Clinical Cancer Research  Stand Up to Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitacre, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitacre, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, N. A.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 5, 665-672, March 1999
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology

Detection of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Cleavage in Response to Treatment with Topoisomerase I Inhibitors: A Potential Surrogate End Point to Assess Treatment Effectiveness1

Cecilia M. Whitacre, Elizabeth Zborowska, James K. V. Willson and Nathan A. Berger2

Departments of Medicine and Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4937


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) by caspases is a prominent characteristic of apoptosis or programmed cell death shown to be induced by topoisomerase (Topo) inhibitors. Because Topo I inhibitors have been shown to be effective in the treatment of some patients with colon cancer, we considered the possibility of using PARP cleavage as an early predictor of responsiveness to this class of agents.

We show cleavage of PARP in response to treatment with Topo I inhibitors in colon cancer both in vitro and in vivo: (a) in vitro in SW480, HCT116, VACO5, VACO6, VACO8, VACO411, VACO425, and VACO451 human colon cancer cell lines treated with topotecan (TPT) or CPT-11; (b) in vivo in SW480, VACO451, and VRC5 colon cancer xenografts grown in athymic mice treated with TPT or CPT-11; and (c) in vivo in colon cancer samples from patients undergoing a Phase II clinical trial with CPT-11. Our results show a strong correlation between percentage of PARP cleavage and percentage of acridine orange-positive cells in colon cancer cell lines treated with 0.1 µM TPT for 24 and 48 h, confirming that PARP cleavage is a useful marker for programmed cell death in colon cancer cell lines. Results from experiments performed on colon cancer xenografts also show an association between PARP cleavage and response to treatment with TPT or CPT-11. The increase of PARP cleavage in xenografts and in clinical samples corresponding to treatment with Topo I inhibitors suggests that this procedure may have early predictive value to assess effectiveness of treatment. These results provide the basis for determining the validity of using PARP cleavage as an early marker of chemotherapeutic effectiveness in human samples.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PARP3 is a nuclear protein activated by single- and double-stranded DNA breaks (1) and involved in multiple processes including DNA replication (2) , DNA repair (3 , 4) , cell differentiation (5) , transformation (6) and cell cycle regulation (7 , 8) . Cleavage of PARP and other proteins occurs during cell death (9, 10, 11) . A variety of stimuli (12, 13, 14, 15) induce a caspase-mediated proteolytic cleavage of PARP between Asp 216 and Gly 217, which divides the NH2-terminal DNA-binding domain of PARP from its COOH-terminal catalytic domain (12 , 13) , generating two fragments of about Mr 90,000 and Mr 26,000. We have shown previously in several different cell types that the Topo I inhibitor-induced cleavage of PARP is characteristic of PCD and is proportional to the number of apoptotic cells measured by acridine orange staining (15) . Although PARP cleavage has been shown previously to occur as part of PCD in human cell lines in culture, this event has not been demonstrated to occur in human tissues undergoing PCD in vivo.

Camptothecin analogues, which function as Topo I inhibitors, are presently in clinical use for therapy of several tumor types and are under extensive investigation and therapeutic evaluation in a number of clinical trials (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24) . Preclinical and clinical studies show great promise for the use of the camptothecin analogues CPT-11 (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24) , TPT (18 , 20 , 25) , and 9-aminocamptothecin (17 , 18 , 20) as chemotherapeutic agents. CPT-11 has been shown to have clinical effectiveness against advanced colorectal cancers (21, 22, 23, 24) . Topo I inhibitors are known to bind to the complex formed between the nuclear enzyme Topo I and DNA throughout the cell cycle (26) . The ternary complex confers higher stability to the Topo I-DNA ligand, thus hampering the religation of Topo I-linked single-strand breaks. These events initiate the activation of the apoptotic pathway that culminates with cleavage of PARP and DNA fragmentation (13, 14, 15) . We have described previously the kinetics of the effect of Topo I inhibitors on PARP cleavage and PCD in various cell lines (15) and their effect on the growth rate of SW480 colon cancer xenografts (25) . The goals of this study were: (a) to determine whether PARP cleavage could be used as a marker of PCD in colon cancer cell lines; (b) to assess whether PARP cleavage could be used as an early marker to predict response to Topo I inhibitors in vivo; and (c) to determine whether tumors in humans demonstrate PARP cleavage in response to chemotherapy with CPT-11. The studies were carried out with colon cancer cell lines growing in tissue culture, with xenografts growing in athymic mice, as well as with metastatic tumors in patients with colon cancer.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Lines.
VACO5, VACO6, VACO8, VACO451, VACO425, and VACO411 colon cancer cell lines are from the Case Western Reserve University cell line bank (27) . SW480 and HCT116 colon cancer cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. VACO5, VACO6, VACO8, and HCT116 cells were maintained in MEM with Earles’ salts supplemented with 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (Grand Island Biological Co., Grand Island, NY) and 8% heat-inactivated FBS. VACO411 and VACO425 were grown in the same medium but supplemented with 2% FBS. VACO 451, VACO 411, and VACO 425 were, in addition, maintained in the presence of insulin (10 µg/ml; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), 300 µM ascorbate, 2.5 mM pyruvate, and 2 mML-glutamine (Grand Island Biological Co.). VRC5 human colon cancer cells (obtained from Dr. P. J. Houghton, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Ref. 28 ) and SW480 human colon cancer cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% FBS. All cells were maintained in culture at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.

Treatment in Vitro.
Cells in early logarithmic growth were cultured in T75 polystyrene flasks and treated with 0.01, 0.1, 1, or 10 µM TPT or 20 µM CPT-11 for 24, 48, or 72 h, as indicated for each particular experiment. TPT was from the Drug Synthesis and Chemistry Branch of the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD), and CPT-11 was from Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. (Kalamazoo, MI). Control samples treated with 1:1000 DMSO from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ), used as vehicle, were included. At the end of each treatment, all cells within the culture (suspension and trypsinized cells) were pooled, an aliquot was taken for acridine orange staining, and the remaining cells were centrifuged at 1000 x g and washed with PBS. Cell pellets were stored at -80°C for further analysis of PARP cleavage by Western blotting.

Acridine Orange Staining.
To 100 µl of the cell suspension were added 10 µl of a 100 µg/ml solution of acridine orange in PBS. A minimum of 100 cells/point was counted using a fluorescence microscope. The cells with condensed chromatin were counted as acridine orange positive, whereas those with a homogeneous chromatin pattern were counted as acridine orange negative (15 , 29 , 30) . Condensation of chromatin in apoptotic bodies is a hallmark of apoptosis but not necrosis.

Xenograft Generation and Animal Treatment.
Four-week-old, female, athymic mice (athymic nu/nu; Ireland Cancer Center Athymic Animal Facility), about 20–22 g body weight, were inoculated s.c. on both sides, behind the anterior forelimb with 5 x 106 cells in 0.2 ml of serum-free MEM as described previously (25) . Each group was comprised of eight animals each or 16 xenografts. Animals were maintained under pathogen-free conditions. After xenografts reached about 50 mm3 in size, animals were treated with Topo I inhibitors as follows. Vehicle solution (1:1000 DMSO in PBS) or Topo inhibitor were administered i.p. in the doses and times indicated for each experiment. Selection of doses was based on previous reports (25 , 28) and was in the range of the maximum tolerated dose. Growth curves were performed in five of the eight animals by externally measuring tumors in three dimensions using a caliper. Tumor volume (V) was determined by the following equation: V = (L x W x H x 0.5236, where L is length, W is the width, and H is the height of the xenograft (31) . The remaining three animals were sacrificed 24 h after the last drug dose, and the xenografts were resected. Xenografts were then instantly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for further analysis of PARP cleavage by SDS-PAGE (Refs. 15 and 32 ) and Western blotting (15) .

Biopsies of Tumor Metastasis from Patients in Phase II Clinical Trial with CPT-11.
After signing informed consent, patients with metastatic colon cancers were administered a 90-min infusion of 125 mg/m2 CPT-11. Samples from metastatic tumors in the liver, pelvis, or retroperitoneum were obtained with a 14-gauge needle biopsy under CT guidance immediately before treatment and 24 h after treatment. The tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for analysis of PARP cleavage by Western blotting procedure. Tumor biopsy specimens were divided into sections to analyze the biochemical parameters and confirm tumor histology.

Origin of Antibodies.
A monoclonal antibody to purified human PARP, named 4-C10-5, was developed and isolated by protein A/G Sepharose chromatography in our laboratories. The antibody is an IgG1{kappa} that shows specificity for the NAD binding domain of PARP and reacts with the Mr 116,000 enzyme as well as with the Mr 90,000 degradation product in human cells (15 , 16 , 33) . This antibody is now commercially available (PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Monoclonal mouse Ab-1 to actin was from Oncogene Science (Uniondale, NY). Peroxidase-linked anti-mouse immunoglobulin from sheep was from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL).

Western Blotting.
Cells and xenograft samples were sonicated in a lysis buffer comprised of 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.2% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 1% NP40, 5 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride in PBS (reagents were from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Samples (35 µg of protein measured by Bio-Rad Dc kit) were mixed with sample buffer containing ß-mercapto ethanol (0.05% v/v), SDS (2% w/v), Tris (118 mM), glycerol (10%), and traces of bromphenol blue to the final concentrations indicated. Samples were then boiled in a 100°C water bath for 5 min and separated by SDS-PAGE consisting of a 5% (w/v) acrylamide stacking gel and a 12.5% (w/v) acrylamide separating gel containing 0.1% SDS (32) . The running buffer was comprised of 0.1% SDS, 25 mM Tris, and 250 mM glycine (pH 8.3). Electrophoretic fractionation was carried out at a constant current of 15 mA until bromphenol blue migrated about 10 cm. Proteins were then electrotransferred (15) onto an Immobilon p15 membrane (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). The filters were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS, then incubated overnight at 4°C with 1 µg/ml of primary antibody (anti-PARP or anti-actin as an internal standard for protein loading). The secondary antibody was horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-immunoglobulin (1:1000 in blocking solution). Controls to evaluate reactivity of proteins with secondary antibody alone were included. Bands were visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence reagent and subsequent exposure to hyperfilm-enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham). Intensity of the bands was quantified by densitometric scanning (SCIscan 5000 USB densitometer; United States Biochemical, Cleveland, OH) and normalized with respect to actin. Controls loading increasing amounts of protein were included that confirmed the linearity of the densitometric measurements (data not shown). Because the 4C10-5 antibody recognizes the Mr 116,000 native PARP band and the Mr 90,000 PARP cleavage fragment, we estimate the percentage PARP cleavage as follows: Intensity of Mr 90,000 PARP band x 100/Intensity of Mr 90,000 PARP band + Intensity of Mr 116,000 PARP band (15) .


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Time and Dose Dependence of PARP Cleavage in Human Colon Cancer Cell Lines.
SW480 cells in logarithmic growth were incubated with 0.01, 0.1, 1, or 10 µM TPT or 20 µM CPT-11 for 24, 48, or 72 h. The time course and TPT dose response of the cleavage of PARP in SW480 cells, as measured by Western blotting, is shown in Fig. 1ACitation . Fig. 1BCitation shows the densitometric profile of these results. Western blot of the time course of PARP cleavage in response to 20 µM CPT-11 for 24, 48, or 72 h in SW480 cells and its densitometric profile are shown in Fig. 1CCitation . Percentage PARP cleavage clearly increased with time of exposure and with elevated doses of the Topo I inhibitor. Only the Mr 116,000 band corresponding to intact PARP protein and the Mr 90,000 fragment typical of apoptotic cell death were visualized in all cells analyzed in tissue culture conditions.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Induction of PARP cleavage by TPT in SW480 colon cancer cells. A, Western blot to detect cleavage of PARP after treatment with 0.01, 0.1, 1, or 10 µM TPT for 0, 24, 48, or 72 h. The Mr 116,000 and 90,000 bands correspond to reactivity with PARP antibody, whereas the Mr 46,000 band corresponds to reactivity with actin antibody used in a second step as an internal standard. B, densitometric profile of the results shown in A. C, effect of 20 µM CPT-11 on the time course of PARP cleavage on SW480 cells and its densitometric profile.

 
Correlation between PARP Cleavage and Morphological Evidence of Apoptosis in Colon Cancer Cells Treated in Tissue Culture with TPT.
In vitro experiments performed with HCT116, VACO5, VACO6, VACO8, VACO411, VACO425, and VACO451 colon cancer cell lines showed time and dose dependency of the cleavage of PARP in cells treated with TPT, as described for SW480 cells in Fig. 1Citation . Fig. 2ACitation shows control acridine orange-negative cells with homogeneous chromatin distribution. Fig. 2BCitation shows the typical acridine orange conformation of apoptotic cells after treatment with 0.1 µM TPT for 48 h. The acridine orange-positive cells show chromatin condensation in apoptotic bodies, a hallmark of apoptotic cell death, and cell membrane blebbing. Fig. 2Citation shows a strong correlation between the percentage of PARP cleavage and percentage of apoptotic cells measured by acridine orange staining at 24 h (Fig. 2C)Citation and 48 h (Fig. 2D)Citation . Nonparametric statistics were performed, resulting in Spearman correlation coefficient Rs: 0.88 (P < 0.005) and 0.91 (P < 0.002) at 24 and 48 h treatment with 0.1 µM TPT. respectively. We have chosen SW480 and VACO451 colon cancer cell lines to perform the in vivo experiments described below because of their location at the extremes of the curve, SW480 being among the most resistant and VACO451 among the most sensitive.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Association between percentage of PARP cleavage and percentage of acridine orange-positive colon cancer cells in vitro. A, acridine orange-negative cells. B, acridine orange-positive cells showing chromatin condensation in apoptotic bodies (arrow) and cell membrane blebbing typical of apoptosis. C, correlation between percentage of acridine orange (%AO)-positive cells and percentage PARP cleavage in colon cancer cell lines treated with 0.1 µM TPT for 24 h. Spearman correlation coefficient Rs was 0.88 (P < 0.005). D, correlation between percentage of acridine orange (%AO)-positive cells and percentage of PARP cleavage in colon cancer cell lines treated with 0.1 µM TPT for 48 h. Spearman correlation coefficient Rs was 0.91 (P < 0.002).

 
Growth Inhibition and PARP Cleavage in SW480 xenografts by TPT or CPT-11.
The effects of TPT and CPT-11 on tumor growth and PARP cleavage were evaluated in athymic mice bearing SW480 (Fig. 3)Citation and VACO451 (data not shown) colon cancer xenografts. Mice bearing SW480 xenografts were treated with increasing doses of TPT (1.25, 2.5, or 5 mg/kg) or CPT-11 (10 or 40 mg/kg) for five consecutive days. Fig. 3ACitation shows the growth rate of xenografts in control and TPT-treated mice and PARP cleavage in xenografts assayed 24 h after completion of five daily sequential doses of TPT at the doses indicated. Results from Western blotting represent a portion of a xenograft (three different xenografts per treatment were analyzed). Fig. 3BCitation shows the corresponding curve for CPT-11 treatment and PARP cleavage. The Topo I inhibitors clearly induced growth delay but not tumor regression. The results show that the maximum tumor response was already achieved with 1.25 mg/kg TPT or 10 mg/kg CPT-11 and was not improved by higher doses of either drug. In regard to the results of the percentage of PARP cleavage in these xenografts, some control samples showed a low degree of spontaneous PARP cleavage (0–5%). Results obtained by densitometric scanning from the Western blot in Fig. 3BCitation show 12% PARP cleavage induced by 1.25 mg/kg TPT, 12% PARP cleavage induced by 2.5 mg/kg TPT, and 10% PARP cleavage induced by 5 mg/kg TPT. Thus, the percentage of PARP cleavage was concomitant with the results of the growth curve, showing little or no differences between the three doses analyzed. Because the percentage PARP cleavage in vitro is associated with apoptosis or PCD, these results suggest that drug-induced growth delay is partially due to tumor cell death and repopulation rather than simple drug-induced inhibition of cell proliferation. Identical results were obtained in VACO451 xenografts under the same experimental conditions (data not shown). Fig. 3CCitation is an immunoblot showing the entire molecular weight range in different animals from the same experiment shown in Fig. 3BCitation , corresponding to control, treatment with 5 mg/kg TPT, and treatment with 40 mg/kg CPT-11 showing 7, 10, and 6% PARP cleavage, respectively. Here we can evaluate PARP cleavage fragments with Mr different than the Mr 90,000 fragment described for apoptosis. Shah et al. (11) have detected smaller fragments at Mr 50,000, 40,000, and 35,000 in HL-60 necrotic cells. As shown in Fig. 3CCitation , in xenografts we have detected several bands reactive with the secondary antibody alone (anti-mouse IgG). The major bands were at Mr 66,000–75,000, 50,000 and 25,000, whereas other minor bands were sometimes visualized at Mr 55,000, 49,000, and 40,000. After incubation of the membrane with antibody to PARP, the Mr 116,000 and 90,000 were visualized. Levels of the Mr 90,000 fragment were proportional to tumor response. In the control sample, we also observed an Mr 50,000 band reactive to PARP antibody that coincides with an IgG band.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of CPT-11 on PARP cleavage in human samples. A, samples from four patients treated with CPT-11 were subjected to analysis with Western blotting to detect cleavage of PARP as described in "Materials and Methods." C, control samples obtained immediately before initiation of treatment; T, samples from the same patient obtained 24 h after initiation of treatment by CT-directed needle biopsy. B, immunoblot showing the entire molecular weight range.

 
Effect of TPT or CPT-11 on VRC5 Colon Cancer Xenografts.
A more pronounced effect on PARP cleavage was shown in mice bearing the VRC5 human colon cancer xenografts that was shown previously to undergo tumor regression in response to treatment with Topo I inhibitors (30) . Drugs were administered in three cycles of 5 days, each separated by 2 days of rest. Treatment on days 1–5 was referred to as cycle 1, on days 8–12 was referred to as cycle 2, and on days 15–19 was referred to as cycle 3. Results shown in Fig. 4, A and BCitation , indicate that treatment of VRC5 xenografts with TPT (2.5 mg/kg) induced a delay of tumor growth. Between days 13 and 23, the size of the tumor regressed modestly by about 100 mm3 before resuming growth between days 27–30. In contrast, treatment with CPT-11 (20 mg/kg) induced about 40% regression of tumors by the end of cycle 3 (Fig. 4B)Citation , when the drug was administered daily in the same three cycles described above. Fig. 4BCitation also shows PARP cleavage measured by Western blotting in one VRC5 xenograft per treatment in samples resected 24 h after the second and third 5-day cycles. Although baseline levels of PARP cleavage were observed in some control samples, increased PARP cleavage was evident in all treated samples compared with the controls. Treatment with TPT induced 13% PARP cleavage by the end of the second cycle and 20% PARP cleavage by the end of the third cycle, evaluated in samples shown in Fig. 4BCitation . These results are similar to those observed in other animals (Fig. 4C)Citation of the same experiment showing 28% PARP cleavage. Although at these times the tumors were about three times larger than at the start of treatment, they were in a regression phase compared with their size only 3 days earlier. Thus, the results and implications are similar to those observed with TPT treatment of the SW480 xenograft. The VRC5 tumor treated with CPT-11 showed 39% PARP cleavage after the second cycle of therapy and 28% PARP cleavage after the third cycle, evaluated from the Western blot shown in Fig. 4BCitation . Results from another animal in the same experiment (Fig. 4C)Citation show 37% PARP cleavage after the third cycle. These higher levels of PARP cleavage occurred under conditions where the tumor showed regression to 30–40% of their original size (Fig. 4B)Citation . The same molecular weight bands reactive with the secondary antibody alone (anti-mouse IgG) in SW480 xenografts (Fig. 3C)Citation were observed in VRC5 xenografts. Apparently, the Mr 116,000 and 90,000 PARP fragments appear to be the main fragments generated by treatment with the Topo I inhibitors. An Mr 50,000 fragment was observed in some samples independent of treatment. Because the later observation occur in both treated and untreated tumors, it may represent some degree of spontaneous necrosis, as discussed below.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of TPT on SW480 xenografts. A, SW480 xenograft growth rate after treatment with 1.25, 2.5, or 5 mg/kg TPT for 5 consecutive days. Tumor volumes were measured every other day, and volume was estimated as described in "Materials and Methods." Cleavage of PARP measured by Western blotting in xenograft samples from the same experiment. B, SW480 xenograft growth rate after treatment with 10 or 40 mg/kg CPT-11 for 5 consecutive days. Cleavage of PARP in SW480 xenografts from CPT-11-treated animals (24 h after a 5-consecutive-day cycle) measured by Western blotting. C, immunoblot showing the entire molecular weight range to assess the presence of smaller PARP fragments typical of necrosis. Control with secondary antibody alone was included.

 
PARP Cleavage in Colon Cancer Biopsies from Patients Treated with CPT-11.
Pre- and posttreatment samples from patients treated with CPT-11 were subjected to analysis by Western blotting to detect cleavage of PARP as described in "Materials and Methods." Fig. 5ACitation shows cleavage of PARP in control (C) and treated (T) samples, where C represents samples obtained immediately before the start of treatment and T represents samples from the same patient 24 h after initiation of treatment. Various levels of PARP cleavage were observed, from undetectable PARP cleavage in patient number 1, slight cleavage after treatment in patients, numbers 2 and 3, and marked increase in PARP cleavage in patient number 4. Fig. 5BCitation shows the entire molecular weight range of an immunoblot from patient 4 to assess the presence of PARP cleavage fragments typical of necrosis. The same major bands (Mr 66,000–75,000 and 50,000) reactive with the secondary antibody alone (anti-mouse IgG) in SW480 and VRC5 xenografts (Figs. 3CCitation and 4CCitation ) were also observed but at a much lower intensity because longer exposure time with the hyperfilm was required to reach similar intensity. These results clearly demonstrate the feasibility of detecting PARP cleavage in human tumors samples 24 h after chemotherapy with Topo I inhibitor. Additional studies will be required to determine the association between levels of PARP cleavage and clinical response to treatment.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of TPT or CPT-11 in VRC5 colon cancer xenografts. A, growth rate expressed in tumor volumes (mm3) as a function of time. Xenografts were measured every other day, and tumor volume was estimated as described in "Materials and Methods." B, relative growth rate expressed as arbitrary units considering size of tumors at beginning of treatment as one (1) . PARP cleavage measured by Western blotting in VRC5 xenografts after treatment with 2.5 mg/kg TPT or 20 mg/kg CPT-11 24 h after cycles 2 and 3. C, immunoblot showing the entire molecular weight range.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study demonstrates that PARP cleavage occurs in vitro and in vivo in colon cancer responding to treatment with camptothecins. Results in this report confirm that PARP cleavage is a useful marker to assess PCD in colon cancer cell lines in tissue culture conditions. Interestingly, the same cancer cells can respond differently in culture or in vivo, as shown for SW480 and VACO451 colon cancer cells, responding similarly when grown as xenografts in vivo but being among the least and most sensitive, respectively, when grown in tissue culture (Fig. 2)Citation . Although Topo I inhibitors have been shown to be effective chemotherapeutic agents against human colon cancer, their efficacy rate against cells growing in tissue culture or as xenografts in athymic mice is greater than their efficacy against solid colon tumor growth in patients. In fact, the clinical response rate in such patients is estimated at ~7–32%, depending on the agent used, dose, and schedule of administration (34 , 35) . These agents are also capable of producing significant toxicity, especially myelosuppression and diarrhea. It would therefore be useful to have an early predictor for response to Topo I-based chemotherapy to determine whether to continue use of these agents or to stop them to try an alternative regimen.

The demonstrations that Topo I inhibitors induce PCD in colon cancer cells that can be quantitated by PARP cleavage provide the potential basis for early evaluation of response to Topo I inhibitors in vivo. In this study, we show in a series of colon cancer cell lines in vitro that PARP cleavage is proportional to apoptosis induced by Topo I inhibitors. We subsequently show in human colon cancer xenografts growing in athymic mice that PARP cleavage is induced in tumors undergoing stabilization and regression in response to systemic administration of Topo I inhibitor. Both apoptotic and necrotic cell death occur with PARP cleavage; nevertheless, the pattern of cleavage differs (11) . Apoptotic cell death results in PARP fragments of Mr at about 90,000 and 26,000, whereas it has been reported that during necrosis, further cleavage of PARP occurs, and smaller fragments at Mr 50,000, 40,000, and 35,000 can be observed (11) . In our studies, two major bands at Mr 66,000–75,000 and 50,000 and other minor bands at Mr 55,000, 49,000, and 25,000 result from reactivity to anti-IgG (secondary antibody) in tissue samples. The Mr 50,000 band corresponding to IgG fall in the same area where the PARP fragment Mr 50,000 corresponding to necrotic death should be found. Nevertheless, it appears that only the Mr 90,000 fragment can be observed after treatment with Topo I inhibitors in the tumor samples analyzed because little increase in the Mr 50,000 band was observed. Furthermore, in addition to the effect of cell death induced by the Topo I inhibitors, other types of cell death intrinsic to the tumor may occur. Included in this latter type of cell death is necrotic death produced by hypoxia (36) , which may explain the appearance of the Mr 50,000 fragment detected in the control sample of SW480 xenograft shown in Fig. 3CCitation .

The increases in PARP cleavage that occur in tumors that undergo shrinkage in response to Topo I inhibitors appear to be associated with tumor cell death. PARP cleavage occurs as well in tumors, the growth of which are stabilized in response to Topo I inhibitors, although the percentage of PARP cleavage in the stabilized tumors is less than that which occurs in the regressing tumors. This observation suggests that stable tumor size may reflect a balanced process of tumor cell death and tumor cell proliferation. Nonetheless, in both model situations where tumors remain stable or regress, the responses to treatment with Topo I inhibitors were reflected by an increase in PARP cleavage.

In these studies on patients with metastatic colon cancer undergoing therapy with a 90-min infusion of CPT-11, we performed tumor biopsies before and 24 h after the first course of chemotherapy. Although the optimal time after therapy to biopsy human tumors is unclear to show PARP cleavage, we selected the 24-h point because it was more convenient and readily accepted by patients to have the procedure performed as part of a single visit and evaluation process including pretherapy biopsy, therapy, drawing blood samples for pharmacokinetic studies, followed by a 24-h posttherapy CT-guided biopsy. Although it is possible that biopsies at later times might show a greater amount of PARP cleavage, our present results demonstrate that PARP cleavage can be clearly demonstrated at 24 h after therapy in a series of patients undergoing 90-min CPT-11 infusion. The possibility that measurements of apoptosis may be useful to predict therapeutic outcomes has been considered previously (37 , 38) . Our observations provide the basis for a clinical trial to determine whether the PARP cleavage assay can be correlated with standard clinical parameters of chemotherapy response and whether the percentage of PARP cleavage will correlate with the degree and/or duration of clinical response.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Peter J. Houghton from the Department of Molecular Pharmacology at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (Memphis, TN) for the VRC5 colon cancer cell lines.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 These studies were supported by Grants PO1 CA51183, P30 CA43703, UO1 CA63200, KO1 CA77065A1, R21 CA76265, and Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. (support for the Phase II trial). Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine BRB 301A, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-4937. Phone: (216) 368-2825; Fax: (216) 368-1166. Back

3 The abbreviations used are: PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; PCD, programmed cell death; Topo, topoisomerase; TPT, topotecan; CPT-11, irinotecan; FBS, fetal bovine serum; CT, computed tomography. Back

Received 7/ 2/98; revised 12/28/98; accepted 1/ 6/99.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Lautier D., Lagueux J., Thibodeau J., Menard L., Poirier G. G. Molecular and biochemical features of poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism. Mol. Cell. Biochem., 122: 171-193, 1993.[Medline]
  2. Colyer R. A., Burdette K. E., Kidwell W. R. Poly ADP-ribose synthesis and DNA replication in synchronized mouse L-cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 53: 960-966, 1973.[Medline]
  3. Durkacz B. W., Omidiji O., Gray D. A., Shall S. (ADP-ribose)n participates in DNA excision repair. Nature (Lond.), 283: 593-596, 1980.[Medline]
  4. Satoh M. S., Lindahl T. Role of poly(ADP-ribose) formation in DNA repair. Nature (Lond.), 356: 356-358, 1992.[Medline]
  5. Caplan A. I., Rosenberg M. J. Interrelationship between poly(ADP-ribose) syntheis, intracellular NAD levels, and muscle or cartilage differentiation from mesodermal cells of embryonic chick limb. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 72: 1852-1857, 1975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Miwa M., Oda K., Segawa K., Tanaka M., Irie S., Yamaguchi N., Kuchino T., Shiroki K., Shimojo H., Sakura H., Matsushima T., Sugimura T. Cell density-dependent increase in chromatin-associated ADP-ribosyltransferase activity in simian virus 40-transformed cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 181: 313-321, 1977.[Medline]
  7. Jacobson E. L., Meadows R., Measel J. Cell cycle perturbations: DNA damage in the presence of ADP-ribosylation inhibitors. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 6: 711-714, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Masutani M., Nozaki T., Wakabayashi K., Sugimura T. Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in cell cycle checkpoint mechanisms following {gamma}-irradiation. Biochemie, 77: 462-465, 1995.[Medline]
  9. Margolin N., Raybuck S. A., Wilson K. P., Chen W., Fox T., Gu Y., Livingston D. G. Substrate and inhibitor specificity of interleukin-1ß-converting enzyme and related caspases. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 7223-7228, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Van de Craen M., Vandenabeele P., Declercq W., Van den Brande I., Van Loo G., Molemans F., Schotte P., van Criekinge W., Beyaert R., Fiers W. Characterization of seven murine caspase family members. FEBS Lett., 403: 61-69, 1997.[Medline]
  11. Shah G. M., Shah R. G., Poirier G. G. Different cleavage pattern for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase during necrosis and apoptosis in HL-60 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 229: 838-844, 1996.[Medline]
  12. Lazebnik Y. A., Kaufmann S. H., Desnoyers S., Poirier G. G., Earnshaw W. C. Cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by a proteinase with properties like ICE. Nature (Lond.), 371: 346-347, 1994.[Medline]
  13. Kaufmann S. H., Desnoyers S., Ottaviano Y., Davidson N. E., Poirier G. G. Specific proteolytic cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase: an early marker of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res., 53: 3976-3985, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Nicholson D. W., Ali A., Thornberry N. A., Vaillancourt J. P., Ding C. K., Gallant M., Gareau Y., Griffin P. R., Labelle M., Lazebnik Y. A., Munday N. A., Raju S. M., Smulson M. E., Yamin T-T., Yu V. L., Miller D. K. Identification and inhibition of the ICE/CED-3 protease necessary for mammalian apoptosis. Nature (Lond.), 376: 37-43, 1995.[Medline]
  15. Whitacre C. M., Berger N. A. Factors affecting topotecan-induced programmed cell death: adhesion protects cells from apoptosis and impairs cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Cancer Res., 57: 2157-2163, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. He J., Whitacre C. M., Xue L., Berger N. A., Oleinick N. L. Protease activation and cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase: an integral part of apoptosis in response to photodynamic treatment. Cancer Res., 58: 940-946, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wall M. E., Wani M. C. Camptothecin and Taxol. Discovery to Clinic–Thirteenth Bruce F. Cain Memorial Award Lecture. Cancer Res., 55: 753-760, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Sinha B. K. Topoisomerase inhibitors. A review of their therapeutic potential in cancer. Drugs, 49: 11-19, 1995.[Medline]
  19. Rothenberg M. L., Kuhn J. G., Burris H. A., III., Nelson J., Eckardt J. R., Tristan-Morales M., Hilsenbeck S. G., Weiss G. R., Smith L. S., Rodriguez G. I., Rock M. K., Von Hoff D. D. Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of weekly CPT-11. J. Clin. Oncol., 11: 2194-2204, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Slichenmeyer W. J., Rowinsky E. K., Donehower R. C., Kaufmann S. H. The current status of camptothecin analogues as antitumor agents. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 85: 271-291, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Shimada W., Yoshino M., Wakui A., Nakao I., Fatatsuki K., Sakata Y., Kambe M., Toguchi T., Ogawa N., the Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group Phase II study of CPT-11, a new camptothecin derivative in metastatic colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 11: 909-913, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Pitot H. C., Wender D., O’Connell M. J., Wieand H. S., Mailliard J. A. A phase II trial of CPT-11 (Irinotecan) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) study. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 13: 197 1994.
  23. Rothenberg M. L., Eckardt J. R., Kuhn J. G., Burris H. A., III., Nelson J., Hilsenbeck S. G., Rodriguez G. I., Thurman A. M., Smith L. S., Eckhardt S. G., Weiss G. R., Elfring G. L., Rinaldi D. A., Schaaf L. J., Von-Hoff D. D. Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with progressive or rapidly recurrent colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 14: 1128-1135, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rougier P., Bugat R., Douillard J. Y., Culine S., Suc E., Brunet P., Becouarn Y., Ychou M., Marty M., Extra J. M., Bonneterre J., Adenis A., Burki F., Mousseau M., Herait P., Mahjoubi M. Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol., 15: 251-260, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Whitacre C. M., Zborowska E., Gordon N. H., Mackay W., Berger N. A. Topotecan increases topoisomerase II{alpha} levels and sensitivity to treatment with etoposide in schedule-dependent process. Cancer Res., 57: 1425-1428, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hertzberg R. P., Caranfa M. J., Hecht S. M. On the mechanism of topoisomerase I inhibition: evidence for binding to an enzyme-DNA complex. Biochemistry, 28: 4629-4638, 1989.[Medline]
  27. McBain J. A., Weese J. L., Meisner L. F., Wolberg W. H., Willson J. K. V. Establishment and characterization of human colorectal cancer cell lines. Cancer Res., 44: 5813-5821, 1984.
  28. Houghton P. J., Cheshire P. J., Hallman J. D., II., Lutz L., Friedman H. S., Danks M. K., Houghton J. A. Efficacy of topoisomerase I inhibitors, topotecan and irinotecan, administered at low dose levels in protracted schedules to mice bearing xenografts of human tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 36: 393-403, 1995.[Medline]
  29. McConkey D. J., Hartzell P., Duddy S. K., Hakansson H., Orrenius S. 2, 3, 7, 8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin kills immature thymocytes by Ca2+-mediated endonuclease activation. Science (Washington DC), 242: 256-259, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Negri C., Bernardi R., Braghetti A., Astaldi Ricotti G. C. B., Scovassi A. I. The effect of the chemotherapeutic drug VP-16 on poly(ADP-ribosylation) in apoptotic HeLa cells. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 14: 2559-2564, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. He D., Mu Z-M., Le X., Hsieh J-T., Pong R-C., Chung L. W. K. Adenovirus-mediated expression of PML suppresses growth and tumorigenicity of prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res., 57: 1868-1872, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (Lond.), 227: 680-685, 1970.[Medline]
  33. Ranjit G. B., Cheng M-F., Mackay W., Whitacre C. M., Berger J. S., Berger N. A. Poly(adenosine diphosphoribose) polymerase in peripheral blood leukocytes from normal donors and patients with malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res., 1: 223-234, 1995.[Abstract]
  34. Creemers G. J., Wanders J., Gamucci T., Vallentin S., Dirix L. Y., Schoffski P., Hudson I., Verweij J. Topotecan in colorectal cancer: a phase II study of the EORTC early clinical trials group. Ann. Oncol., 6: 844-846, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Armand J. P., Ducreaux M., Mahjoubi M., Abigerges D., Bugat R., Chabot G., Herait P., de Forni M., Rougier P. CPT-11 (irinotecan) in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Cancer, 31A: 1283-1287, 1995.
  36. Brown J. M., Giaccia A. J. The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy. Cancer Res., 58: 1408-1416, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Lamb J. R., Friend S. H. Which guesstimate is the best guesstimate? Predicting chemotherapeutic outcomes. Nat. Med., 3: 962-963, 1997.[Medline]
  38. Wheeler J. A., Stephens L. C., Tornos C., Eifel P. J., Ang K. K., Milas L., Allen P. K., Meyn R. E. ASTRO research fellowship: apoptosis as a predictor of tumor response to radiation in stage IB cervical carcinoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 32: 1487-1493, 1995.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C.-C. Kuo, J.-F. Liu, and J.-Y. Chang
DNA Repair Enzyme, O6-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase, Modulates Cytotoxicity of Camptothecin-Derived Topoisomerase I Inhibitors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 946 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
T. Ikegami, Y. Matsuzaki, M. Al Rashid, S. Ceryak, Y. Zhang, and B. Bouscarel
Enhancement of DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor-induced apoptosis by ursodeoxycholic acid
Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2006; 5(1): 68 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. P. Hu, S. Venkateswarlu, N. Sergina, G. Howell, P. St. Clair, L. E. Humphrey, W. Li, J. Hauser, E. Zborowska, J. K. V. Willson, et al.
Reorganization of ErbB Family and Cell Survival Signaling after Knock-down of ErbB2 in Colon Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., July 22, 2005; 280(29): 27383 - 27392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
R. Bottino, A.N. Balamurugan, H. Tse, C. Thirunavukkarasu, X. Ge, J. Profozich, M. Milton, A. Ziegenfuss, M. Trucco, and J. D. Piganelli
Response of Human Islets to Isolation Stress and the Effect of Antioxidant Treatment
Diabetes, October 1, 2004; 53(10): 2559 - 2568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Cao, F. A. Durrani, and Y. M. Rustum
Selective Modulation of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Anticancer Drugs by Selenium Containing Compounds against Human Tumor Xenografts
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 10(7): 2561 - 2569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
R. L. Hayward, J. S. Macpherson, J. Cummings, B. P. Monia, J. F. Smyth, and D. I. Jodrell
Enhanced oxaliplatin-induced apoptosis following antisense Bcl-xl down-regulation is p53 and Bax dependent: Genetic evidence for specificity of the antisense effect
Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2004; 3(2): 169 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. L. Hayward, J. S. Macpherson, J. Cummings, B. P. Monia, J. F. Smyth, and D. I. Jodrell
Antisense Bcl-xl Down-Regulation Switches the Response to Topoisomerase I Inhibition from Senescence to Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer Cells, Enhancing Global Cytotoxicity
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 9(7): 2856 - 2865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
U. Wenzel, S. Kuntz, M. D. Brendel, and H. Daniel
Dietary Flavone Is a Potent Apoptosis Inducer in Human Colon Carcinoma Cells
Cancer Res., July 1, 2000; 60(14): 3823 - 3831.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. M. Whitacre, D. K. Feyes, T. Satoh, J. Grossmann, J. W. Mulvihill, H. Mukhtar, and N. L. Oleinick
Photodynamic Therapy with the Phthalocyanine Photosensitizer Pc 4 of SW480 Human Colon Cancer Xenografts in Athymic Mice
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2000; 6(5): 2021 - 2027.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitacre, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitacre, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, N. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online