Clinical Cancer Research Targets Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 13, 6993, December 1, 2007. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0942
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riesenberg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmermann, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riesenberg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmermann, W.

Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Expression of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase in Tumor Endothelial Cells Correlates with Long-term Survival of Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma

Rainer Riesenberg1, Christoph Weiler4, Oliver Spring1, Martin Eder1, Alexander Buchner1,2, Tanja Popp1, Mirna Castro1, Robert Kammerer1,5, Osamu Takikawa6, Rudolf A. Hatz3, Christian G. Stief2, Alfons Hofstetter1 and Wolfgang Zimmermann1

Authors' Affiliations: 1 Tumor Immunology Laboratory, LIFE Center, Departments of 2 Urology and 3 Surgery, University Clinic Grosshadern, 4 Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany; 5 Institute for Molecular Immunology, GSF National Research Center for the Environment and Health, Neuherberg, Germany; and 6 Laboratory of Radiation Safety, National Institute for Longevity Sciences, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Gengo, Morioka, Obu, Aichi, Japan

Requests for reprints: Wolfgang Zimmermann, Tumor Immunology Laboratory, LIFE Center, University Clinic Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University München, Marchioninistrasse 23, D-81377 Munich, Germany. Phone: 49-89-7095-4895; Fax: 49-89-7095-4864; E-mail: wolfgang.zimmermann{at}med.uni-muenchen.de.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: The inflammatory enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) participates in immune tolerance and tumor immune escape processes by degradation of the essential amino acid tryptophan and formation of toxic catabolites. Here, we analyzed the role of IDO in tumor growth and disease progression in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Experimental Design: Expression of IDO mRNA was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR in 55 primary and 52 metastatic RCC, along with 32 normal kidneys. Western blot and immunohistochemistry analyses were used to semiquantitatively determine IDO proteins in a subset of tumor samples, in RCC cell lines, and microvessel endothelial cells. IDO expression was correlated with expression of the proliferation marker Ki67 in tumor cells and survival of patients with tumor.

Results: More than 75% of the clear cell RCC in comparison to normal kidney contained elevated levels of IDO mRNA, which correlated with their IDO protein content. Low IDO mRNA levels in primary tumors represented an unfavorable independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 3.8; P = 0.016). Unexpectedly, immunohistochemical analyses revealed that IDO is nearly exclusively expressed in endothelial cells of newly formed blood vessels and is virtually absent from tumor cells, although RCC cells could principally synthesize IDO as shown by in vitro stimulation with IFN-{gamma}. A highly significant inverse correlation between the density of IDO-positive microvessels and the content of proliferating Ki67-positive tumor cells in primary and metastatic clear cell RCC was found (P = 0.004).

Conclusions: IDO in endothelial cells might limit the influx of tryptophan from the blood to the tumor or generate tumor-toxic metabolites, thus restricting tumor growth and contributing to survival.


Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 3% of all tumors. In 2006, RCC was diagnosed in nearly 40,000 patients in the United States, and 13,000 died from this disease (1). At the time of diagnosis, 30% of the patients clinically present with metastases and an additional 30% of the patients will develop metastases during the subsequent course of their disease (2). Once metastasis has occurred, the prognosis of patients with RCC is very poor because RCC is largely refractory to radiation therapy and chemotherapy.

However, RCC represents one of the few immunogenic tumors (3). Consequently, the current first line therapy for patients with metastasized RCC involves nonspecific immunotherapy with interleukin-2 and/or IFN-{alpha} cytokines with or without 5-fluorouracil treatment albeit with only 5% to 10% durable responses (4, 5). Immune escape mechanisms may be responsible for the limited success of immunotherapies in patients with RCC (6, 7).

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO; EC 1.13.11.52) catalyzes the rate-limiting initial step in the catabolism of the essential amino acid L-tryptophan by formation of kynurenine derivatives. IDO is induced by IFN-{gamma} in a variety of cells and seems to be a key player in the innate immune system mediating inhibition of intracellular pathogens by tryptophan depletion and/or generation of toxic metabolites (8, 9). Furthermore, antigen-presenting cells, like subsets of dendritic cells and macrophages, could mediate immunoregulatory functions via IDO through cell cycle arrest in T cells (10).

Overexpression of IDO in otherwise immunogenic murine tumor cells prevents rejection by T cells and treatment of tumor cells with IDO-specific small interfering RNA postponed tumor formation in mice suggesting an immunosuppressive function in tumors (11, 12). Cancer cells of a number of human malignancies constitutively express IDO (11). Therefore, IDO might also play a role in tumor immune escape in humans. Indeed, patients with IDO-positive ovarian, colorectal, endometrial, and esophageal tumors have a worse prognosis (1316). Based on these observations, it has been suggested that IDO inhibitors should be used to support tumor therapies (17, 18). On the other hand, IDO has also been shown to correlate well with good prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and non–small cell lung cancer tumors (19, 20). This has been attributed to the presence of IDO-positive tumor-infiltrating leukocytes which might express IDO due to the existence of a TH1 cytokine milieu in the tumor (20).

We reasoned that the immunogenic RCC tumors should especially benefit from the presence of IDO. Therefore, we investigated IDO expression in primary clear cell RCC tumors, clear cell RCC metastases from different organs, and normal tissue from tumor-bearing kidneys. Interestingly, patients with high IDO mRNA contents in their tumors exhibited longer survival. Surprisingly, immunohistochemical analyses revealed that IDO is nearly exclusively expressed in endothelial cells of predominantly newly formed blood vessels. The frequency of IDO-positive microvessels inversely correlated with the content of proliferating tumor cells in primary and metastatic clear cell RCC. Therefore, IDO in endothelial cells might limit the influx of the essential amino acid tryptophan from the blood to the tumor cells or generate tumor-toxic metabolites, thus restricting tumor growth.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients. We retrospectively analyzed 55 unselected clear cell RCC primary tumors and 52 metastases samples from patients who underwent surgical tumor resection between 1990 and 2005, and were subsequently followed for a median of 26 months. Follow-up data were available for 52 patients with primary and 48 patients with metastatic RCC. For 10 patients (8 with follow-up), both primary and metastatic tumors were analyzed. Clinical and histopathologic data are summarized in Table 1 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Correlation of IDO expression in primary RCC and clinicopathologic variables

 
Tissue samples. Clear cell RCC samples and tumor-free tissue from tumor-bearing kidneys were obtained from radical nephrectomies. Samples were snap-frozen within 30 min of surgery and stored in liquid nitrogen. Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were retrieved from the archives of the Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany. For paraffin embedding, standard fixation and dehydration procedures were used. The study was approved by the local ethics committee; all patients gave written consent.

Cell culture. The cell lines A498 and HEK293 were obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collection. The cell line RCC26 was kindly provided by Schendel et al. (21). The cells were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 1 mmol/L of sodium pyruvate, 4 mmol/L of L-glutamine, 100 µg/mL of streptomycin, 100 units/mL of penicillin (complete RPMI; all from Life Technologies). Primary human dermal microvessel endothelial cells (HDMEC; PromoCell) were grown for three passages in Endothelial Cell Growth Medium MV Cells (PromoCell).

Immunohistochemical procedures and estimation of IDO- and Ki67-positive cell density. Sections from paraffin wax–embedded tissue were deparaffinized in Roti-Histol (Carl Roth GmbH), rehydrated and microwaved for 30 min in 0.1% boric acid or Target Retrieval Solution at pH 9 (DakoCytomation). Cytocentrifuge preparations of HDMECs were obtained by sedimentation at 100 x g for 5 min using a Cytospin 2 centrifuge (Shandon). Cells were fixed in acetone for 10 min at room temperature. Sections and cytocentrifuge cell preparations were treated by standard procedures to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Slides were incubated for 20 min in PBS, containing 3% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) or 2.5% horse serum to reduce nonspecific binding prior to addition of monoclonal mouse antibodies against IDO (35 µg/mL; ref. 22), CEA and CEACAM1 (4/3/17, Genovac GmbH; 10 µg/mL), CD31 (clone JC70A; 17 µg/mL), CD45 (clones 2B11 and PD7/26; 7 µg/mL), Ki67 (clone MIB-1; 0.8 µg/mL), {alpha}-smooth muscle actin (clone HHF35, 1:200) all from DakoCytomation and CD34 (QBEnd/10, 8 µg/mL; Ventana Medical Systems S.A.), podoplanin (clone 18H5, 1:20; Acris). Immunohistochemical staining with the latter three antibodies was done using the Benchmark XT slide preparation system (Ventana Medical Systems S.A.) according to the manufacturer's specifications. For all other stainings, antibodies diluted with PBS were incubated at room temperature for 1 to 2 h. Slides were rinsed thrice in PBS and subsequently incubated either with rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:100; DakoCytomation) as secondary antibody or ImmPRESS Reagent (Vector Laboratories) followed by staining with 0.03% diaminobenzidine (CD34, {alpha}-smooth muscle actin) or 3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.03% H2O2 in sodium acetate buffer (0.1 mol/L; pH 5.2) for 15 min. Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. To estimate the density of IDO- and Ki67-expressing microvessels and tumor cells, respectively, at least 25 high-power magnification fields (x400) randomly distributed over the tumor area of the tissue sections were evaluated using an ocular grid.

Isolation of peripheral blood T cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were separated by centrifugation through a Ficoll/Hypaque (Pharmacia) density gradient (density = 1.077 g/mL). Cells from the interphase of the gradient were harvested, washed twice with PBS and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were positively selected by MACS sorting (Miltenyi Biotec).

Cocultures and cytokine stimulation. RCC cells at a density of 0.5 x 105 cells per well were cocultured for 3 days with 5 x 105 purified CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from a healthy donor in complete RPMI 1640 in 24-well plates. Every 3rd day, half of the medium was replaced with fresh medium. Cells were harvested and IDO mRNA expression was analyzed after removal of lymphocytes by MACS using anti-CD45 antibodies. Cytokine stimulation of RCC cells was done by growing subconfluent cultures in six-well plates with or without 50 ng/mL of IFN-{gamma} (PeproTech) for 3 days. The reversibility of IFN-{gamma} action was measured after incubation of the cells for 3 days with IFN-{gamma} as above, replacement of the IFN-{gamma}–containing medium with fresh medium (day 0) and retrieval of samples at the indicated time points for quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses.

RNA isolation and real-time RT-PCR. Total mRNA was isolated from 5 x 106 cells, 10 to 20 10-µm tissue cryosections or 30 mg of tissue pulverized under liquid nitrogen using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). The RNA yield was quantified photometrically and the quality-assessed by capillary electrophoresis (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and RNA 6000 Pico Kit; Agilent Technologies Deutschland). Total RNAs from human normal tissues were purchased from Chemicon International and BioCat GmbH. One microgram of total RNA (RNA integrity number > 5) was used for complementary DNAs (cDNA) syntheses by reverse transcription using the Reverse Transcription System (Promega). The RNA integrity number provided by the Agilent system allows a quantitative estimate of the RNA quality (23). cDNAs were amplified by quantitative PCR with the LightCycler 2.0 System (LightCycler FastStart DNA MasterPlus SYBR Green I Kit; Roche). Human β-actin cDNA was quantified using the LightCycler Primer Set (SearchLC GmbH). The relative amounts of IDO cDNA were determined from 1 of 20 of the reverse transcription reactions using the sense primer 5'-GGTCATGGAGATGTCCGTAA-3' and the antisense primer 5'-ACCAATAGAGAGACCAGGAAGAA-3' (11) and the following conditions: initial denaturation step, 95°C for 10 min; denaturation, 95°C for 10 s; annealing, 60°C for 10 s; extension, 72°C for 16 s; 35 cycles. We used the default setting of the LightCycler instrument to determine the crossing point (number of cycles needed to obtain a certain amount of PCR product). Only a crossing point of < 31 could be determined under these conditions. Smaller cDNA levels were set to 31 cycles resulting in normalized amounts of < 10 (see formula below). Relative amounts of β-actin and IDO cDNA were calculated as follows: relative amountβ-actin cDNA = 2–CP β-actin x 107; relative β-actin normalized amountIDO cDNA = 2CP β-actin/2CP IDO x 104. The factors 107 and 104 were chosen arbitrarily. Analysis of the PCR products by agarose gel electrophoresis revealed single DNA fragments with expected sizes. The relative interassay standard deviation for the determination of the β-actin and IDO cDNA content by quantitative PCR using pooled primary RCC and normal kidney samples was 18% and 23%, respectively.

Western blot analyses. Cell and tissue lysates were generated from ≥1 x 106 cells washed twice with PBS or 10 to 20 10-µm tissue cryosections using 100 µL of lysis buffer [50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.5% NP40, 0.1% SDS, and protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Complete Mini, Roche Diagnostics GmbH)]. HEK293 cells (3-4 x 105/well) were transiently transfected for 24 h with a human IDO expression plasmid (pCMV-SPORT6-IDO; RZPD Deutsches Ressourcenzentrum für Genomforschung GmbH) in a six-well plate using FuGene6 Transfection Reagent (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). Thirty or 40 µg of total protein were size-fractionated by electrophoresis in 4% to 12% NuPage Novex Bis-Tris SDS polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen GmbH) and transferred to a Hybond-P polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH). IDO was visualized by luminescence (ECL Kit, Amersham) using Hyperfilm ECL (Amersham) after incubation with anti-human IDO antibody (2 µg/mL) and horseradish peroxidase–coupled sheep anti-mouse IgG. β-Actin was detected after removal of the IDO antibody by incubation with 100 mmol/L of 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, 62.5 mmol/L of Tris-Cl (pH 6.7) for 30 min at 60°C with a mouse anti-human β-actin monoclonal antibody (0.4 µg/mL; clone AC-74; Sigma-Aldrich) by luminescence as above.

Statistical analysis. The {chi}2 test was used to examine both the correlation between IDO mRNA level and categorized variables and between the density of IDO-positive microvessels and that of tumor cells with Ki67-positive nuclei. A density of ≥8 Ki67-positive nuclei and ≥1 IDO-positive microvessels per high-power magnification field (400x) were considered as high, values below that were considered low. Comparison of IDO mRNA expression between different tissues was done with the Mann-Whitney U test. The influence of IDO expression and other factors on prognosis was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. Survival time was the interval between surgical tissue resection and tumor-specific death. Multivariate analysis was done using the Cox proportional hazards model. For all tests, P < 0.05 was regarded as significant. All statistical calculations were done using the software STATISTICA for Windows (release 7.1, StatSoft).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IDO mRNA and protein in primary RCC and metastases. To determine the content of IDO mRNA in 55 clear cell RCC primary tumors, 52 clear cell RCC metastases, and in 32 normal kidney samples, we used gene-specific quantitative RT-PCR. The IDO cDNA levels of the various tissues were normalized by their β-actin cDNA content. The mean β-actin cDNA content of tumor tissues was found to be about twice as high as that of normal renal tissues (Fig. 1A ). Both primary and metastatic tumor tissues exhibited similar broad IDO mRNA expression levels covering three 10logs (Fig. 1B). On average, 24- and 32-fold higher IDO cDNA levels were measured in primary tumors and metastases, respectively, in comparison to tissue from normal kidneys. No significant differences were detected between primary tumors and metastases and for RCC metastases found in the adrenal, lymph node, and lung. No IDO mRNA or low levels were observed in liver, brain, and breast metastases (Fig. 1B). The mean of IDO mRNA levels in primary and metastatic RCC tissues is as high as that found for spleen. Maximal tumor IDO mRNA levels were higher as found in placental tissue where IDO is known to be involved in local immunoregulation, indicating that in some RCC tumors, IDO levels might be of functional relevance (Fig. 1B and C). IDO mRNA could also be detected in additional normal tissues (placenta > spleen > small intestine > lung > uterus > duodenum).


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. IDO cDNA levels in primary RCC tumors, RCC metastases, and normal tissues. Total RNA was isolated from 32 normal kidneys, 55 primary and 52 metastatic RCC, and β-actin and IDO cDNA were amplified by quantitative PCR after reverse transcription using gene-specific primers. Relative amounts of β-actin cDNA levels are plotted in arbitrary units; bars, mean. A, both primary tumor and metastases samples contain 2-fold higher β-actin cDNA levels in comparison to normal kidney. B, the IDO cDNA content was normalized by the sample's β-actin cDNA content (see Materials and Methods). The differences in IDO cDNA content in primary tumors and metastases as well as in metastases resected from adrenal gland, lymph nodes, or lung are not statistically significant. C, the IDO cDNA content of a pool of cDNA from 20 unselected primary RCC tumors was compared with that of various normal human tissues.

 
To investigate whether IDO transcripts are accompanied by the presence of IDO protein, primary RCC and RCC metastases from different organs were assessed by Western blot analyses using an IDO-specific monoclonal antibody (22). The antibody detected a 40 to 42 kDa peptide in HEK293 cells transiently transfected with an IDO expression vector consistent with the size of the IDO protein (Fig. 2 ). Bands of the same size were detected in extracts of primary and metastatic RCC tumor tissues. Their intensity was found to correlate with the corresponding IDO mRNA levels (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. IDO cDNA levels correlate with the IDO protein content in RCC primary tumors and metastases. Forty micrograms of protein from primary and metastatic RCC (met) tissue extracts from different patients, and as a size control, extracts from HEK293 cells transfected with an IDO expression vector were size-fractionated. IDO and β-actin (for exemplary samples) were visualized by luminescence after incubation with IDO- and β-actin–specific monoclonal antibodies and a peroxidase-coupled secondary antibody. Left, mobility of the protein size markers. Bottom of the IDO blots, the IDO cDNA content (normalized for β-actin cDNA content) of primary and metastatic RCC tissue.

 
Tumor endothelial cells are responsible for IDO expression in RCC. Immunohistochemistry with the IDO-specific monoclonal antibody was used to identify the cell population responsible for IDO production. Surprisingly, endothelial cells within the tumor tissues represented the most prominent IDO-positive cell population in both primary RCC (7 out of 17) and RCC metastases from the adrenal gland (1 of 1), lymph node (1 of 5), and lung (3 of 4). Their identity was proven by staining with anti-CD31/PECAM1 and anti-CD34 monoclonal antibodies which specifically detect endothelial cells in RCC (Fig. 3A and B ; data not shown). The absence of staining with an antipodoplanin monoclonal antibody ruled out a lymphatic origin of these vessels (data not shown; ref. 24). Both small and large blood vessels were IDO-positive (Fig. 3A and D). However, IDO-positive blood vessels, mostly a minority of all tumor blood vessels, tended to cluster in certain regions of the tumors. These regions were often separated by strands of stromal tissue rich in collagen and other extracellular matrix proteins as revealed by Elastica van Gieson staining or at the tumor periphery with no evidence of preferential CD45-positive leukocyte infiltration (Fig. 3A; data not shown). In general, tumors with IDO-positive endothelial cells exhibited a high microvascular density (data not shown). In addition to the focal staining of vascular endothelial cells, occasionally, small fractions of CD45-positive leukocyte infiltrates at the periphery of tumors stained positive for IDO (Fig. 3I and J). With the exception of lymph node metastases (see below), no IDO-positive tumor cells were detected within primary and metastatic tumor samples. No IDO-positive cells could be identified in nontumorous adjacent renal tissue (data not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. IDO is mainly expressed in endothelial cells in RCC primary tumors and metastases. Sections from paraffin wax–embedded tissues from primary RCC (A-G, I, J, P-S), a lung metastasis (H) and lymph node RCC metastases from two different patients (K-O) were incubated with anti-IDO (A, D, H, I, K, M, P, R), anti-CD34 (B, G, O), anti-CEACAM1 (C, E, N), anti–{alpha}-smooth muscle actin ({alpha}-actin; F), or anti-Ki67 antibodies (L, Q, S) followed by a peroxidase-labeled anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody and staining with 3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole (red; A, C, D, E, H-N, P-S) and diaminobenzidine (brown; B, F, G, O), respectively. The tissue sections were counterstained with Mayer's hemalum. IDO expression is observed in regional clusters of endothelial cells of small and large vessels in primary and metastatic RCC (A, D, and H; filled arrowheads and inset in A). Not all blood vessels which can be identified by the pan-endothelial cell marker CD34 in parallel sections expressed IDO (open arrowheads in A, compare with B and G). In parallel sections, newly formed and mature vessels were identified by detection of CEACAM1 and {alpha}-smooth muscle actin, respectively (filled arrowheads in E). Endothelial cells of large vessels do not express CEACAM1 (C and E, open arrowheads). A subset of focally infiltrating leukocytes, identified by staining for the leukocyte marker CD45, at the tumor periphery expresses IDO (I and J). Tumor cells and not endothelial cells at the periphery of two RCC lymph node metastases express IDO (K and M; arrows and insets). In one case, the IDO-positive tumor cells are next to lymphatic tissue with germinal centers containing a large fraction of proliferative B cells identified by the proliferation marker Ki67 (K and L). IDO-positive tumor cells lie next to the microvessels surrounding the tumor nodules (M-O). Inverse expression of IDO (P and R) and Ki67 (Q and S) in parallel sections of primary RCC. Note the presence of only a few Ki67-positive nuclei (arrows) in the IDO-positive tumor. gc, germinal center; li, leukocyte infiltrate; s, stromal septum; t, tumor. Bars, 200 µm (A-H, K-S), 100 µm (I and J; inset in A), and 50 µm (insets in K and M).

 
To further characterize the IDO-positive blood vessels, we used CEACAM1 and {alpha}-smooth muscle actin as additional markers which allows the discrimination of endothelia, newly formed by neoangiogenesis, from mature blood vessels (25, 26). The CEACAM1 antibody used in this study (4/3/17) is specific for CEACAM1 in the absence of the closely related CEACAM5/CEA, which is not present in kidney and RCC tissues (27). Interestingly, CEACAM1 showed the most similar expression pattern in comparison to that found for IDO in being also restricted to microvessels of certain areas of the tumor. However, CEACAM1 expression was observed in endothelia of additional tumor areas which were negative for IDO. IDO-positive endothelial cells were almost always positive for CEACAM1 with the exception of few larger mature vessels which did not express CEACAM1. The latter could be shown to represent more mature, stabilized vessels which can be identified by the presence of vessel-covering pericytes using their {alpha}-smooth muscle actin content as a marker (Fig. 3D-G; refs. 26, 28). CEACAM1 has been reported to be predominantly expressed in newly formed tumor endothelial cells but also in microvessels of the normal kidney (27, 29).

We noted that out of a total of 27 RCC tumors, two lymph node metastases (out of five analyzed) contained a small fraction of IDO-positive tumor cells, mostly at the tumor margins. There, the tumor cells were in close contact with lymphoid tissue with highly proliferative lymphocytes in germinal centers, as shown by Ki67 staining (see arrows and insets in Fig. 3K and L), and in the neighborhood of newly formed microvessels visualized by staining with anti-CEACAM1 antibodies (Fig. 3N and O). In the areas with IDO-positive tumor cells, no IDO-positive endothelial cells could be identified but elsewhere in one of the two lymph node metastases some endothelial cells were IDO-positive but associated tumor cells were not (Fig. 3M and O; data not shown).

We hypothesized that the tryptophan-degrading enzyme IDO in endothelial cells might reduce the influx of the essential amino acid tryptophan into the surrounding tumor tissue and thus diminishing protein synthesis possibly coupled with a decrease in tumor cell proliferation. To test this hypothesis, we identified proliferating tumor cells positive for the proliferation marker Ki67 and, in adjacent sections, the density of IDO-positive blood vessels in the tumor. A highly significant inverse correlation between the mean numbers of IDO-positive microvessels and Ki67-positive tumor cells per high-power magnification field measured across the tumors was noted ({chi}2 test; P = 0.004; Figs. 3P-S and 4 ).


Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Inverse correlation between IDO-positive microvessels and Ki67-positive tumor cell density in RCC tumors. For estimation of the density of IDO-expressing tumor microvessels and Ki67-positive tumor cells, at least 25 high-power magnification fields (x400) randomly distributed over the whole tumor area of the tissue sections were evaluated using an ocular grid and the mean values were plotted. Seventeen primary (bullet) and 10 metastatic RCC samples (from different patients; {circ}) were analyzed. Dotted lines, the cutoff between values regarded as low and high for the {chi}2 test calculation.

 
IDO mRNA levels in primary and metastatic RCC correlate with longer survival. Because ~25% of the patients with RCC showed IDO mRNA levels as low as that found in normal kidney, and another 25% of the patients exhibited IDO mRNA levels higher than those of normal spleen (Fig. 1), we wanted to know whether patients with low and high IDO mRNA contents differed in the progression of their disease. We analyzed overall survival in relation to IDO mRNA levels of primary tumors and metastases. Surprisingly, patients with a high IDO mRNA content in either their primary tumors or metastases exhibited a trend of longer overall survival in comparison to patients with lower levels. Various cutoff values of IDO mRNA levels have been tested to separate patients with different disease outcomes. When increasing the cutoff levels, the discrimination between the two prognosis groups improved. The 80th percentile was the highest tested to restrict group size imbalance. At this level, P values of 0.09 and 0.22 were obtained for primary RCC and RCC metastases, respectively (Fig. 5A and B ). A similar relation between cutoff percentile and P value was found when performing multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard regression model). Patients with IDO mRNA levels below the 50th percentile had a hazard ratio of 2.2 (P = 0.057); below the 80th percentile, a hazard ration of 3.8 (P = 0.016). IDO mRNA levels below the 80th percentile represent an independent prognostic factor (Table 2 ).


Figure 5
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. IDO cDNA content in primary (A) and metastatic RCC (B) correlates with longer survival. The influence of IDO expression in primary RCC (52 patients) and RCC metastases (48 patients) on prognosis was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. Survival time was the interval between surgical tissue resection and tumor-specific death. Various cutoff values for relative IDO cDNA levels were tested. Discrimination between two groups of patients with different outcomes improved when the cutoff percentile of IDO mRNA levels was increased. The 80th percentile was the highest tested to restrict imbalance of group size. The number of patients at risk during the follow-up time when the number of patients in the low-risk group dropped to 50% are indicated.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Multivariate analyses of overall survival in patients with RCC

 
Induction of IDO by IFN-{gamma} and activated lymphocytes. Because endothelial and, in rare circumstances, tumor cells express IDO only in certain areas of RCC tumors, we wanted to know which factors could modulate IDO expression in these cells. Cytokines, like the TH1 cytokine IFN-{gamma}, could be produced by, e.g., activated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and are able to activate a number of genes. Therefore, we analyzed the capability of IFN-{gamma} to induce IDO in primary HDMEC. Indeed, in the presence of IFN-{gamma} for 2.5 days, the production of IDO protein and IDO mRNA was strongly induced in endothelial cells as shown by quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot analysis, respectively (Fig. 6A and C ). Immunocytologic analyses indicate that most endothelial cells are capable of synthesizing IDO (Fig. 6B). To further clarify the unexpected results that in most primary tumors and metastases endothelial cells, rather than tumor cells or tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, express IDO as found for other tumors (1315, 19, 20), we investigated whether RCC cells are in principle capable of synthesizing IDO. We analyzed two RCC cell lines, RCC26 and A498, for the presence of IDO mRNA by quantitative RT-PCR and IDO protein by Western blot analysis. No IDO transcripts or IDO protein could be identified in these RCC cell lines. However, 3 days after the addition of IFN-{gamma}, IDO mRNA and IDO protein could be clearly detected in both RCC cell lines at a level similar to that found in IFN-{gamma}–stimulated endothelial cells (Fig. 6A, C, and D, inset). The induction of IDO mRNA was reversible. Three days after the removal of IFN-{gamma}, baseline levels of IDO mRNA were observed in A498 RCC cells (Fig. 6D). Furthermore, the addition of allogeneic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to both RCC cell lines also induced the expression of the IDO gene, suggesting the possible in vivo induction of IDO mRNA upon attack of tumor cells by tumor-specific cytotoxic T cells or other immune cells (Fig. 6E).


Figure 6
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. IDO mRNA and protein can be induced in microvessel endothelial cells (HDMEC) and RCC cell lines by IFN-{gamma} and activated T cells. HDMEC and RCC cell lines which had been incubated for 2.5 d (HDMEC) or 3 d (RCC26, A498) with or without 80 and 50 ng/mL of IFN-{gamma}, respectively, were analyzed for the presence of IDO protein by Western blot analysis (A) or IDO mRNA by quantitative RT-PCR (C and D, inset). The reversibility of IDO mRNA induction by IFN-{gamma} after replacement of the IFN-{gamma}–containing medium with fresh medium for the indicated times (D) and the induction of IDO mRNA in RCC cells by activated T cells (E) were followed by quantitative RT-PCR. Thirty micrograms of protein from cell lysates and extracts from HEK293 cells transfected with an IDO expression vector or vector alone were size-fractionated by electrophoresis through a 4% to 10% gradient SDS polyacrylamide gel and blotted to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. IDO was visualized by luminescence after incubation with an IDO-specific monoclonal antibody and peroxidase-coupled secondary antibody. The blot was reprobed with an anti-human β-actin monoclonal antibody to show equal pairwise loading (A). HDMEC were analyzed by immunocytology for the presence of IDO protein with or without prior IFN-{gamma} treatment (80 ng/mL, 2.5 d). About 75% of the cells were stained by the IDO antibody (B). Quantitative RT-PCR was used to estimate the amount of IDO cDNA in total RNA obtained from HDMEC (C), A498 cells collected after transient stimulation with IFN-{gamma} (D), and from RCC26 and A498 RCC cells incubated for 3 d with or without purified allogeneic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (E) after normalization for the β-actin cDNA content.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumors derived from a wide spectrum of tissues and organs have been described to express the tryptophan-catabolizing enzyme IDO (11, 1315, 19, 20). Previously, either the tumor cells or infiltrating leukocytes were found to be responsible for IDO expression in tumors. In this report, we describe for the first time that the tumor vasculature could be the main source of IDO in tumors.

More than 75% of the analyzed RCC tissues exhibited IDO mRNA levels higher than that found in normal kidney (Fig. 1). The presence of IDO in both primary tumors and metastases of patients with RCC indicates that IDO expression in the tumor vasculature is a stable property of the tumor and is maintained upon metastatic spread. At present, it is unclear how IDO expression is induced in tumor blood vessels. IFN-{gamma} has been identified as the most potent inducer, but other cytokines and inflammatory stimuli like IFN-{alpha}, IFN-β, and Toll-like receptor ligands, although to a lesser degree, could also stimulate IDO formation (30). Modulation of IDO expression by interleukin-4, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, transforming growth factor-β, and prostaglandin E2 has also been noticed (31). In mice, systemic expression of IDO in vascular endothelial cells following experimental infection with malaria pathogens has been described. In this system, IFN-{gamma} seems to constitute an indispensable mediator as no induction was observed in IFN-{gamma}–/– mice (32). Thus, two main scenarios involving the active role of the tumor or the host can be envisioned. First, tumor cells directly induce IDO expression in tumor endothelial cells. The factors involved might be connected with neoangiogenesis because IDO expression is preferentially found in the periphery of tumors where neoangiogenesis is favored (33). Furthermore, in RCC, the expression domain of IDO in endothelial cells is largely overlapping, although more restricted, with that of CEACAM1 which has been shown to be involved in tumor neoangiogenesis (29). Second, tumor-infiltrating activated leukocytes could create a cytokine milieu that allows the expression of IDO in tumor microvessels. Indeed, large numbers of both natural killer cells and cytotoxic T cells can be found in RCC known for its immunogenicity (3, 34). However, no positive correlation between the number of infiltrating CD45-positve leukocytes and IDO expression in tumor endothelial cells was noted in the analyzed tumor samples possibly due to lack of activation of the leukocytes.

RCC tumor cells do not constitutively express IDO as it is found for other tumors (11, 1315). Possibly, malignancy-associated genetic changes differing among tumor types, like inactivation of the IDO-regulating tumor suppressor Bin1, might be involved in differential expression of IDO in tumors (35). However, induction of IDO in RCC tumor cells is principally possible both in vitro and in vivo as shown by in vitro stimulation of IDO through IFN-{gamma} or activated T cells and the observation of IDO-expressing tumor cells in RCC lymph node metastases (Fig. 3). The observed restriction of IDO-positive RCC tumor cells to lymph node metastases hints towards the involvement of activated immune cells in the induction of the IDO gene in RCC cells. Furthermore, because the induction of IDO expression is rapidly reversible (Fig. 6D), continued stimulation needed for expression might only be possible in the neighborhood of massive accumulation of activated lymphocytes as that found in lymph nodes.

The amount of IDO mRNA in RCC primary and metastatic tumors is comparable to that found in tissues in which functional significance has been shown (Fig. 1; placenta, spleen; refs. 10, 36). There is a close correlation between IDO mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the presence of IDO protein–positive microvessels in primary and metastatic RCC could be clearly shown in more than one-third of the tumors (immunohistochemical score "high expression" in 10 out of 27 analyzed tumors; Fig. 4). Significantly, the observed strong inverse correlation between the density of IDO-expressing microvessels in the tumor and the number of proliferating Ki67-positive tumor cells suggests that IDO in endothelial cells inhibits the proliferation of RCC cells by deprivation of the essential amino acid tryptophan, or by the formation of tumor-toxic tryptophan metabolites. This could lead to prolonged survival of patients with IDO-positive RCC tumors as indicated by the survival data presented in this study (Fig. 5; Table 2). Indeed, Ki67 is a prognostic marker for patients with RCC, and low labeling indices of tumor cell nuclei with anti-Ki67 antibodies correlate with longer survival (37). This interpretation could also explain the observation that in RCC, high microvessel (differentiated) density, which seems to be a prerequisite for vascular IDO expression (see Results) significantly correlates with lower tumor grade and longer patient survival (38).

At present, it is not clear whether RCC tumor cell proliferation could indeed be inhibited by low tryptophan concentrations or kynurenine pathway metabolites as found for T cells and intracellular pathogens (39). Furthermore, it still has to be shown that expression of IDO in endothelial cells indeed limits the access of tryptophan to the surrounding tissue. This hypothesis could be validated in a murine model in which (tumor) endothelial cells by intravenous application of IDO-inducing factors or genetic engineering can be induced to constitutively or conditionally produce IDO.

Based on the role of IDO in immune tolerance induction in tumor cells as well as in dendritic cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes, the use of small molecule IDO inhibitors, like 1-methyl-tryptophan, has been suggested for the treatment of cancer patients. Indeed, IDO inhibitors have been shown to enhance the chemotherapy of tumors in murine models (17, 18). Our study indicates that the role of IDO in tumor-host interactions seems to be more complex than anticipated. In certain tumors, the expression of IDO might even be beneficial for the patient by mediating the suppression of tumor growth. Therefore, selective enhancement of IDO expression in endothelial cells, but not in tumor cells, in patients with RCC or induction of de novo synthesis in endothelial cells of other tumors might represent a new therapeutic approach.


    Acknowledgments
 
The excellent technical assistance by Anja Hennig is gratefully acknowledged. RCC26 cells, RCC bone metastases samples, and endothelial cells were kindly provided by Dolores J. Schendel, Institute for Molecular Immunology, GSF National Research Center for the Environment and Health, Neuherberg, Germany; Hans Roland Dürr and Sabine Schrepfer, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany, respectively. We thank Süleyman Ergün for his helpful comments on CEACAM1 expression in tumor vessels.


    Footnotes
 
Grant support: Deutsche Krebshilfe 106141 (A. Buchner and W. Zimmermann) and the University of Munich (FoeFoLe 02/2004 and 23/2004, Promotionsstudium Molekulare Medizin; O. Spring and M. Eder).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Conflict of interest statement: None of the authors has a financial or other relationship that might lead to a conflict of interest.

Note: This work is part of the thesis of O. Spring and M. Eder at the University of Munich.

Received 4/20/07; revised 8/14/07; accepted 9/11/07.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cancer facts and figures 2006. American Cancer Society; 2006.
  2. Flanigan RC, Campbell SC, Clark JI, Picken MM. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2003;4:385–90.[Medline]
  3. Schendel DJ, Oberneder R, Falk CS, et al. Cellular and molecular analyses of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restricted and non-MHC-restricted effector cells recognizing renal cell carcinomas: problems and perspectives for immunotherapy. J Mol Med 1997;75:400–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Atzpodien J, Kirchner H, Illiger HJ, et al. IL-2 in combination with IFN-{alpha} and 5-FU versus tamoxifen in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: long-term results of a controlled randomized clinical trial. Br J Cancer 2001;85:1130–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Ravaud A, Trufflandier N, Ferriere JM, et al. Subcutaneous interleukin-2, interferon alpha-2b and 5-fluorouracil in metastatic renal cell carcinoma as second-line treatment after failure of previous immunotherapy: a phase II trial. Br J Cancer 2003;89:2213–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Atkins D, Ferrone S, Schmahl GE, Storkel S, Seliger B. Down-regulation of HLA class I antigen processing molecules: an immune escape mechanism of renal cell carcinoma? J Urol 2004;171:885–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Lin KY, Lu D, Hung CF, et al. Ectopic expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 as a new mechanism for tumor immune evasion. Cancer Res 2007;67:1832–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Thomas SM, Garrity LF, Brandt CR, et al. IFN-{gamma}-mediated antimicrobial response. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-deficient mutant host cells no longer inhibit intracellular Chlamydia spp. or Toxoplasma growth. J Immunol 1993;150:5529–34.[Abstract]
  9. Taylor MW, Feng GS. Relationship between interferon-{gamma}, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, and tryptophan catabolism. FASEB J 1991;5:2516–22.[Abstract]
  10. Mellor AL, Munn DH. IDO expression by dendritic cells: tolerance and tryptophan catabolism. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4:762–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Uyttenhove C, Pilotte L, Theate I, et al. Evidence for a tumoral immune resistance mechanism based on tryptophan degradation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Nat Med 2003;9:1269–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Zheng X, Koropatnick J, Li M, et al. Reinstalling antitumor immunity by inhibiting tumor-derived immunosuppressive molecule IDO through RNA interference. J Immunol 2006;177:5639–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Okamoto A, Nikaido T, Ochiai K, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase serves as a marker of poor prognosis in gene expression profiles of serous ovarian cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:6030–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Brandacher G, Perathoner A, Ladurner R, et al. Prognostic value of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression in colorectal cancer: effect on tumor-infiltrating T cells. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:1144–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ino K, Yoshida N, Kajiyama H, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is a novel prognostic indicator for endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer 2006;95:1555–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Sakurai K, Enomoto K, Amano S, et al. [Study of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression in patients of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2004;31:1780–2.[Medline]
  17. Muller AJ, Scherle PA. Targeting the mechanisms of tumoral immune tolerance with small-molecule inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 2006;6:613–25.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Hou DY, Muller AJ, Sharma MD, et al. Inhibition of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in dendritic cells by stereoisomers of 1-methyl-tryptophan correlates with antitumor responses. Cancer Res 2007;67:792–801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Astigiano S, Morandi B, Costa R, et al. Eosinophil granulocytes account for indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-mediated immune escape in human non-small cell lung cancer. Neoplasia 2005;7:390–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Ishio T, Goto S, Tahara K, Tone S, Kawano K, Kitano S. Immunoactivative role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;19:319–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Schendel DJ, Gansbacher B, Oberneder R, et al. Tumor-specific lysis of human renal cell carcinomas by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. I. HLA-A2-restricted recognition of autologous and allogeneic tumor lines. J Immunol 1993;151:4209–20.[Abstract]
  22. Takikawa O, Kuroiwa T, Yamazaki F, Kido R. Mechanism of interferon-{gamma} action. Characterization of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in cultured human cells induced by interferon-{gamma} and evaluation of the enzyme-mediated tryptophan degradation in its anticellular activity. J Biol Chem 1988;263:2041–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Schroeder A, Mueller O, Stocker S, et al. The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC Mol Biol 2006;7:3.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Breiteneder-Geleff S, Soleiman A, Horvat R, Amann G, Kowalski H, Kerjaschki D. [Podoplanin-a specific marker for lymphatic endothelium expressed in angiosarcoma]. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 1999;83:270–5.[Medline]
  25. Oliveira-Ferrer L, Tilki D, Ziegeler G, et al. Dual role of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 in angiogenesis and invasion of human urinary bladder cancer. Cancer Res 2004;64:8932–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. McDonald DM, Choyke PL. Imaging of angiogenesis: from microscope to clinic. Nat Med 2003;9:713–25.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Kammerer R, Riesenberg R, Weiler C, Lohrmann J, Schleypen J, Zimmermann W. The tumour suppressor gene CEACAM1 is completely but reversibly downregulated in renal cell carcinoma. J Pathol 2004;204:258–67.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Ergun S, Tilki D, Oliveira-Ferrer L, Schuch G, Kilic N. Significance of vascular stabilization for tumor growth and metastasis. Cancer Lett 2006;238:180–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Ergun S, Kilik N, Ziegeler G, et al. CEA-related cell adhesion molecule 1: a potent angiogenic factor and a major effector of vascular endothelial growth factor. Mol Cell 2000;5:311–20.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Takikawa O. Biochemical and medical aspects of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-initiated L-tryptophan metabolism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;338:12–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Thomas SR, Stocker R. Redox reactions related to indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and tryptophan metabolism along the kynurenine pathway. Redox Rep 1999;4:199–220.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Hansen AM, Ball HJ, Mitchell AJ, Miu J, Takikawa O, Hunt NH. Increased expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in murine malaria infection is predominantly localised to the vascular endothelium. Int J Parasitol 2004;34:1309–19.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Fox SB, Gatter KC, Bicknell R, et al. Relationship of endothelial cell proliferation to tumor vascularity in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 1993;53:4161–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Schleypen JS, Baur N, Kammerer R, et al. Cytotoxic markers and frequency predict functional capacity of natural killer cells infiltrating renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:718–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Muller AJ, DuHadaway JB, Donover PS, Sutanto-Ward E, Prendergast GC. Inhibition of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, an immunoregulatory target of the cancer suppression gene Bin1, potentiates cancer chemotherapy. Nat Med 2005;11:312–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Munn DH, Zhou M, Attwood JT, et al. Prevention of allogeneic fetal rejection by tryptophan catabolism. Science 1998;281:1191–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Dudderidge TJ, Stoeber K, Loddo M, et al. Mcm2, Geminin, and KI67 define proliferative state and are prognostic markers in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:2510–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Yao X, Qian CN, Zhang ZF, et al. Two distinct types of blood vessels in clear cell renal cell carcinoma have contrasting prognostic implications. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:161–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. King NJ, Thomas SR. Molecules in focus: indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2007;39:2167–72.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Maby-El Hajjami, P. Ame-Thomas, C. Pangault, O. Tribut, J. DeVos, R. Jean, N. Bescher, C. Monvoisin, J. Dulong, T. Lamy, et al.
Functional Alteration of the Lymphoma Stromal Cell Niche by the Cytokine Context: Role of Indoleamine-2,3 Dioxygenase
Cancer Res., April 1, 2009; 69(7): 3228 - 3237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M.-C. Yen, C.-C. Lin, Y.-L. Chen, S.-S. Huang, H.-J. Yang, C.-P. Chang, H.-Y. Lei, and M.-D. Lai
A Novel Cancer Therapy by Skin Delivery of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase siRNA
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2009; 15(2): 641 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riesenberg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmermann, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riesenberg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmermann, W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online