
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology [S. C. G., M. G. K.], and Clinical Immunology Service, Division of Hematology [A. N. H., P. B. C.], Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York 10021
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ganglioside GD3 is a cell surface glycosphingolipid antigen with limited expression in normal tissues, being largely restricted to cells of neuroectodermal origin and to a subset of T lymphocytes 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) . Most SCLC tumors and cell lines express GD3 (8) .4 Our experience in melanoma indicated that ganglioside GD3 would be an appropriate antigenic target for immunological therapy in GD3-positive tumors (9) , and this was supported by our experience in immunizing melanoma patients against GD3 using the anti-idiotypic antibody BEC2, a mouse IgG2b anti-idiotypic antibody that structurally mimics GD3 (10) . For these reasons, we undertook a trial in SCLC patients. BEC2 was combined with BCG because experience in the melanoma system indicated that a potent immune adjuvant was required to induce an immune response against GD3.
The objectives of the trial were as follows: (a) to study the toxicity and feasibility of immunizing SCLC patients with BEC2 plus BCG after achieving a major objective response to standard therapy; (b) to determine whether immunization with BEC2 combined with BCG results in a humoral response directed against the GD3 ganglioside in such patients after chemotherapy with or without radiation; and (c) to observe the overall survival and relapse-free survival of patients receiving this treatment.
| PATIENTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3500 cells/mm3
. Patients with clinically significant heart disease (New York Heart Association Class III or IV) or other serious intercurrent illnesses, including active infections requiring antibiotics or a known immunodeficiency, were excluded. While receiving immunizations, the use of antihistamines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or corticosteroids was not permitted. Patients who had previously received mouse antibody injections were also ineligible. Treatment consisted of a series of five immunizations of BEC2 plus BCG administered intradermally on weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 10. BEC2 was combined with reconstituted BCG (TheraCys; Connaught Laboratories, Inc., Swiftwater, PA) before administration. For each patient, the first immunization consisted of 2.5 mg of BEC2 combined with 2 x 107 CFU of BCG. The mixture was then administered in a series of intradermal injections in one limb. Subsequent immunizations were administered in different limbs. During the course of immunization, the dose of BEC2 remained at 2.5 mg, whereas the dose of BCG administered was reduced for each subsequent dose: 3 x 106 CFU/immunization on week 2; 1 x 106 CFU/immunization on week 4; 3 x 105 CFU/immunization on week 6; and 1 x 105 CFU/immunization on week 10. Blood samples were collected before the initiation of treatment and then collected every 2 weeks for a total of 12 weeks. Patients were required to receive at least four immunizations to be evaluable for serological response. Determination of serum titers of anti-BEC2 (human antimouse antibody HAMA) and anti-GD3 titers were determined by ELISA as described previously (10) . A positive anti-GD3 antibody response in a patient was defined as at least a 4-fold increase in anti-GD3 titer in at least two separate serum samples compared to the patients preimmune serum. Overall survival, time to relapse, and disease-free survival were measured by the method of Kaplan and Meier (12) . The survival analysis was performed on an "intent to treat" basis that included one patient who relapsed after three immunizations.
Patient Characteristics.
A total of 15 patients were entered on study. At the time of their diagnosis, eight patients had extensive stage disease, and seven had limited stage disease. There were eight men and seven women, with a median age of 61 years (range, 4273 years) and a median Karnofsky performance status of 80% (range, 7090%). Two patients with limited stage disease and one patient with extensive stage disease presented with hyponatremia, and one patient with limited stage disease and four patients with extensive stage disease had elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase at diagnosis. All patients were treated with standard chemotherapy regimens; the majority were treated with a combination of cisplatin plus etoposide. Other drugs administered included cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and carboplatin. All patients with limited stage disease received thoracic radiation. Eleven patients had partial responses, and four patients had complete responses by WHO criteria after the completion of standard therapy. The median time from initiation of treatment to completion of standard therapy was 5.4 months (range, 3.511 months).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients developed anti-BEC2 antibodies (HAMA). Of the 13 patients evaluable for a serological response, 5 developed measurable anti-GD3 antibody responses. All of them developed measurable IgM anti-GD3 antibodies; 3 patients also developed IgG antibodies (Fig. 1)
. Peak titers ranged from 1:80 to 1:320, consistent with our previous results in melanoma patients (10)
. We did not measure the duration of anti-GD3 titers in most patients, but in at least one patient, anti-GD3 antibodies were detectable after 1 year (data not shown). However, the anti-GD3 response was short-lived in some patients (Fig. 1C)
.
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study demonstrated the feasibility of immunizing patients with SCLC after treatment with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, using a 10-week schedule derived from our prior experience in immunizing patients with melanoma against ganglioside antigens. Despite concerns by many investigators that prior chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy would result in immunosuppression, there are little data to support this. Using rigorous criteria for a positive response, all patients developed anti-mouse antibodies, and 5 of 13 patients evaluable for a serological response were shown to have a positive anti-GD3 antibody response. This is similar to our previous observations in melanoma patients who had never received treatment, in which BEC2 plus BCG induced measurable serological responses in 20% of patients (10) , and suggests that there is no measurable humoral immune suppression in these patients. Four of the five patients with positive antibody responses have had the longest systemic relapse-free survival. Patients without measurable anti-GD3 antibody responses have also had long relapse-free survivals, possibly reflecting the limitations of the assays used. Systemic antibody levels below those measured in our assays may be sufficient to provide an antitumor effect. The dose-response relationship between anti-GD3 antibodies remains unclear, and antitumor responses as threshold titers for antitumor effects have not been confirmed for any human tumor system. It is interesting to note that in passive immunotherapy trials using the mouse anti-GD3 antibody R24, antimelanoma effects occurred at lower doses rather than at higher doses (9) . Alternatively, there may be other immune effector mechanisms at play. The role of cellular immunity also remains unresolved.
Overall, the treatment was well tolerated; the only significant toxicity was the local skin reaction to immunization with live BCG, which was self-limited. Although most patients experienced skin ulceration, this was self-limiting in all cases and neither interfered with the patients activities nor required treatment. Despite the fact that GD3 is expressed on some normal tissues, there was no evidence that there was any toxicity related to an immune response against these tissues.
Conclusion.
To date, despite an ever-growing number of highly active chemotherapeutic agents for SCLC, neither increasing doses nor duration of therapy has altered the cure rate over the past two decades, and most patients continue to die of this disease. In an attempt to improve these results, investigators have explored the use of immunological therapies, including the use of BCG, without apparent benefit (17, 18, 19)
. The data from our study suggest that immunization with BEC2 plus BCG may be an effective means to eliminate residual disease not destroyed by conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Notwithstanding the limited power of the present study, six of seven patients with limited stage SCLC remain free of progression 1269 months after diagnosis, with a median follow-up of 47 months. To further explore the effects of BEC2/BCG vaccine, a Phase III trial entitled "Survival in an International Phase III Prospective Randomized Limited Disease SCLC Vaccination Study with Adjuvant BEC2 and BCG (SILVA)" is under way to evaluate, in a randomized prospective manner, the role of BEC2 plus BCG as an adjuvant therapy after completion of standard treatment for SCLC.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by NIH Grant CA-33409, the Swim Across America Foundation, the Louis and Anne Abrons Foundation, the American Cancer Society, and Imclone Systems, Inc. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. Phone: (212) 639-5126; Fax: (212) 794-4357. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: SCLC, small cell lung cancer; BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin; CFU, colony-forming unit. ![]()
4 S. C. Grant, unpublished observations. ![]()
Received 11/30/98; revised 2/ 2/99; accepted 2/11/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
as maintenance therapy for small cell lung cancer. Eur. J. Cancer, 28A: 1387-1391, 1992.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Hernandez, D. Toledo, D. Martinez, T. Grinan, V. Brito, A. Macias, S. Alfonso, T. Rondon, E. Suarez, A. M. Vazquez, et al. Characterization of the Antibody Response against NeuGcGM3 Ganglioside Elicited in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Immunized with an Anti-Idiotype Antibody J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 6625 - 6634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Socinski and J. A. Bogart Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Current Status of Combined-Modality Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2007; 25(26): 4137 - 4145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sabbatini and K. Odunsi Immunologic Approaches to Ovarian Cancer Treatment J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2007; 25(20): 2884 - 2893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Pfisterer, A du Bois, J Sehouli, S Loibl, S Reinartz, A Reuss, U Canzler, A Belau, C Jackisch, R Kimmig, et al. The anti-idiotypic antibody abagovomab in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. A phase I trial of the AGO-OVAR. Ann. Onc., October 1, 2006; 17(10): 1568 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Durrant, S. J. Harding, N. H. Green, L. D. Buckberry, and T. Parsons A New Anticancer Glycolipid Monoclonal Antibody, SC104, which Directly Induces Tumor Cell Apoptosis Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5901 - 5909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Raez, S. Fein, and E. R. Podack Lung Cancer Immunotherapy Clin. Med. Res., November 1, 2005; 3(4): 221 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Giaccone, C. Debruyne, E. Felip, P. B. Chapman, S. C. Grant, M. Millward, L. Thiberville, G. D'addario, C. Coens, L. S. Rome, et al. Phase III Study of Adjuvant Vaccination With Bec2/Bacille Calmette-Guerin in Responding Patients With Limited-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 08971-08971B; Silva Study) J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2005; 23(28): 6854 - 6864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Chapman, D. Wu, G. Ragupathi, S. Lu, L. Williams, W.-J. Hwu, D. Johnson, and P. O. Livingston Sequential Immunization of Melanoma Patients with GD3 Ganglioside Vaccine and Anti-Idiotypic Monoclonal Antibody That Mimics GD3 Ganglioside Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2004; 10(14): 4717 - 4723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Reinartz, S. Kohler, H. Schlebusch, K. Krista, P. Giffels, K. Renke, J. Huober, V. Mobus, R. Kreienberg, A. duBois, et al. Vaccination of Patients with Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma with the Anti-Idiotype ACA125: Immunological Response and Survival (Phase Ib/II) Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 10(5): 1580 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Korst and R. G. Crystal Active, specific immunotherapy for lung cancer: hurdles and strategies using genetic modification Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1319 - 1326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Spiro and J. C. Porter Lung Cancer--Where Are We Today?: Current Advances in Staging and Nonsurgical Treatment Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2002; 166(9): 1166 - 1196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Alfonso, A. Diaz, A. M. Hernandez, A. Perez, E. Rodriguez, R. Bitton, R. Perez, and A. M. Vazquez An Anti-Idiotype Vaccine Elicits a Specific Response to N-Glycolyl Sialic Acid Residues of Glycoconjugates in Melanoma Patients J. Immunol., March 1, 2002; 168(5): 2523 - 2529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Foon and M. Bhattacharya-Chatterjee Are Solid Tumor Anti-Idiotype Vaccines Ready for Prime Time?: Commentary re: U. Wagner et al., Immunological Consolidation of Ovarian Carcinoma Recurrences with Monoclonal Anti-Idiotype Antibody ACA125: Immune Responses and Survival in Palliative Treatment. Clin. Cancer Res., 7: 1154-1162, 2001. Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2001; 7(5): 1112 - 1115. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Johnson and D. P. Carbone Increased Dose-Intensity in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Failed Strategy? J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 1999; 17(8): 2297 - 2297. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |