| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Division of Diagnostic Imaging [C. L., S. K., D-F. Y., C. C., S. W.] and Departments of Cancer Biology [J. E. P.] and Experimental Radiation Oncology [L. M., N. R. H.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Conjugation of chemotherapeutic agents to water-soluble macromolecular carriers is an alternative approach to improving the solubility of the agents. In addition, polymer-drug conjugates may provide desirable pharmacokinetics and an improved therapeutic index (6) . We have recently reported a highly water-soluble polymer-paclitaxel conjugate that uses PG4 as the polymeric carrier (7) . PG-TXL has water solubility of 20 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/ml, representing an 80,000-fold improvement in water solubility compared with paclitaxel. The biological characteristics of PG-TXL in mice and rats are notable: administration of a single dose produces complete regression of well-established murine ovarian OCa-1 and rat breast 13762F tumors. Previous studies have shown that the antitumor activity of paclitaxel is dependent on tumor type (8) . The purpose of the study reported here was to test whether the antitumor efficacy of PG-TXL also depends on tumor type.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
Female C3Hf/Kam mice (2530 g) were bred and maintained in a specific pathogen-free mouse colony in the Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology. Female nude mice (nu/nu; 1822 g; 68 weeks of age) were purchased from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN). All experiments involving animals were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Syngeneic Murine Tumors
Solid tumors were generated in the muscle of the right legs of C3Hf/Kam mice by inoculation of 5 x 105 viable tumor cells in suspension. The following tumors were studied: mammary carcinomas (MCa-4 and MCa-35); a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCa-1); and a soft-tissue sarcoma (FSa-II). All tumors, originally developed spontaneously, were syngeneic to this strain of mouse. MCa-4 and MCa-35 are responsive to paclitaxel treatment, and HCa-1 and FSa-II are resistant to paclitaxel treatment (8)
.
The antitumor effects of PG-TXL and paclitaxel were determined by their ability to delay tumor growth. When the tumors had grown to 400600 mm3, mice were randomly allocated into groups, with each group typically consisting of five mice. A single dose of paclitaxel ranging from 4080 mg/kg or PG-TXL at an equivalent paclitaxel dose of 40160 mg/kg (total dose of PG-TXL of 200800 mg/kg) was given i.v. The MTDs of paclitaxel and PG-TXL in C3Hf/Kam mice have been determined previously to be 80 mg/kg and 160 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg, respectively (7) . Tumor growth was determined daily by measuring three orthogonal tumor diameters. Tumor volume was calculated according to the formula (A x B x C)/2. The effect of treatment on tumor growth was expressed as the AGD, defined as the time in days for tumors in the treated groups to grow from 500 mm3 to 2000 mm3 minus the time in days for tumors in the control saline-treated group to grow from 500 mm3 to 2000 mm3. Mice with HCa-1 and FSa-II tumors were also weighed daily to estimate the effect of treatment on tumor burden.
Human Tumor Xenografts
SKOV3ip1 Ovarian Tumor.
Nude mice received i.p. injections of 1 x 106 SKOV3ip1 human ovarian cancer cells. On day 8 after tumor injection, mice were treated i.v. with PG alone (control), paclitaxel, or PG-TXL. PG was given at a dose of 600 mg/kg. Paclitaxel was given at a dose of 60 mg/kg. PG-TXL was given as a saline solution at equivalent paclitaxel doses of 60 and 120 mg/kg. Mice were sacrificed when they became moribund because of tumor burden or when they had weight loss of
25%. The experiment was terminated on day 100. Mice sacrificed on day 100 were censored from the survival analysis and median survival calculations. In a separate experiment, PG-TXL at a dose of 120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg was given at 7-day intervals for a total of three injections starting on day 5 after tumor inoculation.
MDA-MB-435 Breast Tumor.
Nude mice were anesthetized with methoxyflurane inhalation, and a small incision was made in the skin over the lateral thorax. The fat pad was exposed, and MDA-MB-435Lung2 cells (a variant of the MDA-MB-435 human breast cancer cell line, 2 x 106 cells in 0.1 ml PBS) were injected. The incision was closed with surgical clips, and mice were allowed to recover. When the tumors reached 5 mm in mean diameter (about 27 days after tumor injection), mice received i.v. injections of each drug. Tumors were measured weekly using calipers. Tumors that reached 1.5 cm in diameter were removed surgically. On day 120, all mice were sacrificed, and remaining tumors were removed and weighed. The mice were examined for metastases, and the lungs were processed for histological examination, with single sections of the organs scored for the presence of micrometastases. In another experiment, animals received three injections of PG-TXL, the first given when the tumors reached 5 mm in diameter and the others given at 14-day intervals after that.
Data Analysis
Mean differences in the tumor growth delay (number of days required to grow from 500 mm3 to 2000 mm3) were analyzed by Students t test. Survival was analyzed using the SAS software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), and differences in median survival between groups were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test.
RESULTS
Murine Tumors
The antitumor effect of PG-TXL against murine tumors was considerably better than that of paclitaxel (Figs. 1
2
3
4)
. However, the magnitude of antitumor activity of PG-TXL varied considerably among tumor types.
|
|
|
|
MCa-35 tumor has been shown previously to be nonresponsive to i.v. injection of paclitaxel at 40 mg/kg (8)
. However, in MCa-35 tumor, paclitaxel at a dose of 80 mg/kg induced a small yet significant growth delay compared with growth in Cremophor-treated controls (P = 0.0005; Fig. 2A
). PG-TXL at the MTD of 160 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg induced a highly significant growth delay compared with growth in saline-treated controls (P < 0.0001). The AGD induced by PG-TXL at 160 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg was also significantly higher than the AGD induced by paclitaxel at its MTD of 80 mg/kg (16 days versus 7 days; P < 0.05).
Hepatocarcinoma and Sarcoma.
For HCa-1 tumor, there was no apparent tumor growth delay in the paclitaxel-treated groups. However, statistically significant growth delay was observed with PG-TXL treatment (Fig. 3B)
. A physical combination of PG and paclitaxel (80 mg/kg) did not inhibit tumor growth (Fig. 3A)
. Evidence of treatment effect was also observed in the form of weight loss. Mice in the control group and the paclitaxel-treated group quickly lost weight due to the increased tumor burden. PG-TXL-treated animals maintained their body weight in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3C)
, indicating that the treatment was effective in relieving the tumor burden.
FSa-II tumor showed similar patterns of sensitivity to PG-TXL and paclitaxel (Fig. 4)
. Both PG-TXL and paclitaxel reduced body weight loss in comparison with weight loss in saline-treated control mice (Fig. 4C)
. Statistical analysis revealed that all treatments except the Cremophor vehicle caused slight yet significant growth delay as compared with growth in the saline-treated group.
Human Tumor Xenografts
Nude mice were less tolerant of PG-TXL and paclitaxel than were C3Hf/Kam mice. At 160 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg, 5 of 10 mice died within a week after PG-TXL injection. Therefore, only the dose of
120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg was used in subsequent experiments. One mouse in the PG-TXL group treated with 120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg died with extreme weight loss; no other obvious therapy-related deaths were observed in the PG-TXL-treated mice throughout these experiments. A total of seven mice died immediately after the injection of the Cremophor vehicle (three mice) or paclitaxel (four mice), possibly because of hypersensitivity reactions.
SKOV3ip1 Ovarian Cancer.
In the first experiment, all drugs were given by a single bolus injection. Compared with PG alone, PG-TXL significantly extended the survival of the mice with i.p. SKOV3ip1 (P = 0.0058 and P = 0.0001 at 60 and 120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg, respectively; Fig. 5B
). The median survival times for mice treated with PG alone or PG-TXL at doses of 60 and 120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg were 43, 61, and 75 days, respectively.
|
The second experiment with SKOV3ip1 used three injections of PG-TXL at 7-day intervals. Repeated injections of PG-TXL extended the survival time of tumor-bearing mice. The median survival time after three injections of PG-TXL at 120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg was 82 days (Fig. 5C)
. However, no significant difference was noted between survival after a single injection and multiple injections (P = 0.837), although these were not given in the same experiment.
MDA-MB-435 Breast Tumor.
In mice with MDA-MB-435Lung2 breast tumors, the 60 and 120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg dosage groups of PG-TXL produced regression of the tumor in 20% and 50% of the cases, respectively. At the dose of 120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg, PG-TXL also caused reduction of lung metastases. Of the four animals with progressively growing tumors, only one had micrometastasis in the lung. The size of the metastases varied from microscopic to 12 mm in diameter. Fig. 6
shows the histology of lungs from nude mice bearing MDA-MB-435Lung2 tumor. The control groups treated with either PBS, PG, or Cremophor vehicle, or with paclitaxel at 60 mg/kg (MTD: 80 mg/kg) showed extensive metastatic disease in the lungs. In contrast, the lungs of mice treated with PG-TXL showed few metastases or no metastases at equivalent paclitaxel doses of 60 and 120 mg/kg, respectively (Fig. 6)
.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results indicate that there is an acceptable therapeutic index for PG-TXL. The highest dose tested in the C3Hf/Kam mice, 160 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg, was well tolerated. In the paclitaxel-responsive murine MCa-4 tumor, a greater response was achieved with single i.v. injection of PG-TXL at 120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg (AGD, 39.6 days) than with paclitaxel at its MTD of 80 mg/kg (AGD, 4.5 days). In previous studies, we have shown that PG-TXL is extremely active against mammary 13762F tumor in rats. Although the MTD of PG-TXL in rats is 60 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg, complete tumor regression is achieved at 40 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg (7) .
The higher efficacy of PG-TXL over paclitaxel in murine tumors may be attributed to improved tumor uptake of active drug as a result of reduced toxicity, increased injection dose, and enhanced permeability and retention effect of the polymer-drug conjugate. However, other mechanisms of action in addition to paclitaxel-induced cell death may also exist. The antitumor effects of paclitaxel against syngeneic murine tumors are due, in large part, to apoptosis (8) . Previously, we observed that PG-TXL induced less apoptosis than paclitaxel in a paclitaxel-responsive tumor, OCa-1 (7) . Because paclitaxel induces only low levels of apoptosis in MCa-35 and HCa-1 tumors (8) , it is plausible that the observed activity for PG-TXL may not be related to a direct cell killing effect of paclitaxel, which is released only very slowly from PG-TXL in the tumor (7) . The in vivo activity of PG-TXL may be the result of its complex interactions with various genetic and molecular factors of the tumor (including p53, bcl-2, epidermal growth factor, and HER-2/neu) and with various host factors including angiogenic response, hormones, cytokines, and immune response effector cells. We have begun to study the functionality and temporal expression of some of these factors in response to PG-TXL.
SKOV3ip1 is a human ovarian cancer cell line which overexpresses HER2/neu (10) . Amplification and overexpression of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene has been found to correlate with both poor prognosis and decreased survival in breast and ovarian cancer patients (11 , 12) . Using human breast tumor lines, Yu et al. (13) demonstrated that cells with HER-2/neu overexpression are highly resistant to paclitaxel treatment. The finding that PG-TXL at 60 and 120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg significantly extended the median survival time of mice with i.p. SKOV3ip1 tumor could have important clinical implications.
The orthotopic human breast MDA-MB435 cancer forms metastases in the lung (14)
. Price et al. (14
, 15)
have shown that human breast carcinomas grow better when injected in the mammary fat pad of nude mice than when injected s.c.. These results indicate that the progression and metastatic pattern of tumor cells are influenced by both the biological behavior of the tumor cells and the surrounding microenvironments. Therefore, in examining the antitumor effect of any agent, it is important to consider the impact of relevant organ condition. As shown in Fig. 6
, PG-TXL at 120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg induced tumor regression in 50% of animals and reduced the incidence of lung metastases to only 25%. Although the number of mice in the experiment was small, the results suggest that the therapy was effective in controlling both local tumor growth and tumor metastasis. In this study design, it is not possible to distinguish whether the lower incidence of metastasis was a result of reduction in primary tumor mass or a direct effect of PG-TXL on metastases that may have already been established at the time of therapy.
In both human tumor xenograft experiments, a single bolus injection of PG-TXL was given i.v. To resolve the question whether repeated treatments were more beneficial, we also gave mice multiple injections of PG-TXL. The results, shown in Fig. 5
, indicate that although repeated injections of PG-TXL at the accumulated dose of 360 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg were well tolerated, the activity was similar to that of a single injection of the drug at 120 mg of equivalent paclitaxel/kg. These results, combined with our previous finding that PG-TXL at its maximum dose was most active, suggest that a schedule designed to intensify the initial dose of PG-TXL may be most beneficial in clinical practice.
In conclusion, PG-TXL possesses therapeutic potential against a variety of solid tumors, including paclitaxel-resistant tumors. Additional studies will be required to fully characterize the nature of the tumor uptake of PG-TXL, interaction with various tumor and host factors, and ultimate mechanism of cytotoxicity. The antitumor activity of PG-TXL demonstrated in tumor models used in this study clearly warrants clinical investigation of this novel agent for possible use against human solid tumors.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Licensed to Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (Cti, Seattle, Washington). ![]()
2 Supported in part by National Cancer Institute Grant R29-CA74819, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Breast Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Research Programs, and the Gianturco Fund and Dunn Foundation. ![]()
3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Diagnostic Radiology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Box 59, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 792-5182; Fax: (713) 794-5456; E-mail: cli{at}di.mdacc.tmc.edu ![]()
4 The abbreviations used are: PG, poly(L-glutamic acid); PG-TXL, PG-paclitaxel conjugate; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; AGD, absolute growth delay. ![]()
Received 9/14/98; revised 1/11/99; accepted 1/12/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Banzato, S. Bobisse, M. Rondina, D. Renier, F. Bettella, G. Esposito, L. Quintieri, L. Melendez-Alafort, U. Mazzi, P. Zanovello, et al. A Paclitaxel-Hyaluronan Bioconjugate Targeting Ovarian Cancer Affords a Potent In vivo Therapeutic Activity Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3598 - 3606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Hennenfent and R. Govindan Novel formulations of taxanes: a review. Old wine in a new bottle? Ann. Onc., May 1, 2006; 17(5): 735 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Boddy, E. R. Plummer, R. Todd, J. Sludden, M. Griffin, L. Robson, J. Cassidy, D. Bissett, A. Bernareggi, M. W. Verrill, et al. A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Paclitaxel Poliglumex (XYOTAX), Investigating Both 3-Weekly and 2-Weekly Schedules Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 11(21): 7834 - 7840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Aggarwal, S. Shishodia, Y. Takada, S. Banerjee, R. A. Newman, C. E. Bueso-Ramos, and J. E. Price Curcumin Suppresses the Paclitaxel-Induced Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Pathway in Breast Cancer Cells and Inhibits Lung Metastasis of Human Breast Cancer in Nude Mice Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 11(20): 7490 - 7498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zou, H. Fu, S. Ghosh, D. Farquhar, and J. Klostergaard Antitumor Activity of Hydrophilic Paclitaxel Copolymer Prodrug Using Locoregional Delivery in Human Orthotopic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Xenograft Models Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 10(21): 7382 - 7391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Langer Dilemmas in Management: The Controversial Role of Chemotherapy in PS 2 Advanced NSCLC and the Potential Role of CT-2103 (XyotaxTM) Oncologist, July 1, 2004; 9(4): 398 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Auzenne, N. J. Donato, C. Li, E. Leroux, R. E. Price, D. Farquhar, and J. Klostergaard Superior Therapeutic Profile of Poly-L-Glutamic Acid-Paclitaxel Copolymer Compared with Taxol in Xenogeneic Compartmental Models of Human Ovarian Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 8(2): 573 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Li, S. Ke, Q.-P. Wu, W. Tansey, N. Hunter, L. M. Buchmiller, L. Milas, C. Charnsangavej, and S. Wallace Tumor Irradiation Enhances the Tumor-specific Distribution of Poly(L-glutamic acid)-conjugated Paclitaxel and Its Antitumor Efficacy Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2000; 6(7): 2829 - 2834. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |