| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Department of Surgery II, Osaka University Medical School, Osaka 565-0871, Japan [J. O., H. Y., Y. F., M. T., M. K., S. No., S. O., H. N., K. D., K. U., M. S., S. Na., M. M.]; Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease, Osaka 537-8511, Japan [O. I.]; and Department of Pathology, School of Allied Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan [N. M.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
COX3 is a rate-limiting enzyme involved in the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandin H2, the precursor of several molecules including prostaglandins, prostacyclin, and thromboxanes. Two COX genes, COX-1 and COX-2, have been identified that share a >60% identity at the amino acid level (8) . COX-1 is constitutively expressed in many tissues and is responsible for various physiological functions including the cytoprotection of the stomach, vasodilatation in the kidney, and the production of a proaggregatory prostanoid, thromboxane, by the platelets. On the other hand, COX-2 is an inducible immediate early gene and was originally found to be induced by inflammation and ovulation or by a variety of other stimuli, such as mitogens, cytokines, and growth factors (9, 10, 11) . Overexpression of COX-2 has been demonstrated in human inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohns disease, ulcerative colitis, and Helicobacter pylori-infectious gastritis (12, 13, 14) .
Recent studies have highlighted the potential role of COX-2 in carcinogenesis. In 1994, the induction of COX-2 was reported in carcinomas of the colon, and in subsequent years, increased levels of COX-2 were found in carcinomas of the stomach, breast, esophagus, and lung (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21) . In contrast, the levels of COX-1 are mostly similar between normal and tumor tissues. Importantly, overexpression of COX-2 in human carcinomas appears to be of functional significance because double knockout mice for adenomatous polyposis coli and COX-2 genes showed a reduction in the size and frequency of intestinal polyps (22) . There is also cumulative evidence that selective COX-2 inhibitors prevent carcinogenesis in experimental animals (23) and that these compounds induce apoptosis in several types of carcinoma cells (24) . These findings suggest that COX-2 may be associated with carcinogenesis and/or the progression of certain types of human malignancies. In fact, various studies are currently being conducted based on the potential effect of COX-2 inhibitors on the prevention and/or therapy of cancers (25, 26, 27) .
Little is known about the expression of COX-2 in human pancreatic carcinoma. In the present study, we examined the expression of COX-2 mRNA by RT-PCR and determined the distribution of COX-2 protein by immunohistochemistry in human pancreatic tumors.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents.
Rabbit polyclonal antihuman COX-2 antibody and its blocking peptide, which was used as an immunogen (17 amino acids, position 251267) for generation of this antibody, were obtained from Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Co. (Gunma, Japan; Ref. 20
). Recombinant COX-2 protein was obtained from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI) and used as a positive control in Western blot analysis.
Immunohistochemistry.
Tissue sections (4-µm thick) were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated. Heat antigen retrieval was performed as described previously (29)
. Slides were then processed for immunohistochemistry on the Teck Mate Horizon automated staining system (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA; Refs. 30
and 31
) using the Vectastain ABC peroxidase kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA; Ref. 29
). In the primary antibody reaction step, slides were incubated with the COX-2 antibody (final concentration, 5 µg/ml) for 1 h at room temperature. For positive controls, sections of colon cancer expressing the COX-2 protein were included in each staining procedure. For negative controls, nonimmunized rabbit IgG (Vector Laboratories) or Tris-buffered saline was used as a substitute for the primary antibody to distinguish false positive responses from nonspecific binding to IgG or the secondary antibody. In addition, preabsorbed antibody with an excess amount of immunogens abolished the staining. Staining was repeated twice to avoid possible technical errors, but similar results were obtained.
Evaluation of COX-2 Immunostaining.
All immunostained sections were coded and evaluated without prior knowledge of the clinical and pathological parameters. In each section, five high-power fields were selected at random, and a total number of at least 700 cells were evaluated. The results were expressed as the percentage of positively stained cells. The intensity of staining was estimated on a scale from 03 (0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong). Pancreatic islets that showed intense COX-2 expression served as an internal control. All slides were interpreted by two investigators (J. O. and H. Y.) on three different occasions. Evaluations were mostly similar, and <10% disagreement between the investigators was noted. In case of disagreement, the final evaluation of such sections was determined by consensus using a multihead microscope.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR.
RNA extraction was carried out with Trizol reagent using a single-step method, and cDNA was generated with avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI), as described previously (32)
. Semiquantitative analysis of the expression of COX-2 or COX-1 mRNA was performed using the multiplex RT-PCR technique. In this assay, we used a housekeeping gene, PBGD, as an internal standard. This gene is favored over ß-actin or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as a reference gene for competitive PCR amplification because the presence of pseudogenes for the latter housekeeping genes can produce false positive signals from genomic DNA contamination (33
, 34)
. In addition, to minimize possible inter-PCR differences, PCR was performed with COX-2 or COX-1 and PBGD primers in an identical tube, in an unsaturated condition. PCR was performed in a 25-µl reaction mixture containing 1 µl of cDNA template, 1x Perkin-Elmer PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.8 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 0.8 µM of each primer for COX-2 or 80 nM of each primer for COX-1, and 80 nM PBGD, and 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (AmpliTaq Gold; Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.). The PCR primers used for detection of COX-1, COX-2, and PBGD cDNAs were synthesized as described previously, and amplified products were 303, 305, and 127 bp, respectively (35
, 36)
. The conditions for multiplex PCR were one cycle of denaturing at 95°C for 12 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 62°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The electrophoresed PCR products were scanned by densitometry, and the relative value of the COX-2 or COX-1 band as compared to the PBGD band was calculated in each sample.
Western Blot Analysis.
Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (37)
. Briefly, 100 µg of the total protein from tissues and 2.5 µg/ml COX-2 antibody were used for this assay.
Statistical Analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed using the Statview J software (version 4.5). The
2 and Fishers exact tests were used to examine the association between COX-2 expression and clinicopathological parameters. P < 0.05 denoted the presence of a statistically significant difference.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
We then determined the immunoreactive score for each individual carcinoma case by multiplying the percentage of positive cells by the staining intensity, as reported previously (38
, 39)
. The immunoreactive score ranged from 10300, with an average value of 180. Based on this analysis, patients with malignant tumors were classified into two groups: (a) 27 high expressers; and (b) 25 low expressers, using a cutoff value equivalent to the above median value. Using this classification, we did not find any significant difference between the two groups based on various clinicopathological parameters, such as age, sex, histological grade, tumor size, nodal involvement, metastasis, stage (UICC, the International Union Against Cancer, classification), and site of the tumor (Table 2)
.
RT-PCR
To examine the level of mRNA for COX-2, a RT-PCR assay was performed using the BxPC3, PCI6, and PSN1 pancreatic carcinoma cell lines and 16 paired nontumor and tumor tissues (13 malignant tumors and 3 benign tumors). Each of the three carcinoma cell lines expressed a 305-bp band for COX-2 and a 303-bp band for COX-1, with constitutive expression of PBGD (Fig. 2
, top and bottom panels). To estimate the expression of COX-2 in tumor tissues relative to that in the matched normal tissues, we calculated the T:N ratio representing the expression of COX-2 in the tumor (COX-2/PBGD) relative to that in normal tissue (COX-2/PBGD). In the three benign samples, the COX-2 T:N ratio was 1.00, 0.43, and 0.39. In 13 carcinoma samples, the value ranged from 0.4637.0 (<1.0, two cases; 1.02.0, four cases; and >2.0, seven cases). When overexpression of COX-2 mRNA was defined as a T:N ratio of >2.0, COX-2 mRNA was overexpressed in 7 of 13 (54%) carcinoma cases. There was no significant difference in the level of COX-1 mRNA between normal and tumor tissues, in benign tumors as well as malignant tumors (Fig. 2
, bottom panel). These assays were repeated at least twice, and concordant results were obtained.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In pancreatic carcinoma tissues, the cellularity of the carcinoma cells was relatively low (approximately 1050%), but we still found that COX-2 expression was increased at both the RNA and protein levels in most of the pancreatic carcinomas compared with paired normal tissues by RT-PCR and Western blot analyses. RT-PCR analyses indicated that 7 of 13 (54%) carcinoma cases displayed an overexpression of COX-2 mRNA. In contrast, the expression of COX-1 mRNA was similar in cancer and normal tissues. Furthermore, the results of mRNA analysis paralleled those of immunohistochemistry. Thus, approximately 44% of the carcinoma samples exhibited a strong expression of the COX-2 protein, whereas normal pancreatic ducts or acinar cells showed little or no COX-2 expression. Up to 90% of carcinoma cases showed moderate to strong COX-2 expression (intensity 2 or 3). Furthermore, although a clinicopathological survey displayed no correlation between COX-2 expression and several clinical parameters, COX-2 was expressed in various histological types of carcinomas, i.e., poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma as well as moderately to well differentiated adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma, intraductal papillary adenocarcinoma, and cystadenocarcinoma. Because several mechanistic studies suggest that carcinoma cells overexpressing COX-2 (but not those lacking COX-2) are sensitive to COX-2 inhibitors (49 , 50) , it is potentially important that COX-2 is expressed in the majority of human pancreatic carcinomas, irrespective of histological type. This aspect may be characteristic of pancreatic carcinomas because in carcinomas of the colon, lung, and liver (16 , 20 , 21 , 51) , COX-2 expression is dependent on the histological grade or type. During the preparation of the manuscript, other investigators showed that COX-2 expression was increased in 9 of 10 biopsy specimens of pancreatic carcinoma (52) . The present study extended their findings with a number of pancreatic carcinomas (n = 52) that had various clinicopathological features. Furthermore, our data revealed that COX-2 expression was not affected by several parameters that were associated with tumor progression, such as tumor size, lymph node or distant metastasis, and clinical stage. We also examined COX-2 expression in a subset of benign tumor samples. Compared to malignant tumors, these benign tumors expressed lower levels of COX-2 mRNA and protein. These findings suggest that COX-2 may be a marker for the malignant potential of pancreatic tumors, although its function remains to be clarified.
Previous studies have shown a low basal level of COX-2 mRNA in normal pancreatic tissues (36) . Consistent with this finding, the present data indicated that COX-2 protein was localized exclusively to islets that occupied a minimal area of the normal pancreas, but not in epithelial cells of the duct or in acinar cells. Our immunohistochemical data on COX-2 expression in the islets are consistent with recent reports from other laboratories (53 , 54) , and islet cells served well as inner controls for COX-2 staining in a series of sections. The significance of COX-2 expression in the islets is unclear at present. Experiments using COX-2 inhibitors may allow a better understanding of the possible role of COX-2 in pancreatic islet physiology and the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus because prostaglandin E2 negatively regulates pancreatic islet function, i.e., glucose-induced insulin secretion. During the observation of COX-2 staining in carcinomatous tissues, we found that islet cells always showed a high expression of COX-2, even when acinar cells changed into fibrous tissues. This finding is of potential importance with regard to the association of COX-2 with carcinogenesis because we have previously demonstrated that the transplantation of pancreatic islets to the submandibular glands led to carcinoma formation in N-nitrosobis(2-oxopropyl)amine-treated hamsters (55) .
In conclusion, we report overexpression of COX-2 in various histological types of pancreatic carcinomas. Our data suggest that COX-2 inhibitors might be potentially effective against the development and/or progression of human pancreatic car-cinoma.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Cancer Research for New 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan (to S. Na.), by Grants-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (to S. Na.), and by a Grant-in-Aid for Basic Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (to M. M.). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Surgery II, Osaka University Medical School, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: COX, cyclooxygenase; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PBGD, porphobilinogen deaminase; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; T:N, tumor:normal. ![]()
Received 3/19/99; revised 5/25/99; accepted 5/25/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and phorbol ester. J. Clin. Investig., 93: 493-498, 1994.
716 knockout mice by inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Cell, 87: 803-809, 1996.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Danovi, H. H. Wong, and N. R. Lemoine Targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer Br. Med. Bull., September 1, 2008; 87(1): 97 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Sackett, I. Bairati, F. Meyer, E. Jobin, S. Lussier, A. Fortin, M. Gelinas, A. Nabid, F. Brochet, and B. Tetu Prognostic Significance of Cyclooxygenase-2 Overexpression in Glottic Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 67 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K J Schmitz, R Callies, J Wohlschlaeger, R Kimmig, F Otterbach, J Bohr, H-S Lee, A Takeda, K W Schmid, and H A Baba Overexpression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 is an independent predictor of unfavourable outcome in node-negative breast cancer, but is not associated with protein kinase B (Akt) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK1/2, p38) activation or with Her-2/neu signalling pathways J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2006; 59(7): 685 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhi, L. Wang, J. Zhang, C. Zhou, F. Ding, A. Luo, M. Wu, Q. Zhan, and Z. Liu Significance of COX-2 expression in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1214 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lu, W. Ouyang, and C. Huang Inflammation, a Key Event in Cancer Development Mol. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 4(4): 221 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Juuti, J Louhimo, S Nordling, A Ristimaki, and C Haglund Cyclooxygenase-2 expression correlates with poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2006; 59(4): 382 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Kim, V. Bossuyt, T. Ponn, D. Lannin, and B. G. Haffty Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Postmastectomy Chest Wall Relapse Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2005; 11(14): 5199 - 5205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Santini, B. Vincenzi, G. Tonini, S. Scarpa, F. Vasaturo, C. Malacrino, F. Vecchio, D. Borzomati, S. Valeri, R. Coppola, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 Overexpression Is Associated with a Poor Outcome in Resected Ampullary Cancer Patients Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 11(10): 3784 - 3789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ito, M. Duxbury, E. Benoit, T. E. Clancy, M. J. Zinner, S. W. Ashley, and E. E. Whang Prostaglandin E2 Enhances Pancreatic Cancer Invasiveness through an Ets-1-Dependent Induction of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 64(20): 7439 - 7446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gehrmann, M. Brunner, K. Pfister, A. Reichle, E. Kremmer, and G. Multhoff Differential Up-Regulation of Cytosolic and Membrane-Bound Heat Shock Protein 70 in Tumor Cells by Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2004; 10(10): 3354 - 3364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N A Mohammed, S A El-Aleem, H A El-Hafiz, and R F T McMahon Distribution of constitutive (COX-1) and inducible (COX-2) cyclooxygenase in postviral human liver cirrhosis: a possible role for COX-2 in the pathogenesis of liver cirrhosis J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2004; 57(4): 350 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W. Chang, D. H. Kim, D. P. Kowalski, J. A. Burleson, Y. H. Son, L. D. Wilson, and B. G. Haffty Prognostic Significance of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 10(5): 1678 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Nathoo, G H Barnett, and M Golubic The eicosanoid cascade: possible role in gliomas and meningiomas J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2004; 57(1): 6 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ermert, C. Dierkes, and M. Ermert Immunohistochemical Expression of Cyclooxygenase Isoenzymes and Downstream Enzymes in Human Lung Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2003; 9(5): 1604 - 1610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Hardman Omega-3 Fatty Acids to Augment Cancer Therapy J. Nutr., November 1, 2002; 132(11): 3508S - 3512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hennig, X.-Z. Ding, W.-G. Tong, M. B. Schneider, J. Standop, H. Friess, M. W. Buchler, P. M. Pour, and T. E. Adrian 5-Lipoxygenase and Leukotriene B4 Receptor Are Expressed in Human Pancreatic Cancers But Not in Pancreatic Ducts in Normal Tissue Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2002; 161(2): 421 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Wallace Nutritional and Botanical Modulation of the Inflammatory Cascade--Eicosanoids, Cyclooxygenases, and Lipoxygenases-- As an Adjunct in Cancer Therapy Integr Cancer Ther, March 1, 2002; 1(1): 7 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Anderson and J. E. Harris Selected Features of Nonendocrine Pancreatic Cancer Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2001; 226(6): 521 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shono, P. J. Tofilon, J. M. Bruner, O. Owolabi, and F. F. Lang Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Human Gliomas: Prognostic Significance and Molecular Correlations Cancer Res., June 1, 2001; 61(11): 4375 - 4381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-B. Su, Y. Motoo, J. L. Iovanna, M.-J. Xie, H. Mouri, K. Ohtsubo, Y. Yamaguchi, H. Watanabe, T. Okai, F. Matsubara, et al. Expression of p8 in Human Pancreatic Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2001; 7(2): 309 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A Tatsuguchi, C Sakamoto, K Wada, T Akamatsu, T Tsukui, K Miyake, S Futagami, T Kishida, Y Fukuda, N Yamanaka, et al. Localisation of cyclooxygenase 1 and cyclooxygenase 2 in Helicobacter pylori related gastritis and gastric ulcer tissues in humans Gut, June 1, 2000; 46(6): 782 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Takemasa, H. Yamamoto, M. Sekimoto, M. Ohue, S. Noura, Y. Miyake, T. Matsumoto, T. Aihara, N. Tomita, Y. Tamaki, et al. Overexpression of CDC25B Phosphatase as a Novel Marker of Poor Prognosis of Human Colorectal Carcinoma Cancer Res., June 1, 2000; 60(11): 3043 - 3050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Shamma, H. Yamamoto, Y. Doki, J. Okami, M. Kondo, Y. Fujiwara, M. Yano, M. Inoue, N. Matsuura, H. Shiozaki, et al. Up-Regulation of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Squamous Carcinogenesis of the Esophagus Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2000; 6(4): 1229 - 1238. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kondo, H. Yamamoto, H. Nagano, J. Okami, Y. Ito, J. Shimizu, H. Eguchi, A. Miyamoto, K. Dono, K. Umeshita, et al. Increased Expression of COX-2 in Nontumor Liver Tissue Is Associated with Shorter Disease-free Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 1999; 5(12): 4005 - 4012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||