
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis |
1 Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado and 2 diaDexus, Inc., South San Francisco, California
Requests for reprints: Kenneth R. Shroyer, Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East Ninth Avenue Denver, CO 80262. Phone: 303-724-3060; Fax: 303-724-3712; E-mail: Ken.Shroyer{at}UCHSC.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design: Archival formalin-fixed tissue blocks from breast cancers and normal somatic tissues were evaluated for B7-H4 expression by immunohistochemistry with manual and automated image analysis. The proportion of B7-H4-positive cells and the intensity of B7-H4 staining were compared with histologic type, grade, stage, hormone receptor status, and HER-2/neu status.
Results: B7-H4 was detected in 165 of 173 (95.4%) primary breast cancers and in 240 of 246 (97.6%) metastatic breast cancers. B7-H4 staining intensity was greater in invasive ductal carcinomas [24.61 relative units (RU)] and in invasive lobular carcinomas (15.23 RU) than in normal breast epithelium (4.30 RU, P = 0.0003). Increased staining intensity was associated with negative progesterone receptor status (P = 0.014) and history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.004), and the proportion of B7-H4-positive cells was associated with negative progesterone receptor (P = 0.001) and negative HER-2/neu (P = 0.024) status. However, there was no statistically significant relationship between the proportion of B7-H4-positive cells or staining intensity and grade, stage, or other clinicopathologic variables. Low levels of B7-H4 expression were also detected in epithelial cells of the female genital tract, lung, pancreas, and kidney, but B7-H4 was generally absent in most other normal somatic tissues.
Conclusions: The nearly ubiquitous expression of B7-H4 in breast cancer, independent of tumor grade or stage, suggests a critical role for this protein in breast cancer biology.
Key Words: B7-H4 breast cancer immunohistochemistry molecular marker therapeutic target
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We initially identified and characterized DD-O110 as a novel gene encoding a predicted membrane glycoprotein that is overexpressed in breast and ovarian cancer with relatively little expression in normal somatic tissues, by quantitative PCR analysis of over 200 human tissue samples.3 Based on the predicted amino acid sequence, we subsequently determined that DD-O110 is homologous to B7-H4 (also known as B7x or B7S1), a recently discovered B7 family member. B7 family members and their receptors play critical roles in the regulation of antigen-specific immune responses (2). B7-H4 ligation to its receptor BTLA on T lymphocytes results in inhibition of T-cell activation, cytokine secretion, and the development of cytotoxicity (36). B7-H4 mRNA but not protein expression has been detected in a wide range of normal somatic tissues, including liver, skeletal muscle, kidney, pancreas, and small bowel (3, 5). However, cell surface expression of B7-H4 protein was induced upon stimulation of T cells, B cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells in addition to a constitutive B7-H4 protein expression in lung and ovarian cancer (5). The significance of B7-H4 expression in normal or malignant nonhematopoietic cell populations has not been determined.
The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that B7-H4 protein is consistently overexpressed in primary and metastatic breast cancer and to determine if B7-H4 expression is dependent on histologic type, grade, stage, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) or HER-2/neu status, or with other clinical variables.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Development and Characterization of the A57.1 Antibody Directed Against B7-H4. Monoclonal antibody production and characterization was done at diaDexus (South San Francisco, CA). Seven to 8-week-old BALB/c mice were immunized twice weekly over a 5- to 6-week period with 10 µg of the recombinant B7-H4 protein, corresponding to the complete extracellular domain of the native protein. Lymphocytes were subsequently isolated and fused with P3x63Ag8.653 cells (7) to form a hybridoma using standard techniques. Hybridoma supernatants were screened by ELISA for reactivity against B7-H4 and for the absence of cross-reactivity with an unrelated recombinant protein. B7-H4-positive hybridomas were cloned by single-cell sorting using a Coulter EPICS Elite-ESP Flow Cytometer (Beckman-Coulter, Miami, FL). The A57.1 monoclonal antibody was selected for use in subsequent studies.
Western Blot Analysis. SKBR3, MCF-7, and RK3E cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Mannasas, VA). RK3E cells were infected with a recombinant retrovirus expressing either B7-H4 or alkaline phosphatase used as a control. Twenty-five micrograms of protein extracts were separated on a precast 4% to 12% SDS polyacrylamide minigel (Nupage; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and transferred to an Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Invitrogen). The membrane was blocked for 1 hour at room temperature using 5% nonfat dry milk and incubated overnight with the A57.1 antibody (1 µg/mL). The blot was developed using a horseradish peroxidase linked goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA; 1:10,000) for 1 hour at room temperature and subsequently visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent per manufacturer's directions (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NY).
Immunohistochemical Staining. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were sectioned to 5 µm and mounted on charged glass slides (Superfrost Plus, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3.0% hydrogen peroxide for 15 minutes. Antigen retrieval was done in a citrate buffer [20 mmol/L (pH 6.0)] at 120°C for 10 minutes. Staining was conducted on a DAKO autostainer (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA) using an indirect avidin-biotin immunoperoxidase method (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Sections were incubated at 25°C for 60 minutes with the A57.1 antibody (0.8 µg/mL). Negative controls were run on all sections at 0.8 µg/mL of a subclass-matched IgG1
(BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA), generated against unrelated antigens. B7-H4 staining was visualized using 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DakoCytomation). Specificity of B7-H4 staining was confirmed by a blocking experiment with preincubation of the A57.1 antibody with the full-length B7-H4 protein (7.80 ng/mL) at 25°C for 60 minutes, before immunohistochemical processing.
Evaluation of B7-H4 Staining. The proportion of B7-H4-positive cells for each case was scored on a scale from 0% to 100%. Results represent the average proportion of B7-H4-positive cells within the entire tumor area of a single representative tissue block (0-10% positive cells, >10-50% positive cells, >50-80% positive cells, and >80-100% positive cells). The B7-H4 stained slides were digitally scanned using a Zeiss Axioskop 50 microscope fitted to a Syncroscan imaging system (Syncroscopy, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Image manipulation and preparation was done using Adobe Photoshop 6.0 and image analysis of tumor and normal breast epithelium was done using Media Cybernetics Optimas 6.5 (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MA). Median delta base 10 intensity values (derived from 256 Grayscale median pixel Luminosity) were corrected by subtraction of hematoxylin-based background staining and recorded as relative units (RU).
Statistical Analysis. The association of proportion of B7-H4-positive cases and proportion of B7-H4-positive cells with categorical clinicopathologic characteristics was assessed by the Fisher's Exact test or the
2 test where appropriate. The differences between median staining intensity and clinicopathologic variables were evaluated by the Wilcoxon rank sum test or the Kruskal-Wallis test where appropriate. Statistically significant univariate relationships were further evaluated by multivariate analysis. A log-rank test was used to test for differences in overall patient survival. Ps
0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were done using SAS v8.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
60 to 80 kDa as well as several minor species of lower molecular weight in RK3E B7-H4 cells overexpressing human B7-H4 protein, but did not detect B7-H4 protein in negative control RK3E alkaline phosphatase cells expressing alkaline phosphatase. Similar protein bands were noted in extracts of both MCF-7 (low-level B7-H4 mRNA expression) and SKBR3 (high-level B7-H4 mRNA expression) breast cancer cells. In other experiments, we have shown that the size heterogeneity observed for B7-H4 proteins in tumor tissues and cell lines is due to variable N-linked glycosylation.4 Preincubation of the B7-H4.A57.1 antibody with the full-length recombinant B7-H4 protein completely blocked the staining in histologic sections.
|
|
|
|
|
Normal Somatic Tissue. Predominantly apical, luminal membranous B7-H4 expression was observed in ductal and lobular epithelial cells in 15 of 15 (100%) cases of normal breast tissue (Table 1; Fig. 2D). In one case, however, there was circumferential membranous B7-H4 expression, equivalent to that seen in breast carcinomas. B7-H4 expression was never identified in myoepithelial cells or in other cellular components of normal breast tissue.
A broad spectrum of normal adult and fetal somatic tissues was evaluated to test for the expression of B7-H4 in other cell types (Table 3). The confluent circumferential membranous pattern of expression, as seen in breast cancer cases, was never observed in normal adult somatic tissues of any anatomic site. However, apical membranous expression was noted in fallopian tubal epithelium (17 of 17), endometrial glandular epithelium (19 of 25), and occasionally in endometrial luminal surface epithelium. In addition, uniform cytoplasmic expression without a membranous component was observed in endocervical glands (10 of 10). Focal membranous expression was detected in the bronchial epithelium of the lung (4 of 4), the columnar epithelium of the gallbladder (1 of 5), the ductal and occasionally acinar epithelium of the pancreas (10 of 10), the distal convoluted tubules of the kidney (5 of 11), and the transitional epithelium of the ureter (2 of 3) and the urinary bladder (4 of 4). Focal cytoplasmic B7-H4 expression was also noted in the pars intermedia of 1/4 sections of normal pituitary. B7-H4 cytoplasmic expression was further detected in the squamous epithelium of the larynx (2 of 3), as well as the cortex and cuticle of hair shafts and in the inner zone of the outer root sheath of hair follicles (7 of 7). All other normal somatic tissues were consistently negative for B7-H4 expression.
Within fetal tissue, B7-H4 expression was noted in the bronchial epithelium of the lung, the distal convoluted tubules and collecting ducts of the kidney, the hair follicles, the amniotic epithelium, and in cytotrophoblast cells of chorionic villi of first trimester placentas. By contrast, chorionic villi from term placentas were always negative for B7-H4 expression (Table 3).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The current study is the first to examine the expression of B7-H4 protein in primary and metastatic breast cancer. In addition, we evaluated B7-H4 protein expression in normal breast tissue and in a wide range of normal adult and fetal somatic tissues. B7-H4 circumferential membranous and cytoplasmic expression was observed in >95% of invasive breast cancer cases and was also detected in most nodal metastases. Univariate analysis showed a significant correlation between the proportion of B7-H4-positive cells and a negative status of PR and HER-2/neu. A significant association was also observed between B7-H4 staining intensity and negative PR status, and a history of treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy but not with other clinicopathologic variables or overall patient survival. The observed relationship between B7-H4 staining intensity level and negative PR status in primary breast cancer was not anticipated and could not be attributed to an indirect relationship with tumor grade. Thus, further studies are warranted to determine if this inverse association is due to other confounding clinicopathologic variables or could reflect a mechanistic link between B7-H4 expression and PR status.
This study provided pivotal data but not definitive evidence to support the concept that B7-H4 could be a diagnostic marker or therapeutic target for breast cancer. Both HER-2/neu and B7-H4 are associated with the cell surface, an important consideration for potential antibody therapeutic targets (9, 10). B7-H4 overexpression was detected in most breast carcinomas, including cases that were not candidates for hormonal or trastuzumab (Herceptin) therapy due to negative ER/PR and HER-2/neu status. By contrast, only weak apical cell surface expression of B7-H4 was seen in normal ductal and lobular breast epithelial cells. Focal apical membranous B7-H4 expression was also observed in the distal convoluted tubules of the kidney, ductal cells, and rare acinar cells of the pancreas, endometrial glands, and in few other normal somatic tissues. Previous studies have indicated that HER-2/neu is also expressed in some normal somatic tissues, including renal tubular epithelium, pancreatic acinar cells, and endometrial glands (1114). Thus, the limited expression of B7-H4 in a subset of normal tissues does not necessarily rule out a potential role for this protein as a therapeutic target for patients with breast cancer.
Our findings that B7-H4 is not expressed in liver, small bowel, colon, and skeletal muscle are consistent with previous observations by Sica et al. (3) and Choi et al. (5). In contrast with our current study, however, Choi et al. reported that B7-H4 is not expressed in the lung, gallbladder, pancreas, kidney, ureter, urinary bladder, pituitary, or breast. The antibody used by Choi et al. was used at a dilution of 1:100 (final concentration not specified) and was noted to be reactive only with tissue frozen sections (5). By contrast, the A57.1 monoclonal antibody in our study was used at a dilution of 1:2,000 (final concentration, 0.8 µg/mL) and was reactive with both frozen sections and sections from archival formalin-fixed tissue blocks. Thus, the basis for the discrepancy in the detection of B7-H4 in some normal tissues from our study compared with previous observations by Choi et al. could be due to differences in the sensitivity of the immunohistochemical staining protocols or to differences in the B7-H4 antibodies that were used.
Although the role of B7-H4 expression in malignant transformation or tumor progression has not been determined, B7 family members and their receptors are known to regulate antigen-specific immune response through inhibition of T-cell activation, cytokine secretion, and the development of cytotoxicity (26). Extensive laboratory and histopathologic data indicate that T-cell immune reactivity is a favorable prognostic indicator in nonmetastatic breast cancer but that the suppression of cell-mediated immunity could be critically involved in breast cancer progression (1517). Thus, it is reasonable to hypothesize that B7-H4 overexpression could provide a mechanism for tumors to avoid detection by immune surveillance. In this light, we are currently focusing on experiments to determine if an antibody approach could inhibit tumor cell growth and/or reverse the postulated antitumor effects of B7-H4 on the immune system.
In conclusion, this study showed that B7-H4 is consistently expressed in most primary and metastatic breast carcinomas. Although B7-H4 detection was associated with negative progesterone receptor status, negative HER-2/neu status, and history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, B7-H4 expression was independent of tumor grade, stage, or other clinicopathologic variables. The nearly ubiquitous expression of B7-H4 in breast carcinomas suggests that B7-H4 could be involved in breast cancer pathogenesis or tumor progression. Further studies, however, are indicated to evaluate the potential role of B7-H4 as a diagnostic marker or therapeutic target.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
3 Papkoff et al., submitted for publication. ![]()
4 Papkoff et al., submitted for publication. ![]()
Received 8/17/04; revised 11/11/04; accepted 12/13/04.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. H. Thompson, X. Zang, C. M. Lohse, B. C. Leibovich, S. F. Slovin, V. E. Reuter, J. C. Cheville, M. L. Blute, P. Russo, E. D. Kwon, et al. Serum-Soluble B7x Is Elevated in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients and Is Associated with Advanced Stage Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 68(15): 6054 - 6058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zang, R. H. Thompson, H. A. Al-Ahmadie, A. M. Serio, V. E. Reuter, J. A. Eastham, P. T. Scardino, P. Sharma, and J. P. Allison B7-H3 and B7x are highly expressed in human prostate cancer and associated with disease spread and poor outcome PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19458 - 19463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kryczek, S. Wei, G. Zhu, L. Myers, P. Mottram, P. Cheng, L. Chen, G. Coukos, and W. Zou Relationship between B7-H4, Regulatory T Cells, and Patient Outcome in Human Ovarian Carcinoma Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8900 - 8905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zang and J. P. Allison The B7 Family and Cancer Therapy: Costimulation and Coinhibition Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5271 - 5279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Roth, Y. Sheinin, C. M. Lohse, S. M. Kuntz, X. Frigola, B. A. Inman, A. E. Krambeck, M. E. Mckenney, R. J. Karnes, M. L. Blute, et al. B7-H3 Ligand Expression by Prostate Cancer: A Novel Marker of Prognosis and Potential Target for Therapy Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 67(16): 7893 - 7900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Sadun, S. M. Sachsman, X. Chen, K. W. Christenson, W. Z. Morris, P. Hu, and A. L. Epstein Immune Signatures of Murine and Human Cancers Reveal Unique Mechanisms of Tumor Escape and New Targets for Cancer Immunotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 13(13): 4016 - 4025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Beier, T. Kallinich, and E. Hamelmann Master switches of T-cell activation and differentiation Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2007; 29(4): 804 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-K. Suh, S. Wang, G. S. Duncan, Y. Miyazaki, E. Cates, T. Walker, B. U. Gajewska, E. Deenick, W. Dawicki, H. Okada, et al. Generation and Characterization of B7-H4/B7S1/B7x-Deficient Mice. Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(17): 6403 - 6411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Krambeck, R. H. Thompson, H. Dong, C. M. Lohse, E. S. Park, S. M. Kuntz, B. C. Leibovich, M. L. Blute, J. C. Cheville, and E. D. Kwon B7-H4 expression in renal cell carcinoma and tumor vasculature: Associations with cancer progression and survival PNAS, July 5, 2006; 103(27): 10391 - 10396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Martin-Orozco and C. Dong New battlefields for costimulation J. Exp. Med., April 17, 2006; 203(4): 817 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Simon, S. Zhuo, L. Corral, E. P. Diamandis, M. J. Sarno, R. L. Wolfert, and N. W. Kim B7-H4 Is a Novel Membrane-Bound Protein and a Candidate Serum and Tissue Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 66(3): 1570 - 1575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |