
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
Departments of Medical Oncology [S. C., V. C., G. C.] and Pathology [M. P. S., P. M.], Azienda Ospedaliera "Ospedale S. Salvatore," 61100 Pesaro, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, "Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro," Genova, Italy [C. A., D. D., C. B.]; Department of Pathology, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16100 Genova, Italy [G. T.]; Departments of Radiotherapy/Oncology [S. B.] and Pathology [A. B.], Azienda Ospedaliera "Ospedale S. Gerardo," 20052 Monza, Italy
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The importance of TS in determining fluoropyrimidine cytotoxicity has been established in both preclinical and clinical studies (2 , 3) . After preliminary observations in small numbers of patients (4 , 5) , Leichman et al. (6) showed a statistically significant association between TS gene expression and the clinical response to infusional 5-FU in disseminated colorectal cancer. We have used a polyclonal antibody to recombinant human TS to measure TS protein expression immunohistochemically and obtained similar results in a series of patients treated by alternating bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU (7) .
In the present study, our aim was to investigate whether the correlation between TS expression and response to 5FU is valid for bolus 5FU regimens. The schedule of 5FU administration was in fact shown to influence the mechanism of action of this agent, and incorporation into RNA may be the dominant mechanism of cytotoxicity with bolus administration (8) . The predictivity of TS expression for the clinical response may thus be limited with this schedule. Because we have observed substantial intrapatient variation in TS levels (between primary tumors and the corresponding metastases and even between different metastatic lesions in the same patient) and other authors have found higher TS levels in lung compared with liver metastases (9) , a secondary aim of this study was to compare TS expression between abdominal recurrences and liver metastases.
| PATIENTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Immunohistochemistry
Sample Preparation.
Paraffin-embedded archival samples derived from diagnostic biopsies of abdominal recurrences or liver metastases from colon cancer were used for this study. Six tissue sections (each 1 µm in thickness) were cut from each block, deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated with graded ethanol, and immersed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS). Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide in distilled water for 15 min.
TS Analysis.
TS protein expression was evaluated by the avidin-biotin complex immunohistochemical technique, using a rabbit polyclonal antibody to recombinant human TS. The antibody was produced in the laboratory of Dr. Frank Maley (Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY) and used previously to localize and quantitate normal and mutant TS in human sarcoma cells lines by Western blotting (12)
and to measure TS expression in human tumor samples with results consistent with those obtained by mRNA quantitation (9)
. The tissue sections were heated in a microwave oven at 300 W for 10 min, cooled, and stored in TBS at pH 7.6. To block nonspecific binding of the primary antibody, a normal rabbit serum (DAKO X901) dilution in TBS was used for 20 min. After removing the blocking solution, the TS antibody (2 mg/ml) was applied for 60 min in a humidified chamber at room temperature. Negative control studies were performed without applying the primary antibody. Under these conditions, a complete interexperiment reproducibility in TS assessment by the same investigator (i.e., TS expression repeatedly measured on the same sample in different experiments) was obtained. The sections were then incubated with biotin-conjugated, swine anti-rabbit immunoglobulins for 20 min (DAKO-E353), followed by the avidin-biotinylated peroxidase complex for 30 min. After developing the color reaction product with a freshly prepared diaminobenzidine chromogen solution for 5 min, the sections were counterstained with light hematoxylin for 1 min, dehydrated in a series of ethanols, cleared in xylene, and mounted with glass coverslips using Permount. Sections known to stain positively were included in each run as positive controls. Slides were then examined under a light microscope and scored independently by two of the authors (D. D. and G. T), blinded to both the clinical and pathological data. Only tumor cells with cytoplasmatic staining were counted as positive. TS expression was quantitated using a visual grading system, based on the intensity of staining, and classified into five groups from 0 (undetectable staining) to 4 (very high intensity of staining). For the purpose of correlation with clinical data, intensity levels 0 to 2 were grouped together and considered low expression, whereas levels 3 and 4 were considered high expression. The agreement in TS evaluation between the two observers was >90%. In the two cases of disagreement, a final score was determined by consensus after reexamination. When heterogeneous levels of TS expression were found within a tumor (in multiple sections from different paraffin-embedded blocks of the same tumor), the levels of TS expression of that lesion were defined according to the highest TS score that was recorded.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The proportion of cases with high levels of TS expression was significantly higher in abdominal recurrences (18 of 22, 82%) compared with liver metastases (9 of 19, 47%; P = 0.02). Accordingly, the degree of TS immunoreactivity tended to be higher in abdominal masses compared with liver metastases (median TS score, 3 versus 2, P = not significant).
Intratumoral TS protein expression was inversely correlated with response to chemotherapy (Table 2
;
2 = 16.32; P = 0.001, Mantel test for linear association). All of the patients achieving an objective response had low levels of TS expression (scores 02), whereas 18 of 23 failures occurred in patients with high TS levels (scores 34). The difference in the proportion of objective responses between patients with low (complete response + partial response: 7 of 14, 50%) and high (complete response + partial response: 0 of 27) TS levels was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). The relationship between TS levels and clinical response remained significant when TS expression was graded from 0 to 4 (response rate: 80, 25, 40, 0, and 0%, with a TS score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively;
2 = 26.18; P = 0.01, Mantel test for linear association).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although high TS expression effectively predicted resistance to 5FU, in our study low TS expression did not necessarily result in a clinical response; all responding patients had low TS expression, but a subset of patients with low TS did not respond to treatment. Of note, an
50% failure rate has been reported also among patients with low TS mRNA. These patients may have other mechanisms of resistance that the favorable condition of low TS is insufficient to overcome.
In conclusion, these results confirm the ability of TS protein expression to predict for response to 5FU, even using a bolus schedule, and provide further evidence for the existence of different patterns of TS expression among different metastatic sites. This could have a significant impact on the choice of drugs and the design of new treatments in advanced colon cancer, changing the therapeutic approach from a general to an individual treatment strategy.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera "Ospedale S. Salvatore" v. Lombroso, 61100 Pesaro, Italy. Fax: 39 0721 364094. ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: 5FU, 5-fluorouracil; LV, leucovorin; TS, thymidylate synthase. ![]()
3 C. Aschele, personal communication. ![]()
Received 3/ 9/99; revised 5/26/99; accepted 6/ 2/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Ohrling, D. Edler, M. Hallstrom, P. Ragnhammar, and H. Blomgren Detection of Thymidylate Synthase Expression in Lymph Node Metastases of Colorectal Cancer Can Improve the Prognostic Information J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5628 - 5634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kamoshida, H. Matsuoka, T. Ishikawa, K. Maeda, R. Shimomura, K.-i. Inada, and Y. Tsutsumi Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Thymidylate Synthase (TS) and p16INK4a in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Implication of TS Expression in 5-FU-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2004; 34(10): 594 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lecomte, J.-M. Ferraz, F. Zinzindohoue, M.-A. Loriot, D.-A. Tregouet, B. Landi, A. Berger, P.-H. Cugnenc, R. Jian, P. Beaune, et al. Thymidylate Synthase Gene Polymorphism Predicts Toxicity in Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving 5-Fluorouracil-based Chemotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2004; 10(17): 5880 - 5888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kornmann, W. Schwabe, S. Sander, M. Kron, J. Strater, S. Polat, E. Kettner, H. F. Weiser, W. Baumann, H. Schramm, et al. Thymidylate Synthase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase mRNA Expression Levels: Predictors for Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant 5-Fluorouracil Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 9(11): 4116 - 4124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Bertino and D. Banerjee Is the Measurement of Thymidylate Synthase to Determine Suitability for Treatment with 5-Fluoropyrimidines Ready for Prime Time? Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2003; 9(4): 1235 - 1239. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Johnston, A. B. Benson III, P. Catalano, M. S. Rao, P. J. O'Dwyer, and C. J. Allegra Thymidylate Synthase Protein Expression in Primary Colorectal Cancer: Lack of Correlation With Outcome and Response to Fluorouracil in Metastatic Disease Sites J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2003; 21(5): 815 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Ichikawa, H. Uetake, Y. Shirota, H. Yamada, N. Nishi, Z. Nihei, K. Sugihara, and R. Hirayama Combination of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase and Thymidylate Synthase Gene Expressions in Primary Tumors as Predictive Parameters for the Efficacy of Fluoropyrimidine-based Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2003; 9(2): 786 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Farrugia, H. E. R. Ford, D. Cunningham, K. D. Danenberg, P. V. Danenberg, J. Brabender, A. D. McVicar, G. W. Aherne, A. Hardcastle, K. McCarthy, et al. Thymidylate Synthase Expression in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Predicts for Response to Raltitrexed Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2003; 9(2): 792 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Aschele, D. Debernardis, R. Bandelloni, S. Cascinu, V. Catalano, P. Giordani, S. Barni, D. Turci, G. Drudi, S. Lonardi, et al. Thymidylate synthase protein expression in colorectal cancer metastases predicts for clinical outcome to leucovorin-modulated bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil but not methotrexate-modulated bolus 5-fluorouracil Ann. Onc., December 1, 2002; 13(12): 1882 - 1892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Edler, B. Glimelius, M. Hallstrom, A. Jakobsen, P. G. Johnston, I. Magnusson, P. Ragnhammar, and H. Blomgren Thymidylate Synthase Expression in Colorectal Cancer: A Prognostic and Predictive Marker of Benefit From Adjuvant Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2002; 20(7): 1721 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. C. Neuteboom, P. L. Karjian, C. R. Boyer, M. Beryt, M. Pegram, G. M. Wahl, and H. M. Shepard Inhibition of Cell Growth by NB1011 Requires High Thymidylate Synthase Levels and Correlates with p53, p21, Bax, and GADD45 Induction Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2002; 1(6): 377 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Sloan, R. M. Goldberg, D. J. Sargent, D. Vargas-Chanes, S. Nair, S. S. Cha, P. J. Novotny, M. A. Poon, M. J. O'Connell, and C. L. Loprinzi Women Experience Greater Toxicity With Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2002; 20(6): 1491 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Copur, M. Capadano, J. Lynch, T. Goertzen, T. McCowan, R. Brand, and M. Tempero Alternating Hepatic Arterial Infusion and Systemic Chemotherapy for Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Trial Using Intermittent Percutaneous Hepatic Arterial Access J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2001; 19(9): 2404 - 2412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Aschele, D. Debernardis, G. Tunesi, F. Maley, and A. Sobrero Thymidylate Synthase Protein Expression in Primary Colorectal Cancer Compared with the Corresponding Distant Metastases and Relationship with the Clinical Response to 5-Fluorouracil Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2000; 6(12): 4797 - 4802. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |