
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
Departments of Clinical Oncology [T. W. T. L., S. K. W. H., A. T. C. C., T. S. K. M., W. Y., A. M. Y. T., P. J. J.], Surgery [W-y. L.], Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging [S. C. H. Y.], Anatomical and Cellular Pathology [C-t. L.], and Medicine [N. W. Y. L.], The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, and M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas 77030-4009 [Y. Z. P.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-IFN (PIAF) in advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Fifty patients with either unresectable or metastatic disease were treated with PIAF: cisplatin (20 mg/m2 i.v., days 14), doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 i.v., day 1), 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 i.v., days 14), and
-IFN (5 MU/m2 s.c., days 14). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks to a maximum of six cycles. All patients were evaluable for response, toxicity, and survival. As assessed by conventional imaging criteria, there were no complete responses, but 13 patients (26%) had a partial response. Among the 36 patients who had an initially high |ga-fetoprotein level (>500 ng/ml), 15 (42%) had a >50% fall after therapy. Nine patients underwent surgical resection after achieving partial response and, in 4 of these patients, histological examination of the resected specimens revealed no viable tumor cells. All these nine patients are alive, and eight patients remain in complete remission at between 7.6 and 25.8 months at the time of analysis. The overall median survival was 8.9 months. Toxicity was mainly myelosuppression and mucositis. There were two treatment-related deaths due to neutropenic sepsis. PIAF is active in hepatocellular carcinoma despite considerable hematological toxicity. Complete pathological remission is possible with this systemic combination. Apparently, persistent radiological lesions may still represent complete pathological resolution of active disease. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IFNs are proteins produced by cells in response to viral infection and foreign antigens. They have immunomodulatory and antiproliferative effects on tumor cells.
-IFN has a modest degree of activity in HCC as a single agent and was reported to be superior to doxorubicin in one randomized study in terms of survival, tumor regression rates, and toxicity (9)
. IFN and 5-FU have synergistic activity both in cell lines (10)
and clinically in colonic cancer (11)
.
-IFN was combined with 5-FU to treat advanced HCC in one study, and an objective RR of 18% was documented (12)
. More durable responses were seen in patients with a low serum AFP level in this study. However, a subsequent study involving 10 patients with HCC, and using the same combination of 5-FU and
-IFN, could not confirm these findings (13)
.
In this phase II trial, cisplatin, doxorubicin, 5-FU, and
-IFN were chosen because of the in vitro synergistic activity (between 5-FU and
-IFN), lack of cross-resistance and, except for bone marrow suppression, different toxicity profiles. This combination of drugs, which was initially designed and used at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, was modified at The Chinese University of Hong Kong to a regimen that was suitable for out-patient administration. The objective of the study was to determine the RR and toxicity of PIAF for the treatment of advanced unresectable HCC and the effect on survival.
| PATIENTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Treatment Plan.
Patients were treated on an outpatient basis according to the regimen shown in Table 1
. All i.v. treatment was given through a peripheral vein. Cisplatin (20 mg/m2) was given i.v. in 1 liter of normal saline solution over 1 h, daily for 4 days. 5-FU (400 mg/m2) was given as a short i.v. infusion daily for 4 days. Recombinant
-IFN-2b (5 M.U./m2; Intron-A, Schering-Plough Inc., Kenilworth, NJ) was given s.c. daily for 4 days. Doxorubicin was given on day 1 of each cycle at a dosage of 40 mg/m2. Metoclopramide and dexamethasone were given before chemotherapy to control nausea and vomiting. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks or delayed 1 week until the platelet count was >100 x 109/liter and WBC count was >3 x 109/liter. The maximum number of cycles was six. Doxorubicin, cisplatin, and 5-FU dosages were reduced by 25% if there was grade 3 or more leukopenia or thrombocytopenia.
|
Definition of Objective Response.
CR was defined as the complete disappearance of all known lesions on radiological grounds and normalization of the AFP level for at least 4 weeks. PR was defined as a decrease of 50% or more in the product of two perpendicular diameters of the largest tumor nodule for at least 4 weeks without the appearance of new lesions or progression of lesions. SD (static disease) was defined as a <50% decrease, or not more than a 25% increase, in the product of two perpendicular diameters of the largest tumor nodule. PD was defined as a >25% increase in the product of two perpendicular diameters of the largest tumor nodule or one of the measurable lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. Patients who did not survive to reassessment by radiological methods were considered to have UR. Calculation of RRs was based on the intent to treat.
Statistical Methods.
