
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 [E. R. S., M. N., M. H.], and Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111 [J. C. W., A. K-S., S. L.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although VEGF and MVD have documented importance in both the development and progression of tumors in multiple models (6) , their roles in HNSCC carcinogenesis are not clear. In other tumor systems, it seems that the timing (early versus late in tumor development and progression) of increased expression of VEGF is tumor-specific. In the breast [in which increased VEGF expression is seen in ductal CIS (9) ], in the ovary [in which increased expression has been identified in borderline tumors (10) ], and in the vulva [in which stage III vulval intraepithelial neoplasias show increased expression (11) ], VEGF seems to be up-regulated before tumor invasion. In other tumor types, including colon carcinomas [in which increased VEGF expression is associated with the metastatic phenotype (12) ] and prostate cancer [in which enhanced expression is associated with invasive carcinoma (13) ], VEGF up-regulation seems to occur later in progression.
VEGF can be constitutively expressed by human tumors, or it can be induced by other growth factors and cytokines including TGF-
, epidermal growth factor, and phorbol esters (14)
. Changes in environmental conditions such as episodes of hypoxia seem to be significant for VEGF induction (15)
. Thus, expression of VEGF may depend on a variety of endogenous and exogenous factors that can vary greatly during tumor progression. Studies in non-SCC lesions have demonstrated a direct correlation between VEGF expression and MVD (16)
, which suggests that VEGF is the predominant growth factor for tumor vascularization. High MVD is associated with increasing tumor aggressiveness as demonstrated by Weidner et al. (2)
, who found a nearly linear relationship between microvessel counts and metastatic potential. However, this close relationship between MVD and metastatic potential has not been detected universally in human tumors (17)
, nor do all human tumors demonstrate increased expression of VEGF. These differences in observations may reflect: (a) high tumor vascularization in dysplasia or biologically early malignancy, leading to insignificant increases in VEGF with progression; (b) inconsistency of VEGF expression because hypoxia may occur only intermittently, with the tumors removed at times of low VEGF expression; or (c) changes in the microenvironment that lead to decreased expression of VEGF-inducing growth factors and cytokines.
In the present study, we evaluated VEGF expression and MVD in head and neck epithelial lesions containing cysts, dysplasia, CIS, early and advanced SCC (LNM) and in cell lines representing human precancerous, primary and metastatic cancer, and metastatic stages. VEGF expression generally increased with progression, and the most aggressive lesions showed the highest expression levels. These findings suggest a role for VEGF in HNSCC that drives the progression of HNSCC toward an invasive and aggressive phenotype.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Tumors
Monolayer cells at 7080% confluence were trypsinized and counted, and 2 x 106 cells in 50 µl of culture medium were injected s.c. in the dorsum of SCID mice. Each group of five mice was monitored twice weekly for the development of tumors. Mice were killed when tumors reached a minimum diameter of 5 mm, or if no tumor was observed at 100 days after tumor cell injection. Tumors were excised, fixed overnight in 10% neutral buffered formalin, and embedded in paraffin.
RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analysis
RNA was isolated from epidermal keratinocytes and cell lines using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturers instructions. Total RNA concentration was determined based on absorbance. Total RNA (15 µg) from each specimen was loaded onto 1.2% agarose-formaldehyde gels containing 10 ng/ml ethidium bromide, subjected to denaturing electrophoresis, transferred to Hybond-N+ nylon membranes (Amersham Life Science, Arlington Heights, IL), and prehybridized in 6x SSC, 2x Denhardts solution, and 0.5% SDS. Membranes were probed with an [
-32P]dATP-labeled fragment containing the entire open reading frame of the human VEGF gene. After washing, blots were exposed to Kodak X-OMAT AR film with an intensifying screen at -80°C.
Protein Isolation and Western Blot Analysis
Cell cultures grown to 7080% confluence were lysed with an SDS-based single lysis buffer. The lysate was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm, and the supernatant was collected. Total protein concentration of the soluble cell extract was determined using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Reagent Kit (Rockford, IL). Total protein (100 µg) of each sample was labeled in the presence of SDS before the addition of 2-mercaptoethanol and applied to a discontinuous 10% polyacrylamide gel for electrophoretic separation. Proteins were then electrophoretically transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, which was placed in blocking solution (5% nonfat dry milk), probed with VEGF-specific antibody (1:200 mouse monoclonal Ab-3, Calbiochem, Cambridge, MA) followed by a phosphatase-conjugated goat antimouse IgG (1:1000; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA), and washed. The substrates 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate and nitroblue tetrazolium were added for signal detection.
Quantitation of Secreted VEGF
The concentration of VEGF protein in supernatants that were collected 3 days after culture medium change of 1.0 x 105 immortalized cells was determined. Normal keratinocyte medium was not collected because it contains: (a) growth factors not present in the SCC medium that stimulates VEGF (18)
; and (b) a relatively high percentage of senescent keratinocytes whose cell membranes are degrading, which results in the measurement of cellular VEGF in addition to secreted VEGF. A VEGF ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was used to measure VEGF protein levels in the SCC supernatants according to the manufacturers instructions.
Immunohistochemistry
Paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed normal epithelium, dysplasias, CIS, invasive SCCs, LNM from primary HNSCC, and tumors from SCC cell lines in SCID mice were cut in 5-µm-thick sections and placed on poly-l-lysine-coated glass slides. After boiling with distilled water for 10 min, slides were incubated with VEGF antibody Ab-3 (1:50). Reactions were detected using the Super Sensitive detection system with the substrate Fast Red (Biogenex, San Ramon, CA); levamisole was added to the substrate to block endogenous alkaline phosphatase activity. Skeletal muscle in the section served as a positive control, and a corresponding tissue section without primary antibody Ab-3 served as a negative control.
To determine MVD, slides were incubated sequentially with a mouse monoclonal antibody to Factor VIII-related antigen (Dako Corp., Carpinteria, CA), a horse antimouse IgG (1:200 dilution; Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA), and avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (1:25 dilution; Vector Labs). The chromagen 3'3'-diaminobenzidine was used to visualize antibody binding, and microvessels were counted as described below.
Each evaluation of VEGF and Factor VIII was performed simultaneously and agreed upon by at least two of the investigators (E. R. S., J. C. W., and A. K-S.) using a double-headed light microscope. VEGF staining was scored as 0 = none; 1 = weak; 2 = moderate; or 3 = intense.
Image Cytometric Quantitation of Factor VIII Immunostain
In normal epithelium and preinvasive lesions, the dermis below the epithelial lesion was evaluated. For invasive lesions, peritumoral vessels were counted. After the area of interest was identified, individual microvessels were counted in 35 (as available for any given lesion) noncontiguous, randomly selected fields (x200) using a computerized image analyzer (Roche Pathology Work Station; 0.104 mm2 per field). Any brown-staining endothelial cell or endothelial cell cluster that was clearly separate from adjacent microvessels, tumor cells, and other connective-tissue elements was considered a single, countable microvessel. Vessel lumens, although usually present, were not necessary in defining a structure as a microvessel, and red cells were not used to define a vessel lumen. All of the counts were performed simultaneously and in agreement by two investigators (J. C. W. and A. K-S.) without knowledge of the patients diagnosis. MVD was expressed as number of microvessels per mm2. Because MVD is often heterogeneous among tumors, average MVD was determined after the lowest and highest counts were omitted; this gave values more representative of the histology as a whole and improved reproducibility.
Statistical Analysis
VEGF Expression in Clinical Specimens.
Fishers exact test (two-sided) was used to test the hypothesis that VEGF immunoreactivity increased with increasing lesion severity. Specimens with Stage I/II cancer did not have different staining intensity than specimens with normal histology, whereas Stage III/IV specimens stained more intensely for VEGF (P = 0.01). There was not a significant difference identified between lesions with moderate dysplasia versus CIS, between moderate dysplasia versus Stage I/II invasive cancer, or between moderate dysplasia and CIS versus Stage I/II invasive cancer. The difference between moderate dysplasia and CIS versus invasive cancer (Stage I-IV) was marginally significant (P = 0.05), whereas specimens with Stage III/IV cancer had significantly higher staining intensity (P = 0.0001) than specimens containing moderate dysplasia and CIS. VEGF levels in histologically normal mucosa adjacent to lesions did not differ from lesion levels for samples taken for either moderate dysplasia or CIS. However, VEGF level in Stage I/II lesions marginally exceeded that in adjacent mucosa (P = 0.05) and significantly exceeded adjacent mucosa in Stage III/IV lesions (P = 0.002).
VEGF Expression in Experimental Tumors.
Cells with VEGF intensity of 2 are less aggressive than those with VEGF intensity of 3. In mice with 2 million cell innocula, neither mouse with a VEGF intensity of 2 developed a tumor within the 100-day observation period. Each of the 4 mice with a 2-million-cell innocula with VEGF intensities of 3 developed a tumor within the observation period. We ranked the number of days until tumor could be observed. The VEGF 2 mice thus received ranks 5 and 6, whereas the VEGF 3 mice received ranks 1, 2, 3, and 4. Thus, the rank sum of VEGF 2 mice in this group is 5 + 6 = 11. On the hypothesis that the VEGF 2 mouse ranks are chosen randomly from the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, the chance of this observation or one more extreme (there are none more extreme) is 1/15. This result is not statistically significant in its own right but was combined with our results from 5 mice inoculated with 10 million cells.
As Table 2
shows, one VEGF 2 mouse in the 10-million-cell category did not develop a tumor within the 100-day period. The other mouse did develop a tumor at 89 days. All of the 3 VEGF 3 mice in this group developed a tumor within 14 days of inoculation. Again, ranks assigned to the VEGF 2 mice would be 4 and 5. VEGF 3 mice are assigned ranks 1, 2, and 3. Thus, the rank sum of the VEGF 2 mice in this group is 4 + 5 = 9, again the most extreme that is possible for this group. The chance of this rank sum, assuming random assignment, is 1/10.
|
MVD.
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine the significance of increased MVD comparing histologically abnormal versus adjacent normal epithelium and then comparing lesion subtypes (normal epithelium, dysplasias, early SCCs, advanced SCCs, LNM, and tumors formed in SCID mice). Lesions with CIS had a higher MVD (P = 0.04) than lesions with less severe dysplasia or than normal epithelium. Fishers exact test was used to evaluate the association between the rate of formation of experimental tumors and MVD. The association was significant (P = 0.003).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
MVD and Invasive Potential
Comparison of MVD in dysplasia versus CIS revealed a significantly increased MVD (P = 0.04) in CIS (median MVD, 173 vessels/mm2) compared with moderate-severe dysplasia (median MVD, 112 vessels/mm2) and normal epithelium (median MVD, 88 vessels/mm2; Fig. 4
). On the other hand, there was no association between peritumoral MVD and disease progression, with no significant difference in MVD of stage I and II lesions (median MVD 140, vessels/mm2) versus stage III and IV lesions (median MVD, 123 vessels/mm2; Fig. 4
). Preinvasive lesions were not compared with invasive lesions because the latter were evaluated for peritumoral vessels, regardless of their relationship to the epithelium. An example of MVD staining in four different specimens is indicated in Fig. 5
.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Angiogenesis can be measured in a variety of ways, including the measurement of MVD and the expression of growth factors known to be important in stimulating angiogenesis, including bFGF, platelet-derived growth factor, and VEGF. Among the various growth factors thought to be important in the angiogenic process, VEGF is generally regarded as the most likely candidate for the induction of tumor growth because it is a soluble secreted endothelial cell mitogen and its receptor (KDR) is selectively expressed by activated endothelium (20) . In experimental tumors, administration of anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody decreased the MVD and suppressed tumor growth (21) .
Recent reports document the expression of VEGF both in HNSCC cell lines (22 , 23) and in clinical specimens (24, 25, 26, 27) . What is not clear from these reports is the role of VEGF in either experimental or clinical HNSCC carcinogenesis. In one of the reports (27) , subjects with normal mucosa, dysplasia, and invasive cancer were evaluated, but neither the degree of dysplasia (moderate, severe, or CIS) nor the stage of the invasive SCC was clear. Tumor metastases were apparently not evaluated. The authors concluded that VEGF expression is increased in high-grade dysplasia and SCC compared with normal epithelium, although no statistical support was described. A separate report using a polyclonal antibody to VEGF (25) documents an association of VEGF expression with LNM compared with nonmetastatic SCC.
We considered the use of image analysis to quantitate VEGF immunostain but elected not to perform the procedure for a variety of reasons. First, image analysis has a number of problems that are difficult to circumvent. The problems include: (a) only a portion of a cell may be on a slide because of the thickness of the tissue section. This will affect the intensity scoring; (b) even if sections from tissue sections are cut at the same setting on the same microtome, the thickness of the sections can vary, potentially altering intensity scoring. This results in loss of precision in image analysis measurements that could neutralize its perceived advantages over the semi-quantitative immunostain method; (c) many tumor cells are nonspherical and vary in size and shape, which limits the ability to quantitate immunostain intensity (28) ; (d) staining heterogeneityeither true or inducedduring tissue fixation and processing requires the subjective selection of fields, leads to inter-observer variability, and limits the reproducibility of image analysis results (29) ; and (e) although image analysis is an accepted method to determine the DNA content within a cell, quantitation of protein content using image analysis is less well accepted.
Although a minority of subjects received preoperative chemoradiation therapy, this treatment did not significantly influence VEGF expression. VEGF staining intensity was scored as 1 and 1, respectively, for the two Stage I/II specimens that had received prior treatment. The median score for all of the Stage I/II tumors was 1. VEGF intensity was 2 for the Stage III/IV specimen that had received prior treatment, compared with a median of 3 for the group.
MVD in invasive primary carcinomas has shown promise as a reliable prognostic marker in a number of tumor systems, including both node-positive and node-negative breast cancer (30) . A variety of markers have been used to measure MVD. One of the more common, Factor VIII-related antigen, is expressed mainly on large blood vessels and also on the endothelial cells of lymph vessels (31) . This staining of lymph vessels may be an advantage when evaluating HNSCC, given the propensity of these tumors to metastasize through lymphatics. Another marker, platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule, has the reported advantage of staining a higher number of small blood vessels as compared with Factor VIII (32) . However, neither of these two markers is specific for tumor-stimulated blood vessels. An endothelial cell proliferation antigen, endoglin, may prove more specific for tumor-stimulated blood vessel growth (33) .
In our normal epithelium and preinvasive lesions, stromal vessels deep in the basement membrane below the preinvasive lesion were measured. On the other hand, peritumoral vessels were counted in our tissue sections containing HNSCC. Thus, comparison of preinvasive with invasive lesions did not seem possible, and only normal versus dysplasia versus CIS and only early versus advanced SCC were compared. MVD was higher (P = 0.04) in CIS compared with dysplasia and normal mucosa (Fig. 4)
. Although there was no association between peritumoral MVD and disease stage, the effects of earlier treatment may have influenced MVD, especially in the advanced lesions. Radiation therapy, for example, is known to reduce the network of small blood vessels in tissue, leading to ischemia, atrophy, and occasionally necrosis (34)
. Unfortunately, complete clinical information is not available for most of the advanced lesions, but we do know that the preinvasive and early invasive lesions were not treated with radiation or chemotherapy before resection. This is consistent with the findings of Inoue et al. (25)
that MVD is not a prognostic marker in oral SCC. On the other hand, we found a direct association between MVD and experimental SCC tumor formation (Table 2)
. Two prior studies evaluating experimental tumors of different origin (20
, 35) reported similar findings.
We observed an increase in MVD in preinvasive lesions without a concomitant increase in VEGF, which was observed only much later in squamous cell carcinogenesis. It is well known that the induction of angiogenesis frequently precedes the formation of malignant tumors (36) , which suggests that angiogenesis may be rate-limiting not only for tumor progression but also for the onset of malignancy. Skobe et al. (37) , who analyzed the role of VEGF in both initiating and sustaining angiogenesis in malignant skin keratinocytes, demonstrated that, during the first 2 weeks after grafting benign and malignant variants of HaCaT cells on a collagen matrix, both types of cells express similar levels of VEGF mRNA. On the other hand, increased VEGF mRNA was detected 26 weeks after grafting in the more advanced lesions. The authors concluded that VEGF is crucial in sustaining, but not initiating, angiogenesis by malignant squamous cells, and that other angiogenic factor(s) mediates early-stage tumor angiogenesis. Both our clinical and our experimental data support this hypothesis.
In summary, VEGF expression seems to be associated with progression to a more aggressive phenotype both in experimental and in clinical systems involving HNSCC, with clinical evidence of lymphatic spread and with more rapid development of tumors in immunodeficient mice. Up-regulation of MVD seems to occur early in HNSCC carcinogenesis, although this observation awaits confirmation in a larger study.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by NIH Grants DE-00380, CA-25874, and CA-47159. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at The Wistar Institute, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Phone: (215) 898-3950; Fax: (215) 898-0980; E-mail: herlynm{at}wista.wistar.upenn.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; HNSCC, head and neck SCC; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; MVD, microvessel density; SCID, severe combined immunodeficiency disease; LNM, lymph node metastasis/metastases; CIS, carcinoma(s) in situ; TGF, transforming growth factor; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. ![]()
Received 5/ 4/98; revised 9/ 2/98; accepted 10/ 8/98.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Cat, D. Stuhlmann, H. Steinbrenner, L. Alili, O. Holtkotter, H. Sies, and P. Brenneisen Enhancement of tumor invasion depends on transdifferentiation of skin fibroblasts mediated by reactive oxygen species J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2006; 119(13): 2727 - 2738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-T. Zhou, Y. Yang, and J.-P. Ge The preventive effect of salvianolic acid B on malignant transformation of DMBA-induced oral premalignant lesion in hamsters Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2006; 27(4): 826 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. W. Park, M. N. Younes, S. A. Jasser, O. G. Yigitbasi, G. Zhou, C. D. Bucana, B. N. Bekele, and J. N. Myers AEE788, a Dual Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Inhibitor, Induces Endothelial Cell Apoptosis in Human Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Xenografts in Nude Mice Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1963 - 1973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Kyzas, I. W. Cunha, and J. P.A. Ioannidis Prognostic Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Immunohistochemical Expression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2005; 11(4): 1434 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yu, P. M. Weinberger, B. G. Haffty, C. Sasaki, C. Zerillo, J. Joe, D. Kowalski, J. Dziura, R. L. Camp, D. L. Rimm, et al. Cyclin D1 Is a Valuable Prognostic Marker in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 11(3): 1160 - 1166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. de Cicco, J. C. Watson, D. E. Bassi, S. Litwin, and A. J. Klein-Szanto Simultaneous Expression of Furin and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Human Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 10(13): 4480 - 4488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Talbot, P. O-charoenrat, I. S. Sarkaria, R. Ghossein, P. Reddy, I. Ngai, C. N. Cordeiro, R. J. Wong, M. G. Kris, V. W. Rusch, et al. Squamous Cell Carcinoma Related Oncogene Regulates Angiogenesis through Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2004; 11(5): 530 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Laitakari, V Nayha, and F Stenback Size, shape, structure, and direction of angiogenesis in laryngeal tumour development J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2004; 57(4): 394 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Nayha, J. Laitakari, and F. Stenback Stage-Dependent Expression of an Angiogenic Agent and Vascular Organization in Experimental Skin Tumor Development Toxicol Pathol, August 1, 2003; 31(5): 539 - 548. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Yoo, M. P. Piechocki, J. F. Ensley, T. Nguyen, J. Oliver, H. Meng, D. Kewson, T. Y. Shibuya, F. Lonardo, and M. A. Tainsky Docetaxel Induced Gene Expression Patterns in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using cDNA Microarray and PowerBlot Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2002; 8(12): 3910 - 3921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Hui, A. T. C. Chan, F. Pezzella, H. Turley, K.-F. To, T. C. W. Poon, B. Zee, F. Mo, P. M. L. Teo, D. P. Huang, et al. Coexpression of Hypoxia-inducible Factors 1{alpha} and 2{alpha}, Carbonic Anhydrase IX, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Relationship to Survival Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 8(8): 2595 - 2604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Santini, B. Vincenzi, G. Avvisati, G. Dicuonzo, F. Battistoni, M. Gavasci, A. Salerno, V. Denaro, and G. Tonini Pamidronate Induces Modifications of Circulating Angiogenetic Factors in Cancer Patients Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 8(5): 1080 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Jaeckel, S. Raja, J. Tan, S. K. Das, S. K. Dey, D. A. Girod, T. T. Tsue, and T. R. Sanford Correlation of Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {delta} With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, October 1, 2001; 127(10): 1253 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Yoo, J. Washington, M. Piechocki, J. Ensley, T. Shibuya, D. Oda, and W.-Z. Wei Progression of Head and Neck Cancer in an In Vitro Model Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, November 1, 2000; 126(11): 1313 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ueno, M. Toi, H. Saji, M. Muta, H. Bando, K. Kuroi, M. Koike, H. Inadera, and K. Matsushima Significance of Macrophage Chemoattractant Protein-1 in Macrophage Recruitment, Angiogenesis, and Survival in Human Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2000; 6(8): 3282 - 3289. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME |