant and outcome. Of the 30 patients included in the study, at the time of transplant according to the Cheson criteria (30), 25 (83%) had active disease, including six with refractory progressive disease. At day 100, considering the 27 evaluable patients, 21 (78%) had achieved CR, five (18%) were on partial remission, and one had stable disease (3%). The three nonevaluable patients had died, two due to NRM (both in CR) and one due to early PGR on day 50. With a median follow-up of 47.3 months (range, 12-74.6), 22 patients are still alive and disease free with an actuarial disease-free survival, EFS, and overall survival at 5 years of 93%, 70%, and 72%, respectively (Fig. 1).

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Fig. 1. Overall and disease-free survival was 70% and 93%, respectively. Nonrelapse and relapse mortality was 22% and 10%, respectively.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Fig. 2. Effect of mutational status and chromosomal abnormalities in overall survival (A) and EFS (B).

In our series, 19 patients developed acute GVHD (12 of them, 40%, grades 2 to 4) at a median of 33 days (range, 17-150) after transplant. Seventeen of 26 evaluable patients developed chronic GVHD at a median of 185 days (range, 85-391), and eight of them developed extensive chronic GVHD for an incidence of 76%. Although GVH had no influence on outcome in the univariate and multivariate analysis, two of five patients who did not developed acute and/or chronic GVH died due to progressive disease, whereas no progressions were observed between those with GVH. Neither incidence of acute or chronic GVHD was significantly influenced by age, type of conditioning (melphalan versus other), number of lines of chemotherapy, or disease status at transplant.

Patients who received more than two lines had an EFS significantly worse than those who received two or less (53% versus 92%; P = 0.02). This variable also had a significant influence on the multivariate analysis in overall survival (54% versus 90% at 6 years; hazard ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-71; P = 0.01). Neither type of conditioning nor in vivo T-cell depletion with Campath, antithymocyte globulin, or GVH prophylaxis influenced EFS or overall survival in the univariate and multivariate analysis.

Minimal residual disease follow-up. In 21 of the 25 patients transplanted with active disease, kinetic of response was analyzed by clearance of CD79/CD5⁺/CD19⁺/CD23 cells from bone marrow by multiparametric flow cytometry. Sixty-five percent of the patients were in immunophenotypical remission at day 100; this percentage increases to 94% at day 360 (four patients reach CR on days 180, one patient on day 240, and one on day 360). In 90% of the patients, response was time related to the appearance of acute and or chronic GVHD. Regarding kinetic of response in the present study, although 35% of the patients still had CD79/CD5/CD19/CD23 leukemic cells in the bone marrow at day 100, none of them have relapsed. Interestingly, all of them developed chronic GVHD later on, and leukemic cells clearance occurred in a close time frame. The evolution of a 45-year-old male (patient 8, Table 2) with stage C unmutated and 11q– CLL refractory to fludarabine and transplanted with progressive disease (60 x 10⁹ lymphocytes and huge hepatosplenomegaly), who received melphalan and fludarabine as conditioning, underlines the efficacy of this strategy and the graft-versus-tumor effect on eradication of MRD. At discharge at day 21, CD79/CD19/CD5/CD23 cells have decreased from 79% to 3%, but hepatosplenomegaly were almost similar. At day 42, he developed biopsy-proven skin grade 2 acute GVH, which was controlled with cyclosporine and topical steroids. At that moment, visceromegaly started to decrease, and at day 150, they had disappeared, as well as bone marrow infiltration (Fig. 3). Patient has not developed chronic GVH and he remained in CR with MRD negative from 20 months onwards.

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Fig. 3. Clearance of CD5/CD19 coexpression cells from peripheral blood in one patient with a well-defined cell population before transplant. Time intervals were measured from the day of transplant until the first negative result.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Patients and Methods Results Discussion References

These results are at least similar to those recently reported (31) in a series of 30 patients with similar clinical characteristics but a shorter follow-up (24 months); in this series, at last follow-up 52% of the 23 patients still alive were in CR, whereas in our series, all 22 patients still alive were event free at the last follow-up, with a median follow-up of 47.3 (range, 12-74.6 months). Overall, the results from these two studies are superior to those reported for ASCT, thereby suggesting that, in the allogeneic transplantation setting, graft-versus-tumor effect plays a key role for disease control (11–13). Moreover, the lower NRM of RIC, compared with conventional allogeneic treatment, indicates that the former could be the treatment of choice for high-risk CLL patients (11, 14–18). Furthermore, in a recent Spanish comparative study (30 RIC versus 30 conventional allogeneic treatment), no differences were observed in terms of NRM, relapse rate, EFS, or overall survival between either group, although age was significantly higher in the RIC group (53 versus 45 years, respectively; ref. 32). In another retrospective comparative study, Dreger et al. (33) have recently reported a similar EFS and overall survival but with a higher relapse rate in the RIC group (28% versus 11%); in our series, with a longer follow-up (47 months), the relapse rate is inferior (7%), suggesting that myeloablative conditioning is not necessary in CLL.

Although unmutated CLL remains as a poor prognostic factor after high-dose therapy and ASCT (12, 13), recently, two articles have reported that allogeneic transplant may overcome this dismal prognosis (23, 34). The article from Ritgen et al. (23) also suggests that myeloablative conditioning is not necessary for unmutated CLL. Our results in a larger series of patients and with a longer follow-up confirm this hypothesis.. However, up to now, efficacy of RIC allogeneic transplant in patients with 11q– or with the poorest group with 17p– aberrations has not been tested. In our series, all six 17p– patients were transplanted with active disease. Apart from one patient, all achieved CR indicating the efficacy of this strategy. In the six patients, type of conditioning regimen seems to influence outcome. Thus, the five patients who reached CR after transplant had received melphalan plus fludarabine, one of them with Campath-1H, and this was the patient who developed a post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. The only patient who progressed had received the less intensive regimen (fludarabine plus low-dose total body irradiation), suggesting that in this high-risk group, "intermediate" chemotherapy could initially help to control disease while the immune system induces an adequate response. At present, two patients are alive and disease free (37 and 55 months after transplant), and three died in CR between 3.8 and 8 months after transplant. It is important to point out that the median age for 17p– patients was 58 years and the number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 4, both characteristics associated with a significantly higher risk of NRM in our series, as shown below. Although numbers are very small, our data would suggest that 17p– patients could reach long-term disease-free survival after RIC allogeneic transplant. The recommendation in this particular poor-risk subgroup would be to do the transplant in an early phase of the disease, avoiding patient exposure to excessive lines of chemotherapy.

The mortality rate observed in this study is similar to the NRM reported by Dreger et al. in a retrospective European Bone Marrow Transplantation study (33). Efforts should be made to decrease the NRM while maintaining the efficacy. Two recent studies have reported lower NRM rates with RIC, including fludarabine, melphalan plus CAMPATH 1H (35), or cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine and rituximab (36).

In contrast with what we have observed in previous studies in patients with multiple myeloma and myeloid disorders (37–39), in the present study, we did not find a significant influence of chronic GVHD on outcome probably due to the small number of events. However, it is clear that the acquisition of CR was time related to the appearance of acute and or chronic GVH in most of the patients.

Regarding kinetics of response in the present study, although 35% of the patients still had CD79/CD5/CD19/CD23 leukemic cells in the bone marrow at day 100, none of them have relapsed. Interestingly, all of them developed chronic GVHD later on, and leukemic cell clearance occurred in a close time frame. This pattern is different from that observed after ASCT, where persistence of MRD determined by molecular biology or by cytometric assays are synonymous with relapse (24, 40). Previous data from Rawstron et al. have already suggested that eradication of B-CLL cells after autologous transplantation or Campath-1H treatment could have an effect on EFS and overall survival in CLL (41, 42). Regarding other MRD techniques, a recent comparative study among consensus IgH-PCR, quantitative PCR, and flow cytometry assay after autologous and allogeneic transplant in CLL shows that whereas the three techniques are equally suitable in allogeneic transplant, quantitative allele-specific oligonucleotide-PCR detects relapses after autologous transplant earlier (43).

In summary, our study, with a longer follow-up than previously reported, confirms the efficacy of RIC allogeneic transplant in CLL with adverse biological prognostic factors, such as unmutated status, and, for the first time, shows additional efficacy in patients with 11q– and 17p– aberrations.

	Acknowledgments

 
We thank Marck Anderson for English style supervision.

	Footnotes

 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 5/ 2/05; revised 7/ 7/05; accepted 8/ 5/05.

	References

Top Abstract Patients and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Perkins JG, Flynn JM, Howard RS, Byrd JC. Frequency and type of serious infections in fludarabine-refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma. Cancer 2002;94:2033–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
2. Keating MJ, O'Brien S, Lerner S, et al. Long term follow-up of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) receiving fludarabine regimens as initial therapy. Blood 1998;92:1165–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Dohner H, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, et al. Genomic aberrations and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1910–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Krober A, Seiler T, Benner A, et al. V(H) mutation status, CD38 expression level, genomic aberrations and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Blood 2002;100:1410–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Hamblin TJ, Orchard JA, Ibbotson RE, et al. CD 38 expression and immunoglobulin variable region mutations are independent prognostic variables in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, but CD38 expression may vary during the course of the disease. Blood 2002;99:1023–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Crespo M, Bosch F, Villamor N, et al. ZAP-70 expression surrogate for immunoglobulin-variable-region mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1764–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Shanafelt TD, Geyer M, Kay NE. Prognosis at diagnosis: integrating molecular biologic insights into clinical practice for patients with CLL. Blood 2004;103:1202–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Rabinowe SN, Soiffer RJ, Gribben JG, et al. Autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for poor prognosis patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Blood 1993;82:1366–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Khouri IF, Keating MJ, Vriesendorp HM, et al. Autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: preliminary results. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:748–58.[Abstract]
10. Dreger P, von Neuhoff N, Kuse R, et al. Early stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a chance for cure? Br J Cancer 1998;77:2291–7.[Medline]
11. Dreger P, Montserrat E. Autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Leukemia 2002;16:985–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Ritgen M, Lange A, Stilgenbauer S, et al. Unmutated immunoglobulin variable heavy chain gene status remains and adverse prognostic factor after autologous stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Blood 2003;101:2049–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Dreger P, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, et al. The prognostic impact of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a risk-matched analysis based on the VH gene mutational status. Blood 2004;103:2850–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Jarque I, Palau J, Sanz GF, et al. Delayed complete response after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1993;82:1036–7.[Free Full Text]
15. Michallet M, Archimbaud E, Bandini G, et al. HLA identical sibling bone marrow transplantation in younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:311–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Khouri IF, Przepiorka D, van Besien K, et al. Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia timing of transplantation and potential effect of fludarabine on acute graft versus host disease. Br J Haematol 1997;9:466–73.
17. Khouri IF, Keating MJ, Saliba RM, Champlin RE. Long term follow-up of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Cytotherapy 2001;4:217–23.
18. Michallet M, Michallet AS, Bandini G, et al. Conventional HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation is able to cure chronic lymphocytyc leukemia. A study from the EBMT and IBMT Registries. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004;33:611p.
19. Giralt S, Estey E, Albitar M, et al. Engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells with purine analog-containing chemotherapy: harnessing graft versus leukemia without myeloablative therapy. Blood 1997;89:4531–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Slavin S, Nagler A, Naparstek E, et al. Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytoreduction for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. Blood 2001;91:756–63.
21. McSweeney PA, Niederwieser D, Shizuru JA, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation in older patients with hematologic malignancies: replacing high dose cytotoxic therapy with graft versus tumor effect. Blood 2001;97:3390–400.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Martino R, Caballero MD, Canals C, et al. ALLOPBSCT Subcommittee of the Spanish Group for Haematopoietic Transplantation (GETH); Group GEL-TAMO. Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning: results of a prospective multicenter study. Br J Haematol 2001;115:653–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Ritgen M, Stilgenbauer S, von Neuhoff N, et al. Graft-versus-leukemia activity may overcome therapeutic resistance of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with unmutated immunoglobulin variable heavy-chain gene status: implications of minimal residual disease measurement with quantitative PCR. Blood 2004;104:2600–2.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995;15:825–8.[Medline]
25. Akpek G, Zahurak ML, Piantadosi S, et al. Development of a prognostic model for grading chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2001;97:1219–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Pérez-Simón JA, Caballero D, Diez-Campelo M, et al. Chimerism and minimal residual disease monitoring after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic transplantation. Leukemia 2002;16:1423–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. González D, Balanzategui A, García-Sanz R, et al. Incomplete DJH rearrangements of the IgH gene are frequent in multiple myeloma patients: immunobiological characteristics and clinical implications. Leukemia 2003;17:1398–403.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Hernández JM, González MB, Granada I, et al. Detection of inv(16) and t(16;16) by fluorescence in situ hybridization in acute myeloid leukemia M4Eo. Haematologica 2000;85:481–5.[Medline]
29. Sánchez ML, Almeida J, Vidriales B, et al. Incidence of phenotypic aberrations in a series of 467 patients with B chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: basis for the design of specific four-color staining to be used for minimal residual disease investigation. Leukemia 2002;16:1460–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Grever M, et al. National Cancer Institute-sponsored working group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood 1996;87:4990–7.[Free Full Text]
31. Schetelig J, Thiede C, Bornhauser M, et al. Cooperative German Transplant Study Group. Evidence of a graft-versus-leukemia effect in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia after reduced-intensity conditioning and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: the cooperative German transplant study group. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2747–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Caballero MD, García-Marco JA, Martino R, et al. Allogeneic transplant in patients with poor prognosis B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL): comparative study between myeloablative (M) and non-myeloablative (NM) conditioning regimen. Blood 2004;104:Abstract 2306.
33. Dreger P, Brand R, Milligan D, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning lowers treatment-related mortality of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a population-matched analysis. Leukemia 2005;19:1029.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Moreno C, Villamor N, Colomer D, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplant may overcome the adverse prognosis of unmutated VH genes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3433–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Pérez-Simón JA, Kottaridis PD, Martino R, Craddock C, Caballero D, Chopra R. Non myeloablative transplantation with or without Campath 1H: comparison between 2 prospective studies in patients with lymphoid disorders. Blood 2002;100:3121–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Khouri IF, Lee MS, Saliba RM, et al. Nonablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: impact of rituximab on immunomodulation and survival. Exp Hematol 2004;32:28–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Perez-Simon JA, Martino R, Alegre A, et al. Chronic but not acute graft-versus-host disease improves outcome in multiple myeloma patients after non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation. Br J Haematol 2003;121:104–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Martino R, Caballero MD, Simon JA, et al. AML and alloPBSCT Subcommittees of the Spanish Group for Hematopoietic Transplantation.: evidence for a graft-versus-leukemia effect after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning in acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2002;100:2243–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Pérez-Simón JA, Diez-Campelo M, Martino R, et al. Impact of CD34⁺ cell dose on the outcome of patients undergoing reduced-intensity-conditioning allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Blood 2003;102:1108–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Esteve J, Villamor N, Colomer D, Montserrat E. Different clinical value of minimal residual disease after autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2002;99:1873–4.[Free Full Text]
41. Rawstron AC, Kennedy B, Evans PA, et al. Quantification of minimal residual disease levels in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia using a sensitive flow cytrometric assay improve the prediction of outcome and can be used to optimise therapy. Blood 2001;98:29–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Rawstron AC, Kennedy B, Moreton P, et al. Early prediction of outcome and response to alemtuzumab therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Blood 2004;103:2027–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Bottcher S, Ritgen M, Pott C, et al. Comparative analysis of minimal residual disease detection using four-colour flow cytometry, consensus IgH-PCR, and quantitative IgH PCR in CLL after allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2004;18:1637–45.[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Schetelig, A. van Biezen, R. Brand, D. Caballero, R. Martino, M. Itala, J. A. Garcia-Marco, L. Volin, N. Schmitz, R. Schwerdtfeger, et al. Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With 17p Deletion: A Retrospective European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Analysis J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2008; 26(31): 5094 - 5100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Sorror, B. E. Storer, B. M. Sandmaier, M. Maris, J. Shizuru, R. Maziarz, E. Agura, T. R. Chauncey, M. A. Pulsipher, P. A. McSweeney, et al. Five-Year Follow-Up of Patients With Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated With Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation After Nonmyeloablative Conditioning J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2008; 26(30): 4912 - 4920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hallek, B. D. Cheson, D. Catovsky, F. Caligaris-Cappio, G. Dighiero, H. Dohner, P. Hillmen, M. J. Keating, E. Montserrat, K. R. Rai, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines Blood, June 15, 2008; 111(12): 5446 - 5456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Kater, M. H. J. van Oers, and T. J. Kipps Cellular immune therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia Blood, October 15, 2007; 110(8): 2811 - 2818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Caballero, D. Articles by San Miguel, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Caballero, D. Articles by San Miguel, J.