| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Departments of Radiation and Cellular Oncology [J. D. B., Y. K., S. A., S. M. C., R. R. W.] and Virology [B. R.], University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637; and Departments of Statistics [R. B. A.], Neurosurgery [G. Y. G., J. M. M.], and Pediatrics [R. J. W.], University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama 35294.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 34.5 gene (7, 8, 9, 10, 11)
. The
1 34.5 gene product allows viral replication in neurons and inhibits host shutoff of protein synthesis following HSV-1 infection. R3616, with both copies of
1 34.5 deleted, has been the prototype for various antiglioma strategies. This virus, compared with wild-type HSV, has a replicative advantage in cycling glioma cells when compared with quiescent neurons and has a limited distribution of tissue damage along the injection site (7
, 8
, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15)
. Studies on human intracranial gliomas in murine models treated with the R3616 recombinant virus show more modest antitumor effects than other more virulent mutants because the tumor cell kill is limited by decreased viral proliferation and distribution within the tumor (16) . Ionizing radiation, in addition to its own cytocidal properties, interacts with R3616, resulting in enhanced viral replication, improved distribution, and tumor volume reduction (16) . These studies involved large doses of 20 and 25 Gy in a hindlimb glioma model. Here we report on the effects of R3616 administration combined with clinically relevant fraction sizes of radiation in both hindlimb and orthotopic intracranial glioma models.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 34.5 gene deleted (7)
.
Hindlimb Glioma Experiment.
All of the animal work was carried out under protocols approved by the University of Chicago Animal Research Committee. U87-MG cells (1 x 107) suspended in a volume of 10 µl of sterile PBS were injected s.c. into the right hind limb of athymic nude mice. When the tumor volume reached 200 mm3, the mice were randomized to the following treatment arms: R3616 alone, radiation alone, and R3616 + radiation. Viral doses were 1 x 107 PFU per tumor. The fractional tumor volume means were calculated for each treatment arm and compared. The fractional tumor volume was defined as the tumor volume at the measurement time point divided by the initial tumor volume.
For irradiation, the mice were immobilized in Lucite chambers. Their whole body was shielded with lead except for the tumor-bearing right hind limb. Radiation was delivered with a Maxitron 250 X-ray generator (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI) using 150 kVp at a dose rate of 1.91 Gy/min. Fractionated irradiation consisted of 5-Gy fractions on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday over 2 weeks to a total dose of 40 Gy.
Intracranial Glioma Experiment.
Surgery was performed using sterile technique. The animals were anesthetized by i.p. administration of ketamine (20 mg/ml) and xylazine (0.3 mg/ml) in saline at 0.07 ml/10 g of body weight. A midline scalp incision was made, and a 0.5-mm burr hole was drilled 1.52.0 mm to the right of midline and 1 mm posterior to the coronal suture. The tumor cells were injected stereotactically, using a 250-µl Hamilton syringe with a prepared 30 gauge needle mounted in a Stoelting stereotaxic apparatus. A plastic sleeve surrounding the needle allowed reproducible injections of tumor cells or virus to a depth of 2.5 mm. Tumor cells (5 x 105) suspended in 5 µl of modified Eagle medium (MEM) and 5% methylcellulose were injected with a Hamilton repeatable dispenser. The needles were left in place for 2 min to minimize reflux of the inoculum along the needle track. The incision was closed with 9-mm Michel wound clips. The mice were placed on a heating pad in sterile microisolator polycarbonate cages and allowed to awaken from anesthesia. During recovery, the animals were randomly assigned to treatment groups. The day of tumor inoculation was assigned as day 0.
On day 5, the animals assigned to receive R3616 virus were inoculated with 1 x 107 PFU in 5 µl of MEM. The same sterile surgical materials and procedures were used. Animals not assigned to viral groups received sham intracranial injections consisting of 5 µl of MEM. The scalp wounds were closed with nexabond glue to avoid scatter dose from metallic wound clips during radiation treatment. Animals in the second experiment received a second R3616 viral or sham injection on day 12.
Irradiation consisted of 30 Gy delivered in 5-Gy fractions to the whole brain, delivered on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for 2 weeks. This dose was not intended as a curative dose. The radiation energy was 150 kVp as described above for the hindlimb experiment. Irradiation started 6 h after viral injection on day 5. This regimen has been shown to increase viral replication and spread within the tumor mass.4 Irradiated mice were immobilized in Lucite chambers. Their bodies were shielded with 3 mm of lead placed over the chamber, extending from behind the ears to the tail. The mice in this treatment regimen received their radiation fractions on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for 2 weeks. The mice were followed until death or until they became moribund from progressive tumor growth and were euthanized. Mice euthanized for progressive tumor growth had uncontrolled tumor growing beyond the scalp. The date of death for euthanized mice was marked as the date of euthanasia.
Immunohistochemical Staining.
To demonstrate tumor growth and viral replication, a separate set of animals was inoculated intracranially with 5 x 105 of U87-MG cells. The mice were inoculated with 1 x 107 PFU of R3616 on day 5, and half of these underwent whole brain irradiation to 30 Gy in 5-Gy fractions as above. To demonstrate viral proliferation in vivo, two mice in each group were sacrificed on days 1, 3, and 12 postinfection. Tumor harvest was performed after intracardial formalin infusion. The brains were fixed an additional 24 h at 4°C and sectioned coronally through the injection site. The tumors were then embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained. Immunohistochemistry studies used rabbit polyclonal antibody to HSV (PU086-UP; Biogenex, San Ramon, CA) at a dilution of 1:80.
Statistical Analysis.
For the hindlimb model, a Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed comparing the three groups with respect to end points
2.5 and >2.5 times the original tumor volume. For the intracranial model, tests for homogeneity were performed for the two groups by both the Wilcoxon and Log-rank methods. A pairwise comparison was then performed for both groups using Bonferronis method. Survival curves were plotted for all arms in experiments 1 and 2, using absolute survivals. To test for interaction between irradiation and R3616, the statistical method of Machado and Bailey (17)
was performed for both groups tested.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Animals in experiment 2 experienced shorter median survivals in each of the treated groups when compared with the animals in experiment 1. The reason for the shorter survivals in the second experiment is unclear. Our observation is that the third intracranial injection within a 12-day period was poorly tolerated, resulting in longer recovery times and shorter median survivals. Regardless, the results of both experiments suggest that the addition of ionizing radiation to cells containing R3616 results in a synergistic cell kill. Further study is needed to confirm these findings.
Immunohistochemistry staining for R3616 was performed to show enhanced viral proliferation in irradiated tumors. Brains containing tumor were harvested on days 1, 3, and 12 post-viral injection and stained for virus in both the R3616 and the XRT + R3616 groups. Viral staining shows infection by R3616 in both irradiated and unirradiated tumors 1 day following injection. The unirradiated tumors did not stain for virus after 3 days. However, the irradiated tumors remained positive after 12 days (Fig. 4)
. Viral counts were 15/hpf and 13/hpf in the irradiated group at 3 and 12 days following R3616 inoculation compared with 0/hpf in the unirradiated mice at 3 and 12 days. Thus, fractionated doses produce a 2- to 5-fold enhancement in viral proliferation similar to that seen previously with 20- and 25-Gy doses (16)
.
|
The interaction of R3616 with ionizing radiation was initially reported by Advani et. al. (16) in hindlimb U87-MG xenografts. This study used large doses (20 + 25 Gy) of radiation and reported a 2- to 5-fold enhancement of viral replication and improved viral distribution in irradiated versus unirradiated tumors. Complete regression of the tumor was seen in 22 of 33 mice in the combined group versus 4 of 33 in the group receiving R3616 alone. The mechanism of enhanced HSV proliferation with ionizing radiation remains unknown. Our hypothesis is that tumor cells produce some gene product in response to irradiation that stimulates viral proliferation. Experiments are under way to delineate this mechanism.
The combination of R3616 and fractionated ionizing radiation significantly extended the growth delay versus either virus or radiation alone in hindlimb xenografts (Fig. 1)
. The growth delay seen in the hindlimb model correlates with the longer survivals seen in the intracranial model (Figs. 2
and 3
). The advantage of using hindlimb tumors in addition to intracranial tumors is that these tumors can be measured directly for differences in volume and correlated to tumor control within the brain. Better tumor control results in longer survival. This benefit is consistent in both intracranial studies.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work was supported by NIH PO 1 Grant CA71933-01. J. D. B. was the recipient of an American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Fellowship Award. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at: Washington University Medical School, Mallinkrodt Institute of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology, 510 South Kingshighway, St. Louis, MO 63115. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: GBM, glioblastoma mutliforme; HSV, herpes simplex virus; PFU, plaque-forming unit(s); MEM, modified Eagle medium; hpf, high-power field. ![]()
4 S. M. Chung, S. Advani, B. Roizman, and R. R. Weichselbaum, unpublished data. ![]()
Received 9/21/98; revised 11/13/98; accepted 12/17/98.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 34.5, a gene nonessential for growth culture. Science (Washington DC), 250: 1262-1266, 1990.
1 34.5 deletion mutants in rodent models. J. Clin. Invest., 91: 2837-2843, 1993.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. L.M. Lamfers, S. Idema, L. Bosscher, S. Heukelom, S. Moeniralm, I. H. van der Meulen-Muileman, R. M. Overmeer, P. van der Valk, V. W. van Beusechem, W. R. Gerritsen, et al. Differential Effects of Combined Ad5-{Delta}24RGD and Radiation Therapy in In vitro versus In vivo Models of Malignant Glioma Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7451 - 7458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Liu, J. N. Sarkaria, C. A. Petell, G. Paraskevakou, P. J. Zollman, M. Schroeder, B. Carlson, P. A. Decker, W. Wu, C. D. James, et al. Combination of Measles Virus Virotherapy and Radiation Therapy Has Synergistic Activity in the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 13(23): 7155 - 7165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Hadjipanayis and N. A. DeLuca Inhibition of DNA Repair by a Herpes Simplex Virus Vector Enhances the Radiosensitivity of Human Glioblastoma Cells Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 65(12): 5310 - 5316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Miller, C. R. Williams, D. J. Buchsbaum, and G. Y. Gillespie Intratumoral 5-Fluorouracil Produced by Cytosine Deaminase/5-Fluorocytosine Gene Therapy Is Effective for Experimental Human Glioblastomas Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 62(3): 773 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. N. Khodarev, J. O. Park, J. Yu, N. Gupta, E. Nodzenski, B. Roizman, and R. R. Weichselbaum Dose-dependent and independent temporal patterns of gene responses to ionizing radiation in normal and tumor cells and tumor xenografts PNAS, October 23, 2001; 98(22): 12665 - 12670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |