Clinical Cancer Research CR Helping Patients Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badoual, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tartour, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Badoual, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tartour, E.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 12, 465-472, January 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research


Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Prognostic Value of Tumor-Infiltrating CD4+ T-Cell Subpopulations in Head and Neck Cancers

Cécile Badoual1,3, Stéphane Hans4, José Rodriguez6, Severine Peyrard8, Christophe Klein2, Nour El Houda Agueznay1, Véronique Mosseri7, Ollivier Laccourreye4, Patrick Bruneval3, Wolf H. Fridman1,5, Daniel F. Brasnu4 and Eric Tartour1,5

Authors' Affiliations: 1 Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale U255 and 2 Plateau technique d'imagerie cellulaire, IFR58, Institut Biomedical des Cordeliers, Université Paris 5; 3 Unité d'Anatomie Pathologique, 4 Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and 5 Unité d'Immunologie Biologique, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou; 6 Departments of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and 7 Biostatistics, Institut Curie; and 8 Centre d'Investigations Cliniques 9201, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Requests for reprints: Eric Tartour, Unité d'Immunologie Biologique, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 Rue Leblanc, 75908 Paris Cedex 15, France. Phone: 33-1-56-09-39-42; Fax: 33-1-56-09-20-80; E-mail: eric.tartour{at}hop.egp.ap-hop-paris.fr.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: CD4+ T cells play a central role in initiating and maintaining anticancer immune responses. However, regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells which express Foxp3 have also been shown to inhibit antitumor effector T cells. In view of these heterogeneous CD4+ T-cell populations, this study was designed to determine the prognostic value of various tumor-infiltrating CD4+ T-cell populations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Experimental Design: Eighty-four newly diagnosed untreated patients with histologically proven primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were included in this study. Double or triple immunofluorescence staining was done to assess and quantify the activated CD4+CD69+ T cells, regulatory CD4+Foxp3+ T cells, and mixed CD4+CD25+ T cells comprising both activated and regulatory T cells.

Results: On univariate analysis, high levels of tumor-infiltrating CD4+CD69+ T cells were correlated with both better locoregional control (P = 0.01) and longer survival (P = 0.01). Infiltration by regulatory Foxp3+CD4+ T cells was positively associated with a better locoregional control of the tumor. Multivariate analysis showed that the only significant prognostic factors related to locoregional control were T stage (P = 0.02) and CD4+Foxp3+ T-cell infiltration of the tumor (P = 0.02). In the Cox multivariate analysis, only two variables influenced overall survival probability: T stage (P = 0.036) and CD4+CD69+ T-cell infiltration (P = 0.017).

Conclusion: This study shows that tumor-infiltrating activated CD4+CD69+ T cells are associated with a good prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. In addition, regulatory Foxp3+CD4+ T cells are positively correlated with locoregional control may be through down-regulation of harmful inflammatory reaction, which could favor tumor progression.


Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma have benefited from recent advances in radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgical techniques. However, despite new treatment modalities and their success in terms of organ preservation and overall quality of life, survival rates for this disease have not improved over recent years (1).

Extensive analysis of the phenotype of tumor cells by genetic and molecular approaches, designed to provide a better understanding of the biology of this aggressive tumor, has led to the identification of abnormalities that are often present during progression of head and neck cancer (loss of chromosomal region 9p21 associated with the P16 tumor suppressor gene, high levels of P53 mutations, overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and cyclin D1, etc.; ref. 2). Antibodies or inhibitors directed against some of these amplified molecules are currently under clinical investigation (3, 4).

Head and neck tissues with a normal or benign appearance (i.e., minimal dysplasia) already contain clonal genetic changes such as mutations, potential targets of a possible early immune response limiting the extent of the disease, as reported in other preneoplastic lesions (5).

Few studies have examined the role of host immune responses in the course of head and neck cancers, although various arguments suggest that T lymphocytes may play a role in the control of the development of this cancer. Head and neck cancer–associated tumor antigens have been identified and are recognized by specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes (68). In patients with head and neck cancers, antitumor functions of T lymphocytes are often compromised (9) but the presence of functional T cells, as measured by expression of the CD3 {zeta}-chain or a good proliferative response of lymphocytes to CD3 antibodies, has been found to be associated with better survival and prognosis (10, 11).

Among lymphocytes, most studies have focused on analysis of CD8+ T cells which have been shown to be potent mediators of antitumor immunity (12). The role of CD4+ T cells is more controversial and is often considered to be a double-edged immunologic sword as CD4+ T cells play a central role in initiating and maintaining anticancer immune responses (1315). In the absence of CD4+ T-cell help, specific CD8+ T cells can become lethargic (16) or be deleted (17). CD4+ T-cell help is needed during the primary antigen-specific response to imprint CD8+ T cells with the ability to develop into long-lived functional memory cells (18). In antitumor immunity, CD4+ T cells have also been shown to be important in sustaining the functions of adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells (19). Lastly, CD4+ T cells could inhibit tumor growth in the absence of CD8+ T cells by directly lysing MHC class II–positive tumor cells (20) or by promoting the recruitment of other effector cells, such as macrophages and eosinophils (21). On the other hand, a naturally occurring CD4+ T-cell subset, regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells, has emerged as the dominant T-cell population governing peripheral self-tolerance by inhibiting effector T cells (22, 23). Because the CD3+CD4+CD25+ phenotype also identifies activated T cells, new markers such as Foxp3 have been described which seem to discriminate activated and regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells (24, 25). In animal models, removal of CD4+CD25+ T cells improved immune-mediated tumor clearance and enhanced the response to immunotherapy (2628). As observed in other cancers (29, 30), the frequency of regulatory CD4+CD25+ T-cell was significantly elevated in the peripheral blood of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared with healthy donors (31). An enrichment of CD4+CD25+ T cells among tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes derived from head and neck cancer has already been reported (31).

In view of these heterogeneous CD4+ T-cell populations, this study was designed to determine the significance and prognostic value of various populations of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ T cells in head and neck cancers.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients. Eighty-four newly diagnosed untreated patients with histologically proven primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were included in this prospective study. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient characteristics

 
Each patient's disease was staged according to the fifth edition of the Unio Internationale Contra Cancrum/American Joint Committee on Cancer system for head and neck cancer (32).

Treatment modalities consisted of surgery, alone or combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Fifty-eight patients received induction chemotherapy before surgery and were staged clinically.

This study was conducted in accordance with French laws and after approval by local ethics committee.

Immunofluorescence staining. Tissue samples obtained before any treatment at initial endoscopy or surgery were immediately frozen and stored at –80°C. Frozen specimens were sectioned at 4 to 6 µm with a cryostat, placed on slides, air dried, and fixed for 10 minutes with 100% acetone.

Before incubation with primary antibodies, the slides were treated with avidin/biotin blocker (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and Fc receptor was blocked with human serum (5%).

The antibodies used for the various double or triple immunofluorescence stainings are described in Supplementary Table S1.

The various antibodies were diluted in PBS. Isotype-matched antibodies were used as negative controls. In each case, we checked that the secondary antibodies did not cross-react with the isotype or species of the other primary antibody immunoglobulin in the double or triple immunofluorescence technique.

Fluorescent images of mounted sections were analyzed with an epifluorescent microscope (DMR, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).

A quantitative grading system was used to quantify the tumor-infiltrating CD4+ T-cell subpopulations. The mean of positive stained cells in at least five fields using a 40x objective was selected for each analysis.

High and low levels of CD4+ T-cell subpopulations were defined using the median of tumor infiltration for these cells as cutoff value.

Two authors (C.B. and E.T.), blinded for clinical data, independently scored the slides.

Confocal analysis. Triple immunofluorescence staining was analyzed with a confocal laser scanning microscope Zeiss LSM 510 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). All images were acquired with a Zeiss Plan-Neofluar 40x objective with a x8 electronic zoom.

Optical slice thickness was adjusted to 2 µm for all channels. Multichannel images were recorded by sequential excitation to avoid cross-talk. For triple labeling, excitation was 488 nm and emission was 505 to 530 nm for FITC; excitation was 543 nm and emission was 560 to 615 nm for Cy3; and excitation was 633 nm and emission was >650 nm for Cy5.

Statistical analysis. The relationship between the different CD4+ T-cell subpopulations was analyzed by the {chi}2 test or the Fisher's exact test as necessary.

Survival variables were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model determined the influence of each variable, when adjusted to others, on locoregional control (relapse-free survival) and overall survival. The level of significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Overall survival was defined as the time from initial diagnosis until death or until last follow-up (right censored data).

Overall survival took all deaths into account. At the time of data analysis, 32 patients had died and 93.7% of deaths seemed to be directly related to the original primary cancer (locoregional failure or metastatic disease).

Locoregional control was calculated from the end of treatment and was defined as the absence of disease or either persistent or recurrent disease at the primary site or in the cervical lymph nodes. Patients with persistent disease at the end of treatment were considered to have experienced failure at time zero. Patients with no signs of relapse were censored at the time of last follow-up or death. The median follow-up for the whole population was 18 months.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Head and neck tumors are infiltrated by activated and regulatory CD4+ T cells. In the first analysis, we showed that head and neck cancers were infiltrated by CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1). Large numbers of CD4+ T cells (>10 CD4+ T cells per field) were observed in 51 of 84 tumors. CD4+ T cells were predominantly found in the stroma of tumors (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Immunocytochemistry analysis of CD4+ T-cell subpopulations in head and neck cancers. Tissues were stained with antibodies to human CD3, CD4, CD25, Foxp3, and CD69. Left and middle, results of simple immunofluorescence acquisition with each antibody. Right, double immunofluorescence staining. Yellow, colocalization between the two markers recognized by the specific antibodies (original magnification, x 400).

 
To more accurately define the phenotype of these tumor-infiltrating CD4+ T cells, we then characterized various CD4+ T-cell subpopulations focusing on activated and regulatory CD4+ T cells.

CD4+CD25+ T cells, including both activated and regulatory CD4+ T cells, were present in variable numbers mainly in peritumoral area (Fig. 1). Double immunofluorescence staining revealed that most CD25+ cells corresponded to cells that were also recognized by anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (Fig. 1 and data not shown).

The median level of CD4+CD25+ T-cell infiltration was 3.7 (range, 0-16) in the whole population (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Univariate analysis of the relationships between the levels of the various CD4+ T-cell subpopulations infiltrating tumors and locoregional control and survival for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

 
Because CD25 antigen expression in T cells cannot allow precise discrimination between activated and regulatory T cells, we specifically measured the infiltration of regulatory and activated CD4+ T cells using the Foxp3 and CD69 markers, respectively.

The number of CD4+Foxp3+ and CD4+CD69+ T cells was lower than that observed for CD4+CD25+ T cells. The distribution of CD4+Foxp3+ and CD4+CD69+ T cells ranged from 0 to 15 cells per field (median, 1.5) and from 0 to 11 cells per field (median, 2.6) in the whole population, respectively (Table 2).

As expected, Foxp3 immunostaining was mainly located in the nucleus (Fig. 1). Infiltrating CD4+CD69+ T cells and CD4+Foxp3+ T cells were detected in the peritumoral area (Fig. 1). Most CD69+ T cells colocalized with CD4+ and CD3+ T cells (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD69+ cells correspond to CD3+ T cells. Top, tissues were stained with antibodies to human CD3, CD25, and CD69 as depicted in Fig. 1. Some CD3CD25+ and CD3CD69+ cells were observed in some cases. Bottom, triple immunofluorescence staining with confocal examination illustrates the fact that all CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD69+ cells were also stained by anti-CD3 antibodies. Bar, 6 µm (original magnification, top, x 400; bottom, 6-µM bar).

 
As CD4 antigen can be expressed by cells of the myeloid lineage, such as monocytes and dendritic cells (33), we excluded a possible bias in the interpretation of the above results by doing triple immunofluorescence staining with confocal analysis. We selected the tissue samples in which CD25+ or CD69+CD3 T cells were observed; those samples corresponded to 10% of all the tumors analyzed (Fig. 2 and data not shown). All CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD69+ cells were also positive for CD3 (Fig. 2 and data not shown). In all of these cases, CD4+CD3 cells never expressed CD25 or CD69 (Fig. 2). Triple immunofluorescence labeling with anti-Foxp3 was not done because it had already been shown that non-T cells do not express this molecule (22). These experiments support the assertion that in this study, CD4+Foxp3+, CD4+CD25+, and CD4+CD69+ cells really correspond to T cells.

Relationship between tumor infiltration by CD4+ T-cell subpopulations and clinical variables. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the levels of CD4+CD25+ T-cell infiltration and the number of CD4+CD69+ T cells present in the tumors (see Supplementary Table S2; P < 0.001). When the median value was used as a cutoff to define low and high levels CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD69+ T infiltration, a matching between these two variables was observed in 72.5% of cases (see Supplementary Table S2). This concordance drops to 60% and 58% for the relationship between CD4+CD25+ and CD4+Foxp3+ T-cell infiltration or CD4+CD69+ and CD4+Foxp3+ T-cell infiltration, respectively (see Supplementary Table S2 and data not shown).

For some patients, double immunostaining for CD69 and Foxp3 was done. We did not find colocalization between these two markers (data not shown).

We did not find any correlation between the levels of CD4+ T cells detected in the tumors and various clinical variables including primary tumor site, T stage, lymph node involvement, presence of metastases, and response to chemotherapy (data not shown).

Value of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ T-cell subpopulations in head and neck cancer to predict locoregional control and survival. On univariate analysis, tumor-infiltrating CD4+CD69+ T cells were the only CD4+ T-cell subpopulation positively correlated with both better locoregional control (P = 0.01) and longer survival (P = 0.01) when considered as a continuous variable (Table 2; Fig. 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relationship between the number of CD4+ T-cell subpopulation and locoregional control or survival in head and neck cancer patients. Continuous thick line, relationship between the number of infiltrating CD4+CD69+ T cells (A and B) or CD4+Foxp3+ T cells (C) and survival (A) or locoregional control (B and C) at 24-month follow-up for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Dashed line, the upper or lower 95% CI.

 
Survival at 24 months of patients with no CD4+CD69+ T-cell infiltrate at the time of diagnosis was 42% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 25-68] versus 89% (95% CI, 77-100) in patients with the highest levels of tumor-infiltrating CD4+CD69+ T cells (P = 0.01; Fig. 3).

When the number of CD4+CD69+ corresponding to the median (2.6) was used as the cutoff to define low-level and high-level CD4+CD69+ T-cell infiltration, overall survival at 24 months was 54% in the low-level group versus 70% in the high-level group (P = 0.04; see Supplementary Fig. S1).

The estimated 2-year locoregional control rate was 39% in the group with low-level CD4+CD69+ T-cell infiltration compared with 70% in the group with high-level CD4+CD69+ T-cell infiltration (P = 0.002).

When considered as a continuous variable, CD4+Foxp3+ T-cell infiltration was positively correlated with better locoregional control (P = 0.026) but did not influence overall survival (P = 0.07; Table 2).

Locoregional control in patients with the lowest or highest CD4+Foxp3+ T-cell infiltration was 31% (95% CI, 17-57) and 99% (95% CI, 98-100), respectively (Fig. 3).

When the number of CD4+Foxp3+ T cells corresponding to the median (1.5) was used as the cutoff to define low-level and high-level CD4+Foxp3+ T-cell infiltration, a better locoregional control was also observed in the high-level group compared with the low-level group (P = 0.02; see Supplementary Fig. S1).

Although not statistically significant, a trend towards longer survival (P = 0.059) and better locoregional control (P = 0.054) was observed in the group of patients with a high level of tumor-infiltrating CD4+CD25+ T cells at diagnosis (Table 2).

Because of the high number of cells, it was difficult to accurately quantify the CD3+CD4+ T-cell infiltration as a continuous variable. However, when we arbitrarily used a cutoff value of 10 cells per field to discriminate low-level and high-level CD3+CD4+ cell infiltration, low levels of CD3+CD4+ T cells were associated with absence of locoregional control (P = 0.02) but did not influence overall survival (P = 0.2).

As expected, T stage and presence of metastases were predictive factors of both locoregional control and overall survival (data not shown). Lymph node infiltration was not associated with clinical prognosis probably because most patients were initially treated by chemotherapy, excluding accurate histologic staging of lymph node involvement at diagnosis.

Because most immunocytochemistry studies assessing tumor-infiltrating immune cells pointed to CD8 antigen detection as a predictor of clinical outcome (34, 35), we also included this variable in this analysis. The levels of CD8+ T-cell infiltrates in the stroma were not predictive of locoregional control (P = 0.89) or overall survival (P = 0.59).

Similar results were obtained when intratumoral instead of peritumoral CD8+ T-cell infiltrates were considered (data not shown).

Multivariate analysis showed that the only significant prognostic factors related to locoregional control were T stage (P = 0.02; relative risk, 2.79) and CD4+Foxp3+ T-cell infiltration of the tumor (P = 0.02; relative risk, 0.69; Table 3). In the Cox multivariate analysis, only two variables influenced overall survival probability: T stage (P = 0.036; relative risk, 2.53) and levels of CD4+CD69+ T-cell infiltration (P = 0.031; relative risk, 0.79; Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Factors influencing locoregional control and survival as determined by the Cox proportional hazards models in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients

 
Differences in treatment modalities were included in this model and did not change the significance of these variables.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we show that high levels of tumor-infiltrating CD4+CD69+ T cells are significantly associated with better survival and locoregional control in head and neck cancer patients. The prognostic value of CD4+CD69+ T cells on survival remained significant when multivariate analysis adjusted on clinical variables was done.

To our knowledge, this is the first report showing a prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating activated CD4+ T cells in human tumors. In some other studies, expression of activated markers by peritumoral lymphocytes was also correlated with longer survival (36). CD69 is expressed on recently activated T cells and may represent a surrogate marker of an ongoing immune response (37).

Activated CD4+ T cells could inhibit tumor growth by lysing tumors cells or by secreting cytokines (IFN{gamma}, tumor necrosis factor {alpha}, etc.) with antitumor activity (21, 38). They also play a major cooperative role for CD8+ T cells in in vivo tumor eradication and promote recruitment of other antitumor effector cells, such as macrophages and eosinophils (21).

The clinical significance of CD4+ T cells inside tumors is controversial in the literature. A large number of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ T cells were found to be an independent favorable prognostic factor in pancreatic adenocarcinomas and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (39, 40). Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with active disease had significantly lower CD4+ T-cell counts than those with no evidence of disease (41). Intratumoral T cells composed of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, of which infiltration was highly correlated, were associated with improved clinical outcome in advanced ovarian carcinoma (42). On the contrary, other groups have reported that an increased level of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ T cells is associated with poor outcome in renal cell carcinoma (35, 43).

The heterogeneity of the phenotype of CD4+ T cells may explain these contradictory results. For example, CD4+ T-cell subpopulations included T-helper 2 cells producing type 2 cytokines (interleukin 4, interleukin 5, interleukin 13, etc.), which inhibit the T-helper 1 cell–mediated immune response and could also influence tumor-host behavior (44).

CD4+ T cells are also divided into helper effector T cells and regulatory T cells. A population of regulatory CD4+ T cells, such as activated T cells, express CD25 but also the transcription factor Foxp3, which has been shown to be specific for regulatory CD25+CD4+ T cells in mice and humans (22, 45). Experimental depletion of regulatory CD25+CD4+ T cells in mice improved immune-mediated tumor clearance and enhanced the response to immune-based therapy (2628).

In humans, regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells have been reported to be increased in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and in the peripheral circulation of patients with various malignancies (2931).

In our study, the level of tumor-infiltrating CD4+Foxp3+ T cells was positively correlated with a better locoregional control in both univariate and multivariate analysis. This finding contrasts with recent results reported by Curiel's group indicating a significant correlation between tumor CD4+ T regulatory cell content defined by the expression of CD25 and Foxp3 and survival in patients with ovarian carcinomas but the influence of CD4+Foxp3+ on disease-free survival was not determined (46). In line with our results, a large number of Foxp3 positive cells were also considered to be a significant predictor of longer event-free survival and disease-free survival in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (47). Various factors can explain the different effect of the presence of CD4+ T regulatory cells in the clinical course of the disease. The role of regulatory T cells may differ according to the clinical stage of the tumor. Various authors have reported that the frequency of regulatory CD4+ T cells increased during tumor progression (46, 48) and their in vivo depletion is efficient to eradicate established tumor only when it is not done during the priming phase of the antitumor immune response (48).

In contrast, it has recently been shown that adoptive transfer of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T lymphocytes in mice suppressed colitis-associated colon cancer and development of spontaneous intestinal adenomas (49, 50). Treatment with regulatory T cells also induced down-regulation of Cox-2 and proinflammatory cytokines known to promote malignancy (5052).

The functionality of regulatory T cells was not monitored because most patients in this study received induction chemotherapy before surgery and we had to use tissue samples from initial endoscopy and not surgery to avoid bias in interpreting the results. This biopsy material was too limited to isolate and do functional assays on the different subpopulations of CD4+ T cells combined with routine analysis and immunofluorescence studies.

One possible interpretation bias in the present study could be that CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD69+ cells did not only represent T cells but also included cells from the monocyte-dendritic lineage as these cells could also express CD4. Triple immunofluorescence staining and confocal analysis confirmed that all CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD69+ cells detected actually corresponded to T cells. Only low levels of CD4 are observed in tissue macrophages and are difficult to detect and lower than the levels observed in peripheral monocytes or helper CD4+ T cells (53). It has also been shown that activation of monocyte-macrophages by proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor {alpha} and IL-1, cytokines highly expressed on head and neck tumors (54), which could up-regulate CD25 or CD69 on these cells, also down-regulated total CD4 expression on monocyte-macrophages at the level of transcription (55). As regards a possible interference with CD4+ dendritic cells, it is known that some immature dendritic cells express CD4 and induction of CD25 and CD69 has been reported when they differentiate into a mature state (56). However, one of the many changes observed during the dendritic cell maturation process is a decrease in CD4 expression (56, 57).

All these data support the assumption in this study that tumor-infiltrating CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD69+ can be considered to be T cells.

We did not use confocal analysis to count tumor-infiltrating CD4+ T cells as the rapid fading and the time required for image acquisition with this microscope were not compatible with the analysis of multiple variables in a large series of patients.

CD4+CD25+ T cells are the prominent subpopulation of CD4+ T cells infiltrating head and neck tumors. The relationships between tumor infiltration by these cells and the plasma concentration of the soluble {alpha} chains of interleukin-2 receptors, previously reported as a prognostic marker in head and neck cancer (58), are currently being analyzed.9

Most immunocytochemical analyses assessing immune cell infiltration in cancer patients have emphasized the value of CD8+ T cells to predict clinical recurrence and probability of survival (59, 60). In this study, we did not find any prognostic value associated with the presence of CD8+ T cells measured either in the tumor stroma or within tumor cells. This result could be related to the fact that CD8+ T lymphocytes, and not CD4+ T cells, seem to be particularly sensitive to apoptosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (61).

In light of these results, depletion of CD25+ T cells, sometimes incorrectly considered to be mainly composed of regulatory T cells, may be harmful in head and neck cancer as these cells also include activated CD4+ T cells, the presence of which is associated with a good prognosis. In addition, even regulatory Foxp3+CD4+ T cells may be beneficial in some cancers by down-regulating an inflammatory reaction which could favor tumor progression (51, 52).


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Benoit Vingert for critical reading of the manuscript; M. Ménard, H.P. Dernis, E. De Mones, R. Kania, F. Lagarde, J.B. Lecanu, D. Malinvaud, and J.F. Papon for their clinical support; C. Bouillac, S. Maillard, D. Moissy, and N. Levin for their technical support; and all the subjects who participated in this study.


    Footnotes
 
Grant support: Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, Fondation de France, Cancéropole d'Ile de France, and Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

9 Badoual et al., Soluble IL-2 receptor and MMP-9 expression in head and neck cancer: prognostic value and analysis of their relationships, manuscript in preparation. Back

Received 8/29/05; revised 10/18/05; accepted 10/27/05.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Forastiere A, Koch W, Trotti A, Sidransky D. Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1890–900.[Free Full Text]
  2. Kim MM, Califano JA. Molecular pathology of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Cancer 2004;112:545–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Cohen EE, Lingen MW, Vokes EE. The expanding role of systemic therapy in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1743–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hoffmann TK, Bier H, Whiteside TL. Targeting the immune system: novel therapeutic approaches in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2004;53:1055–67.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Finn OJ. Premalignant lesions as targets for cancer vaccines. J Exp Med 2003;198:1623–6.[Free Full Text]
  6. Kass ES, Greiner JW, Kantor JA, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen as a target for specific antitumor immunotherapy of head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 2002;62:5049–57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Chikamatsu K, Albers A, Stanson J, et al. P53(110–124)-specific human CD4+ T-helper cells enhance in vitro generation and antitumor function of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells. Cancer Res 2003;63:3675–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kienstra MA, Neel HB, Strome SE, Roche P. Identification of NY-ESO-1, MAGE-1, and MAGE-3 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2003;25:457–63.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Reichert TE, Rabinowich H, Johnson JT, Whiteside TL. Mechanisms responsible for signaling and functional defects. J Immunother 1998;21:295–306.[Medline]
  10. Reichert TE, Scheuer C, Day R, Wagner W, Whiteside TL. The number of intratumoral dendritic cells and {zeta}-chain expression in T cells as prognostic and survival biomarkers in patients with oral carcinoma. Cancer 2001;91:2136–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Shibuya TY, Nugyen N, McLaren CE, et al. Clinical significance of poor CD3 response in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:745–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Benchetrit F, Gazagne A, Adotevi O, et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes: role in immunosurveillance and in immunotherapy. Bull Cancer 2003;90:1–9.
  13. Pardoll DM, Topalian SL. The role of CD4+ T cell responses in antitumor immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 1998;10:588–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Toes RE, Ossendorp F, Offringa R, Melief CJ. CD4 T cells and their role in antitumor immune responses. J Exp Med 1999;189:753–6.[Free Full Text]
  15. Ho WY, Yee C, Greenberg PD. Adoptive therapy with CD8(+) T cells: it may get by with a little help from its friends. J Clin Invest 2002;110:1415–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Bourgeois C, Veiga-Fernandes H, Joret AM, et al. CD8 lethargy in the absence of CD4 help. Eur J Immunol 2002;32:2199–207.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Kurts C, Carbone FR, Barnden M, et al. CD4+ T cell help impairs CD8+ T cell deletion induced by cross-presentation of self-antigens and favors autoimmunity. J Exp Med 1997;186:2057–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Bevan MJ. Helping the CD8(+) T-cell response. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4:595–602.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Robbins PF, et al. Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science 2002;19:850–4.
  20. Greenberg PD. Adoptive T cell therapy of tumors: mechanisms operative in the recognition and elimination of tumor cells. Adv Immunol 1991;49:281–355.[Medline]
  21. Qin Z, Blankenstein T. CD4+ T cell-mediated tumor rejection involves inhibition of angiogenesis that is dependent on IFN{gamma} receptor expression by nonhematopoietic cells. Immunity 2000;12:677–86.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Sakaguchi S. Naturally arising CD4+ regulatory t cells for immunologic self-tolerance and negative control of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol 2004;22:531–62.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Shevach EM. CD4+ CD25+ suppressor T cells: more questions than answers. Nat Rev Immunol 2002;2:389–400.[Medline]
  24. Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science 2003;299:1057–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol 2003;4:330–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Shimizu J, Yamazaki S, Sakaguchi S. Induction of tumor immunity by removing CD25+CD4+ T cells: a common basis between tumor immunity and autoimmunity. J Immunol 1999;163:5211–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sutmuller RP, van Duivenvoorde LM, van Elsas A, et al. Synergism of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade and depletion of CD25(+) regulatory T cells in antitumor therapy reveals alternative pathways for suppression of autoreactive cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. J Exp Med 2001;194:823–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ghiringhelli F, Larmonier N, Schmitt E, et al. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress tumor immunity but are sensitive to cyclophosphamide which allows immunotherapy of established tumors to be curative. Eur J Immunol 2004;34:336–44.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Liyanage UK, Moore TT, Joo HG, et al. Prevalence of regulatory T cells is increased in peripheral blood and tumor microenvironment of patients with pancreas or breast adenocarcinoma. J Immunol 2002;169:2756–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Wolf AM, Wolf D, Steurer M, et al. Increase of regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood of cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:606–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Schaefer C, Kim GG, Albers A, et al. Characteristics of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in the peripheral circulation of patients with head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer 2005;92:913–20.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.
  33. Kazazi F, Mathijs JM, Foley P, Cunningham AL. Variations in CD4 expression by human monocytes and macrophages and their relationships to infection with the human immunodeficiency virus. J Gen Virol 1989;70:2661–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kondratiev S, Sabo E, Yakirevich E, Lavie O, Resnick MB. Intratumoral CD8+ T lymphocytes as a prognostic factor of survival in endometrial carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:4450–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Nakano O, Sato M, Naito Y, et al. Proliferative activity of intratumoral CD8(+) T-lymphocytes as a prognostic factor in human renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic demonstration of antitumor immunity. Cancer Res 2001;61:5132–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ladanyi A, Somlai B, Gilde K, Fejos Z, Gaudi I, Timar J. T-cell activation marker expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as prognostic factor in cutaneous malignant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:521–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Testi R, D'Ambrosio D, De Maria R, Santoni A. The CD69 receptor: a multipurpose cell-surface trigger for hematopoietic cells. Immunol Today 1994;15:479–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Mumberg D, Monach PA, Wanderling S, et al. CD4(+) T cells eliminate MHC class II-negative cancer cells in vivo by indirect effects of IFN-{gamma}. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:8633–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Fukunaga A, Miyamoto M, Cho Y, et al. CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes together with CD4+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and dendritic cells improve the prognosis of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 2004;28:e26–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Cho Y, Miyamoto M, Kato K, et al. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells cooperate to improve prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 2003;63:1555–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Kuss I, Hathaway B, Ferris RL, Gooding W, Whiteside TL. Decreased absolute counts of T lymphocyte subsets and their relation to disease in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3755–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Zhang L, Conejo-Garcia JR, Katsaros D, et al. Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:203–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Bromwich EJ, McArdle PA, Canna K, et al. The relationship between T-lymphocyte infiltration, stage, tumour grade and survival in patients undergoing curative surgery for renal cell cancer. Br J Cancer 2003;89:1906–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Tatsumi T, Kierstead LS, Ranieri E, et al. Disease-associated bias in T helper type 1 (Th1)/Th2 CD4(+) T cell responses against MAGE-6 in HLA-DRB10401(+) patients with renal cell carcinoma or melanoma. J Exp Med 2002;196:619–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Walker MR, Kasprowicz DJ, Gersuk VH, et al. Induction of FoxP3 and acquisition of T regulatory activity by stimulated human CD4+CD25– T cells. J Clin Invest 2003;112:1437–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Curiel TJ, Coukos G, Zou L, et al. Specific recruitment of regulatory T cells in ovarian carcinoma fosters immune privilege and predicts reduced survival. Nat Med 2004;10:942–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Alvaro T, Lejeune M, Salvado MT, et al. Outcome in Hodgkin's lymphoma can be predicted from the presence of accompanying cytotoxic and regulatory T cells. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:1467–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Yu P, Lee Y, Liu W, et al. Intratumor depletion of CD4+ cells unmasks tumor immunogenicity leading to the rejection of late-stage tumors. J Exp Med 2005;201:779–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Erdman SE, Poutahidis T, Tomczak M, et al. CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T lymphocytes inhibit microbially induced colon cancer in Rag2-deficient mice. Am J Pathol 2003;162:691–702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Erdman SE, Sohn JJ, Rao VP, et al. CD4+CD25+ regulatory lymphocytes induce regression of intestinal tumors in ApcMin/+ mice. Cancer Res 2005;65:3998–4004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Balkwill F, Coussens LM. Cancer: an inflammatory link. Nature 2004;431:405–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Mantovani A. Cancer: inflammation by remote control. Nature 2005;435:752–3.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Tuttle DL, Harrison JK, Anders C, Sleasman JW, Goodenow MM. Expression of CCR5 increases during monocyte differentiation and directly mediates macrophage susceptibility to infection by human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 1998;72:4962–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Woods KV, El-Naggar A, Clayman GL, Grimm EA. Variable expression of cytokines in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines and consistent expression in surgical specimens. Cancer Res 1998;58:3132–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Herbein G, Doyle AG, Montaner LJ, Gordon S. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) down-regulates CD4 expression in primary human macrophages through induction of endogenous tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and IL-1ß. Clin Exp Immunol 1995;102:430–7.[Medline]
  56. O'Doherty U, Steinman RM, Peng M, et al. Dendritic cells freshly isolated from human blood express CD4 and mature into typical immunostimulatory dendritic cells after culture in monocyte-conditioned medium. J Exp Med 1993;178:1067–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Lee B, Sharron M, Montaner LJ, Weissman D, Doms RW. Quantification of CD4, CCR5, and CXCR4 levels on lymphocyte subsets, dendritic cells, and differentially conditioned monocyte-derived macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:5215–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Tartour E, Mosseri V, Jouffroy T, et al. Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor concentrations as an independent prognostic marker in head and neck cancer. Lancet 2001;357:1263–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Vermeer MH, van Doorn R, Dukers D, Bekkenk MW, Meijer CJ, Willemze R. CD8+ T cells in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: expression of cytotoxic proteins, Fas ligand, and killing inhibitory receptors and their relationship with clinical behavior. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:4322–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Naito Y, Saito K, Shiiba K, et al. CD8+ T cells infiltrated within cancer cell nests as a prognostic factor in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998;58:3491–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Hoffmann TK, Dworacki G, Tsukihiro T, et al. Spontaneous apoptosis of circulating T lymphocytes in patients with head and neck cancer and its clinical importance. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:2553–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Badoual, S. Hans, W. H. Fridman, D. Brasnu, S. Erdman, and E. Tartour
Revisiting the Prognostic Value of Regulatory T Cells in Patients With Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2009; 27(19): e5 - e6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. Salama, C. Platell, and B. Iacopetta
Reply to C. Badoual et al
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2009; 27(19): e7 - e7.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Gobert, I. Treilleux, N. Bendriss-Vermare, T. Bachelot, S. Goddard-Leon, V. Arfi, C. Biota, A. C. Doffin, I. Durand, D. Olive, et al.
Regulatory T Cells Recruited through CCL22/CCR4 Are Selectively Activated in Lymphoid Infiltrates Surrounding Primary Breast Tumors and Lead to an Adverse Clinical Outcome
Cancer Res., March 1, 2009; 69(5): 2000 - 2009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. B. Heimberger, M. Abou-Ghazal, C. Reina-Ortiz, D. S. Yang, W. Sun, W. Qiao, N. Hiraoka, and G. N. Fuller
Incidence and Prognostic Impact of FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells in Human Gliomas
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 14(16): 5166 - 5172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. I. Al-Shibli, T. Donnem, S. Al-Saad, M. Persson, R. M. Bremnes, and L.-T. Busund
Prognostic Effect of Epithelial and Stromal Lymphocyte Infiltration in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 14(16): 5220 - 5227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Bergmann, L. Strauss, Y. Wang, M. J. Szczepanski, S. Lang, J. T. Johnson, and T. L. Whiteside
T Regulatory Type 1 Cells in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Mechanisms of Suppression and Expansion in Advanced Disease
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3706 - 3715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Badoual, G. Bouchaud, N. E. H. Agueznay, E. Mortier, S. Hans, A. Gey, F. Fernani, S. Peyrard, P. L. -Puig, P. Bruneval, et al.
The Soluble {alpha} Chain of Interleukin-15 Receptor: A Proinflammatory Molecule Associated with Tumor Progression in Head and Neck Cancer
Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 68(10): 3907 - 3914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
P. Choi, C. D. Jordan, E. Mendez, J. Houck, B. Yueh, D. G. Farwell, N. Futran, and C. Chen
Examination of Oral Cancer Biomarkers by Tissue Microarray Analysis
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 2008; 134(5): 539 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. E. C. Lutsiak, Y. Tagaya, A. J. Adams, J. Schlom, and H. Sabzevari
Tumor-Induced Impairment of TCR Signaling Results in Compromised Functionality of Tumor-Infiltrating Regulatory T Cells
J. Immunol., May 1, 2008; 180(9): 5871 - 5881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. Katou, H. Ohtani, Y. Watanabe, T. Nakayama, O. Yoshie, and K. Hashimoto
Differing Phenotypes between Intraepithelial and Stromal Lymphocytes in Early-Stage Tongue Cancer
Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 67(23): 11195 - 11201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Leon, K. Garcia, J. Carneiro, and A. Lage
How Regulatory CD25+CD4+ T Cells Impinge on Tumor Immunobiology: The Differential Response of Tumors to Therapies
J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 5659 - 5668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Strauss, C. Bergmann, W. Gooding, J. T. Johnson, and T. L. Whiteside
The Frequency and Suppressor Function of CD4+CD25highFoxp3+ T Cells in the Circulation of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 13(21): 6301 - 6311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Strauss, C. Bergmann, M. Szczepanski, W. Gooding, J. T. Johnson, and T. L. Whiteside
A Unique Subset of CD4+CD25highFoxp3+ T Cells Secreting Interleukin-10 and Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Mediates Suppression in the Tumor Microenvironment
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 13(15): 4345 - 4354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. Yakirevich and M. B. Resnick
Regulatory T Lymphocytes: Pivotal Components of the Host Antitumor Response
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2007; 25(18): 2506 - 2508.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
Q. Gao, S.-J. Qiu, J. Fan, J. Zhou, X.-Y. Wang, Y.-S. Xiao, Y. Xu, Y.-W. Li, and Z.-Y. Tang
Intratumoral Balance of Regulatory and Cytotoxic T Cells Is Associated With Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Resection
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2007; 25(18): 2586 - 2593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
H. G. Soysal and F. Markoc
Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelids and periorbital region
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2007; 91(3): 325 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. Kobayashi, N. Hiraoka, W. Yamagami, H. Ojima, Y. Kanai, T. Kosuge, A. Nakajima, and S. Hirohashi
FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells Affect the Development and Progression of Hepatocarcinogenesis
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 13(3): 902 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. Zorn and J. Ritz
Studying Human Regulatory T Cells In vivo.
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 12(18): 5265 - 5267.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. Hiraoka, K. Onozato, T. Kosuge, and S. Hirohashi
Prevalence of FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells Increases During the Progression of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Its Premalignant Lesions.
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 12(18): 5423 - 5434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badoual, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tartour, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Badoual, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tartour, E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online