Clinical Cancer Research Research Funding
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yonemura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yonemura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, T.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 5, 1823-1829, July 1999
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C Expression in the Development of Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer

Yutaka Yonemura1, Yoshio Endo, Hideto Fujita, Sachio Fushida, Itasu Ninomiya, Etsurou Bandou, Keizou Taniguchi, Kouichi Miwa, Sigekazu Ohoyama, Kazuo Sugiyama and Takuma Sasaki

Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine [Y. Y., H. F., S. F., I. N., E. B., K. T., K. M.], and Experimental Therapeutics Cancer Research Institute [Y. E., T. S.], Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920; Virology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104 [K. S.]; and Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo [S. O.], Japan


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Neogenesis of lymphatic vessel and lymphatic invasion is frequently found in the stroma of cancers, but the mechanisms of this phenomenon remain unclear. Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) is known to be the only growth factor for the lymphatic vascular system, and its receptor has been identified as Flt4. To clarify the mechanism of lymphatic invasion in cancer, we studied the expression of VEGF-C and flt4 genes in gastric cancer tissues. VEGF-C mRNA was mainly expressed in primary tumors (15 of 32; 47%), but the frequency of VEGF-C mRNA expression was low in normal mucosa (4 of 32; 13%). In primary tumors, there was a significant relationship between VEGF-C and flt4 mRNA expression. In contrast, Flt4 was mainly expressed on the lymphatic endothelial cells but not in cancer cells. A strong correlation was found between VEGF-C expression and lymph node status, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and tumor infiltrating patterns. Cancer cells in the lymphatic vessels frequently showed intracytoplasmic VEGF-C immunoreactivity. Furthermore, there was a close correlation between VEGF-C tissue status and the grade of lymph node metastasis.

Patients with high expression of VEGF-C protein had a significantly poorer prognosis than did those in low VEGF-C expression group. By the Cox regression model, depth of wall invasion, lymph node metastasis, and VEGF-C tissue status emerged as independent prognostic parameters, and the VEGF-C tissue status was ranked third as an independent risk factor for death. These results strongly suggest that cancer cells producing VEGF-C may induce the proliferation and dilation of lymphatic vessels, resulting in the development of invasion of cancer cells into the lymphatic vessel and lymph node metastasis.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Gastric cancer is still a leading cause of death worldwide (1) . Despite surgeons’ efforts to remove lymph node metastasis by aggressive resection, many patients have died of lymph node metastasis (2, 3, 4) . Actually, >80% of patients with advanced gastric cancer have lymph node metastasis, and the remote lymph nodes, such as the para-aortic nodes, are involved in 20% of gastric cancers. Accordingly, control of lymph node metastasis is the most important strategy for the treatment of gastric cancer.

However, it is very difficult to predict or to diagnose the precise lymph node metastasis preoperatively or intraoperatively (5) . The accuracy of diagnosis of lymph node metastasis by computed tomography and ultrasonography is reported to be low, with a rate of 10–20% (6) . New methods to increase the accuracy rates of detection of lymph node metastasis using molecular biological techniques have been reported. In gastric cancer, we reported previously that the expressions of c-erbB-2 (7) , epidermal growth factor receptor (8) , c-met (9) , autocrine motility factor receptor (10) , and urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its receptor (10) are closely associated with lymph node metastasis. These proteins are now believed to have a great role in the intravasation of cancer cells into lymphatic capillary through destruction of stromal elements and lymphatic vessel or high motile activity. However, the expressions of these genes are not associated with the proliferation of lymphatic vessels. Lymph node metastasis is strongly related with the lymphatic invasion in the primary tumor, and the proliferation and dilation of lymphatic vessels are frequently found in the stroma of gastric cancer with nodal involvement.

More recently, Alitalo and colleagues (11) reported that VEGF-C2 is a potential lymphoangiogenic factor and that this factor can selectively induce the hyperplasia of the lymphatic vasculature.

Here, we report the close relationship between VEGF-C expression and lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published article on the relationship between VEGF-C tissue status and lymph node metastasis in cancer. This study suggests that the detection of VEGF-C protein in the primary gastric cancer may represent a potential risk of lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Lines.
The nine human cancer cell lines used in this study were from the following sources: prostatic adenocarcinoma PC-3 and gastric carcinomas MKN-28, MKN-45, KATO III, MKN-7, and AZ521 were from the Japanese Cancer Research Resources Bank; gastric carcinomas KKLS and NKPS were kindly provided by Dr. M. Mai (Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan); and gastric cancer cell line TMK-1 was a kind gift from E. Tahara (Department of Pathology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan). All cell lines except for AZ521 were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heated-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) at 37°C and 5% CO2; AZ521 was incubated with MEM with 10% fetal bovine serum.

Patients and Tumor Samples.
One hundred seventeen patients with primary gastric cancer who were diagnosed and treated in the Department of Surgery II, Kanazawa University Hospital, between 1990 and 1997 were entered into the study. All of the patients underwent gastrectomy with lymph node dissection. Among them, 25 patients had early gastric cancer (T1 tumor), in which the tumor invasion is confined to the mucosa or submucosa.

All of the resected primary tumors and regional lymph nodes were histologically examined by H&E staining according to the general rules of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (12) .

Immediately after resection of primary tumor, samples of ~5 mm in diameter were taken from 32 primary tumors and each adjacent normal mucosa, and these samples were stored at -80°C. In addition, small pieces of tissue ~5–8 mm in diameter were sampled from the primary tumor and fixed in acetone at -20°C overnight, dehydrated in acetone at 4°C for 15 min and acetone at room temperature for 15 min, and then cleared in methyl benzoate for 30 min and in xylene in a vacuum evaporating emitter (AMeX method; Ref. 13 ).

Antibody and Immunohistochemistry.
Anti-VEGF-C (C-20) and anti-Flt4 antibodies (15 , 21) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-VEGF-C antibody (C-20) is an affinity-purified goat polyclonal antibody that is raised against a peptide corresponding to amino acids 136–155 mapping at the COOH terminus of the VEGF-C precursor of human origin. Anti-Flt4 antibody is an affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against a peptide corresponding to amino acids 1279–1298 mapping at the COOH terminus of the precursor form of Flt4 of human origin.

Immunohistochemistry was performed as follows. Paraffin sections (3–4 µm thick) were deparaffinized and then placed in a solution of absolute methanol and 2% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min. They were subsequently washed in distilled water, rinsed for PBS, and treated with 10-fold diluted blocking serum (rabbit) for 20 min for blocking of nonspecific reaction. The slides were then incubated overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber with anti-VEGF-C antibody diluted 1:100 in PBS. After the overnight treatment, the slides were incubated with biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG for 20 min (Vectastain ABC kits; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and then with premixed ABC (Vector Laboratories) reagent for 20 min. Immunostaining was performed by incubating the slides in diaminobenzidine (DAKO) solution containing 0.06 mM diaminobenzidine and 2 mM hydrogen peroxide in 0.05% PBS (pH 7.6) for 5 min. After chromogen development, the slides were washed, counterstained with methyl green, dehydrated with alcohol and xylene, and mounted in a routine fashion. Negative control were performed in all cases by omitting the first antibody. Only cases in which at least 20% of tumor cells were immunoreactive were scored as positive.

RT-PCR.
RT-PCR analysis was carried out according to the modifications by Conboy et al. (14) . Briefly, total RNAs were extracted from primary gastric cancer and the normal mucosa, using Isogen (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan; Ref. 16 ). The prepared RNA (1 µg) was mixed with the oligo(dT) (50 pmol), incubated for 15 min at 68°C, and then quickly chilled in an ice bath for 5 min. The RNA samples were reverse-transcribed at 42°C for 60 min into first-strand cDNA in reverse transcription solution [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 40 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM each dNTP, 225 µg/ml BSA, 5 mM DTT, 20 units of RNasin (Promega, Madison, WI), and 4 units of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Life Sciences, St. Petersburg, FL)] with a total volume of 20 µl. The cDNA samples were incubated at 95°C for 5 min to inactivate the reverse transcriptase and then chilled. The samples were amplified by the addition of 80 µl of PCR mixture [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 40 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM each dNTP, 50 pmol of each sense and antisense primer, and 2.5 units of Taq polymerase (Takara, Tokyo)]. The amplification was performed for 1.5 min at 94°C, 2 min at 48°C, and 2 min at 72°C for 3 cycles, followed by 25 cycles of 40 s at 94°C, 1.5 min at 48°C, and 1.3 min at 72°C. The products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels and then transferred to a nylon membrane filter. The transferred products were hybridized overnight to a 32P-end-labeled probe specific for the target cDNA fragment (Southern blotting). The autoradiogram was exposed for 4–5 h with two intensifying screens at -80°C.

Specific primers for the VEGF-C gene, targeting an 867-bp fragment, were: VEC-S3, 5'-AGTTTTGCCAATCACACTTCCTG-3'; and VEC-A3, 5'-GTCATTGGCAGAAAACCAGT-CTT-3'. The probe oligonucleotide was VEC-A2 (5'-CTTTCTGTACATTCACAGGCACA-3'). Primers for the flt4 gene were: Flt-4-1, 5'-AGCCATTCATCAACAAGCCT-3'; and Flt-4-2, 5'-GGCAACAGCTGGATGTCATA-3' (PCR product, 298 bp). The probe was Flt-4-probe (5'-TTCCTTTCCAACCCCTTCCTGGTGCACATC-3'; Ref. 17 ). As internal standards, the ß-actin gene and the transferrin receptor gene were used. Primer pairs specific to the ß-actin gene (18) , targeting a 865-bp fragment, were used: ß-act-5, 5'-TTGAAGGTAGTTTCGTGGAT-3'; and ß-act-11, 5'-GAAAATCTGGCACCACACCTT-3'. ß-act-7 (5'-ACTGACTACCTCATGAAGAT-3') was used as the probe. Primers for transferrin receptor (TFR), targeting a 415-bp fragment, were: TFR2-S, 5'-ACAGACTCTACATGTAGGAT-3'; and TFR4-A, 5'-AAACCTTGAAGTTGCTGGTA-3'. The probe was TFR4-P (5'-TATCCCTCTAGCCATTCAGT-3'; Ref. 19 ).

Western Blot Analysis.
Twelve µl of protein sample (total protein 20 µg) were mixed with 6 µl of sample buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.5), 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, and 0.1% bromphenol blue] prior to separation by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. After completion of electrophoresis, samples were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane filters (Immobilon; Millipore, Bedford, MA).

Immunoreactivity were performed using anti-VEGF antibody (C-20) and anti-VEGFR-3 (Flt4) antibody as primary antibodies and a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. The transferred samples were conjugated with anti-VEGF-C antibody (C-20; 1:1000), anti-Flt4 antibody (1:1000), and anti-ß-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) for 2 h at room temperature. As a negative control, primary VEGF-C antibody, which was preabsorbed with synthetic VEGF-C peptide (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) overnight at a ratio of 1:1, was reacted with the membrane filter. VEGF-C peptide was used as a positive control. After washing with TBS-Tween 20 with 0.05% skim milk to block a non-specific reaction, membranes were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated Affipure F(ab')2 fragment rabbit antigoat IgG F(ab') fragment (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratory, Inc.; 1:5000), and antirabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase linked F(ab') fragment (Amersham Life Science; 1:5000) for VEGF-C, Flt4, and ß-actin for 40 min at room temperature, respectively. The antigen and antibody complexes were detected using ECL Western blotting detection reagent (Amersham Life Science).

Data Presentation and Statistical Analysis.
All statistical calculations were carried out using SPSS statistical software. Data are presented as means ± SD. The {chi}2 test was used to analyze data. The outcomes of the different groups of patients were compared by the generalized Wilcoxon test. A multivariate model using Cox stepwise regression analysis was used to evaluate the statistical strength of independent association between selected covariates and patient survival. Values with a P of <=0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
VEGF-C and flt4 mRNA Expression in Gastric Cancer Cell Lines.
Among eight gastric cancer cell lines, NKPS, TMK-1, AZ521, and MKN-45 expressed VEGF-C mRNA, but VEGF-C expression was not detected in KATO III, MKN-7, KKLS, and MKN-28 (Fig. 1)Citation . However, flt4 mRNA was expressed from KKLS only. PC-3 overexpressed not only VEGF-C but also flt4 mRNA (Fig. 1)Citation .



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. VEGF-C and flt4 mRNA expression in eight gastric cancer cell lines and PC-3.

 
VEGF-C and flt4 mRNA Expression in Gastric Cancer and Normal Mucosa.
A series of 32 gastric cancers and adjacent normal mucosa was examined for the expression of VEGF-C and flt4 mRNA by RT-PCR (Fig. 2)Citation . VEGF-C was expressed in 15 (47%) and 4 (13%) of 32 gastric cancers and the normal gastric mucosa, respectively (Table 1)Citation . In contrast, flt4 mRNA was expressed in 17 (53%) and 20 (63%) of 32 gastric cancers and normal gastric mucosa, respectively.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. VEGF-C mRNA expression in primary gastric cancers (Lanes T) and adjacent normal mucosa (Lanes N).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Correlation between VEGF-C and flt4 mRNA expression in 31 primary tumors

 
There was a significant correlation between VEGF-C mRNA expression and flt4 mRNA expression in primary tumors (Table 1)Citation .

VEGF-C and Flt4 Protein Expression in Gastric Cancer and Normal Mucosa (Western Blot Analysis).
In gastric cancer cell lines, C-20 recognized main band of Mr 58,000 precursor of VEGF-C and proteolytic forms of Mr 31,000, 29,000, and 21,000 molecules (Fig. 3)Citation . In the clinical specimens, a Mr 31,000 molecule was predominant (Fig. 4)Citation , and the intensity of VEGF-C expression in cancer tissue was usually stronger than that of the normal counterpart. By preabsorption of VEGF-C antibody with synthetic VEGF-C peptide, Mr 55,000 and 31,000 bands, corresponding to VEGF-C peptides and VEGF-C, respectively, disappeared.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. VEGF-C protein expression in gastric cancer cell lines and VEGF-C peptide (55 kDa).

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. VEGF-C protein expression in primary gastric cancers, adjacent normal mucosa, and VEGF-C peptides. As a negative control, primary VEGF-C antibody, which was preabsorbed with synthetic VEGF-C peptide overnight at a ratio of 1:1, was reacted with the membrane filter. VEGF-C peptide was used as a positive control. Lanes N, normal gastric mucosa; Lanes T, primary tumor; Lane LN, lymph node metastasis.

 
In gastric cancer cell lines, however, Flt4-specific rabbit IgG did not recognize a Mr 125,000 band that corresponded to Flt4 protein (Fig. 5)Citation . In contrast, a Mr 125,000 Flt4 band was detected in the clinical specimen.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Flt-4 expression in gastric cancer cell lines and PC-3.

 
Immunohistochemical Study of VEGF-C and Flt4 Expression.
In normal gastric epithelium, VEGF-C was weakly expressed in the cytoplasm of parietal cells, but almost all epithelial cells, stromal cells, and smooth muscle did not show VEGF-C immunoreactivity (Fig. 6)Citation . In gastric cancers, VEGF-C was observed as diffuse cytoplasmic staining (Figs. 7Citation and 8Citation ). Among 117 examined tumors, 30 (26%) tumors showed high expression of VEGF-C protein.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. VEGF-C expression in normal gastric mucosa.

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 7. VEGF-C protein expression in differentiated adenocarcinoma.

 


View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 8. VEGF-C protein expression in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma.

 
Among 27 primary tumors, cancer cells were positive for Flt4 immunoreactivity only in one tumor, which was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The other 26 tumors did not show any Flt4 immunoreactivity in cancer cells. However, cancer cell stroma always showed Flt4 immunoreactivity, and Flt4 was strongly expressed in the cytoplasm of lymphatic endothelial cells (Fig. 9)Citation .



View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 9. Flt4 protein expression in lymphatic endothelial cells.

 
Correlation between VEGF-C and Flt4 Expression and Clinicopathological Parameters.
Table 2Citation shows a correlation between clinicopathological parameters and VEGF-C mRNA expression in the primary tumors. VEGF-C mRNA expression in primary tumor showed a statistically significant relationship with lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion. However, there was no relationship between flt4 mRNA expression in primary tumors and lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, or venous invasion (Table 3)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Correlation between clinicopathological parameters and VEGF-C mRNA expression in tumor tissue

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Correlation between flt4 mRNA expression and lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and vessel invasion

 
As shown in Table 4Citation , a strong correlation was found between VEGF-C protein expression and lymph node status, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and infiltrating patterns. Tumors with high expression of VEGF-C protein had significantly higher incidence of the involvement of the lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). In addition, the incidence of positive lymphatic invasion in tumors with high expression of VEGF-C was significantly higher than that in tumors with low VEGF-C expression.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Correlation between VEGF-C tissue status and clinicopathological parameters

 
Table 5Citation shows the correlation between VEGF-C tissue status and the grade of lymph node metastasis. Distant lymph node stations were more frequently involved in VEGF-C-positive tumors than in VEGF-C-negative tumors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5 Correlation between VEGF-C tissue status and grade of lymph node metastasis

 
Correlation of VEGF-C Tissue Status and Prognosis.
Fig. 10Citation shows the survival curves of patients according to the VEGF-C tissue status. Patients with high expression of VEGF-C (n = 30) had a significantly poorer prognosis than did those in low VEGF-C expression group (n = 87). When the VEGF-C tissue status and six clinicopathological parameters, which have been considered as the good prognostic indicators, were entered into the regression model, depth of wall invasion (T), lymph node metastasis (N), and VEGF-C tissue status emerged as independent prognostic parameters (Table 6)Citation . Among seven prognosticators, VEGF-C tissue status was ranked third as an independent risk factor for death.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 10. Survival curves of patients with gastric cancer according to VEGF-C protein expression.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 6 Clinicopathological and VEGF-C tissue status as prognostic factors in 117 gastric cancer patients

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
VEGF family is the only growth factor that is specific for vascular endothelial cells, and it consists of VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and VEGF-C. Among them, VEGF-C is ranked first as a lymphoangiogenic factor (20) , which induces proliferation of lymphatic endothelial cells and lymphatic vessels via activating VEGFR-3 (Flt4) or VEGFR-2 (KDR) on the cell membrane of endothelial cells (21) . However, the activity in proliferating endothelial cells via VEGF-C and VEGFR-2 loop is considered to be decreased in adult tissue. Accordingly, the main receptor of VEGF-C in adult tissue is considered Flt4. Oh et al. (22) reported that VEGF-C can induce proliferation of lymphatic endothelial cells and development of new lymphatic sinuses on the avian chorioallantoic membrane. It has been considered that the mechanism of the neogenesis of the lymphatic channel is activation of VEGFR-3 by VEGF-C, which is abundant in the proliferating endothelial cells of vascular sprouts and branching vessels of embryonic tissues (23) .

Neogenesis and dilation of the lymphatic vessels are often found in the stroma of gastric cancer tissue, and intravasation of cancer cells in the lymphatic vessels is known as lymphatic invasion. Thus far, the mechanism of the dilation of lymphatic vessels in gastric cancer tissue has been speculated to be the obstruction of lymphatic channel by the cancer cell emboli. However, the mechanisms of the lymphoangiogenesis in cancer tissue have remained unclear.

It is generally accepted that the cancer cell invasion into the lymphatic vessels is established by the destruction of stroma around the lymphatic vessels via activation of matrix-digesting enzymes, which are produced by cancer cells or fibroblasts (24 , 25) , and by the enhanced motility activity of cancer cells via motility factor and their receptor, such as AMF/AMFR (26) or c-met/HGF (9 , 27) .

This study clearly demonstrated the close relationship between VEGF-C expression and lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis. Tumors with high expression of VEGF-C had more remote lymph node involvement than did those with low VEGF-C expression. Considering that VEGF-C is selectively expressed in cancer cells but not in normal gastric mucosa or stromal elements, VEGF-C produced from gastric cancer may induce lymphovascular neogenesis and dilation of lymphatic vessel in the stroma of primary tumor (23) . Immunohistological study has shown that the VEGF-C receptor flt4 was expressed on the lymphatic endothelial cells in the stroma of primary tumors and normal mucosa. Furthermore, there was a close correlation between flt4 and VEGF-C mRNA expression in the primary tumors, and immunohistochemical examination showed that cancer cells in the lymphatic vessels frequently expressed VEGF-C. In contrast, flt4 mRNA was not detected in eight examined gastric cancer cell lines, and this finding was in accordance with immunohistological evidence showing that almost all gastric cancer cells did not express Flt4. Furthermore, Flt4 immunoreactivity was only found on the lymphatic endothelial cells in the stroma of primary tumors and stomach wall. These results strong suggest the possibility that VEGF-C produced by cancer cells stimulate the lymphoangiogenesis and dilation of lymphatic vessels by activating Flt4, which is expressed on the lymphatic endothelial cells. Joukov et al. (28) reported that mature VEGF-C (Mr 21,000) also increases the permeability of lymphatic vessels as well as the migration and proliferation of endothelial cells. Our Western blot analysis in the clinical specimens showed that the mature VEGF-C was found in the cancer cells. Accordingly, VEGF-C may enhance the intravasation of cancer cells via loosening the mutual attachment of lymphatic endothelial cells (28) . These results strongly suggest that cancer cells producing VEGF-C may have a higher potential for the intravasation into the lymphatic vessel, resulting in the lymph node involvement.

This study also demonstrated that the patients with VEGF-C-positive tumor had a poorer prognosis than did those with VEGF-C-negative tumor. Furthermore, VEGF-C tissue status was confirmed to be a significantly independent factor for poor prognosis. It has been speculated that the reason is the prevalent progression by the higher lymphatic spread and more infiltrating spread in VEGF-C-positive tumors than in the VEGF-C-negative tumors. Further studies of the proliferative and motility activity of VEGF-C-producing tumors should be performed.

In summary, this study demonstrates the close relationship between VEGF-C tissue status and lymphatic spread and postoperative prognosis in gastric cancer. VEGF-C-producing cancer cells may induce the proliferation and dilation of the lymphatic vessel in the stroma around them. In these circumstances, cancer cells can easily invade the lymphatic vessel, even if these cells have low production of matrix-digesting enzymes and scatter factors. The preoperative determination of VEGF-C tissue status by RT-PCR or immunohistochemistry using endoscopically biopsied materials may be useful in deciding the extent of surgical lymph node resection and postoperative chemotherapy.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kanazawa Unversity, Takara-Machi 13-1, Kanazawa 920, Japan. Phone: 81 762 65 2000; Fax: 81 762 34 4260; E-mail: yonemu{at}med.kanazawa-u.ac.jp Back

2 The abbreviations used are: VEGF-C, vascular endothelial growth factor C; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; VEGFR, VEGF receptor. Back

Received 12/ 7/98; revised 4/ 7/99; accepted 4/13/99.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Stanley K., Stjernsward J., Koroltchouk V. Cancer of the stomach, lung, and breast: mortality trends and control strategies. World Health Stat. Q., 41: 107-114, 1988.[Medline]
  2. Maruyama K., Gunven P., Okabayashi K., Sasako M., Kinoshita T. Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer: general pattern in 1931 patients. Ann. Surg., 210: 596-602, 1989.[Medline]
  3. Yonemura Y., Katayama K., Kamata T., Fushida S., Segawa M., Ohoyama S., Miwa K., Miyazaki I. Surgical treatment of advanced gastric cancer with metastasis in para-aortic lymph nodes. Int. Surg., 76: 222-225, 1991.[Medline]
  4. Dent D. M., Madden M. V., Price S. K. Randomized comparison of R1 and R2 gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Br. J. Surg., 75: 110-112, 1988.[Medline]
  5. Noguchi Y., Imada T., Matsumoto A., Coit D. G., Brennan M. F. Radical surgery for gastric cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Cancer (Phila.)., 64: 2053-2062, 1989.[Medline]
  6. Murata Y., Suzuki S., Sugiyama S., Hayashi K., Yamamoto K., Sasagawa T., Kitamura Y., Suzuki M., Ide H., Yamada A., Suzuki H., Hanyu F. Role of ultrasonography in determining treatment for m and sm cancer of GI tract. Depiction of the muscularis mucosa (in Japanese). Jpn. J. Gastroenterol., 26: 2512-2516, 1993.
  7. Yonemura Y., Ninomiya I., Ohoyama S., Fushida S., Kimura H., Tsugawa K., Kamata T., Yamaguchi A., Miyazaki I., Endou Y., Tanaka M., Sasaki T. Correlation of c-erbB-2 protein expression and lymph node status in early gastric cancer. Oncology, 49: 363-367, 1992.[Medline]
  8. Yonemura Y., Sugiyama K., Ninomiya I., Fushida S., Tsugawa K., Hirono Y., Yamaguchi A., Miyazaki I., Endou Y., Tanaka M., Sasaki T. Evidence of autocrine mechanism in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Int. J. Oncol., 2: 643-648, 1993.
  9. Kaji M., Yonemura Y., Harada S., Kanako T., Miwa K., Miyazaki I., Yamamoto H. Antisense oligonucleotides against c-met mRNA inhibit the growth of human gastric cancer cells. Antisense Res. Dev., 5: 99-100, 1995.
  10. Taniguchi K., Yonemura Y., Nojima N., Hirono Y., Fushida S., Fujimura T., Miwa K., Endou Y., Yamamoto H., Watanabe H. The relation between the growth patterns of gastric carcinoma and the expression of hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-met), autocrine motility factor receptor, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor. Cancer (Phila.)., 82: 2112-2122, 1998.[Medline]
  11. Jeltsch M., Kaipainen A., Joukov V., Meng X., Lakso M., Rauvala H., Swartz M., Fukumura D., Jain R. K., Alitalo K. Hyperplasia of lymphatic vessels in VEGF-C transgenic mice. Science (Washington DC), 276: 1423-1425, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer Kanehara Shuppan Co., Ltd. Tokyo 1993.
  13. Sato Y., Mukai K., Watanabe S., Goto M., Shimosato Y. The AMeX method: a simplified technique of tissue processing and paraffin embedding with improved preservation of antigens for immunostaining. Am. J. Pathol., 125: 431-435, 1986.[Abstract]
  14. Conboy J. G., Chan J., Mohandas N., Kan Y. W. Multiple protein 4.1 isoform produced by alternative splicing in human erythroid cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85: 9062-9065, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Galland F., Karamysheva A., Pebusque M., Borg J., Rottapel R., Dubreuil P., Rosnet O., Burnbaum D. The FLT4 gene encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase related to the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. Oncogene, 8: 1233-1240, 1993.[Medline]
  16. Chomczynski P., Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem., 162: 156-159, 1987.[Medline]
  17. Nomura M., Yamagishi S., Harada S., Hayashi Y., Yamashita T., Yamashita J., Yamamoto H. Possible participation of autocrine and paracrine vascular endothelial growth factors in hypoxia-induced proliferation of endothelial cells and pericytes. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 28316-28324, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ng S., Gunning P., Eddy R., Ponte P., Leavitt J., Shows T., Kedes L. Evolution of the functional human ß-actin gene and its multi-pseudogene family. conversation of noncoding regions and chromosomal dispersion pseudogenes. Mol. Cell. Biol., 5: 2720-2732, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Schneider C., Owen M. J., Banville D., Williams J. G. Primary structure of transferrin receptor deduced from mRNA sequence. Nature (Lond.), 311: 675-678, 1984.[Medline]
  20. Jetsch M., Kaipainen A., Joukov V., Meng X. M., Lakso M., Rauvala H., Swartz M., Fukumura D., Jain R. K., Alitalo K. Hyperplasia of lymphatic vessels in VEGF-C transgenic mice. Science (Washington DC), 276: 1423-1425, 1997.
  21. Joukov V., Pajusolo K., Kaipainen A., Chilov D., Lahtinen I., Kukk E., Saksela O., Kalkkinen N., Alitalo K. A novel vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF-C, is a ligands for the Flt4 (VEGFR-3) and KDR (VEGFR-2) receptor tyrosine kinases. EMBO J., 15: 290-298, 1996.[Medline]
  22. Oh S. J., Jeltsch M. M., Birkenhager R., McCarthy J. E. G., Weich H. A., Christ B., Alitalo K., Wilting J. VEGF and VEGF-C: specific induction of angiogenesis and lymphoangiogenesis in the differentiated avian chorioallantoic membrane. Dev. Biol., 188: 96-109, 1997.[Medline]
  23. Millauer B., Wizingmann-Voos S., Schnurch H., Martinez R., Moller N. P., Risau P. H., Ullrich A. High affinity VEGF binding and developmental expression suggest flk-1 as a major regulator of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Cell, 71: 835-846, 1993.
  24. Yonemura Y., Nojima N., Kaji M., Fujimura T., Itoh H., Ninomiya I., Miyazakai I., Endou Y., Sasaki Y. T. E-cadherin and urokinase-type plasminogen activator tissue status in gastric carcinoma. Cancer (Phila.)., 76: 941-953, 1995.[Medline]
  25. Liotta LA. Tumor invasion and metastasis: role of the extracellular matrix. Cancer Res., 46: 1-7, 1986.[Free Full Text]
  26. Hirono Y., Fushida S., Yonemura Y., Yamamoto H., Watanabe H., Raz A. Expression of autocrine motility factor receptor correlates with disease progression in human gastric cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 74: 2003-2007, 1996.[Medline]
  27. Cooper C. S., Park M., Blair D. G., Tainsky M. A., Huebner K., Croce C. M. Molecular cloning of new transforming gene from a chemically transformed human cell line. Nature (Lond.), 311: 29-32, 1984.[Medline]
  28. Joukov V., Sorsa T., Kumar V., Jeltsch M., ClaessonWelsh L., Cao Y., Saksela O., Kalkkinen N., Alitalo K. Proteolytic processing regulates receptor specificity and activity of VEGF-C. EMBO J., 16: 3898-3911, 1997.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Matsui, Y. Funahashi, T. Uenaka, T. Watanabe, A. Tsuruoka, and M. Asada
Multi-Kinase Inhibitor E7080 Suppresses Lymph Node and Lung Metastases of Human Mammary Breast Tumor MDA-MB-231 via Inhibition of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Receptor (VEGF-R) 2 and VEGF-R3 Kinase
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 14(17): 5459 - 5465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Iwata, M. R. Kano, A. Komuro, M. Oka, K. Kiyono, E. Johansson, Y. Morishita, M. Yashiro, K. Hirakawa, M. Kaminishi, et al.
Inhibition of Cyclooxygenase-2 Suppresses Lymph Node Metastasis via Reduction of Lymphangiogenesis
Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10181 - 10189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. F. Donoghue, F. L. Lederman, B. J. Susil, and P. A.W. Rogers
Lymphangiogensis of normal endometrium and endometrial adenocarcinoma
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1705 - 1713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. Kim, S. Sohn, Y. Chae, Y. Cho, H-I Bae, G Yan, J. Park, M-H Lee, H. Chung, and W Yu
Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms associated with prognosis for patients with gastric cancer
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1030 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Yano, Y. Fujii, A. Iwai, S. Kawakami, Y. Kageyama, and K. Kihara
Glucocorticoids suppress tumor lymphangiogenesis of prostate cancer cells.
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 12(20): 6012 - 6017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Juttner, C. Wissmann, T. Jons, M. Vieth, J. Hertel, S. Gretschel, P. M. Schlag, W. Kemmner, and M. Hocker
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-D and Its Receptor VEGFR-3: Two Novel Independent Prognostic Markers in Gastric Adenocarcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2006; 24(2): 228 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
F. Nagashima, N. Boku, A. Ohtsu, S. Yoshida, T. Hasebe, A. Ochiai, Y. Sakata, H. Saito, Y. Miyata, I. Hyodo, et al.
Biological Markers as a Predictor for Response and Prognosis of Unresectable Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Irinotecan and Cisplatin
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2005; 35(12): 714 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
X.-M. Yu, C.-Y. Lo, W.-F. Chan, K.-Y. Lam, P. Leung, and J. M. Luk
Increased Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Correlates with Cervical Lymph Node Metastases
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2005; 11(22): 8063 - 8069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. Renyi-Vamos, J. Tovari, J. Fillinger, J. Timar, S. Paku, I. Kenessey, G. Ostoros, L. Agocs, I. Soltesz, and B. Dome
Lymphangiogenesis Correlates with Lymph Node Metastasis, Prognosis, and Angiogenic Phenotype in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 11(20): 7344 - 7353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Z. Chen, M. L. Varney, M. W. Backora, K. Cowan, J. C. Solheim, J. E. Talmadge, and R. K. Singh
Down-Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Cell Growth Factor-C Expression Using Small Interfering RNA Vectors in Mammary Tumors Inhibits Tumor Lymphangiogenesis and Spontaneous Metastasis and Enhances Survival
Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 65(19): 9004 - 9011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Lin, A. S. Lalani, T. C. Harding, M. Gonzalez, W.-W. Wu, B. Luan, G. H. Tu, K. Koprivnikar, M. J. VanRoey, Y. He, et al.
Inhibition of Lymphogenous Metastasis Using Adeno-Associated Virus-Mediated Gene Transfer of a Soluble VEGFR-3 Decoy Receptor
Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 65(15): 6901 - 6909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Ueda, Y.-C. Hung, Y. Terai, K. Kanda, M. Kanemura, H. Futakuchi, H. Yamaguchi, D. Akise, M. Yasuda, and M. Ueki
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C Expression and Invasive Phenotype in Ovarian Carcinomas
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 11(9): 3225 - 3232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Suzuki, T. Watabe, M. Kato, K. Miyazawa, and K. Miyazono
Roles of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 signaling in differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cell-derived vascular progenitor cells into endothelial cells
Blood, March 15, 2005; 105(6): 2372 - 2379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. F. Jordan, M. Runquist, N. Raghunand, R. J. Gillies, W. R. Tate, G. Powis, and A. F. Baker
The Thioredoxin-1 Inhibitor 1-Methylpropyl 2-Imidazolyl Disulfide (PX-12) Decreases Vascular Permeability in Tumor Xenografts Monitored by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 11(2): 529 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Kurahara, S. Takao, K. Maemura, H. Shinchi, S. Natsugoe, and T. Aikou
Impact of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C and -D Expression in Human Pancreatic Cancer: Its Relationship to Lymph Node Metastasis
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 10(24): 8413 - 8420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Rubbia-Brandt, B. Terris, E. Giostra, B. Dousset, P. Morel, and M. S. Pepper
Lymphatic Vessel Density and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C Expression Correlate with Malignant Behavior in Human Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 10(20): 6919 - 6928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. P. Padera, Y. Boucher, R. K. Jain, L. M. Wein, P. E. Holden, and D. H. Kirn
Correspondence re: S. Maula et al., Intratumoral Lymphatics Are Essential for the Metastatic Spread and Prognosis in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Cancer Res., 63: 1920-1926, 2003.
Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8555 - 8557.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Sugiyama, S. Dan, Y. Yoshida, F. Akiyama, K. Sugiyama, Y. Hirai, M. Matsuura, S. Miyata, M. Ushijima, K. Hasumi, et al.
A Large-Scale Gene Expression Comparison of Microdissected, Small-Sized Endometrial Cancers with or without Hyperplasia Matched to Same-Patient Normal Tissue
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 9(15): 5589 - 5600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
J. J. Homer, M. G. Prentice, L. Cawkwell, M. Birchall, J. Greenman, and N. D. Stafford
Angiogenesis and the Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors A and C in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Piriform Fossa
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, October 1, 2003; 129(10): 1110 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. J. Hung, D. G. Ginzinger, R. Zarnegar, H. Kanauchi, M. G. Wong, E. Kebebew, O. H. Clark, and Q.-Y. Duh
Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C in Benign and Malignant Thyroid Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3694 - 3699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Yokoyama, D. S. Charnock-Jones, D. Licence, A. Yanaihara, J. M. Hastings, C. M. Holland, M. Emoto, A. Sakamoto, T. Sakamoto, H. Maruyama, et al.
Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-D and Its Receptor, VEGF Receptor 3, as a Prognostic Factor in Endometrial Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2003; 9(4): 1361 - 1369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P.-W. Tsai, S.-G. Shiah, M.-T. Lin, C.-W. Wu, and M.-L. Kuo
Up-regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C in Breast Cancer Cells by Heregulin-beta 1. A CRITICAL ROLE OF p38/NUCLEAR FACTOR-kappa B SIGNALING PATHWAY
J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 2003; 278(8): 5750 - 5759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
M. Ishikawa, J. Kitayama, S. Kazama, and H. Nagawa
Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C and D (VEGF-C and -D) is an Important Risk Factor for Lymphatic Metastasis in Undifferentiated Early Gastric Carcinoma
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2003; 33(1): 21 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]