Clinical Cancer Research Research Funding Stand Up to Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sacchi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Corti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sacchi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Corti, A.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 12, 175-182, January 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Synergistic Antitumor Activity of Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, and Gemcitabine with Tumor Vasculature-Targeted Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}

Angelina Sacchi1, Anna Gasparri1, Corrado Gallo-Stampino2, Salvatore Toma2, Flavio Curnis1 and Angelo Corti1

Authors' Affiliations: 1 DIBIT-Department of Oncology, Cancer Immunotherapy and Gene Therapy Program, San Raffaele H. Scientific Institute; 2 Molmed S.p.A., Milan, Italy

Requests for reprints: Angelo Corti, DIBIT-Department of Oncology, San Raffaele H. Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy. Phone: 39-2-26434802; Fax: 39-2-2643786; E-mail: corti.angelo{at}hsr.it.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: Subnanogram doses of NGR-tumor necrosis factor (TNF), a TNF-{alpha} derivative able to target tumor neovessels, can enhance the antitumor activity of doxorubicin and melphalan in murine models. We have examined the antitumor activity of NGR-TNF in combination with various chemotherapeutic drugs acting via different mechanisms, including, besides doxorubicin and melphalan, cisplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine.

Experimental Design: Chemotherapeutic drugs were tested alone and in combination with NGR-TNF (0.1 ng) in murine lymphoma, fibrosarcoma, and mammary adenocarcinoma models. Different administration schedules have been tested and the effects on tumor growth, animal weight, tumor perfusion, and cell cytotoxicity have been investigated.

Results: Pretreatment with NGR-TNF enhanced the response to all these drugs although to a different extent. The increased efficacy was not accompanied by increased toxicity at least as judged from the loss of animal weight. The synergistic effect was transient, maximal synergism being observed with a 2-hour delay between NGR-TNF and drug administrations in all models and with all drugs tested. NGR-TNF did not increase the in vitro cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs against tumor cells, suggesting that the in vivo synergism depends on NGR-TNF effects on host cells rather than on tumor cells.

Conclusions: Targeted delivery of low doses of NGR-TNF to the tumor vasculature can increase the efficacy of various drugs acting via different mechanisms. Optimal administration schedule requires 2 hours of pretreatment with NGR-TNF independently from the mechanism of drug cytotoxicity. This work could provide important information for designing clinical studies with NGR-TNF in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs.

Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF) is currently used in combination with melphalan or, less frequently, with doxorubicin in isolated limb or hepatic perfusion of patients with tumors confined to the extremities or to the liver (1–5). Unfortunately, the clinical use of TNF as an anticancer drug is limited to locoregional treatments because of systemic toxicity (6, 7). We have shown previously that systemic administration of picogram doses of NGR-TNF, a TNF derivative able to target the tumor vasculature (8), can enhance the antitumor activity of melphalan and doxorubicin in mouse models, with no evidence of increased toxicity (9). NGR-TNF was prepared by coupling TNF with the tumor-homing peptide Cys-Asn-Gly-Arg-Cys (CNGRC), a ligand of a CD13 (aminopeptidase N) isoform expressed by endothelial cells in tumor vessels (8, 10, 11). Studies on the mechanism of action showed that targeted delivery of very low doses of NGR-TNF to the tumor vasculature is a valuable strategy for overcoming major TNF counterregulatory mechanisms and for increasing the penetration of doxorubicin in murine B16 melanomas and RMA lymphomas (9).

In view of the potential clinical application of NGR-TNF in combination with different chemotherapeutic drugs, this work was undertaken to examine the antitumor activity of NGR-TNF in combination with various chemotherapeutic drugs acting via different mechanisms, including, besides doxorubicin and melphalan, cisplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine. Different administration schedules have been tested in RMA lymphoma-bearing mice, the effect of NGR-TNF on tumor vessel and microenvironment being characterized previously in this model (8, 9, 12) as well as in other murine fibrosarcoma and mammary adenocarcinoma models.

We show that NGR-TNF can exert synergistic effects not only with melphalan and doxorubicin but also with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel, provided that the timing of administration is carefully scheduled. Moreover, we provide data to suggest that the response strongly depends on the in vivo tumor sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic drug and much less to the in vitro sensitivity, pointing to a role of tumor microenvironment elements and tumor-host interactions in the overall response.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor cell lines, drugs, and reagents. Mouse RMA and RMA-T lymphoma, TS/A mammary adenocarcinoma, and WEHI-164 fibrosarcoma cells were cultured as described previously (8, 13, 14). Melphalan (Alkeran) was obtained from Glaxo-Wellcome (London, United Kingdom); doxorubicin (Adriblastina) was purchased from Pharmacia-Upjohn (Milan, Italy); cisplatin (Cisplatino Teva) was from Teva Pharma Italia S.r.l. (Milan, Italy); paclitaxel (Taxol) was from Bristol-Myers Squibb S.r.l. (Sermoneta, Italy); and gemcitabine (Gemzar) was from Ely Lilly Italia S.p.A. (Sesto Fiorentino, Italy). Human and murine TNF and NGR-TNF (consisting of TNF fused with the COOH terminus of CNGRCG) were prepared by recombinant DNA technology and purified from Escherichia coli cell extracts as described (8). Murine NGR-TNF was used in in vivo and in vitro studies involving murine models. Human NGR-TNF was used in in vitro cytotoxicity studies with human umbilical vein endothelial cells.

In vitro cytotoxicity assays. RMA cells were plated in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (6 x 104, 100 µL) and incubated overnight at 37°C, 5% CO2. NGR-TNF (1 ng/mL in complete RPMI 1640) was added to each well (50 µL) followed 2 hours later by chemotherapeutic drugs solutions at various concentrations (50 µL) and incubated for 48 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide solution (10 µL, 5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to each well and left to incubate for 3 hours. Then, the cells were treated with 10% (w/v) SDS, 50% (v/v) N,N-dimethylformamide, 0.025 mol/L HCl, and 0.35 mol/L acetic acid solution (100 µL/well, 24 hours at 37°C). The absorbance of each well at 570 and 650 nm (reference) was then measured using a microplate reader.

The same procedure was applied for cytotoxicity assays involving TS/A, WEHI-164, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells.

In vivo studies. Studies on animal models were approved by the Ethical Committee of the San Raffaele H. Scientific Institute and done according to the prescribed guidelines. C57BL/6/N female, 8 weeks old, were from Charles River Laboratories Italia S.p.A. (Calco, Italy). BALB/c female, 8 weeks old, were from Harlan Italy (San Pietro al Natisone, Italy).

Mice were challenged with s.c. injection in the left flank of 7 x 104 RMA cells (C57BL/6), 105 TS/A cells (BALB/c), or 106 WEHI-164 cells (BALB/c); 9 to 10 days later, mice were treated with NGR-TNF solutions (100 µL) in 0.9% NaCl containing 100 µg/mL endotoxin-free human serum albumin (Farma-Biagini, Lucca, Italy) followed by administration of chemotherapeutic drug solution (100 µL) diluted with 0.9% NaCl. All drugs were given i.p. Tumor growth was monitored daily by measuring tumor volumes with calipers as described previously (15). Animals were sacrificed before the tumors reached 1.0 to 1.5 cm in diameter. Tumor sizes are shown as mean ± SE (five animals per group). Statistical analysis was done by two-tailed t test. Differences between groups were considered significant when P < 0.05.

The lack of palpable tumors after therapy was considered complete tumor rejection.

Tumor perfusion with patent blue. C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice bearing RMA or WEHI-164 tumors (diameter, 1.0-1.4 cm) were treated with or without murine NGR-TNF (0.1 ng i.p.) followed 2 or 5 hours later by patent blue VF (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 12.5 mg/mL, 0.1 mL i.v.). After 5 minutes, the animals were sacrificed and the tumors were excised. Each tumor was weighed, homogenized, resuspended in cold PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 (1 mL/g tumor), and incubated for 1 hour on ice. The suspension was then centrifuged (14,000 x g, 4°C, 15 minutes) and the supernatant was mixed with trichloroacetic acid [10% (v/v), final concentration]. The product was centrifuged again (14,000 x g, 4°C, 15 minutes) and the absorbance at 405 nm of the supernatant was measured using a spectrophotometer.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Antitumor activity of NGR-TNF in combination with cisplatin in the RMA and RMA-T lymphoma models. In previous work, we showed that 0.1 ng NGR-TNF given to RMA tumor-bearing mice, although poorly active alone, is sufficient to increase the antitumor activity of melphalan and doxorubicin, whereas 104 to 105 greater doses of TNF are necessary to achieve comparable results (9). The same dose of NGR-TNF (0.1 ng) was therefore used to investigate the effect of this cytokine in combination with cisplatin on RMA tumors. In this model, 30 µg cisplatin induced little or no effects when used alone. However, a significant antitumor response was observed when NGR-TNF was given 2 hours before cisplatin, whereas the response was lower at 1- or 3-hour intervals (Fig. 1A).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Effect of NGR-TNF in combination with cisplatin on RMA lymphoma growth in vivo. Animals bearing RMA tumors (five mice per group) were treated i.p. with NGR-TNF in combination with cisplatin at day 10 after tumor implantation. Tumor volumes after treatment are shown for three separate experiments (A-C). The schedule of treatments (timing and doses) is indicated. NGR-TNF was given 1, 2, or 3 hours before cisplatin (arrows). A, right, {blacksquare} versus {square} at day 18 (P < 0.01). B, {blacklozenge} versus {lozenge} at day 14 (P < 0.01); {blacktriangleup} versus {triangleup} at day 14 (P < 0.0001). C, numbers, tumor-free mice at day 30.

 
In another experiment, we compared the effect of 20 and 60 µg cisplatin in animals bearing RMA tumors pretreated, 2 hours before, with or without NGR-TNF. Again, we observed stronger responses in animals pretreated with NGR-TNF (Fig. 1B). Noteworthy, the effect of NGR-TNF plus 20 µg cisplatin was stronger than that of 60 µg cisplatin alone. Remarkably, the increased antitumor effect observed with each drug combination was not associated with a greater body weight loss compared with cisplatin alone (data not shown).

No complete tumor rejection was observed with cisplatin alone, even when a higher dose (80 µg) was used in the RMA-T model, a more immunogenic tumor, whereas three of five mice showed complete tumor rejection in this model by the combination treatment (Fig. 1C).

These results suggest that NGR-TNF can exert synergistic effects with cisplatin, provided that this chemotherapeutic drug is given 2 hours after the cytokine.

Antitumor activity of NGR-TNF in combination with paclitaxel or gemcitabine in the RMA lymphoma model. To assess whether the same phenomenon could occur also with other chemotherapeutic drugs, we tested the effect of NGR-TNF in combination with paclitaxel or gemcitabine, with various administration schedules. Also in this case, we observed significantly higher antitumor effects, compared with each drug alone, when NGR-TNF was given 2 hours before gemcitabine (1.8 mg) and less, or not at all, with 0-, 1-, or 3-hour intervals (Fig. 2).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Effect of different administration schedules of NGR-TNF in combination with gemcitabine on RMA tumors. Tumor-bearing mice (five mice per group) were treated with NGR-TNF in combination with gemcitabine at day 10 after tumor implantation. NGR-TNF and gemcitabine were given with 0, 1, 2, or 3 hours intervals at the indicated doses. {blacksquare} versus {square}. *, P < 0.05.

 
Similar results were obtained also with paclitaxel (60 and 80 µg; Fig. 3A and B). These results suggest that the timing of administration is very critical for the antitumor activity of all combination tested. The increase of the antitumor activity of gemcitabine and paclitaxel by NGR-TNF was apparently modest in this model compared with cisplatin. However, when the dose of gemcitabine was increased to 5.4 mg alone, we obtained only a modest increase of activity (Fig. 2, right). Moreover, the increase of the dose of paclitaxel from 60 to 180 µg was associated with higher loss of body weight (data not shown) and a lower response (Fig. 2A). These results suggest that RMA tumors do not respond to gemcitabine or paclitaxel in a linear manner. Nevertheless, despite the lower response rates with these drugs compared with cisplatin, it is remarkable that NGR-TNF combined with 1.8 mg gemcitabine produced stronger effects than 5.4 mg gemcitabine alone and that NGR-TNF combined with 60 µg paclitaxel produced stronger effects than 180 µg paclitaxel alone without causing loss of body weight.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Effect of different administration schedules of NGR-TNF in combination with paclitaxel on RMA tumor growth. Tumor-bearing mice (five mice per group) were treated with NGR-TNF in combination with paclitaxel at day 10 after tumor implantation. The schedules of treatment (timing and doses) are indicated in each panel for two independent experiments (A and B). {blacksquare} versus {square}. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

 
Antitumor activity of NGR-TNF in combination with melphalan in the RMA lymphoma model. The NGR-TNF (0.1 ng)/melphalan (90 µg) combination has been tested previously in the B16 and RMA-T models, showing good synergism (9). To provide comparable data with cisplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine, we have tested this combination in RMA tumor-bearing mice. When mice were treated with 50 or 150 µg melphalan alone, we observed a dose-dependent response (Fig. 4). Preadministration (2 hours) of NGR-TNF markedly increased the effect of 50 µg melphalan, apparently much more than observed with gemcitabine, paclitaxel, or cisplatin. However, it is noteworthy that the effect of NGR-TNF/melphalan (50 µg) was similar to that of 150 µg melphalan alone in terms of both tumor mass reduction and survival increase. We estimate, therefore, that also in this case a >3-fold potentiation activity occurred as observed with cisplatin and the other drugs. These results suggest that the apparent potentiation of drug efficacy by NGR-TNF is strongly dependent on the in vivo assay sensitivity, which is likely drug and model dependent.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Effect of NGR-TNF in combination with melphalan on RMA tumors. Mice bearing RMA tumors (five mice per group) were treated i.p. with NGR-TNF in combination with melphalan at day 10 after tumor implantation. NGR-TNF was given 2 hours before melphalan at the indicated doses. Top, tumor volume; bottom, animal survival. Mice that rejected the tumor rejected also a second challenge at day 80 (2nd ch.) with fresh tumor cells. Top, {bullet} versus {circ} at day 20 (P < 0.001); {blacksquare} versus {square} at day 20 (P < 0.05).

 
Antitumor activity of NGR-TNF in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs in WEHI-164 fibrosarcoma and TS/A adenocarcinoma models. We then addressed whether the optimal administration schedule was drug and model dependent. To this aim, we tested the effect of NGR-TNF/doxorubicin in the TS/A adenocarcinoma and NGR-TNF/melphalan in the WEHI-164 model with 1-, 2-, and 3-hour delay between drug administrations. Maximal effect was observed when doxorubicin was given 2 hours after NGR-TNF in the TS/A model as observed with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel in the RMA model (data not shown). Similar results were obtained also with melphalan in the WEHI-164 model. In this case, NGR-TNF (0.1 ng) alone could induce a 3- to 4-day delay in tumor growth. Synergistic effects were observed only when melphalan was given 2 hours after NGR-TNF. Apparently, the optimal administration schedule is independent from drug and model, suggesting a common mechanism of action in all models.

NGR-TNF does not increase the toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs as judged from the loss of animal weight. To provide information on toxicity caused by the combined treatments, we measured the animal weight, before and after treatment with the various drugs, for few days. No evidence of increased toxicity due to pretreatment with NGR-TNF was observed with all drug combinations in all models tested at least as judged from animal weight loss (data not shown). For instance, in the experiment reported in Fig. 2, the weight of mice before treatment and 1 day after treatment with gemcitabine (1.8 mg) were 21.5 ± 0.3 and 20.6 ± 0.2 g, respectively, whereas the weight of mice treated with NGR-TNF in combination with gemcitabine at 2 hours were 21.8 ± 0.3 and 21.1 ± 0.4 g, respectively. NGR-TNF alone caused no loss of weight.

Effect of NGR-TNF on the in vitro cytotoxic activity of chemotherapeutic drugs. To assess whether the synergistic effect between the various chemotherapeutic drugs and NGR-TNF in the RMA model was related to a direct mechanism of tumor cell killing or to an indirect mechanism, we then tested the effect of each drug alone or in combination with NGR-TNF in in vitro cytotoxicity assays. RMA cells were pretreated with NGR-TNF (1 ng/mL) for 2 hours and then with various doses of chemotherapeutic drugs. Cell viability was measured 48 hours later by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. All drugs, including cisplatin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, doxorubicin, and melphalan, were able to kill RMA cells although with different potency (Fig. 5A). Pretreatment of cells with NGR-TNF did not increase the cytotoxic effect of these drugs (Fig. 5B).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. In vitro cytotoxic activity of different chemotherapeutic drugs alone and in combination with NGR-TNF. RMA cells were treated for 48 hours with various doses of doxorubicin (Doxo), paclitaxel, melphalan, cisplatin, and gemcitabine (A). In another experiment, cells were pretreated for 2 hours with NGR-TNF (1 ng/mL) and then with various doses of chemotherapeutic drugs for 48 hours (B). Points, mean of four wells; bars, SD.

 
Similar experiments were carried out to assess whether the synergism with doxorubicin and melphalan in the TS/A and WEHI-164 models, respectively, was related to indirect mechanisms. Also in this case, no significant changes were induced by NGR-TNF in the cytotoxic effects of doxorubicin and melphalan on TS/A cells WEHI-164, respectively (data not shown).

Because RMA, TS/A, and WEHI-164 tumor cells are likely exposed to a lower dose of NGR-TNF in vivo (0.1 ng/mouse) compared with in vitro (1 ng/mL), these results suggest that the main mechanism of action of the in vivo synergism was related to an indirect effect presumably against components of the tumor vasculature.

To assess whether NGR-TNF could affect the cytotoxic activity of drugs against endothelial cells, we then analyzed the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin and melphalan against human umbilical vein endothelial cells. The cytotoxic activity of various doses of doxorubicin and melphalan was not changed by human NGR-TNF even when we used this cytokine at concentrations as high as 10 ng/mL in cell culture (data not shown).

Thus, increased tumor or endothelial cell cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs does not seem to be a major mechanism for the in vivo synergism with NGR-TNF.

Effect of NGR-TNF on RMA and WEHI-164 tumor perfusion. TNF is known to induce intravascular coagulation and vascular damage, leading to vessel occlusion. To investigate whether the decrease in the synergism with chemotherapeutic drugs given with >3-hour delay was related to vascular occlusion and, consequently, to decreased tumor perfusion, we have given 0.1 ng NGR-TNF to RMA and WEHI-164 tumor-bearing mice and, 2 or 5 hours later, patent blue, a nontoxic dye. As positive controls, some mice were treated with 10,000 ng NGR-TNF, a dose that can cause marked vascular damage and occlusion. The animals were sacrificed 5 minutes later and the amount of dye in the tumor was analyzed by spectrophotometric techniques. Whereas the high dose of NGR-TNF almost completely inhibited tumor perfusion, as expected, the low dose of NGR-TNF could not significantly inhibit tumor perfusion in both models (Fig. 6). In another experiment carried out in the RMA model, we tested the effect of heparin, an anticoagulant, on the combination with NGR-TNF/doxorubicin, the latter given with a 4-hour delay. Heparin (30 IU) was given 2 hours before doxorubicin. No synergism between NGR-TNF and doxorubicin was observed even when heparin was included in the treatment (data not shown). These results suggest that intravascular coagulation is not a major mechanism for the decreased synergism between NGR-TNF and chemotherapy observed at administration intervals greater than 2 hours.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6. Effect of NGR-TNF on tumor perfusion with patent blue. C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice bearing RMA or WEHI-164 tumors (diameter, 1.0-1.4 cm), respectively, were treated with murine NGR-TNF (0.1 or 10,000 ng) followed 2 or 5 hours later by patent blue. After 5 minutes, the animals were sacrificed and the tumors were excised, weighed, disaggregated, resuspended in PBS, and centrifuged. The amount of patent blue in tissue extract was then quantified by spectrophotometric measurements. The number of animals treated is indicated. Columns, mean; bars, SE. *, P < 0.05. Bottom, visual inspection of tumor sections 5 hours after treatment.

 
Effect of repeated treatment with NGR-TNF on the synergism with drugs. To assess whether the lack of synergism at >3-hour time points was related to tumor unresponsiveness to drugs or to NGR-TNF clearance from circulation, we have treated one group of tumor-bearing mice with NGR-TNF at time 0 hour followed by cisplatin at 2 and 4 hours later. In parallel, another group of mice received NGR-TNF at 0 and 2 hours and cisplatin at 2- and 4-hour time points. The response was greater in animals that received two treatments of NGR-TNF (Fig. 7), supporting the hypothesis that lack of synergism between NGR-TNF and cisplatin with 4-hour delay was due to NGR-TNF clearance.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 7. Effect of repeated treatments with NGR-TNF and chemotherapeutic drugs on RMA tumors. Tumor-bearing mice were treated at day 10 twice with 0.1 ng NGR-TNF alone or in combination with 40 µg cisplatin at the indicated times (A). A similar experiment was done in combination with 40 µg doxorubicin (B). Mice treated with NGR-TNF/cisplatin received a second treatment at day 20.

 
However, when a similar experiment was carried out with doxorubicin, the responses to one or two treatments with NGR-TNF were similar (Fig. 7), pointing to a different behavior of these drugs in repeated treatments.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In previous work, we have shown that a low dose (0.1 ng) of NGR-TNF is sufficient to increase the efficacy of melphalan and doxorubicin in animal models (9). The main finding of this work is that targeted delivery of a low amount of NGR-TNF to tumor vasculature can enhance the response of tumors to other drugs, including cisplatin, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel. These drugs act via different mechanisms: for instance, cisplatin is a DNA-damaging agent, gemcitabine is a pyrimidine analogue with antimetabolic activity, and paclitaxel is an antimicrotubule agent; moreover, melphalan is an antitumor alkylating agent and doxorubicin is a DNA intercalator and a topoisomerase interactive compound (16). Remarkably, the optimal administration schedule for maximal synergism required a 2-hour delay between NGR-TNF and chemotherapeutic drug administration irrespective of drug and tumor model used. Thus, the synergy, despite being strongly dependent on administration schedule, is apparently independent from the mechanism of cytotoxic activity and pharmacokinetics, the 2-hour delay being required for all drugs. We have also found that synergism occurs in vivo but not in in vitro cytotoxicity assays with cultured tumor cells. This suggest that the in vivo synergism is not related to an effect of NGR-TNF on tumor cells. More likely, NGR-TNF affects host components that are critical for the activity of all drugs tested.

Previous studies showed that TNF can rapidly increase endothelial permeability (17, 18) and can decrease interstitial fluid pressure in tumors (19), both believed to be important barriers for drug penetration in tumors (20). Tumor vessel damage and increased drug penetration are thought to be important mechanisms of the synergy between high doses of TNF with melphalan and doxorubicin in animal models and in patients (2, 3, 19, 21–23). This mechanism is likely to apply also for tumor vasculature-targeted TNF. According to this view, we have shown previously that preadministration of low doses of NGR-TNF (0.1 ng) increases the penetration of doxorubicin in murine B16 melanomas and RMA-T lymphomas (9). Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging of RMA tumors showed a larger leakage of ultrasmall iron oxide particles, a contrast agent, from the vasculature to the interstitium in NGR-TNF (0.1 ng)–treated tumors compared with controls (12). It is therefore possible that this mechanism occurs also with other chemotherapeutic drugs, such as cisplatin, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel. Likely, the optimal 2-hour delay is the time necessary for NGR-TNF to affect the tumor vessels and therefore is independent from the chemotherapeutic drug. However, other mechanisms could contribute to the synergism with chemotherapeutic drugs at 2-hour time points. For instance, it has been shown previously that administration of NGR-TNF (0.1 ng) to RMA tumor-bearing mice increases cell proliferation in tumor hypoxic areas possibly due to transient normalization of the vascular function in certain tumor areas (12). This effect was transient, lasting probably few hours, as we typically observed a reduction in tumor growth 1 day after treatment. Considering the importance of cell proliferation on chemotherapeutic drug activity, this mechanism could contribute, along with an increased vascular permeability and drug penetration, to the overall activity of drug combinations.

Why the effect of TNF is so short and synergism decreases at >3- to 4-hour time points? This phenomenon could have several explanations. For instance, it is well known that gap formation and endothelial barrier alteration can be followed by rapid recovery of barrier function through active processes (24). Second, NGR-TNF-induced vascular leakage, documented by magnetic resonance imaging measurements 2 hours after treatment (12), could lead, at later time points, to increased protein extravasation and increased interstitial pressure, which could reduce the transvascular transport of drugs in the tumor interstitium. Furthermore, given that TNF can induce intravascular coagulation (25), it is also possible that vessel occlusion and reduction of tumor perfusion reduce drug delivery. However, this mechanism is likely to play a minor role, as we observed significant vessel occlusion and inhibition of perfusion with patent blue only when mice were treated with a high dose of NGR-TNF (10 µg) and not with a low dose (0.1 ng). Furthermore, the synergism with doxorubicin was transient even when animals were treated with heparin.

The loss of synergism at times >3 to 4 hours could also be related to rapid clearance of NGR-TNF from circulation (8) and consequently to a decrease of its vascular effects. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that a second administration of NGR-TNF, 2 hours after the first, was synergistic with cisplatin given at 4-hour time point. This also implies that tumors do not became resistant to cisplatin 4 hours after NGR-TNF administration. In contrast, no synergism was observed with doxorubicin in a similar experiment, pointing to the importance of drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the synergism at 4 hours. To explain this behavior, we should keep in mind that different biological effects are likely induced by NGR-TNF at different time points, which may or may not affect chemotherapy depending on drug properties. For instance, increased protein extravasation and interstitial pressure could reduce the transvascular transport of drugs in the tumor interstitium depending on drug pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and plasma protein binding as well as tumor blood flow and oxygenation (26–30). Considering the different effects that hypoxia may induce on chemotherapeutic drug activity (31), this factor could also contribute to the differential behavior of these drugs at time points >3 to 4 hours.

In conclusion, we have shown that targeted delivery of low doses of NGR-TNF to the tumor vasculature can increase the efficacy of various chemotherapeutic drugs, in a transient manner, in different tumor models. Evidence was obtained to suggest that 2 hours is the time necessary for NGR-TNF to induce optimal biological effects independently from chemotherapeutic drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Rapid NGR-TNF clearance and changes in the tumor responsiveness could account for the lower synergism at later times in a manner depending on drug properties. The increase of efficacy was not accompanied by an increased toxicity at least as judged from the loss of animal weight. Considering that NGR-TNF is currently tested in clinical trials, this work could provide important information for designing clinical studies with NGR-TNF in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs.


   Footnotes
 
Grant support: Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro and Molmed S.p.A.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 5/26/05; revised 10/14/05; accepted 10/17/05.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Lienard D, Ewalenko P, Delmotte JJ, Renard N, Lejeune FJ. High-dose recombinant tumor necrosis factor {alpha} in combination with interferon {gamma} and melphalan in isolation perfusion of the limbs for melanoma and sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:52–60.
  2. Eggermont AM, Schraffordt Koops H, Lienard D, et al. Isolated limb perfusion with high-dose tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} in combination with interferon-{gamma} and melphalan for nonresectable extremity soft tissue sarcomas: a multicenter trial. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:2653–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Lejeune FJ. High dose recombinant tumour necrosis factor (rTNF {alpha}) administered by isolation perfusion for advanced tumours of the limbs: a model for biochemotherapy of cancer. Eur J Cancer 1995;31A:1009–16.
  4. Fraker DL, Alexander HR, Andrich M, Rosenberg SA. Treatment of patients with melanoma of the extremity using hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with melphalan, tumor necrosis factor, and interferon {gamma}: results of a tumor necrosis factor dose-escalation study. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:479–89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rossi CR, Foletto M, Di Filippo F, et al. Soft tissue limb sarcomas: Italian clinical trials with hyperthermic antiblastic perfusion. Cancer 1999;86:1742–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Eggermont AM, de Wilt JH, ten Hagen TL. Current uses of isolated limb perfusion in the clinic and a model system for new strategies. Lancet Oncol 2003;4:429–37.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Fraker DL, Alexander HR, Pass HI. Biologic therapy with TNF: systemic administration and isolation-perfusion. In: De Vita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg S, editors. Biologic therapy of cancer: principles and practice, Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co.; 1995. p. 329–45.
  8. Curnis F, Sacchi A, Borgna L, Magni F, Gasparri A, Corti A. Enhancement of tumor necrosis factor {alpha} antitumor immunotherapeutic properties by targeted delivery to aminopeptidase N (CD13). Nat Biotechnol 2000;18:1185–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Curnis F, Sacchi A, Corti A. Improving chemotherapeutic drug penetration in tumors by vascular targeting and barrier alteration. J Clin Invest 2002;110:475–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Pasqualini R, Koivunen E, Kain, R, et al. Aminopeptidase N is a receptor for tumor-homing peptides and a target for inhibiting angiogenesis. Cancer Res 2000;60:722–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Curnis F, Arrigoni G, Sacchi A, et al. Differential binding of drugs containing the NGR motif to CD13 isoforms in tumor vessels, epithelia, and myeloid cells. Cancer Res 2002;62:867–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. van Laarhoven H, Gambarota G, Heerschap A, et al. Early response measurements of NGR-TNF efficacy in murine lymphomas using magnetic resonance and immunohistochemical methods. Invest New Drugs. In press 2005.
  13. Moro M, Pelagi M, Fulci G, et al. Tumor cell targeting with antibody-avidin complexes and biotinylated tumor necrosis factor {alpha}. Cancer Res 1997;57:1922–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Curnis F, Gasparri A, Sacchi A, Cattaneo A, Magni F, Corti A. Targeted delivery of IFN{gamma} to tumor vessels uncouples antitumor from counterregulatory mechanisms. Cancer Res 2005;65:2906–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Gasparri A, Moro M, Curnis F, et al. Tumor pretargeting with avidin improves the therapeutic index of biotinylated tumor necrosis factor {alpha} in mouse models. Cancer Res 1999;59:2917–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Johnson SW, James PS, O'Dwyer PJ. Pharmacology of cancer chemotherapy. In: De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, editors. Cancer. Principles and practice of oncology. Taunton (MA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 363–452.
  17. Brett J, Gerlach H, Nawroth P, Steinberg S, Godman G, Stern D. Tumor necrosis factor/cachectin increases permeability of endothelial cell monolayers by a mechanism involving regulatory G proteins. J Exp Med 1989;169:1977–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Goldblum SE, Sun WL. Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} augments pulmonary arterial transendothelial albumin flux in vitro. Am J Physiol 1990;258:L57–67.
  19. Kristensen CA, Nozue M, Boucher Y, Jain RK. Reduction of interstitial fluid pressure after TNF-{alpha} treatment of three human melanoma xenografts. Br J Cancer 1996;74:533–6.[Medline]
  20. Jain RK. Barriers to drug delivery in solid tumors. Sci Am 1994;271:58–65.[Medline]
  21. van der Veen AH, de Wilt JH, Eggermont AM, van Tiel ST, Seynhaeve AL, ten Hagen TL. TNF-{alpha} augments intratumoural concentrations of doxorubicin in TNF-{alpha}-based isolated limb perfusion in rat sarcoma models and enhances anti-tumour effects. Br J Cancer 2000;82:973–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Suzuki S, Ohta S, Takashio K, Nitanai H, Hashimoto Y. Augmentation for intratumoral accumulation and anti-tumor activity of liposome-encapsulated Adriamycin by tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} in mice. Int J Cancer 1990;46:1095–100.[Medline]
  23. de Wilt JH, ten Hagen TL, de Boeck G, van Tiel ST, de Bruijn EA, Eggermont AM. Tumour necrosis factor {alpha} increases melphalan concentration in tumour tissue after isolated limb perfusion. Br J Cancer 2000;82:1000–3.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. McDonald DM. Endothelial gaps: plasma leakage during inflammation. News Physiol Sci 1998;13:104–5.[Free Full Text]
  25. Clauss M, Ryan J, Stern D. Modulation of endothelial cell hemostatic properties by TNF: insights into the role of endothelium in the host response to inflammatory stimuli. In: Beutler B, editor. Tumor necrosis factors: the molecules and their emerging roles in medicine. New York: Raven Press; 1992. p. 49–63.
  26. Heldin CH, Rubin K, Pietras K, Ostman A. High interstitial fluid pressure—an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:806–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Jain RK. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 2005;307:58–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Jang SH, Wientjes MG, Lu D, Au JL. Drug delivery and transport to solid tumors. Pharm Res 2003;20:1337–50.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. McDonald DM, Baluk P. Significance of blood vessel leakiness in cancer. Cancer Res 2002;62:5381–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yuan F. Transvascular drug delivery in solid tumors. Semin Radiat Oncol 1998;8:164–75.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Harrison L, Blackwell K. Hypoxia and anemia: factors in decreased sensitivity to radiation therapy and chemotherapy? Oncologist 2004;9:31–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BloodHome page
A. Corti, F. Curnis, W. Arap, and R. Pasqualini
The neovasculature homing motif NGR: more than meets the eye
Blood, October 1, 2008; 112(7): 2628 - 2635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
F. Curnis, A. Sacchi, A. Gasparri, R. Longhi, A. Bachi, C. Doglioni, C. Bordignon, C. Traversari, G.-P. Rizzardi, and A. Corti
Isoaspartate-Glycine-Arginine: A New Tumor Vasculature-Targeting Motif
Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 7073 - 7082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
L. Crippa, A. Gasparri, A. Sacchi, E. Ferrero, F. Curnis, and A. Corti
Synergistic Damage of Tumor Vessels with Ultra Low-Dose Endothelial-Monocyte Activating Polypeptide-II and Neovasculature-Targeted Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}
Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 68(4): 1154 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sacchi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Corti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sacchi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Corti, A.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online