Simons (15)
optimum two-stage Phase II design was used in this trial. Assuming the target and lower activity of the combination chemotherapy to be 25% and 10%, respectively, 21 patients are required in the first stage of accrual and, if there are more than two objective responses in the first stage, a total of 50 patients will be accrued. This gives a probability of 65% for early termination after the first stage when the true objective RR is
10%. Survival duration was calculated from the 1st day of chemotherapy. Actuarial survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Response.
A total of 163 courses of PIAF were delivered, with a median number of three cycles per patient. Only 12 patients received the full six cycles, with the remainder receiving less due to intolerable toxicity (9 patients) or nonresponsive disease (29 patients). Eight patients who did not have evaluation of response due to early death, were classified as UR. According to conventional radiological response criteria, as defined above, there were no CRs, but 13 patients (26%) had PR. Fourteen (28%) and 15 (30%) patients had SD and PD, respectively. Tumor RRs are shown in Table 3
. The pre- and posttreatment CT scans of a patient who achieved PR after six cycles of treatment are shown in Fig. 1
, A and B. The serum AFP level of this patient fell from an initial reading of 71,000 ng/ml to 1,029 ng/ml after treatment. The posttreatment CT scan of this patient revealed hypertrophy of the nontumorous liver after the primary tumor in the right hepatic lobe had regressed. Similar findings occurred in six other patients who achieved a PR. Among 36 patients who had a markedly raised serum AFP level (above 500 ng/ml) before treatment, 15 (42%) of them had a >50% reduction after treatment. Comparison of survival between the patients with high pretreatment (above median value) and those with low pretreatment (below median value) AFP levels by log-rank test did not show any significant difference.
|
|
Survival.
At the time of analysis, 20 patients remained alive, including the 9 patients who underwent surgery. There were two defaults and 28 deaths. The median survival was 8.9 months. One of the patients, who had a complete pathological remission after chemotherapy and surgery, had the longest survival of 25.8 months from the 1st day of chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival curve for all patients is shown in Fig. 2
.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-IFN is used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and C infections. Its antiproliferative and immunomodulatory activity has also led to indications in some hematological malignancies, including chronic myeloid leukemia, hairy cell leukemia, and low-grade lymphoma. It is also used in the treatment of pulmonary angiomatosis because of its antiangiogenesis effects.
-IFN has been used as a single agent to treat advanced HCC and produced a RR of 31.4% and a small improvement in survival (9)
. However, the large dose of IFN (50 M.U./m2, 3 times/week) used in this study resulted in significant toxicity.
In the light of these observations, the present study aimed to improve efficacy of systemic chemotherapy by combining four relatively active drugs that have synergistic activity. Patients with inoperable disease or extrahepatic disease, who were not suitable for regional intra-arterial treatment, were studied for efficacy and toxicity from this new combination. The treatment resulted in an objective RR of 26% and a median survival of 8.9 months that are comparable with, or better than, most Phase II systemic chemotherapy trials. Although the results look inferior to other series using regional intra-arterial treatment, the majority of the patients in the present study was not suitable for regional treatment due to presence of metastasis or portal venous obstruction.
A significant reduction of serum AFP levels (>50%) occurred in 42% of patients, although the objective RR by conventional radiological methods was less. It is possible that, in such cases, the tumor actually responds to treatment, but this is not reflected by conventional radiological changes. Thus, four patients had a complete pathological remission that was documented histologically after surgical resection of residual lesions. This suggests that the type of systemic chemotherapy used in the present study, as a single modality, is able to eradicate the disease. It also emphasizes that residual lesions, on conventional radiological grounds, may not represent active disease, an observation we have made previously after SIR (19) . Additional studies are required to correlate tumor regression, reduction of serum AFP, and pathological response after chemotherapy. Using radiological regression as the sole criterion for response may have previously undermined some active agents or combinations of agents, especially when the serum AFP estimation could not be used to monitor response, due to low or negative pretreatment levels.
There were nine patients (18%) who initially had inoperable disease due to various reasons and subsequently underwent surgical resection of residual lesions after PIAF. All of them had achieved complete clinical remission after surgery, and eight of them had sustained remission from 7.6 months to as long as 25.8 months from start of treatment. Thus, the PIAF regimen was able to convert nearly 20% of inoperable lesions into operable. Because about 80% of HCC patients have inoperable disease at presentation (3) , induction chemotherapy with PIAF may significantly increase the overall operability rate of HCC. In the case of hepatoblastoma in children, it is well accepted that preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin or doxorubicin containing combinations can decrease the size of tumor. This facilitates surgical excision and leads to improved treatment results (21 , 22) . Using the PIAF combination, the treatment of HCC in the adults may follow the same path.
Even for patients who have operable disease at presentation and have their tumor successfully resected, there is still a high rate of early recurrence, giving a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 17% and an overall survival rate of 28% from a local study (23) . Postoperative adjuvant PIAF may be an effective option to improve the outlook after operation, but this has to be further investigated by a prospective study.
We also observed that, in seven patients who had a PR, there was enlargement of the nontumorous liver after therapy and, together with regression of the HCC, resection became possible. Similar findings were observed in patients who responded to SIR treatment with yttrium-90 microspheres (19) . In the latter study, four patients who received one course of SIR treatment had regression of tumor, followed by hypertrophy of nontumorous liver. They all subsequently underwent resection of the residual liver lesion, and two patients had a complete pathological remission (19) . Thus, hypertrophy of the nontumorous liver seems to be a sign of effective treatment for both internal radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
The majority of the patients in this trial had very high pretreatment AFP levels and a large tumor size (maximum diameter, 22 cm). An earlier study using combination 5-FU and IFN found a lack of activity in these patients and suggested that a low serum AFP (<50 ng/ml) was a predictor of response (12) . However, all of the responders in the present study had high pretreatment AFP levels, above 20,000 ng/ml in four cases. We have also separated the patients into two groups according to the median pretreatment AFP level and compared RRs and survival times. No differences were found in either end point. Thus, a high AFP level does not seem to be an adverse factor for response to treatment, at least in our Chinese population, where the mean AFP level is higher when compared with low-incidence HCC areas.
The toxicities of this combination were considerable. However, only 12 patients completed the planned six cycles of treatment. Among those patients who received less, the main reason was a lack of response after two to three cycles, rather than toxicity. Most of the patients who had a PR (12 of 13) completed the planned six cycles of therapy. It is possible that those patients who could tolerate the treatment may have had a biologically more favorable disease. There were two treatment-related deaths as a result of neutropenic sepsis. Therefore, close monitoring of cell counts and careful patient selection are very important in administering this regimen. The use of growth factors may be an option to reduce the degree of myelosuppression. As most of our patients had a positive hepatitis B serology (94%) and cirrhosis, they may have been more susceptible to the myelosuppressive effects of the cytotoxic drug regimen (16) . This has been attributed to the inhibitory effect of the virus on bone marrow cells (16) . The other possible explanation may be an altered hepatic metabolism of the myelotoxic drugs due to coexisting chronic liver disease and compromised liver function. Besides hematological toxicity, other toxicities were relatively manageable and tolerable.
In conclusion, PIAF is active in HCC despite moderate toxicities. The use of this therapy may result in the conversion of inoperable disease to operable disease and, in some cases, may result in complete pathological remissions. The role of this combination in improving operability and overall survival warrants further study.
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
-IFN in this trial. | FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong. Phone: 852-2632-2166; Fax: 852-2649-7426; E-mail: waitongleung{at}cuhk.edu.hk ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; RR, response rate; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; AFP,
-fetoprotein; PIAF, combination of cisplatin, doxorubicin, 5-FU, and
-IFN; CT, computed tomography; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, static disease; PD, progressive disease; UR, unclassified response; SIR, selective internal radiation. ![]()
Received 10/ 2/98; revised 3/11/99; accepted 3/17/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatology, 17: 389-394, 1993.[Medline]
-2A-interferon: an active regimen against advanced colorectal carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol., 7: 1769-1775, 1989.[Abstract]
-fetoprotein level in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma as a predictor of response to 5-FU and interferon-
-2b. Cancer (Phila.), 72: 2574-2582, 1993.[Medline]
-interferon in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 19: 136-139, 1996.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Ikeda, T. Okusaka, H. Ueno, C. Morizane, Y. Kojima, S. Iwasa, and A. Hagihara Predictive Factors of Outcome and Tumor Response to Systemic Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2008; 38(10): 675 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V. Tse, M. Hawkins, G. Lockwood, J. J. Kim, B. Cummings, J. Knox, M. Sherman, and L. A. Dawson Phase I Study of Individualized Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 26(4): 657 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Y. Lau and E. C. H. Lai Salvage Surgery Following Downstaging of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma A Strategy to Increase Resectability Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 14(12): 3301 - 3309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. O'Neil and A. P. Venook Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Role of the North American GI Steering Committee Hepatobiliary Task Force and the Advent of Effective Drug Therapy Oncologist, December 1, 2007; 12(12): 1425 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Welsh Radiographically Identified Necrosis After 90Y Microsphere Brachytherapy: A New Standard for Oncologic Response Assessment? Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 765 - 767. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-Y. Chau, W.-Y. Lui, S.-H. Tsay, Y. Chao, K.-L. King, and C.-W. Wu Postresectional Adjuvant Intraportal Chemotherapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case-Control Study Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2006; 13(10): 1329 - 1337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K. Abou-Alfa, L. Schwartz, S. Ricci, D. Amadori, A. Santoro, A. Figer, J. De Greve, J.-Y. Douillard, C. Lathia, B. Schwartz, et al. Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2006; 24(26): 4293 - 4300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. X. Zhu Systemic Therapy of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Hopeful Should We Be? Oncologist, July 1, 2006; 11(7): 790 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. X. Zhu, L. S. Blaszkowsky, D. P. Ryan, J. W. Clark, A. Muzikansky, K. Horgan, S. Sheehan, K. E. Hale, P. C. Enzinger, P. Bhargava, et al. Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2006; 24(12): 1898 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hellerbrand, M. Muhlbauer, S. Wallner, M. Schuierer, I. Behrmann, F. Bataille, T. Weiss, J. Scholmerich, and A.-K. Bosserhoff Promoter-hypermethylation is causing functional relevant downregulation of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) expression in hepatocellular carcinoma Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2006; 27(1): 64 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yeo, T. S. Mok, B. Zee, T. W. T. Leung, P. B. S. Lai, W. Y. Lau, J. Koh, F. K. F. Mo, S. C. H. Yu, A. T. Chan, et al. A Randomized Phase III Study of Doxorubicin Versus Cisplatin/Interferon {alpha}-2b/Doxorubicin/Fluorouracil (PIAF) Combination Chemotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma J Natl Cancer Inst, October 19, 2005; 97(20): 1532 - 1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. X. Zhu, C. S. Fuchs, J. W. Clark, A. Muzikansky, K. Taylor, S. Sheehan, K. Tam, E. Yung, M. H. Kulke, and D. P. Ryan A Phase II Study of Epirubicin and Thalidomide in Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Oncologist, June 1, 2005; 10(6): 392 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kondo, H. Nagano, H. Wada, B. Damdinsuren, H. Yamamoto, N. Hiraoka, H. Eguchi, A. Miyamoto, T. Yamamoto, H. Ota, et al. Combination of IFN-{alpha} and 5-Fluorouracil Induces Apoptosis through IFN-{alpha}/{beta} Receptor in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 11(3): 1277 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yeo, K. C. Lam, B. Zee, P. S. K. Chan, F. K. F. Mo, W. M. Ho, W. L. Wong, T. W. T. Leung, A. T. C. Chan, B. Ma, et al. Hepatitis B reactivation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing systemic chemotherapy Ann. Onc., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 1661 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Z. Patt, M. M. Hassan, R. D. Lozano, T. D. Brown, J. N. Vauthey, S. A. Curley, and L. M. Ellis Phase II Trial of Systemic Continuous Fluorouracil and Subcutaneous Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2003; 21(3): 421 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Szklaruk, P. M. Silverman, and C. Charnsangavej Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, Treatment, and Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 441 - 454. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J Johnson Hepatocellular carcinoma: is current therapy really altering outcome? Gut, October 1, 2002; 51(4): 459 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Z. Patt, M. M. Hassan, R. D. Lozano, K. A. Waugh, A. M. Hoque, A. I. Frome, S. Lahoti, L. Ellis, J. N. Vauthey, S. A. Curley, et al. Phase II Trial of Cisplatin, Interferon {alpha}-2b, Doxorubicin, and 5-Fluorouracil for Biliary Tract Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2001; 7(11): 3375 - 3380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Zhang, M. Chew, E. B. Yang, K. P. Wong, and P. Mack Modulation of Cisplatin Cytotoxicity and Cisplatin-Induced DNA Cross-Links in HepG2 Cells by Regulation of Glutathione-Related Mechanisms Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2001; 59(4): 837 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Eguchi, H. Nagano, H. Yamamoto, A. Miyamoto, M. Kondo, K. Dono, S. Nakamori, K. Umeshita, M. Sakon, and M. Monden Augmentation of Antitumor Activity of 5-Fluorouracil by Interferon {{alpha}} Is Associated with Up-Regulation of p27Kip1 in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2000; 6(7): 2881 - 2890. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |