Clinical Cancer Research Bridging the Lab and the Clinic in Cancer Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Myers, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Myers, J. N.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 12, 4755-4765, August 1, 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research


Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Growth-Inhibitory Effects of Human Anti-Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Receptor Antibody (A12) in an Orthotopic Nude Mouse Model of Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma

Zhuoying Wang1, Geetika Chakravarty1, Seungwon Kim1, Yasemin D. Yazici1, Maher N. Younes1, Samar A. Jasser1, Alfredo A. Santillan1, Corazon D. Bucana2, Adel K. El-Naggar3 and Jeffrey N. Myers1,2

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Head and Neck Surgery, 2 Cancer Biology, and 3 Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Requests for reprints: Jeffrey N. Myers, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 441, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone: 713-792-6920; Fax: 713-794-4662. E-mail: jmyers{at}mdanderson.org.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: The insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) and its ligands have been implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of various cancers, including those arising in the thyroid gland. We therefore evaluated whether the IGF-IR could serve as a potential target for therapy of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC).

Experimental Design: The expression and activation of the IGF-IR and some of its downstream signaling pathway components were evaluated in both human thyroid cancer specimens and thyroid cancer cell lines. The therapeutic potential of a humanized monoclonal antibody (A12) directed against IGF-IR was assessed in vitro and in vivo in an orthotopic model of ATC. Tumor volume and overall survival time were analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of A12 in vivo.

Results: IGF-IR was overexpressed in 94% of the thyroid cancers. Blockade of IGF-IR with A12 was effective in attenuating IGF-IR signaling both in vitro and in vivo. However, the inhibitory effects of A12 on cell proliferation were cell line dependent, as those ATC cell lines that had detectable levels of pIGF-IR were more sensitive to A12 treatment. A12 was equally effective in vivo, where it brought ~57% (P = 0.041) inhibition in tumor volume. The concomitant use of A12 and irinotecan produced additive effects and resulted in a 93% (P < 0.001) reduction in tumor volume. Blocking IGF-IR blocked Akt phosphorylation and decreased proliferation and microvessel density but increased apoptosis within the tumor xenografts. Our results also highlighted a previously undefined IGF-IR-mediated antiangiogenic effect on tumor-associated endothelium in thyroid cancers.

Conclusion: Blocking the IGF-IR with A12 seems to be a potential avenue for treating patients with ATC by its direct antitumor effects and its effects on the tumor vasculature.


In 2005, it was estimated that there would be 25,690 new cases of thyroid cancer in the United States, which is a substantial increase over the number of cases in 2003 (1). Recent American Cancer Society statistics suggest that it would jump a further 17% to ~30,180 cases in 2006. Although anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) constitutes only 1.6% of all thyroid cancers, it accounts for ~30% of thyroid cancer deaths. Even when patients with ATC receive aggressive multimodal therapy (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy), ~80% die within ~7 months as a result of local invasion and distant metastasis, especially those patients >60 years old (2, 3). Thus, novel therapeutic approaches are needed to improve the outcome of these patients (4).

Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) is a ubiquitous transmembrane tyrosine kinase composed of two extracellular {alpha} subunits and two intracellular ß subunits (510). IGF-IRß transmits a ligand-induced signal by phosphorylating its substrates, mainly insulin receptor substrate-I (IRS-I). IGF-IR has been proven to mediate the mitogenic and antiapoptotic properties of its ligands, IGF-I and IGF-II, principally through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, in a variety of human cancers (1125).

Targeted therapy consisting of IGF-binding proteins with human monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors against IGF-IR have been developed, and studies of these have yielded encouraging results both in vitro and in vivo. These anti-IGF-IR-targeted treatments have been shown to significantly decrease migration, invasion, metastatic spread, and angiogenesis in tumor models. The inhibition of IGF-IR can also enhance the sensitivity of cancer cells to radiation or chemotherapeutic agents (2636). These data suggest that targeted therapy directed at the IGF-IR given in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both could be an attractive new treatment strategy for cancer patients (13).

A12 is a high-affinity, fully human IgG1{lambda} mAb that specifically binds to human IGF-IR and blocks IGF-I and IGF-II signaling but does not block the binding of insulin to the insulin receptor. It has been shown to inhibit the growth of breast, colon, and pancreatic cancer cell lines both in vitro and in s.c. tumor nude mouse models by antibody-mediated blockade of ligand binding to IGF-IR. In a study of a xenograft tumor model, A12 produced a marked increase in apoptosis with minimal toxicity (27).

Given previous studies showing the up-regulation of components of the IGF-I signaling pathway, we evaluated human thyroid tissue microarrays and found consistently higher IGF-IR levels in thyroid tumors than in normal thyroid tissue. These findings led us to hypothesize that targeting the IGF-IR could be an effective strategy for the management of ATC. We tested our hypothesis both in vitro and in vivo by treating ATC tumor cells with the A12 antibody alone and in combination with the cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drug irinotecan.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell lines and culture conditions. The ATC cell lines ARO, DRO, Hth74, KAT4, and KAT18; papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) cell lines NPA187 and TPC-1; follicular thyroid cancer cell line WRO; and medullary thyroid cancer cell line TT were used. The cells were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin, sodium pyruvate, and nonessential amino acids. Adherent monolayer cultures were maintained on plastic and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 and 95% air. The cultures were free of Mycoplasma species. The cultures were maintained no longer than 12 weeks after recovery from frozen stocks.

Animals and maintenance. Male athymic nude mice, 8 to 12 weeks old, were purchased from the Animal Production Area of the National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center (Frederick, MD). The mice were housed and maintained in laminar flow cabinets under specific pathogen-free conditions in facilities approved by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care in accordance with current regulations and standards of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the NIH. The mice were used in accordance with the Animal Care and Use Guidelines of The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) under a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Reagents. A12 antibody was generously provided by ImClone Systems, Inc. (New York, NY). For in vitro administration, A12 was dissolved in PBS to a concentration of 10 mg/mL and further diluted to an appropriate final concentration in RPMI 1640 with 2% FBS or without FBS. For in vivo testing, A12 was dissolved in PBS to achieve a final concentration of 4 mg/mL just before giving it to the mice. Irinotecan (Camptosar, Pharmacia and Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, MI) was diluted in PBS to a concentration of 5 mg/mL for i.p. injections. Propidium iodide and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were both purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO).

The following antibodies were used: anti-IGF-IRß (C-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA); anti-pIGF-IR (Tyr1131)/IR (Tyr1146), anti-IRS-I, anti-pIRS-I (Ser307), anti-Akt, anti-pAkt (Ser473), anti-MAPK mouse mAb (p42), and anti-pMAPK (Tyr42/Tyr44; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA); anti-human IGF-I mAb (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN); anti-ß-actin (Sigma-Aldrich); mouse anti–proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) clone PC-10 (DAKO A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark); rat anti-mouse CD31/platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 and rat anti-mouse CD31 peroxidase-conjugated rat anti-mouse IgG1 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA); peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG and peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG1 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA); peroxidase-conjugated rat anti-mouse IgG2a (Serotec; Harlan Bioproducts for Science, Inc., Indianapolis, IN); Hoechst dye 3342 molecular weight 615.9 (Hoechst, Warrington, PA); and Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated goat anti-rat IgG and Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR).

A terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay was done with a commercial apoptosis detection kit (Promega Corp., Madison, WI).

Western blotting. To study IGF-IR expression and autophosphorylation in different thyroid cancer cell lines, extracts of total cell proteins were obtained from the ARO, DRO, Hth74, KAT4, KAT18, WRO, NPA187, TPC-1, and TT cells. Cells were washed with PBS and lysed in buffer containing 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 2% (v/v) NP40, 100 nmol/L NaF, 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 mmol/L aprotinin-leupeptin-trypsin inhibitor, and 2 mmol/L sodium orthovanadate. The samples were diluted in sample buffer [10% SDS, 0.5 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 1 mol/L DTT, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1% bromophenol blue] and boiled. Proteins (50 µg) were resolved by PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 in TBS for 30 minutes, probed with anti-pIGF-IRß antibody (1:1,000), anti-IGF-IRß antibody (C-20; 1:4,000), and anti-ß-actin antibody (1:5,000) diluted in 1% bovine serum albumin overnight, and incubated with secondary horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:3,000) in 1% bovine serum albumin for 1 hour at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL).

Western immunoblotting was done to show that A12 is able to inhibit the phosphorylation of IGF-IRß, IRS-I, Akt, and MAPK in vitro. For these studies, ARO cells were incubated in serum-free medium for 24 hours and either treated with 0.1 to 100 nmol/L A12 for next 2 hours or incubated with A12 at the same concentration (50 nmol/L) from 30 minutes to 6 hours before the addition of IGF-I or IGF-II (10 nmol/L; R&D Systems) for 15 minutes. Briefly, proteins (50 µg) were resolved by PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes as described earlier. The membranes were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 minutes; probed with anti-pIGF-IRß antibody (1:1,000), anti-IGF-IRß antibody (C-20; 1:4,000), anti-pIRS-I antibody (1:1,000), anti-IRS-I antibody (1:1,000), anti-pAkt antibody (1:2,000), anti-Akt antibody (1:2,000), anti-pMAPK antibody (1:3,000), anti-MAPK mouse antibody (1:2,000), and anti-ß-actin antibody (1:5,000); and incubated with secondary horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:3,000) for 1 hour at room temperature. For anti-MAPK immunoblotting, the blots were incubated with a goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody that was conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:3,000) for 1 hour at room temperature.

Measurement of cell proliferation and cell death. We used a MTT assay to test the ability of A12 to inhibit the proliferation of TC cell lines in vitro. Approximately 2 x 103 cells per well were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS in 96-well tissue culture plates. After 24 hours, the cells were treated with various concentrations of A12 (0.1-100 nmol/L) in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2% FBS. To measure the number of metabolically active cells after a 3-day incubation period, a MTT assay was done. Absorbance at 570 nm was recorded with a 96-well microtiter plate reader (MR-5000, Dynatech Laboratories, Inc., Chantilly, VA).

To measure the extent of cell death, ARO and DRO cells were plated at a density of 2 x 105 per well in 38-mm2 six-well plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) and maintained for 24 hours before treatment with A12. After 24 hours, A12 was added in various concentrations (0-100 nmol/L) in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2% FBS. After 48 hours of treatment with A12, the extent of cell death was determined by propidium iodide staining of hypodiploid DNA in Nicoletti buffer (50 µg/mL propidium iodide, 0.1% sodium citrate, 0.1% Triton X-100) for 20 minutes at 4°C. Cell cycle data were then analyzed by flow cytometry, and the sub-G0-G1 fraction was measured using Multicycle System (Phoenix Flow System, San Diego, CA).

Immunohistochemistry on human thyroid cancer tissue arrays and murine tumor tissue sections. Immunohistochemistry was done with the following antibodies: anti-pIGF-IRß, anti-IGF-IRß, anti-IGF-I, anti-pAkt, anti-Akt, anti-pMAPK, anti-MAPK, PCNA, CD31/platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1, and CD31/TUNEL. For IGF-I, IGF-IRß, and PCNA staining, paraffin-embedded sections were dewaxed and treated with pepsin for 20 minutes at 37°C. After blocking the endogenous peroxidases, the specimens were treated with a protein-blocking solution (5% horse serum with 1% goat serum) for 1 hour at room temperature. Primary antibody (1:50 dilution) treatment was carried out at 4°C overnight. The slides were blocked again with protein-blocking solution for 1 hour and incubated with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated anti-rabbit antibody at a 1:200 dilution for 1 hour at room temperature. The slides were then washed in PBS and incubated with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine for 10 minutes. After the excess 3,3'-diaminobenzidine was washed off, counterstaining was done with Gill's no. 3 hematoxylin.

For staining with antibodies against pIGF-IRß, pAkt, Akt, pMAPK, MAPK, and CD31/platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1, 8- to 10-mm-thick frozen sections were stained according to methods described previously (37). p-IGF-IR, pMAPK, and total MAPK antibodies were used at 1:100 dilution; pAkt, total Akt, and CD31/platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 antibodies were used at 1:400 dilution. All antibody treatments were for 18 hours at 4°C.

For pIGF-IRß, pMAPK, total MAPK, pAkt, and total Akt, the samples were then incubated with Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG at 1:400; for CD31/platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1, the samples were incubated with Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated goat anti-rat IgG at 1:400 for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark. Samples were counterstained with 300 µg/mL Hoechst dye for 1 to 2 minutes at room temperature and then mounted using propyl gallate.

TUNEL staining was done according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. Red and green fluorescent images were acquired using a Zeiss Axioplan2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) equipped with a 100-W HBO mercury bulb and the requisite filter sets (Chroma, Inc., Brattleboro, VT). Images were captured using a C5810 Hamamatsu color-chilled three-chip charge-coupled device camera (Hamamatsu, Tokyo, Japan) and digitized using imaging software (Optimas, Silver Spring, MD). The 3,3'-diaminobenzidine-stained, paraffin-embedded sections were examined under a Microphot-FX microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY) equipped with a three-chip charge-coupled device color video camera (model DXC990, Sony Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

For quantitative analysis of PCNA and CD31, the mean positive area and mean positive intensity were quantified in five random 0.159-mm2 fields (magnification, x100) per slide from a total of five slides per study group using the Image-Pro Plus software package (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Silver Spring, MD). For TUNEL staining quantification, the labeled cells were counted in five random 0.159-mm2 fields (magnification, x100) per slide from a total of five slides per study group.

The photomontages were prepared using Photoshop software (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA).

Effects of A12 and irinotecan on the growth of orthotopic ATC xenografts in nude mice. Orthotopic xenografts in nude mice were established as described previously (37, 38). Briefly, ARO cells were harvested from subconfluent cultures by trypsinization. ARO cells (5 x 105) were then injected into the right thyroid lobe of each mouse in an injection volume of 5 µL using a 30-gauge needle. On the fifth day after their inoculation, five mice were euthanized to confirm establishment of the tumor mass with H&E staining. The orthotopically implanted tumors showed a 100% "take" rate in this pilot study (37). Consequently, for all subsequent studies, 5 x 105 ARO cells were implanted orthotopically and tumors were allowed to grow for the next 4 days and then randomized into different treatment groups.

For this study, they were randomized into four study groups of 10 mice each. The drugs were given as follows: (a) A12 via i.p. injection, 1 mg/injection, in 250 µL volume twice weekly; (b) irinotecan via i.p. injection at 50 mg/kg in 250 µL volume once weekly; (c) both A12 1 mg/i.p. injection twice weekly and irinotecan 50 mg/kg via i.p. injection in 250 µL volume once weekly; and (d) 250 µL PBS via i.p. injection once weekly as a placebo. The twice weekly injection regimen of 4 mg/mL A12 was determined following Burtrum et al. (27), who have shown that the half-life of A12 is 4 days in mice.4

A12 treatment on mice was continued for 3 weeks and their weights were recorded twice weekly. Our animal care and use protocol required that the animals be killed if they lost >20% of their body weight or if they became moribund. However, all the animals maintained their weights, and none had to be killed before the end of the treatment period. At the end of the 3-week treatment period, the mice were killed by CO2 asphyxiation, and necropsy was done. The cervical lymph node, the lungs, and the thyroid tumors were removed during the necropsy, sectioned and stained with H&E, and examined for the presence of metastasis. At the time of the necropsy, the tumors were measured in three dimensions. The volumes of the tumors were determined using the formula: V = 4 / 3({pi})XYZ, where X, Y, and Z are the perpendicular radii of the tumors in each dimension. To ensure the immunohistochemical detection of pIGF-IR and pAkt, the last doses of A12 and irinotecan were given 2 hours before the mice were to be killed at the end of the 3-week treatment period. The percentage of tumor inhibition was calculated according to the formula: [1 – (T / C)] x 100, where T and C are the mean tumor volumes of the treatment group and the control group, respectively.

For immunohistochemical and routine H&E staining, one part of the tumor was fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. The other part was embedded in OCT compound (Miles Inc., Elkhart, IN), flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C.

Effects of A12 and irinotecan on the survival of nude mice bearing orthotopic ATC xenografts. Orthotopic ATC xenografts were established in nude mice as described above. Each group of mice (control, A12, irinotecan, and combination) was treated with PBS, A12, irinotecan, or both agents as described in the previous section. The mice were weighed twice weekly and killed if they showed a weight loss of >20% or appeared moribund. The mice were treated for 6 weeks.

Statistical analyses. Associations between normal and thyroid cancer for IGF-IR expression were tested with {chi}2 test. Best-fit curves were generated for the MTT and propidium iodide assays and used to determine the IC50. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to detect the difference in tumor volume between the four groups of mice. Pairwise comparisons between each treatment and control group and between treatments were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between the treatment and control groups were compared with the log-rank test. Quantified results of PCNA, CD31, and TUNEL staining were compared by an independent-samples t test. A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were done using Stata 9.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IGF-IR is frequently overexpressed in human thyroid cancers. To determine the expression level of IGF-IR in normal and neoplastic human thyroid tissue, tissue arrays and surgical specimens composed of normal thyroid, ATC, and PTC (obtained from the Department of Surgical Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center) were stained with IGF-IR. None of the 8 normal thyroid tissue specimens stained positively for IGF-IRß, whereas 49 of 52 specimens of thyroid cancer stained positively. The intensity of staining ranged from + to +++ (+, low; ++, moderate; +++, high). In comparison with the normal thyroid tissue specimens, the positive staining rates of ATC (37 of 39) and PTC (12 of 13) specimens revealed statistically significant differences in IGF-IR expression (P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were noted between ATC-positive and PTC-positive staining (Fig. 1A ; Table 1 ).


Figure 1
View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. IGF-IR expression in human thyroid cancer tissue arrays and thyroid cancer cell lines. A, human tissue array containing normal thyroid tissue and different histologic types of thyroid cancers stained with IGF-IRß antibody. Note that the normal thyroid had no staining for IGF-IRß, but both PTC and ATC specimens were positive for IGF-IRß (brown) expression. Magnification, x100. B, additional paraffin-embedded slides of normal thyroid, PTC, follicular carcinoma (FTC), and ATC stained with IGF-I and IGF-IRß. The normal thyroid tissue was weak positive for IGF-I and negative for IGF-IRß; however, as noted in the tissue array samples, the specimens of PTC, follicular carcinoma, and ATC were strong positive for both IGF-I and IGF-IRß. C, Western blot analysis was done on different thyroid cancer cell lines in 10% FBS growth medium. All 11 cell lines expressed IGF-IRß. D, ARO, DRO, C643, Hth74, ATC-A, and KAT4 cells were incubated with or without IGF-I (10 nmol/L) for 15 minutes after 24 hours of serum starvation and probed with total and pIGF-IRß antibody. Increase of pIGF-IRß expression after IGF-I stimulation was noted in ARO, DRO, and C643 cells but not in Hth74, ATC-A, and KAT4 cells. To ensure equal loading, the blots were reprobed with actin antibody.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Level of immunohistochemical staining for IGF-IR in normal thyroid and PTC and ATC tissues from 60 human surgical samples (including tissue array and permanent pathologic slides)

 
We also evaluated the distribution and abundance of IGF-I by immunohistochemical analysis of human thyroid cancers with different histopathologic characteristics. Immunoreactive IGF-I was present in all the thyroid tissues examined, being lowest in the normal tissues and highest in the thyroid carcinomas studied (Fig. 1B).

Having established that the components of the IGF pathway are indeed overexpressed in human thyroid cancer, our next objective was to choose a thyroid carcinoma cell line with which the antitumor activity of A12 could be tested.

Selected thyroid cancer cell lines have an intact IGF-I signaling axis. Western blot analysis was used to determine the expression of IGF-IR and its phosphorylation in nine human thyroid cancer cell lines. All of these cell lines expressed IGF-IRß (Fig. 1C). However, when we specifically assessed the ability of ATC cell lines to respond to IGF-I treatment, only three of the six ATC cell lines responded with phosphorylation of the IGF-IRß subunit (Fig. 1D). The remaining three cell lines (Hth74, KAT4, and ATC-A) did not respond to IGF-I stimulation, although they expressed measurable levels of the total receptor. Further studies were done on one of the pIGF-IR-positive cell lines (ARO).

A12 inhibits IGF-IR signaling pathways stimulated by IGF-I and IGF-II. To assess the ability of A12 to inhibit IGF-I-stimulated or IGF-II-stimulated IGF-IR signaling, serum-starved ARO cells were treated for 2 hours with various concentrations of A12 and then stimulated with IGF-I or IGF-II in serum-free medium for 15 minutes. Cell lysis and Western blotting for the phosphorylated forms of IGF-IR, IRS-I, Akt, and MAPK revealed that, at a concentration of 100 nmol/L, A12 completely inhibited both IGF-I-induced and IGF-II-induced phosphorylation of IGF-IR. In addition, at concentrations of 1 and 50 nmol/L, A12 inhibited IGF-I-induced and IGF-II-induced phosphorylation of IRS-I, Akt, and MAPK (Fig. 2A ). ARO cells treated for different times with the same dose of A12 (50 nmol/L) also showed pIGF-IRß inhibition (Fig. 2B). However, the inhibitory effects of A12 seemed to be independent of down-regulation of the receptor levels, as we failed to see A12-mediated down-regulation of the receptor when the cells were concomitantly treated with IGF-I. Similar findings have been reported for breast cancer cells (27). It was equally intriguing to note that 10 times more A12 was required to inhibit the IGF-II-mediated than the IGF-I-mediated signaling.


Figure 2
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. A12 can inhibit IGF-IR signaling in ARO cells. A, dose-dependent inhibition of IGF-I-induced and IGF-II-induced IGF-IRß, IRS-I, Akt, and MAPK autophosphorylation with A12 treatment as described in Materials and Methods. B, time-dependent inhibition of IGF-I-induced and IGF-II-induced phosphorylation of IGF-IRß in ARO cells after treatment with A12. Serum-starved ARO cells were treated with A12 (50 nmol/L) for different amounts of time (30 minutes to 6 hours) incubated with or without IGF-I or IGF-II (10 nmol/L) for 10 minutes and analyzed by Western blotting.

 
A12 can inhibit the proliferative potential of some thyroid cancer cell lines in vitro. To assess the universality of the effects of A12 treatment, MTT assays were done on different thyroid cancer cell lines. Owing to our previous experience with IGF-mediated phosphorylation of the receptor, we anticipated that A12 might inhibit the growth of ARO, DRO, and C643 cells but might not inhibit that of Hth74, KAT4, and ATC-A cells.

The MTT assay results strongly supported our hypothesis, because increasing concentrations of A12 with or without IGF-I inhibited the proliferation of ARO, DRO, and C643 cells (Fig. 3A and B ), whereas the other three cell lines either failed to respond or responded minimally to A12 treatment. These results were also confirmed by determining cell counts 72 hours after treatment with A12 (data not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Antiproliferative effects of A12 on ATC cell lines in vitro. A, ATC cell lines ARO, DRO, C643, Hth74, ATC-A, and KAT4 ATC cell lines were plated on 96-well plates at 2,000 cells per well. Twenty-four hours after plating, the cells were treated with increasing concentrations of A12 (0-100 nmol/L) without (A) or with (B) IGF-I stimulation for 72 hours. The inhibitory effect of A12 was then measured using a MTT assay. C, A12 induced the apoptosis of ATC cell lines in vitro. The ATC cell lines ARO and DRO were plated on a six-well plate at 2 x 104 cells per well. Twenty-four hours after plating, the cells were treated with A12 (0-100 nmol/L) for 48 hours. The cells were then collected, stained with propidium iodide, and analyzed for apoptotic function by flow cytometry. OD, absorbance.

 
To further assess whether the growth-inhibitory effects of A12 treatment were primarily due to the induction of apoptosis, we evaluated its apoptotic effects in the ARO and DRO cell lines using a flow cytometry–based assay for hypodiploid cells. After 48 hours of A12 treatment, apoptosis was induced only minimally (<10%) in both ARO and DRO cell lines (Fig. 3C), suggesting that additional pathways of inhibition may be triggered by A12 in vitro.

A12 treatment inhibits xenograft growth and prolongs animal survival in an orthotopic nude mice model of ATC. Preclinical efficacy of A12 as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy was evaluated in a nude mouse model of ATC. Once ATC tumors were established by orthotopic implantation, animals were randomized into four treatment groups of 10 mice each: placebo (control), A12, irinotecan, and A12 plus irinotecan. Treatment with A12 or irinotecan alone led to a 57% and 80% decrease, respectively, in the tumor volume of ARO ATC xenografts. The differences in the tumor volume compared with the control group were statistically significant (P = 0.041 for A12 and P = 0.004 for irinotecan, respectively). However, the highest growth inhibition was achieved by the coadministration of A12 plus irinotecan. At the end of the 3-week treatment period, the mice treated with A12 plus irinotecan showed a 93% decrease in the estimated tumor volume compared with the control group (P = 0.0002). The decrease in the tumor volume in the mice receiving the combination treatment was also significantly greater than that of the groups receiving A12 or irinotecan alone (P < 0.01; Fig. 4A and B ).


Figure 4
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. In vivo effects of A12 on tumor growth and survival time of ATC xenografts in an orthotopic athymic nude mouse model of ATC. A, ARO cells were injected into the right thyroid lobe of the mice. Four days after injection, the mice were randomized into four groups (10 mice in each group), and the drugs were given according to the doses described in Materials and Methods. After 3 weeks of treatment, all the mice were killed, and necropsy was done. B, at the end of the growth inhibition study, the tumors were measured in three dimensions, and the mean tumor volumes were calculated in each group. *, P = 0.041, compared with the control group; {dagger}, P = 0.004, compared with the control group; {ddagger}, P = 0.0002, compared with the control group; P < 0.01, compared with the A12-alone and irinotecan-alone groups (independent t test). C, combined treatment of A12 + irinotecan significantly prolonged the survival rate in the orthotopic nude mouse model ATC compared with that of the control group (P = 0.0021).

 
It is important to note that although A12 is a fully human mAb (IgG1{lambda}) it was well tolerated by the animals with no substantial adverse effects. The weights of the animals remained constant throughout the treatment period (data not shown) and none of the animals had to be killed before the end of the study.

In the survival study, the survival rate of the mice treated with the combination was significantly greater than that of the mice in the control group (P = 0.0021). The combination group also achieved a greater survival rate than the mice treated with A12 alone (P = 0.004). However, there was no significant improvement in the survival rate between the groups treated with A12 alone or irinotecan alone when compared with the control group (P = 0.578 and 0.0955, respectively). Similarly, treatment with irinotecan alone was not superior to the combination treatment (P = 0.1015) or treatment with A12 alone (P = 0.1710; Fig. 4C).

A12 inhibits IGF-IRß and Akt phosphorylation in vivo. To show in vivo inhibition of IGF-IRß autophosphorylation by A12, immunohistochemical staining was done with antibodies specific to both IGF-IRß and pIGF-IRß. Tumors from all the study groups showed similar levels of total IGF-IRß expression, but the pIGF-IRß levels were decreased only in the tumors of the mice treated with A12 alone or in combination with irinotecan. To determine whether the blockade of IGF-IRß down-regulated its downstream signaling pathway, tumors from the four groups were stained with antibodies specific to Akt and pAkt. Although the level of total Akt expression was similar in all the study groups, pAkt staining was decreased only in the tumors of mice treated with A12 either alone or in combination with irinotecan (Fig. 5A ).


Figure 5
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. A12 inhibits IGF-IR signaling in vivo by inhibiting pAkt resulting in reduced proliferation and up-regulation of apoptosis in ARO tumor xenografts: immunohistochemical analysis of ARO tumor sections treated with A12 + irinotecan or A12 alone. A, after 3 weeks of treatment, ARO tumors in all four groups were sectioned and stained for pIGF-IR, IGF-IRß, pAkt, and Akt. Treatment with A12 alone or in combination with irinotecan inhibited the phosphorylation of IGF-IR (green) and Akt (green). The levels of expression for total IGF-IRß and Akt were similar throughout the study groups. Magnification, x100. B, tumor sections were stained for PCNA, TUNEL, and CD31. Tumors from mice treated with irinotecan, A12 alone, or A12 + irinotecan had decreased expression of PCNA (brown). Apoptosis levels were increased in the tumors of the groups treated with A12 alone and the combination treatment as determined by TUNEL (green). Tumors treated with A12 alone or A12 + irinotecan had decreased CD31 (brown) and pIGF-IR (yellow) of the tumor-associated endothelial cells in a double-labeled staining of CD31/pIGF-IR. C, PCNA staining decreased in the group of mice treated with irinotecan alone ({dagger}, P = 0.065, both in mean positive area and P < 0.05 in mean positive density compared with the control group), the group treated with A12 alone ({ddagger}, P < 0.05, both compared with control group), and the group treated with A12 + irinotecan (¶, P < 0.01, both compared with the control group). The CD31 staining decreased in mice treated with A12 alone (b, P < 0.01, both in mean CD31+ area and mean positive density compared with control group) and the group treated with A12 + irinotecan (c, P < 0.01, compared with the control group). a, P > 0.05, no statistical difference between the group treated with irinotecan alone and the control group.

 
A12 decreases cell proliferation, induces apoptosis, and inhibits tumor angiogenesis in ATC tumors in vivo. To determine the effect of A12 on cell proliferation, tumors were stained with antibodies to PCNA. The PCNA levels analyzed in terms of both mean positive area and mean positive intensity showed a significant decrease in the number of tumors in the groups receiving the irinotecan alone (P < 0.05), A12 alone (P < 0.05), and combination treatment compared with the control group (P < 0.01; Fig. 5B and C).

To assess the degree of intratumoral apoptosis, the tumor sections were stained using the TUNEL method (Fig. 5B). The mean ± SD numbers of apoptotic cells per unit area in the tumors of control mice and the mice treated with irinotecan were 8.5 ± 4.3 and 12.5 ± 6.2, respectively (P = 0.127). However, treatment with A12 alone or A12 plus irinotecan significantly increased the mean numbers of apoptotic cells per unit area to 24.2 ± 9.9 and 25.9 ± 15.4 compared with the control (P < 0.01) and irinotecan-only (P < 0.05) groups.

Microvessel density was determined by staining tumor sections with anti-CD31 antibodies. Treatment with irinotecan did not affect tumor microvessel density compared with the control group. However, treatment with A12 alone or in combination with irinotecan resulted in a statistically significant inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis in both mean positive area and mean positive intensity compared with the control group (P < 0.01; Fig. 5B and C).

We also used double-labeled immunohistochemical techniques to stain for CD31 and pIGF-IRß on endothelial cells in the tumor sections. The tumors from the control group or those treated with irinotecan alone showed strong colabeling of fluorescent red anti-CD31 staining specific for endothelial cells and fluorescent green staining of pIGF-IRß. In contrast, the phosphorylation of IGF-IRß in endothelial cells was significantly suppressed in the tumors of mice treated with A12 alone or in combination with irinotecan (Fig. 6 ). This was an important observation. More so, the A12 antibody was raised against human IGF-IR but also seems to act on mouse endothelial IGF-IR, suggesting that it may have more widespread ramifications. The total IGF-IRß level showed no change in the double staining of CD31/total IGF-IRß (data not shown).


Figure 6
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Double-labeled immunohistochemical analysis for CD31 and pIGF-IRß on endothelial cells in the tumor sections. The tumors from the control group or those treated with irinotecan alone showed strong colabeling of anti-CD31 staining specific for endothelial cells and pIGF-IRß staining (yellow). In contrast, the phosphorylation of IGF-IRß in endothelial cells was significantly suppressed in the tumors of mice treated with A12 alone or in combination with irinotecan.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have shown that the anti-IGF-IR antibody A12 inhibited the growth of ATC cells in vitro by blocking IGF-IR signaling. In vivo, A12 combined with irinotecan inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival in an orthotopic ATC athymic nude mouse model by suppressing the phosphorylation of IGF-IR and Akt and inducing the apoptosis of tumor cells. In addition, we showed for the first time that A12 can down-regulate IGF-IR phosphorylation in tumor-associated endothelial cells, which can contribute to an additional antiangiogenic effect.

The IGF-I receptor is one of several growth factor receptors implicated in cancer development and progression of various human tumors. The IGFs and IGF-IR signaling thus became an attractive target for new therapeutic strategies in cancer treatment (21, 22). In this study, we assessed IGF-IR expression in both human thyroid cancer specimens and thyroid cancer cell lines. Immunohistochemical analysis showed significantly higher expression of this receptor in human PTC and ATC specimens than in normal thyroid tissue. Using Western blot analysis, we corroborated these findings in thyroid cancer cell lines as well. Our results were similar to those of Belfiore et al. (9) and Vella et al. (10), thus supporting the notion that IGF-IR plays an important role in the progression of ATC.

Interestingly, our Western blot analysis of IGF-I-mediated autophosphorylation of the receptor indicated that although all ATC cell lines expressed detectable levels of IGF-IRß subunit only some of those cell lines autophosphorylated the receptor in response to IGF-I treatment. One possible reason may be that these cell lines harbor or activate specific phosphatases that can continuously dephosphorylate IGF-IR, thereby rendering it nonfunctional and forcing the cells to adapt IGF-independent survival pathways. Our in vitro studies support this hypothesis as in both MTT and cell-counting assays; A12 induced antiproliferative effects only on the ATC cell lines ARO, DRO, and C643 in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the Hth74, KAT4, and ATC-A cell lines failed to phosphorylate the receptor as well as failed to respond to A12 treatment.

However, the levels of pIGF-IR may not be the only determinant of A12 responsiveness even within the group of responsive cell lines; C643 cells are 10-fold more sensitive to growth inhibition by A12 compared with ARO and DRO cells. All three of these cell lines express similar levels of IGF-IR and pIGF-IR. Additional cues of A12 responsiveness may thus be obtained by further exploring the biology of C643 cells that makes them more sensitive to A12 treatment.

Our observed inhibitory effects of A12 concur with those reported by others who used small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors of IGF-IR (NVP-AEW541 and NVP-ADW742) that sensitized multiple myeloma and lung cancer cells to chemotherapy drugs, such as doxorubicin and etoposide (28, 29). However, unlike the small-molecule IGF-IR kinase inhibitors studied previously, A12 does not seem to significantly increase ATC cell apoptosis in culture. Our cell cycle analyses showed that ATC cells treated with A12 accumulate in the G0-G1 stage (data not shown), suggesting that, as a mAb, A12 causes decreased cell growth predominantly through a cytostatic effect. Similar results have been found in other studies of IGF-IR antibodies (EM164, h7C10, CP-751, and CP-871; refs. 30, 34, 36).

The principal IGF-IR signaling pathway is through the IGF-IR/IRS-I axis. Both IGF-I and IGF-II can bind to IGF-IR and induce ligand-dependent receptor autophosphorylation. The IGF-IRß then phosphorylates a series of adaptor proteins, including IRS-I, to activate intracellular signaling cascades, including the Akt and MAPK pathways. In our experiments, A12 was found to down-regulate the phosphorylation of IGF-IRß, IRS-I, Akt, and MAPK induced by both IGF-I and IGF-II. The downstream signal inhibition was more extensive in cells stimulated by IGF-I than by IGF-II. This may be attributed to the fact that IGF-II follows a slower binding kinetics to IGF-IR than IGF-I (38). Additionally, IGF-II can signal not only through the IGF-IR but also through insulin and mannose-6-phosphate receptors. A12, on the other hand, is very specific to IGF-IR and has no antagonistic activity against the IR or mannose-6-phosphate receptor. Our results agree with earlier reports where it has been shown that A12 has lower blocking activity for IGF-I with an IC50 equal to 1 nmol/L but significantly higher for IGF-II with an IC50 equal to 6 nmol/L (27).

To precisely determine the effect of A12 on tumor growth in vivo, we used an orthotopic model to study thyroid cancer in nude mice (37, 39). A12 significantly inhibited the growth of ARO mouse tumors with few toxic effects. Treatment with A12 alone produced ~50% reduction in tumor volume. In tumor sections, immunohistochemical analyses revealed a decrease in pIGF-IRß, pAkt, and PCNA staining and an increase in apoptosis. However, in the survival study, the survival rate of the group treated with A12 alone was not better than that of the placebo-treated group. This was an unexpected outcome, considering the fact that A12 effectively reduced tumor volumes by 57%. It is conceivable that in an advanced tumor type, such as ATC, the cells have multiple growth receptor pathways or downstream growth-regulatory molecules up-regulated so that interference with a single receptor at the cell membrane does not significantly alter the balance of growth-stimulatory and growth-inhibitory signals to the cytoplasm and nucleus.

However, the most significant tumor growth suppression and longest survival improvement were achieved with the combination of A12 and irinotecan. Therefore, we propose that IGF-IR-targeted therapy should be given in combination with other therapeutic strategies to achieve its maximum antitumor effects (25, 28). Thus, it may provide a further beneficial effects, such as preventing resistance to drugs (e.g., trastuzumab; ref. 40). Another potential benefit of its use as an adjuvant therapy was revealed when immunostaining quantification analyses showed that A12 enhanced the cytotoxic effect of irinotecan by decreasing PCNA staining and inducing the apoptosis of tumor cells. It is likely that part of the antitumor efficacy of A12 may also be due to its ability to induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity as has been reported for some other therapeutic mAb agents (41). However, this possibility was not specifically explored in this study.

Recent studies have shown that the IGF-IR is abundantly expressed in endothelial cells (42). IGFs have been found to promote the growth, survival, and migration of tumor cells and to induce the syntheses of vascular endothelial growth factors A and C and matrix metalloproteinase-2, which may favor the development of the blood supply essential for the progressive growth of primary malignancies and the development of metastases (4348). Indeed, in our in vivo study, we found a decrease in microvessel density in the tumors from mice treated with A12 alone or in combination with irinotecan. Although previous studies from our laboratory have shown the antiangiogenic activity of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor (49), we did not detect apoptotic tumor endothelial cells in this study. However, a double-labeled immunohistochemical analysis showed that the phosphorylation of IGF-IR was decreased on tumor-associated endothelium in A12-treated tumors compared with controls, suggesting that IGF-IR signaling may play a role in endothelial cell survival in ATC tumors.

There is certainly precedence for the role of IGF-IR in endothelial cell survival in Ewing's sarcoma where it has been shown that IGF-IR receptor directly affects the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor-A, and there is a strict correlation between the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor-A and human umbilical vascular endothelial cell proliferation and survival (50). It is therefore possible that the antiangiogenic response induced by A12 is the result of reduced levels of proangiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor-A, in the tumor endothelium. Further studies have been initiated to test this hypothesis. Similarly, additional studies have been undertaken to determine how and when A12 becomes an effective antiangiogenic agent and if shorter exposures would also elicit a similar response.

In summary, we have shown that a novel IGF-IR antibody, A12, can significantly inhibit the proliferation of ATC cells by down-regulating the IGF-IR signaling pathway in vitro. Treatment with A12 alone or in combination with irinotecan reduced tumor volume and prolonged survival times in an orthotopic ATC nude mouse model by enhancing the cytotoxic effect of irinotecan and inducing antiangiogenesis. These findings suggest that blocking the IGF-IR with A12 seems to be a potential avenue for treating patients with ATC by its direct antitumor effects and its effects on the tumor vasculature.


    Footnotes
 
Grant support: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Specialized Program of Research Excellence in Head and Neck Cancer grant P50 CA097007, NIH Cancer Center support grant CA016672, and PANTHEON Program.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

4 Personal communication (AACR Abstract 2004; Ludwig et al.). Back

Received 12/ 8/05; revised 5/ 9/06; accepted 5/17/06.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:10–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sherman SI. Thyroid carcinoma. Lancet 2003;361:501–11.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Kebebew E, Greenspan FS, Clark OH, Woeber KA, McMillan A. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Treatment outcome and prognostic factors. Cancer 2005;103:1330–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Pasieka JL. Anaplastic thyroid cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2003;15:78–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Ullrich A, Gray A, Tam AW, et al. Insulin-like growth factor I receptor primary structure: comparison with insulin receptor suggests structural determinants that define functional specificity. EMBO J 1986;5:2503–12.[Medline]
  6. Jones JI, Clemmons DR. Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions. Endocr Rev 1995;16:3–34.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. LeRoith D, Roberts CT, Jr. The insulin-like growth factor system and cancer. Cancer Lett 2003;195:127–37.[Medline]
  8. Surmacz E. Growth factor receptors as therapeutic targets: strategies to inhibit the insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Oncogene 2003;22:6589–97.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Belfiore A, Pandini G, Vella V, Squatrito S, Vigneri R. Insulin/IGF-I hybrid receptors play a major role in IGF-I signaling in thyroid cancer. Biochimie 1999;81:403–7.[Medline]
  10. Vella V, Sciacca L, Pandini G, et al. The IGF system in thyroid cancer: new concepts. Mol Pathol 2001;54:121–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Baserga R, Morrione A. Differentiation and malignant transformation: two roads diverged in a wood. J Cell Biochem 1999 Suppl;32–33:68–75.[CrossRef]
  12. Baserga R, Peruzzi F, Reiss K. The IGF-1 receptor in cancer biology. Int J Cancer 2003;107:873–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Baserga R. Targeting the IGF-1 receptor: from rags to riches. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:2013–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Valentinis B, Baserga R. IGF-I receptor signalling in transformation and differentiation. Mol Pathol 2001;54:133–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Foulstone E, Prince S, Zaccheo O, et al. Insulin-like growth factor ligands, receptors, and binding proteins in cancer. J Pathol 2005;205:145–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Renehan AG, Zwahlen M, Minder C, O'Dwyer ST, Shalet SM, Egger M. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3, and cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet 2004;363:1346–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Cullen KJ, Yee D, Sly WS, et al. Insulin-like growth factor receptor expression and function in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 1990;50:48–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wu Y, Yakar S, Zhao L, Hennighausen L, LeRoith D. Circulating insulin-like growth factor-I levels regulate colon cancer growth and metastasis. Cancer Res 2002;62:1030–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. D'Ambrosio C, Ferber A, Resnicoff M, Baserga R. A soluble insulin-like growth factor I receptor that induces apoptosis of tumor cells in vivo and inhibits tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 1996;56:4013–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Pollak M. Insulin-like growth factor physiology and cancer risk. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:1224–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. DiGiovanni J, Bol DK, Wilker E, et al. Constitutive expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 in epidermal basal cells of transgenic mice leads to spontaneous tumor promotion. Cancer Res 2000;60:1561–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Khandwala HM, McCutcheon IE, Flyvbjerg A, Friend KE. The effects of insulin-like growth factors on tumorigenesis and neoplastic growth. Endocr Rev 2000;21:215–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Delafontaine P, Song YH, Li Y. Expression, regulation, and function of IGF-1, IGF-1R, and IGF-1 binding proteins in blood vessels. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24:435–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Grimberg A, Cohen P. Role of insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in growth control and carcinogenesis. J Cell Physiol 2000;183:1–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Baxter RC. Signalling pathways involved in antiproliferative effects of IGFBP-3: a review. Mol Pathol 2001;54:145–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Zhang H, Yee D. The therapeutic potential of agents targeting the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2004;13:1569–77.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Burtrum D, Zhu Z, Lu D, et al. A fully human monoclonal antibody to the insulin-like growth factor I receptor blocks ligand-dependent signaling and inhibits human tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Res 2003;63:8912–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Mitsiades CS, Mitsiades NS, McMullan CJ, et al. Inhibition of the insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 tyrosine kinase activity as a therapeutic strategy for multiple myeloma, other hematologic malignancies, and solid tumors. Cancer Cell 2004;5:221–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Warshamana-Greene GS, Litz J, Buchdunger E, Garcia-Echeverria C, Hofmann F, Krystal GW. The insulin-like growth factor-I receptor kinase inhibitor, NVP-ADW742, sensitizes small cell lung cancer cell lines to the effects of chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:1563–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Maloney EK, McLaughlin JL, Dagdigian NE, et al. An anti-insulin-like growth factor I receptor antibody that is a potent inhibitor of cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Res 2003;63:5073–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Garcia-Echeverria C, Pearson MA, Marti A, et al. In vivo antitumor activity of NVP-AEW541-A novel, potent, and selective inhibitor of the IGF-IR kinase. Cancer Cell 2004;5:231–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Scotlandi K, Manara MC, Nicoletti G, et al. Antitumor activity of the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor kinase inhibitor NVP-AEW541 in musculoskeletal tumors. Cancer Res 2005;65:3868–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Benini S, Manara MC, Baldini N, et al. Inhibition of insulin-like growth factor I receptor increases the antitumor activity of doxorubicin and vincristine against Ewing's sarcoma cells. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:1790–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Cohen BD, Baker DA, Soderstrom C, et al. Combination therapy enhances the inhibition of tumor growth with the fully human anti-type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody CP-751,871. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:2063–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Girnita A, Girnita L, del Prete F, Bartolazzi A, Larsson O, Axelson M. Cyclolignans as inhibitors of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and malignant cell growth. Cancer Res 2004;64:236–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Goetsch L, Gonzalez A, Leger O, et al. A recombinant humanized anti-insulin-like growth factor receptor type I antibody (h7C10) enhances the antitumor activity of vinorelbine and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy against human cancer xenografts. Int J Cancer 2005;113:316–28.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Kim S, Park YW, Schiff BA, et al. An orthotopic model of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in athymic nude mice. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:1713–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Jansson M, Hallen D, Koho H, et al. Characterization of ligand binding of a soluble human insulin-like growth factor I receptor variant suggests a ligand-induced conformational change. J Biol Chem 1997;272:8189–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Fidler IJ, Wilmanns C, Staroselsky A, Radinsky R, Dong Z, Fan D. Modulation of tumor cell response to chemotherapy by the organ environment. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1994;13:209–22.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Lu Y, Zi X, Zhao Y, Mascarenhas D, Pollak M. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling and resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin). J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1852–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Wang Y, Hailey J, Williams D, et al. Inhibition of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) signaling and tumor cell growth by a fully human neutralizing anti-IGF-IR antibody. Mol Cancer Ther 2005;4:1214–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Chisalita SI, Arnqvist HJ. Insulin-like growth factor I receptors are more abundant than insulin receptors in human micro- and macrovascular endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2004;286:E896–901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Poulaki V, Mitsiades CS, McMullan C, et al. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by insulin-like growth factor I in thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:5392–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Folkman J. Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nat Med 1995;1:27–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Adesanya OO, Zhou J, Samathanam C, Powell-Braxton L, Bondy CA. Insulin-like growth factor 1 is required for G2 progression in the estradiol-induced mitotic cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:3287–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Tang Y, Zhang D, Fallavollita L, Brodt P. Vascular endothelial growth factor C expression and lymph node metastasis are regulated by the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor. Cancer Res 2003;63:1166–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Folkman J. Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1757–63.[Free Full Text]
  48. Zhang D, Bar-Eli M, Meloche S, Brodt P. Dual regulation of MMP-2 expression by the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor: the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and Raf/ERK pathways transmit opposing signals. J Biol Chem 2004;279:19683–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Yigitbasi OG, Younes MN, Doan D, et al. Tumor cell and endothelial cell therapy of oral cancer by dual tyrosine kinase receptor blockade. Cancer Res 2004;64:7977–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Strammiello R, Benini S, Manara MC, et al. Impact of IGF-I/IGF-IR circuit on the angiogenetic properties of Ewing's sarcoma cells. Horm Metab Res 2003;35:675–84.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. K. Rowinsky, H. Youssoufian, J. R. Tonra, P. Solomon, D. Burtrum, and D. L. Ludwig
IMC-A12, a Human IgG1 Monoclonal Antibody to the Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Receptor
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5549s - 5555s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Myers, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Myers, J. N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online