Clinical Cancer Research Research Funding
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cowen, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pollack, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cowen, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pollack, A.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 6, 4402-4408, November 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Regular Articles

Prostate Cancer Radiosensitization in Vivo with Adenovirus-mediated p53 Gene Therapy1

Didier Cowen2, Naji Salem2, Faramarz Ashoori, Ray Meyn, Marvin L. Meistrich, Jack A. Roth and Alan Pollack3

Departments of Experimental Radiation Oncology [D. C., N. S., F. A., R. M., M. L. M.], Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery [J. A. R.], and Radiation Oncology [A. P.], University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030

ABSTRACT

An adenovirus 5 vector containing wild-type p53 cDNA (Ad5-p53) and a cytomegalovirus promoter was used to generate p53 transgene expression. Control vector (Ad5-pA) contained the poly-adenosine sequence. PC3 cells (2 x 106) were injected s.c. into the legs of nude mice. Treatment with Ad5-p53 was initiated at a tumor volume of 200 mm3. Three intratumoral injections (days 1, 4, and 7) were given with 3 x 108 plaque-forming units, followed by 5 Gy pelvic irradiation (day 8) in one fraction using a cobalt-60 source. Tumor volume measurements were obtained every 2 days. LNCaP cells (2 x 106) were injected orthotopically into the prostates of nude mice, and tumor weight was approximated using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) obtained from weekly tail vein bleedings. The target PSA for the start of the studies was 5 ng/ml. The intraprostatic injections of Ad5-p53 were done twice (days 1 and 2) and followed by 5 Gy pelvic irradiation on day 3.

The PC3 tumor volume growth curves were log transformed and fitted using linear regression. The times (in days) for the tumors to reach 500 mm3 were calculated as 10.7 ± 0.7 (± SE) for the saline control (no virus), 9.8 ± 2.1 for Ad5-pA, 15.6 ± 1.6 for Ad5-p53, 14.6 ± 1.5 radiation therapy (RT; 5 Gy), 14.6 ± 1.5 for Ad5-pA plus RT, and 31.4 ± 5.3 for Ad5-p53 plus RT. The Ad5-p53 plus RT times were significantly different from the other groups. An enhancement factor of 3.4 was calculated, indicating supra-additivity.

LNCaP tumor growth was determined via weekly serum PSA measurements. Treatment failure was determined using two PSA-based methods; a serum PSA of >1.5 ng/ml or two rises in PSA during 6 weeks posttreatment. The results were similar using either end point. Treatment with Ad5-p53 plus 5 Gy resulted in significantly fewer PSA failures (<30%), as compared with Ad5-p53 alone (64–73%) and the other controls (~80–100%) These results are also consistent with a supra-additive inhibition of tumor growth. Tumor growth in vivo was inhibited supra-additively when p53null and p53wildtype prostate tumors were treated with Ad5-p53 and 5 Gy radiation.

INTRODUCTION

Patients at high risk of PSA4 relapse after external beam radiotherapy may be identified using the pretreatment clinical parameters of PSA, Gleason score, and stage (1 , 2) . The question then, is how best to treat this group. External beam radiotherapy to conventional doses is inadequate, and the main mechanism appears to be failure to completely eradicate the disease locally. Local persistence is evident in most patients that exhibit a rising PSA in this setting, because prostate biopsies are positive in the majority of those that are investigated. Although dose escalation results from a number of institutions indicate modest reductions in biochemical failure rates for high-risk patients (3, 4, 5) , dose-related improvements in outcome have been modest and are still wanting. One approach that holds promise is radiosensitization.

Recent clinical (6, 7, 8) and animal (9, 10, 11) studies have described improved results when androgen ablation is combined with radiation. The results suggest a supra-additive interaction between these treatments. The clinical gains from the combination have been encouraging to a limited degree but have been associated with significant long-term side effects. Clearly, a radiosensitization strategy that has fewer systemic side effects is desirable. The potential for radiosensitization using gene therapy is relatively untapped. Our approach has been to alter the intracellular molecular milieu such that cell death via apoptosis is favored over cell cycle delay and repair in response to radiation. This concept was manifest from in vitro experiments (12) involving two prostate cancer cell lines using a replication defective adenovirus 5 vector containing a p53wildtype cDNA construct (Ad5-p53). A key question was whether Ad5-p53 would sensitize prostate cancer cells that did not express p53 (PC3 line), as well as those that expressed p53wildtype (LNCaP line). The results showed that clonogenic survival was reduced and apoptosis enhanced supra-additively in both cell lines when Ad5-p53 was combined with radiation. Thus, p53 gene replacement was not the only mechanism responsible for the radiosensitization observed.

In the present study, the effect of Ad5-p53 on the in vivo tumor growth response of PC3 and LNCaP cells to radiation was investigated. Whereas the in vitro data demonstrate radiosensitization by this vector under ideal conditions, these experiments are necessary to verify that p53 gene delivery plus radiation is effective in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Lines.
The PC3 and LNCaP cell lines were obtained from the American Tissue Type Collection and were maintained in cell culture, using liquid nitrogen for long-term storage. Cells were cultured for a period of ~2 months, before taking a new aliquot from liquid nitrogen storage. Both PC3 and LNCaP cells were cultured in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 100 IU/ml Pen-Strep solution.

In Vivo Ad5-p53 Vector Treatment.
An adenovirus 5 vector containing wild-type p53 cDNA (Ad5-p53) and a cytomegalovirus promoter was used to generate p53 transgene expression (13) . The main control vector used contained the poly-adenosine sequence (Ad5-pA); however, an adenoviral-Luc vector (Ad5-Luc) containing the cDNA for luciferase was also used as a control in some studies. We have used these control vectors interchangeably and have not seen a difference in clonogenicity or apoptosis (12) . PC3 cells (2 x 106) were injected s.c. into the legs of nude mice. Treatment with Ad5-p53 was initiated at a tumor volume of 200 mm3 . Three intratumoral injections (days 1, 4, and 7) were given with 3 x 108 plaque-forming units, followed by 5 Gy irradiation in one fraction using a cobalt-60 source. Tumor volume measurements were obtained every 2 days.

LNCaP cells (2 x 106 in 24 µl) were injected orthotopically into the prostates of nude mice. Tumor weight was approximated using serum PSA obtained from weekly tail vein bleedings. There is a linear relationship between tumor (plus prostate) weight and serum PSA; linear regression results revealed that tumor weights of 0.15, 0.3, and 0.6 g correlated with PSAs of 1.1, 11.1, and 31.1 ng/ml. The target PSA for the studies was 5 ng/ml, which correlated with a tumor weight of 0.208 g, which was found at a median of 6 weeks after orthotopic injection. The animals were then anesthetized via s.c. injection of 100 µl of a 0.02 mg/µl solution of Ketamine in 0.9% saline, the prostate was surgically exposed, and 4.5 x 108 pfu injected in 24 µl. The intraprostatic injections were done twice (days 1 and 2), and 5 Gy pelvic irradiation using a cobalt-60 source was administered 24 h later (day 3).

Calculation of Enhancement Factor.
As a determination of supra-additivity in PC3 tumor volume growth delay from the combination of Ad5-p53 + 5 Gy, an enhancement factor was calculated (9) . The tumor volume curves for each tumor-bearing animal were first log-transformed, and the absolute delay in tumor growth to 500 mm3 relative to the saline control was calculated. These values were used to calculate the enhancement factor [Abs delay (Ad5-p53 + RT - Ad5-p53)/Abs delay (PBS + RT alone)], which measures the relative increase of the combined treatment (taking into consideration the effects of the Ad5-p53 vector) over radiation alone. The Ad5-pA controls were not included because significant delays over the saline controls were not observed. An enhancement factor of >1.0 is indicative of supra-additivity between Ad5-p53 and radiation.

Measurement of Serum PSA.
Human PSA was measured in the serum obtained from tail vein bleedings. From each blood draw, 30 µl of serum were diluted 1:5 in PSA diluent (Abbott Labs, Abbott Park, IL) and analyzed for PSA concentration on an IMX analyzer (Abbott Labs). The results are expressed in ng/ml.

Apoptosis and p53 Staining.
A terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling assay was used to quantify apoptosis in tissue sections from PC3 and LNCaP tumors injected in vivo with Ad5-p53 as described above. The tumors were removed and fixed in 10% neutral formalin overnight and embedded in paraffin. Sections were then mounted on silane-coated slides as described previously (9 , 11) . The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling staining of apoptotic cells was accomplished using the ApopTag (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) kit. The cells were counterstained with hematoxylin. Positive controls were included with each group of samples stained.

The immunohistochemical staining of p53 was performed as outlined previously (14) . Briefly, paraffin-embedded tissue sections mounted on slides were deparaffinized, hydrated, and treated for 30 min with 0.3% H2O2. Antigen retrieval was accomplished with three high power microwave treatments of 5 min each. Nonspecific staining was blocked by incubating 15 min with 2% NHS in PBS (NHS-PBS). Primary Ab6 anti-p53 antibody (Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp., San Diego, CA) was used at a 1:100 dilution in NHS-PBS, incubating on the slide overnight at room temperature. After rinsing the slide four times in PBS, biotinylated second antibody (1:200 in NHS-PBS) was added for 30 min. The biotinylated second antibody and other reagents for peroxidase staining were supplied in a kit from Vecta Laboratories (Vectastain ABC kit; Vecta Labs, Burlington, CA). After rinsing off the second antibody, the Vectastain Elite ABC reagent was added for 30 min, the slides were washed, peroxidase substrate solution was added for 20 min, and the cells were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin.

RESULTS

The experiments with the PC3 line were designed to determine the ability of intratumoral Ad5-p53 plus radiation to enhance tumor volume growth delay over Ad5-p53 alone. The hypothesis was that the administration of Ad5-p53 would replace p53 function in PC3 cells, which are p53null. The replacement of p53 function would maximize the chance for apoptosis in response to radiation. Injection of Ad5-p53 into PC3 tumors resulted in increased p53 expression and apoptosis in portions of the tumor 24 h later (Fig. 1)Citation , as compared with Ad5-Luc control vector. The data indicate that Ad5-p53 treatment resulted in functional p53 expression in vivo.



View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Replacement of p53 and induction of apoptosis in PC3 tumors treated with Ad5-p53 in vivo. A single intratumoral injection of Ad5-p53 at 4.5 x 108 pfu in 24 µl resulted in the expression p53 (bottom left) and apoptosis (bottom right). Injection of Ad5-Luc at 4.5 x 108 pfu did not cause detectable p53 expression (top left) or enhanced apoptosis (top right).

 
Fig. 2Citation shows the tumor volume growth delay response of PC3 cells grown in the legs of nude mice to three Ad5-p53 intratumoral injections, with or without single-fraction 5 Gy of {gamma}-irradiation. There were a number of controls, including injection of PBS alone, PBS + 5 Gy, Ad5-pA control vector alone, and Ad5-pA + 5 Gy. The Ad5-p53 vector was administered alone and in combination with 5 Gy. The results illustrate a substantial tumor volume growth delay for Ad5-p53 plus radiation, as compared with the other treatment groups, including Ad5-p53 alone. Table 1Citation summarizes the absolute time to reach 500 mm3 , which was calculated from the log-transformed tumor volume growth curves from each animal. The absolute delay was about three times that seen for the PBS alone and Ad5-pA alone controls and was about two times that for the PBS + 5 Gy, Ad5-pA + 5 Gy, and Ad5-p53 alone groups. One-way ANOVA (Scheffe test) showed that absolute tumor growth delay from Ad5-p53 + 5 Gy was significantly greater than from all of the other treatments. The enhancement factor was calculated to be 3.4, indicating a supra-additive affect on tumor growth.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of Ad5-p53 + 5 Gy radiation on PC3 tumor volume growth. The groups shown include PBS control (•), PBS + 5 Gy RT ({square}), Ad5-pA vector alone ({diamond}), Ad5-pA + 5 Gy RT ({blacksquare}), Ad5-p53 alone ({blacktriangleup}), Ad5-p53+5 Gy RT ({circ}). The number of animals per group is shown in Table 1Citation . This is a representative experiment of two.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 %Delay in PC3 tumor growth to a volume of 500 mm3 induced by Ad5-p53 and/or 5 Gy Radiation

 
LNCaP cells are p53wildtype, leaving to question the mechanism for potentiation of the tumor growth inhibitory action of radiation by Ad5-p53 on such cells. In vitro data (9) suggested that p53 overexpression as a consequence of treatment with Ad5-p53 enhanced the apoptotic response and reduced cell survival of LNCaP cells exposed to radiation. The in vivo experiments performed here were designed to test whether LNCaP tumors grown in the prostates of nude mice, and therefore under the influence of stromal-epithelial interactions, would be inhibited supra-additively to Ad5-p53 plus radiation. Because LNCaP cells produce PSA, the orthotopic system closely parallels human prostate cancer. Serum PSA obtained through tail vein bleeding is a surrogate for tumor weight and/or volume. This is illustrated in Fig. 3Citation , where a highly significant relationship was found between serum PSA and tumor (plus prostate) weight. Thus, serum PSA after treatment was used to determine the failure rates for the various treatments tested.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Relationship of LNCaP tumor plus prostate weight to serum PSA in untreated LNCaP-bearing nude mice. LNCaP cells were injected into the prostates of nude mice, and at various times thereafter serum PSA and tumor plus prostate weights were assayed.

 
The two methods used to assess biochemical failure are similar to those used in patients with prostate cancer. In one, a 6-week posttreatment serum PSA value of >1.5 ng/ml (threshold PSA method) was considered evidence of failure, and in the other a rising PSA on two consecutive weekly bleedings or a single rise of >1.5 ng/ml (rising PSA method) over the 6-week posttreatment period was considered evidence of failure. The pretreatment and 6-week posttreatment PSA results are summarized in Table 2Citation . The average pretreatment PSA was 4.86 ng/ml. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in terms of pretreatment PSA. Table 2Citation also displays the 6-week posttreatment PSAs. Although Ad5-p53 + 5 Gy resulted in the lowest mean posttreatment PSA, the only statistically significant difference between this group and the others was with the PBS-only group. Mean posttreatment PSAs are not an accurate reflection of response because once biochemical failure is established, PSA rises quickly. Table 2Citation illustrates this variability in posttreatment PSAs, showing that the Ad5-p53 + RT group had the lowest median posttreatment PSA (0.5 ng/ml), and yet in one animal that failed, the PSA rose to over 56 ng/ml. The more meaningful end points of the threshold and rising PSA methods are reflective of clinical biochemical end points that have been widely adopted clinically.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 %Pretreatment and posttreatment PSAs in nude mice bearing orthotopic LNCaP tumors

 
Table 3Citation shows that both methods resulted in similar estimates of treatment failure. Treatment with Ad5-p53 + 5 Gy resulted in significantly fewer PSA failures (<30%), as compared with Ad5-p53 alone (64–73%) and the other controls (~80–100%). This trend was highly statistically significant. The determining component was the distinctive reduction in biochemical failure from Ad5-p53 plus radiation over Ad5-p53 alone and the other controls. In univariate analysis ({chi}2 ), the Ad5-p53 plus radiation failure rates by both the threshold and rising PSA methods were significantly lower than all of the other groups, including the Ad5-p53 alone group. There was a clear-cut advantage to the Ad5-p53 plus radiation combination. The reduction in biochemical failure from this combination appeared to be greater than the additive effects of the individual treatments.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 %Treatment failure using biochemical criteria in nude mice bearing orthotopic LNCaP tumors

 
DISCUSSION

The eradication of locally advanced or high-risk prostate cancer with radiation has proven more difficult than believed previously. The clinical application of PSA as an end point has been the principal factor leading to this realization. Although modern series document improved outcome with higher radiation doses, the gains have been modest and not without side effects (5 , 15 , 16) . The need for novel methods of radiosensitization is apparent. Androgen ablation has shown promise as a radiation sensitizer of androgen-sensitive cancer cells (9, 10, 11) ; however, the morbidity from prolonged androgen ablation in men with prostate cancer is significant. Novel approaches to radiosensitization with reduced systemic effects are more desirable, and gene therapy offers promise in this regard.

The p53 gene product has been shown to be a key factor in the radiation response pathways governing cell cycle arrest and repair and apoptosis (17, 18, 19) . A number of studies have indicated that p53 replacement in tumor cell lines with altered p53 expression reduces tumorigenicity and promotes apoptosis (20, 21, 22, 23, 24) and sensitizes tumor cells to radiation (25, 26, 27, 28) . These effects are less conclusive in cases of p53 transgene overexpression in p53wildtype tumors. For p53wildtype tumors treated with p53 gene therapy, the inhibition of tumorigenesis and promotion of apoptosis have ranged from significant (12) to nearly absent (29 , 30) . Likewise, the action of p53 gene transfer plus radiation on tumor cell lines with p53wildtype expression has been variable; some reports have described radiosensitization of p53wildtype tumors (29 , 31) , and others have not (30) . In our in vitro experience (12) , apoptosis was induced in the absence of radiation by p53 transgene expression in the p53wildtype LNCaP line to about the same degree as for the p53null PC3 line; adenoviral-mediated p53 radiosensitization using a clonogenic survival assay was also observed in these lines.

The prostate is amenable to direct intraprostatic injection of gene therapy vectors (32) . A foremost concern with such a strategy is whether sufficient radiosensitization can be accomplished with relatively few supplemental gene therapy treatments during radiotherapy. The efficacy of intraprostatic gene therapy should be established with two to three intraprostatic injections during a radiation course because of cost, convenience, and potential morbidity issues with more than three injections. The current investigation establishes that two to three intratumoral injections results in substantial sensitization in both p53null and p53wildtype prostate cancer lines. The enhancement in PC3 tumor growth inhibition by three daily intratumoral injections of Ad5-p53, followed a day later by a single 5 Gy radiation, was calculated to be >3-fold, relative to the controls. A similar effect was observed for p53wildtype LNCaP cells using serum PSA as a measure of failure to control tumor growth. The rising PSA profile is the earliest and most sensitive end point in the documentation of treatment failure in patients with prostate cancer and is highly correlated with eventual clinical disease relapse. The orthotopic LNCaP model used here is decidedly representative of human prostate cancer, from the dependence on stromal growth factors for tumorigenicity (33) , to the secretion of PSA in proportion to tumor weight (Fig. 3)Citation , as well as the sensitivity to radiation. With two intratumoral injections of Ad5-p53 plus single-fraction radiation, PSA response was sustained for >6 weeks in close to 80% by the rising PSA method. Freedom from a rising PSA was seen in 36% of Ad5-p53 alone control group and 20–30% of the control irradiated groups (Table 3)Citation . Thus, the freedom from failure rate in the Ad5-p53 + 5 Gy group was greater than the additive effect of the controls.

In conclusion, our results confirm the feasibility of sensitizing prostate cancer cells to radiation in vivo using adenoviral-mediated p53 gene therapy. By our estimation, based on prior in vitro (12) and in vivo data, the radiosensitization achieved in prostate cancer patients treated with Ad5-p53 and fractionated radiotherapy should be substantial. The data described here represent the minimum expected gain from combining Ad5-p53 and radiation, because all of the intratumoral injections were given before radiotherapy and only a single radiation fraction was used. The strategy currently being instituted in patients involves three injections of Ad5-p53 into the prostate at 2-week intervals during fractionated or low-dose-rate radiotherapy. Because transgene p53 expression lasts at least 5–7 days depending on cell type (34 , 35) , sensitization could occur for 35–45% of the daily radiation treatments, which typically ranges from 34 to 42 fractions over 6.8–8.5 weeks. Using intensity modulated radiotherapy and hypofractionation (36) , it may be possible to shorten overall treatment time without increasing side effects; this would facilitate sensitization by Ad5-p53 for >50% of the radiation fractions administered. Treatment of LNCaP cells in vitro (9) resulted in about a 2.5-fold reduction (0.187–0.072) in the surviving fraction at 2 Gy. If radiosensitization of this magnitude were sustained for even just 35–45% of the radiation fractions, tumor control probability would be expected to increase substantially (37) . Radiotherapy dose-escalation studies (3, 4, 5 , 38) have established that most radiation failures are attributable to local persistence of disease and that more aggressive local therapy is justified. Gene therapy is an ideal approach in this setting.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Mamta Sangha and Paul Hachem for technical assistance. We are grateful to Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. for supplying the adenovirus-p53 vector (RPR/INGN 201).

FOOTNOTES

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This study was supported in part by Department of Defense Grant DAMD 17-98-1-8483; NIH Grants CA 06294 and CA 16672 awarded by the National Cancer Institute, United States Department of Health and Human Services; and the Prostate Cancer Research Program at M. D. Anderson. D. C. and N. S. were supported in part by a Prostate Cancer Research Program Fellowship. Back

2 Present address: Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, Marseille 13009, France. Back

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Radiation Oncology, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard (Box 97), Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 792-0781; Fax: (713) 794-5573; E-mail: Apollack{at}notes.mdacc.tmc.edu Back

4 The abbreviations used are: PSA, prostate-specific antigen; Luc, luciferase; Ad5, adenovirus 5; pfu, plaque-forming units; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; NHS, normal horse serum. Back

Received 5/ 1/00; revised 8/14/00; accepted 8/24/00.

REFERENCES

  1. Pisansky T. M., Kahn M. J., Rasp G. M., Cha S. S., Haddock M. G., Bostwick D. G. A multiple prognostic index predictive of disease outcome following irradiation for clinically localized prostatic carcinoma. Cancer (Phila.), 79: 337-344, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Zagars G. K., Pollack A., von Eschenbach A. C. Prognostic factors in clinically localized prostate cancer–analysis of 938 patients irradiated in the PSA era. Cancer (Phila.), 79: 1370-1380, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Pollack A., Zagars G. K. External beam radiotherapy dose response of prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 39: 1011-1018, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Hanks G. E., Hanlon A. L., Schultheiss T. E., Pinover W. H., Movsas B., Epstein B. E., Hunt M. A. Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 41: 501-510, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Zelefsky M. J., Leibel S. A., Gaudin P. B., Kutcher G. J., Fleshner N. E., Venkatramen E. S., Reiter V. E., Fair W. R., Ling C. C., Fuks V. Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 41: 491-500, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Pilepich M. V., Caplan R., Byhardt R. W., Lawton C. A., Gallagher M. J., Mepic J. B., Hanus G. E., Coughlin C. T., Porter A., Shipley W. U., Grignon D. Phase III trial of androgen suppression using goserelin in unfavorable-prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy: report of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 85-31. J. Clin. Oncol., 15: 1013-1021, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bolla M., Gonzalez D., Warde P., Dubois J. B., Mirimanoff R. O., Storme G., Bernier J., Kuten A., Steinberg C., Gil T., Collette L., Pierart M. Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin. N. Engl. J. Med., 337: 295-300, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Granfors T., Modig H., Damber J-E., Tomic R. Combined orchiectomy and external radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for nonmetastatic prostate cancer with or without pelvic lymph node involvement: a prospective randomized trial. J. Urol., 159: 2030-2034, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Lim Joon D., Hasegawa M., Sikes C., Terry N. H. A., Zagars G. K., Meistrich M. L., Pollack A. Supra-additive apoptotic response of R3327-G rat prostate tumors to androgen ablation and radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 38: 1071-1077, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Zietman A. L., Prince E., Nakfoor B. M., Park J. J. Androgen deprivation and radiation therapy: sequencing studies using the Shionogi in vivo tumor system. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Oncol., 38: 1067-1070, 1997.
  11. Pollack A., Ashoori F., Sikes C., Joon D. L., von Eschenbach A. C., Zagars G. K., Meistrich M. L. The early supra-additive apoptotic response of R3327-G prostate tumors to androgen ablation and radiation is not sustained with multiple fractions. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 46: 153-158, 1999.[CrossRef]
  12. Colletier, P. J., Ashoori, F., Cowen, D., Meyn, R. E., Tofilon, P., Meistrich, M. E., and Pollack, A. Adenoviral mediated p53 transgene expression sensitizes both wild-type and null p53 prostate cancer cells in vitro to radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., in press, 2000.
  13. Zhang W. W., Alemany R., Wang J., Koch P. E., Ordonez N. G., Roth J. A. Safety evaluation of Ad5/CMV-p53 in vitro and in vivo. Hum. Gene Ther., 6: 155-164, 1995.[Medline]
  14. Wu C. S., Pollack A., Czerniak B., Chyle V., Zagars G. K., Dinney C. P. N., Hu S-X., Benedict W. F. Prognostic value of p53 in muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy. Urology, 47: 305-310, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Shipley W. U., Verhey L. J., Munzenrider J. E., Suit H. D., Urie M. M., McManus P. L., Young R. H., Shipley J. W., Zietman A. L., Biggs P. J., Heney N. M., Goietein M. Advanced prostate cancer: the results of a randomized comparative trial of high dose irradiation boosting with conformal protons compared with conventional dose irradiation using photons alone. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 32: 3-12, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Lee W. L., Hanks G. E., Hanlon A. L., Schultheiss T. E., Hunt M. A. Lateral rectal shielding reduces late rectal morbidity following high dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: further evidence for a significant dose effect. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 35: 251-257, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Kastan M. B., Onyekwere O., Sidransky D., Vogelstein B., Craig R. W. Participation of p53 protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Cancer Res., 51: 6304-6311, 1991.[Medline]
  18. Lowe S. W., Schmitt E. M., Smith S. W., et al p53 is required for radiation-induced apoptosis in mouse thymocytes. Nature (Lond.), 362: 847-885, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Nagasawa H., Li C-Y., Maki C. G., Imrich A. C., Little J. B. Relationship between radiation-induced G1 phase arrest and p53 function in human tumor cells. Cancer Res., 55: 1842-1846, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Srivastava S., Katayose D., Tong Y. A., Craig C. R., Mcleod D. G., Moul J. W., Cowan K. H., Seth P. Recombinant adenovirus vector expressing wild-type p53 is a potent inhibitor of prostate cancer cell proliferation. Urology, 46: 843-848, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Spitz F. R., Nguyen D., Skibber J. M., Cusack J., Roth J. A., Cristiano R. J. In vivo adenoviral-mediated p53 tumor suppressor gene therapy for colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res., 16: 3415-3422, 1996.[Medline]
  22. Kock H., Harris M. P., Anderson S. C., Machemer T., Hancock W., Sutjipto S., Wills K. N., Gregory R. J., Shepard H. M., Westphal M., Maneval D. C. Adenovirus mediated p53 gene transfer suppresses growth of human glioblastoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Cancer, 67: 808-815, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Roth J. A., Nguyen D., Lawrence D. D., Kemp B. L., Carrasco C. H., Ferson D. Z., Hong W. K., Komaki R., Lee J. J., Nesbitt J. C., Pisters K. M., Putnam J. B., Schea R., Shin D. M., Walsh G. L., Dolormente M. M., Han C. I., Martin F. D., Yen N., Xu K., Stephens L. C., McDonnell T. J., Mukhopadhyay T., Cai D. Retrovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene transfer to tumors of patients with lung cancer. Nat. Med., 2: 985-991, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Gotoh A., Kao C., Ko S. C., Hamada K., Liu T. J., Chung L. W. Cytotoxic effects of recombinant adenovirus p53 and cell cycle regulator genes (p21WAF1/CIP1 and p16CDKN4) in human prostate cancers. J. Urol., 158: 636-641, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Pirollo K. F., Hao Z., Rait A., Jang, Fee W. E., Jr., Ryan P., Chiang Y., Chang E. H. p53 mediated sensitization of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck radiotherapy. Oncogene, 14: 1735-1746, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Spitz F. R., Nguyen D., Skibber J. M., Meyn R. E., Cristiano R. J., Roth J. A. Adenoviral-mediated wild-type p53 gene expression sensitizes colorectal cancer cells to ionizing radiation. Clin. Cancer Res., 2: 1665-1671, 1996.[Abstract]
  27. Gallardo D., Drazan K. E., McBride W. H. Adenovirus-based transfer of wild-type p53 gene increases ovarian tumor radiosensitivity. Cancer Res., 56: 4891-4893, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Li J. H., Lax S. A., Kim J., Klamut H., Liu F. F. The effects of ionizing radiation and adenoviral p53 therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 43: 607-616, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Lang F. F., Yung W. K. A., Raju U., Libunao F., Temy N. H., Tofilon P. J. Enhancement of radiosensitivity of wild-type p53 human glioma cells by adenovirus-mediated delivery of the p53 gene. J. Neurosurg., 89: 125-132, 1998.[Medline]
  30. Broaddus W. C., Liu Y., Steele L. L., Gillies G. T., Lin P. S., Loudon W. G., Valerie K., Schmidt-Ullrich R. K., Fillmore H. L. Enhanced radiosensitivity of malignant glioma cells after adenoviral p53 transduction. J. Neurosurg., 91: 997-1004, 1999.[Medline]
  31. Badie B., Goh C. S., Klaver J., Herweijer H., Boothman D. A. Combined radiation and p53 gene therapy of malignant glioma cells. Cancer Gene Ther., 6: 155-162, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Harrison G. S., Glode M. L. Current challenges of gene therapy for prostate cancer. Oncology, 11: 845-850, 1997.[Medline]
  33. Gleave M., Hsieh J-T., Gao C., von Eschenbach A. C., Chung L. W. K. Acceleration of human prostate cancer growth in vivo by factors produced by prostate and bone fibroblasts. Cancer Res., 51: 3753-3761, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Hamada K., Alemany R., Zhang W-W., Hittelman N., Lotan R., Roth J. A., Mitchell M. F. Adenovirus-mediated transfer of a wild-type p53 gene and induction of apoptosis in cervical cancer. Cancer Res., 56: 3047-3054, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Gomez-Manzano C., Fueyo J., Kyritsis A. P., Steck P. A., Roth J. A., McDonnell T. J., Steck K. D., Levin V. A., Yung W. K. A. Adenovirus-mediated transfer of the p53 gene produces rapid and generalized death of human glioma cells via apoptosis. Cancer Res., 56: 694-699, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Mohan D. S., Kupelian P. A., Willoughby T. R. Short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer with daily transabdominal ultrasound localization of the prostate gland. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 46: 575-580, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Peters L. J. Inherent radiosensitivity of tumor and normal tissue cells as a predictor of human tumor response. Radiother. Oncol., 17: 177-190, 1990.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Pollack A., Zagars G. K., Smith L. G., Antolak J. A., Rosen I. I. Preliminary results of a randomized dose escalation study comparing 70 Gy to 78 Gy for the treatment of prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 45: 146-147, 1999.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. Anai, S. Goodison, K. Shiverick, Y. Hirao, B. D. Brown, and C. J. Rosser
Knock-down of Bcl-2 by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides induces radiosensitization and inhibition of angiogenesis in human PC-3 prostate tumor xenografts
Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2007; 6(1): 101 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. L. Pisters, C. A. Pettaway, P. Troncoso, T. J. McDonnell, L. C. Stephens, C. G. Wood, K.-A. Do, S. M. Brisbay, X. Wang, E. A. Hossan, et al.
Evidence That Transfer of Functional p53 Protein Results in Increased Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 10(8): 2587 - 2593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
L. Barzon, M. Boscaro, and G. Palu
Endocrine Aspects of Cancer Gene Therapy
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(1): 1 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
N. K. Sah, A. Munshi, T. Nishikawa, T. Mukhopadhyay, J. A. Roth, and R. E. Meyn
Adenovirus-mediated wild-type p53 radiosensitizes human tumor cells by suppressing DNA repair capacity
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2003; 2(11): 1223 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. W. Demers, D. E. Johnson, V. Tsai, S.-F. Wen, E. Quijano, T. Machemer, J. Philopena, M. Ramachandra, J. A. Howe, P. Shabram, et al.
Pharmacologic Indicators of Antitumor Efficacy for Oncolytic Virotherapy
Cancer Res., July 15, 2003; 63(14): 4003 - 4008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Chen, T. DeWeese, J. Dilley, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, N. Ramesh, J. Lee, R. Pennathur-Das, J. Radzyminski, J. Wypych, et al.
CV706, a Prostate Cancer-specific Adenovirus Variant, in Combination with Radiotherapy Produces Synergistic Antitumor Efficacy without Increasing Toxicity
Cancer Res., July 1, 2001; 61(14): 5453 - 5460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cowen, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pollack, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cowen, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pollack, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online