| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, S. A. R., China
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition, overexpression of p73 was found in several cancers such as lung, bladder, prostate, and colorectal (6, 7, 8, 9) . But no mutations were revealed in most of the cancer cells (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) . The expression of p73 was increased in lung cancer independent of p53 gene mutation (13) . Transcriptional silencing of p73 in leukemia was associated with 5' CpG island methylation (14 , 15) . However, there was no evidence of methylation in any of the solid tumors analyzed, including breast, renal, and colon cancers (14) .
In ovarian cancer, several genetic alterations have been identified, including mutations of p53 tumor suppressor, Ras, BRAC1, BRAC2, C-erb2, and Bcl-2 oncogenes. LOI of IGF2 and H19 genes was also involved in the genesis of ovarian cancer (16 , 17) . To date, the molecular mechanisms of ovarian cancer development are not well established. The new candidate tumor suppressor, p73, which is implicated in the pathogenesis of many types of cancer, may also be involved in the development of ovarian cancer. To elucidate the role of p73 in the development of ovarian cancer and the allelic-specific expression as a potential imprinted tumor suppressor, we investigated the specific allelic expression of the p73 gene in 56 cases of ovarian cancer, borderline ovarian tumor, and matched normal tissues. We also compared the expression level of p73 by semi-quantitative RT-PCR2 with p53. To further understand the expression of p73, we studied the p73 expression at the mRNA level and at the protein level as well as elucidating the methylation status of p73 gene in ovarian cancer tissues and cell lines.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA, RNA, and Protein Extraction and Purification.
Genomic DNA and RNA were isolated from frozen tissues and lymphocytes.
The tissues were pulverized in liquid nitrogen and the powder was
transferred to tubes with 75 mM NaCl and 25 mM
EDTA. DNA was extracted by proteinase K-phenol/chloroform
methods. RNA and protein were isolated using Tripure Isolation Reagent
(Boehringer Mannheim) according to the manufacturers protocol.
Alleleic Expression of p73.
To identify heterozygous samples, primers for exon 2 of the
p73 gene were used. PCR was performed using 100 ng of tumor
and normal matched DNA under the following conditions: (a)
95°C for 5 min; (b) 35 cycles of 95°C for 20 s;
(c) 62°C for 15 s; (d) 72°C for 30 s; and (d) a final extension for 4 min at 72°C. A specific
229-bp fragment was obtained. Five µl of PCR product was digested
with 10 units of StyI restriction enzyme at 37°C
overnight. Ten µl of product was electrophoresed on 3% NuSieve (3:1)
agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The size of the
undigested DNA band 229 bp and the StyI digested band 157 bp
were named as a and b allele, respectively. A
known sample of b allele was used as a control to ensure
complete digestion for each experiment. The primers used were as
follows: primer 1, 5'-CAGGAGGACAGAGCACGAG-3'; and primer 2,
5'-CGAAGGTGGCTGAGGCTAG-3'. Heterozygous samples
were chosen for RT-PCR using cDNA primers flanking the GC/AT
polymorphism and StyI RFLP. Two µg of total RNA was
reverse-transcribed by Superscript II (Life Technologies, Inc.).
One-twentieth of the cDNA volume was used for PCR amplification. The
PCR reaction was performed using primer 3 and primer 5. A specific band
of 285 bp was obtained. One-fiftieth of the first PCR product was used
for the nested PCR with primer 3 and primer 4. The primers used were as
follows: primer 3, 5'-GGGCTGCGACGGCTGCAGAGC-3; and primer 4,
5'-GAGAGCTCCAGAG GTGCTC-3'; and primer 5, 5'-ACCAGATGAGCAGCCGCG-3'. The
final size of the band is 116 bp. Each of the amplifications was 25
cycles using the previous PCR conditions. Contamination by genomic DNA
in total RNA was determined by the presence of DNA bands of different
sizes and by the experiments without reverse transcriptase. No
band was seen when reverse transcriptase was omitted. After RT-PCR, the
StyI digestion was performed as described previously, and a
size of 84 bp was seen for complete digestion that represented A/T
polymorphism.
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR.
Because advanced ovarian cancer tends to spread bilaterally and
both ovaries are affected, its difficult to collect both tumor and
normal ovarian tissue samples from the same patient. As a result, only
three matched normal ovarian and tumor samples were obtained. The other
normal tissues were either normal endometrium or normal cervix from the
same patient. We first compared the expression level of p73
in two patients with normal endometrium, cervix, ovary, or
lymphocytes. The expression level of p73 was nearly
the same in the adjacent normal tissues in the two patients and a
little bit lower in the lymphocytes. So, we investigated the
expression level of p73 in 14 advanced ovarian cancer
specimens (stages III and IV), in 9 samples of early stages (stages I
and II), and in 6 borderline ovarian tumors. All of them were compared
with the expression level in normal tissues. PCR was performed
according to conditions stated previously, except that 28 cycles were
used for p73 with primers 6 and 7 and 24 cycles for
ß-actin using primers 8 and 9. The conditions
for p53 were the same, except that the annealing
temperature was 54°C and 28 cycles with primers 10 and 11. The
primers used were as follows: primer 6, 5'-AACGCTGCCCCAACCACGAG-3' and
primer 7, 5'-GCCGGTTCATGCCCCCTACA-3' (for p73); primer 8,
5'-ATCTGGCACCACACCTTC TACAATGAGCTGCG-3' and primer 9,
5'-CGTCATACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCCACA TCTGC-3' (for
ß-actin); and primer 10,
5'-CTGAGGTTGGCTCTGACTGTACCACCATCC-3' and primer 11,
5'-CTCATTCAGCTCTCGGAACATCTCGAAGCG-3' (for p53). The
cycles were determined by the standard curve amplified from 16, 20, 24,
28, 32, 36, and 40. Conditions were chosen to give a linear
relationship between the amount of amplified product and the input RNA
(data not shown). A 231-bp band was seen for p73, 373 bp for
p53, and 400 bp for ß-actin. Ten
µl of PCR product was electrophoresed on a 2.5% agarose gel
and stained with ethidium bromide. The software UVP Gel Works 1.0 for
Windows was used to analyze the expression levels of p73 and
p53 in both tumor and normal specimens with
ß-actin as a control. Each PCR and
electrophoresis procedure was repeated twice. We first calculated the
average of p73 and ß-actin
expression for each sample, then we calculated the ratio of
p73 and ß-actin in both tumor and
normal tissues, and finally we compared the p73 expression
ratio between tumor and normal tissues (T/Tß/N/Nß). Students
t test was used for statistical analysis. A P
<0.05 was considered a significant difference. The same procedure was
performed for p53 expression.
Western Blot and Methylation Analysis of the p73
Gene in Ovarian Cancer.
Ovarian cancer cell lines were cultured in DMEM medium
supplemented with 10% FCS. Western blot was performed in ovarian
cancer cell lines using 50 µg of protein and a goat antihuman
polyclonal anti-p73 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) with a
dilution of 1:500 and visualized with the ECL chemiluminescent
detection kit (Amersham). The filters were also reprobed with
ß-actin (Sigma). Seven advanced ovarian cancer
samples, five early-stage, and three borderline ovarian tumor specimens
and matched normal tissues were also studied by Western blot using 20
µg of protein. The methylation state of p73 in ovarian
cancer cell lines and tissues was detected as described previously
(14)
. Two-tenths µg of genomic DNA was digested with 20
units of either methylcytosine-sensitive enzyme HpaII
(Promega) or its methylation-resistant isoschizomer, MspI
(Promega), for 3 h at 37°C, then phenol/chloroform-extracted,
ethanol-precipitated, dried, and resuspended to 10 µl of
Tris-EDTA buffer. One µl (20 ng) was amplified by PCR using
primers 5'-GGGGACGCAGCGAAACCG-3' and 5'-CTGCAGCCGTCGCAGCC-3', which
amplified the CpG island in exon 1 with a 77-bp band. Normal placenta
DNA was used as a negative control. The band existed after
HpaII digestion, but not if there were methylation
alleles.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss of p73 Protein Expression Was Related to CpG Island
Methylation in Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines.
Among the five ovarian cancer cell lines studied, p73 protein was
detected in two, OV2008 and A2780cp. We hypothesized that the absence
of p73 protein might be caused by methylation of the CpG islands. The
results showed that the protein-negative cell lines OVCA3, A2780s, and
SKOV3 were methylated in exon 1. In OV2008 and A2780cp with
p73 expression, exon 1 was not methylated (Fig. 3)
. SKOV3, exhibiting no p73
expression in mRNA and protein level, was treated with 10
µM of 5-aza for 8 days. RT-PCR and Western blot
showed reexpression of this gene at both the mRNA and protein levels,
as shown in Fig. 4
. No evidence of
methylation was found in ovarian cancer tissues and normal tissues,
except that one cancer sample (T21) with monoallelic expression was
methylated.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Monoallelic expression of p73 has been reported previously, suggesting that p73 may be a candidate of the imprinting gene (2 , 5) . In contrast to previous findings, we observed 91.7% (22 of 24) of the ovarian cancer and 70.8% (17 of 24) of the normal endometrium and normal cervix expressed biallelically. Even lymphocytes were biallelic expressed in eight of the twelve samples. Our results are in line with several other studies that biallelic expression of this gene was found in 25 of 26 normal lung specimens (18) , in both bladder cancer and normal bladder (7) , in 3 peripheral lymphocyte cell lines, 1 colon cancer cell line, and melanoma cell lines (12) . These results supported the conclusion that biallelic expression was involved in most of the ovarian cancer and normal tissues. On the other hand, in our study 2 of 24 informative samples maintained monoallelic expression in both tumor and normal specimens. Imbalanced allelic expression was identified in 3 of 24 (12.5%) samples with biallelic expression in tumor and monoallelic expression in normal tissues. This phenomenon looks like LOI. The same phenomenon was found in (5 of 5) lung cancer (6) , (1 of 26) lung cancer (19) and (7 of 11) renal carcinoma (5) . Genomic imprinting has been suggested to play a role in many human cancers (20 , 21) . Activation of the silent allele with biallelic expression in cancer cells and monoallelic in normal tissues was considered as LOI. LOI has been reported in many types of tumors (21 , 22) . As shown by others (7 , 12 , 18) , our results showed that p73 was evidently biallelically expressed in both normal tissues and ovarian cancer. Therefore, the p73 gene was not imprinted in ovarian cancer and LOI of this gene was not an important step in the tumorigenesis when compared with renal cell carcinoma and lung cancer (5 , 6) . It seems that allelic expression of p73 may be tissue specific or individual specific.
In this study, we showed that expression level of p73 is higher in advanced ovarian cancer than in normal tissues. However, our present study failed to show any correlation in the mRNA level between p73 and p53. Overexpression of p73 gene has also been reported in lung cancer, bladder cancer, and colorectal cancer without mutation (6 , 7 , 9) . It is possible that wild type p73, not mutant p73, is overexpresssed in tumors. The wild type p73 functions as a security guard when overexpressed and works to arrest the cell cycle as a tumor suppressor gene. However, another possibility is that p73 functions as an oncogene in the up-regulation of cell growth (19) and silences p53 function by binding to its functional binding site (23) .
To elucidate the imprinting and expression of p73 gene, we studied the methylation of promoter CpG island in ovarian cancer tissues and normal tissues. Finding no evidence of methylation in these samples further suggests that it is not an imprinting gene. However, in ovarian cancer cell lines the lack of p73 protein expression with evidence of methylation supports that methylation of p73 may play a role. Reactivating the expression by 5-aza also confirms the role of methylation in the control of expression of this gene. Our results in the ovarian cell lines support that epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes via methylation of the promoter CpG island is involved in the ovarian malignancy. Although it is difficult to explain the high level of both mRNA and protein in advanced ovarian cancer and the absence of protein expression in ovarian cancer cell lines, this is the first report that loss of p73 expression is attributable to methylation in ovarian cancer.
Our study revealed that LOH of the p73 gene occurred in a low frequency in ovarian cancer. Biallelic expression of p73 was found in the majority of ovarian cancer and normal tissues. Overexpression of p73 was associated with advanced ovarian cancer when compared with the early-stage and borderline ovarian tumors, and we showed that p73 overexpression was independent of p53. Lack of expression of p73 was associated with CpG island methylation. Demethylation using 5-aza in SKOV3 can reactivate the expression of this gene in both the mRNA and protein levels. We conclude that the p73 gene is not an imprinting gene in ovarian cancer. Overexpression of p73 in both the transcriptional and translational levels is associated with ovarian cancer in advanced stages. DNA methylation is involved in the p73 inactivation in ovarian cancer cell lines.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University
of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Phone: 852-28554684; Fax: 852-28550947;
E-mail: hysngan{at}hkucc.hku.hk ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: RT-PCR, reverse
transcription-PCR; LOI, loss of imprinting; LOH, loss of
heterozygosity; 5-aza, 5-azacytidine. ![]()
Received 4/ 3/00; revised 7/17/00; accepted 7/17/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Teodoridis, J. Hall, S. Marsh, H. D. Kannall, C. Smyth, J. Curto, N. Siddiqui, H. Gabra, H. L. McLeod, G. Strathdee, et al. CpG Island Methylation of DNA Damage Response Genes in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 65(19): 8961 - 8967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. M. Moll and N. Slade p63 and p73: Roles in Development and Tumor Formation Mol. Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 2(7): 371 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Liu, R. C.-Y. Leung, K. Y.-K. Chan, P.-M. Chiu, A. N.-Y. Cheung, K.-F. Tam, T.-Y. Ng, L.-C. Wong, and H. Y.-S. Ngan p73 Expression Is Associated with the Cellular Radiosensitivity in Cervical Cancer after Radiotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2004; 10(10): 3309 - 3316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Oniscu, N Sphyris, R G Morris, S Bader, and D J Harrison p73{alpha} is a candidate effector in the p53 independent apoptosis pathway of cisplatin damaged primary murine colonocytes J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2004; 57(5): 492 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Concin, K. Becker, N. Slade, S. Erster, E. Mueller-Holzner, H. Ulmer, G. Daxenbichler, A. Zeimet, R. Zeillinger, C. Marth, et al. Transdominant {Delta}TAp73 Isoforms Are Frequently Up-regulated in Ovarian Cancer. Evidence for Their Role as Epigenetic p53 Inhibitors in Vivo Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 64(7): 2449 - 2460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sasaki, H. Mita, M. Toyota, S. Ishida, I. Morimoto, T. Yamashita, T. Tanaka, K. Imai, Y. Nakamura, and T. Tokino Identification of the Interleukin 4 Receptor {alpha} Gene as a Direct Target for p73 Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8145 - 8152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Guan, H.-X. Peng, B. Yu, and Y. Lu p73 Overexpression and Angiogenesis in Human Colorectal Carcinoma Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2003; 33(5): 215 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Stiewe, J. Stanelle, C. C. Theseling, B. Pollmeier, M. Beitzinger, and B. M. Putzer Inactivation of Retinoblastoma (RB) Tumor Suppressor by Oncogenic Isoforms of the p53 Family Member p73 J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2003; 278(16): 14230 - 14236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Stiewe, S. Zimmermann, A. Frilling, H. Esche, and B. M. Putzer Transactivation-deficient {Delta}TA-p73 Acts as an Oncogene Cancer Res., July 1, 2002; 62(13): 3598 - 3602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-i. Watanabe, T. Ozaki, T. Nakagawa, K. Miyazaki, M. Takahashi, M. Hosoda, S. Hayashi, S. Todo, and A. Nakagawara Physical Interaction of p73 with c-Myc and MM1, a c-Myc-binding Protein, and Modulation of the p73 Function J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 15113 - 15123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakagawa, M. Takahashi, T. Ozaki, K.-i. Watanabe, S. Todo, H. Mizuguchi, T. Hayakawa, and A. Nakagawara Autoinhibitory Regulation of p73 by {Delta}Np73 To Modulate Cell Survival and Death through a p73-Specific Target Element within the {Delta}Np73 Promoter Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2002; 22(8): 2575 - 2585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |