Clinical Cancer Research Meeting Calendar Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Noguchi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Noguchi, S.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 11, 1380-1385, February 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Human Cancer Biology

Down-Regulation of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA Expression by Promoter Hypermethylation and Its Association with Biologically Aggressive Phenotype in Human Breast Cancers

Yuri Takahashi, Yasuo Miyoshi, Chie Takahata, Natsumi Irahara, Tetsuya Taguchi, Yasuhiro Tamaki and Shinzaburo Noguchi

Department of Surgical Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan

Requests for reprints: Shinzaburo Noguchi, Department of Surgical Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E10 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. Phone: 81-6-6879-3772; Fax: 81-6-6879-3779; E-mail: noguchi{at}onsurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Purpose: LATS1 and LATS2 are tumor suppressor genes implicated in the regulation of cell cycle. Methylation status of the promoter regions of these genes as well as its correlation with their mRNA levels were studied in human breast cancers. Correlation of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels with clinicopathologic characteristics of breast tumors were also studied.

Experimental Design: Methylation status of promoter regions of LATS1 and LATS2 was studied by a methylation-specific PCR and mRNA expression levels of LATS1 and LATS2 were determined by a real-time PCR assay in 30 breast cancers. In addition, correlation of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels with clinicopathologic characteristics was studied in 117 breast cancers.

Results: Methylation-specific PCR showed that of 30 tumors, LATS1 promoter region was hypermethylated in 17 tumors (56.7%) and LATS2 promoter region was hypermethylated in 15 (50.0%) tumors. LATS1 mRNA levels in breast tumors with hypermethylation (2.15 ± 0.37, mean ± SE) were significantly (P < 0.01) lower than those without hypermethylation (6.09 ± 1.38), and LATS2 mRNA levels in breast tumors with hypermethylation (1.42 ± 0.66) were also significantly (P < 0.01) lower than those without hypermethylation (3.10 ± 1.00). The decreased expression of LATS1 or LATS2 mRNA was significantly associated with a large tumor size, high lymph node metastasis, and estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negativity. Furthermore, the decreased expression of LATS1 mRNA, but not LATS2 mRNA, was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with a poor prognosis.

Conclusions: Hypermethylation of the promoter regions of LATS1 and LATS2 likely plays an important role in the down-regulation of their mRNA levels in breast cancers, and breast cancers with a decreased expression of LATS1 or LATS2 mRNA levels have a biologically aggressive phenotype.

Key Words: LATS1 • LATS2 • Hypermethylation • Breast Cancer • Prognosis


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The lats gene, which encodes a putative serine/threonine kinase, has been identified as a tumor suppressor gene in Drosophila (1, 2). Deterioration of the lats gene function results in promotion of cell proliferation and tumor formation in Drosophila (2). Two mammalian homologues of the Drosophila lats, LATS1 and LATS2, have been identified thus far. Because LATS1-deficient mice develop soft tissue sarcomas or ovarian stromal cell tumors, LATS1 has been considered as a tumor suppressor gene (3). The human LATS1 gene has been localized to chromosome 6q24-25 (4). A frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at this locus has been reported in ovarian (5, 6), cervical (7) and breast cancers (8–10). Overexpression of LATS1 causes G2-M arrest through the inhibition of CDC2 kinase activity in breast cancer cell line in vitro (11). Furthermore, overexpression of LATS1 significantly suppresses the tumorigenicity in vivo by inducing apoptosis (11, 12). LATS2 (also known as KPM) was isolated as a second mammalian homologue of the lats tumor suppressor family (13, 14) . The human LATS2 gene was mapped to chromosome 13q11-12 (13). A frequent LOH of this locus has also been reported in various cancers including breast, ovary, and liver (15–17). Overexpression of LATS2 causes G1-S arrest through the inhibition of cyclin E/CDK2 in vitro as well as suppresses the tumorigenicity of NIH/v-ras–transformed cells in vivo, suggesting that LATS2, like LATS1, is a tumor suppressor gene (18).

Inactivation of a typical tumor suppressor gene is induced by mutation of one allele and LOH of the other allele, resulting in the complete loss of the gene function. With respect to LATS1 and LATS2, LOH is frequently observed, as mentioned above, in various human tumors, but no somatic mutation of LATS1 was reported in 25 breast cancers (19) and only one mutation was reported in 60 esophageal tumors in the LATS2 gene (20). These results seem to indicate that loss of function of LATS1 and LATS2 is unlikely to be induced by the combination of somatic mutation and LOH but is more likely to be induced by other mechanisms such as hypermethylation, which has been shown to play an important role in the inactivation of several other tumor suppressor genes (21–23). This speculation seems to be supported by the recent report that showed the hypermethylation of the promoter region of the LATS1 gene in six of seven soft tissue sarcomas with a decreased expression of LATS1 mRNA (24). On the other hand, hypermethylation of the promoter region of the LATS2 gene has never been studied yet in human tumors.

Because all the data thus far obtained on LATS1 and LATS2 strongly indicate that both genes serve as a tumor suppressor gene and hypermethylation might play a significant role in the inactivation of these genes in various human tumors, we have analyzed, in the present study, the methylation status of these genes as well as its correlation with their mRNA levels in human breast cancers. In addition, correlation of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels with clinicopathologic characteristics of breast tumors has also been investigated.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tumor Specimens and Patients. Tumor specimens were obtained at surgery from 117 female patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery at Osaka University Hospital from February 1998 to August 2001. Adjacent, normal breast tissues, which were histologically confirmed as cancer free, were also obtained from 6 patients. Histological diagnosis of breast cancers was obtained in all patients (99 invasive ductal carcinomas, 2 invasive lobular carcinomas, 1 noninvasive ductal carcinoma, and 15 others). The mean age of the patients was 53.1 years (range, 30-83 years). The specimens were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at –80°C. Informed consent was obtained from each patient. Patients had a physical examination every 3 months for 2 years postoperatively, then every 6 months thereafter. Blood test and chest X-ray were obtained every 6 months postoperatively. Seven patients received no adjuvant therapy. Tamoxifen (20 mg/d) was given to 65 patients, goserelin to 3 patients, and both to 6 patients. Six cycles of CMF [cyclophosphamide (100 mg/d p.o., days 1-14) + methotrexate (40 mg/m2 i.v., days 1 and 8) + 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/ m2 i.v., days 1 and 8)] were given to 16 patients, four cycles of CE [cyclophosphamide 600 mg/ m2 i.v. (day 1) + epirubicin 60 mg/ m2 i.v. (day 1)] to 27 patients, four cycles of docetaxel (600 mg/ m2 i.v., day 1) to 18 patients, and other chemotherapies to 3 patients. Twenty-eight patients were treated with hormonal therapy plus chemotherapy. Indication for adjuvant treatment was decided essentially according to St. Gallen recommendations (25, 26). The median follow-up period was 40 months, ranging from 19 to 52 months. Seventeen patients developed recurrences: 5 developed soft tissue metastases, 5 developed bone metastases, 5 developed lung metastases, 3 developed liver metastases, and 2 developed brain metastases. Ipsilateral breast recurrences after breast-conserving surgery were not counted as recurrences.

RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription. Total RNA was extracted from the frozen tumor specimens using TRIZOL reagent according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH). Three micrograms of total RNA were reverse-transcribed for single strand cDNA, using oligo(dT)15 primer and Superscript II (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). Reverse transcription reaction was done at 42°C for 90 minutes followed by heating at 70°C for 10 minutes.

Real-time PCR Assay of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA Levels. Real-time PCR reactions of LATS1 and LATS2 were carried out using the ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The sequence of the probes for LATS1 and LATS2 were 5'-TACTATCAGAGTGGTGACCATCC-3' and 5'-TGCTCCTCCGCAAAGGGTACACTCA-3', respectively. Both probes were labeled by 6-carboxyfluorescein as a reporter. The amplification primer pairs were 5'-TGGTCATATTAAATTGACTGAC-3' and 5'-CCACATCGACAGCTTGAGGG-3' for LATS1, and 5'-TAGAGCAGAGGGCGCGGAAG-3' and 5'-CCAACACTCCACCAGTCACAGA-3' for LATS2. PCR conditions for LATS1 and LATS2 were as follows: after incubation at 50°C for 2 minutes and denaturing at 95°C for 10 minutes, 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 58°C for 30 seconds, and 67°C for 30 seconds. To normalize transcript content in each sample, we used the ß-glucoronidase transcripts as the quantitative control. The primer and probe mixture for ß-glucoronidase was purchased from Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems and used according to the manufacturer's protocol. The standard curves for LATS1, LATS2, and ß-glucoronidase mRNA were generated using serially diluted solutions of plasmid clones inserted with LATS1, LATS2, or ß-glucoronidase cDNA as templates, and the amount of target gene expression was calculated from these standard curves. Finally, mRNA expression levels of LATS1 and LATS2 were shown as ratios to those of ß-glucoronidase. Real-time PCR assays were conducted in duplicate for each sample, and the mean value was used for calculation of the relative expression levels.

Bisulfite Modification and Direct Sequencing. Genomic DNA extracted from tumor tissues and adjacent normal breast tissues was treated by CpGenome DNA modification kit (Serologicals Corporation, Norcross, GA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 1 g of genomic DNA was denatured using 0.2 mol/L NaOH and subsequently incubated with a sodium salt of bisulfite ion (HSO4–) at 50C for 16 hours. Bisulfite-modified DNA was amplified by two sets of primers to amplify the regions A and B including three putative CpG islands of LATS2 promoter region (Fig. 1). The amplification primers were 5'-TTTTGAGATGGAGTTTTGTT-3' and 5'-AATTCAAAACCAACCTAACC-3' for region A, and 5'-TGGTTGTGGAGGAGTAGGG-3' and 5'-CTAAAACTACTACTAACCCC-3' for region B. PCR conditions were as follows: after initial denaturation at 94C for 1 minute, 35 cycles of 94C for 15 seconds, 54C for 30 seconds, and 68C for 30 seconds. Methylated cytosine residues were identified by direct sequencing using ABI PRISM 310 sequencer (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems).



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 1 Schematic representation of LATS2 5' untranslated region and promoter region. Three open boxes (1, 2, and 3) correspond to the putative CpG islands. Arrows, regions (Region A and Region B) that were analyzed in their methylation status as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Closed box shows the highly homologous (81.4%) region between LATS1 and LATS2.

 
Methylation-Specific PCR. The methylation status in the CpG islands of LATS1 and LATS2 promoter regions was determined by methylation-specific PCR (27). The methylation site in the promoter region of LATS1 was previously reported (24). Bisulfite-modified DNA was amplified with primers specific for methylated or unmethylated sequences. The methylated DNA of LATS1 was amplified using M set primers, 5'-GGAGTTTCGTTTTGTC-3' and 5'-CGACGTAATAACGAACGCCTA-3', and the unmethylated DNA of LATS1 was amplified using U set primers, 5'-TAGGTTGGAGTGTGGTGGT-3' and 5'-CCCAACATAATAACAAACACCT-3'. The methylated DNA of LATS2 was amplified using M set primers, 5'-ATTTCGGTTTATTGTAATTTTC-3' and 5'-AACCAACATAATAAAACCCCG-3', and the unmethylated DNA of LATS2 was amplified using U set primers, 5'-TTTGTTTTTTGGGTTTAAGT-3' and 5'-CCAACATAATAAAACCCCA-3'. Methylation-specific PCR reaction of LATS1 was as follows: after initial denaturation at 94°C for 1 minute, 23 cycles (methylated) or 25 cycles (unmethylated) of amplification at 94°C for 15 seconds, 58°C (methylated) or 53°C (unmethylated) for 15 seconds, and 68°C for 30 seconds. Methylation-specific PCR reaction of LATS2 was as follows: after initial denaturation at 94°C for 1 minute, 30 cycles of 94°C for 15 seconds, 58°C (methylated) or 50°C (unmethylated) for 15 seconds, and 68°C for 30 seconds.

Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Assay. Enzyme immunoassay was conducted for the measurement of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor protein levels in breast cancers using the kits provided by Abbott Research Laboratories (Chicago, IL) according to the manufacture's instructions. The cutoff value for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor was 5 fmol/mg protein.

Statistical Methods. LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA expression levels between various groups were evaluated using Mann-Whitney test. The comparison of LATS1 or LATS2 mRNA levels among various tumor sizes or histologic grades was calculated using Kruskal-Wallis test. Relapse-free survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test was used to evaluate the difference in relapse-free survival between the LATS1 mRNA high and low groups and between the LATS2 mRNA high and low groups. Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards model) was conducted to estimate the independence of each prognostic factor. Statistical significance was assumed for P < 0.05.


   RESULTS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Methylation Analysis of LATS1 and LATS2. LATS2 promoter region obtained from the University of California Santa Cruz genome browser contained three putative CpG islands that fulfilled the criteria of observed/expected CpG ratio >0.60 and percent C + percent G >50.00 using the CpG plot program (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools). Then, in order to identify methylation sites, PCR reaction was done using bisulfite-modified DNA by two sets of primers that were designed to amplify the regions A and B including the three putative CpG islands of LATS2 promoter region (Fig. 1). Methylated cytosine residues were identified in region A but not in region B, and the methylation sites in the LATS2 corresponded to the previously reported methylation sites of LATS1. Thus, in the following study on the methylation status of the promoter region of LATS2, only region A was analyzed.

Methylation status of LATS1 and LATS2 were analyzed in 30 breast tumors and 6 adjacent normal breast tissues by methylation-specific PCR. Methylation-specific PCR showed that 17 (56.7%) of 30 breast tumors were hypermethylated in the LATS1 promoter region and that 15 (50.0%) of 30 breast tumors were hypermethylated in the LATS2 promoter region (Fig. 2). On the other hand, hypermethylation of LATS1 and LATS2 promoter regions was not observed in any of 6 adjacent normal breast tissues.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2 Representative results of methylation-specific PCR analysis of LATS1 (A) and LATS2 (B) in six breast tumors. M, methylated; U, unmethylated.

 
Relationship of Methylation Status of LATS1 and LATS2 with Their mRNA Levels. LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels were assayed by real-time PCR and compared between tumors with and without hypermethylation (Fig. 3). LATS1 mRNA levels in breast tumors with hypermethylation (2.15 ± 0.37, mean ± SE) were significantly (P < 0.01) lower than those without hypermethylation (6.09 ± 1.38), and LATS2 mRNA levels in breast tumors with hypermethylation (1.42 ± 0.66) were also significantly (P < 0.01) lower than those without hypermethylation (3.10 ± 1.00).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 3 Columns, mean value of LATS1 (A) and LATS2(B) mRNA levels between tumors with hypermethylation (M) and without hypermethylation (UM). Bars, SE.

 
Correlation of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA Levels with Various Clinicopathologic Parameters. LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels determined by a real-time PCR assay in 117 breast tumors are shown according to the various clinicopathologic parameters in Table 1. The decreased expression of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA was significantly associated with a large tumor size (P < 0.05 for LATS1 and P < 0.01 for LATS2). LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels were significantly (P < 0.05 for LATS1 and P < 0.01 for LATS2) lower in tumors with lymph node metastasis than in tumors without lymph node metastasis and were also significantly (P < 0.01) lower in estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor–negative tumors than estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor–positive tumors, respectively. Other parameters such as menopausal status and histologic grade did not show a significant correlation with the LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 Relationship between LATS1 or LATS2 mRNA expression levels and clinicopathologic parameters

 
Patients were dichotomized into high and low LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA level groups using a median value of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels, respectively, as a cutoff value. Patients with low LATS1 mRNA levels showed a significantly poorer relapse-free survival than those with high LATS1 mRNA levels (Fig. 4). Multivariate analysis has shown that the LATS1 mRNA levels are a significant (P < 0.05) prognostic factor, being independent of lymph node metastases (Table 2). On the other hand, relapse-free survival was not significantly different between patients with the high and low LATS2 mRNA levels (Fig. 4).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 4 Relapse-free survival of patients according to the expression levels of LATS1 mRNA (A) and LATS2 mRNA (B). One patient with noninvasive ductal cancer was omitted from this analysis.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of various prognostic factors

 

   DISCUSSION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Classic tumor suppressor genes are supposed to be inactivated by a combination of LOH of one allele and somatic mutation of the other allele. Although a relatively high frequency of LOH at the locus containing LATS1 or LATS2 has been reported in breast cancers (10, 15), somatic mutation of LATS1 has been shown to be not detected in breast cancers (19) and, in addition, we have found no somatic mutation of LATS2 in 20 breast cancers (data not shown). These results show that these two tumor suppressor genes are unlikely to be inactivated by such a classic manner as a combination of LOH and somatic mutation. Another possible mechanism of inactivation of a tumor suppressor gene is hypermethylation of the promoter region, as has already been shown in several other tumor suppressor genes (21–23). In breast cancers, aberrant methylation in p16 and BRCA1 genes have been shown to be possibly involved in the pathogenesis of tumor progression (28–31). Thus, we have studied the methylation status of promoter regions of both LATS1 and LATS2 in the present study and have found that the promoter regions of LATS1 and LATS2 were hypermethylated in as high as 56.7% and 50.0% of breast tumors, respectively. More importantly, tumors with hypermethylated LATS1 and LATS2 showed a significantly lower expression of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA, respectively, suggesting that hypermethylation of the promoter regions down-regulates the transcription of these genes. Our observation is consistent with the report on soft tissue sarcomas, which showed that hypermethylation of LATS1 was associated with a decreased expression of LATS1 mRNA (24). Taken together with the fact that hypermethylation of LATS1 and LATS2 was not seen in any of adjacent normal breast tissues, it is indicated that inactivation of LATS1 and LATS2 induced by hypermethylation may be involved in the pathogenesis of breast cancer.

Because LATS1 and LTAS2 play an important role in the regulation of cell cycle, tumors with a decreased expression of these genes are speculated to have a high proliferation rate and, thus, to show a biologically aggressive phenotype. In fact, we have found that a down-regulation of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels are associated with biologically aggressive phenotypes of breast tumors such as large tumor size, high frequency of lymph node metastases, and estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negativity. In addition, tumors with a decreased expression of LATS1 mRNA were significantly associated with a poor prognosis, and multivariate analysis has shown that a decreased LATS1 mRNA expression is a significant prognostic factor, being independent of the other classic prognostic factors such as lymph node status. These results suggest a possibility that LATS1 mRNA levels can be clinically useful for the prediction of patient prognosis.

The reason why LATS2 mRNA levels were not associated with patient prognosis, although they were significantly associated with biologically aggressive phenotypes of breast tumors, is unclear. Because most of the patients recruited in the present study were treated with adjuvant hormonal therapy and/or chemotherapy, it is possible that difference in sensitivity to the adjuvant therapy between tumors with the high and the low LATS2 mRNA levels might have masked the difference in prognosis. Ideally, the prognostic significance of LATS1 and LTAS2 mRNA levels needs to be tested in patients without adjuvant therapy. However, because most patients with breast cancer are recently treated with adjuvant therapy as the standard of care, it is practically almost infeasible to evaluate the real prognostic significance. Therefore, although we have shown a significant association of LATS1 mRNA levels and prognosis in the present study, it is hard to conclude that LAST1 mRNA levels can serve as a true prognostic factor. LATS1 mRNA might serve as a predictive factor of response to adjuvant therapy or as a both prognostic and predictive factor. It seems to be of interest to study the relationship of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels with sensitivity to various hormonal therapies and chemotherapies in future. Our present study is also vulnerable to the criticism that the LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels in tumors as well as the frequency of tumors with hypermethylation of LATS1 or LATS2 promoter region are affected by contamination with nontumor cells. The LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels in tumors might be overestimated and the frequency of tumors with hypermethylation of LATS1 or LATS2 promoter region might be underestimated by contamination with nontumor cells that express the LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels and lack the hypermethylation of LATS1 or LATS2 promoter region. To circumvent this contamination problem, we are planning to conduct a study wherein tumor cells are selectively collected using laser microdissection.

In conclusion, we have shown that hypermethylation of the promoter regions of LATS1 and LATS2 likely plays an important role in the down-regulation of their mRNA expression levels in breast cancers, and breast cancers with a decreased expression of LATS1 or LATS2 mRNA levels are significantly associated with a biologically aggressive phenotype. In addition, we have showed a possibility that a decreased LATS1 mRNA expression might serve as a significant prognostic factor being independent of the other classic prognostic factors. Because the follow-up period in the present study is relatively short, the prognostic significance of LATS1 and LATS2 mRNA levels needs to be further investigated by additional studies including a larger number of patients with a longer follow-up period.


   FOOTNOTES
 
Grant support: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Japan) grant-in-aid for Scientific Research Priority Area (C).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 8/31/04; revised 11/ 9/04; accepted 11/11/04.


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Justice RW, Zilian O, Woods DF, Noll M, Bryant PJ. The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene warts encodes a homolog of human myotonic dystrophy kinase and is required for the control of cell shape and proliferation. Genes Dev 1995;9:534–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Xu T, Wang W, Zhang S, Stewart RA, Yu W. Identifying tumor suppressors in genetic mosaics: the Drosophila lats gene encodes a putative protein kinase. Development 1995;121:1053–63.[Abstract]
  3. St. John MA, Tao W, Fei X, et al. Mice deficient of Lats1 develop soft-tissue sarcomas, ovarian tumors and pituitary dysfunction. Nat Genet 1999;21:182–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Nishiyama Y, Hirota T, Morisaki T, et al. A human homolog of Drosophila warts tumor suppressor, h-warts, localized to mitotic apparatus and specifically phosphorylated during mitosis. FEBS Lett 1999;459:159–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Cooke IE, Shelling AN, Le Meuth VG, Charnock ML, Ganesan TS. Allele loss on chromosome arm 6q and fine mapping of the region at 6q27 in epithelial ovarian cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1996;15:223–33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Lee JH, Kavanagh JJ, Wildrick DM, Wharton JT, Blick M. Frequent loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 6q, 11, and 17 in human ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res 1990;50:2724–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mazurenko N, Attaleb M, Gritsko T, et al. High resolution mapping of chromosome 6 deletions in cervical cancer. Oncol Rep 1999;6:859–63.[Medline]
  8. Fujii H, Zhou W, Gabrielson E. Detection of frequent allelic loss of 6q23-q25.2 in microdissected human breast cancer tissues. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1996;16:35–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Theile M, Seitz S, Arnold W, et al. A defined chromosome 6q fragment (at D6S3100) harbors a putative tumor suppressor gene for breast cancer. Oncogene 1996;13:677–85.[Medline]
  10. Noviello C, Courjal F, Theillet C. Loss of heterozygosity on the long arm of chromosome 6 in breast cancer: possibly four regions of deletion. Clin Cancer Res 1996;2:1601–6.[Abstract]
  11. Yang X, Li D, Chen W, Xu T. Human homologue of the Drosophila lats, LATS1, negatively regulate growth by inducing G2/M arrest or apoptosis. Oncogene 2001;20:6516–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Xia H, Qi H, Li Y, et al. LATS1 tumor suppressor regulates G2/M transition and apoptosis. Oncogene 2002;21:1233–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Yabuta N, Fujii T, Copeland NG, et al. Structure, expression, and chromosome mapping of LATS2, a mammalian homologue of the Drosophila tumor suppressor gene lats/warts. Genomics 2000;63:263–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Hori T, Takaori-Kondo A, Kamikubo Y, Uchiyama T. Molecular cloning of a novel human protein kinase, kpm, that is homologous to warts/lats, a Drosophila tumor suppressor. Oncogene 2000;19:3101–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Lee EY, To H, Shew JY, Bookstein R, Scully P, Lee WH. Inactivation of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene in human breast cancers. Science 1988;241:218–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sato T, Saito H, Morita R, Koi S, Lee JH, Nakamura Y. Allelotype of human ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 1991;51:5118–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wang H, Roger C. Deletions in human chromosome arms 11p and 13 q in primary hepatocellular carcinomas. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1988;48:72–8.[Medline]
  18. Li Y, Pei J, Xia H, Ke H, Wang H, Tao W. Lats2, a putative tumor suppressor, inhibits G1/S transition. Onocogene 2003;22:4398–405.
  19. Morinaga N, Shitara Y, Yanagita Y, et al. Molecular analysis of the h-warts/LATS1 gene in human breast cancer. Int J Oncol 2000;17:1125–9.[Medline]
  20. Ishizaki K, Fujimoto J, Kumimoto H, et al. Frequent polymorphic changes but rare tumor specific mutations of the LATS2 gene on 13q11-12 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol 2002;21:1053–7.[Medline]
  21. Esteller M, Corn PG, Baylin SB, Herman JG. A gene hypermethylation profile of human cancer. Cancer Res 2001;61:3225–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Clark SJ, Melki J. DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer: which is the guilty party? Oncogene 2002;21:5380–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Jones PA, Baylin SB. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 2002;3:415–28.[Medline]
  24. Hisaoka M, Tanaka A, Hashimoto H. Molecular alterations of h-warts/LATS1 tumor suppressor in human soft tissue sarcoma. Lab Invest 2002;82:1427–35.[Medline]
  25. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Senn HJ, Glick JH, Gelber RD. Fifth International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer, St Gallen, Mar 1995. International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Eur J Cancer 1995;31A:1754–9.
  26. Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer, 6th International Conference, Olma Messen St Gallen, Feb 25-28, 1998. Eur J Cancer 1998;34 Suppl 1:S3–45.
  27. Herman JG, Graff JR, Myohanen S, Nelkin BD, Baylin SB. Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:9821–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Herman JG, Merlo A, Mao L, et al. Inactivation of the CDKN2/p16/MTS1 gene is frequently associated with aberrant DNA methylation in all common human cancers. Cancer Res 1995;55:4525–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Silva J, Silva JM, Dominguez G, et al. Concomitant expression of p16INK4a and p14ARF in primary breast cancer and analysis of inactivation mechanisms. J Pathol 2003;199:289–97.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Niwa Y, Oyama T, Nakajima T. BRCA1 expression status in relation to DNA methylation of the BRCA1 promoter region in sporadic breast cancers. Jpn J Cancer Res 2000;91:519–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Rice JC, Ozcelik H, Maxeiner P, Andrulis I, Futscher BW. Methylation of the BRCA1 promoter is associated with decreased BRCA1 mRNA levels in clinical breast cancer specimens. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:1761–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
A. R. Sepulveda, D. Jones, S. Ogino, W. Samowitz, M. L. Gulley, R. Edwards, V. Levenson, V. M. Pratt, B. Yang, K. Nafa, et al.
CpG Methylation Analysis--Current Status of Clinical Assays and Potential Applications in Molecular Diagnostics: A Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology
J. Mol. Diagn., July 1, 2009; 11(4): 266 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Circ. Res.Home page
Y. Matsui, N. Nakano, D. Shao, S. Gao, W. Luo, C. Hong, P. Zhai, E. Holle, X. Yu, N. Yabuta, et al.
Lats2 Is a Negative Regulator of Myocyte Size in the Heart
Circ. Res., November 21, 2008; 103(11): 1309 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
M. Kawahara, T. Hori, K. Chonabayashi, T. Oka, M. Sudol, and T. Uchiyama
Kpm/Lats2 is linked to chemosensitivity of leukemic cells through the stabilization of p73
Blood, November 1, 2008; 112(9): 3856 - 3866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Oka, V. Mazack, and M. Sudol
Mst2 and Lats Kinases Regulate Apoptotic Function of Yes Kinase-associated Protein (YAP)
J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2008; 283(41): 27534 - 27546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
B. V. V. G. Reddy and K. D. Irvine
The Fat and Warts signaling pathways: new insights into their regulation, mechanism and conservation
Development, September 1, 2008; 135(17): 2827 - 2838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
Y.-K. I. Lau, L. B. Murray, S. S. Houshmandi, Y. Xu, D. H. Gutmann, and Q. Yu
Merlin Is a Potent Inhibitor of Glioma Growth
Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5733 - 5742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
J. Zhang, G. A. Smolen, and D. A. Haber
Negative Regulation of YAP by LATS1 Underscores Evolutionary Conservation of the Drosophila Hippo Pathway
Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 68(8): 2789 - 2794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
M. Zhao, P. Szafranski, C. A. Hall, and S. Goode
Basolateral Junctions Utilize Warts Signaling to Control Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Proliferation Crucial For Migration and Invasion of Drosophila Ovarian Epithelial Cells
Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 1947 - 1971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
P. Ouillette, H. Erba, L. Kujawski, M. Kaminski, K. Shedden, and S. N. Malek
Integrated Genomic Profiling of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Identifies Subtypes of Deletion 13q14
Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 68(4): 1012 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
A. M. Eiring, P. Neviani, R. Santhanam, J. J. Oaks, J. S. Chang, M. Notari, W. Willis, C. Gambacorti-Passerini, S. Volinia, G. Marcucci, et al.
Identification of novel posttranscriptional targets of the BCR/ABL oncoprotein by ribonomics: requirement of E2F3 for BCR/ABL leukemogenesis
Blood, January 15, 2008; 111(2): 816 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genes Dev.Home page
B. Zhao, X. Wei, W. Li, R. S. Udan, Q. Yang, J. Kim, J. Xie, T. Ikenoue, J. Yu, L. Li, et al.
Inactivation of YAP oncoprotein by the Hippo pathway is involved in cell contact inhibition and tissue growth control
Genes & Dev., November 1, 2007; 21(21): 2747 - 2761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
I. Perez de Castro, G. de Carcer, and M. Malumbres
A census of mitotic cancer genes: new insights into tumor cell biology and cancer therapy
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2007; 28(5): 899 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
D. M. Tyler, W. Li, N. Zhuo, B. Pellock, and N. E. Baker
Genes Affecting Cell Competition in Drosophila
Genetics, February 1, 2007; 175(2): 643 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genes Dev.Home page
Y. Aylon, D. Michael, A. Shmueli, N. Yabuta, H. Nojima, and M. Oren
A positive feedback loop between the p53 and Lats2 tumor suppressors prevents tetraploidization
Genes & Dev., October 1, 2006; 20(19): 2687 - 2700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Noguchi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Noguchi, S.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online