Clinical Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 13, 2614-2620, May 1, 2007. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1187
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kader, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kader, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, X.

Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Matrix Metalloproteinase Polymorphisms Are Associated with Bladder Cancer Invasiveness

A. Karim Kader1,2, Jun Liu1, Lina Shao1, Colin P. Dinney2, Jie Lin1, Yunfei Wang1, Jian Gu1, H. Barton Grossman2 and Xifeng Wu1

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Epidemiology and 2 Urology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Requests for reprints: Xifeng Wu, Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1340, 1155 Pressler Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail: xwu{at}mdanderson.org.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) promote tumor invasion and alter microenvironment. MMP levels are elevated in bladder cancer patients correlating with more advanced stage. We tested whether polymorphisms in MMP genes modify the risk of bladder cancer invasiveness and whether smoke exposure modifies this risk.

Experimental Design: Using a case-only study, we examined the association of 11 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and one microsatellite polymorphism in MMP genes MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, MMP8, MMP9, and MMP12 with the risk of invasive bladder cancer in 243 Caucasian patients with muscle invasive compared with 315 Caucasian patients with superficial disease.

Results: The MMP9 microsatellite ≥24 CA repeat and MMP12 –82 G alleles were associated with a higher risk of bladder cancer invasiveness [odds ratio (OR), 3.10; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.17-8.23 and OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.00-2.28, respectively]. Ever smokers with the MMP9 ≥24 CA repeat allele had a 5.16-fold (95% CI, 1.56-17.1) increased risk of invasiveness compared with wild-type never smokers. Ever smokers with the MMP12 G allele also had an increased risk of bladder cancer invasiveness (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.30-4.12).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that genetic changes in MMPs are associated with the development of invasive bladder cancer.


Bladder cancer is the second most common urologic malignancy, with 61,000 new cases and 13,000 deaths from bladder cancer expected in 2006 in the United States alone (1). Seventy-five percent of patients with bladder cancer present with superficial disease that is confined to the urothelium and lamina propria, the remaining 25% present with muscle-invasive disease. Furthermore, disease recurs in up to 80% of the patients with originally superficial disease, but in 20% of these recurrences, this consists of muscle invasive disease that is associated with a heightened risk of metastases and death. Despite the fact that superficial disease can progress to muscle-invasive disease, the vast majority of cases of muscle-invasive disease are found at initial presentation in patients with bladder cancer (2). In keeping with this, there is growing evidence of the divergent biology that exists between the invasive and superficial forms of the disease (3, 4).

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are a family of zinc-dependent enzymes that are considered to have an important cellular regulatory function by degrading the surrounding stroma, cytokines, and even membrane-bound receptors. Because of their diverse effects on the cellular microenvironment, MMPs are believed to play a substantial role in the development of a variety of inflammatory, neurodegenerative, and malignant diseases (59). They may foster cancer development by stimulating cellular proliferation, promoting angiogenesis, or promoting invasion and metastases (8, 10). Not surprisingly, therefore, elevated levels of MMPs have been detected in the serum and urine of patients with many different types of cancer, including cancer of the bladder, breast, lung, colon, and head and neck as well as melanoma (11). Because of the high levels of MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, and MMP9 in the urine, it is believed that they may have a role in the pathogenesis of bladder cancer and have also been advocated as tumor markers (12, 13).

Polymorphisms represent natural variations of the genetic code in the population. The most common polymorphisms are single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). Other more rare polymorphisms, such as microsatellite repeats, may also have functional consequences (14). Polymorphisms in the promoter region of a gene, such as the 2G allele of MMP1 –1607, the G allele of MMP2 –1575, the 5A allele of MMP3 –1612, the –1562 T and the ≥24 CA repeat alleles of MMP9, and the A allele of the MMP12 –82, examined in this analysis can lead to increased gene expression (15). SNPs in the coding region may lead to an amino acid change that may alter protein function. It must however be recognized that the functional significance of these genetic variations may differ depending on the organ system studied. Regardless, given their potential role on expression and phenotype, polymorphisms may account for the differences seen in susceptibility to and the outcome from a given disease (16).

Smoking is the most significant risk factor for the development of bladder cancer, with smokers having three times the risk of bladder cancer compared with nonsmokers (17). This risk is greatest for patients with advanced stage, invasive disease (18). Despite this, not all smokers go on to develop bladder cancer. Therefore, there may be genetic factors that predispose some smokers to be at heightened risk for the development of invasive bladder cancer.

Associations between MMP polymorphisms and cancer risk have been found in the setting of a variety of different tumors, including melanoma and breast, ovarian, lung, and colorectal tumors (1923). To our knowledge, however, an association between any of the MMP polymorphisms with the risk of bladder cancer invasiveness has not been explored.

In this study, we used a candidate gene approach to perform an analysis to identify the possible association of 12 polymorphisms in six different MMPs with the risk of invasive compared with superficial bladder cancer and to investigate the possible modulating effect of smoking on these associations.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study population. The bladder cancer patients in this analysis were enrolled from an on-going case-control study of bladder cancer, which started patient recruitment in 1999. All enrolled patients were incident cases of histologically confirmed invasive or superficial bladder cancer and were recruited from the urology and genitourinary clinics at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and The Scott Department of Urology at The Baylor College of Medicine. The vast majority of patients are from Houston, Texas and its seven surrounding counties and were referred to M. D. Anderson by local physicians. As M. D. Anderson is a large referral center, local physicians tend to refer advanced cases, and thus, advanced cases are highly represented in this study population. The participation rate was ~92%, and blood samples were available for all subjects. Ethnicity was based on self-report and categorized as Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, Asian, Native Indian, and other. However, as 90% of the patients were Caucasians, this study was limited to this population.

Trained M. D. Anderson staff interviewers administered an epidemiologic questionnaire to study participants to collect data on demographic characteristics, smoking history, occupation history, and other lifestyle factors. At the end of the interview, a 40-mL blood sample was drawn into coded tubes. All patients provided written informed consent. The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and The Baylor College of Medicine institutional review boards approved the protocol.

Genotyping. Genomic DNA was first isolated from peripheral blood lymphocytes by proteinase K digestion followed by isopropanol extraction and ethanol precipitation; the sample was then coded and genotyped. All of the polymorphisms, except for the MMP9 –1562 and the MMP9 microsatellite polymorphisms, were determined using Taqman real-time PCR. The primer and probe sequences were either obtained from the National Cancer Institute's SNP500 database or designed using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems) and can be found in Supplementary Table S1. The probes were labeled fluorescently with either FAM or VIC on the 5' end and a nonfluorescent minor groove binder quencher on the 3' end (Applied Biosystems). Typical amplification mixes (5 µL) contained sample DNA (5 ng), 1x Taqman buffer A, 200 µmol/L deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 5 mmol MgCl2, 0.65 unit of AmpliTaq Gold, 900 nmol/L each primer, and 200 nmol/L each probe. The thermal cycling conditions consisted of one cycle for 10 min at 95°C, 40 cycles for 15 s at 95°C, and one cycle for 1 min at 60°C. SDS version 2.1 software (Applied Biosystems) was used to analyze end-point fluorescence. In our laboratory, strict quality control procedures are implemented to ensure high genotyping accuracy. A water control, internal controls, and previously genotyped samples were included in each plate with 100% concordance. Genotyping for MMP9 –1562 was done as described previously using PCR-RFLP (19). The MMP9 microsatellite polymorphism was genotyped using capillary electrophoresis of PCR-amplified products done using a 6-FAM fluoresceinated forward-labeled primer, as described by Fiotti et al. (24).

Statistical analyses. A {chi}2 analysis was used to assess patient characteristics by genotype. The Student's t test (two sided) was used to test for differences between the different groups for continuous variables. Unconditional logistical regression analysis was performed to assess the risk associated with the various polymorphisms. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated as an estimate of relative risk. All reported ORs were adjusted for age, sex, and smoking status. For the smoking-stratified analyses, subjects who had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetimes were defined as ever smokers. Participants who had quit smoking at least 1 year before the study began were categorized as former smokers.

For the MMP9 microsatellite data, the allele was dichotomized, such that <24 CA repeats were considered to indicate the wild-type allele, and ≥24 CA repeats were considered to indicate the variant allele. Combined analysis was done on polymorphisms that in our previous studies were shown to have relatively low linkage (D' < 0.6). Groups were divided into tertiles based on the number of patients in the nonstratified group. Individuals with less than three alleles were used as the reference group, and the two test groups consisted of individuals with four to five alleles and individuals with more than six alleles. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done where appropriate to control for possible confounders by age, sex, and smoking status. Statistical analysis was done using Stata v8.0 software (Stata Corp.).

Regarding statistical power, our study had sufficient power to detect the main effect. Given the variant genotype frequencies, the sample size and, the ratio of invasive to superficial patients, the power to detect an OR of 2.0 reached 0.79 to 0.98 for main effect of MMP SNPs (except MMP9 A2V).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Characteristics of subjects. The characteristics of the study subjects are summarized in Table 1 . Briefly, study subjects consisted of 243 Caucasian patients with invasive bladder cancer and 315 Caucasian patients with superficial bladder cancer. A similar breakdown of men and women (~76 ± 1% men and 23 ± 1% women) was noted between the two groups (P = 0.80 and 0.70 for invasive and superficial disease, respectively). Age in patients with invasive and superficial disease was also similar (mean, 64.7 and 63.6 years, respectively; P = 0.23). In contrast, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to smoking status, in that there was a higher percentage of never smokers among the patients with superficial disease (29.8% versus 21.4%), and that there was a higher percentage of ever smokers among the patients with invasive disease (78.6% versus 70.2%; P = 0.02).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Selected characteristics of study participants who provided blood samples for genotyping

 
Genotypes and invasive bladder cancer risk. Table 2 summarizes the association of the various polymorphisms on the risk of invasive as opposed to superficial bladder cancer. The ≥24 CA repeat allele of the MMP9 microsatellite polymorphism was associated with a 3-fold higher risk of invasiveness [OR, 3.10; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.17-8.23]. A similar association was seen for the G allele of the MMP12 –82 SNP, with an increased risk for the AG genotype (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.90-2.12), and GG genotype (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 0.97-23.90; Ptrend = 0.022) and the GA + GG combination (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.00-2.28).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Comparison of MMP genotype in muscle-invasive versus superficial bladder cancer patients

 
Joint effects of smoking and MMP polymorphisms. We examined the joint effect of smoking and MMP polymorphisms (Table 3 ). Significant joint effects between smoking and MMP9 mircrosatellite and MMP12 –82 genotypes were observed. Compared with never smoker with the <24 repeat allele of the MMP9 microsatellite polymorphism, smokers with ≥24 CA repeat allele were at 5.16-fold increased risk of invasiveness (95% CI, 1.56-17.1). Furthermore, ever smokers with the G allele of the MMP12 –82 SNP had a 2.32-fold increased risk of invasiveness (95% CI, 1.30-4.12) compared with never smokers with the A allele. However, none of the interaction tests done were statistically significant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Joint effect of genotype and smoking status on muscle-invasive versus superficial bladder cancer risk

 
Effect of smoke stratification on associations. Smoking-stratified analysis showed significant effects only in former smokers (Supplementary Table S2). The following alleles had a protective effect on bladder cancer invasiveness risk in former smokers: the 2G allele of the MMP1 –1607 SNP (2G2G genotype: OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-0.98; Ptrend = 0.044), the 5A allele of the MMP3 –1612 SNP (5A5A genotype: OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.96; Ptrend = 0.037), and the A allele of the MMP 8 K87E SNP (AA and GA genotype combination: OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.98). In combined analysis, the protective effect increased with an increasing number of alleles (Supplementary Table S3). That is, those with four to five alleles had a 46% lower risk of invasive disease compared with patients with superficial cases (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.27-1.07), whereas those with more than six alleles had a 64% lower risk (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.72; Ptrend = 0.003).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To our knowledge, this is the first study examining MMP polymorphisms and their association with the risk of invasive bladder cancer. In this study, the MMP12 –82 SNP and MMP9 microsatellite polymorphism were associated with an increased risk of invasive bladder cancer compared with superficial bladder cancer particularly when coupled with smoking exposure. We further observed that certain MMP alleles alone and in combination might be associated with a protective effect against invasive bladder cancer in former smokers. This contributes to a growing body of literature suggesting that the biology of invasive and superficial bladder cancer is different (3, 4).

MMPs are a class of proteases that are believed to contribute significantly and uniquely to the tumor microenvironment, which provides the elements needed for advanced tumor growth (i.e., cytokines, loss of contact inhibition, angiogenesis, and invasion; ref. 25). MMP9 and MMP12 may be of particular relevance in this regard. MMP9 is thought to be an important player in MMP-mediated invasion. It breaks down type IV collagen, a key constituent of the basement membrane, which is breached in invasive bladder cancer (10). In keeping with this, MMP9 has been detected in the urine of patients with bladder cancer but not in normal controls. Furthermore, the levels of MMP9 correlate with the stage and grade of bladder cancer, with elevated levels noted predominantly in the urine of patients with muscle invasive disease (26, 27).

Increased MMP9 levels may be mediated by polymorphisms in the promoter region of the gene. A variety of transcription factor binding sites are in the MMP9 promoter region, including activator protein-1, nuclear factor-{kappa}b, and specificity protein-1 (2830). In addition, the CA microsatellite and –1562 polymorphisms examined in this study are thought to play a role in MMP9 transcription. Greater numbers of CA repeats have been associated with greater expression of MMP9, such that 24 repeats yield ~20 times the production of MMP9 compared with <20 repeats (29, 31, 32).

The MMP9 microsatellite polymorphism has been associated with a higher risk of a number of conditions, including atherosclerosis, multiple sclerosis, mesangial sclerosis, aneurismal disease, and age-related macular degeneration, to name a few (24, 29, 33, 34). Despite the association of MMP9 with malignancy and invasiveness, to date, there is only one study reporting the association of the MMP9 microsatellite polymorphism with malignancy (35). There are, however, data suggesting that chemotherapy induces a shortening of the CA repeats (from 24 to 18), and that this is associated with the decreased expression of MMP9 in a lung cancer cell line (36). Interestingly, our findings showed that patients with a single, higher-expressing ≥24 CA repeat allele had a greater risk of invasive as opposed to superficial bladder cancer. Our results also suggest that smoking in combination with the greater expressing ≥24 CA repeat allele may increase the risk of bladder cancer invasiveness. We observed joint effects of certain MMP polymorphisms (MMP9 microsatellite and MMP12 –82) and smoking, supporting the hypothesis that those with tobacco exposure and variant MMP genotypes would be at an even greater risk of invasive disease. MMP9 expression is heightened by smoking exposure potentially by a nuclear factor-{kappa}b–mediated mechanism (37, 38). Although this study describes associations, it is possible that the variant MMP9 genotype and the adverse environmental exposure may interact resulting in a more invasive phenotype.

MMP12, which is also known as macrophage metalloelastase, is found on chromosome 11q22.3, along with MMP1, MMP3, and MMP8 (20). It is believed to be angiostatic (39). The –82 A/G polymorphism is located in the activator protein-1 transcription factor binding site, and the G allele is associated with decreased expression in vitro (40). Our data suggest that the lower-expressing GG genotype was associated with increased bladder cancer invasiveness, an effect that was heightened when combined with smoking exposure. A potential explanation is that loss of the angiostatic effects of MMP12 preferentially promotes the development of muscle-invasive disease.

We observed that several MMP SNPs may be associated with a protection from bladder cancer invasiveness in former smokers. As the effect of individual MMP polymorphisms on bladder cancer risk may be subtle, we compared the effect of a combination of polymorphisms and showed a significantly greater association (Supplementary Table S3). Many of the alleles that had a protective effect in former smokers are associated with increased expression of the protein, and it is known that the increased expression of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases is associated with higher stage and grade tumors (41, 42). There may be a complex balance between MMPs and their inhibitors. The absence of the protective association in current smokers may be an indication that heavy exposure to smoke overwhelms the genetic effects. Due to the small sample size of this analysis, these results should be interpreted with caution, as chance findings cannot be ruled out.

This study suggests that MMP polymorphisms modify the risk of invasive as opposed to superficial bladder cancer. Despite the large number of SNPs investigated and the great number of MMP genes analyzed, however, this represents only a fraction of a family of enzymes numbering >24. Although we analyzed those MMP genes that are believed to play an important role in the biology of bladder cancer, we cannot rule out the possibility that other polymorphisms in potentially more important members of this family may exist. Furthermore, it is always possible that the associations seen in this type of study are merely linked to the causative factors responsible for the changes in disease risk. Additional studies are therefore required to validate these findings and to further elucidate the functional effect of these polymorphisms on the biology of this disease.

In summary, genetic variations in the MMP family may contribute to the development of invasive bladder cancer. These results, once validated, may help to identify high-risk populations as well as determine an individual's risk of invasive bladder cancer. Further study of the biological ramifications of these polymorphisms may add to our understanding of the biology of the disease and provide potential foci for targeted therapies.


    Footnotes
 
Grant support: National Cancer Institute grants CA74880 and CA91846.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

A.K. Kader and J. Liu are considered equal contributors to this article.

Received 5/16/06; revised 1/15/07; accepted 2/ 7/07.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:106–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Raghavan D, Shipley WU, Garnick MB, Russell PJ, Richie JP. Biology and management of bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1129–38.[Medline]
  3. Wu X-R. Urothelial tumorigenesis: a tale of divergent pathways. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:713–25.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Dinney CPN, McConkey DJ, Millikan RE, et al. Focus on bladder cancer. Cancer Cell 2004;6:111–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Close DR. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:62–7.
  6. Kelly EA, Jarjour NN. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in asthma. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2003;9:28–33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Thompson RW, Parks WC. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1996;800:157–74.[Abstract]
  8. Hojilla CV, Mohammed FF, Khokha R. Matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors direct cell fate during cancer development. Br J Cancer 2003;89:1817–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Sung JY, Park SM, Lee C-H, et al. Proteolytic cleavage of extracellular secreted {alpha}-synuclein via matrix metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem 2005;280:25216–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Yoon SO, Park SJ, Yun CH, Chung AS. Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in tumor metastasis and angiogenesis. J Biochem Mol Biol 2003;36:128–37.[Medline]
  11. Moses M, Wiederschain D, Loughlin K, Zurakowski D, Lamb C, Freeman M. Increased incidence of matrix metalloproteinases in urine of cancer patients. Cancer Res 1998;58:1395–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ozdemir E, Kakehi Y, Okuno H, Yoshida O. Role of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in the basement membrane destruction of superficial urothelial carcinomas. J Urol 1999;161:1359–63.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Nutt JE, Durkan GC, Mellon JK, Lunec J. Matrix metalloproteinases (mmps) in bladder cancer: The induction of mmp9 by epidermal growth factor and its detection in urine. BJU International 2003;91:99–104.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Gatchel JR, Zoghbi HY. Diseases of unstable repeat expansion: mechanisms and common principles. Nat Rev Genet 2005;6:743–55.[Medline]
  15. Ye S. Influence of matrix metalloproteinase genotype on cardiovascular disease susceptibility and outcome. Cardiovasc Res 2006;69:636–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lohmueller KE, Pearce CL, Pike M, Lander ES, Hirschhorn JN. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease. Nat Genet 2003;33:177–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Zeegers MPA, Tan FES, Dorant E, van den Brandt PA. The impact of characteristics of cigarette smoking on urinary tract cancer risk. Cancer 2000;89:630–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Sturgeon SR, Hartge P, Silverman DT, et al. Associations between bladder cancer risk factors and tumor stage and grade at diagnosis. Epidemiology 1994;5:218–25.[Medline]
  19. Hu Z, Huo X, Lu D, et al. Functional polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinase-9 are associated with risk of occurrence and metastasis of lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:5433–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ye S. Polymorphism in matrix metalloproteinase gene promoters: implication in regulation of gene expression and susceptibility of various diseases. Matrix Biol 2000;19:623–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Hinoda Y, Okayama N, Takano N, et al. Association of functional polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinase (mmp)-1 and mmp-3 genes with colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2002;102:526–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Biondi ML, Turri O, Leviti S, et al. Mmp1 and mmp3 polymorphisms in promoter regions and cancer. Clin Chem 2000;46:2023–4.[Free Full Text]
  23. Kanamori Y, Matsushima M, Minaguchi T, et al. Correlation between expression of the matrix metalloproteinase-1 gene in ovarian cancers and an insertion/deletion polymorphism in its promoter region. Cancer Res 1999;59:4225–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Fiotti N, Zivadinov R, Altamura N, et al. Mmp-9 microsatellite polymorphism and multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2004;152:147–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Bjorklund M, Koivunen E. Gelatinase-mediated migration and invasion of cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005;1755:37–69.[Medline]
  26. Gerhards S, Jung K, Koenig F, et al. Excretion of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in urine is associated with a high stage and grade of bladder carcinoma. Urology 2001;57:675–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Sier CFM, Casetta G, Verheijen JH, et al. Enhanced urinary gelatinase activities (matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9) are associated with early-stage bladder carcinoma: a comparison with clinically used tumor markers. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:2333–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sato H, Kita M, Seiki M. V-src activates the expression of 92-kda type iv collagenase gene through the ap-1 site and the gt box homologous to retinoblastoma control elements. A mechanism regulating gene expression independent of that by inflammatory cytokines. J Biol Chem 1993;268:23460–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Peters DG, Kassam A, St. Jean PL, Yonas H, Ferrell RE. Functional polymorphism in the matrix metalloproteinase-9 promoter as a potential risk factor for intracranial aneurysm. Stroke 1999;30:2612–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Zhang B, Ye S, Herrmann S-M, et al. Functional polymorphism in the regulatory region of gelatinase b gene in relation to severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 1999;99:1788–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Fornoni A, Wang Y, Lenz O, Striker LJ, Striker GE. Association of a decreased number of d(ca) repeats in the matrix metalloproteinase-9 promoter with glomerulosclerosis susceptibility in mice. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:2068–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Shimajiri S, Arima N, Tanimoto A, et al. Shortened microsatellite d(ca)21 sequence down-regulates promoter activity of matrix metalloproteinase 9 gene. FEBS Lett 1999;455:70–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Fiotti N, Altamura N, Fisicaro M, et al. Mmp-9 microsatellite polymorphism: association with the progression of intima-media thickening and constrictive remodeling of carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Atherosclerosis 2005;182:287–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Fiotti NMD, Pedio MMD, Parodi MBMD, et al. Mmp-9 microsatellite polymorphism and susceptibility to exudative form of age-related macular degeneration. Genet Med 2005;7:272–7.[Medline]
  35. Kader AK, Shao L, Dinney CP, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase polymorphisms and bladder cancer risk. Cancer Res 2006;66:11644–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Huang T-S, Lee C-C, Chang A-C, et al. Shortening of microsatellite deoxy(ca) repeats involved in gl331-induced down-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003;300:901–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Kang MJ, Oh YM, Lee JC, et al. Lung matrix metalloproteinase-9 correlates with cigarette smoking and obstruction of airflow. J Korean Med Sci 2003;18:821–7.[Medline]
  38. Shishodia S, Aggarwal BB. Cyclooxygenase (cox)-2 inhibitor celecoxib abrogates activation of cigarette smoke-induced nuclear factor (nf)-{kappa}b by suppressing activation of i-{kappa}b {alpha} kinase in human non-small cell lung carcinoma: correlation with suppression of cyclin d1, cox-2, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 10.1158/0008–5472.Can-04–0206. Cancer Res 2004;64:5004–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Egeblad M, Werb Z. New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:161–74.[Medline]
  40. Jormsjo S, Ye S, Moritz J, et al. Allele-specific regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-12 gene activity is associated with coronary artery luminal dimensions in diabetic patients with manifest coronary artery disease. Circ Res 2000;86:998–1003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Gakiopoulou H, Nakopoulou L, Siatelis A, et al. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 as a multifunctional molecule of which the expression is associated with adverse prognosis of patients with urothelial bladder carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:5573–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Grignon DJ, Sakr W, Toth M, et al. High levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (timp-2) expression are associated with poor outcome in invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Res 1996;56:1654–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kader, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kader, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, X.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online