
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Preclinical Pharmacology |
Gene Therapy Program [K. K., J. L. B., J. T. D., I. D., T. V. S., P. R., V. K., D. T. C.] and Departments of Otolaryngology [D. A. K., W. R. C., G. E. P.] and Clinical Pathology [R. P. B.], University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2ß1 and
3ß1 class are frequently overexpressed in SCCHN. Furthermore, these integrins recognize the RGD peptide motif. On this basis, we applied an adenoviral vector genetically modified to contain such a peptide within the HI loop of the fiber protein as a means to alter viral tropism. Studies confirmed that the CAR-independent gene delivery achieved via this strategy allowed enhanced gene transfer efficiencies to SCCHN tumor cells. Importantly, this strategy could achieve preferential augmentation of gene transfer in tumor cells compared with normal cells. The ability to achieve enhanced and specific gene transfer to tumor cells via adenoviral vectors has important implications for gene therapy strategies for SCCHN and for other neoplasms in general. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To this end, a number of distinct cancer gene therapy approaches have been developed for SCCHN that are predicated upon direct gene delivery to tumor cells in situ (1 , 2) . For achievement of this gene delivery, recombinant adenoviral vectors have been used, based on their superior in vivo efficacy characteristics (7, 8, 9, 10) . In this regard, a number of distinct approaches have been tried in both animal models and human clinical trials. These approaches have included delivery of the p53 tumor suppressor gene or toxin-encoding genes, such as herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase and cytosine deaminase (11, 12, 13, 14) . Thus, the basic paradigm of these gene therapy interventions assumes in vivo transduction of adequate efficiency to realize the potential therapeutic benefit of the delivered transgenes.
Whereas adenoviral vectors are understood to exhibit superior levels of in vivo gene transfer compared with available alternative vector systems, their present level of efficiency may nonetheless be suboptimal for SCCHN gene therapy applications (15) . In several reported human clinical trials based on in vivo gene delivery, relative resistance of target tissues to adenoviral infection has been noted (16) . Deficiency of the primary Ad receptor, CAR, has been understood to be the biological basis of this phenomenon (17 , 18) . There is a significant disparity between the adenoviral vector efficacies observed in vitro using cell lines and the tumor transduction rates achievable in the context of in vivo gene delivery schemas (19) . In addition, it has been observed in human clinical trials that dose-rated vector toxicities may limit the overall therapeutic index achievable with adenoviral vectors (20 , 21) . Strategies that increase the gene transfer efficacy of adenoviral vectors may allow the use of lower vector doses and improve the overall therapeutic potential of gene therapy approaches.
We have endeavored to modify the tropism of adenoviral vectors to achieve cell-specific targeting to tumor cells as a means of improving the overall feasibility of these cancer gene therapy strategies (22) . Retargeting approaches based on immunological modification of the virus have achieved cell-specific gene delivery via routing the virus to nonnative cellular entry pathways (18 , 23 , 24) . In addition, we have achieved Ad retargeting using genetic strategies to alter tropism. These latter methods are based on genetic alterations of the virion capsid proteins as a means to modify the interaction of the vector with target cells (25 , 26) . In the current study, we demonstrate that SCCHN tumor cells exhibit relative resistance to Ad vectors based on the deficiency of the primary Ad receptor, CAR. Furthermore, we show that we can circumvent this resistance by using an adenoviral vector genetically modified to allow CAR-independent cellular targeting (27) . Importantly, this retargeting was achieved via dysregulated cellular receptors characteristic of SCCHN, thereby providing a level of tumor cell-specific gene delivery. These studies provide the rationale to modify current SCCHN gene therapy paradigms by incorporating the next generation of adenoviral vectors that use modified gene delivery characteristics. Such vector modifications are also clearly relevant to a variety of other cancer gene therapy approaches.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recombinant Adenoviral Vectors.
A recombinant E1A/B-deleted Ad (29)
expressing the luciferase reporter gene (AdCMVLuc) was provided Dr. R. D. Gerard (University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium). A similar Ad that also expresses luciferase from the cytomegalovirus promoter but contains an integrin targeting peptide within the HI loop (Ad5lucRGD) was constructed as described previously (27)
. Recombinant Ads were propagated on the permissive 293 cell line, purified using a cesium chloride gradient, and subsequently plaque titered on 293 cells using standard methods (30)
. Virus stocks were stored at -80°C until use.
Immunohistochemical Reagents.
Mouse anti-CAR monoclonal antibody (RmcB) prepared as ascites fluid was obtained from Dr. R. L. Crowell (Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, PA; Ref. 31
). The anti-
Vß3 mAb LM609, the anti-
5ß5 mAb P1F6, the anti-
2ß1 mAb BHA2.1, and the anti-
3ß1 mAb MAB1992 were purchased from Chemicon International Inc. (Temecula, CA). Control mouse IgG and FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 fragments of antimouse IgG were purchased from Sigma.
Purification of Ad5 Knob Protein.
The knob domain of Ad5 fiber was expressed in Escherichia coli with an N-terminal 6xHis tag using the pQE30 expression vector (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described previously (32)
. In brief, the knob domain plus the last repeat of the shaft domain of the fiber gene was cloned into BamHI-HindIII-digested pQE30, resulting in plasmid pQE.KNOB5. Recombinant knob was expressed in E. coli M15(pREP4) cells harboring pQE.KNOB5 and purified on Ni-NTA agarose columns (Qiagen). The ability of the recombinant knob to block 2infection by Ad was verified as described previously (32)
.
Ad Infection Assays.
To assess adenoviral vector infection, 105 cells of each cell line were plated in triplicate into each well of 12-well plates in the presence of 1 ml of culture media. The cells were then incubated overnight to allow adherence. Prior to infection, the cells were incubated in 300 µl/well of the media containing 2% FBS, with or without knob protein at a final concentration of 20 µg/ml for 15 min. Infection complexes mixed in a final volume of 300 µl containing AdCMVLuc or Ad5lucRGD (10250 pfu/cell) or AdCMVLuc/knob protein (20 µg/ml) or Ad5lucRGD/knob protein (20 µg/ml) were added to each well. The cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 1 h, washed with PBS (pH 7.4), and then supplemented with 1 ml of complete media. Forty-eight h after the infection, the cells were rinsed with PBS and assayed for luciferase expression by enzyme assay or by in situ hybridization of luciferase mRNA. For all luciferase enzyme assays, the cells were lysed in 200 µl of lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI). Ten µl of each sample were subsequently mixed with 50 µl of Promega luciferase assay reagent according to the manufacturers instructions, and duplicate determinations of triplicate samples were assayed in a Berthold luminometer. For primary tissues, the minced aliquots of tissue were incubated in 1 ml of Opti-MEM with or without 20 µg/ml knob protein for 30 min and then infected by AdCMVLuc or Ad5lucRGD (5 x 107 pfu/10 mg tissue) for 1 h. After replacing the media (Opti-MEM containing antibiotics), the tissue was incubated for an additional 24 h. The tissue was then homogenized and centrifuged. The collected supernatant was then used for the luciferase assay and the measurement of protein concentration. All assays were performed in triplicate.
Indirect Flow Cytofluorometry.
Cultured cells were washed with PBS and harvested with Versene (Life Technologies, Inc.) for 15 min. Detached cells were centrifuged and resuspended in PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.1% sodium azide (1% BSA/PBS) at a concentration of 105 cells/ml. The cells were then incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h on ice. Subsequently, the cells were washed and incubated with FITC-conjugated antimouse IgG for an additional 1 h. After washing with 1% BSA/PBS, the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.
In Situ Hybridization of Luciferase mRNA.
A protocol for the in situ hybridization technique is described in detail elsewhere (33
, 34)
. Briefly, cells were plated into each well of 12-well plates in the presence of 1 ml of culture media. After the cells reached subconfluence, they were transduced by AdCMVLuc or Ad5lucRGD at 250 pfu/cell for 1 h. After an additional 48 h of incubation, the cells were rinsed with PBS and resuspended in Versene (Life Technologies, Inc.). After centrifugation, the cells were finally resuspended in diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated PBS at a concentration of 106 cells/ml. Cells in 100 µl of each sample were attached to the glass slide by a cytospin. The cells were then rinsed with PBS and fixed for 1 h in 3% paraformaldehyde at room temperature. Fixed cells were treated with 0.2 M HCl to inhibit endogenous alkaline phosphatase activity, acetylated with 0.1 M triethanolamine and acetic anhydride to decrease background staining, and hybridized overnight at 50°C with 400 pg/ml/kb of relevant riboprobe in hybridization solution. The hybridization solution consisted of 50% formamide, 4x SSC, 1x Denhardts solution (Sigma), 500 mg/ml heat-denatured herring sperm DNA, 250 mg/ml yeast tRNA, and 10% dextran sulfate. After hybridization, the cells were rinsed with 2x SSC followed by sodium chloride-Tris-EDTA buffer and treated with RNase A (20 mg/ml in sodium chloride-Tris-EDTA) for 30 min at 37°C to remove excess nonhybridized probe. Next, a series of progressive stringency washes were performed with 2x SSC, 1x SSC, 0.5x SSC, and 0.15 M Tris-NaCl (pH 7.5) with normal horse serum. The cells were then stained with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antidigoxigenin antibody at a concentration of 1:5000 for 1 h. The cells were washed with Tris-NaCl and transferred to a basic Tris buffer with MgCl2 (pH 9.5). Finally, the slides were incubated with the enzyme substrate solution (nitroblue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate; Boehringer Mannheim) overnight in dark, humid chambers at 4°C. The color reaction was stopped by rinsing the slides in Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In these studies, the control HeLa cell line demonstrated high levels of vector-mediated gene delivery, as anticipated (Fig. 1)
. However, the human SCCHN cell lines were significantly less susceptible to Ad-mediated infection than the control HeLa cells (Fig. 1)
. In this regard, the observed luciferase activity was 4.8 x 105 RLU/mg protein for FaDu and 6.9 x 105 RLU/mg protein for SCC-25. These reporter gene magnitudes were 4.0% and 5.7%, respectively, of the levels observed for HeLa. The SCCHN cell line SCC-4 exhibited a slightly higher degree of susceptibility, demonstrating luciferase levels that were 38% of those observed for HeLa. Parallel studies carried out with knob competition exhibited a >90% blockade in both the HeLa and SSCHN cell lines. Thus, the observed levels of transduction were accomplished via CAR-dependent pathways. These data indicated that SSCHN cells were significantly less susceptible than HeLa to adenoviral vector-mediated gene transfer. Furthermore, these data suggested that the major cellular factor involved in adenoviral vector infection of human SCCHN cell lines was the primary adenoviral receptor, CAR.
|
Vß3 and
Vß5 on Human SCCHN Cell Lines.
Vß3 and
Vß5 class (37, 38, 39)
. Relative resistance to adenoviral vectors has been noted to occur based on a deficiency of either or both of these cellular receptor classes (17
, 18
, 40)
. On this basis, we evaluated the relative levels of both receptor classes in the resistance of SCCHN cell lines as compared with levels in the highly permissive HeLa cell line. Direct flow cytofluorometry was carried out using antibodies specific for CAR and the indicated integrins.
These studies demonstrated that the positive control HeLa cells expressed high levels of CAR (Fig. 2B)
. The positive ratio and mean fluorescent intensity of CAR on HeLa were 99.6% and 57.9, respectively. In contrast, the levels of CAR detected for the SCCHN cell lines were greatly reduced. In this regard, the mean fluorescent intensity of CAR in FaDu, SCC-4, and SCC-25 cells was 8.9, 36.2, and 25.3, respectively (Fig. 2
, F, J, and N). In contrast, the
Vß3 and
Vß5 integrin levels did not differ from those of HeLa by a margin as substantial as that noted for CAR. On this basis, we concluded that the relative CAR deficiency in SCCHN cells provided the principal explanation for the relative resistance of these cells to adenoviral vector transduction.
|
2ß1 and
3ß1 Integrins on Human SCCHN Cell Lines.
2ß1 and
3ß1. Of note, these integrins function as potential receptors with recognition of RGD peptide motifs. We have previously demonstrated the capacity of RGD peptide motifs genetically incorporated into the adenoviral capsid to alter vector tropism (27)
. On this basis, we rationalized that the presence of these candidate receptors on the human SCCHN cell lines might serve as targets for gene transfer in the present context. We thus used a similar flow cytofluorometry analysis to determine the presence of the
2ß1 and
3ß1 integrins (Fig. 3)
|
We thus used the genetically modified Ad encoding the luciferase gene, Ad5lucRGD, for transduction of the human SCCHN cell lines. Direct comparison was made in these studies with the nonmodified control virus AdCMVLuc. Of note, the reporter gene is driven by the cytomegalovirus promoter in both of these Ad vectors. The application of Ad5lucRGD to HeLa cells resulted in a 4-fold augmentation of gene transfer compared with the control virus AdCMVLuc (Fig. 4A)
. The addition of recombinant knob had no significant inhibitory effect on gene transfer via Ad5lucRGD, confirming that the augmented levels of transgene expression represented transduction that had occurred via non-CAR pathways. We next applied Ad5lucRGD to the human SCCHN cell lines. In these studies, a very dramatic augmentation in gene transfer was noted in these otherwise Ad-refractory cells. Specifically, the FaDu (Fig. 4B)
, SCC-4 (Fig. 4C)
, and SCC-25 (Fig. 4D)
cells show 35-, 18-, and 77-fold enhancements in gene transfer, respectively. Significantly, knob competition had no effect on the gene transfer to these cells accomplished via the Ad5lucRGD vector. Thus, the achievement of CAR-independent gene transfer to SCCHN cells provides a means to overcome CAR deficiency in SCCHN cells and potentiated a highly augmented level of gene transfer.
|
|
In these studies, primary tumor cells exhibited a relative resistance to the adenoviral vector AdCMVLuc as compared with the human SCCHN cell lines (Fig. 6)
. These findings validate the frequently noted disparity in primary tumor and cell line data and highlight the difficulty in achieving meaningful transduction rates to human tumors in situ. We next compared these findings with the Ad5lucRGD virus. Of note, Ad5lucRGD accomplished augmented gene transfer to this otherwise refractory tumor target. Specifically, augmentations of 2.4- and 5.8-fold were noted in two independent isolates of primary tumor. Competition studies with knob confirmed that the observed augmentations occurred via the achievement of CAR-independent gene transfer. Thus, for fresh primary tumor material, which represents the clinically relevant study substrate for vector analysis, we have shown that CAR-independent gene transfer allows significant augmentation of gene transfer to human SCCHN tumors. Of further note, no infection differential between AdCMVLuc and Ad5lucRGD could be noted in normal buccal mucosa (Fig. 6)
. This important finding predicts that this CAR-independent approach will allow an improved tumor to normal gene transfer differential and thus a potentially improved therapeutic study.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To this end, we have explored the basis of SCCHN tumor refractoriness to adenoviral vectors. We have found that a relative paucity of the primary adenoviral receptor, CAR, is the major factor limiting gene transfer by this vector. Of note in this regard, primary SCCHN tumor cells exhibited an even more extreme resistance to adenoviral infection than their cell line counterparts. This phenomenon has been noted in other tumor contexts in which a deficiency of the adenoviral primary receptor limits vector efficacy (18) . It is thus clear that the issue of CAR deficiency may present a more general problem that will represent a confounding factor in all cancer gene therapy strategies based on in vivo gene delivery.
As a means to address this issue, we attempted to achieve gene delivery to these refractory tumor cells via CAR-independent pathways. We used an adenoviral vector capable of achieving primary cell attachment via binding to dysregulated cellular integrins characteristic of SCCHN tumor cells. This was achieved by genetic modifications of the virion to allow the incorporation of an integrin-binding peptide motif in the HI loop of the fiber knob. We demonstrated that this vector accomplished CAR-independent gene transfer to SCCHN cell lines and primary tumor explants. Importantly, such CAR-independent gene transfer allowed dramatic augmentations of the efficacy of transgene expression in these tumor cells. On this basis, methods that accomplish CAR-independent gene transfer may present a more general means to augment gene transfer efficiency in those contexts in which native CAR levels may be suboptimal for gene delivery processes. In addition, the achievement of gene transfer via a dysregulated receptor cellular receptor characteristic of the SCCHN neoplastic phenotype potentially provided a level of tumor cell specificity.
The disease context of SCCHN has allowed gene therapy approaches based on in situ delivery into the tumor (7, 8, 9, 10)
. Whereas this scenario allows a means to achieve a level of cell specificity via the locoregional delivery approach, suboptimal tumor transduction has represented a major limitation. Thus, our vector schema described here was designed to allow the enhancement of gene delivery by addressing the CAR deficiency aspect of SCCHN tumor biology. In addition, the exploitation of a tumor-specific marker allows an enhanced tumor:normal infection differential. The dramatic augmentation of gene transfer noted with Ad5lucRGD for SCCHN tumor cells was not noted for normal buccal mucosa. Of note in this regard, integrin dysregulation has been described in the context of SCCHN (43)
. Whereas this has mainly been noted for integrins of the
Vß3 class in SCCHN, it is noteworthy that at least 12 of the described integrin heterodimers, including
2ß1 and
3ß1, recognize the RGD sequence contained in the HI loop of the modified adenoviral vector (44, 45, 46, 47)
. Whereas we cannot rule out the possibility that other RGD-binding integrins are used by the integrin-targeted vectors used in this study, the expression patterns of
2ß1 and
3ß1 in SCCHN cell lines and tumors make them likely candidate targets in the present study. In this study, we also demonstrated the expression of
2ß1 and
3ß1 integrins on SCCHN tumor cell lines. The differential augmentations of Ad5lucRGD for tumor tissue and normal tissue in this case may thus be understood to potentially allow a more favorable therapeutic index than is currently achievable via unmodified adenoviral vectors.
Studies by OMalley et al. (8) have suggested that adenoviral vector doses required to achieve adequate tumor transduction may be associated with limiting toxicity in the context of SCCHN gene therapy. Indeed, vector dose appears to be a critical issue in relation to adenoviral vector-induced immunogenicity (35 , 36) . Clearly, maneuvers to reduce the vial dose may have a beneficial effect with respect to these parameters. Thus, our description of a viral vector with dramatically augmented efficiencies clearly has potential implications in a variety of genetic diseases for which adenoviral vector-based approaches have been proposed, such as cystic fibrosis and Duchenes muscular dystrophy (48) . In these contexts as well, CAR deficiency is a major factor limiting vector utility. It may thus be critical to the overall usage of adenoviral vectors to devise CAR-independent gene schemas relevant to specific tissue contexts. Maneuvers such as those we describe here may thus allow the use of viral doses commensurate with achieving meaningful therapeutic results in a variety of gene therapy approaches.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by grants from the American Lung Association and the American Heart Association and by NIH Grants ROI CA74242, R01 CA68245-01, RO1 HL-50255, and T32CA75930. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Gene Therapy Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, WTI620, Birmingham, AL 35294-3300. Phone: (205) 934-8627; Fax: (205) 975-7476; E-mail: david.curiel{at}ccc.uab.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: SCCHN, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; CAR, coxsackie-adenovirus receptor; FBS, fetal bovine serum; DMEM/F-12, DMEM/Hams F-12; mAb, monoclonal antibody; pfu, plaque-forming unit; m.o.i., multiplicity of infection; Ad, adenovirus; RLU, relative light unit. ![]()
Received 1/14/98; revised 5/10/99; accepted 5/18/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
vß3 and
vß5 promote adenovirus internalization but not virus attachment. Cell, 73: 309-319, 1993.[Medline]
vß5 selectively promotes adenovirus mediated cell membrane permeabilization. J. Cell Biol., 127: 257-264, 1994.
vß5 and
vß5 on human monocytes and T lymphocytes facilitates adenovirus-mediated gene delivery. J. Virol., 69: 2257-2263, 1995.[Abstract]
vß3 and
vß5 contribute to cell attachment to vitronectin but differentially distribute on the cell surface. J. Cell Biol., 113: 919-929, 1991.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Y. Logunov, O. V. Zubkova, A. S. Karyagina-Zhulina, E. A. Shuvalova, A. P. Karpov, M. M. Shmarov, I. L. Tutykhina, Y. S. Alyapkina, N. M. Grezina, N. A. Zinovieva, et al. Identification of HI-Like Loop in CELO Adenovirus Fiber for Incorporation of Receptor Binding Motifs J. Virol., September 15, 2007; 81(18): 9641 - 9652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Reddy, S. Ganesh, and D.-C. Yu Enhanced gene transfer and oncolysis of head and neck cancer and melanoma cells by fiber chimeric oncolytic adenoviruses. Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 12(9): 2869 - 2878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-L. Toh, S.-S. Hong, F. v. d. Loo, L. Franqueville, L. Lindholm, W. v. d. Berg, P. Boulanger, and P. Miossec Enhancement of Adenovirus-Mediated Gene Delivery to Rheumatoid Arthritis Synoviocytes and Synovium by Fiber Modifications: Role of Arginine-Glycine-Aspartic Acid (RGD)- and Non-RGD-Binding Integrins J. Immunol., December 1, 2005; 175(11): 7687 - 7698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Curiel Next Generation CRAds for Virotherapy of Cancer Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 1, 2005; 2005(1): 141 - 144. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Salone, Y. Martina, S. Piersanti, E. Cundari, G. Cherubini, L. Franqueville, C. M. Failla, P. Boulanger, and I. Saggio Integrin {alpha}3{beta}1 Is an Alternative Cellular Receptor for Adenovirus Serotype 5 J. Virol., December 15, 2003; 77(24): 13448 - 13454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Friedlander, C. L. Delaune, J. M. Abadie, M. Toups, J. LaCour, L. Marrero, Q. Zhong, and J. K. Kolls Efficacy of CD40 Ligand Gene Therapy in Malignant Mesothelioma Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., September 1, 2003; 29(3): 321 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pereboeva, S. Komarova, G. Mikheeva, V. Krasnykh, and D.T. Curiel Approaches to Utilize Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells as Cellular Vehicles Stem Cells, July 1, 2003; 21(4): 389 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Connell and R. R. Weichselbaum Gene Therapy: The Challenges of Translating Laboratory Research Into Clinical Practice J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2003; 21(12): 2230 - 2231. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kawakami, H. Li, J. T. Lam, V. Krasnykh, D. T. Curiel, and J. L. Blackwell Substitution of the Adenovirus Serotype 5 Knob with a Serotype 3 Knob Enhances Multiple Steps in Virus Replication Cancer Res., March 15, 2003; 63(6): 1262 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hemminki, A. Kanerva, B. Liu, M. Wang, R. D. Alvarez, G. P. Siegal, and D. T. Curiel Modulation of Coxsackie-Adenovirus Receptor Expression for Increased Adenoviral Transgene Expression Cancer Res., February 15, 2003; 63(4): 847 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. S. Haviv, J. L. Blackwell, A. Kanerva, P. Nagi, V. Krasnykh, I. Dmitriev, M. Wang, S. Naito, X. Lei, A. Hemminki, et al. Adenoviral Gene Therapy for Renal Cancer Requires Retargeting to Alternative Cellular Receptors Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 62(15): 4273 - 4281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hemminki, K. R. Zinn, B. Liu, T. R. Chaudhuri, R. A. Desmond, B. E. Rogers, M. N. Barnes, R. D. Alvarez, and D. T. Curiel In Vivo Molecular Chemotherapy and Noninvasive Imaging With an Infectivity-Enhanced Adenovirus J Natl Cancer Inst, May 15, 2002; 94(10): 741 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. A. Ring Cytolytic viruses as potential anti-cancer agents J. Gen. Virol., March 1, 2002; 83(3): 491 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Shayakhmetov, Z.-Y. Li, S. Ni, and A. Lieber Targeting of Adenovirus Vectors to Tumor Cells Does Not Enable Efficient Transduction of Breast Cancer Metastases Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 62(4): 1063 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Vorburger and K. K. Hunt Adenoviral Gene Therapy Oncologist, February 1, 2002; 7(1): 46 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hemminki, I. Dmitriev, B. Liu, R. A. Desmond, R. Alemany, and D. T. Curiel Targeting Oncolytic Adenoviral Agents to the Epidermal Growth Factor Pathway with a Secretory Fusion Molecule Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 61(17): 6377 - 6381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Li, S. L. Brown, D. G. Stupack, X. S. Puente, D. A. Cheresh, and G. R. Nemerow Integrin {alpha}v{beta}1 Is an Adenovirus Coreceptor J. Virol., June 1, 2001; 75(11): 5405 - 5409. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. Krasnykh, N. Belousova, N. Korokhov, G. Mikheeva, and D. T. Curiel Genetic Targeting of an Adenovirus Vector via Replacement of the Fiber Protein with the Phage T4 Fibritin J. Virol., May 1, 2001; 75(9): 4176 - 4183. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Grill, V. W. Van Beusechem, P. Van Der Valk, C. M. F. Dirven, A. Leonhart, D. S. Pherai, H. J. Haisma, H. M. Pinedo, D. T. Curiel, and W. R. Gerritsen Combined Targeting of Adenoviruses to Integrins and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors Increases Gene Transfer into Primary Glioma Cells and Spheroids Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2001; 7(3): 641 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Thomas and P.M. Speight Cell Adhesion Molecules and Oral Cancer Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 2001; 12(6): 479 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Suzuki, J. Fueyo, V. Krasnykh, P. N. Reynolds, D. T. Curiel, and R. Alemany A Conditionally Replicative Adenovirus with Enhanced Infectivity Shows Improved Oncolytic Potency Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2001; 7(1): 120 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. Krasnykh, I. Dmitriev, J.-G. Navarro, N. Belousova, E. Kashentseva, J. Xiang, J. T. Douglas, and D. T. Curiel Advanced Generation Adenoviral Vectors Possess Augmented Gene Transfer Efficiency Based upon Coxsackie Adenovirus Receptor-independent Cellular Entry Capacity Cancer Res., December 1, 2000; 60(24): 6784 - 6787. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Kelly, C. R. Miller, D. J. Buchsbaum, J. Gomez-Navarro, M. N. Barnes, R. D. Alvarez, and D. T. Curiel Selectivity of TAG-72-targeted Adenovirus Gene Transfer to Primary Ovarian Carcinoma Cells versus Autologous Mesothelial Cells in Vitro Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2000; 6(11): 4323 - 4333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |