
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
Pharmacokinetics Research Laboratory, Tokushima Research Center, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokushima 771-0194, Japan [K. I., K. Y., E. M., S. N., Y. K.]; Toxicological Laboratory, SRI International, CA 94025-3493 [C. A. T.]; and Laboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan [K. K., K. C.]
ABSTRACT
Tegafur is a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) consisting of a new class of oral chemotherapeutic agents, tegafur/uracil and S-1, which are classified as dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidines. It is bioactivated to 5-FU via 5'-hydroxylation mediated by cytochrome P-450 (CYP). However, which isoform(s) of CYP is responsible for the bioactivation process of tegafur remains unclear. The purpose of the present study was to identify the human CYP isoform(s) involved in the metabolic activation of tegafur using human liver microsomes and cDNA-expressed human CYPs.
The formation of 5-FU from tegafur in human liver microsomes showed biphase kinetics with Km and Vmax values for the high-affinity component of 0.43 ± 0.05 mM and 4.02 ± 1.70 nmol/mg/min (mean ± SD, n = 4), respectively. In the correlation study using a panel of 10 human liver microsomes, the formation of 5-FU from tegafur showed a significant correlation (r = 0.98; P < 0.001) with coumarin 7-hydroxylation, a marker activity of CYP2A6. In addition, a specific substrate of CYP2A6 and anti-CYP2A6 antibody inhibited the formation of 5-FU by 90% in human liver microsomes. Moreover, cDNA-expressed CYP2A6 showed the highest activity for the formation of 5-FU among 10 cDNA-expressed CYPs, with a Km value similar to that found for the high-affinity component in human liver microsomes.
These findings clearly suggest that CYP2A6 is a principal enzyme responsible for the bioactivation process of tegafur in human liver microsomes. However, to what extent the bioactivation of tegafur by CYP2A6 accounts for the formation of 5-FU in vivo remains unclear, because the formation of 5-FU from tegafur is also catalyzed by the soluble fraction of a 100,000 x g supernatant and also derived from spontaneous degradation of tegafur.
INTRODUCTION
Tegafur is a prodrug of 5-FU3 synthesized >30 years ago (1) . Although its development was abandoned in the United States for more than two decades, it has been developed as a new class of oral chemotherapeutic agent in Japan. These new agents include tegafur/uracil and S-1, which are known as dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidines (2 , 3) . They have been so classified because they are composed of 5-FU prodrug and uracil or 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, which prevents the degradation of 5-FU, thus ensuring that the concentration of 5-FU remains at sustained levels in both the plasma and the tumor (3 , 4) . Tegafur/uracil and S-1 have been commercially available in Japan since 1983 and 1999, respectively, and have been extensively studied for their effectiveness in treating various tumors, including colon rectal cancer (3) , gastric carcinoma (5) , pulmonary malignancy (6) , and head and neck cancer (7) . Recently, they have been subjected to clinical evaluation in the United States (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) .
Tegafur is a depot form of fluorouracil, which releases 5-FU slowly in
the body. The conversion of tegafur to fluorouracil mainly occurs in
the liver. As illustrated in Fig. 1
, it
is hydroxylated at the 5'-position of a furan ring to produce
5'-hydroxytegafur, which is unstable and is spontaneously decomposed to
5-FU (8)
. This bioactivation process is thought to be
mediated by CYP, because NADPH is required for the conversion of
tegafur to 5-FU in liver microsomes (9)
, and its
conversion rate has been shown to be accelerated by the pretreatment of
mice with phenobarbital (10)
, a well-known inducer of CYP.
However, which isoform(s) of CYP is responsible for the bioactivation
process of tegafur remains unclear.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals.
Tegafur and 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine were obtained from Taiho
Pharmaceutical Co. (Saitama, Japan). NADP+,
glucose-6-phosphate and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase,
-naphthoflavone, quinidine, sulfaphenazole, and troleandomycin were
purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Coumarin and
p-nitrophenol were purchased from Nacalai Tesque, Inc.
(Kyoto, Japan). Other chemicals were of the highest grade commercially
available.
Enzymes and Antibodies.
Human liver microsomes were obtained from the International Institute
for the Advancement of Medicine (Exton, PA) or SRI International (Menlo
Park, CA). The human liver microsomes were diluted with 100
mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM DTT
and 20% (v/v) glycerol and stored at -80°C until use. Microsomes
prepared from human B-lymphoblastoid cells expressing CYP1A1 + OR,
CYP1A2, CYP2A6 + OR, CYP2B6, CYP2C8 + OR, CYP2C9(Arg) + OR, CYP2C19,
CYP2D6(Val) + OR, CYP2E1 + OR, and CYP3A4 + OR were obtained from
Gentest (Woburn, MA). Control microsomes expressed only the vector. A
monoclonal antibody against human CYP2A6 was obtained from Gentest.
Assay with Human Liver Microsomes.
The basic incubation mixture contained 0.5 mg/ml of human liver
microsomes, 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4), a
NADPH-generating system (2 mM NADP+,
5 mM glucose-6-phosphate, 1 IU/ml of glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase, and 5 mM MgCl2), 0.4
mM 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, and 1 mM
tegafur in a final volume of 250 or 500 µl. The mixture was incubated
at 37°C for 10 min. After the reaction was stopped by acute freezing
in acetone containing dry ice, the mixture was stored at -80°C until
analysis. The formation of 5-FU was determined by gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry (13)
. Because 5-FU is
extensively metabolized by a cytosolic protein, dihydropyridine
dehydrogenase, the amount of 5-FU formed from tegafur in human liver
microsomes is decreased by contaminated dihydropyridine dehydrogenase.
Therefore, 0.4 mM 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine was added
in the incubation mixture as a potent inhibitor of dihydropyridine
dehydrogenase (14)
. This concentration of
5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine did not inhibit the marker activities of
CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A in
human liver microsomes (data not shown).
Kinetic Studies.
Kinetic studies were performed using microsomes from four human livers
(H-33, H-35m H-69, and HHM0071). In determining kinetic parameters, the
tegafur concentration ranged from 0.520 mM. All reactions
were performed in a linear range with respect to protein concentration
and incubation time, 0.5 mg/ml microsomal protein and 10-min incubation
time. Because tegafur is nonenzymatically converted to 5-FU, the
content of 5-FU in the mixture incubated without microsomal protein was
subtracted from that with microsomal protein to correct the activity.
Eadie-Hofstee plots were constructed for determination of the
presence of a mono- or biphasic model. Because reactions followed
biphasic Michaelis-Menten kinetic behavior (i.e.,
two-enzyme kinetics), Michaelis-Menten kinetic parameters were
estimated by fitting the data to the following equation
(15)
:
![]() |
where V is the formation rate of 5-FU, S is
the concentration of tegafur in the incubation mixture,
Km1 and
Km2 are the affinity constants for the
high- and low-affinity components, respectively, and
Vmax1 and
Vmax2 are the maximum enzyme
velocities for the high- and low-affinity components, respectively.
Kinetic parameters were estimated initially by graphic analysis of
Eadie-Hofstee plots, and the values were subsequently used as initial
estimates for nonlinear regression analysis using a computer program
(DeltaGraph program; Statistical Product and Service Solutions, Inc.,
Chicago, IL). When the data did not fit Eq. A, kinetic parameters of
the reaction following biphasic Michaelis-Menten kinetic behavior were
estimated by fitting the data to the following equation
(16)
:
![]() |
where L represents the intrinsic clearance or Vmax/Km of low-affinity enzyme (i.e., Vmax2/Km2). Because reactions followed a simple Michaelis-Menten kinetic behavior (i.e., one-enzyme kinetics), the kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax, and Vmax/Km) of recombinant CYPs were estimated by nonlinear least-squares regression analysis.
Correlation Study.
Correlation between the formation rate of 5-FU at a
1-mM substrate concentration and 7-ethoxyresorufin
O-deethylase (CYP1A2), coumarin 7-hydroxylase (CYP2A6),
7-benzyloxyresorufin O-debenzylase (CYP2B6), tolbutamide
methylhydroxylase (CYP2C9), S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase
(CYP2C19), dextromethorphan O-demethylase (CYP2D6),
p-nitrophenol hydroxylase (CYP2E1), and testosterone
6ß-hydroxylase (CYP3A) activities were studied by using microsomes
from 10 human livers. The isoform-specific activities were determined
as described previously (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26)
. The correlation
coefficient (r) was calculated by the least-squares
regression method using an SAS system for Windows (version 6.12; SAS
Institute, Inc.).
Inhibition Study.
The effects of CYP isoform-specific inhibitors or substrates
(i.e., compounds able to act as competitive inhibitors) on
the formation of 5-FU at a 1 mM substrate
concentration were investigated using microsomal preparations obtained
from a human liver specimen (HHM-0071). The inhibitors used in this
part of the study were
-naphthoflavone (a CYP1A2 inhibitor; Ref.
27
), coumarin (a CYP2A6 substrate; Ref.
19
), sulfaphenazole (a CYP2C8/9 inhibitor; Ref.
27
), quinidine (a CYP2D6 inhibitor; Ref. 27
),
p-nitrophenol (a CYP2E1 inhibitor; Ref. 28
),
and troleandomycin (a CYP3A inhibitor; Ref. 27
). The range
of concentration used was 1100 µM. Inhibitors
were dissolved in DMSO and diluted with 100 mM
Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) so that the final concentration of solvent in
the incubation mixture was 0.5%. The same concentration of DMSO was
also added to the control. The incubation mixture, including chemical
inhibitors, was preincubated for 5 min before the reaction was
initiated by the addition of a substrate.
Inhibitory effects of antibodies to human CYP2A6 were examined by preincubating microsomes with the antibodies for 30 min on ice. Tegafur (1 mM) and other components of the incubation medium were then added, and the reaction was carried out as described above. The amounts of monoclonal antibodies against human CYP2A6 used were up to 0.8 µg/µg microsomal protein. This monoclonal antibody is a potent CYP2A6-specific inhibitor yielding 90% inhibition of human liver microsomal CYP2A6, whereas it does not inhibit human CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, or CYP3A4.4
Assay with Recombinant CYPs.
Microsomes from human B-lymphoblastoid cells expressing CYP1A1 (lot
19), CYP1A2 (lot 43), CYP2A6 (lot 26), CYP2B6 (lot 35), CYP2C8 (lot
13), CYP2C9 (lot 7), CYP2C19 (lot 9), CYP2D6 (lot 11), CYP2E1 (lot 26),
and CYP3A4 (lot 31) were used. The reactions were carried out as
described for the human liver microsomal study. To examine the role of
individual CYP isoforms involved in the formation of 5-FU from tegafur,
each of the recombinant CYPs (0.5 mg/ml) described above was incubated
with 1 mM tegafur for 10 min at 37°C, according to the
procedure recommended by the supplier.
Kinetic studies were performed using microsomes from human B-lymphoblastoid cells expressing CYP2A6 and CYP2C9. In determining kinetic parameters, the tegafur concentration ranged from 0.5 to 20 mM. All reactions were performed in a linear range with respect to protein concentration and incubation time, 0.5 mg/ml microsomal protein and 10-min incubation time. The kinetic parameters were estimated as described above.
RESULTS
Kinetics of 5-FU Formation from Tegafur in Human Liver Microsomes.
Eadie-Hofstee plots for the formation of 5-FU from tegafur (0.520
mM) in four human liver microsomes are shown in Fig. 2
. The plots showed biphasic curves,
suggesting that the reaction showed multiple-enzyme kinetic behavior.
Because the data obtained from three human liver microsomes (H-35,
H-69, and HHM-0071) fitted Eq. A, the kinetic parameters for high- and
low-affinity components were estimated. For a microsomal sample (H-33),
the kinetic parameters for the high-affinity component were estimated
by fitting the data to Eq. B. The kinetic parameters for the formation
of 5-FU in four human liver microsomes are listed in Table 1
. The mean
(± SD) kinetic parameters for the high-affinity component obtained
from four human liver microsomes were:
Km1 = 0.43 ± 0.05
mM, and
Vmax1 = 4.02 ± 1.70
nmol/mg/min. The
Vmax1/Km1
value was 88-fold greater that the
Vmax2/Km2
value (9.74 ± 5.42 versus 0.11 ± 0.11
µl/mg/min).
|
|
|
-naphthoflavone and p-nitrophenol, whereas the extent
of inhibition by these inhibitors was slight (<20%), even at a
concentration of 100 µM. No effects of
sulfaphenazole, quinidine, and troleandomycin were observed with
inhibitor concentrations up to 100 µM.
|
|
|
The results of the present study clearly showed that CYP2A6 is a
principal enzyme responsible for the bioactivation process of tegafur
in human liver microsomes. The supporting evidence can be summarized as
follows: (a) the formation rate of 5-FU from tegafur in a
panel of 10 human liver microsomes was significantly correlated with
coumarin 7-hydroxylase activity, a marker activity of CYP2A6
(r = 0.98; P < 0.001; Fig. 3
), but it
was not correlated with other activities of CYPs; (b)
coumarin, a specific substrate of CYP2A6, inhibited the formation of
5-FU in human liver microsomes in a concentration-dependent manner
(Fig. 4)
; (c) the anti-CYP2A6 antibody inhibited the
formation of 5-FU by 90% in human liver microsomes (Fig. 5)
;
(d) cDNA-expressed CYP2A6 showed the highest activity for
the formation of 5-FU among the 10 cDNA-expressed CYPs (Fig. 6)
with a
Km similar to that found for the
high-affinity component in human liver microsomes (Table 1)
. Although cDNA-expressed CYP2C9 showed
the second-highest activity for the formation of 5-FU from tegafur
(Fig. 6)
, it does not appear to contribute significantly to the
bioactivation of tegafur in human liver microsomes, because the
intrinsic clearance
(Vmax/Km)
for the formation of 5-FU from tegafur was much smaller than that of
CYP2A6.
CYP2A6 is an enzyme showing genetic polymorphism
(29)
. To date, there have been four mutant alleles,
designated as CYP2A6*2, *3, *4, and *5, in
addition to the wild-type allele (CYP2A6*1; Ref.
30
). CYP2A6*2 has a single base mutation
(T
A), leading to a change from Leu-160 to His-160 in exon 3, which
results in the formation of a catalytically inactive enzyme
(31)
. CYP2A6*3 has been proposed to be
inactive, because it was formed by the gene conversion of
CYP2A6*1 and functionally inactive CYP2A7 gene in
exons 3, 6, and 8 (31)
, although its functionality is not
fully understood because of the low prevalence of homozygotes for this
mutant allele. The gene frequencies of CYP2A6*2 are 1.1,
1.4, 3.0, and 2.3% in Swedes, Finns, Spaniards (32)
, and
Germans (33)
, respectively, and that of
CYP2A6*3 is 1.4% in Germans (33)
, but they
have not been detected in Japanese (34)
.
CYP2A6*4 is an allele with a partial or whole deletion of
the CYP2A6 gene (35, 36, 37, 38)
. Microsomes prepared
from the liver of a homozygote for the gene deletion of
CYP2A6 are devoid of CYP2A6 protein (29
, 35)
.
This type of mutant gene is relatively common in Oriental populations,
with frequencies of 15.1% in Chinese (37)
and 4.5% in
Japanese (38)
, whereas it is rare in Finns (1.0%) and
Spaniards (0.5%; Ref. 37
). CYP2A6*5 is a new
defective allele, but it is rare in Chinese (1.0%) and has not been
detected in Spaniards (30)
.
These mutant alleles of CYP2A6 have been reported to be
associated with decreased metabolic clearances of several drugs or
environmental chemicals. For example, the metabolic clearance of
SM-12502, a platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist, which is
entirely metabolized by CYP2A6, was shown to be markedly decreased in
subjects with a CYP2D6 gene deletion (36)
.
Similarly, the formation of cotinine from nicotine, which is
predominantly catalyzed by CYP2A6, is dramatically decreased in
homozygous subjects with a CYP2A6 gene deletion
(39)
. These findings coupled with the present observations
suggest that bioactivation of tegafur is suppressed and that there is
an insufficient level of 5-FU in the plasma or tumor of patients
treated with tegafur/uracil or S-1 if they carry mutant alleles of
CYP2A6. However, to what extent the bioactivation of tegafur
by CYP2A6 accounts for the formation of 5-FU in vivo remains
unclear, because the Km for the
formation of 5-FU from tegafur obtained in the present study
(i.e., 0.43 mM; Table 1
) is higher
than the plasma concentrations of tegafur (0.020.05
mM) after the repeated administration of
tegafur/uracil to the patients, 300 mg/m2/day
(40)
. In addition, the formation of 5-FU from tegafur is
also catalyzed by the soluble fraction of a 100,000 x
g supernatant, and 5-FU is derived from spontaneous
degradation of tegafur (41
, 42)
. Therefore, further
in vivo studies are clearly needed to clarify the influence
of CYP2A6 polymorphism on the formation of 5-FU in patients taking
tegafur/uracil or S-1.
Because few drugs are known to be metabolized by CYP2A6, there is limited information on drug interaction caused by the inhibition or induction of CYP2A6. Mäenpä et al. (43) reported that methoxalen, an antipsoriatic agent, inhibits the formation of 7-hydroxycoumarin from coumarin, the activity of which is the marker activity of CYP2A6 in vivo in human volunteers. Methoxalen was reported to be a mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP2A6 (44) . It was also reported that grapefruit juice flavonoids inhibit the formation of 7-hydroxycoumarin in healthy volunteers (45) . These findings suggest that the formation of 5-FU from tegafur may be suppressed by the concurrent administration of methoxalen or by taking tegafur with grapefruit juice. On the other hand, patients treated with antiepileptic drugs excrete all of the measurable 7-hydroxycoumarin in the first 4 h (46) , suggesting that CYP2A6 is inducible (29) . In accordance with the in vivo findings, an in vitro study using primary human hepatocytes indicated that CYP2A6 is induced by treatment with phenobarbital or rifampicin (29) . These findings suggest that the formation of 5-FU from tegafur is accelerated in patients treated with antiepileptic drugs or rifampicin.
In conclusion, the results of the present study clearly showed that CYP2A6 is a principal enzyme responsible for the bioactivation process of tegafur in human liver microsomes. This suggests that genetic polymorphism of CYP2A6 and/or drug interaction affect the formation of 5-FU from tegafur and modify the outcome of cancer chemotherapy using tegafur/uracil or S1, although further studies are clearly needed to confirm these possibilities.
FOOTNOTES
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 This study was supported by Grant-in-Aid 1-7-1-C
from the Japan Health Science Foundation. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Laboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology and Toxicology,
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho,
Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8522, Japan. Phone/Fax: 81-43-290-2919;
E-mail: kchiba{at}p.chiba-u.ac.jp ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: 5-FU,
5-fluorouracil; CYP, cytochrome P-450; OR, NADPH cytochrome P-450
oxidoreductase. ![]()
4 Gentest (Woburn, MA), unpublished data. ![]()
Received 6/28/00; revised 8/29/00; accepted 8/31/00.
REFERENCES
-furanidyl) derivatives of natural pyrimidine bases and their antimetabolites. Dokl. Akad. Nauk Uzb. USSR, 176: 332-335, 1967.
-butyrolactone. Cancer Res., 40: 2814-2819, 1980.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Fujita, H. Nakayama, W. Ichikawa, W. Yamamoto, H. Endo, F. Nagashima, R. Tanaka, T. Miya, Y. Sunakawa, K. Yamashita, et al. Pharmacokinetics of 5-Fluorouracil in Elderly Japanese Patients with Cancer Treated with S-1 (a Combination of Tegafur and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Inhibitor 5-Chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine) Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2009; 37(7): 1375 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fujita, W. Ichikawa, W. Yamamoto, H. Endo, F. Nagashima, R. Tanaka, T. Miya, K. Araki, K. Kodama, Y. Sunakawa, et al. Fixed dosing and pharmacokinetics of S-1 in Japanese cancer patients with large body surface areas Ann. Onc., May 1, 2009; 20(5): 946 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shirasaka Development History and Concept of an Oral Anticancer Agent S-1 (TS-1(R)): Its Clinical Usefulness and Future Vistas Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2009; 39(1): 2 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Yen-Revollo, R. M. Goldberg, and H. L. McLeod Can Inhibiting Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Limit Hand-Foot Syndrome Caused by Fluoropyrimidines? Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 8 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yokoo, A. Hamada, H. Watanabe, T. Matsuzaki, T. Imai, H. Fujimoto, K. Masa, T. Imai, and H. Saito Involvement of Up-Regulation of Hepatic Breast Cancer Resistance Protein in Decreased Plasma Concentration of 7-Ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) by Coadministration of S-1 in Rats Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2007; 35(9): 1511 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Ajani, J. Faust, K. Ikeda, J. C. Yao, H. Anbe, K. L. Carr, M. Houghton, and P. Urrea Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of S-1 Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Advanced Gastric Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2005; 23(28): 6957 - 6965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rooseboom, J. N. M. Commandeur, and N. P. E. Vermeulen Enzyme-Catalyzed Activation of Anticancer Prodrugs Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2004; 56(1): 53 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |