Clinical Cancer Research Targets Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 14, 1926, April 1, 2008. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5134
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kent, D.
Right arrow Articles by Eaves, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kent, D.
Right arrow Articles by Eaves, C.

Molecular Pathways

Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells by the Steel Factor/KIT Signaling Pathway

David Kent, Michael Copley, Claudia Benz, Brad Dykstra, Michelle Bowie and Connie Eaves

Authors' Affiliation: Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Requests for reprints: Connie Eaves, Terry Fox Laboratory, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada. Phone: 604-675-8122; Fax: 604-877-0712; E-mail: ceaves{at}bccrc.ca.

Abstract

Understanding the intrinsic pathways that regulate hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) proliferation and self-renewal responses to external signals offers a rational approach to developing improved strategies for HSC expansion for therapeutic applications. Such studies are also likely to reveal new targets for the treatment of human myeloid malignancies because perturbations of the biological processes that control normal HSC self-renewal divisions are believed to drive the propagation of many of these diseases. Here, we review recent findings that point to the importance of using stringent functional criteria to define HSCs as cells with longterm repopulating activity and evidence that activation of the KIT receptor and many downstream effectors serve as major regulators of changing HSC proliferative and self-renewal behavior during development.


Background

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) constitute a rare, self-sustaining population that appears early in the development of the embryo and is then responsible for mature blood cell production throughout life. HSC numbers can be regulated extrinsically by three mechanisms: (a) altered exposure to factors that control their viability, (b) altered exposure to factors that control their continuing stem cell functionality, and (c) altered exposure to factors that control their proliferative status. Exposure of HSCs to different concentrations of soluble steel factor (SF, also known as stem cell factor, mast cell growth factor, or KIT ligand) is one mechanism that can regulate HSC self-renewal divisions in vitro (1, 2). SF is also an important (but not exclusive) physiologic regulator of HSC activity in vivo (36). Interestingly, during development, many properties of HSCs change, one of which is a marked decrease in SF sensitivity (6, 7). Here, we review current understanding of HSC heterogeneity, how HSCs respond to SF, and the role of candidate downstream effectors identified as important for sustained HSC expansion in vitro and in vivo.

HSCs Represent a Heterogeneous Subset of Multipotent Hematopoietic Cells

The first evidence of a common origin of different blood cell types was provided by both morphologic (8) and cytogenetic (9) studies of what are now recognized as clonal myeloproliferative diseases. This concept was experimentally validated by the discovery of a rare subset of cells in mice that generate multilineage clones in the spleen of myeloablated recipients and that are sustained throughout life (10). The finding that these "colony-forming units spleen" are present in all hematopoietic tissues and exhibit some self-renewal activity when serially transplanted led to their use as a tool for establishing many basic principles expected of an HSC population. Later, genetic tracking analyses formally showed the ability of single hematopoietic cells from normal murine and human donors to establish chimerism in the blood-forming system of transplanted recipients for periods of months to years (1114). In some of these latter studies, the ability of the original cell to produce progeny with extensive multilineage regenerative potential was also documented.

Together, these observations established the existence of HSCs in mice and humans. At the same time, they revealed wide variability in the cell outputs and longevity of individual clones produced in similarly transplanted recipients. This heterogeneous behavior brought into focus the uncertainty of defining HSCs by the regenerative activity they display because such retrospective approaches cannot discriminate behavioral differences caused by variations in the types or sequence of extrinsic cues received by the original cells versus their preexisting intrinsic heterogeneity and/or the role of stochastic events. These issues remain incompletely resolved, although experiments with purified HSCs have recently helped to clarify the situation.

These experiments have revealed the existence of a population, quantifiable in suspensions of unknown purity as longterm competitive repopulating units (15, 16) that, when transplanted as single isolated cells into irradiated recipients, consistently display both longterm lymphomyeloid-repopulating activity and extensive self-renewal activity (7, 1721). HSCs, thus defined, are phenotypically distinct from multilineage hematopoietic cells with shorter-lived regenerative properties including most colony-forming units spleen (22). Tracking of the clonal progeny of multiple single HSCs through two to three serial transplants has also revealed their possession of specific lineage preferences that can be propagated over many self-renewal divisions in vivo. However, these differentiation programs can also change rapidly, both in vivo (e.g., at 3 weeks after birth in mice) and under certain culture conditions (7, 21, 23). These findings support a model in which distinct, although possibly overlapping, molecular mechanisms regulate lineage preferences and their maintenance (self-renewal), with the option that lineage preferences may be initiated before, rather than after, self-renewal potential is lost.

The HSC compartment of fetal and young adult mice can thus now be functionally defined as a restricted compartment of distinct multipotent cells that universally display extensive self-renewal activity when transplanted into irradiated recipients. However, these cells seem to be preprogrammed to display particular patterns of differentiation. Unfortunately, the combination of phenotypic markers used to obtain these cells at very high purities cannot yet be assumed to measure, or even detect, cells with the same properties in uncharacterized cell suspensions. This is because many of the markers in question show variable expression on HSCs according to the activation status of the HSCs and may also be variably expressed on non-HSCs (2426). Future identification of molecular markers that stably associate with self-renewing HSCs independent of their cycling status or differentiation program should help to elucidate the mechanism that allows for longterm maintenance of HSC activity.

Role of SF in Regulating HSCs

SF is a transmembrane growth factor encoded by the Sl gene. SF binds to and activates a type III transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase called KIT (also referred to as CD117; see Fig. 1 ). KIT contains a split intracellular kinase domain and is encoded by a transcriptional unit found at the W locus. Both SF and its receptor can be expressed as different isoforms with different activities and can be cleaved proteolytically to yield soluble forms with similar binding affinity (27, 28).


Figure 1
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of key signaling events activated in primitive hematopoietic cells exposed to SF (here shown as two membrane-bound molecules bound to a dimerized receptor complex). Blue arrows, pathway-promoting activities; red stop lines, inhibiting activities.

 
Even before the products encoded by the W and Sl loci were known to represent a receptor-ligand pair, studies of the defects caused by mutations at both loci had pointed to their involvement in HSC regulation. For example, both fetal and adult hematopoietic tissues from mice carrying mutations within the kinase domain of Kit (e.g., see Fig. 1) show reduced colony-forming units spleen/HSC activity (29). Mice with a W41/W41 genotype are of particular interest because they are viable and fertile (in contrast to those with more severe W-mutations; ref. 30) but still have significantly reduced HSC numbers (10- to 20-fold). As a result, sublethally irradiated adult W41/W41 mice can be used as hosts to detect transplanted (wild-type) HSCs with the same sensitivity as lethally irradiated wild-type hosts given a minimal radioprotective transplant (31, 32). In contrast, Sl-mutant mice, which have deletions in the SF genomic sequence (33), have a defect in the microenvironmental niche that supports the regenerative activity of colony-forming units spleen/HSCs (34).

HSCs from all stages of development express the same levels of the KIT receptor on the cell surface regardless of their cycling status or position in the cell cycle (3, 6, 35, 36). In vitro, the ability of different concentrations of soluble SF to modulate HSC self-renewal divisions directly has been shown using highly purified starting populations and subsequent in vivo readouts of retained or lost HSC activity (1, 2, 18). Moreover, these effects on HSC self-renewal can be elicited even in the absence of changes in HSC viability or cell cycle progression. These experiments have further shown that the self-renewal responses of fetal and adult murine HSCs to soluble SF in serum-free suspension cultures are both steeply SF concentration–dependent above and below an optimum level, but their specific sensitivities to SF are markedly different. Fetal HSCs are 6-fold more sensitive to SF than their adult counterparts with maximum maintenance of fetal HSC activity in medium containing 50 ng/mL of SF (only) compared with the 300 ng/mL of SF (+20 ng/mL IL-11) required to achieve a similar result with adult HSCs (6). The different SF sensitivity displayed by fetal and adult HSCs is likely due to differences in how KIT-activated signals are transmitted to downstream intracellular targets in these cells because both express similar levels of KIT and, under their respective optimal conditions of SF stimulation, they show no differences in apoptosis and divide with the same cell cycle times (7). In vivo, fetal and adult HSCs show marked differences in their cycling activity (35, 37) and also in their self-renewal and differentiation patterns posttransplant (7, 21). All of these properties change abruptly between 3 and 4 weeks after birth in a fashion that seems to be intrinsically determined and preprogrammed. Changes in mechanisms that mediate SF signals may thus offer an attractive explanation for why they display different biological properties in vivo. Interestingly, indirect evidence exists for a similar switch mechanism operating in humans (38) and nonhuman primates (39), as inferred from the finding of an abrupt change in the rate of decline of circulating granulocyte telomeres within the first year after birth.

Candidate Intrinsic Targets of SF Action

Much is known from model cell systems about the pathways that SF can activate, and many of these have been confirmed in primitive HSC-like hematopoietic cell lines (36, 40). Figure 1 summarizes the downstream signaling pathways likely to influence HSC self-renewal responses. SF binding induces receptor homodimerization and autocrossphosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic domain, which then serve as docking sites for various SH2 domain-containing signaling intermediates (41). Activation of KIT also leads to the recruitment and activation of adjacent kinases including JAK2 (42), TEC (43), and MATK (44); the tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2 (45); phospholipase C; and the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (41). The activated KIT receptor complex is then recruited transiently to cell surface lipid rafts where the p110 catalytic subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is located (46). This allows a functional phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase holoenzyme to assemble leading to the subsequent activation of cytosolic PDK1 and AKT/PKB. This is accompanied by a reduction in PTEN levels (a negative regulator of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway) in the rafts, thus, reinforcing the activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway and multiple downstream events including inactivation of the forkhead transcription factor O3A (47) and activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (48). SF-mediated activation of JAK2 leads, in turn, to the activation of STATs 1, 3, and 5, which then form dimers and translocate to the nucleus to alter the transcription of specific target genes (4951). As summarized below, some of these signaling elements and their ultimate transcriptional targets seem to participate in the regulation of HSC amplification, although, in many cases, it has not yet been possible to discriminate between effects on HSC viability or mitogenesis compared with independent effects on their self-renewal control.

Signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 and 5A. Activation of both signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT)3 and STAT5A positively regulate fetal and adult HSC expansion in vivo, as shown by studies with a dominant-negative version of STAT3 (52) and cells from Stat5a–/– mice (53) or human CD34+ cells with RNAi-suppressed STAT5 (54, 55). Conversely, transduction of primitive hematopoietic cells with constitutively active forms of STAT3 (56) or STAT5A (56, 57) enhanced HSC self-renewal divisions under certain conditions and, in the case of STAT5A, led to a myeloproliferative syndrome in vivo. However, levels of STAT3 seem to be nonlimiting in HSCs because overexpression of the native form does not alter HSC amplification in vivo (52), and levels of STAT3 mRNA are found to be significantly higher (~2-fold) in proliferating adult HSCs than in their fetal counterparts (6).

LNK. LNK is one of many adapter molecules that bind to KIT after SF activation. LNK acts as a negative regulator of HSC self-renewal divisions both in vivo, as shown by an increased production of HSCs in Lnk–/– mice (58, 59), and in vitro, as shown by an increased frequency in symmetrical self-renewal divisions executed by Lnk–/– (compared with wild-type) HSCs stimulated with thrombopoietin and SF (60).

Cell cycle regulators [Cyclins D1, 2, and 3 and Cdkn1a/p21Cip1 (p21), Cdkn2a/p16Ink4a (p16), and Cdkn2c/p18Ink4c (p18)]. Expression of the D-type cyclins is induced by mitogenic cytokines and their expression allows the formation of complexes with partner cyclin-dependent kinases leading to entry into S-phase (61). In mice, loss of all three D-type cyclins severely impairs the expansion of HSCs in the fetal liver and posttransplant, although it is likely that this is due to an inability of the cells to transmit a mitogenic signal rather than a direct effect on the HSC self-renewal mechanism itself (62). p21, p16, and p18 are three of several cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors with well-established roles in regulating progression of cells through specific phases of the cell cycle (61). All three have also been implicated as regulators of HSC self-renewal either directly or indirectly. Cells from adult p21–/– mice have markedly reduced numbers of colony-forming units spleen and HSC activity (63). This seems to be caused by their failure to respond to signals that normally induce HSC quiescence (64), which occurs when mice reach the age of 4 weeks (35). In contrast, p16 (65) and p18 (66) deficiencies each endow HSCs with improved longterm repopulating and self-renewal activity, and the latter can partially offset the negative consequence of p21 deficiency in HSCs (67). Interestingly, p18 mRNA is present at significantly lower (~10-fold) levels in fetal compared with proliferating adult HSCs even after the cells have been stimulated to proliferate by SF in vitro (6), a finding consistent with a role of p18 in mediating the observed differences between fetal and adult self-renewal activities in vivo.

BMI1, PHC1 (RAE28), EZH2, and PCGF2 (MEL18). BMI1, PHC1 (RAE28), EZH2, and PCGF2 (MEL18) are members of the polycomb family of transcriptional regulators, all four of which have been implicated in regulating HSC self-renewal activity either positively [BMI1 (68, 69), RAE28 (70), and EZH2 (71)] or negatively (MEL18; ref. 72). MEL18 is of particular interest here because it can inhibit the activity of cyclin D2 by direct physical interaction in the nucleus (73). Interestingly, both MEL18 and EZH2 transcripts are expressed at much higher levels (~10-fold) in quiescent adult compared with proliferating fetal HSCs, whereas BMI1 transcript levels are similar in both (7).

Forkhead transcription factor A. Forkhead transcription factor A is a member of the forkhead box family of transcription factors that have major roles in longevity and stress resistance (74). Deletion of the Foxo3a gene allows HSCs to be generated but inhibits both their ability to enter a quiescent state and their survival. Interestingly, this is associated with an inhibition of p21 expression and an increase in the expression of cyclin D2 (74, 75).

Therapeutic Implications

HSC-containing transplants from donors of all ages are the basis of thousands of annually performed life-saving therapies where they are used to re-establish normal blood formation in patients given a myeloablative treatment to eradicate a defective or malignant hematopoietic condition. Major improvements in these therapeutic strategies and others requiring the transient replacement of specific types of mature blood cells could be envisaged if current barriers to the production of large numbers of HSCs in vitro were overcome. In addition, accumulating evidence indicates that most human myeloid malignancies involve perturbations of pathways that regulate normal HSCs (76). All of these issues highlight the need for a more precise understanding of the intrinsic molecular anatomy of normal HSCs and how this can be altered by interactions of HSCs with fluctuating cues from their environment that signal changing needs for blood cell production.

The recent, more stringent, biological characterization of HSCs and the development of methods for their isolation in close to pure form from the fetal liver and bone marrow of young mice has made it possible to obtain more precise descriptions of the molecular differences between these two critical cell populations. The information thus acquired has opened the door to more incisive analysis of the mechanisms that regulate HSC self-renewal activity in vivo where SF signaling has been shown to be an important cue for change that is differently interpreted by fetal and adult HSCs. The complexity of this process, its remarkable alteration soon after birth, and the need to investigate the full relevance of these findings for normal and leukemic human HSCs remain exciting challenges for the future.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Allen Eaves, Laura Sly, and Clay Smith for useful suggestions.

Footnotes

Grant support: National Cancer Institute of Canada with funds from the Terry Fox Foundation (C. Eaves), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (D. Kent), and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (D. Kent, M. Copley, and C. Eaves).

Received 1/ 7/08; accepted 1/14/08.

References

  1. Audet J, Miller CL, Eaves CJ, Piret JM. Common and distinct features of cytokine effects on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells revealed by dose response surface analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 2002;80:393–404.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Zandstra PW, Conneally E, Petzer AL, Piret JM, Eaves CJ. Cytokine manipulation of primitive human hematopoietic cell self-renewal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:4698–703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ikuta K, Weissman IL. Evidence that hematopoietic stem cells express mouse c-kit but do not depend on steel factor for their generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:1502–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Miller CL, Rebel VI, Helgason CD, Lansdorp PM, Eaves CJ. Impaired steel factor responsiveness differentially affects the detection and longterm maintenance of fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Blood 1997;89:1214–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Miller CL, Rebel VI, Lemieux ME, Helgason CD, Lansdorp PM, Eaves CJ. Studies of W mutant mice provide evidence for alternate mechanisms capable of activating hematopoietic stem cells. Exp Hematol 1996;24:185–94.[Medline]
  6. Bowie MB, Kent DG, Copley MR, Eaves CJ. Steel factor responsiveness regulates the high self-renewal phenotype of fetal hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 2007;109:5043–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bowie MB, Kent DG, Dykstra B, et al. Identification of a new intrinsically timed developmental checkpoint that reprograms key hematopoietic stem cell properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:5878–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Dameshek W. Some speculations on the myeloproliferative syndromes. Blood 1951;6:372–5.[Free Full Text]
  9. Nowell PC, Hungerford DA. Chromosome studies on normal and leukemic human leukocytes. J Natl Cancer Inst 1960;25:85–109.[Medline]
  10. Till JE, McCulloch EA. Hemopoietic stem cell differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1980;605:431–59.[Medline]
  11. Dick JE, Magli MC, Huszar D, Phillips RA, Bernstein A. Introduction of a selectable gene into primitive stem cells capable of long-term reconstitution of the hemopoietic system of W/Wv mice. Cell 1985;42:71–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Keller G, Paige C, Gilboa E, Wagner EF. Expression of a foreign gene in myeloid and lymphoid cells derived from multipotent haematopoietic precursors. Nature 1985;318:149–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Lemischka IR, Raulet DH, Mulligan RC. Developmental potential and dynamic behavior of hematopoietic stem cells. Cell 1986;45:917–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Wu AM, Till JE, Siminovitch L, McCulloch EA. Cytological evidence for a relationship between normal hemotopoietic colony-forming cells and cells of the lymphoid system. J Exp Med 1968;127:455–64.[Abstract]
  15. Szilvassy SJ. The biology of hematopoietic stem cells. Arch Med Res 2003;34:446–60.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Szilvassy SJ, Nicolini FE, Eaves CJ, Miller CL. Quantitation of murine and human hematopoietic stem cells by limiting-dilution analysis in competitively repopulated hosts. In: Jordon CT, Klug CA, editors. Methods in Molecular Medicine: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Protocols. 63. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2002. p. 167–187.
  17. Benveniste P, Cantin C, Hyam D, Iscove NN. Hematopoietic stem cells engraft in mice with absolute efficiency. Nat Immunol 2003;4:708–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Uchida N, Dykstra B, Lyons KJ, Leung FYK, Eaves CJ. Different in vivo repopulating activities of purified hematopoietic stem cells before and after being stimulated to divide in vitro with the same kinetics. Exp Hematol 2003;31:1338–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Kiel MJ, Yilmaz OH, Iwashita T, Yilmaz OH, Terhorst C, Morrison SJ. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 2005;121:1109–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Yilmaz OH, Kiel MJ, Morrison SJ. SLAM family markers are conserved among hematopoietic stem cells from old and reconstituted mice and markedly increase their purity. Blood 2006;107:924–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Dykstra B, Kent D, Bowie M, et al. Long-term propagation of distinct hematopoietic differentiation programs in vivo. Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:218–29.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Bryder D, Rossi DJ, Weissman IL. Hematopoietic stem cells: the paradigmatic tissuespecific stem cell. Am J Pathol 2006;169:338–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Muller-Sieburg CE, Sieburg HB. The GOD of hematopoietic stem cells: a clonal diversity model of the stem cell compartment. Cell Cycle 2006;5:394–8.[Medline]
  24. Spangrude GJ, Brooks DM, Tumas DB. Long-term repopulation of irradiated mice with limiting numbers of purified hematopoietic stem cells: in vivo expansion of stem cell phenotype but not function. Blood 1995;85:1006–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Eaves CJ, Eaves AC. Part II. Cell biology and pathobiology. Anatomy and physiology of hematopoiesis. In: Pui C-H, ed. Childhood Leukemias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 69–105.
  26. Morrison SJ, Lagasse E, Weissman IL. Demonstration that thylo subsets of mouse bone marrow that express high levels of lineage markers are not significant hematopoietic progenitors. Blood 1994;83:3480–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Wypych J, Bennett LG, Schwartz MG, et al. Soluble kit receptor in human serum. Blood 1995;85:66–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Zsebo KM, Wypych J, McNiece IK, et al. Identification, purification, and biological characterization of hematopoietic stem cell factor from buffalo rat liver-conditioned medium. Cell 1990;63:195–201.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. McCulloch EA, Siminovitch L, Till JE. Spleen colony formation in anemic mice of genotype W/Wv. Science 1964;144:844–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Geissler EN, McFarland EC, Russell ES. Analysis of pleiotropism at the dominant whitespotting (W) locus of the house mouse: a description of ten new W alleles. Genetics 1981;97:337–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Miller CL, Eaves CJ. Expansion in vitro of adult murine hematopoietic stem cells with transplantable lympho-myeloid reconstituting ability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:13648–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Trevisan M, Yan XQ, Iscove NN. Cycle initiation and colony formation in culture by murine marrow cells with long-term reconstituting potential in vivo. Blood 1996;88:4149–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Huang E, Nocka K, Beier DR, et al. The hematopoietic growth factor KL is encoded by the Sl locus and is the ligand of the c-kit receptor, the gene product of the W locus. Cell 1990;63:225–33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. McCulloch EA, Siminovitch L, Till JE, Russell ES, Bernstein SE. The cellular basis of the genetically determined hemopoietic defect in anaemic mice of genotype Sld/Sld. Blood 1965;26:399–410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Bowie MB, McKnight KD, Kent DG, McCaffrey L, Hoodless PA, Eaves CJ. Hematopoietic stem cells proliferate until after birth and show a reversible phase-specific engraftment defect. J Clin Invest 2006;116:2808–16.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Ashman LK. The biology of stem cell factor and its receptor C-kit. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1999;31:1037–51.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Morrison SJ, Wandycz AM, Akashi K, Globerson A, Weissman IL. The aging of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med 1996;2:1011–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Lansdorp PM, Dragowska W, Mayani H. Ontogeny-related changes in proliferative potential of human hematopoietic cells. J Exp Med 1993;178:787–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Baerlocher GM, Rice K, Vulto I, Lansdorp PM. Longitudinal data on telomere length in leukocytes from newborn baboons support a marked drop in stem cell turnover around one year of age. Aging Cell 2007;6:121–3.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Broudy VC. Stem cell factor and hematopoiesis. Blood 1997;90:1345–64.[Free Full Text]
  41. Linnekin D. Early signaling pathways activated by c-Kit in hematopoietic cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1999;31:1053–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Weiler SR, Mou S, DeBerry CS, et al. JAK2 is associated with the c-kit proto-oncogene product and is phosphorylated in response to stem cell factor. Blood 1996;87:3688–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Tang B, Mano H, Yi T, Ihle JN. Tec kinase associates with c-kit and is tyrosine phosphorylated and activated following stem cell factor binding. Mol Cell Biol 1994;14:8432–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Jhun BH, Rivnay B, Price D, Avraham H. The MATK tyrosine kinase interacts in a specific and SH2-dependent manner with c-Kit. J Biol Chem 1995;270:9661–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Kozlowski M, Larose L, Lee F, Le DM, Rottapel R, Siminovitch KA. SHP-1 binds and negatively modulates the c-Kit receptor by interaction with tyrosine 569 in the c-Kit juxtamembrane domain. Mol Cell Biol 1998;18:2089–99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Jahn T, Leifheit E, Gooch S, Sindhu S, Weinberg K. Lipid rafts are required for Kit survival and proliferation signals. Blood 2007;110:1739–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Engstrom M, Karlsson R, Jonsson JI. Inactivation of the forkhead transcription factor FoxO3 is essential for PKB-mediated survival of hematopoietic progenitor cells by kit ligand. Exp Hematol 2003;31:316–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Wandzioch E, Edling CE, Palmer RH, Carlsson L, Hallberg B. Activation of the MAP kinase pathway by c-Kit is PI-3 kinase dependent in hematopoietic progenitor/stem cell lines. Blood 2004;104:51–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Deberry C, Mou S, Linnekin D. Stat1 associates with c-kit and is activated in response to stem cell factor. Biochem J 1997;327:73–80.[Medline]
  50. Gotoh A, Takahira H, Mantel C, Litz-Jackson S, Boswell HS, Broxmeyer HE. Steel factor induces serine phosphorylation of Stat3 in human growth factor-dependent myeloid cell lines. Blood 1996;88:138–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Ryan JJ, Huang H, McReynolds LJ, et al. Stem cell factor activates STAT-5 DNA binding in IL-3-derived bone marrow mast cells. Exp Hematol 1997;25:357–62.[Medline]
  52. Oh IH, Eaves CJ. Overexpression of a dominant negative form of STAT3 selectively impairs hematopoietic stem cell activity. Oncogene 2002;21:4778–87.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Bunting KD, Bradley HL, Hawley TS, Moriggl R, Sorrentino BP, Ihle JN. Reduced lymphomyeloid repopulating activity from adult bone marrow and fetal liver of mice lacking expression of STAT5. Blood 2002;99:479–87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Li G, Wang Z, Zhang Y, et al. STAT5 requires the N-domain to maintain hematopoietic stem cell repopulating function and appropriate lymphoid-myeloid lineage output. Exp Hematol 2007;35:1684–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Schepers H, van Gosliga D, Wierenga AT, Eggen BJ, Schuringa JJ, Vellenga E. STAT5 is required for long-term maintenance of normal and leukemic human stem/progenitor cells. Blood 2007;110:2880–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Chung YJ, Park BB, Kang YJ, Kim TM, Eaves C, Oh IH. Unique effects of STAT3 on the early phase of hematopoietic stem cell regeneration. Blood 2006;108:1208–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Kato Y, Iwama A, Tadokoro Y, et al. Selective activation of STAT5 unveils its role in stem cell self-renewal in normal and leukemic hematopoiesis. J Exp Med 2005;202:169–79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Ema H, Sudo K, Seita J, et al. Quantification of self-renewal capacity in single hematopoietic stem cells from normal and Lnk-deficient mice. Dev Cell 2005;8:907–14.[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Nobuhisa I, Takizawa M, Takaki S, et al. Regulation of hematopoietic development in the aorta-gonad-mesonephros region mediated by Lnk adaptor protein. Mol Cell Biol 2003;23:8486–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Seita J, Ema H, Ooehara J, et al. Lnk negatively regulates self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells by modifying thrombopoietin-mediated signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:2349–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. Living with or without cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases. Genes Dev 2004;18:2699–711.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Kozar K, Ciemerych MA, Rebel VI, et al. Mouse development and cell proliferation in the absence of D-cyclins. Cell 2004;118:477–91.[CrossRef][Medline]
  63. Mantel C, Lou Z, Canfield J, Braun S, Deng C, Broxmeyer HE. Involvement of p21cip-1 and p27kip-1 in the molecular mechanisms of steel factor-induced proliferative synergy in vitro and of p21cip-1 in the maintenance of stem/progenitor cells in vivo. Blood 1996;88:3710–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Cheng T, Rodrigues N, Shen H, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence maintained by p21cip1/waf1. Science 2000;287:1804–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Janzen V, Forkert R, Fleming HE, et al. Stem-cell ageing modified by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a. Nature 2006;443:421–6.[Medline]
  66. Yuan Y, Shen H, Franklin DS, Scadden DT, Cheng T. In vivo self-renewing divisions of haematopoietic stem cells are increased in the absence of the early G1-phase inhibitor, p18INK4C. Nat Cell Biol 2004;6:436–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
  67. Yu H, Yuan Y, Shen H, Cheng T. Hematopoietic stem cell exhaustion impacted by p18 INK4C and p21 Cip1/Waf1 in opposite manners. Blood 2006;107:1200–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Lessard J, Sauvageau G. Bmi-1 determines the proliferative capacity of normal and leukaemic stem cells. Nature 2003;423:255–60.[CrossRef][Medline]
  69. Park IK, Qian D, Kiel M, et al. Bmi-1 is required for maintenance of adult self-renewing haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 2003;423:302–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  70. Ohta H, Sawada A, Kim JY, et al. Polycomb group gene rae28 is required for sustaining activity of hematopoietic stem cells. J Exp Med 2002;195:759–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Kamminga LM, Bystrykh LV, de Boer A, et al. The Polycomb group gene Ezh2 prevents hematopoietic stem cell exhaustion. Blood 2006;107:2170–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Kajiume T, Ninomiya Y, Ishihara H, Kanno R, Kanno M. Polycomb group gene mel-18 modulates the self-renewal activity and cell cycle status of hematopoietic stem cells. Exp Hematol 2004;32:571–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  73. Chun T, Rho SB, Byun HJ, Lee JY, Kong G. The polycomb group gene product Mel-18 interacts with cyclin D2 and modulates its activity. FEBS Lett 2005;579:5275–580.[CrossRef][Medline]
  74. Tothova Z, Kollipara R, Huntly BJ, et al. FoxOs are critical mediators of hematopoietic stem cell resistance to physiologic oxidative stress. Cell 2007;128:325–39.[CrossRef][Medline]
  75. Miyamoto K, Araki K, Naka K, et al. Foxo3a is essential for maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool. Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:101–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  76. Krause DS, Van Etten RA. Right on target: eradicating leukemic stem cells. Trends Mol Med 2007;13:470–81.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. N. Davis, A. C. Hilyard, P. H. Nguyen, G. Lagna, and A. Hata
Induction of MicroRNA-221 by Platelet-derived Growth Factor Signaling Is Critical for Modulation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Phenotype
J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2009; 284(6): 3728 - 3738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kent, D.
Right arrow Articles by Eaves, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kent, D.
Right arrow Articles by Eaves, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online