
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Therapy: Preclinical |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Institute of Pharmacology and Institute of Pharmacy, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; Departments of 2 Medicine and 3 Cancer Biology and 4 Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; and 5 Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; 6 Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Requests for reprints: Carlos L. Arteaga, Division of Oncology/Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2220 Pierce Avenue, 777 PRB, Nashville, TN 37232-6307. Phone: 615-936-3524; Fax: 615-936-1790; E-mail: carlos.arteaga{at}vanderbilt.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design: BT-474 xenografts established in athymic nude mice were eliminated by trastuzumab. Continuous cell lines (HR for Herceptin resistant) were generated from tumors that recurred in the presence of continuous antibody therapy.
Results: The isolated cells behaved resistant to trastuzumab in culture as well as when reinjected into nude mice. They retained HER2 gene amplification and trastuzumab binding and were exquisitely sensitive to peripheral blood mononuclear cells ex vivo in the presence of the antibody. The HR cells exhibited higher levels of phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and EGFR/HER2 heterodimers. Phosphorylation of HER2 in HR cells was inhibited by the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib. Gefitinib also inhibited the basal association of p85 with phosphorylated HER3 in HR cells. Both inhibitors as well as the dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitor, lapatinib, induced apoptosis of the HR cells in culture. Growth of established HR5 xenografts was inhibited by erlotinib in vivo. In addition, the HR cells overexpressed EGFR, transforming growth factor
, heparin-binding EGF, and heregulin RNAs compared with the parental trastuzumab-sensitive cells.
Conclusions: These results are consistent with the inability of trastuzumab to block the heterodimerization of HER2 and suggest that amplification of ligand-induced activation of ErbB receptors is a plausible mechanism of acquired resistance to trastuzumab that should be investigated in primary mammary cancers.
Amplification of the HER2/neu (ERBB2) gene occurs in
25% of invasive breast cancers and is associated with poor patient outcome (6). Trastuzumab (Herceptin), a humanized monoclonal IgG1 that binds to the ectodomain of HER2, induces clinical responses in HER2-overexpressing breast cancers and prolongs patient survival when combined with chemotherapy (7–13). The clinical efficacy of trastuzumab seems limited to breast cancers that overexpress HER2 as measured by intense membrane staining in the majority of tumor cells with HER2 antibodies (3+ by immunohistochemistry) or excess copies of the HER2 gene determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Therefore, HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization is the biomarker predictive of good odds of response to treatment with the antibody. However, many patients with HER2 gene-amplified metastatic breast cancers do not respond or eventually escape trastuzumab, suggesting both de novo and acquired mechanisms of therapeutic resistance.
Several studies have already reported or speculated on potential mechanisms of resistance to trastuzumab. For example, overexpression of the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor or increased levels of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor/HER2 heterodimers (14, 15), which potently activate phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and its downstream effector Akt, abrogate trastuzumab action when transfected into antibody-sensitive human breast cancer cells. Amplification of the PI3K pathway as a result of loss or low levels of the phosphatase PTEN in primary tumors is also associated with lower odds of response to trastuzumab (16). Exogenous ligands of the EGFR and HER3/4 coreceptors have been shown to rescue from the antiproliferative effect of the antibody (17, 18). This is consistent with structural and cellular data using ErbB receptor ectodomains and different HER2 monoclonal antibodies, which show that trastuzumab is unable to block ligand-induced EGFR/HER2 and HER2/HER3 heterodimers (19, 20). Finally, Anido et al. (21) reported the presence of HER2 COOH-terminal fragments that result from alternative translation initiation from methionines near the transmembrane domain of the full-length receptor molecule. These fragments are kinase active but lack the trastuzumab binding epitope and, therefore, can potentially allow the cancer cell to escape antibody action. Despite these important leads, there is/are no biomarker(s) than can reliably predict lack of benefit from trastuzumab, which in turn can be used for subsequent clinical trial development and/or individual therapeutic decisions.
In this report, we describe the generation of trastuzumab-resistant BT-474 cells in vivo. The resistant cells retained HER2 gene amplification and trastuzumab binding. They exhibited higher levels of phosphorylated EGFR (P-EGFR) and EGFR/HER2 heterodimers as well as overexpression of EGFR, transforming growth factor
(TGF
), heparin-binding EGF, and heregulin RNAs compared with the parental trastuzumab-sensitive cells, suggesting enhanced EGFR-mediated activation of HER2. Small-molecule inhibitors of EGFR and HER2 were effective against the antibody-resistant cells, suggesting that (a) they were still dependent on the ErbB receptor network and (b) amplification of ligand-induced activation of ErbB receptors is a potential mechanism of acquired resistance to trastuzumab.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
was from R&D Systems. HER2 gene copy/protein levels and antibody binding. HER2 gene copy number was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization using HER2 Spectrum Orange and CEP17 Spectrum Green probes (Vysis) as described (22). Enumeration of HER2 and CEP17 signals was done on 25 consecutive cells. Images of representative cells were captured at x630 with a single-bandpass filter for the detection of Spectrum Orange, Spectrum Aqua, or 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole using IP Labs imaging software package (Scanalytics, Inc.). To determine HER2 surface levels, we followed the procedure described by Moulder et al. (18). Cells in Eppendorf tubes (5 x 105 per tube) were washed three times with staining buffer (5% heat-inactivated FCS in PBS) and then treated with either 200 µg/mL Cy3-conjugated trastuzumab or Cy3-conjugated normal mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Both samples were incubated for 45 min on ice and washed three times with staining buffer. Flow cytometry of Cy3-labeled cells was done using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).
To determine trastuzumab binding affinity, cells were grown to confluence, then washed twice with cold serum-free medium, and subsequently incubated with 1 ng/mL 125I-trastuzumab (specific activity, 200,000 cpm/µg) with or without increasing concentrations of unlabeled trastuzumab in triplicate wells for 3 h at 4°C while rocking. After three washes on ice with cold PBS, cells were solubilized with 0.5 N NaOH and cell-associated cpm was measured in a Beckman gamma counter. For standardization purposes, we obtained cell counts from unlabeled wells that were handled similarly to wells containing cells labeled with 125I-trastuzumab. Percentage binding = [cpm sample / cpm control (no unlabeled antibody)] x 100; a best curve fit was generated with GraphPad Prism 4 software and the EC50 was calculated using a one site competition equation: Y = bottom + (top – bottom) / 1 + 10(X – logEC50), where X is log (concentration) and Y is binding.
Anchorage-independent and three-dimensional growth assays and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling. Colony-forming assays in 0.8% agarose were done as described previously (23) in the presence or absence of inhibitors. Cells (3 x 104 per dish) in 35-mm dishes were incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C for 7 to 10 days. Tumor cell colonies measuring
50 µm were counted using the Omnicon tumor colony analyzer (BioLogics, Inc.). For three-dimensional growth assays, cells were seeded in six-well plates (2 x 106 per well) in growth factor-reduced Matrigel (BD Biosciences) diluted 1:3 with IMEM. Inhibitors were added to the medium at the time of cell seeding and replaced every 3 days. Colonies were photographed using an Olympus DP10 camera mounted in an inverted microscope. After 10 to 14 days, cells were trypsinized and counted in a Zeiss Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter). To measure apoptosis, adherent cells were treated with inhibitors in serum-free medium; after 48 h, both floating and adherent cells were pooled and subjected to terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling analysis using the APO-bromodeoxyuridine kit (Phoenix Flow Systems) as described (REF) following the manufacturer's protocol.
Establishment of resistant xenografts/cells and mouse studies. Five-week-old female BALB/c athymic nude mice (Harlan Sprague-Dawley) were implanted with 0.72 mg, 60-day release, 17ß-estradiol pellets (Innovative Research). The next day,
2 x 107 BT-474 cells suspended in (300 µL) growth factor-reduced Matrigel were injected s.c. in the right flank via a 22-gauge, 1.5-inch needle. Once tumors reached a volume
200 mm3, mice were treated with 20 mg/kg trastuzumab diluted in sterile PBS by i.p. injection twice a week. Tumor diameters were serially measured with calipers and tumor volumes were calculated by the formula: volume = width2 x length / 2. Tumors that responded completely and then recurred in the presence of maintained therapy with trastuzumab were harvested, minced, and digested with 0.25% trypsin in IMEM containing antibiotics and DNase for 30 min at room temperature. Cell suspensions were filtered through several layers of sterile gauze, washed twice with serum-containing IMEM, and seeded onto tissue culture flasks in IMEM/10% FCS. For therapeutic studies, antibody-sensitive and antibody-resistant cell lines were injected following the same protocol. Once tumors reached a volume
250 mm3, mice were randomly allocated to treatment with PBS, trastuzumab 20 mg/kg i.p. twice a week, or erlotinib 200 mg/kg daily administered via orogastric gavage.
Immunoblot analysis and immunoprecipitation. After washes with ice-cold PBS, cells were scraped into EBC lysis buffer [50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 120 mmol/L NaCl, 0.5% NP40, 100 mmol/L NaF, 200 µmol/L Na3VO4, 10 µg/mL each aprotinin, leupeptin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and pepstatin] and incubated for 20 min at 4°C while rocking. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation (10 min at 12,000 rpm, 4°C) and protein concentrations were determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay reagent (Pierce). SDS-PAGE, transfer to nitrocellulose, and immunoblot analysis were done as described previously (24). Horseradish peroxidase–linked IgG (Amersham Pharmacia) was used as secondary antibody. Primary antibodies also used for immunoprecipitation included the following: HER2/neu and total EGFR Ab-12 (Neomarkers); phosphorylated tyrosine (P-Tyr) and p85 (Upstate Biotechnology); Y1068 P-EGFR, Y1248 phosphorylated HER2, Y1289 phosphorylated HER3, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), Akt, and S473 phosphorylated Akt (P-Akt; Cell Signaling); phosphorylated MAPK (P-MAPK; Promega Corp.); and HER3 and HER4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Immunoprecipitations were done as described previously (24) using 0.5 1 mg protein from whole-cell lysates.
Real-time quantitative PCR (Taqman) analysis. RNA was isolated using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini kit. Gene expression was quantified by real-time quantitative PCR or Taqman using 100 ng of total RNA per reaction as described previously (25). The sequences of the primer/probe sets used for this analysis are as follows: EGFR 5'-GCCTTGAGTCATCTATTCAAGCAC-3' (F), 5'-TGCTACTGTCATTCGCACCTG-3' (R), and 5'-FAM-AGCTCTGGCCACAACAGGGCATTTT-TAMRA-p-3' (P); HER2/neu 5'-TCTGGACGTGCCAGTGTGAA-3' (F), 5'-TGCTCCCTGAGGACACATCA-3' (R), and 5'-FAM-CAGAAGGCCAAGTCCGCAGAAGCC-TAMRA-p-3' (P); HER3 5'-TTCTCTACTCTACCATTGCCCAAC-3' (F), 5'-CACCACTATCTCAGCATCTCGGTC-3' (R), and 5'-FAM-ACACCAACTCCAGCCACGCTCTGC-TAMRA-p-3' (P); HER4 5'-GAGATAACCAGCATTGAGCACAAC-3' (F), 5'-AGAGGCAGGTAACGAAACTGATTA-3' (R), and 5'-FAM CCTCTCCTTCCTGCGGTCTGTTCGA-TAMRA-p-3' (P); EGF 5'-AGCTAACCCATTATGGCAACA-3' (F), 5'-AGTTTTCACTGAGTCAGCTCCAT-3' (R), and 5-FAM-AGGGCCCTGGACCCACCAC-TAMRA-p-3' (P); TGF
5'-GGACAGCACTGCCAGAGA-3' (F), 5'-CAGGTGATTACAGGCCAAGTAG-3' (R), and 5'-FAM-CCTGGGTGTGCCACAGACCTTC-TAMRA-p-3' (P); HRG 5'-TGGCTGACAGCAGGACTAAC-3' (F), 5'-CTGGCCTGGATTTCTTC-3' (R), and 5'-FAM-CAGCAGGCCGCTTCTCGACAC-TAMRA-p-3' (P); amphiregulin 5'-ATATCACATTGGAGTCACTGCCCA-3' (F), 5'-GGGTCCATTGTCTTATGATCCAC-3' (R), and 5'-FAM-AGCCATAAATGATGAGTCGGTCCTCTTTCC-TAMRA-p-3' (P); heparin-binding EGF, 5'-GAAAGACTTCCATCTAGTCACAAAGA-3' (F), 5'-GGGAGGCCCAATCCTAGA-3' (R), and 5-FAM-TCCTTCGTCCCCAGTTGCCG-TAMRA-p-3' (P); betacellulin 5'-TGCCCCAAGCAATACAAGC-3' (F), 5'-CGTCTGCTCGGCCACC-3' (R), 5'-FAM-AAGCGGCATCTCCCTTTGATGCAGTAA-TAMRA-p-3' (P); and epiregulin 5'-TGCATGCAATTTAAAGTAACTTATTTGACTA-3' (F), 5'-ATCTTAAGGTACACAATTATCAAAGCTGA-3' (R), and 5'-FAM-TCGGATTACTGAATTGTATCAATTTGTTTGTGTTCA-TAMRA-p-3' (P), where F and R are the forward and reverse primers, respectively, and P is the Taqman probe (FAM as reporter and TAMRA as quencher). Human cDNA FLJ22101 fis (Genbank accession no. AK025754) was used as a housekeeping gene for normalization of EGFR family receptor and ligand gene expression. Primer/probe sets for FLJ22101 are as follows: 5'-TTCCCTGTGGCACTTGACATT-3' (F), 5'-CTTTTGCCTCTGGCAGTACTCA-3' (R), and 5'-FAM-TGTCTTAAAGTTTTTGAAGTACATCTTCTGGCCCC-TAMRA-p-3' (P). Taqman One-Step Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) was used for all reactions. Taqman reaction was done in a standard 96-well plate format with ABI 7500 real-time quantitative PCR system. For data analysis, raw dCt was first normalized to a housekeeping gene for each sample to get dCt. The normalized dCt was then calibrated to BT-474 control to get ddCt. In the final step of data analysis, the ddCt was converted to fold change (2–
Ct) relative to control.
Northern hybridization. Total RNA from BT-474, HR5, and HR6 cells was prepared using the RNeasy Mini kit. Twenty micrograms of total RNA per lane were loaded and separated by electrophoresis on 1.2% formaldehyde-agarose gel and transferred to nylon membranes (Hybond N+, Amersham) in 20 x SSC (150 mmol/L NaCl, 15 mmol/L sodium citrate). Prehybridization (2 h) and hybridization (overnight) were carried out in a roller bottle at 50°C in ExpressHyb hybridization solution (BD Biosciences). The hybridized membrane was washed in 2x SSC, 0.1% SDS twice at room temperature, and 0.1x SSC, 0.1% SDS twice at 60°C. Hybridization signals were detected by autoradiography.
TGF
immunoassay. Subconfluent, exponentially growing cells (106 cells/60 mm-dish) were incubated in 1 mL of serum-free medium supplemented with 20 µg/mL of the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab (provided by Dan Hicklin, Imclone Systems, Inc., New York, New York) to block EGFR ligand internalization. After 24 h, the medium conditioned by cells was collected and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C to remove cell debris. TGF
protein in cell conditioned medium was quantitated by sandwich enzyme immunoassay using the TGF
Quantikine kit (R&D Systems). In brief, standards and cell media are added to a 96-well microplate plate coated with a TGF
antibody and incubated for 2 h at room temperature followed by four washes with 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS. A horseradish peroxidase–linked antibody was next added to the wells for additional 2 h. Following another set of washes, a substrate solution containing tetramethylbenzidine was added to the wells with color developing in proportion to the amount of TGF
bound in the initial step. The colorimetric reaction was stopped by acidification with 2 N sulfuric acid and absorbance was measured at 459 and 570 nm. TGF
activity equivalents were calculated from the standard curve and expressed as pg/mL/106 cells/24 h.
Peripheral blood cell–induced cytotoxicity. BT-474, HR (for Herceptin resistant), and MDA-468 (HER2 negative) cells were labeled in 24-well plates with 200 µCi/mL Na251CrO4 (Amersham Corp.) for 60 min at 37°C; unbound radioactivity was removed after two washes. Single-donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from healthy volunteers by Ficoll-Hypaque discontinuous gradient centrifugation and washed twice. Effector PBMCs and 51Cr-labeled (target) cancer cells were coincubated in ratios of 1:1, 3:1, 10:1, and 30:1 in quadruplicate wells in a humidified CO2 incubator for 4 h at 37°C. Wells containing target cells alone served as controls for spontaneous release (SR) of 51Cr (cell lysis). Labeled cells were counted by
scintillography to determine total release (TR) of radioactivity. After centrifugation at 750 x g for 10 min at room temperature, the supernatant (SN) was removed for determination of radioactivity. Percentage cytotoxicity was calculated from the formula: 100 x (cpm in SN – SR) / TR – SR.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
6-fold HER2 gene amplification (Fig. 1B, bottom). HER2 protein levels by immunoblot analysis of whole-cell lysates were also similar among sensitive and resistant cells (Fig. 1C).
|
1 nmol/L) outcompeted 50% (EC50) of 125I-antibody binding in HR5 and HR6 cells compared with BT-474 cells (
3 nmol/L; Fig. 2B), suggesting that trastuzumab binding affinity was not impaired in the resistant cells.
|
RIII-expressing immune effector cells, which in turn mediate cell lysis of the tumor target cells (26). Thus, to examine the consequences of antibody binding as they apply to ADCC and a differential sensitivity of the resistant cells to immune cells, we coincubated 51Cr-labeled BT-474 and HR cells with human PBMCs. All three cell lines exhibited identical percentage cytotoxicity when incubated with increasing numbers of effector cells (Fig. 2C), suggesting that the HR cells were not intrinsically resistant to ADCC. No cytotoxicity was observed when using PBMCs and 51Cr-labeled HER2-negative MDA-468 human breast cancer cells in the presence of trastuzumab (data not shown). HR cells retain resistant phenotype in culture. We determined whether the resistant cells generated in mice retained their phenotype in vitro. Cells were plated in Matrigel and followed in the absence or presence of a receptor-saturating concentration of trastuzumab (13 nmol/L). Colony formation of BT-474 cells was markedly reduced (>90%), whereas growth of HR cells was unaffected by treatment with trastuzumab (Fig. 3A ). In cell lines, xenografts, and primary breast tumors, trastuzumab has been shown to inhibit activity of postreceptor signal transducers (18, 22, 27, 28) and it has been proposed that these biochemical responses are required for the antitumor action of the antibody against HER2-overexpressing cells. In addition, loss or low levels of PTEN have been associated with trastuzumab resistance (16). Therefore, we examined PTEN content and the effect of trastuzumab on basal activation of MAPK and Akt as measured by antibodies specific to P-MAPK and S473 P-Akt, respectively. PTEN levels were similar in BT-474 and HR cells. After an overnight incubation and consistent with the effects on three-dimensional growth in Matrigel, trastuzumab treatment inhibited P-MAPK and P-Akt in parental but not in either of the HR sublines (Fig. 3B). Interestingly, a P-Tyr immunoblot of HER2 pulldowns revealed slightly higher phosphorylation of HER2 in the HR cells. In all three cell sublines, this was increased by treatment with the antibody (Fig. 3B).
|
|
200-kDa P-Tyr band that was recognized by HER3 antibodies (Fig. 4C). These results imply that in the resistant cells, both HER2 and HER3 are transactivated by the EGFR.
We next examined the cytotoxic effect of EGFR inhibition in colony-forming assays and by measuring DNA double-strand breaks in the presence of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and flow cytometry. Treatment with 1 µmol/L gefitinib and erlotinib inhibited anchorage-independent growth of both HR5 and HR6 cells (Fig. 5A
). Consistent with these results, evidence of apoptosis was detected in 10% to 15% of cells after a 48-h treatment with the EGFR TKIs but not with trastuzumab (Fig. 5B). We next translated these results to an in vivo model by reinjecting HR5 cells into athymic nude mice. All mice formed tumors measuring
500 mm3 within 3 to 4 weeks. Treatment of established HR5 xenografts with trastuzumab did not affect growth whatsoever, whereas administration of erlotinib for 36 days prevented tumor growth. These data suggest that the antibody-resistant tumors are still dependent on the ErbB signaling network and, second, that the resistance to trastuzumab is a stable phenotype in the HR5 cells.
|
|
, heparin-binding EGF, and heregulin were also up-regulated in both HR cells. The levels of HER3, betacellulin, and epiregulin were unchanged, whereas amphiregulin RNA was lower in the resistant sublines (Fig. 7A
). Northern hybridization also confirmed the up-regulation of TGF
mRNA in HR5 and HR6 cells (Fig. 7B). Secreted TGF
as measured by immunoassay of cell conditioned medium revealed a close to 2-fold increased level of TGF
protein (Fig. 7C). These results suggest that exogenous TGF
would counteract the antitumor effect of the HER2 antibody against BT-474 cells. Therefore, we plated BT-474 cells in soft agarose and added trastuzumab ± TGF
. As predicted, the addition of TGF
to trastuzumab-treated BT-474 cells completed prevented the growth-inhibitory effect of the antibody (Fig. 7D). Similar results were obtained with heregulin (10 ng/mL)–treated BT-474 cells (data not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RIII (26), strongly implying that ADCC is the main mechanism of action of the IgG1 in vivo. The hybridoma (mouse) counterpart of trastuzumab, 4D5, partially removes HER2 from the plasma membrane, potentially preventing its interaction with ErbB coreceptors (33). Two recent articles, however, indicate that trastuzumab does not down-regulate and/or increase the endocytosis of HER2 but, instead, the antibody recycles to the cell surface with the internalized receptor (28, 34). Concurring with these two studies, we did not observe any change in surface HER2 in the resistant cells reported herein by examining levels of HER2 in streptavidin pulldowns from cell surface–biotinylated HR cells (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Other studies have reported an inhibitory effect of trastuzumab on postreceptor signal transduction. Nagata et al. (16) reported antibody-induced recruitment of PTEN to the cell membrane concordant with inhibition of its phosphatase activity by repressing Src-mediated inhibition of PTEN. Trastuzumab treatment inhibits phosphorylation of HER3 and disrupts the basal association of HER3 with HER2 and with p85
resulting in inhibition of PI3K and Akt activities (22). The antisignaling effect of trastuzumab against P-MAPK and P-Akt has also been observed in xenografts and breast primary tumors (18, 27). Suggesting that the inhibition of postreceptor signal transduction is required for trastuzumab action, up-regulation of PI3K and Akt by RNA interference of PTEN and/or overexpression of mutant active Akt confer resistance to trastuzumab (16, 22). Finally, trastuzumab binding blocks the metalloproteinase-mediated cleavage at the juxtamembrane region of HER2 (35), which is associated with the generation of a catalytically active 95-kDa NH2 terminal fragment of HER2 and shedding of the ectodomain of receptor (36). It remains to be determined whether loss of any of these cellular mechanisms is causally associated with resistance to trastuzumab in patients with breast cancer.
Because of the reported effects of trastuzumab on tumor host cells, specifically the recruitment of immune effector cells via its Fc domain (26) and the inhibition of tumor cell-stimulated endothelial cells (37), we decided to generate antibody-resistant cells in athymic nude mice. Although deficient in T cells, these mice have natural killer cells and macrophages/monocytes, capable of generating ADCC (38). Most established BT-474 xenografts regressed completely on treatment with trastuzumab and some tumors recurred promptly. The (HR) cells isolated from the resistant xenografts retained HER2 gene amplification and trastuzumab binding and were exquisitely sensitive to PBMCs ex vivo in the presence of the antibody, suggesting that they were not intrinsically resistant to ADCC. Their resistant phenotype was retained in culture as well as when reinjected in nude mice. However, they overexpressed EGFR, TGF
, heparin-binding EGF, and heregulin RNAs compared with the parental trastuzumab-sensitive cells. We speculate that the increased EGFR RNA levels are the result of ligand-mediated induction; this autoinduction has been shown in other epithelial cells (39, 40).
In support of EGFR-mediated transactivation of HER2, the HR cells exhibited higher levels of P-EGFR and EGFR/HER2 heterodimers. Second, phosphorylation of HER2 was inhibited by EGFR-specific concentrations of the EGFR TKIs erlotinib and gefitinib. Third, both inhibitors induced significant apoptosis of the HR cells in culture and growth of established HR5 xenografts was inhibited by erlotinib in vivo. These results are consistent with the inability of trastuzumab to block the heterodimerization of HER2 with ErbB coreceptors (41). Moreover, in parental and resistant cells, gefitinib disrupted the constitutive association of p85 with HER3 and inhibited P-Akt, further suggesting that activation of PI3K/Akt in the resistant cells remains dependent on the ErbB signaling network via tyrosine phosphorylation of HER3. Notably, we observed antibody-induced phosphorylation of HER2 in both parental and HR cells simultaneous with reduction in P-MAPK and P-Akt (Figs. 3B and 4B). These ligand-like effects have been reported previously with other HER2 (bivalent) monoclonal antibodies but they do not necessarily result in mitogenesis nor negate their antitumor effect (42–45). The significance of this result will require further investigation.
The role of EGFR/HER2 cross-talk in transformation and tumor progression is supported by multiple examples in mouse models and primary human tumors. For example, coexpression of the EGFR ligand TGF
and Neu in the mammary gland of transgenic mice markedly accelerates tumor onset and progression compared with mice expressing Neu or TGF
transgenes alone. In this model, TGF
x Neu bitransgenic mice exhibited increased tyrosine phosphorylation of both EGFR and Neu (46) and tumor latency was markedly delayed by administration of the EGFR TKI AG-1478 (47). In an analysis of 807 invasive breast cancers, 306 HER2-positive tumors also expressed EGFR by immunohistochemistry. Ninety-seven percent of cancers with phosphorylated HER2 at Y1248 exhibited detectable EGFR and the combination of Y1248 phosphorylated HER2 together with cooverexpression of HER2 and EGFR was associated with the shortest patient survival (48). HER2 is overexpressed in a cohort of non–small cell lung cancers and increased HER2 gene copy number has been associated with therapeutic response to EGFR TKIs (49, 50).
There is also evidence that amplification of EGFR/HER2 cross-talk, as acquired by the trastuzumab-resistant HR cells, can prevent the antitumor action of the antibody. For example, exogenous EGF, TGF
, betacellulin, and heregulin have been shown to rescue from or attenuate the antiproliferative effect of HER2 antibodies (17, 18, 51). Transfection of a TGF
vector into SKBR-3 cells impairs trastuzumab-induced down-regulation of HER2 (52). MKN7 gastric cancer cells overexpress activated EGFR and are insensitive to 4D5 (53). In these cells, submicromolar concentrations of gefitinib inhibit P-EGFR and restore sensitivity to trastuzumab.7 To our knowledge, this is the first report in which amplification of EGFR/HER2 cross-talk is associated with acquired resistance to trastuzumab. We surmise that in these complexes, HER2 is still an amplifier of EGFR signals. Thus, as supported by the experiment with lapatinib shown in Fig. 6, we speculate that direct inhibitors of the HER2 kinase will still be effective in this setting. This is consistent with recent reports in which patients with HER-overexpressing tumors that had progressed on trastuzumab responded to the EGFR/HER2 inhibitors lapatinib and HKI-272 (54–56).
Taken together, the results presented herein with in vivo selected BT-474 cells suggest that amplification of ligand-induced activation of ErbB receptors is a plausible mechanism of acquired resistance to trastuzumab. This underscores the need to profile levels of ErbB ligands and receptors and, eventually, ErbB receptor heterodimers in HER2-overexpressing tumors treated with trastuzumab not only before therapy but also particularly when acquired resistance occurs. These data also suggest that the combined inhibition of EGFR and HER2 can be synergistic against HER2-overexpressing breast cancers and/or dampen the emergence of acquired resistance. Along those lines, synergy of trastuzumab with the EGFR/HER2 TKI lapatinib (57) and with pertuzumab (58), a HER2 antibody that blocks heterodimerization of HER2 with other ErbB receptors, has been reported in preclinical models and is currently being investigated clinically.
| Footnotes |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).
7 C.L. Arteaga, unpublished data. ![]()
Received 3/26/07; revised 5/ 7/07; accepted 6/ 5/07.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol 1996;16:5726–36.[Abstract]
bigenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:9609–14.
expression impairs trastuzumab-induced HER2 downregulation. Oncogene 2005;24:3002–10.[CrossRef][Medline]Commentary
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Dokmanovic, D. S. Hirsch, Y. Shen, and W. J. Wu Rac1 contributes to trastuzumab resistance of breast cancer cells: Rac1 as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2009; 8(6): 1557 - 1569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Narayan, J. A. Wilken, L. N. Harris, A. T. Baron, K. D. Kimbler, and N. J. Maihle Trastuzumab-Induced HER Reprogramming in "Resistant" Breast Carcinoma Cells Cancer Res., March 15, 2009; 69(6): 2191 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. K. WU, T. T. M. TSE, J. J. Y. SUNG, Z. J. LI, L. YU, and C. H. CHO Expression of ErbB Receptors and their Cognate Ligands in Gastric and Colon Cancer Cell Lines Anticancer Res, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 229 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Lewis Phillips, G. Li, D. L. Dugger, L. M. Crocker, K. L. Parsons, E. Mai, W. A. Blattler, J. M. Lambert, R. V.J. Chari, R. J. Lutz, et al. Targeting HER2-Positive Breast Cancer with Trastuzumab-DM1, an Antibody-Cytotoxic Drug Conjugate Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 68(22): 9280 - 9290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Arteaga, A. O'Neill, S. L. Moulder, M. Pins, J. A. Sparano, G. W. Sledge, and N. E. Davidson A Phase I-II Study of Combined Blockade of the ErbB Receptor Network with Trastuzumab and Gefitinib in Patients with HER2 (ErbB2)-Overexpressing Metastatic Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 14(19): 6277 - 6283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Wang, B. Xiang, M. Guix, M. G. Olivares, J. Parker, C. H. Chung, A. Pandiella, and C. L. Arteaga Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Engages TACE and ErbB3 To Activate Phosphatidylinositol-3 Kinase/Akt in ErbB2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer and Desensitizes Cells to Trastuzumab Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2008; 28(18): 5605 - 5620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Costantini, K. Bateman, K. McLarty, K. A. Vallis, and R. M. Reilly Trastuzumab-Resistant Breast Cancer Cells Remain Sensitive to the Auger Electron-Emitting Radiotherapeutic Agent 111In-NLS-Trastuzumab and Are Radiosensitized by Methotrexate J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1498 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Belkhiri, A. A. Dar, D. F. Peng, M. H. Razvi, C. Rinehart, C. L. Arteaga, and W. El-Rifai Expression of t-DARPP Mediates Trastuzumab Resistance in Breast Cancer Cells Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 14(14): 4564 - 4571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Rowe, T. Ozbay, L. M. Bender, and R. Nahta Nordihydroguaiaretic acid, a cytotoxic insulin-like growth factor-I receptor/HER2 inhibitor in trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2008; 7(7): 1900 - 1908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. McGowan, E. McKiernan, F. Bolster, B. M. Ryan, A. D. K. Hill, E. W. McDermott, D. Evoy, N. O'Higgins, J. Crown, and M. J. Duffy ADAM-17 predicts adverse outcome in patients with breast cancer Ann. Onc., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1075 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Contessa, M. S. Bhojani, H. H. Freeze, A. Rehemtulla, and T. S. Lawrence Inhibition of N-Linked Glycosylation Disrupts Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Signaling in Tumor Cells Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 68(10): 3803 - 3809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Shattuck, J. K. Miller, K. L. Carraway III, and C. Sweeney Met Receptor Contributes to Trastuzumab Resistance of Her2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer Cells Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 68(5): 1471 - 1477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Re and J. L. Cook The Basis of an Intracrine Pharmacology J. Clin. Pharmacol., March 1, 2008; 48(3): 344 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kumar ErbB-Dependent Signaling as a Determinant of Trastuzumab Resistance Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 13(16): 4657 - 4659. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |