Clinical Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

Clinical Cancer Research 13, 1936-1946, March 15, 2007. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2398
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kudo-Saito, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hodge, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kudo-Saito, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hodge, J. W.

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Combination Therapy of an Orthotopic Renal Cell Carcinoma Model Using Intratumoral Vector-Mediated Costimulation and Systemic Interleukin-2

Chie Kudo-Saito1, Elizabeth K. Wansley1, M. Eilene Gruys2, Robert Wiltrout2, Jeffrey Schlom1 and James W. Hodge1

Authors' Affiliations: Laboratories of 1 Tumor Immunology and Biology and 2 Experimental Immunology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland

Requests for reprints: Jeffrey Schlom, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 10 Center Drive, Room 8B09, Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: 301-496-4343; Fax: 301-496-2756; E-mail: js141c{at}nih.gov.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: Interleukin (IL)-2 therapy is currently used for therapy of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, it is only effective in approximately 10% to 15% of patients, showing a need for additional therapies. We have previously described a replication-defective fowlpox vector encoding three costimulatory molecules (B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3), designated rF-TRICOM. Here, we show that intratumoral administration of rF-TRICOM in an orthotopic RCC model effectively enhances tumor immunogenicity and reduces tumor burden in mice and the combination of rF-TRICOM and IL-2 is more effective than either therapy alone.

Experimental Design: RCC cells were implanted under the capsule of the kidney, and mice were given rF-TRICOM intratumorally 14 days later. We compared the effect of rF-TRICOM, rF-granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and two doses of IL-2 and combinations of the above on antitumor efficacy and survival. Host CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were also evaluated.

Results: The results show that (a) systemic IL-2 therapy was moderately effective in the reduction of tumor burden in an orthotopic RCC model; (b) a single intratumoral injection of rF-TRICOM and rF-GM-CSF significantly reduced tumor burden; (c) the addition of systemic IL-2 to intratumoral rF-TRICOM/rF-GM-CSF administration resulted in further reduction of tumor burden, decrease in the incidence of metastasis, and extended survival in tumor-bearing mice above that seen with either treatment alone; and (d) CD8+ T cells played a critical role in the antitumor effect seen with rF-TRICOM/rF-GM-CSF + IL-2 therapy. Finally, the addition of systemic recombinant IL-15 or intratumoral vector-delivered IL-15 to intratumoral rF-TRICOM/rF-GM-CSF administration resulted in substantially more tumor-free mice than either therapy alone.

Conclusions: These studies show that intratumoral administration of rF-TRICOM admixed with rF-GM-CSF is effective at reducing tumor burden in mice and the addition of IL-2 further contributes to this effect. These studies thus form the rationale for combination immunotherapy clinical trials in patients with RCC.


Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is responsible for an estimated 36,000 new cases of cancer and >12,000 cancer deaths per year (1). Of these new cases, 30% to 40% of patients present with metastatic disease, with a 5-year survival rate of <5% (2). RCC is considered to be an "immunogenic" cancer, resulting in occasional spontaneous remissions (37). Consequently, several strategies using immunotherapy have been evaluated, including the use of the recombinant cytokines interleukin (IL)-2 and IFN-{alpha}, along with partial or radical nephrectomy (8, 9). The mechanism of action for IL-2 has not been fully elucidated, although its use in murine models suggests that the antitumor effect is due to the direct killing of tumor cells by activated T cells and natural killer cells (1013).

High-dose IL-2 therapy was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic RCC in 1992. At that time, the results of several phase II clinical trials showed ~15% objective response rate, with 7% of these being complete responses and 8% being partial responses (14). However, administration of high-dose IL-2 resulted in extensive toxicity, including fever, malaise, and, more seriously, grade 3 to 4 hypotension and capillary leak syndrome (14, 15). To address these toxicities, a clinical trial was done comparing high-dose IL-2 (600,000-720,000 IU/kg) with low-dose IL-2, where one tenth of the amount of IL-2 was given (72,000 IU/kg). In that trial, the response rate to high-dose IL-2 was significantly higher than that seen with low-dose IL-2 (21% and 13%, respectively), and the durability of the response seen in complete responders was greater in patients given high-dose IL-2 (16). However, there was no statistical advantage in overall survival using the high-dose IL-2 regimen versus the low-dose regimen and more toxicity was seen with the high-dose IL-2 regimen (16). Unfortunately, the toxicities seen with this therapy limit the patients who can receive high-dose IL-2 to those who can tolerate the side effects. There is a need for less toxic and more effective therapies for patients with RCC.

Various orthotopic models for renal carcinoma have been established to help identify new immunotherapies. The renal adenocarcinoma cell line Renca of BALB/c mice is one of the most commonly studied models of RCC (13). Recently, new preclinical transplantable orthotopic models have been described that share many ultrastructural features with human RCC (17, 18). In this study, we have used a RCC model that has been developed in BALB/c mice as a result of the carcinogen streptozotocin (18). This model is more reflective of human RCC in that the RCC#15 cell line grows more slowly than many of the murine renal cancer cell lines available (including Renca), thereby simulating tumor growth in humans more accurately. In addition, these tumors grow orthotopically under the capsule of the kidney and spontaneously metastasize to the lymph nodes and lungs, further mimicking the disease seen in humans (18).

Because IL-2 is only partially effective in human RCC therapy, other immunotherapeutic strategies might be used to add to or synergize with the effects of IL-2. RCC cells have been modified to express the costimulatory molecule B7-1 as both allogeneic and syngeneic whole tumor cell vaccines and show increased immunogenicity in vitro (19), whereas the results in a phase I clinical trial could not be differentiated from the effect of IL-2 because of the small number of patients in the study (20, 21). We and others have shown that the introduction of a single T-cell costimulatory molecule into carcinomas can enhance their immunogenicity (22, 23). We have previously described a replication-defective fowlpox virus that encodes three T-cell costimulatory molecules (B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3), designated rF-TRICOM (23). We have shown that introduction of rF-TRICOM into tumor cells can lead to enhanced signaling in T cells and enhanced T-cell killing in vitro (24). We thus hypothesized that intratumoral introduction of rF-TRICOM with IL-2 may enhance antitumor effects.

Few tumor-associated antigens for renal cancer (murine and/or human) have been described (9, 25, 26). Intratumoral administration of rF-TRICOM would directly introduce immunostimulatory molecules into the tumor milieu, thereby potentially exploiting the presence of multiple tumor antigens to induce and potentiate tumor-specific immune responses.

We showed here for the first time that (a) systemic IL-2 therapy (low or high dose) was moderately effective in the reduction of tumor burden in an orthotopic RCC model; (b) a single intratumoral injection of rF-TRICOM significantly reduced tumor burden; (c) the addition of rF-granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) augmented the antitumor effect seen with rF-TRICOM; (d) the addition of systemic low-dose IL-2 to intratumoral rF-TRICOM administration resulted in further reduction of tumor burden, decrease in the incidence of metastasis, and extended survival; (e) CD8 cells played an important role in the antitumor response seen in mice treated with rF-TRICOM + IL-2; and (f) antigen-specific T cells generated after rF-TRICOM admixed with rF-GM-CSF + IL-2 produced significantly higher levels of IFN-{gamma} and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) and lysed additional biologically distinct tumor cell lines much more effectively than T cells from mice treated with rF-TRICOM and rF-GM-CSF alone. Because the safety and biological activity of intratumoral TRICOM administration has now been established in patients (27), the studies reported here thus form the rationale for the clinical evaluation of the combined use of systemic IL-2 and intratumoral rF-TRICOM administration in patients with advanced RCC.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice. Female BALB/c mice were obtained from the National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research Animal Facility (Frederick, MD). Mice were housed and maintained under pathogen-free conditions in microisolator cages until used for experiments at 6 to 8 weeks of age.

Tumor cells. Streptozotocin-induced renal cell tumor line SIRCC-1.15 (designated RCC#15) has recently been isolated and characterized (18). The RCC#15 tumor develops spontaneous metastases to lung and mesenteric lymph nodes after implantation into kidneys. These tumor cells were determined not to be of clear cell pathology. No mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau or Ras genes were found. Immunogenicity of the RCC#15 cell line was tested, and the cells were found to be minimally to nonimmunogenic, as vaccination of mice with irradiated RCC#15 cells showed little protection against challenge with viable RCC#15 tumor cells. The RCC#15 cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for MHC class I and II and various costimulatory molecules, and the expression profile was found to be as follows: Kd+ (96% positive cells; mean fluorescence intensity, 308), I-Ad–, B7-1, B7-2, ICAM-1+ (35%; mean fluorescence intensity, 100), and LFA-3, CD40+ (69%; mean fluorescence intensity, 1,032). Syngeneic tumor cell lines, including Renca (from Dr. R.H. Wiltrout; ref. 11) and colon tumor cell CT26 (ATCC ID CRL-2638; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA), were also used in this study. These cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 units/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 1% sodium pyruvate, 1% nonessential amino acids, and 50 mmol/L 2-mercaptoethanol (designated 10% FCS/RPMI 1640). These adherent cells were harvested by a scraper and washed in PBS before use.

Recombinant poxvirus vectors. The recombinant fowlpox viruses containing the murine B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3 genes (designated rF-TRICOM), the recombinant fowlpox virus containing the murine GM-CSF gene (designated rF-GM-CSF), and recombinant wild-type fowlpox virus (FP-WT) were used as described elsewhere (23, 28). The recombinant fowlpox virus designated rF-IL-15 was generated by insertion of the murine IL-15 gene under the control of the 40-kb promoter at the FP14 site in the genome. The IL-15 cDNA was amplified from total mouse spleen RNA by reverse transcription-PCR using primers specific for the 5'-(dGGTACCGGTACCATGAAAATTTTGAAACCA) and the 3'-(dCTCGAGCTCGAGTCAGGACGTGTTGATGAA) ends of the open reading frame. The cDNA was cloned into a poxvirus transfer vector. Sequence analysis confirmed that no mutations were introduced in the cloning process. The recombinant fowlpox virus was generated by methods previously described (23, 28). Therion Biologics Corp. (Cambridge, MA) provided these poxviruses per a National Cancer Institute/Therion Cooperative Research and Development Agreement.

Intratumoral therapy of an orthotopic RCC tumor model using rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2. RCC#15 tumor cells (1 x 105/50 µL/kidney) were implanted under the capsule of the right kidney of BALB/c mice using 1 mL syringe with 30-gauge needle under anesthesia on day 0. Groups of mice received intratumoral administration (50 µL/tumor/kidney) of rF-TRICOM [1 x 108 plaque-forming units (pfu)] admixed with rF-GM-CSF (1 x 107 pfu) under anesthesia on day 14. The admixture will be referred to as rF-TRICOM/GM. Control mice received an intratumoral administration of buffer (PBS). The incision was closed with clips immediately after injection. Subsets of mice were injected i.p. with recombinant human IL-2 (Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., Nutley, NJ) at the same time as the intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration. The doses of IL-2 used in these studies were 16,000 IU twice daily for 4 days. This dose (16,000 IU) was used because it is equivalent to the standard of care dose given to humans for the therapy of RCC (29). On day 25 after tumor transplant, the mice were sacrificed and tumor size was measured using calipers. Groups of mice were also observed for survival. Tumor volumes were calculated as follows: tumor volume (mm3) = 0.5 x length x width2.

Depletion of effector cells from mice. To determine the requirement of effector cells in the antitumor activity induced by rF-TRICOM, mice were treated with anti-CD4 antibody ascitic fluid (GK1.5 hybridoma, 10x dilution, 100 µL/dose) to deplete CD4+ cells or with anti-CD8 antibody ascitic fluid (Lyt2.2 hybridoma, 10x dilution, 100 µL/dose) to deplete CD8+ cells during the rF-TRICOM therapy. Each antibody was injected i.p. into mice on days 12, 13, and 14 after tumor implantation; mice then received intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration on day 14. The antibody was injected every week for the duration of the experiment. Cell depletion was validated by flow cytometry using FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody or CyChrome-conjugated anti-CD8 (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA); >90% of the relevant cell population was depleted.

Lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine production assays. To evaluate T-cell immune responses to RCC#15 tumors, splenic T cells were tested for cell proliferation and cytokine production in response to irradiated RCC#15 tumor cells. First, spleen cells were dispersed into single-cell suspensions in 10% FCS/RPMI 1640 followed by RBC removal, and lymphocytes were then separated by centrifugation through a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient. The cells at the interface were collected and washed in 10% FCS/RPMI 1640, and CD4+ or CD8+ cells were isolated by negative selection and found to be >90% pure (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). The purified T cells (2 x 105 per well) were cultured with irradiated (with 2,000 rads) naive syngeneic splenocytes as antigen-presenting cells (APC; 5 x 105 per well) and with irradiated RCC#15 tumor cells (1 x 104 per well; responder to stimulant ratio, 20:1) in 10% FCS/RPMI 1640 in 96-well flat-bottomed plates for 5 days. T cells and APCs were cultured in medium only as a control. [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/well) was added to the wells for the last 24 h and harvested using a Tomtec cell harvester (Wallac, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). The incorporated radioactivity was measured using a liquid scintillation counter (Wallac 1205 Betaplate, Wallac).

To evaluate cytokine production from these cells in response to tumor antigens, the supernatant fluid was collected 72 h after culture and analyzed for murine cytokines using the Cytometric Bead Array kit (BD PharMingen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

gp70-specific CD8+ T-cell immune response. To evaluate CD8+ T-cell immune responses specific for endogenous retroviral gp70 antigen expressed on tumors, spleens were pooled and dispersed into single-cell suspensions and stimulated with 1 µg/mL of the H-2Ld–restricted gp70 peptide AH1423-431 (SPSYVYHQF; ref. 30). Six days later, bulk splenocytes were separated by centrifugation through a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient. For the assay of tumor-killing activity, the recovered lymphocytes and 51Cr-labeled target cells (RCC#15, Renca, or CT26, 5 x 103 per well) were incubated for 5 h (96-well U-bottomed plates), and radioactivity in supernatants was measured using a gamma counter (Corba Autogamma, Packard Instruments, Downers Grove, IL). The percentage of tumor lysis was calculated as follows: % tumor lysis = [(experimental cpm – spontaneous cpm) / (maximum cpm – spontaneous cpm)] x 100.

The lymphocytes described above were also tested for cytokine production in response to gp70 peptide. Recovered lymphocytes (5 x 105 cells per well) were restimulated with fresh irradiated naive splenocytes as APCs (5 x 106 cells per well) and with gp70 peptide (1 µg/mL). Twenty-four hours later, the supernatant fluid was collected and analyzed for IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} using the Cytometric Bead Array kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cytokine released in medium was subtracted from that induced by gp70 peptide, and the gp70-specific responses were depicted as {Delta} pg/mL.

Use of IL-15 with vaccine for the intratumoral therapy of RCC tumors. RCC#15 tumor cells (1 x 105/50 µL/kidney) were implanted under the capsule of the right kidney of BALB/c mice using 1 mL syringe with 30-gauge needle under anesthesia on day 0. Groups of mice received intratumoral administration (50 µL/tumor/kidney) of rF-TRICOM (1 x 108 pfu) admixed with rF-GM-CSF (1 x 107 pfu) under anesthesia on day 14. Control mice received an intratumoral administration of buffer (PBS). Two modalities of IL-15 were tested: recombinant murine IL-15 and vector-driven IL-15 via rF-IL-15. One subset of mice was injected i.p. with recombinant human IL-15 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) at 5 µg/dose, twice daily for 3 days. Another set of mice received intratumoral administration of rF-TRICOM admixed with rF-GM-CSF and 107 or 108 pfu rF-IL-15 under anesthesia on day 14. On day 25 after tumor transplant, the mice were sacrificed and tumor size was measured using calipers. Tumor volumes were calculated as follows: tumor volume (mm3) = 0.5 x length x width2.

Statistical analysis. Significance of differences was calculated using ANOVA with repeated measures using StatView 4.1 (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA). For graphical representation of data, Y-axis error bars indicate the SD of the data for each point on the graph. For antitumor data, the statistics were calculated based on the tumor sizes of each animal as opposed to the mean tumor volumes indicated by the heavy line. Evaluation of survival patterns was done by the Kaplan-Meier method and ranked according to the Mantel-Cox log-rank test using StatView 4.1 software package.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The combination of IL-2 and rF-TRICOM reduces tumor burden in an orthotopic RCC model. Because IL-2 is used as a therapy for RCC (8, 10, 16), we examined the antitumor effect of IL-2 and compared it with intratumoral rF-TRICOM (a recombinant fowlpox virus expressing the costimulatory molecules B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3) administration in an orthotopic model of RCC. In this model, 1 x 105 RCC#15 tumor cells were implanted under the capsule of the kidney of BALB/c mice, and mice were injected intratumorally on day 14 with PBS (Fig. 1A ) or rF-TRICOM admixed with rF-GM-CSF (referred to as rF-TRICOM/GM; Fig. 1B-D). Mice were injected i.p. with 16,000 IU recombinant human IL-2 given twice daily for 4 consecutive days (days 14-17; Fig. 1B and D). As shown in Fig. 1B, IL-2 moderately but significantly reduced tumor burden compared with the PBS control (P = 0.0008 and 0.0047, respectively), but no mice were cured of tumor. IL-2 therapy alone (Fig. 1B), however, was not as effective as rF-TRICOM/GM alone (P = 0.0117; Fig. 1C); moreover, 3 of 15 mice were cured of tumor using rF-TRICOM/GM alone. When IL-2 was added to intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration, there was a significant reduction in tumor burden compared with rF-TRICOM/GM alone (P = 0.0039), and 8 of 15 mice were found to be tumor-free compared with 3 of 15 mice in the rF-TRICOM/GM only group (compare Fig. 1D with Fig. 1C). From these data, we conclude that the addition of IL-2 to intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration contributes significantly to the reduction of tumor burden over that of intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration alone.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Effect of the addition of IL-2 on intratumoral rF-TRICOM antitumor efficacy. RCC#15 tumor cells were implanted under the capsule of the kidney. Fourteen days later, mice were given rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally. A, control mice were injected intratumorally with PBS on day 14. B, mice were injected i.p. with IL-2, the dose equivalent to that administered to patients (16,000 IU/dose), twice daily for 4 consecutive days (days 14-17). C, mice were given rF-TRICOM admixed with rF-GM-CSF (rF-TRICOM/GM) intratumorally on day 14. D, mice were given rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally on day 14. Concurrent with intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration, mice were injected i.p. with IL-2. Twenty-five days after tumor implantation, mice were sacrificed and tumor size was measured. Statistical significance was analyzed by including the tumor volume of each animal and not the mean tumor volume (heavy lines). Data are a compilation of two separate experiments.

 
Effect of the addition of rF-GM-CSF to intratumoral rF-TRICOM administration on orthotopic renal cell tumor growth. To determine the effect of rF-TRICOM administration versus that of the vector alone (devoid of TRICOM) on tumor burden, tumor cells were implanted as described in Fig. 1 and mice were injected intratumorally with PBS (data not shown), FP-WT (vector control; Fig. 2A and B ), or rF-TRICOM (Fig. 2C and D) 14 days after tumor implantation. Twenty-four days after tumor implantation, mice were sacrificed and tumor size was measured. Treatment of tumors with the FP-WT vector control did not reduce tumor burden in mice compared with the PBS control group (P = 0.6). However, treatment with rF-TRICOM significantly reduced tumor burden compared with the PBS control group (P = 0.02) or FP-WT treatment (P = 0.05; Fig. 2C).


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Effect of GM-CSF on antitumor efficacy of intratumoral treatment of orthotopic RCC tumors. RCC#15 tumor cells were implanted under the capsule of the kidney of BALB/c mice on day 0. Fourteen days after tumor implantation, mice were given FP-WT or rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally. A, mice were given FP-WT virus intratumorally. B, mice were given an admixture of FP-WT and rF-GM-CSF intratumorally. C, mice were given an admixture of rF-TRICOM and FP-WT intratumorally. D, mice were given an admixture of rF-TRICOM and rF-GM-CSF intratumorally. Twenty-four days after tumor implantation, mice were sacrificed and tumor size was measured. Statistical significance was analyzed by including the tumor volume of each animal and not the mean tumor volume (heavy lines).

 
To determine whether GM-CSF could increase antitumor efficacy in the RCC model, 1 x 107 pfu rF-GM-CSF was admixed with 1 x 108 pfu of either FP-WT or rF-TRICOM (Fig. 2B and D, respectively). When rF-GM-CSF was given with FP-WT, there was a significant decrease in tumor burden compared with FP-WT alone, although none of the mice were cured of tumor (Fig. 2B, P = 0.02, versus Fig. 2A). When rF-GM-CSF was admixed with rF-TRICOM, there was a significant decrease in tumor burden compared with rF-TRICOM admixed with FP-WT (Fig. 2D, P = 0.04, versus Fig. 2C); additionally, three of five mice were tumor-free after treatment with rF-TRICOM and rF-GM-CSF, whereas only one of five mice was tumor-free after treatment with rF-TRICOM and FP-WT. From these data, we conclude that intratumoral injection of RCC with rF-TRICOM is more effective than FP-WT at reducing tumor burden and that the addition of rF-GM-CSF further enhances this effect. This observation confirms and extends the earlier findings emphasizing the importance of GM-CSF in eliciting an antitumor response (31). Throughout the rest of this study, when mice received intratumoral injection of rF-TRICOM, it was admixed with 1 x 107 pfu rF-GM-CSF (rF-TRICOM/GM).

IL-2 treatment in combination with intratumoral rF-TRICOM administration decreases incidence of metastasis and extends survival in tumor-bearing mice. To determine whether combination treatment with systemic IL-2 and intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration could increase survival in tumor-bearing mice, RCC cells were implanted orthotopically as described above (day 0) and mice were given intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration on day 14 and/or treated with IL-2 on days 14 to 17. The mice were monitored for survival, and the primary tumor and metastases were observed at death. As shown in Fig. 3 , all mice treated with PBS or IL-2 alone had died by 70 days after tumor implantation. Mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM showed extended survival, with 3 of 10 mice surviving over 180 days after tumor implantation (P < 0.0001 versus PBS control). When IL-2 and rF-TRICOM/GM were combined, greater survival was observed, with 6 of 10 mice surviving over 180 days after tumor implantation (P < 0.0001 versus PBS control). In this experiment, survival in the rF-TRICOM/GM + IL-2 group was not increased significantly compared with rF-TRICOM/GM alone (P = 0.2565). However, the trend shows that extended survival is observed when IL-2 is added to intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration (6 of 10 mice survived past 180 days versus 3 of 10 mice when treated with rF-TRICOM/GM alone).


Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Effect on survival of intratumoral administration of rF-TRICOM admixed with rF-GM-CSF in combination with IL-2 treatment. RCC#15 tumor cells (1 x 105) were implanted under the capsule of the kidney, and mice were given rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally 14 d later. Thin line, control mice were injected intratumorally with PBS on day 14; thin dotted line, mice were injected i.p. with clinical dose IL-2 (16,000 IU/dose twice daily for 4 consecutive days); heavy line, mice were given rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally on day 14; heavy dotted line, mice were given rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally on day 14 and injected i.p. with clinical dose IL-2 (16,000 IU/dose IL-2 twice daily for 4 consecutive days). Mouse survival was monitored after the therapy, and the primary tumor and the tumor metastases were observed at death. (See Table 1).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Occurrence of metastasis at death

 
At the time of death, mice were analyzed for evidence of primary tumor and metastatic deposits. In PBS-treated mice, 60% of mice had lung metastases and 90% had metastasis to the mesenteric (draining) lymph node and 90% had ascites (Table 1 ). IL-2 treatment alone did not improve this profile, as 78% had lung metastases, 56% had mesenteric lymph node metastases, and 100% had ascites (P = 0.266 versus PBS control). Of the mice that did not survive in the groups treated with rF-TRICOM/GM alone, none showed metastasis to the lung, and only one of seven mice showed evidence of ascites and metastasis to the mesenteric lymph node (P < 0.0001 versus PBS control and IL-2 alone). Only four mice in the rF-TRICOM/GM + IL-2 therapy group did not survive, and of these mice, none showed evidence of ascites or metastasis to the lung and one of four showed metastasis to the mesenteric lymph node (25%; P < 0.0001 versus PBS and IL-2 alone; P = 0.8 versus rF-TRICOM alone). Of note, all mice examined at death had primary tumor on the kidney that was ≥500 mm3. Collectively, these data show that, whereas IL-2 therapy alone does not increase survival or reduce the incidence of metastasis in tumor-bearing mice, treatment with rF-TRICOM/GM both increases survival and reduces the incidence of metastasis and ascites in mice. Although not statistically significant, these data show an additive therapeutic effect of rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2, as mice in this group showed extended survival and reduction in the occurrence of metastasis compared with mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM alone.

Intratumoral rF-TRICOM administration and IL-2 therapy increase CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses. To determine whether intratumoral rF-TRICOM + IL-2 treatment increased the levels of tumor-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production in response to irradiated RCC#15 tumor were measured for both cell types. RCC tumor cells were implanted as described above, and 14 days after tumor implantation, mice were injected intratumorally with rF-TRICOM/GM and/or treated with IL-2. Fourteen days later (day 28 after tumor implantation), mice were sacrificed and spleen cells were used to assay proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production in both CD4+ and CD8+ populations. CD4+ T cells showed a significant increase in both cell proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production after treatment with IL-2 alone over PBS control (P = 0.0022; Fig. 4A and B ). Treatment with rF-TRICOM/GM alone showed a marked increase in both proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production over PBS control and IL-2 therapy alone (P = 0.0008 versus PBS control). When IL-2 was given with rF-TRICOM/GM, cell proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production slightly increased over that of rF-TRICOM/GM alone, and the increase seen in the cell proliferation assay was statistically significant (P = 0.0418). With regard to CD8+ cell proliferation, IL-2 therapy showed an increase over PBS control (P = 0.0597) and intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration showed a further increase (P = 0.0424; Fig. 4C). In mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2, there was a decrease in cell proliferation compared with rF-TRICOM/GM alone, although this decrease was not significant (P = 0.0948). IL-2, rF-TRICOM/GM, and rF-TRICOM/GM + IL-2 therapy resulted in an increase over that of the PBS control in the amount of IFN-{gamma} production from CD8+ T cells to similar levels (Fig. 4D). Taken together, these data show that, whereas treatment with rF-TRICOM/GM alone markedly increased the ability of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to proliferate and produce IFN-{gamma} in response to tumor, the addition of IL-2 to rF-TRICOM/GM did not further augment this effect.


Figure 4
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Enhancement of T-cell immune responses by intratumoral administration of rF-TRICOM. RCC#15 tumor cells (1 x 105) were implanted under the capsule of the kidney, and mice were given rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally 14 d later. Mice were given rF-TRICOM/GM and/or treated with clinical dose IL-2 (16,000 IU/dose twice daily for 4 consecutive days). Two weeks after intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration (28 d after tumor implantation), mice were sacrificed, spleens were harvested, and splenocytes were used for assays (n = 4, pooled). A, CD4+ cell proliferation. Purified CD4 cells were cultured with irradiated APCs and irradiated RCC#15 tumor cells for 5 d. [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/well) was added to the wells for the last 24 h, and proliferation was assayed by measuring incorporated radioactivity. Black columns, cell proliferation; white columns, medium control. B, IFN-{gamma} production from CD4+ cells. Purified CD4+ cells were cultured with irradiated RCC#15 tumor cells and APCs (responder to stimulant ratio, 20:1) for 5 d. The supernatant fluid was collected 72 h after culture and analyzed for IFN-{gamma}. Black columns, IFN-{gamma} production; gray columns, medium control. C, CD8+ cell proliferation. Purified CD8 cells were cultured with irradiated APCs and irradiated RCC#15 tumor cells for 5 d. [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/well) was added to the wells for the last 24 h, and proliferation was assayed by measuring incorporated radioactivity. Black columns, cell proliferation; white columns, medium control. D, IFN-{gamma} production from CD8+ cells. Purified CD8+ cells were cultured with irradiated RCC#15 tumor cells and APCs (responder to stimulant ratio, 20:1) for 5 d. The supernatant fluid was collected 72 h after culture and analyzed for IFN-{gamma}. Black columns, IFN-{gamma} production; gray columns, medium control.

 
Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the antitumor response induced by rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2. To determine the requirement of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells in the antitumor response after rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 treatment, BALB/c mice were implanted with RCC tumor cells as described above and treated with rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 on day 14 after implantation. On days 12, 13, and 14 after tumor implantation and once weekly thereafter for the duration of the experiment, mice were injected i.p. with either anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 antibodies to deplete their respective cell populations. Mice were sacrificed 24 days after tumor implantation and observed for the presence of tumors. As shown in Fig. 5B , 9 of 10 mice treated with PBS after rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 treatment were found to be tumor-free. Similarly, when treated with anti-CD4 antibody, 10 of 10 mice were tumor-free after rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 treatment, suggesting that CD4 cells may not be required for antitumor efficacy (Fig. 5C). However, when mice were treated with anti-CD8 antibody, only 2 of 10 mice were tumor-free and tumor burden was significantly increased over PBS treatment (Fig. 5D, P = 0.001, versus Fig. 5B). These data suggest that CD8+, but not CD4+, T cells play a role in the antitumor response seen during rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 treatment.


Figure 5
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Specific immune cell depletion from mice receiving intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM therapy in combination with IL-2 treatment. RCC#15 tumor cells (1 x 105) were implanted under the capsule of the kidney, and mice were given rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally 14 d later. At rF-TRICOM/GM administration, all mice were injected i.p. with clinical dose (CD) IL-2 (16,000 IU/dose twice daily for 4 consecutive days). A, control mice were injected with PBS intratumorally (i.t.) on day 14 and i.p. on days 14 to 17. B, mice that had been given intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration were treated i.p. with PBS during the therapy. C, mice that had been given intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration were treated i.p. with anti-CD4 antibody during the therapy. D, mice that had been given intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration were treated i.p. with anti-CD8 antibody during the therapy. All antibodies were given i.p. on days 12, 13, and 14 after tumor implantation and once weekly thereafter for the duration of the experiment. Twenty-five days after tumor implantation, mice were sacrificed and tumor size was measured. Statistical significance was analyzed by including the tumor volume of each animal and not the mean tumor volume (heavy lines).

 
rF-TRICOM/GM + IL-2 therapy enhances cross-presentation. gp70 has been identified as an antigen expressed on certain murine tumor cells that can be recognized by tumor-specific CTL (32). To determine whether treatment with rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 could amplify a gp70-specific CD8+ T-cell response, spleens were harvested 180 days after tumor implantation from mice cured of tumor after rF-TRICOM/GM ± IL-2 treatment (from the experiment shown in Fig. 3). It should be pointed out that mice treated with IL-2 alone were not available because none survived this therapy at day 180 (see Fig. 3) Splenic lymphocytes were stimulated for 6 days with the gp70 peptide (30), and cytokine production and CTL activity were assayed. CD8+ T cells from mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM alone showed no increase in IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha}, or IL-10 production above that of PBS-treated mice. However, CD8+ T cells from mice treated with both rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 showed an increase in antigen-specific IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-10 production (Fig. 6A ). No detectable levels of IL-6, IL-12, or MCP-1 were found in any samples.


Figure 6
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Amplification of gp70-specific CD8 T-cell immune responses by the addition of IL-2 to intratumoral administration of rF-TRICOM/GM. At 180 d after tumor implantation, mice from Fig. 3 that were cured of tumor were sacrificed and spleens were harvested (n = 3, pooled). The splenocytes were stimulated with gp70 peptide for 6 d before assays. To measure cytokine production, lymphocytes were restimulated with APCs and gp70 peptide for 24 h. Supernatant was collected and analyzed for IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha}. A, IFN-{gamma} production, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-10 production in response to gp70 peptide. Data as {Delta} pg/mL; cytokine production in response to the control peptide was subtracted from that induced by gp70 peptide. No detectable levels of IL-6, IL-12, or MCP-1 were found in any group. To assay CTL activity, lymphocytes were incubated for 5 h with 51Cr-labeled target (RCC#15, Renca, or CT26) cells and radioactivity in the supernatant was measured. B, CTL activity directed against RCC#15 tumor cells. C, CTL activity directed against Renca tumor cells. D, CTL activity directed against CT26 tumor cells. Points, mean of triplicate wells; bars, SD. {circ}, naive mice as a control; {blacksquare}, mice given rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally; {blacktriangleup}, mice given rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally in combination with IL-2 treatment.

 
To determine whether lymphocytes from mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 could kill the RCC tumor cells more effectively than lymphocytes from mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM alone, a CTL killing assay was done on RCC#15 tumor cells. Tumor cells were labeled with chromium-51 and incubated with lymphocytes previously stimulated with the gp70 peptide (as in Fig. 6A) for 5 h, and radioactivity in the supernatant was measured and percentage lysis was calculated as described in Materials and Methods. The most dramatic effect was seen when RCC#15 cells were incubated with lymphocytes from mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 and 80% to 90% lysis was seen (P = 0.0001 versus PBS control; Fig. 6B). By contrast, lysis by lymphocytes taken from mice treated with PBS or rF-TRICOM/GM alone was much lower, ranging from 0% to 15%, although the increase over control was significant at an E:T ratio of 80:1 (P = 0.0347). Immune responses were also analyzed against two additional tumor cell lines: Renca, a RCC line, and CT26, a biologically distinct murine colon carcinoma cell line. As shown in Fig. 6C, significantly more lysis of Renca tumor cells was seen with cells from rF-TRICOM/GM–treated mice than PBS-treated mice (P = 0.0353), and lymphocytes from mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 displayed ~50% lysis of Renca cells (P = 0.0001, compared with both control and rF-TRICOM/GM alone). When CT26 cells were used as targets, there was a significant increase in lysis by cells from mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM (up to 50% compared with 20% seen with control; P = 0.0008) and lymphocytes from rF-TRICOM/GM– and IL-2–treated mice lysed from 80% to 100% of the tumor cell targets (P = 0.0001, compared with both control and rF-TRICOM/GM alone; Fig. 6D). Taken together, these data show cross-presentation of antigen from destroyed tumor cells in that CD8+ T cells from mice cured of tumor by rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 produce much higher levels of IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-10 in response to a tumor-associated peptide (gp70) than cells from mice that received rF-TRICOM/GM treatment alone. In addition, CTLs from mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 kill gp70-positive tumor cells much more effectively than CTLs from mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM alone.

The combination of IL-15 and rF-TRICOM reduces tumor burden in an orthotopic RCC model. Although IL-2 has been approved for use in patients with metastatic RCC, it has been suggested that IL-2 is not optimal for inhibiting tumor growth because, in the presence of IL-2, CTL may recognize tumor as self and undergo activation-induced cell death or the immune response might be inhibited by IL-2–dependent regulatory T cells (Tregs; ref. 33). In contrast, IL-15 has been reported to activate T cells and natural killer cells, inhibit activation-induced cell death, and not support Tregs. It has been suggested that IL-15 could become a better choice than IL-2 for the treatment of RCC (3335). To determine whether IL-15 could increase antitumor efficacy in the RCC model, we examined the antitumor effect of IL-15 alone and in combination with intratumoral rF-TRICOM administration. Two modalities of IL-15 were tested: recombinant murine IL-15 (systemic) and vector-driven IL-15 via rF-IL-15 (intratumoral). BALB/c mice were implanted with RCC tumor cells as described above. When mice were treated intratumorally with rF-TRICOM/GM alone, there was a significant decrease in tumor burden compared with no treatment (Fig. 7B , P = 0.002, versus Fig. 7A); additionally, two of five mice were tumor-free. These results are similar to those depicted in Figs. 1C, 2C, and 5B. When recombinant murine IL-15 was administered systemically (i.p.), there was a reduction of tumor burden compared with mice receiving no treatment (Fig. 7C), although there were no tumor-free mice. The combination of systemic recombinant IL-15 with intratumoral vaccine resulted in a further reduction of tumor burden compared with no treatment (Fig. 7D, P = 0.001, versus Fig. 7A). When mice were treated with intratumoral rF-IL-15 alone, there was no decrease in tumor burden to mice receiving no treatment (Fig. 7E). However, the greatest antitumor activity was noted with the combination of rF-IL-15 with intratumoral vaccine, which resulted in marked reduction of tumor burden compared with no treatment (Fig. 7F, P < 0.001, versus Fig. 7A). There were no differences noted between mice treated with 107 or 108 pfu rF-IL-15; therefore, the data are presented together (Fig. 7F). More importantly, this combination treatment resulted in 80% of the mice being tumor-free (Fig. 7F, tumor incidence at day 25, P = 0.046, versus Fig. 7B). From these data, we conclude that intratumoral injection of RCC with rF-TRICOM/GM is effective at reducing tumor burden and that the addition of rIL-15 further enhances this effect.


Figure 7
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Effect of the addition of IL-15 on intratumoral rF-TRICOM antitumor efficacy. RCC#15 tumor cells were implanted under the capsule of the kidney. A, control mice were injected intratumorally with PBS on day 14. B, mice were given rF-TRICOM admixed with rF-GM-CSF (rF-TRICOM/GM) intratumorally on day 14. C, mice were injected i.p. with recombinant murine IL-15 (rIL-15; 5 µg/dose) twice daily for 3 consecutive days (days 14-16). Mice were given rF-TRICOM admixed with rF-GM-CSF (rF-TRICOM/GM) intratumorally on day 14. D, mice were given rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally on day 14. Concurrent with intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration, mice were injected i.p. with recombinant IL-15. E, mice were given rF-IL-15 intratumorally on day 14. F, mice were given rF-TRICOM/GM intratumorally on day 14. Concurrent with intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration, mice were injected intratumorally with rF-IL-15. Twenty-five days after tumor implantation, mice were sacrificed and tumor size was measured. Statistical significance was analyzed by including the tumor volume of each animal. Asterisk, statistical significance based on tumor incidence at day 25.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IL-2 is currently used for RCC therapy. However, along with the potential benefits of this therapy are significant toxicities that also limit patient eligibility to those who can withstand these toxicities. Several clinical trials have shown the safety and provided evidence of clinical activity of recombinant TRICOM vectors injected s.c. or s.c./intratumoral; these include rF-CEA-TRICOM (36), rF-CEA-MUC1-TRICOM (37), and rF-PSA-TRICOM (38). In addition, intratumoral rV-TRICOM administration in patients with melanoma showed safety and evidence of clinical activity (27). These studies have also provided evidence of the potential clinical benefit of adding GM-CSF to TRICOM therapy (36). An ongoing clinical trial is also showing the safety and feasibility of intraprostatic administration of rF-PSA-TRICOM in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Here, we sought to determine whether the combination of rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 could reduce tumor burden in mice more effectively than either therapy alone. The data presented here show that the combination of rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 not only is more effective at reducing primary tumor burden and distal metastases in mice than either therapy alone but also induces greater T-cell responses to tumor and increases cross-presentation of tumor antigen.

We chose to use a streptozotocin-induced renal cancer cell line of BALB/c mice (RCC#15) in our studies (18). Although many of the renal cancer cell lines available exhibit rapid growth in mice, the RCC#15 cell line grows more slowly, simulating tumor growth in humans more accurately. In addition, these tumors grow orthotopically under the capsule of the kidney and spontaneously metastasize to the lymph nodes and lungs (Table 1), further mimicking the disease seen in humans (18). It is important to note that, although the orthotopic model used here more accurately simulates tumor growth in humans than other renal cancer cell lines, pathology shows that these cells are not clear cell renal carcinoma. Additionally, it is important to state that no mutations were found in exons 1, 2, or 3 of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene or in codons 12, 13, and 61 of the Ras oncogene, the sites of most frequent Ras mutations.

In a preclinical study to determine which of the 10 cytokines expressed by irradiated tumor cells elicited the most potent antitumor immunity, a vaccine consisting of irradiated tumor cells expressing GM-CSF was the only therapy that protected against tumor challenge (39). In a phase I clinical trial in patients with metastatic RCC, vaccination with autologous tumor cells expressing GM-CSF showed infiltration of dendritic cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and T cells at the vaccination site (40). These studies and others provided the rationale to administer rF-TRICOM and rF-GM-CSF intratumorally. This way, GM-CSF and the costimulatory molecules present in rF-TRICOM would be presented directly into the tumor milieu, exploiting the presence of multiple tumor antigens and acting de facto, as a whole tumor cell immunogen in situ. We and others have previously shown that rF-GM-CSF enhances T-cell responses and antitumor activity when given as an admixture with CEA/TRICOM vectors (28, 41, 42), and when mice were vaccinated intratumorally, the omission of rF-GM-CSF dramatically reduced the antitumor effects induced by the vaccine regimen (43). This study confirmed these previous findings, as mice given rF-GM-CSF showed significantly reduced tumor burden compared with mice that did not receive rF-GM-CSF (Fig. 2).

Because of the toxicity of high-dose IL-2 in humans, a clinical trial was done comparing toxicity and antitumor efficacy of high-dose IL-2 and low-dose IL-2 (one tenth that given with high-dose IL-2). Whereas toxicity was reduced with low-dose IL-2, the response rate, durability, and survival in complete responders were lower than that seen with high-dose IL-2 (16). However, there was no difference in overall survival between the high-dose and low-dose groups. In this study, we compared the efficacy of IL-2 or vaccine alone to the combination of the two modalities. As shown in Fig. 1, IL-2 given with rF-TRICOM/GM resulted in a significantly lower tumor burden and more tumor-free mice than either therapy alone, showing that intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration and IL-2 therapy have a synergistic effect on reducing tumor burden.

Extended survival was observed in mice receiving rF-TRICOM/GM, and although the addition of IL-2 to rF-TRICOM/GM resulted in a larger number of mice surviving past 180 days (30% with rF-TRICOM/GM versus 60% with rF-TRICOM/GM + IL-2; Fig. 3), this difference was not significant. Similarly, the incidence of metastasis at death was significantly less in mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM ± IL-2 compared with PBS or IL-2 alone, but the combination of rF-TRICOM/GM and IL-2 did not significantly reduce the incidence of metastasis compared with rF-TRICOM/GM alone (Table 1). Although the differences between rF-TRICOM/GM with or without IL-2 were not statistically significant, the trends favored the addition of IL-2 to rF-TRICOM/GM in both survival and presence of metastases. Additionally, combination therapy was shown to be superior to rF-TRICOM/GM alone when immune responses to the endogenous antigen gp70 were tested (Fig. 6).

When examining the T-cell response to the various therapies used, it was interesting to observe that, although reduction in tumor burden and mouse survival was increased when IL-2 was added to rF-TRICOM/GM, the addition of IL-2 did not result in an increase in either the proliferation or IFN-{gamma} production by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4). It has previously been shown that the avidity of T cells plays an important role in antitumor and antiviral responses (44, 45). We have found that vaccination with rV-TRICOM and rF-GM-CSF greatly enhances the avidity of T cells produced in both foreign and self-antigen systems (46). In addition, we have found that the addition of a recombinant fowlpox virus expressing IL-2 (rF-IL2) to rV-CEA/TRICOM + rF-GM-CSF enhances the avidity of carcinoembryonic antigen and gp70-specific T cells compared with vaccination without rF-IL2.3 Therefore, although the quantity of the T-cell response did not increase when IL-2 was added, it is possible that the quality (avidity) was greatly increased, resulting in a greater and longer-lived antitumor response. Future studies will include a systematic examination of the effect of rF-TRICOM/GM + recombinant human IL-2 on T-cell avidity.

We have previously shown that CD4+ and CD8+ T cells play a role in the antitumor effect of CEA/TRICOM + rF-GM-CSF and IL-2 in a s.c. self-antigen tumor model (47). To determine which cell population was responsible for the antitumor effect seen with rF-TRICOM/GM + IL-2 in an orthotopic RCC model, we depleted the CD4+ or CD8+ cell populations during intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration and observed the effect on tumor growth. Whereas the depletion of CD4+ T cells had no effect on the reduction of tumor burden, the depletion of CD8+ T cells significantly reduced the number of tumor-free mice, and average tumor burden was higher than when these cells were not depleted (Fig. 5). Although the mechanism for the antitumor efficacy of IL-2 is not fully elucidated, this effect is thought to be mediated through activated T cells and natural killer cells (8), which is consistent with our results. However, the antibody that we used to deplete CD4 cells would also deplete CD4+/CD25+ cells or Tregs. It is possible that, by depleting these Tregs, the immune response was augmented against the tumor. It has been shown that depleting Tregs while giving a vaccine consisting of a B7.1 fusion protein suppressed tumor growth to a greater extent than that seen with either modality alone (48). Additionally, i.v. administration of the Treg-depleting drug Ontak (Ligand Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA) before vaccination with RCC RNA-transfected dendritic cells enhanced antitumor immunity (49). Previous work in our laboratory, depleting Tregs along with giving vaccine, has shown that, although the combination of depleting Tregs and giving vaccine increased immune responses compared with vaccine alone, this combination did not augment antitumor efficacy (50). Therefore, although it is a possibility that the depletion of Tregs contributed to the antitumor efficacy seen in Fig. 5C, it is unlikely that this accounts for the whole effect and still suggests a role for CD8+ cells.

Previously, there was not a well-established tumor-associated antigen for murine RCC (25). Therefore, we hypothesized that direct introduction of immunostimulatory molecules into the tumor milieu by intratumoral administration of rF-TRICOM/GM would exploit multiple tumor antigens that would then induce and potentiate tumor-specific immune responses. By PCR analysis, we found that the RCC#15 tumor cell line used in these studies expressed gp70 (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 6, CD8+ T cells from mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM + IL-2 produced significantly higher levels of IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-10 in response to stimulation with gp70 peptide than T cells from mice treated with rF-TRICOM/GM alone. Furthermore, these CD8+ T cells could mediate lysis not only of the original RCC line but also from another RCC line, Renca, and an unrelated tumor cell line, CT26. These data show that intratumoral rF-TRICOM administration can induce immune responses to an endogenous tumor antigen and suggest that intratumoral rF-TRICOM administration can be used to induce antitumor T-cell responses in cancers where the tumor antigens are largely unknown. We have previously shown that vaccinating intratumorally can induce immune responses to antigens not given in the vaccine (antigen cascade; ref. 50). The data in Fig. 6 support the idea that, in the clinic, TRICOM vectors could be given intratumorally in the primary tumor (as an adjuvant to surgery, or administered laparoscopically), and immune responses would be generated against other tumor antigens. This phenomenon of antigen cascade could aid in the elimination of distant metastases as well as the primary tumor.

In the past year, two new drugs have been approved for use in metastatic RCC. Both sunitinib (Sutent, Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, MA) and sorafenib (Nexavar, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, West Haven, CT) are tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting platelet-derived growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, among other kinases (51). Sunitinib was approved for use in metastatic RCC in January 2006 after a phase III trial showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival and objective response rate over that seen with IFN-{alpha} (52). A phase III trial showed an increase in progression-free survival and median overall survival in advanced RCC patients treated with sorafenib compared with placebo (53, 54), and consequently, the drug was granted fast-track Food and Drug Administration approval in December 2005. Although the approval of these two drugs is a great advance in therapy for RCC, tyrosine kinase inhibitors have several disadvantages, including the ability of a tumor cell to redirect signals through other pathways or mutate the tyrosine kinase in question, becoming resistant to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (51). It has been shown that, when tyrosine kinase inhibitors are combined with chemotherapy or radiation, synergistic antitumor effects are seen (5558). In light of this, and because clinical trials with TRICOM vectors in RCC may now be conducted in patients who have failed sorafenib or sunitinib, future studies examining the combination of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors with vaccine and IL-2 therapy may need to be conducted.

The antitumor effect of IL-2 most likely results from its ability to expand T-cell populations and increase the activity of these populations. However, it has recently been suggested that IL-2 is not optimal for inhibiting tumor growth because, in the presence of IL-2, CTL may recognize tumor as self and undergo activation-induced cell death or the immune response might be inhibited by IL-2–dependent Tregs (33). In contrast, IL-15 has been reported to activate T cells and natural killer cells, inhibit activation-induced cell death, and not support Tregs. IL-15 could become a better choice than IL-2 for the treatment of RCC (3335). As shown in Fig. 7, tumor-bearing mice treated systemically with recombinant IL-15 had a significant reduction in tumor burden (Fig. 7C). These data are similar to that of Kobayashi et al. (59) who described IL-15 preventing experimental MC38 pulmonary metastases in IL-15 transgenic mice that had large quantities of IL-15 in their serum. The addition of systemic IL-15 to intratumoral vaccine resulted in more mice being tumor-free by day 25 (0 of 5 versus 3 of 5; Fig. 7C and D). Local IL-15 delivered to the tumor by intratumoral rF-IL-15 did not result in a significant reduction in tumor burden. However, rF-IL-15, given concurrently with vaccine, resulted in the greatest antitumor activity, with substantially more tumor-free mice than vaccine alone or rF-IL-15 alone, showing that intratumoral rF-TRICOM/GM administration and IL-15 therapy have a synergistic effect on reducing tumor burden. The use of IL-15 in combination with vaccine will be further explored and compared with IL-12 in terms of toxicity and T-cell maintenance.

Taken together, our data show that rF-TRICOM/GM effectively reduces RCC tumor burden in mice when given alone and show a synergistic effect when given with standard of care IL-2. These data suggest that rF-TRICOM/GM could be given to renal cell cancer patients alone or in addition to IL-2 to induce antitumor immune responses and reduce tumor burden with minimal toxicity.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Marion Taylor for excellent technical assistance, Drs. Helen Sabzevari and Sven Mostbock for critical review and comments, and Debra Weingarten for editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
Grant support: Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

3 Unpublished data. Back

Received 9/28/06; revised 12/27/06; accepted 12/29/06.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:10–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Elson PJ, Witte RS, Trump DL. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 1988;48:7310–3.
  3. Glaspy JA. Therapeutic options in the management of renal cell carcinoma. Semin Oncol 2002;29:41–6.[Medline]
  4. Sanchez-Ortiz RF, Tannir N, Ahrar K, Wood CG. Spontaneous regression of pulmonary metastases from renal cell carcinoma after radio frequency ablation of primary tumor: an in situ tumor vaccine? J Urol 2003;170:178–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Vogelzang NJ, Priest ER, Borden L. Spontaneous regression of histologically proved pulmonary metastases from renal cell carcinoma: a case with 5-year followup. J Urol 1992;148:1247–8.[Medline]
  6. Bleumer I, Oosterwijk E, De Mulder P, Mulders PF. Immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2003;44:65–75.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Jacobsohn KM, Wood CG. Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma. Semin Oncol 2006;33:576–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. McDermott DF, Atkins MB. Application of IL-2 and other cytokines in renal cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2004;4:455–68.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. McDermott DF, Atkins MB. Interleukin-2 therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma—predictors of response. Semin Oncol 2006;33:583–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Atkins MB, Regan M, McDermott D. Update on the role of interleukin 2 and other cytokines in the treatment of patients with stage IV renal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:6342–6S.
  11. Wigginton JM, Komschlies KL, Back TC, et al. Administration of interleukin 12 with pulse interleukin 2 and the rapid and complete eradication of murine renal carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:38–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Murphy WJ, Welniak L, Back T, et al. Synergistic anti-tumor responses after administration of agonistic antibodies to CD40 and IL-2: coordination of dendritic and CD8+ cell responses. J Immunol 2003;170:2727–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wiltrout RH, Gregorio TA, Fenton RG, et al. Cellular and molecular studies in the treatment of murine renal cancer. Semin Oncol 1995;22:9–16.[Medline]
  14. Fyfe G, Fisher RI, Rosenberg SA, et al. Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:688–96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Topalian SL, et al. Treatment of 283 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell cancer using high-dose bolus interleukin 2. JAMA 1994;271:907–13.[Abstract]
  16. Yang JC, Sherry RM, Steinberg SM, et al. Randomized study of high-dose and low-dose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic renal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3127–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Delahunt B, Wakefield JS. Ultrastructure of streptozotocin-induced renal tumours in mice. Virchows Arch 1997;430:173–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Gruys ME, Back TC, Subleski J, et al. Induction of transplantable mouse renal cell cancers by streptozotocin: in vivo growth, metastases, and angiogenic phenotype. Cancer Res 2001;61:6255–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Frankenberger B, Pohla H, Noessner E, et al. Influence of CD80, interleukin-2, and interleukin-7 expression in human renal cell carcinoma on the expansion, function, and survival of tumor-specific CTLs. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:1733–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Antonia SJ, Seigne J, Diaz J, et al. Phase I trial of a B7-1 (CD80) gene modified autologous tumor cell vaccine in combination with systemic interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2002;167:1995–2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Shimizu J, Yamazaki S, Sakaguchi S. Induction of tumor immunity by removing CD25+CD4+ T cells: a common basis between tumor immunity and autoimmunity. J Immunol 1999;163:5211–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hodge JW, Greiner JW, Tsang KY, et al. Costimulatory molecules as adjuvants for immunotherapy. Front Biosci 2006;11:788–803.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Hodge JW, Sabzevari H, Yafal AG, et al. A triad of costimulatory molecules synergize to amplify T-cell activation. Cancer Res 1999;59:5800–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Slavin-Chiorini DC, Catalfamo M, Kudo-Saito C, et al. Amplification of the lytic potential of effector/memory CD8+ cells by vector-based enhancement of ICAM-1 (CD54) in target cells: implications for intratumoral vaccine therapy. Cancer Gene Ther 2004;11:665–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Panelli MC, Wang E, Marincola FM. The pathway to biomarker discovery: carbonic anhydrase IX and the prediction of immune responsiveness. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:3601–3.[Free Full Text]
  26. Vieweg J, Jackson A. Antigenic targets for renal cell carcinoma immunotherapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2004;4:1791–801.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Kaufman HL. Manipulating the local tumor microenvironment with poxviruses expressing costimulatory molecules. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1062:41–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kass E, Panicali DL, Mazzara G, Schlom J, Greiner JW. Granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor produced by recombinant avian poxviruses enriches the regional lymph nodes with antigen-presenting cells and acts as an immunoadjuvant. Cancer Res 2001;61:206–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. McLaughlin JP, Schlom J, Kantor JA, Greiner JW. Improved immunotherapy of a recombinant carcinoembryonic antigen vaccinia vaccine when given in combination with interleukin-2. Cancer Res 1996;56:2361–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Rosato A, Santa SD, Zoso A, et al. The cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response against a poorly immunogenic mammary adenocarcinoma is focused on a single immunodominant class I epitope derived from the gp70 Env product of an endogenous retrovirus. Cancer Res 2003;63:2158–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kass E, Parker J, Schlom J, Greiner JW. Comparative studies of the effects of recombinant GM-CSF and GM-CSF administered via a poxvirus to enhance the concentration of antigen-presenting cells in regional lymph nodes. Cytokine 2000;12:960–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Huang AY, Gulden PH, Woods AS, et al. The immunodominant major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted antigen of a murine colon tumor derives from an endogenous retroviral gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:9730–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Waldmann TA. The biology of interleukin-2 and interleukin-15: implications for cancer therapy and vaccine design. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6:595–601.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Fehniger TA, Cooper MA, Caligiuri MA. Interleukin-2 and interleukin-15: immunotherapy for cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2002;13:169–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Waldmann TA, Dubois S, Tagaya Y. Contrasting roles of IL-2 and IL-15 in the life and death of lymphocytes: implications for immunotherapy. Immunity 2001;14:105–10.[Medline]
  36. Marshall JL, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, et al. Phase I study of sequential vaccinations with fowlpox-CEA(6D)-TRICOM alone and sequentially with vaccinia-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, with and without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, in patients with carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:720–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Gulley J, Arlen P, Dahut W. A pilot study of a PANVAC-V and PANVAC-F in patients (pts) with metastatic carcinoma [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2006.
  38. Arlen P, Gulley J, Dahut W. A phase 1 study of sequential vaccinations with recombinant fowlpox-PSA (L155)-TRICOM (rF) alone, or in combination with recombinant vaccinia-PSA (L155) (rV); and the role of GM-CSF in patients (pts) with prostate cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2004;23:2522a.
  39. Dranoff G, Jaffee E, Lazenby A, et al. Vaccination with irradiated tumor cells engineered to secrete murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates potent, specific, and long-lasting anti-tumor immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:3539–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Simons JW, Jaffee EM, Weber CE, et al. Bioactivity of autologous irradiated renal cell carcinoma vaccines generated by ex vivo granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene transfer. Cancer Res 1997;57:1537–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Grosenbach DW, Barrientos JC, Schlom J, Hodge JW. Synergy of vaccine strategies to amplify antigen-specific immune responses and antitumor effects. Cancer Res 2001;61:4497–505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Aarts WM, Schlom J, Hodge JW. Vector-based vaccine/cytokine combination therapy to enhance induction of immune responses to a self-antigen and antitumor activity. Cancer Res 2002;62:5770–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Kudo-Saito C, Schlom J, Hodge JW. Intratumoral vaccination and diversified subcutaneous/intratumoral vaccination with recombinant poxviruses encoding a tumor antigen and multiple costimulatory molecules. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:1090–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. McKee MD, Roszkowski JJ, Nishimura MI. T cell avidity and tumor recognition: implications and therapeutic strategies. J Transl Med 2005;3:35.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Alexander-Miller MA, Leggatt GR, Berzofsky JA. Selective expansion of high- or low-avidity cytotoxic T lymphocytes and efficacy for adoptive immunotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:4102–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Hodge JW, Chakraborty M, Kudo-Saito C, Garnett CT, Schlom J. Multiple costimulatory modalities enhance CTL avidity. J Immunol 2005;174:5994–6004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Hodge JW, Grosenbach DW, Aarts WM, Poole DJ, Schlom J. Vaccine therapy of established tumors in the absence of autoimmunity. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:1837–49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Liu A, Hu P, Khawli LA, Epstein AL. Combination B7-Fc fusion protein treatment and Treg cell depletion therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:8492–502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Dannull J, Su Z, Rizzieri D, et al. Enhancement of vaccine-mediated antitumor immunity in cancer patients after depletion of regulatory T cells. J Clin Invest 2005;115:3623–33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Kudo-Saito C, Schlom J, Hodge JW. Induction of an antigen cascade by diversified subcutaneous/intratumoral vaccination is associated with antitumor responses. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:2416–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Steeghs N, Nortier JW, Gelderblom H. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of solid tumors: an update of recent developments. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:942–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Motzer R, Hutson T, Tomczak P, et al. Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib malate (SU11248) versus interferon-alfa (IFN-a) as first-line systemic therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Am Soc Clin Oncol Annu Meet 2006. p. 24.
  53. Escudier B, Szczylic C, Eisen T, et al. Randomized phase III trial of the Raf kinase and VEGFR inhibitor sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Am Soc Clin Oncol Annu Meet 2005. p. 23.
  54. Eisen T, Bukowski R, Staehler M, et al. Randomized phase II trial of sorafenib in advanced renal cell